Dinuba Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 89.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise and monitor one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was outside of the facility during a hot weather. This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping (to leave a healthcare facility without permission, authorization, or supervision) and being admitted to the hospital for two days due to heat stroke (a heat-related illness, occurs when the body can no longer control its temperature and the body's temperature rises rapidly). Findings: During a review of the facility's Risk Review Note (RRN-summary of investigation), dated July 6, 2023, the RRN indicated, [On 7/4/23] Resident [1] was observed by staff member to be sitting in the wheelchair in the front patio with another resident at approximately 4:10 p.m. Was noted to have left the premises at approximately 4:35 p.m. At approximately 5:10 p.m., fire department alerted staff he [Resident 1] was being transported to hospital after he was found in close by neighborhood. During an observation on 7/18/23 at 10:20 a.m., at the front patio of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1)'s care plan was implemented after a fall incident. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience subsequent falls.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's IDT (interdisciplinary team-group of professionals who work together to provide comprehensive, patient-centered care)-Post Fall Review (IDTPFR) dated 2/3/26, the IDTPFR indicated, 2/3/2026 1:50 p.m. fall was unwitnessed.Approx (approximately) 1347 (1:47 p.m.) writer heard shouting from staff member that resident is found on the floor, noted to be bleeding.upon arrival residentis [sic] laying on right side in cradle positioning.Indicate all intervention recommendations and IDT Referrals.nonskid tape (adhesive tape with a textured, abrasive surface designed to increase traction and prevent slips and falls on slippery or hazardous surfaces) at bedside.During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP) dated 2/4/26, the CP indicated, The resident is at risk for falls related to her poor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:Ensure their Advance Directive (legal document that specifies a person's medical care and end of life wishes, should the person become unable to communicate those wishes) questionnaire contained all the necessary regulatory requirements for five of eleven sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 10, Resident 8, Resident 76, and Resident 3). 2.Ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 13) had a signed and dated Advance Directive. These failures had the potential for residents' rights to formulate an advanced directive and for medical care wishes and/or end of life issues to not be honored.Findings: 1.During a record review on 1/6/26 at 2:26 p.m., Resident 1's Advance Directive Questionnaire (ADQ) was reviewed. The ADQ did not have a question that asked if Resident 1 wanted more information on how to execute an advance directive. During a record review on 1/6/26 at 2:34 p.m. Resident 10's ADQ was reviewed. The ADQ did not have a question that asked if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and recorded review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P & P) titled, Assistance with Meals, for three of four sampled Residents (Resident 11, Resident 32, Resident 22) when the Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA)'s was standing while assisting Resident 11, Resident 32, and Resident 22 during lunch meal. This failure had the potential for Resident 11, Resident 32, and Resident 22 to negatively impact their dignity while being assisted with meals.Findings:During an interview on 1/5/26 at 12:25 p.m. with CNA 3, CNA 3 stated there was usually two staff members assisting in the dining room. CNA 3 stated today she was the only one assisting in the dining room. During an observation on 1/5/26 at 12:37 p.m. in the dining room, CNA 3 was standing over Resident 32 while assisting her with feeding.During an observation on 1/6/26 at 12:33 p.m. in the dining room, CNA 4 placed a spoonful of pureed food into Resident 22's mouth while standing over her.During an interview on 1/7/26 at 1:41 p.m. with CNA 5, CNA 5 stated the process for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool) assessment was accurate for one of five sampled residents (Resident 76). This failure resulted in an inaccurate medical record.Findings:During an interview on 1/6/26 at 10:08 a.m. with Resident 76, Resident 76 stated a hospice (program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life and have stopped treatment to cure or control their disease) aide took her outside to smoke three times a week. Resident 76 stated she smoked two cigarettes each time she was taken outside to smoke.During an interview on 1/7/26 at 10:17 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated Resident 76 is on hospice care and is the only resident in the facility who has smoking privileges. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/7/26 at 11:11 a.m. with DON, Resident 76's MDS was reviewed. MDS Section J- Health Conditions question J1300, dated 11/20/25 was reviewed. Question J1300 indicated, Current Tobacco Use. No. DON stated the tobacco use MDS assessment was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication services were available for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 58) who did not speak English. This failure had the potential for Resident 58's needs go unmet.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/5/26 at 10:30 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 in Resident 58's room, Resident 58 was speaking in her native language. CNA 2 stated Resident 58 speaks [NAME] (language spoken in [NAME]). CNA 2 stated there was no communication board or any picture board to know what Resident 58 was saying. CNA 2 stated she did not speak [NAME]. During an interview on 1/6/26 at 10:40 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated she was not aware of any translation services offered by the facility. LVN 1 stated one staff member, Registered Nurse (RN) 1, spoke [NAME] and could communicate with Resident 58, when she was working. During a review of the facility's current January schedule, RN 1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an activity assessment and activity care plan was completed for one of five sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure resulted in Resident 10 not having the opportunity to discuss his activity preferences and have his preferences honored. Findings:During an interview on 1/6/26 at 9:07 a.m. with Resident 10, Resident 10 stated he had never been asked if he wanted to participate in any activities. During an interview on 1/6/26 at 9:41 a.m. with Resident 10, Resident 10 stated he cannot voluntarily move his arms or legs due to a motorcycle accident and can only shrug his shoulders.During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/8/26 at 9:36 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 10's medical record (MR) was reviewed. DON stated she was unable to find an activities assessment or activities care plan. DON stated Activities Director (AD) is responsible for completing the activities assessment and activities care plan.During an interview on 1/8/26 at 9:45 a.m. with AD, AD stated she had not completed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:Complete a care plan for smoking for one of one sampled resident (Resident 76). 2. Ensure a smoking assessment was available to facility staff. 3. Conduct an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- various healthcare staff meet to share information and updates, collaborate to solve problems, and develop and update the resident's care plan) meeting that included Resident 76's smoking. These failures had the potential to jeopardize Resident 76's safety.Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/26 at 10:08 a.m. with Resident 76, in her room, Resident 76 stated a hospice (program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life and have stopped treatment to cure or control their disease) aide took her outside to smoke three times a week. Resident 76 was unable to stop moving both of her arms in a shaking, tremor (uncontrolled movement) -like manor. Resident 76 stated she does not have Parkinson's (disease which causes involuntary tremors of body parts). Resident 76 stated her tremors were caused by too…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe administration of medications when:1. IV (Intravenous- method of delivering fluids, medicine or nutrition directly into a vein) Emergency Infusion Supply (E-kit- basic supplies for IV access, fluids, and antibiotics) was expired.2. Discontinued narcotics (a drug or substance that affects mood or behavior) were not stored safety.3. Medication was left unattended on top of the medication cart.These failures had the potential for medications to be administered incorrectly and unsafely.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 3:10 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), in medication storage cabinet in the hallway, there was an expired e-kit dated [DATE]. Upon reviewing the e-kit medications the following medications were expired:D5W (sterile IV solution contains 5% sugar in normal saline) 1000 ML (milliliters- unit of measure) expired on [DATE].NACL (sodium chloride 0.9%) 250 ML expired on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served according to the facility's policy and procedure for two of two sampled residents (Resident 84 and Resident 92). These failures had the potential to result in food borne illness to Resident 84 and Resident 92.Findings:During an observation on 1/5/26 at 12:24 pm, in the B-Wing hallway rehab dining room. Two residents' meal trays were seen on bed side tables, no staff or residents were present in the rehab dining room. The meal tray identification tickets indicated one of the meal trays belonged to Resident 84 and the second meal tray belonged to Resident 92.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/5/26 at 12:27 pm, with Restorative Nurse Aide (RNA) 1, RNA 1 stated she had just taken a resident back to their room. RNA 1 stated, These two trays belonged to residents in their bedrooms, and I'm going to take them [resident meal trays] to them.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/5/26 at 12:27 pm, with Dietary Manager (DM) 1, DM 1 arrived at the rehab dining room where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one Oxygen e-tank (highly flammable, compressed gas cylinder) was transported in a safe and secure manner by staff. This failure had the potential to result in injury and death to residents, staff, and visitors.Findings:During an observation on 1/5/26 at 12:47 pm, on the B-wing hallway, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA ) 1 was seen walking down the hallway carrying an Oxygen e-tank by the straps of the fabric wheelchair Oxygen e-tank holder.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/5/26, at 12:48 pm, with CNA 1 and Social Service Director (SSD), CNA 1 stated, We have a metal stand we use [to transport oxygen e-tanks]. SSD stated, Both residents [present in the hallway at the time] were dependent assistance, and were unable to ambulate without assistive device [unable to move without staff assistance in the event of an emergency].During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Oxygen Administration,(undated), the P&P indicated, Equipment and Supplies The following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MADISON CREEK PARTNERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $855K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA