Glenwood Springs Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 38.5 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2024-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to treat and prevent pressure injuries for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers out of 39 sample residents. Resident #1, who was known to be at risk for pressure injuries, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (disabling disease of brain and spinal cord), neurogenic bladder and metabolic encephalopathy (brain disorder caused by chemical imbalance of the blood). Hospital documentation recommended treatment for the wounds which were present to the Resident #1's sacrum, right lower extremity and left lower extremity upon the resident's readmission to the facility on 3/17/24. The recommendations further indicated the resident was to follow up with outpatient wound care. However, the facility failed to initiate a care plan and interventions to prevent the development of pressure injuries until 5/11/24. On 5/6/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#11) of two residents reviewed for pressure injuries, out of 26 sample residents, received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and heal pressure injuries. Resident #11 had a facility acquired unstageable pressure injury which was not identified as unavoidable in the medical record. The review of the resident's progress notes and medical record between 11/11/21 and 1/10/22 did not identify the resident was seen by her primary physician or by a wound physician after it was identified the resident had an unstageable pressure injury/DTI (deep tissue injury). The review of the resident's medical record indicated the resident was not identified to have any skin related issues to her left heel until it was identified as unstageable on 11/11/21. The resident was at risk for developing pressure injuries according to the Braden scale risk assessment and the 10/21/21 minimum data set (MDS) assessment. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for six (#9, #7, #8, #15, #2 and #13) of 10 residents out of 15 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for Resident #9, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #15, Resident #2 and Resident #13.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Answering the Call Light policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/21/26 at 6:48 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Ensure that the call light system is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility and from the floor. II. Resident #9 A. Resident status Resident #9, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment was not completed at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse involving two (#1 and #2) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of 15 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Timely report an allegation of physical abuse by Resident #2 towards Resident #1; and,-Timely report an allegation of verbal abuse by Resident #1 towards Resident #2.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/21/26 at 6:48 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from risk of accidents and hazards for one (#7) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 15 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized a mechanical lift, as was care planned, when transferring Resident #7 from her wheelchair to her bed.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical Lift policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/21/26 at 6:48 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. It is not a substitute for manufacturer's training or instructions.At least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift.Mechanical lifts may be used for tasks the require lifting a resident from the floor, transferring a resident from bed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and resident interviews, the facility failed to promptly address and attempt to resolve resident group complaints and grievances concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility that were important to the residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents felt their concerns with call light timeliness resulting in long waits for staff assistance were addressed and resolved. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Council policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/17/24 at 6:04 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The purpose of the resident council is to provide a form for: residents families and resident representatives to input in the operation of the facility; discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and, disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents. A resident council response form will be utilized to track issues and their resolutions. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for four of ten resident rooms and one (#6) of two residents reviewed for accidents out of 26 sample residents, received adequate supervision to decrease and/or prevent risk for accident hazards. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure tap water in the facility was kept within a safe temperature range; -Initiate a timely fall care plan and interventions to prevent falls for Resident #6; and, -Ensure Resident #6's neurological assessments were completed after the resident sustained an unwitnessed fall in her room on 8/21/24. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure safe water temperatures A. Professional reference According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) Safety Alert, Avoiding Tap Water Scalds, retrieved on 10/23/24 from https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/5098-Tap-Water-Scalds.pdf, The majority of injuries and deaths involving tap water scalds are to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with food cooked and served in a manner that conserved nutritive value, flavor, appearance, texture and at an appetizing temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently serve foods at a palatable texture. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Critical Temperatures for Safe Food Handling policy, undated, was provided by the dietary manager (DM) on 10/17/24 at 5:44 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Temperature should be taken periodically to assure hot food stays above 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and cold food stays below 41 degrees F during the serving process. Maintain a cold enough holding temperature to assure foods are maintained at or below 41 degrees F until they leave the service area. The Food and Nutrition Services Staff policy, undated, was provided by the DM on 10/17/24 at 6:21 p.m. The policy read in part, Food will be palatable, attractive and served in a timely manner at proper temperatures. II. Resident interviews…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure safe and appropriate storage of food items in the pantry; and, -Ensure hand hygiene was conducted appropriately. Findings include: I. Failure to store food items appropriately in the the dry storage area A. Professional reference According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Is Food In Dented Cans Dangerous? (9/18/24) was retrieved on 10/22/24 from https://ask.usda.gov/s/article/Is-food-in-damaged-cans-dangerous, food from cans that were leaking, bulging, or badly dented should never be eaten. The damaged cans could contain clostridium botulinum (a toxic bacteria). B. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Nutrition Services Staff policy, undated, was provided by the dietary manager (DM) on 10/17/24 at 6:21 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The food service department is staffed by food and nutrition service personnel who have demonstrated the skills…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible developement and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to offer COVID-19 vaccinations and provide COVID-19 vaccination information to Resident #28, Resident #12, Resident #5 and Resident #17. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents policy, revised May 2023, was provided by corporate consultant (CC) #1 on 10/17/24 at 3:41 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, Residents who are eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine are strongly encouraged to do so. The resident or resident representative has the opportunity to accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine, and to change his/her decision. COVID-19 vaccine education, documentation and reporting are overseen by the infection preventionist and coordinated by his or her designee. Residents are screened for contraindications to the vaccine, medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#12) of one of 26 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #12's blood pressure was measured appropriately in accordance with medical standards of practice. Findings include: I. Professional reference How to measure your blood pressure at home fact sheet, dated 2020, was retrieved on 10/21/24 from the American Heart Association medical archives at https://www.heart.org/-/media/Files/Health-Topics/High-Blood-Pressure/measuringbpathome.pdf It documented that the blood pressure cuff should be positioned on the bare arm above the elbow in the middle of the arm. II. Facility policy and procedure The Blood Pressure, Measuring policy, revised September 2010, was provided by corporate consultant (CC) #1 on 10/17/24 at 3:41 p.m. It documented in pertinent part, Expose the resident's arm by rolling the sleeve up about five inches above the elbow. II. Observation On 10/17/24 at 8:42 a.m. registered nurse (RN) #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#15) of three residents reviewed for activities out of 26 sample residents received individualized activities in accordance with standards of care. Specifically, the facility failed to offer Resident #15 activities in Spanish, which was his preferred language. Findings include: I. Resident #15 A. Resident status Resident #15, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. According to the October 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included kidney failure, bipolar disorder and type 2 diabetes. According to the 7/17/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, Resident #15 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. He was independent in completing all activities of daily living. According to the 1/15/24 MDS assessment, it was very important for Resident #15 to have books, magazines and newspapers to read., listen to music he liked., do his favorite…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$5,293 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $5,293 — penalty dated 2023-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MADISON CREEK PARTNERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $748K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO