Sundance Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 99% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 60.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision out of 14 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not able to access hazardous chemicals.Resident #1, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a history of dementia and of wandering within the facility. On [DATE] at 1:40 p.m., Resident #1 was able to obtain a bottle of a cleaning chemical that was located in a residential hallway on a maintenance cart that was unsecured and unsupervised.Resident #1 was found by certified nurse aide (CNA) #1 holding the bottle containing a cleaning chemical. Resident #1 was observed to have a blue substance on his lips, which was determined by the facility to be consistent with the contents of the bottle.Resident #1 was reported to have mouth and stomach pain after the incident. He was evaluated by a physician at the facility immediately following the incident and transferred…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clean linens were provided to residents on a daily basis. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure clean hand towels and washcloths were provided to residents.Findings include:I. ObservationsObservations made throughout the survey (from 2/23/26 to 2/26/26) revealed there were no towel racks inside the residents' bathrooms. On 2/23/26 at 3:38 p.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] B had no hand towels or washcloths.On 2/23/26 at 5:43 p.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] A and B had no hand towels or washclothsOn 2/25/26 beginning at 2:27 p.m., the following observations were made:-room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths;-room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths;-room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths;-room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths;-room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths;-room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths;-room [ROOM NUMBER] had no hand towels or washcloths;-room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment were free of accidents and hazards for one (#11) of two residents reviewed for accidents out of 41 sample residents and three of three emergency crash carts. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #11 was assessed to determine if he was safe to smoke independently after an incident of unsafe smoking; and,-Ensure medical grade power strips were readily available in the crash carts (a specialized, mobile, and organized unit of trays and drawers on wheels containing essential life-saving equipment and medications). Findings include: I. Failed to ensure Resident #11 was assessed to determine if he was safe to smoke independently after an incident of unsafe smoking A. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Smoking policy and procedure, revised 6/12/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/26 at 4:53 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Smoking is not allowed inside the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured, and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards in two of two medication carts.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were labeled and dated appropriately with the resident's name and the date the medication was opened.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Labeling and Storage policy, dated February 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/26/26 at 9:23 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Labeling of medications and biologicals dispensed by the pharmacy is consistent with applicable federal and state requirements and currently accepted pharmaceutical practices. The medication label includes, at a minimum: medication name (generic and/or brand); prescribed dose; strength; expiration date, when applicable; resident's name; route of administration; and, appropriate instructions and precautions.II. ObservationsOn 2/26/26 at 8:48 a.m. the second floor medication cart was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable in taste. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was palatable in taste and temperature.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Food Preferences policy, dated July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/26 at 9:23 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The food services department will offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal, as well as access to nourishing snacks throughout the day and night. The facility's quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) committee will periodically review issues related to food preferences and meals to try to identify more widespread concerns about meal offerings, food preparation, etc. II. Resident group interview A group of five residents (#2, #7, #24, #56 and #58) who were assessed by the facility to be interviewable, were interviewed together on 2/25/26 at 10:30 a.m. Resident #7 said the vegetables were often overcooked and she did not believe the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure necessary maintenance repairs were communicated and completed in a timely manner in the kitchen area.Findings include:I. ObservationsDuring a walkthrough of the kitchen on 2/25/26 from 11:28 a.m. to 11:53 a.m., the following was observed: -The wall behind the toaster was observed with visible burned marks. The wallpaper was observed peeling in multiple areas. There were sections of wallpaper observed missing above the toaster near the ceiling. -There were six holes observed in the wall to the right of the spice rack on the same wall as the toaster.-There were multiple areas of chipped paint observed on the ceiling along two pipes adjacent to the wall where the toaster was located. -There were multiple chipped paint marks observed on the ceiling along one pipe which was adjacent to the pipe line next to the wall where the toaster was located. -There were approximately twenty to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#69) of two residents reviewed for personal property out of 41 sample residents was able to retain their personal belongings. Specifically, the facility failed to receive consent from Resident #69 or his responsible party before disposing of his personal belongings after the resident was discharged to the hospital.Findings include:I. Resident #69A. Resident statusResident #69, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included quadriplegia and systemic lupus. The [DATE] minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. B. Record reviewA nursing note, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #69's physician assessed him and found that the resident had phimosis (a condition where the foreskin could not be retracted) which required medical intervention. The physician ordered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to consider resident and family group views and act upon grievances and recommendations.Specifically, the facility failed to provide the residents the opportunity to share views, grievances, and recommendations to dietary related issues in the resident council meetings.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Grievance policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/26 at 4:53 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All grievances, complaints, or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups will be considered. Actions on such items will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response.II. Resident group interviewFive alert and oriented residents (#24, #2, #7, #56 and #58) who regularly attended the resident council meetings and were deemed interviewable by assessment and the facility were interviewed together on 2/25/26 at 10:30 a.m. The residents were identified as alert and oriented through facility and assessment.The group of residents said the facility did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing programs to support choices of activities and engaging programming based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan that were designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of two (#46 and #55) of three residents reviewed for activities out of 41 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide personalized meaningful activity programs for Resident #46 and Resident #55 as documented in their care plans.Findings include:I. Resident #46A. Resident statusResident #46, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included unspecified dementia, mood disturbance and anxiety. The resident was in hospice care.The 2/18/26 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of nine out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (#67) of two residents reviewed out of 41 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure physician's orders were obtained for Resident #67's insulin pump and that the insulin pump was being appropriately monitored; -Ensure Resident #67's blood glucose (sugar) levels were being monitored; and,-Ensure Resident #67 received a carbohydrate-controlled diet, per her request.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the American Diabetes Association's Check Your Blood Glucose - Diabetes Testing And Monitoring retrieved on 3/4/26 from https://diabetes.org/living-with-diabetes/treatment-care/checking-your-blood-sugar, The logging of your blood glucose results is vital. When you bring your log to your health care provider, you will have a good picture of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing of pressure injuries and prevent of additional pressure injuries for one (#46) of two residents out of 41 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #46, who had pressure injuries, was repositioned and provided incontinence care in a timely manner; and,-Ensure staff consistently implemented care planned pressure injury prevention interventions for Resident #46.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to Basic Nursing third edition; [NAME] S. Treas, [NAME], [NAME] H. [NAME] (2022), page 1214-1215, Healthy people regularly shift position to maintain comfort. However, many patients are unable to move without assistance. They require a change of position at least every two hours to prevent skin breakdown, muscle discomfort. People who are immobile are more prone to pressure injury as a result of reduced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-08-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MADISON CREEK PARTNERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO