Cedar Mountain Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 19.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.74 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their own policy regarding safety and supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a fall incident during a transfer to a shower chair on March 14, 2026. This failure may have potentially contributed to Resident 1 sustaining acute mildly displaced fracture of the proximal tibia and proximal fibular shaft (a recent break in the upper neck of the knee and the thin shin bone). Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (a condition of not being able to move one side of the body) hemiparesis (a condition of weakness on side of the body affecting arms and legs, aphasia (a condition of not able to speak) and age-related cataract (a condition of the eye). A review of Resident 4's History and Physical dated, February 20, 2026, indicated, . OTHER PLAN: . Patient [Resident 1] is not able to make own decisions.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services, which were consistent with the resident's needs and choices, for residents who are unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (those needed for self-care and mobility and include activities such as bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, ambulation, toileting, eating, transferring, and communicating) independently for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1, who was dependent for self-care and mobility, was repositioned by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) in bed by himself, dishonoring Resident 1's Wife's preference for Resident 1 for a two-person assist (safe patient handling technique in healthcare where two trained caregivers help someone move, transfer, or perform daily activities when they can't do it alone). This failure resulted in Resident 1 to fall out of bed, posing a potential risk to Resident 1's health and safety.Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment for one of four sampled residents (Resident 12) when the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool) assessment did not reflect the accurate status of Resident 12 who was receiving hospice (end of life care) services.This failure had the potential for unmet services necessary for Resident 12's hospice care.Findings:A review of Resident 12's admission Record, dated 9/26/25, indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive lung disease which blocks air flow making breathing difficult) and cirrhosis of the liver (scarring of the liver, caused by chronic injury or long-term liver disease) among others.A review of the facility document titled, Order Entry, a physician's order for Resident 12, dated 7/8/2025, indicated, May admit to (Name of company) Hospice under (name of physician) Dx (abbreviation for diagnosis):…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and person-centered care plans for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25) when:a. There was no care plan addressing anticoagulant (medication that helps prevent blood clots) use for Resident 25.b. The facility did not implement injury prevention interventions identified in Resident 25's fall risk care plan.These failures had the potential to result in complications from anticoagulant therapy and injury from falls for Resident 25.Findings:a. A review of Resident 25's admission Record, indicated Resident 25 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation (Afib - an irregular heartbeat that commonly causes poor blood flow).A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool), dated 8/15/25, indicated Resident 25's cognitive (ability to think and reason) skills for decision making were intact. The MDS indicated Resident 25 had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 17, Resident 22, and Resident 25) were free from accident hazards when:a. The wheelchair arm rests for Resident 22 were peeled off with abrasive fragments and exposed cushion.b. Floor mats were not provided as ordered for injury prevention interventions for Resident 17. c. Floor mats were not provided as ordered for injury prevention interventions for Resident 25.These failures had the potential to compromise the safety of Residents 22, 17, and 25 and result in skin breakdown, accidents, and injuries.Findings: a. A review of Resident 22's admission Record, indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a condition marked by impaired muscle coordination and/or other disabilities, typically caused by damage to the brain before or at birth), diabetes (a long term condition that causes high blood sugar levels), and paraplegia (loss of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services, including the timely provision and replacement of dentures, were provided to one of one sampled resident (Resident 84).This failure had the potential to result in impaired nutrition, oral pain and discomfort, difficulty eating, and decreased quality of life for Resident 84.Findings:A review of Resident 84's admission Record (a document containing a summary of basic information about the resident), indicated Resident 84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE].A review of Resident 84's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool), dated 9/10/25, indicated Resident 84's cognitive (ability to think and reason) skills for decision making were intact. The MDS indicated Resident 84 had no natural teeth.A review of Resident 84's Treatment Sheet, dated 6/19/25, indicated a Treatment Plan including a referral for new dentures.A review of Resident 84's Care Plan titled Dental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of spreadable diseases and infections when:1. One gray basin was found on the bathroom floor containing four food containers and two utensils.2. Respiratory Therapist 1 (RT 1) did not do hand hygiene after stepping out from Resident 58's room and after removing gloves.3. Three resident trash bins were full and overflowing.These deficient practices posed the risk for transmission of communicable diseases and infections to residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 9/22/25, at 9:15 AM, in the bathroom between the rooms of Resident 6 and Resident 20, a gray basin containing food containers and utensils was found on the floor. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1), on 9/22/25, at 12:55 PM, CNA 1 was asked about the contents of the gray bin and stated there were four food containers and two forks. CNA 1 stated this was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility staff failed to notify the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 2 had twenty-four episodes of high blood pressure (blood pressure higher than 160) and were not reported to the doctor. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 2 to suffer complications. 2. Resident 2 had eight episodes of high blood sugars and were not reported to the doctor. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 2 to suffer complications. Finding: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) dated, August 21, 2023, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar) and Hypertensive Heart Disease (A condition of the heart caused by high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated August 1, 2023, through August 30, 2023, it indicated, Hydralazine HCL (medication used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food safety practices to prevent foodborne illnesses as evidenced by food debris, black grime and dirt were observed under the kitchen stove and griddle. This failure had the potential to result in food contamination and foodborne illnesses to medically compromised population of 71 of 94 residents in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Kitchen [NAME] (KC 1) on March 13, 2023, at 8:35 AM, there were food debris, black grime and dirt seen under the kitchen stove and griddle. The KC 1 stated the floor should be kept clean and free from debris and dirt. During an interview with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) on March 14, 2023, at 3:15 PM, the DSS stated they had designated staff assigned each day for mopping and sweeping the kitchen floor. The DSS stated the kitchen floors should be kept clean, otherwise it could potentially attract insects and rodents which could contaminate food. During a concurrent interview and record review with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the status of a pressure injury (a wound developed on bony prominences as a result of prolonged pressure) in the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a computerized clinical assessment) for Resident 31. This failure had the potential to inaccurately reflect Resident 31's status to the oversight agency (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services - CMS), who provides funding for Resident 31. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's clinical record, the face sheet (contains admission and demographic information), indicated Resident 31 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure (long term dysfunction or complications of the lungs), intestinal obstruction (a condition in which digested material is prevented from passing normally through the bowel), and chronic kidney disease (long term dysfunction or complications of the kidneys). Upon further review of the clinical record for Resident 31, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MADISON CREEK PARTNERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA