Boulder Creek Post Acute
12696 Monte Vista Road, Poway, CA 92064 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 149 certified beds · (858) 487-6242 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.26 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.66 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.2%CMS range 31.5–59.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.7–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.3–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.49 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 142.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for 28 of 28 sampled residents, when screws were observed protruding from handrails inside the facility. This failure had the potential to cause injury to all facility residents. Findings: On 2/13/25 and 2/14/25, observations were made of the handrails inside of the facility. A total of eight handrails were observed to have screws protruding through the interior aspect of the handrail. These screws were found to be at a height where an individual's hand grasping the handrail would contact the sharp end of the screw. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 3:36 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant 12 (CNA 12), CNA 12, upon touching the object, stated it was sharp, like a nail or screw. CNA 12 further stated it would definitely hurt someone. It should not be like that. During an interview on 2/13/24 at 3:40 P.M. with the Maintenance Director (MD), the MD stated That is probably a screw. That could hurt somebody. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 3:42 P.M. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation practices in dietary services were maintained with food storage, sanitation, and equipment maintenance according to standards of practice when: 1. One dented large can and two rusted large cans were found in the dry storage pantry. 2. A sink garbage disposal was not functioning and/or maintained in good working condition. 3. A frosting mix with a use by (U/B) date of 1/20/25 was found in the dry storage pantry. 4. Low-temperature dishwashing machine temperature did not reach sanitary temperature levels. These failures had the potential to cause widespread food borne illness among the 143 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 2/11/25 at 7:51 A.M., an initial kitchen tour was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). In the dry storage pantry area was a shelf of canned goods that displayed a dented, 10 ounce (oz) can of diced peaches stored alongside canned goods that were in good condition. On the back canned shelf area, there were two cans, each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure outdoor facility garbage and refuse (recyclable and non-recyclable trash) was not overflowing, and was secure with the dumpster's lids closed, for two facility dumpsters located outside the loading dock area near the kitchen hall exit. This failure had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings: On 2/11/25 at 8:21 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), outside the back kitchen hallway exit. There were two dumpsters outside the loading dock area with overfilled trash containing clear plastic trash bags with miscellaneous items, mixed with brown cardboard/packing boxes, filled to the top with a fully opened lid for both dumpsters. In addition, two wet, clear plastic bags were on the floor by dumpster two. The DS stated that the dumpsters were used for all facility trash that included the kitchen and resident and facility use. The DS stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control environment when the kitchen floor drain with food particles was observed infested with ants. This failure had the potential for ants to contaminate food and spread food-borne illnesses to all residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 143. Findings: According to the 2019 Centers for Disease Control, PEST CONTROL https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/media/pdfs/Guideline-Environmental-H.pdf, stated .Cockroaches, flies and maggots, ants, mosquitoes, spiders, mites, midges [small fly-like insects], and mice are among the typical arthropod [insects with hard bodies like a shell] and vertebrate [back bones] pest populations found in health-care facilities. Insects can serve as agents for the mechanical transmission of microorganisms [tiny living organisms that are harmful to humans such as bacteria, germs, or virus], or as active participants in the disease transmission process by serving as a vector [living organisms that can transmit infectious disease]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the transfer/discharge notice to the ombudsman's office when one of three reviewed discharged residents (Resident 139) required immediate transfer to an acute care hospital for urgent needs. This failure resulted in a lack of resident discharge notification to the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman representative and the potential advocate, to assist the resident with appeal rights. Findings: Resident 139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), per the admission Record. On 2/13/25 at 4:09 P.M., a review of Resident 139's clinical record was conducted. Resident 139's progress note indicated Resident 139 was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] at 18:15 [6:15 P.M.] for positive norovirus (a contagious virus that causes vomiting and diarrhea). On 2/13/25 at 4:20 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Medical Records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three reviewed discharged resident's (Resident 139) or his family member received a notice to request a bed hold when the resident was transferred to the acute care hospital. As a result, Resident 139 and/or his family member did not receive a written notice from the facility at the time of transfer, about the option to pay to hold the resident's bed. Findings: A review of Resident 139's admission Record indicated Resident 139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). On 2/13/25 at 4:09 P.M., a review of Resident 139's clinical record was conducted. Resident 139's progress note indicated Resident 139 was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] at 18:15 PM [6:15 P.M ] for positive norovirus (a contagious virus that causes vomiting and diarrhea). On 2/14/25 at 7:40 A.M., an interview and record review with licensed nurse (LN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reevaluate two of 30 sampled residents (2, 57) reviewed for mental health services. As a result, residents may have had unmet mental health needs. Findings: 1. Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per the admission Record, Resident 2 was diagnosed with major depressive disorder (a depressed mood impairing daily function) and schizoaffective disorder (a mental disconnection from reality) on 6/25/24. On 2/11/25 a review was conducted of Resident 2's electronic medical record. There was no documentation that a Level II Mental Health Evaluation (an evaluation for additional services for residents with mental illness) was conducted for Resident 2. On 2/13/25 at 1:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Minimum Data set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) nurse. The MDS nurse stated, Resident 2 should have been reviewed for a Level II Mental Health Evaluation when she was diagnosed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a high blood sugar reading for one of 30 sampled residents (23). As a result, Resident 23 had an increased risk of untreated symptoms of high blood sugar. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include, type 2 diabetes mellitus (unstable blood sugars). Per the facility's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 1/1/25 through 1/31/25, Resident 23 had an order for the physician to be notified of blood sugar readings greater than 290. Per the MAR, the following blood sugar readings were greater than 290. On 1/5/25 at 11:30 A.M., Resident 23's blood sugar was 322. On 1/8/25 at 4:30 P.M., Resident 23's blood sugar was 293. On 1/10/25 at 11:30 A.M., Resident 23's blood sugar was 337. On 1/11/25 at 11:30 A.M., Resident 23's blood sugar was 313. On 1/11/25 at 4:30 P.M., Resident 23's blood sugar was 294. On 1/19/25 at 11:30 A.M., Resident 23's blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement professional standards of care for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC: catheter [flexible plastic tubing] that is inserted into a vein in either arm and extends all the way to a location near the heart, where medication is delivered) dressing for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 340) receiving intravenous (IV: into the vein) medications, according to the facility's policies and procedures. This failure had the potential to expose Resident 340's PICC site to infections and lead to complications that may negatively impact the resident's health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 340's admission Record indicated Resident 340 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection). A record review of Resident 340's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 2/7/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care according to standards of practice for one of eight reviewed residents (Resident 38) on a nebulizer (a device that turns the liquid medicine into a mist which is then inhaled through a mouthpiece or a mask) treatment. As a result, Resident 38 was not properly monitored before and after nebulizer treatments were provided, and had the potential for ineffective nebulizer administration, respiratory complications, and infections that increased the risk of negative health outcomes. Findings: A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated Resident 38 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). A record review of Resident 38's Minimum data set (MDS; nursing facility assessment tool) dated 12/23/24 indicated that Resident 38 was rarely or never understood with severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to a pharmacist recommendation related to high levels of fat in the blood, for one of 30 sampled residents (23). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 23's health and well-being. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood). On 2/14/25 a review of the facility's Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review, dated 12/5/24, was conducted. This record included a recommendation for the facility to provide a lipid panel (check the level of fat in the blood) for Resident 23. There was no documentation that the facility responded to the pharmacists's recommendation. On 2/14/25 a review of Resident 23's electronic medical record was conducted. There was no evidence that a lipid panel was completed for Resident 23. On 2/14/25 at 1:20 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document a resident's medications on the weekly summary for one of 30 sampled residents (2). This failure had the potential to miscommunicate Resident 2's status, care, and treatment. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder (a mental disconnection from reality). On 2/14/25 a review of Resident 2's electronic medical record was conducted. Licensed nurse (LN) 21 completed the weekly summary for Resident 2 on 1/12/25, 1/19/25, 1/26/25, and 2/9/25. On all of the listed weekly summaries, LN 21 documented that Resident 2 had not been using antipsychotic (medication to treat a disconnection from reality) medication over the last seven days. Per the facility's Orders, there was an order dated 6/20/24 for Resident 2 to take risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) for schizoaffective disorder. On 2/14/25 at 10:17 A.M., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote infection control practices according to standards of practice for one or 30 sampled residents (Resident 38) to prevent respiratory illnesses and infection. This failure had the potential for Resident 38 to experience respiratory complications and infections from improper maintenance and storage of their nebulizer treatment equipment. Findings: A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated Resident 38 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). A record review of Resident 38's minimum data set (MDS; nursing facility assessment tool) dated 12/23/24 indicated that Resident 38 was rarely or never understood with severe cognitive (the mental processes that take place in the brain, including thinking, attention, language, learning, memory, and perception) deficits to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure handrails were appropriately secured. This failure had the potential to cause injury to all facility residents. Findings: On 2/13/25 and 2/14/25, observations were made of the handrails inside of the facility. One loose handrail was observed. The ends of the handrail moved in both directions from level. During an interview on 2/13/25 at 9:38 A.M. with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 11, CNA 11 stated the handrails should not move like that. CNA 11 further stated a resident could get really hurt if it tilted while they were holding it. During an interview on 2/14/25 at 9:40 A.M. with licensed nurse (LN) 11, LN 11 stated that the residents used the handrails for support. LN 11 further stated, not being secured could cause a major injury. During a review of the facility's policy titled Maintenance Service, the policy indicated .2. Functions of Maintenance personnel include .b. Maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards .
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a self administration recommendation for one resident (Resident 3) when a licensed nurse (LN 1) left medications which were not approve for self medication administration on Resident 3' s bedside table. As a result, the unattended medications on Resident 3's bedside table were not witnessed as administered as ordered. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility admission Record. A review of the admission orders dated 8/6/24 indicated Resident 3 was approved to self administer the following medications: topical diclofenac pain gel and cyclosporine eye drops for dry eyes. On 1/13/25 at 4:39 P.M. an interview and review of Resident 3's medication orders was conducted with LN 1 and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). LN 1 stated on 12/31/24, she left the following medications aspirin, furosemide and two vitamins on Resident 3's bedside table. LN 1 stated after she left the unattended medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident's (Resident 4) baseline care plan (detailed plan with information about a patient's treatment, goal, and interventions) for one of one resident reviewed, related to the placement of a used urinal on top of the meal tray table. As a result, the lack of resident centered care plan with specific interventions to prevent contamination of the surface and the lack of education to Resident 4 had the potential for Resident 4 to acquire an infection. Findings: An unannounced onsite to the facility was conducted on 7/9/24 related to a complaint on physical environment and infection control. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes (high blood sugar), per the facility's admission Record. On 7/9/24, Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 4's history and physical dated 5/18/24 indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 4's minimum data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program when a used urinal was placed on top of the resident's meal tray table for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for contamination of the surface and could cause an infection to Resident 1. Findings: An unannounced onsite to the facility was conducted on 7/9/24 related to a complaint on physical environment and infection control. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included aftercare following a surgery and diabetes (high blood sugar), per the facility's admission Record. On 7/9/24, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 1's history and physical dated 5/18/24 indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 5/28/24 indicated Resident 1 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS, ability to recall) score was 15/15 (a score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully implement their post fall protocol for a resident who self -reported a fall. This had the potential to compromise the safety and well-being of Resident 1. Findings: On 11/03/23 the Department of Public Health received a complaint of a fall for Resident 1 on 11/03/23. On 11/15/23, Resident 1 ' s records were reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include osteoarthritis of knee (swelling of knee joints), syncope (passing out) and collapse, opioid dependence (drug for pain relief and causing sleepiness) per the facility admission Record. A review of Resident 1 ' s facility record indicated on 11/3/23 at 1:00 A.M., .Resident came down to nurses station mobile wheelchair stating he fell on his buttocks in his room at his bedside no c/o[sic] pain/discomfort v/s[sic] wnl[sic] breathing even and unlabored neurochecks initiated RN/MD[sic] made aware . Fall risk evaluation on 3/2/21 was 19, high risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-05-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call bell system alerted staff to a resident requesting an assistant when the call bell system only lighted up. As a result, call light may not have been answered in a timely manner. Findings: On 5/17/22 at 8:55 A.M., Resident 12 was interviewed. Resident 12 stated, I had to wait 2 hours to be changed after pressing the call light. On 5/17/22 at 9:535 A.M., Resident 46 was interviewed. Resident 46 stated, I waited 1 hour for the call bell to be answered. On 5/17/22 at 9:50 A.M., Resident 90 was interviewed. Resident 90 stated that his roommate waited 3 hours for someone to answer the call light. On 5/17/22 at 9:18 A.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] was toured. The resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] required assistance and the in room call bell was activated. There was no audible alert to the call bell, and the call light outside of room did not light up. The Social Services Director was just outside the room, and she stated the call bell had no audible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow the resident council to meet without staff. As a result, the residents were not able have a confidential meeting. Finding: On 5/18/22 at 10:30 A.M., a resident council meeting was held. During the meeting, a majority consensus of confidential residents attending stated that they could not meet without a staff member present. Residents stated Activity Director (AD) insisted to attend all meetings. On 5/18/22 at 12:04 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Activity Director (AD). The AD stated that she needed to attend resident council meetings to take the meeting minutes. She stated that a staff present at the meeting might make the residents uncomfortable with expressing their concerns openly. The AD's expectation was that the residents had the right to run the meeting themselves without staff present. On 5/20/22 at 2:28 P.M., an interview with the ADM was conducted. ADM stated that staff present at all the meetings could make the residents uncomfortable speaking honestly about the facility. He stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the residents and staff on how to file a grievance. As a result, residents were not able to exercise their rights to file a grievance. Findings: On 5/18/22 at 10:30 A.M., a resident council meeting was conducted. The following statements about grievances were made: 1. The majority of residents attending stated that they did not know how to file a grievance or were unable to file a grievance. 2. CR 1 stated that they could not get a grievance form when she asked the nurses for one. She went to every nurses' station and was unable to get a form. She wrote a grievance on a blank sheet of paper and handed that to the staff, but she was afraid that the staff would read her paper. 3. CR 2 stated that they were afraid of speaking up or writing a grievance out of fear of retribution by the facility. 4. CR 3 stated they thought the Social Services director was too busy to respond to grievances, so they didn't bother writing them. 5. CR 4 stated that they had made grievances but had never received rationale back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure infection prevention in facility when: 1. The facility did not clean up feces on residents' floor. 2. The facility did not ensure unvaccinated staff wore proper PPE in a transmission-based precaution room. 3. The facility did not ensure screeners performed Covid screening on vendors and doctors. These failures had the potential for infection to spread in the facility. Findings: 1. On 5/17/22 at 2 P.M., a concurrent interview with Resident 63 and observation of his room was conducted. He stated that there was often feces on the floor, and under closer inspection it was determined that at time of observation, it was observed there was smeared brown material in the middle of the floor. On 5/17/22 at 2:25 P.M., a concurrent interview and observation with the IP was conducted. The IP observed smeared brown material. She stated that the expectation was that feces should cleaned off the floor as soon as it was seen by staff. She stated that by not cleaning the floors of feces, there could be a spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect was provided for two of two sampled residents ( 50 &110) when staff was standing over, while assisting and feeding the residents (50 &110). This failure had the potential to affect the resident's self-esteem, self-worth, and quality of care. Findings: 1. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), per the facility's admission Record. On 5/18/22 at 12:35 P.M., a lunch observation was conducted in front of Resident 50's room. Resident 50 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 30 was standing over while assisting and feeding Resident 50. On 5/18/22 at 12:40 P.M., an interview with CNA 30 was conducted. CNA 30 stated she was standing over while feeding Resident 50 because there was no chair in the room. She stated the expectation was to sit while assisting the residents with meals. 2. Resident 110 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent from a physician prior to administering psychotropic medications (a medication which affects the mind) and did not obtain a consent from responsible party prior to applying restraints (a measure that keeps resident within limits) for two of two sampled residents (126 & 54 ). As a result, the residents may not have been fully informed of the risks and benefits of the psychotropic medications and restraints. Findings: 1. Resident 126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder) and anxiety (a mental disorder characterized by excessive worrisome), per the facility's admission Record. Per facility's Physician Order, the physician wrote an order for Resident 126 for venlafaxine (medication for depression) for depression and lorazepam (medication for anxiety) for anxiety. On 5/19/22 at 3:43 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review with LN 31 was conducted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for two of two sampled residents (63& 90). As a result the residents did not feel comfortable in their room. Findings: On 5/17/22 at 12:58 P.M., a concurrent interview and observation of Resident 90 in his room was conducted. Resident 90 stated that the NOC shift staff often threw dirty linen and diapers on the floor when cleaning them. Grime and dirt were noted around the floor at the edges of the bed, by bed wheels and also by the residents' drawers. It was noted that the walls had torn drywall and scraped paint in many areas behind his bed. Resident 90 stated that the wall had been damaged by the bed and mechanical lift (resident lifting device) going into the wall. He stated he had not seen anyone clean the room in a while. On 5/17/22 at 2 P.M., a concurrent interview and observation of Resident 63 in his room was conducted. Resident 63 was Resident 90's roommate. Resident 63 stated the only problem he had with the facility was that his room was dirty and there was often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (54) was free from restraints that the restraint was the least restrictive, used for the least amount of time, and was re-evaluated when they repeatedly applied mittens to both hands. As a result, resident 54 was subject to an unnecessary restraint. Findings: On 5/19/22, at 9:44 A.M., Resident 54, was observed awake in bed with mittens on both hands. Resident 54 was constantly moving his hands in an attempt to remove the mittens and trying to scratch. Resident 54's clinical record was reviewed on 5/19/22, there was a note from the dermatologist dated 4/27/22, to keep mittens on bilateral hands to prevent patient from scratching. There was a single care plan developed for the use of the mittens. The care plan only directed staff to monitor every shift for breakdown and placement. There was no care plan or assessment or consent or orders found in the record for the mittens as a restraint. On 5/19/22 at 3:04 P.M., the MDS Coordinator was interviewed. The MDS coordinator stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (54) was free from restraints. In addition, the facility did not ensure a resident's restraint was least restricted alternative for the least amount of time and re-evaluated, when they repeatedly applied mittens to both hands. As a result, resident 54 was subject to an unnecessary restraint. Findings: On 5/19/22, At 9:44 A.M., Resident 54, was observed awake in bed with mittens on both hands. Resident 54 was constantly moving his hands in an attempt to remove the mittens and trying to scratch. Resident 54's clinical record was reviewed on 5/19/22, there was a note from the dermatologist dated 4/27/22 to keep mittens on bilateral hands to prevent patient from scratching. There was a single care plan developed for the use of the mittens the care plan only directed staff to monitor every shift for breakdown and placement. There was no care plan or assessment or consent or orders found in the record for the mittens as a restraint. On 5/19/22 at 3:04 P.M., the MDS Coordinator was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (54) restraint use was documented on the MDS (assessment tool that directs resident care). As result, Resident 54's mittens were not correctly identified. Findings: On 5/19/22, At 9:44 A.M., Resident 54, was observed awake in bed with mittens on both hands. Resident 54 was constantly moving his hands in an attempt to remove the mittens and trying to scratch. Resident 54's clinical record was reviewed on 5/19/22. A note from the dermatologist, dated 4/27/22, indicated to keep mittens on bilateral hands to prevent patient from scratching. There was a single care plan developed for the use of the mittens the care plan only directed staff to monitor every shift for breakdown and placement. There was nothing on the most recent MDS to indicate Resident 54 had mittens. On 5/19/22 at 3:04 P.M., the MDS Coordinator was interviewed. The MDS coordinator stated the mittens were not a restraint, they were to stop him from scratching. The MDS coordinator felt the mittens were for safety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was provided for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 104). As a result, Resident 104's hearing loss was not addressed. Findings: Per the admission record, Resident 104 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area). Resident 104 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of mental status, mental status assessment; score 8-12, moderately impaired cognition, 13-15 intact cognition) of 10. On 5/17/22 at 8:45 A.M., Resident 104 was observed in her room laying in bed. Resident 104 was interviewed at this time. Resident 104 stated, I can't hear you. Come closer. My ears are plugged. I can't hear you. On 5/17/22 at 8:50 A.M, the CNA 21 who was assigned to Resident 104 was interviewed. CNA 21 stated, You have to talk loud. She's hard of hearing. On 5/18/22 at 8 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for a Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) dining program as ordered for one of one sampled resident (102). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 102 to lose more weight. Findings: Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (damage to the brain), dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), and adult failure to thrive (poor nutrition and weight loss) per the facility's admission Record. Per Resident 1's Physician Order Summary Report, dated 5/19/22, the physician wrote an order for RNA RDP [restorative dining program] for all meals on 4/8/22. On 5/18/22 at 8:30 A.M., Resident 102's breakfast observation was conducted in the room. There was a breakfast tray with slightly eaten pureed pancake on the bedside table in front of Resident 102. No staff was observed during breakfast in the room. On 5/18/22 at 1:03 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to safely position one of two sampled resident (Resident 104) during a meal. This deficient practice put Resident 104 at risk for choking and aspiration. Findings: Per the admission Record, Resident 104 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain tissues which cause parts of the brain to die off) affecting left non-dominant side. On 05/17/22 at 8:45 A.M., during a meal observation, Resident 104 was observed in her room. Resident 104 was awake, on her right side with the head of her bed at a 20 degree angle. Resident 104 was observed using her right hand to attempt to feed herself as she slowly reached for the food on her tray. On 05/17/22 at 8:50 A.M., CNA 21 was interviewed. CNA 21 stated, The head of the bed should be higher and she should be closer to her tray. On 05/17/22 at 9 A.M., the activities assistant (AA) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide one of 26 sampled resident (33) who was non-English speaking resident with a communication board. As a result, the resident had difficulty communicating with staff. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including Respiratory Failure ( a condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) per facility's admission record. Record review of MDS Section C, Cognitive Patterns was conducted. Resident 33 had a BIMS score(Brief Interview of mental status, mental status assessment; score 8-12, moderately impaired cognition, 13-15 intact cognition) of 10. On 5/18/22 at 12:48 P.M., an interview and observation of Resident 33 was conducted. Resident 33 stated he preferred to speak Spanish, but understood a lot of English. He was able to respond in single word responses in Spanish, but some garbling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure midline catheter (a catheter placed into a vein in the upper arm) dressing was changed accordance to the facility's policy for one of 26 sampled resident (55). As a result, Resident 55 was placed at risk for infection. Findings: Resident 55 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes (illness with high blood sugar level), per the facility's admission Record. Per facility's progress note, dated 5/4/22, Resident 55 had a midline on the left upper arm upon admission to the facility. On 5/17/22 at 3:55 P.M., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident 55. Resident 55 was observed in bed with a dressing dated 5/3, covering a vascular access device on the left upper arm. Resident 55 stated the dressing had never been changed since she arrived at the facility. On 5/18/22 at 10:08 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 55's midline dressing was conducted with LN 30. LN 30 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post their actual staffing hours when they only posted projected staffing for the day. As a result, due to changes in staffing these numbers may have been incorrect. Findings: On 5/18/22 at 10:30 A. M., the facility Administrator was asked for posted staffing information for the last 2 weeks including today. The DON presented posted staffing information for 5/1/22 to 5/14/22, at that time the DON was asked for actual staffing hours as the information provided was only the projected staffing. The DON provided the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day, for this period. This form contained the actual staffing for each day. On 5/10/22, the Projected Boulder Creek Post Acute Care, documented the total staff hours as 476.5, the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day documented the actual hours as 448.57, a difference of 29 staffing hours. On 5/11/22, the Projected Boulder Creek Post Acute Care, documented the total staff hours as 468, the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use the correct scoop size for vegetables during tray line. As a result, the residents did not receive the appropriate amount of vegetables served. Findings: On 5/18/22 at 11:45 A.M., the CK was observed placing scoops with different colored handles next to the food inserts on the steam table. CK was interviewed at this time. CK stated, The gray scoop, #8 will be used for the (starch), the green scoop, #12 will be used for the vegetables, a gray scoop, #8 will be used for pureed meat. Tray line started production at 11:50 A.M., and ended at 12:58 P.M. On 5/18/22 at 1:30 P.M., the CK was interviewed. The CK stated, The gray scoops are equal to 4 ounces, the green scoops are equal to 3 ounces. On 5/18/22 at 3 P.M., a concurrent record review and interview was conducted with the DS. The DS stated, The cook's spreadsheet indicates, the vegetables should have been served with a gray scoop which is equal to 4 ounces. The cook used a green scoop which is 3 ounces. We should have used a 4 ounce scoop. On 5/19/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable. As a result the residents did not enjoy their food and had the potential to skip meals. Findings: On 5/18/22 at 10:30 A.M., during the resident council meeting, 12 of 12 residents complained about the food. On 5/18/22 at 11:45 A.M., trayline was observed. At 12:58 P.M., the last tray on the trayline was taken to station one. A test tray was requested and tasted by the survey team and DS. The menu included Garden Fresh Meatloaf and gravy, mashed potatoes, Spinach AuGratin, garlic bread and chocolate peanut butter bars. The potatoes, spinach, bread and dessert were found to be palatable. The tasters found the meatloaf and gravy to have an unusually sweet taste. On 5/18/22 at 2:30 P.M., Resident 39 stated, The gravy had an off taste. It did not taste like gravy, I didn't like it. On 5/19/22 at 2:30 P.M., the DS was interviewed. The DS stated, The gravy was a little sweet. The DS further stated, I interviewed the cook. He said he added a little brown sugar to the gravy to take away…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent residents from using multiple power strips plugged directly into each other. As a result, the facility had increased potential risk for electrical fire. Findings: On 5/17/22 at 9:50 A.M., a concurrent interview and observation was conducted of Resident 90's room. It was observed that Resident 90 had at least 3 power strips plugged into each other from one wall outlet. Resident 90 stated he had a lot of electronics that he liked to keep plugged in to charge. Resident 90 stated that the facility was aware that he used multiple power strips in this manner. On 5/18/22 at 9:45 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 44's room was conducted with the MS. Five medical equipments were all plugged into one power strips. The MS stated Resident 44's power strip was non-medical grade power strip and should not had been any medical equipments plugged in. On 5/19/22 at 9:45 A.M., a concurrent interview and observation was done of Resident 90's power strip setup with the MS. The MS stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the handrails in the hallway was safe for the residents, staff, and visitors. This failure had the potential for all residents using the handrails to be at risk for injuries. Findings: On 5/18/22 at 12:26 P.M., a handrail on the hallway in station 1 across from room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a square shaped plastic patched on the original handrail. The edges of the plastic patch had rough and sharp edges upon touch. On 5/19/22 at 11:20 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview with MS was conducted. The MS stated the handrail across from room [ROOM NUMBER] was patched up with rough edges and it was not safe for the residents. The MS stated this needed to be taped until the new parts came in. He further stated the maintenance did environmental rounds on each station but was not aware of this handrail's condition. On 5/20/22 at 9:48 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-center care plans to reflect four of 31 residents individual needs related to: 1. Resident 20's need for Range of Motion (ROM-staff assisted movement of the joints); 2. Resident 77's podiatry care and treatment; 3. Resident 65's dental needs; and, 4. Resident 51's use of a seat belt, when sitting up in his wheelchair. As a result, there was the potential for residents to receive inconsistent care due staff being unaware of the residents specific needs and the interventions required to meet those needs. Findings: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. On 10/28/19 at 8:19 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted of Resident 20. Resident 20 was in bed eating breakfast, with a fall mat on the floor. Resident 20 stated she preferred to stay in bed, because she did not feel strong enough to get out of bed. On 10/28/19, a record review was conducted for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the pureed recipe for fried rice for 22 of 22 residents reviewed for pureed diet. As a result, the nutrition of the pureed diets was compromised potentially affecting residents' health. Findings: On 10/28/19, the weekly menu was obtained from the facility. The menu for 10/29/19 was listed with the following starch: Fried Rice. On 10/29/19 at 11:40 A.M., the pureed starch had already been prepared, and was on the tray line for plating. The pureed fried rice appeared to be a bright white color. The regular fried rice appeared brownish with green peas. Near the end of tray line, a test tray ( a sample tray) was requested for both a regular diet and a pureed diet. After the final tray was served to a resident in unit 3, the test tray was removed from the transport cart. The RD 1, DNS, and this writer sampled the starch on the sample tray. The pureed starch had a thick white appearance and did not have the same flavor as the fried rice from the regular diet. On 10/29/19 at 1:55 P.M., an interview with CK 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not follow the recipe for pureed fried rice or for pureed carrots for 22 of 22 residents reviewed for pureed diet. As a result, 22 residents were served rice which was bland and carrots which were not seasoned per the recipes. Findings: On 10/28/19, the weekly menu was obtained from the facility. The lunch menu for 10/29/19 was listed with the following starch: Fried Rice. On 10/29/19 at 11:40 A.M., the pureed starch had already been prepared, and was on the tray line for plating. The pureed fried rice appeared to be a bright white color. The fried rice appeared brownish with green peas. Near the end of tray line, a test tray (a sample tray) was requested for both a regular diet and a pureed diet. After the final tray was served to a resident in unit 3, the test tray was removed from the transport cart. RD 1, DNS, and this writer sampled the starch from the test tray. The pureed starch had a thick white appearance and did not have the same flavor as the fried rice from the sampled regular diet. RD 1 and the DNS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not display respect for residents when: 1. Staff did not announce themselves for one of 31 residents when entering one resident's room; (77) 2. Staff were rude and disrespectful to Resident 28 and staff spoke non-English in the presence of eight of eight CR residents. (28, CR 1, CR 2, CR 3, CR 4, CR 5, CR 6, CR 7, CR 8) These failures had the potential to devalue the residents' self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: 1. Per the facility's policy, titled Quality of Life-Dignity, dated August 2009, . 11.Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed by: .b. Promptly responding to the resident's request for toileting assistance . On 10/31/19 11:29 A.M. an observation was conducted with LN 3. LN 3 was followed into Resident 77's room, to examine a wound. LN 3 entered Resident 77's room without knocking or asking permission to enter. On 10/31/19 at 11:31 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 3 outside Resident 77's room. LN 3 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for one of two residents (50) reviewed for advanced directives. This failure had the potential for Resident 50 to not get her wishes met when receiving life-sustaining treatment. Findings: Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) per the facility's admission Record. On 10/30/19, a review of Resident 50's paper chart was conducted. Resident 50's POLST, dated 11/25/15, indicated selective treatment, goal of treating medical conditions while voiding burdensome measures, was selected and signed by the physician on 11/25/15. On 10/30/19, a review of Resident 50's hospice documents, located in a separate binder, was conducted. Resident 50's POLST, dated 11/25/15, indicated revised as of 8/13/19-new one to be signed by the MD. Selective treatment was crossed out,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meal assistance to one of five residents (17) reviewed for ADLs. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 17 to experience a decrease in ADLs and weight loss. Findings: Resident 17 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) and muscle weakness per the facility's admission Record. On 10/30/19, a review of Resident 17's MDS (an assessment tool) Section C, dated 10/14/19, indicated Resident 17's BIMS Summary Score (test for cognitive function) was 2 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 10/28/19 at 8:26 A.M., an observation and interview with Resident 17 was conducted. Resident 17 was lying in her bed, with a breakfast tray on her bedside table. The bedside table was angled away from Resident 17. The food on the tray was uncovered, and two drinks on the tray had plastic covering the tops of them. Resident 17 stated she could not eat on her own and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement a physician's order for an ophthalmology (a doctor with specialization of eye treatment including surgery) referral for one of three residents reviewed for vision (59). As a result, Resident 59 had the potential for low vision or decreased vision. Findings: Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's admission Record. On 10/28/19 at 1:01 P.M., an interview with Resident 59 was conducted. Resident 59 stated she had been asking staff about her eye appointment, but had not received any response. On 10/29/19 at 4:07 P.M., an interview with the SSD was conducted. The SSD stated she had to check the Optometrist (provides eye health/ may provide glasses) book. The SSD stated she did not make ophthalmology appointments for residents. On 10/30/19 at 11:30 A.M., an interview with the SSD was conducted. The SSD stated she had not followed up on the appointment for Resident 59 because she had another priority to deal with first.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Restorative Nursing Services (RNA-CNAs with specialized training to help improve residents' strength and mobility), as ordered by their physician for one of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (20) This failure had the potential to affect Resident 20's highest level of function and possible result in avoidable decline of Range of Motion (ROM). Findings: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included heart failure (heart can't pump blood to the rest of the body with enough force), per the facility's admission record. On 10/28/19 at 8:19 A.M., Resident 20 was observed and interviewed. Resident 20 was in bed eating breakfast. Resident 20 stated she preferred to stay in bed, because she did not feel strong enough to get out of bed. On 10/28/19. Resident 20's clinical record was reviewed. The quarterly MDS (an assessment tool), dated 7/22/19, indicated a BIMS (a cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed asess two of three residents reviewed for accident hazards (51, ) when: 1. Resident 51 had not documentation or assessment for a safety device and, These failures had the potential to result in physical harm. Findings: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a disorder that affects movement) and dementia (decline in memory, language, and other thinking skills) per the facility's admission Record. On 10/30/19, a review of Resident 51's MDS (health status screening and assessment tool) Section C, dated 8/16/19, indicated Resident 51 had severe cognitive impairment for daily decision making. On 10/28/19 at 8:58 A.M., an observation of Resident 51 was conducted in his room. Resident 51 was sitting in his wheelchair and a two-point seatbelt was observed buckled across his hips. On 10/29/19 at 8:11 A.M., an observation of Resident 51 was conducted in his room. Resident 51 was sitting in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four residents reviewed for urinary catheters and urinary infections had: 1. Secured urinary catheters (a device inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage tubes for Residents 45 and 279, 2. A urinal (a plastic container used to collect urine) provided to Resident 6 to promote independence. These failure had the potential for the urinary catheters to be pulled out of the urinary canal which would cause pain. There was the potential for Resident 65 to have a urinary infection that went untreated, and for Resident 6 to not achieve their highest practicability of independence when a urinal was not routinely provided. Findings: 1a. Resident 45 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included obstructive uropathy (urine can't be expelled from the urinary system due to some type of obstruction), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 45's clinical record was conducted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor one of five residents reviewed for nutrition (78). As a result Resident 78 experienced altered nutrition and experienced a significant weight loss. Findings: On 10/28/19 at 9:52 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 78. Resident 78 stated although he had a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube) in place, recently the tube was no longer used to provide nutrition to his body since he started eating by mouth. Resident 78 stated the facility had not weighed him since the beginning of the month. On 10/30/19 at 1:21 P.M., LN 13 was interviewed. LN 13 stated his appetite was coming back now that he was eating by mouth. Resident 78's record was reviewed: Per the Weights and Vitals Summary document dated 10/31/19. Resident weights were as follows: 8/1/19 174 lbs 9/1/19 172 lbs 10/01/19 159 lbs Resident 78's weight from 9/1/19 to 10/1/19 was not recorded on the summary document. Per Resident 78's care plan dated 2/26/19: Focus: At risk for losing weight .Goal: minimize any unplanned weight changes daily, Interventions:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were implemented when a physician's order was not followed for the use of a humidifier (moisturized oxygen) with oxygen for one of three residents (62) reviewed for respiratory care. This failure caused Resident 62 to have an dry throat. Findings: Resident 62 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive lung disease characterized by shortness of breath, wheezing, or a chronic cough), and the need for supplemental oxygen per the facility's admission Record. Resident 62's clinical record was reviewed on 10/31/19. The Order Summary Report, dated 10/31/19, indicated an order was initiated on 7/9/19 for Humidified oxygen at 2 LPM (liters per minute) via Nasal Cannula (device to deliver oxygen directly into the nostrils) every shift for COPD. On 10/28/19 at 8:30 A.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (16, 49) reviewed for pain were administered adequate pain medication when: 1. Resident 16 did not receive a physician ordered Lidocaine (slowly released pain medication) patch as scheduled five times in October 2019 and, 2. Resident 49 did not receive adequate pain medication for scheduled pressure ulcer and range of motion (ROM - exercises to decrease contractures, defined as shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity) treatments. These failures placed both Residents' 16 and 49 at risk for unnecessary pain. Findings: 1. Resident 16 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fibromyalgia (causes aching and deep stabbing pain) per the facility's admission Record. Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed on 10/29/19. The Order Summary Sheet, dated 10/31/19, indicated an order was initiated on 10/8/19 for a Lidocaine patch 5%, Apply to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the narcotic count inventory sheet (CDR) reflected the medications administered to residents as documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR), for one of two residents (20) reviewed for medication storage. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the facility to not be able to readily identify loss and drug diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs as their use for unintended purposes) of controlled medication. Findings: On 10/29/19 at 10:41 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 1 during inspection of medication cart #2, located at Station One. A random narcotic bubble pack card (a method of packaging medications, where each dose is enclosed in a clear plastic bubble, on a cardboard sheet) was removed for inspection. The narcotic bubble back was assigned to Resident 110, and labeled Percocet 10-325 milligrams tablets. LN 1 stated 36 tablets remained sealed in the bubble pack card. On 10/29/19 at 11:23 A.M., Resident 110's CDR for October 2019, was compared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) psychotropic (mind altering) medications were limited to 14 days (unless documentation of a physician's order to extend the medication), for one of five residents (15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure put Resident 15 at risk for complications resulting from potentially unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss) with behavioral disturbances, per the facility's admission record. On 10/31/19, Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. The physician order, dated 8/3/19, indicated, Lorazepam (antipsychotic medication used to treat anxiety) be administered as needed for anxiety. The physician's order included behavior monitoring every shift, for episodes of agitation manifested by chasing and hitting staff. Resident 15's MAR was reviewed from 8/3/19 through 10/31/19. Lorazepam was administered three times, with documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to secure medications when: 1. Medications were left unattended at the beside for one of 31 sampled residents (20); and 2. One of three treatment carts was left unlocked and unattended. These failures had the potential for staff, residents, or visitors to have access to medication not attended for them. 1. On 10/28/19 at 8:19 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 20. Resident 20 was sitting up in bed, eating breakfast. A small clear medication cup was on the bedside table, which contained a small oval yellow pill and a small oval pink pill. Resident 20 stated she was supposed to take the pills. No staff were in the room and a medication cart was not visible outside the resident's room. On 10/28/19 at 8:22 A.M., LN 3 was observed entering Resident 20's room. On 10/28/19 at 8:24 A.M., a subsequent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 20. Resident 20 was sitting up in bed and her breakfast tray was gone.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 31 sampled residents (65), reviewed for dental needs, was provided dental services to meet the resident's needs. This deficient practice had a potential for Resident 65 to experience difficulty chewing and weight loss, due to not having any teeth or dentures. Findings: Resident 65 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included difficulty walking and lack of coordination, per the facility's admission Record. On 10/28/19 at 8:54 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 65, while he sat in a wheel chair beside his bed. Resident 65 had no teeth or dentures in his mouth. A partially consumed breakfast tray sat on a near-by table. Resident 65 stated he had been without teeth for over a year. Resident 65 stated when he arrived, they said they would try to get him dentures. Resident 65 stated he had not seen a dentist since he arrived. On 10/30/19, a record review was conducted for Resident 65: Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements were followed when: 1. Dented cans were not removed from stock, 2. Juices were not labeled or dated and, 3. Staff did not wear a beard restraint in the kitchen. As a result, residents were subject to bacterial illness and foodborne illnesses from dented cans, undated juices, and potential hair falling into residents' food. Findings: 1. On 10/28/19 at 7:50 A.M., the dry storage area of the kitchen was inspected. One can of peaches had an indentation in the middle of the can. One can of tuna had two accordion dents in the can. On 10/28/19 at 7:51 A.M., an interview with the DNS was conducted. The DNS stated all dented cans must be removed and placed in the bin for return to the supplier. Per the facility policy, Food Storage-Dented Cans, dated 2018, .All dented cans (defined as side seam or or rim dents) and rusty can are to be separated from remaining stock and placed in a specified labeled area for return to purveyor for refund . 2. On 10/29/19 at 8:10 A.M., a joint observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure CNA 31 had a current professional license. This failure created the potential for the facility to be unaware of an active disciplinary action against CNA 31. Findings: On [DATE], a record review was conducted of CNA 31's employee file. CNA 31's date of hire with the facility was [DATE]. The California Department of Public Health L&C (Licensing and Certification) Verification Detail Page, dated [DATE], indicated CNA 31's license was effective on [DATE], had a criminal record clearance, and CNA 31 was deemed employable. The Verification Detail page indicated CNA 31's license expired on [DATE]. A review of the Daily Staffing Assignments which included the employee's sign in with signatures that indicated CNA 31 had signed in and worked 19 shifts since [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:38 A.M., a joint interview was conducted with the ADM and the DSD. The ADM confirmed CNA 31 was employed by the facility and was working shifts. The ADM acknowledged CNA 31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document two of two residents reviewed for resident documentation when: 1. Resident 77's toenail treatment was documented as being performed according to the physician's order; and, 2. Resident 429's did not have an accurate fall assessment completed, after a recent fall. As a result, Resident 77 and Resident 429 were at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and treatment. Findings: 1. Resident 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Records. On 10/28/19 at 10:27 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 77, while he laid in bed. Resident 77 stated a podiatrist (foot doctor) came to see him last week for a toe issue. Resident 77 stated the podiatrist ordered a treatment, saying he needed to soak the toe every other day, or else he would lose his toenail, due to an infection. Resident 77 stated the staff had not yet soaked his toe and he was afraid his toe infection would get worse. On 10/29/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure infection control practices were followed when: 1. Hand hygiene was not performed by 2 of 6 CNAs ( CNA 8, CNA 35) during a meal service when passing meal trays to residents in the dining room and, 2. A CPAP mask (continuous positive air pressure - provides air pressure to keep lung airways open) was left lying on the bedside table open to potential infection for one of two residents reviewed for respiratory care (62). As a result, there was a potential to transmit infectious agents between residents during food service and the potential for the CPAP mask to pick up germs from the bedside table potentially causing Resident 62 to become sick when using the mask. Findings: 1. On 10/28/19 at 12 P.M., a lunch observation was conducted in the residents' dining room. There was one hand wash sink and only one bottle of hand sanitizer observed in the dining room, during the meal service. The one bottle of hand sanitizer observed was on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MADISON CREEK PARTNERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHIEF JOSEPH TRAIL, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/02/2026 |
| TIPPET, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/02/2026 |
| WHITE CANYON, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/02/2026 |
| CLEGG, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/02/2026 |
| IKERD, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/02/2026 |
| MADISON CREEK PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/20/2015 |
| CHANG, ALAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2004 |
| CHRISTENSEN, COVEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/20/2015 |
| HOPKINS, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| MASON, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555206. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.