San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center
13328 San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo, CA 94806 · For profit - Corporation · 108 certified beds · (510) 235-3720 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,036 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-02)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.00 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.46 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.5%CMS range 43.1–65.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.4–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 79.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.7–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 97.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy and document review, the facility failed to implement systems and processes to ensure that 1 (Resident #29) of 8 residents who smoked were supervised while smoking and did not have access to cigarettes and lighters. Specifically, on 01/29/2024 at 1:33 PM, Resident #29 was observed with smoking materials in their possession unsupervised It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25d Accidents, at a scope and severity of K. The IJ began on 01/29/2024 at 1:33 PM, when Resident #29 was observed with smoking materials in their possession unsupervised. The Administrator and the Regional Quality Management Consultant were notified of the IJ and provided with the IJ template on 01/31/2024 at 9:15 AM. A Removal Plan was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent the elopement (a resident leaving the facility unsupervised or without permission) of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when staff did not relock the front main door at 6:30 a.m. after letting kitchen staff enter the facility.This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility unsupervised and without permission and placed the resident at risk for exposure to unfavorable weather conditions and possible injuries. During a review of Resident 1's admission record, printed 1/29/2026, the admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility in November 2025 11/26/25 with a diagnosis of encephalopathy (any disease, damage or malfunction that affects the brain's structure or function, resulting in an altered mental status), traumatic brain injury (a disruption in brain function caused by a blow, jolt or penetrating head injury) without loss of consciousness, unsteadiness of feet and type 2 diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure for injuries of unknown origin to thoroughly investigate an unexplained injury of unknown source for one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when facility did not know how Resident 1's right great toenail fell off exposing the nail bed. This failure had the potential to cause pain and placed Resident 1 at risk for emotional distress, mistreatment or abuse, and further injury.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 12/21/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status) score was 11 and indicated mild cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was not able to recall the day of the week.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents' behavior of dangling feet outside bed at times hitting the hard parts of the bed and nearby table were addressed on care plan with appropriate interventions. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for pain and injuries.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 12/21/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status) score was 11 and indicated mild cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was not able to recall the day of the week. MDS indicated Resident 1 had difficulty communicating some words or finish thoughts but able if prompted or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-02 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy and procedure to not employ or continue to employ anyone found guilty of abuse when: Facility employed one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) who had a finding of patient abuse record on background screening report conducted prior to employment. Facility did not check information from previous and/or current employers and make reasonable efforts to uncover information about any past criminal prosecutions for CNA 1 prior to employment. Finding is defined as a determination made by the state that validates allegation, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of their property. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for emotional distress, mistreatment, or abuse. During a review of Resident 1's progress note, titled SBAR, dated 1/20/26, the SBAR (a communication tool used by licensed nurses to document residents' condition).indicated Resident 1 reported that CNA 1 verbally and physically abused Resident 1. SBAR indicated Resident 1 appeared anxious, intimidated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure to report an allegation of financial abuse and misappropriation of resident property as required by law and regulations to the appropriate agencies for one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when Administrator did not notify law enforcement and report to the department when it was suspected that Certified Nursing Assistant/Customer Relations (CNA 1) used Resident 1's bank card with online purchases. Misappropriation of resident property and Financial Abuse- defined as the deliberate displacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent.This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for emotional distress, mistreatment, or abuse.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 9/10/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice supply was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions when there was reddish-brown matter inside the residents' ice machine and around the ice chute dispenser. These failures had potential to put residents at risk for food borne illness (an illness that comes from eating contaminated food and infection) and cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria or other microorganisms from one substance to another) that could have resulted in infection or spread of infection. Findings: During an observation and interview on 6/24/25 at 2:10 p.m. with the Maintenance Director (MD) and Registered Dietician (RD). MD opened the ice machine, and it showed a reddish-brown matter inside the back part of the ice container and around the ice chute dispenser. Using a paper towel, RD wiped the visible reddish-brown matter. RD showed the reddish-brown matter was transferred to the paper towel she used. RD stated she did not know what it was or where it came from. MD stated the reddish-brown matter looked like a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standards of professional practice were maintained during medication administration for four of four sampled residents (Residents 52, 253, 56 and 93) when licensed nurse pre-poured (generally refers to medications that have been prepared in advance and are ready for administration, rather than being prepared immediately before use) Residents 52, 253, 56 and 93's medication. This failure had the potential for a significant medication error that can lead to serious harm or even death. Findings: During a record review of Resident 52's admission Record (AR), printed on 6/25/25, the AR indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing problems) and anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive, persistent fear and worry that can significantly interfere with daily life). During a record review of Resident 253's AR, printed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food for four of 12 sampled residents (Residents 22, 56, 38 and 254) that was palatable when food was bland (lacked flavor). This failure had the potential to result in a negative dining experience that could lead to poor dietary intake, compromising the health and nutritional status of Residents 22, 56, 38 and 254 who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation and interview on 6/23/25, at 10:41 a.m. with Resident 22, Resident 22 stated the facility's food always tasted bland and lacked flavor. Resident 22 stated, Look at those salt and pepper I have on my table. That's how terrible their food is. Resident 22's tray table had plastic cups that contained multiple packets of salt and pepper. Resident 22 also had a personal small saltshaker. Resident 22 stated the facility's food had no flavor at all. During an interview on 6/23/25, at 11:45 a.m., with Resident 56, Resident 56 stated the facility's food could have been better because the food they served did not have a taste at all.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of two sampled residents (Resident 72) with dignity and respect when a staff member discussed Resident 72's diagnosis and condition while having lunch in front of another resident. This failure had the potential to affect Residents 72's privacy and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a record review of Resident 72's admission Record (AR), printed on 6/24/25, the AR indicated Resident 72 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses of Parkinsonism (a group of neurological conditions that share similar motor symptoms with Parkinson's disease, such as tremors, stiffness, and slow movement) and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life.) During a dining observation and interview on 6/23/25 at 12:20 p.m. with Activity Assistant (AA), without being asked, AA stated she was going to help Resident 72 during lunch because Resident 72 had Parkinson's disease (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure to refer the resident to the appropriate state-designated authority for level II PASARR evaluation for one of two sample selected resident (Resident 37) when Resident 37 was positive for level I PASARR (the preliminary screening process has identified a potential mental illness or intellectual/developmental disability), and did not refer for PASARR II evaluation. This failure could result in placement in an inappropriate facility, lack of needed mental health services and increase of behavioral issues or hospitalizations. Findings: A review of Resident 37's admission Record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD [a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event, either being part of it or witnessing it. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety and uncontrollable thoughts about the event]). During a review of Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level one Screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services related to enteral feeding (also referred to as tube feeding, is the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach, duodenum, or jejunum) nutrition for one sampled resident (Resident 252) on a feeding tube when Resident 252 did not receive the calculated amount of tube feeding formula (designed to provide nutrition to individuals who cannot consume adequate food orally) per physician's order. This failure had the potential to cause dehydration, weight loss, and gastrointestinal (GI, relating to stomach and intestines) problems such as abdominal pain and diarrhea. Findings: During a record review of Resident 252's admission Record (AR), printed on 6/25/25, the AR indicated Resident 252 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding into the space surrounding the brain caused by head trauma) and gastrostomy status (refers to the presence of a gastrostomy tube, a surgically placed tube into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of six residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) were free from physical abuse when: 1) Resident 1 was hit in the head by Resident 2, 2) Resident 3 had lemonade thrown at her by Resident 4. This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 3 being the recipient of physical abuse which affected their physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1) A review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet, printed 3/4/25, indicated Resident 1 ' s diagnoses of heart failure (heart not able to pump enough blood to meet body ' s needs) and generalized weakness. A review of Change in Condition Evaluation, written on 12/8/24 at 9:42 a.m., the Change in Condition Evaluation noted Resident 1 was in the room waiting for Resident 2 to come out of the bathroom. Resident 1 stated when Resident 2 came out of the bathroom, Resident 2 hit her twice in the head. In the Pain Assessment section, Resident 1 reported a pain level of 4 (0 being the lowest pain level and 10 being the highest pain level). During an interview on 3/4/25, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents. Resident 1 alleged that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1) hit him on the right leg because he refused to wear a sock. Facility designee/Director of Nursing (DON) did not interview alleged CNA, staff member assigned to provide care for Resident 1 and/or implement care plan to suspend alleged abuser while incident was under investigation. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for emotional distress, mistreatment, or abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 3/11/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.) Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and care services was provided for one (Resident 2) of three sampled residents in accordance with professional standards of practice when, rehabilitation referral for restorative nursing (RNA) for Resident 1 was not followed up. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the necessary care and services to ensure mobility and muscle strength. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - Resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 2/26/25, the MDS indicated Resident 2's Basic Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.) score was 15 and indicated intact mental status. The MDS indicated Resident 2 was able to recall the correct year, month, and day of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide choice based on resident preferences for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not changed to his hospital gown upon request and was left in street clothes overnight. This failure had the potential to cause physical discomfort and emotional distress to Resident 1. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, printed 12/31/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart can't pump blood efficiently) and type 2 diabetes (a long-term disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood). During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Care Plan, dated 1/26/24, the Care Plan indicated Resident 1 had decreased ability to perform self-care related to impaired activity tolerance, impaired balance/safety, pain limiting function, weakness . During an observation and interview on 12/27/24, at 8:55 a.m., with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s call light was not answered in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to cause physical discomfort and emotional distress to Resident 1. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, printed 12/31/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart can't pump blood efficiently) and type 2 diabetes (a long-term disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood). During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Care Plan, dated 1/26/24, the Care Plan indicated Resident 1 had decreased ability to perform self-care related to impaired activity tolerance, impaired balance/safety, pain limiting function, weakness . During an observation and interview on 12/27/24, at 9:00 a.m., with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s room had: 1. Uncovered trash bin which contained an overflow of soiled diapers and dirty gloves. 2. Resident 1 ' s clothing stored in a mesh bag which was on the floor right next to the overflowing trash. This deficient practice had the potential to cause an unsanitary environment and spread of infection. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, printed on 12/31/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart can't pump blood efficiently) and type 2 diabetes (a long-term disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood). During an observation and interview on 12/27/24, at 8:55 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 was sitting on his bed. Under Resident 1 ' s edge of the bed, there was a small trash bin with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3), received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene when they were not receiving showers consistently and as scheduled. This failure resulted in these residents being unhappy and facility not meeting their physical, mental, and psychological needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet, the face sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Diabetes (a long-term (chronic) disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood), severe obesity, generalized weakness, and depression. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 7/21/24, the MDS indicated, a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS, a brief scanner to help detect cognitive impairment) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated, Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the physical environment in accordance with standards of practice, when one resident room and the bathroom used by five residents was not clean. This failure did not ensure residents were provided with a clean, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Findings: During an observation on 10/9/24 at 11 a.m., in Resident 1 and 3 ' s bathroom, the bathroom appeared dirty. Over the toilet bowl a raised toilet seat with arms was placed. Inside the toilet bowl, there were dried scattered brown/black substance around its upper surface and some around the raised toilet seat over it. The toilet bowl had yellowish liquid inside which appeared like urine still sitting there not flushed. There was trash can with no trash liner and looked dirty inside. The bathroom floor appeared dirty. During an interview on 10/9/24 at 11:05 a.m., with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated, they don ' t clean the bathroom unless you call them. Resident 2 stated the bathroom is always like that unless they call the housekeeping to clean it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), were free from physical abuse when Resident 1 hit Resident 2 on his left lower leg while Resident 2 was sleeping and Resident 2 punched Resident 1 on the chest during a second altercation few hours later. This failure placed Resident 1 and Resident 2 at significant risk for physical and emotional harm. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/4/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility in August 2024. During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.), dated 9/18/24, Resident 1 had diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems. It includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis), major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 (a respiratory virus that can cause mild to severe respiratory illness) when: 1. Resident room doors in the COVID-19 positive wing were left open. 2. The portable air conditioning unit filters were not cleaned per manufacturer's recommendation. 3. The portable air conditioning unit in the COVID-19 positive wing was turned off. Findings: During an interview on 7/2/24 at 1:57 p.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated there were 36 active cases of COVID-19 as of 7/2/24. During an interview and concurrent record review on 7/2/24 at 2:04 p.m. with IP, facility map and list of COVID-19 residents were reviewed. IP stated on 6/20/24, there were four residents that tested positive for COVID-19. IP stated on 6/24/24, a total of 20 residents also tested positive for COVID-19, followed by four more residents on 6/28/24. IP stated the facility transferred all residents that tested positive for COVID-19 to a COVID-designated area (Station 2).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all registry employees were screened for background check and trained on abuse prevention when one registry Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 did not have a background check or abuse prevention training prior to taking care of residents in the facility. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for injury or harm. Findings: During an interview on 6/20/24 at 10:40 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the staff that was involved in an alleged employee to resident abuse incident of Resident 1 on 4/6/24. The staff was a registry CNA (CNA 1). A request was made for the abuse prevention training and CNA certification for the CNA 1. During an interview on 6/20/24 at 1:10 p.m. with DON, DON stated the Staffing Coordinator (SC) was the one responsible for screening and checking the documents of registry staff. The facility did not produce the CNA certification or abuse training for CNA 1. During a telephone interview on 6/21/24 at 9:25 a.m. with SC, SC confirmed that she was the one in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to provide pain management to Resident 1 consistent with comprehensive person-centered plan of care and resident's goals when Resident 1 was not administered pain medication (hydromorphone, an opioid analgesic to treat moderate to severe pain) as ordered. This failure resulted in Resident 1's pain not being control resulting in increased agitation and verbal aggression. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 4/24/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), polyneuropathy (condition in which a person's peripheral nerves are damaged, affecting the nerves in the skin, muscles,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services and procedures that assure accurate dispensing and administration of controlled drugs when administration of hydromorphone (a controlled opioid medication to treat pain) was not accurately recorded in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). This failure had the potential to result in confusion in dosing administration and drug diversion. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 4/24/24, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), polyneuropathy (condition in which a person's peripheral nerves are damaged, affecting the nerves in the skin, muscles, and organs), cellulitis (common bacterial skin infection that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to ensure allegation of a missing wallet was investigated thoroughly. This failure had the potential to result in further potential misappropriation of Resident 1's personal property. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included essential hypertension (abnormally elevated blood pressure), chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm) and primary open angle glaucoma (happens when the eye's drainage canals become clogged over time, can cause gradual vision loss). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 2/12/24, the MDS indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information) score of 15 (A BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had medication in their room and self-administered medications had a physician's order to do so and were assessed as safe to self-administer medication(s). The deficiency affected 4 (Residents #18, #28, #49, and #82) of the 21 sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Medication - Self Administration, revised on 01/01/2012, revealed The Facility will allow a resident to self-administer medications when determined capable to do so by the IDT [interdisciplinary team] and the resident's Attending Physician. Per the policy, II. If a resident wants to self-administer medication, the IDT will assess the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to carry out this responsibility based on a review of an assessment by a Licensed Nurse. 1. A review of Resident #28's admission Record revealed the facility most recently admitted the resident on 02/24/2022,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #6) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives had an order in their electronic health record (EHR) that was consistent with the resident's wishes for no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Advance Directives, revised in [DATE], indicated that the purpose of the policy was To ensure that the Facility respects advance directives. The policy revealed, The facility will respect a resident's advance directive and will comply with the resident's wishes expressed in an advance directive. The policy revealed, Do Not Resuscitate - Indicates that, in case of respiratory or cardiac failure, the resident, legal guardian, health care proxy, or representative (sponsor) has directed that no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or other life-saving methods are used. A review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse were reported to facility administration immediately for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #6 made an allegation of abuse to a charge nurse that was not immediately reported to the Administrator. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Abuse- Reporting & Investigations, revised in March 2018, revealed, Allegations of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation or reasonable suspicion of a crime to be [sic] reported to the Administrator or designated representative immediately. A review of Resident #6's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 02/01/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified injury at the C2 level of the cervical spinal cord, chronic pain syndrome, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. A review of Resident #6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to schedule and complete a quarterly care plan review for 3 (Residents #8, #28, and #82) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for care planning. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, revised in November 2018, revealed f. Each resident and/or resident representative will actively remain engaged in his or her care planning process through the resident's rights to participate in the development of, and be informed in advance of changes in the plan of care. The policy specified, c. The comprehensive care plan will be periodically reviewed and revised by IDT [interdisciplinary team] after each assessment which means after each MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment as required, except discharge assessments. 1. A review of Resident #28's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/24/2022, with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy and document review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control procedures during wound care for 2 (Resident #11 and Resident #76) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. Findings included: A review of an undated facility Clean Dressing Change Competency/Validation form revealed Competency Description: Dressings are applied using clean technique to promote wound healing and to prevent cross-contamination among and between residents and caregivers. A section titled Procedures revealed, Remove soiled dressing, noting drainage amount and type then discard in the appropriate waste receptacle. Remove old dressings, one layer at a time, if layered. Determine if dressing remains appropriate for treatment. Thoroughly inspect the wound. Remove and discard gloves, perform hand hygiene and apply clean gloves. Cleanse/irrigate wound, including periwound, as ordered. The form revealed, Remove and discard gloves, perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (Residents 1, 2 and 3) of three sampled residents were served meals in a dignified manner when the residents reported their meals were served in Styrofoam containers and were provided plastic utensils; and one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents was not provided a shower for weeks. These failures did not promote a positive dining experience for Residents 1, 2, and 3; and Resident 1 stated feeling ignored when staff did not honor her request to use an extra-large transfer sling for a shower. Findings: 1. During an observation and interview on 4/18/23 at 9:34 a.m., Resident 1 stated it was about a month the facility served meals in Styrofoam containers and provided plastic utensils and paper cups. Resident 1 stated kitchen service was erratic due to lack of staff, broken equipment, and budget. Resident 1 stated it was unenjoyable to eat this way for weeks. During an interview on 4/18/23 at 10:02 a.m., Resident 2 stated I don…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-04 · tag F0660 — patternPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy regarding discharge planning for three residents (Resident 50, 51 and 75) of 25 sampled residents when the facility did not complete a discharge plan within seven days of admission. This resulted in Residents 50, 51 and 75 not having plans for discharge and causing unnecessary anxiety and frustrations. Findings: 1. During a review on 6/2/21, at 10:30 a.m., the facility Face Sheet indicated, Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, fracture of the right femur, unsteady on his feet, and drug abuse. During an interview on 6/1/21, at 11:00 a.m., Resident 50 stated he still needed to know when he would be discharged from the facility. Resident 50 stated he was concerned about how he could function in the community and he was anxious. During a review of the Care Conference Summary, dated 4/29/21, it indicated, Resident 50 asked when he would be discharged ? Resident 50 was notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide professional nursing care for three residents (Resident 35, 51 and 52) of 25 sample residents on hemodialysis (an artificial kidney procedure used to clean the patient's blood), when; 1. Staff did not remove the dressing and assess the hemodialysis venous access site per policy post hemodialysis for resident 35. 2. Staff did not assess and monitor the hemodialysis venous access site for Resident 51,. 3. Intake and Output (I&O) was not monitored since admission and dietary recommendations from the Registered Dietician (RD) were not carried out for Resident 52. These failures had the potential for life-threatening complications including severe bleeding for Resident 35 and 51 and severe kidney compromise and fluid overload for Resident 52. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 35's face sheet, it indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including, End-Stage Renal Disease [(ESRD) - a medical condition in which a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to answer residents call lights in a timely fashion due to a lack of sufficient staff. These failures resulted in Resident 75 having an episode of urinating and defecating in her bed which made her feel hopeless and embarrassed and Resident 243 urinated in the bed waiting for assistance from the staff. Findings: 1. During a review of Face Sheet dated 5/11/21 for Resident 75, the Face Sheet indicated she was admitted with multiple diagnoses including, Morbid Obesity and chronic pain. During a review of Resident 75 Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents of long term care nursing facilities], dated 5/17/21 indicated, Resident 75 cognitive status was intact. Resident 75's Functional status indicated she needed extensive assistance in toileting. During an interview with Resident 75 on 6/2/21, at 10:30 a.m., Resident 75 complained that it took staff 45 minutes to answer her call light. Resident 75 stated she urinated and had a bowel movement in her bed as the staff took too long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that two (Resident 52 and 51) of 25 sampled residents medications were not given medications with meals as ordered by their physicians. 1. Resident 52's medication Renvela (lowers phosphorus level in the blood), prescribed for end stage kidney disease, was not given with food as ordered . 2. Resident 51 did not receive Selvelamer (lowers the phosphorus level in the blood), as prescribed for end stage kidney disease. These failures had the potential to increase the residents 52 and 51's phosophorus levels which could cause further kidney damage. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 52's Facesheet, dated 6/3/2021, the facesheet indicated, Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (ESRD, a condition in which the kidneys no longer function normally) and was dependent on hemodialysis (artificial means of filtering the blood when the kidneys fail). During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted respect and dignity of two residents (Resident 54, 20) in a sample of 25 residents when, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 stood over Resident 54 and resident 20 while assisting them with their meals. This deficient practice had the potential for residents 20 and 54 not feeling respected and a diminishment of their individual dignity. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/2/21, at 9:17 a.m., Resident 54 was observed in bed left in a high position without staff supervision. In a follow-up interview immediately following the observation, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 confirmed she fed Resident 54 and had forgotten to lower the bed after assisting the resident with breakfast. During a concurrent follow-up observation and interview on 6/2/21, at 12:43 p.m., CNA 4 was observed standing next to the bed while assisting Resident 54 with lunch. CNA 4 stated she did not bring a chair in. CNA 4 remained standing while feeding the resident. 2. During another observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to address lost of personal property for two (Resident 51 and 90) of 25 sampled residents when: 1. A personal Hoyer lift sling (a soft material used to support and wrap around part of the patient's body, and attach to patient lifts) for Resident 51 was lost. 2. A wallet containing Identification Cards (ID) and money belonging to Resident 90 was missing. These failures resulted in loss of personal possessions belonging to Residents 51 and 90. Findings: 1. During a review on 6/2/21, at 10:30 a.m., the facility Face Sheet indicated, Resident 51 was admitted on [DATE]. During an interview with Resident 51 on 6/1/21, at 9:45 a.m., Resident 51 complained that the staff lost his personal Hoyer sling few days after he was admitted to the facility. Resident 51 stated the Hoyer sling the staff use on him was hurting his back and shoulder. Resident 51 stated he told the Certified Nurses Aides (CNAs) every time but nothing was done to resolve the issue.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care to maintain good nutrition and personal hygiene for three Residents (54, 58, and 74) of 42 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 54 was not fed lunch until half hour after the meal was served. This failure had the potential to result in the meal being cold and unpalatable 2. Resident 58, and Resident 74 were not provided the needed assistance with nail care appearing poorly groomed. This failure had the potential to cause emotional distress and physical discomfort. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 54's Facesheet, dated 6/3/21, the facesheet indicated, Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included hemiplegia (weakness to one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke), affecting the left non-dominant side, and on palliative (a specialized medical care for people with a serious illness) care. During a review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accidents and hazards for one resident (Resident 54) in a sample of 42 residents, when the bed was not returned to a low position after Resident 54 was assisted with a meal. This failure had the potential to place Resident 54 at risk for injury from fall. Findings: During a review of Resident 54's Facesheet, dated 6/3/21, the facesheet indicated, Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included hemiplegia (weakness to one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side. During a review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct care) dated 5/5/21, the MDS indicated, Resident 54 was totally dependent on one person for assistance with eating, transfers, and personal hygiene, and has a severely impaired cognition. During an observation on 6/2/21, at 9:17 a.m., inside the resident's room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-06-26 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had 12 residents (Rt)'s rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER],10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, and 40) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident who occupied these rooms. This deficient practice had potential to result in inadequate space for delivery of care to each of the residents in each room, or for storage of the resident's belongings. Findings: During an observation on 6/23/25, at 11;00 a.m., the following rooms and corresponding square footage per bed were identified: Room Activity Room size Floor area 3 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] in x 227 in 78 sq. ft per bed 10 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].5 in x 155.5 in 71.54 sq. ft per bed 11 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].5 in x 227 in 79.6 sq. ft per bed 15 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] in x 156 in 72.58 sq. ft per bed 16 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] in x 156 in 79.08 sq. ft per bed 17 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] in x156 in 79.08 sq. ft per bed 22 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] in x 156 in 77.66 sq. ft per bed 25 Rt room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms measured at least 80 square (sq) feet (ft) per resident in 12 (Rooms 3, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, and 40) of 41 resident rooms in the facility. Findings included: A review of an undated facility Client Accommodation Analysis form revealed This form is designed to provide a record of client accommodations approved for licensed care. It identifies the approved use of individual rooms and approved capacities. Further review revealed the following resident rooms and corresponding square footage: - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 78 sq ft of living space per resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 71.54 sq ft of living space per resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 79.6 sq ft of living space per resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 72.58 sq ft of living space per resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 79.08 sq ft of living space per resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 79.08 sq ft of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-06-04 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had 12 resident rooms (room numbers 3, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, and 40) with a designated total of 30 beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident who occupied these rooms. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of care by facility staff and for the lack of sufficient space for storage of residents' belongings. Findings: During an observation on 6/2/21 at 10:23 a.m., the following resident rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft.) were identified: room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 234 sq. ft. and had three beds making for 78 sq. ft. of space per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 143 sq. ft. and had two beds making for 71.54 sq. ft. of space per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 238.8 sq. ft. and had three beds making for 79.6 sq. ft. of space per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was a total of 145.6 sq. ft. and had two beds making for 72.58 sq. ft. of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,036 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-02-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SOL HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 99% | since 02/04/2010 |
| MAJER, SOL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/04/2010 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2010 |
| COOPER, DUSTIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/15/2023 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| RIJHWANI, MARVI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| ERETZ SAN PABLO PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/29/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056359. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.