Parkway Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation
7760 Parkway Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (619) 469-0124 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2021
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.15 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.8%CMS range 21.6–52.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 7.8–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 4.2–14.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were obtained and followed for a surgical foot wound on one of two residents reviewed for wound care (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in infection or other wound complications.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fracture of the lateral malleolus (the prominent bony bump on the outer side of the ankle), according to the undated admission Record.A record review was conducted.According to the physician's History and Physical note (H&P), dated 12/5/25, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility following a fall and ankle fracture with surgical repair.According to a Nurses Note, dated 12/4/25, Resident 1 had surgical wounds with staples on his right foot and ankle.The physician's orders for Resident 1 were reviewed. No treatment orders for the surgical wounds were identified for Resident 1's admission date of 12/3/25 through 12/26/25.According to the December…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after a hospitalization for one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 had a delayed stay in the hospital while waiting for alternate placement. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include paraplegia (inability to move the lower limbs), and was discharged to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 3/28/26. Per the GACH's Case Manager Interdisciplinary Note, dated 3/30/26 (two days after admitting to the GACH) at 11:39 A.M., Resident 1 was calm and cooperative, and was medically cleared to discharge back to his skilled nursing facility. Resident 1 stated that he wanted to return to the skilled nursing facility. Resident 1 had an active bedhold at the skilled nursing facility, but they were not accepting him back. Per the GACH's Nursing Note, dated 4/3/26 at 6:46 P.M., Resident 1 discharged to a different skilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-24 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the required education or experience to effectively manage the Food Service department. This failure had the potential to place 52 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Cross reference: F806, F812, F813Findings: An interview was conducted with the DM on 9/22/25 at 9:45 A.M. The DM stated she had been employed as the DM for approximately 18 months. The DM stated she did not have a degree in food service management, or a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) credential. The DM stated she did not have experience as a food service manager from any other facility. The DM stated she had been promoted into her current job by a previous manager. A record review of the DM's employee file was conducted on 9/22/25. An undated, unsigned job description, titled Certified Dietary Manager, was in the file. Per the job description, The primary purpose of this position is to plan, organize, develop and direct the operations of the food and nutrition services department in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy had:Oxygen saturation levels (the amount of oxygen in the blood) routinely monitored and documented (Resident 3), and,A physician's order for oxygen therapy was obtained prior to administration (Resident 7). These failures had the potential for Residents 3 and 7 to receive oxygen when it was not required, resulting in the possibility of dependency. Findings: 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-permanent damage to the lungs which affects airflow and gas exchange), per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 3 on 9/21/25 at 8:51 A.M. Resident 3 was sitting up in bed with a nasal cannula (a plastic tube that delivers oxygen to the nose) inserted in his nares. Resident 3 stated he had trouble breathing sometimes and normally gets 2 liters of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure alternate food items were of equal nutritive value. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for nutritional deficits. Findings:An observation of the kitchen tray line was conducted on 9/23/25 starting at 11:20 A.M. Trays were being prepared for 52 residents for lunch. The following items were served or prepared during the tray line: 1. [NAME] (CK 2) removed a plastic-covered chef salad from the refrigerator, and placed the salad on a resident tray. The chef salad contained a hard boiled egg, lettuce, cheese, turkey and ham. 2. CK 2 prepared a sandwich from two pieces of white bread and two slices of what appeared to be American cheese. CK 2 then grilled the sandwich in butter until browned, then placed the sandwich on a resident tray. 3. CK 2 prepared a quesadilla from a medium sized flour tortilla and a handful of shredded cheese. CK 2 browned the quesadilla in an oiled pan, then plated the quesadilla and placed it on a resident tray. No recipes or measuring utensils were visible or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen sanitation and proper food storage was implemented in a manner that lessened the risk for foodborne illness when: 1. Food preparation areas, food storage containers and a tabletop can opener were visibly dirty, 2. Food in the kitchen was not labeled with opened date, use by date, or dispose date,3. Foods in the storeroom were not labeled with opened date or use by date, and4. Overhead light fixtures in the kitchen were rusted and dirty. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness to a population of 52 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: A kitchen tour was conducted on 9/21/25 at 8:39 A.M. with [NAME] (CK) 1. 1. The tile ledge near the hand wash sink, as well as a chemical dispenser box were covered with a thick, dark greasy layer of what appeared to be dirt. A window ledge over a utility sink had a thick dark layer of the same substance. A table top can opener had food debris embedded into the grooves of the can opener, as well as the tabletop can opener…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines involved in providing care to the residents) assessed and documented self-administration of medications kept at bedside was clinically appropriate for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 29). This failure had the potential for Resident 29 to experience negative health outcomes, including increased risk of infections and not to receive the full therapeutic benefits of his medications.Findings:A review of Resident 29's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses such as burn of second degree [a burn that causes injury, blistering, pain and swelling to the outer and middle layers of the skin]. including the right eye.During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 29 on 9/23/25 at 9:29 A.M., Resident 29 stated he sometimes.[ran] out of Tegaderm [a transparent dressing used to cover and shield wounds], which he wore underneath his eyepatch. Resident 29 stated he also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident-centered care plan (detailed plan with information about a patient's treatment, goal, and interventions) was implemented for one of two sampled residents (Resident 8) reviewed for pain management. This failure had the potential to affect resident's care needs. Cross Reference F 697.Findings: Resident 8 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cancerous tumor of the right breast and chronic pain, per the facility's admission Record. On 9//21/25 at 8:22 A.M., an observation and an interview with Resident 8 was conducted in her room. Resident 8 laid in bed and was watching a television show. Resident 8 stated she had missed four doses of her pain medication because staff had informed her the facility ran out. Resident 8 stated she was upset because she was in pain. On 9/22/25, a record review was conducted. Resident 8's History and Physical (H & P), dated 7/17/25, indicated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pain medication was available for one of two residents reviewed for pain management (Resident 8). This failure had the potential to cause the resident unnecessary pain, negatively affecting the resident's quality of life. Cross Reference to F 656.Findings: Resident 8 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cancerous tumor of the right breast and chronic pain, per the facility's admission Record. On 9//21/25 at 8:22 A.M., an observation and an interview with Resident 8 was conducted in her room. Resident 8 laid in bed and was watching a television show. Resident 8 stated she had missed four doses of her pain medication because staff had informed her the facility ran out. Resident 8 stated she was upset because she was in pain. On 9/22/25, a record review was conducted. Resident 8's History and Physical (H & P), dated 7/17/25, indicated she had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services when:1. Random controlled medication (medications with a high abuse potential) use audit for five of six sampled residents (Residents 6, 19, 26, 27 and 52) indicated medications were signed out of the controlled drug record (CDR, count sheet used to track controlled medications), but were not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR - section of the medical record where all medications given to the resident are recorded to ensure patient safety) to indicate they were administered to the residents. This failure had the potential for diversion (unlawful distribution or use), mismanagement of controlled medications and inadequate narcotic accountability, healthcare professional clinical decision-making based on an incomplete medical record which could result in adverse resident outcomes, and the potential to not meet the needs of the residents in the facility. 2. Expired medications were not removed from stock in one of one Medication Rooms for two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 10.71% when three medication errors occurred out of 28 opportunities during the medication administration for one of seven randomly observed residents (Resident 26). This failure had the potential for Resident 26 not to get the full therapeutic benefit of his medications or to experience negative health outcomes. Findings:During a medication administration observation on 9/21/25 at 9:03 A.M., Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 was observed preparing and administering eleven medications for Resident 26. LN 1 stated Resident 26 received his medications crushed and mixed with applesauce. LN 1 crushed all of Resident 26's tablets individually and mixed each one with applesauce in separate medicine cups, including the following tablet: methadone (a strong painkiller) oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) - give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for pain management, dated 9/14/25.LN 1 opened all of Resident 26's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was stored under proper temperature controls in one of one Medication Rooms. This failure had the potential to negatively alter the drug's stability, physical properties (such as consistency) and effectiveness, which could result in adverse resident outcomes.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/21/25, 10:05 A.M., an inspection of the Medication Room was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 17. A tube of erythromycin (an antibiotic) ophthalmic (for the eye) ointment for Resident 29 was found in the medication refrigerator, which was 37 F (degrees Fahrenheit, a measurement of temperature). The drug manufacturer's labeling on the medication instructed, store between.59 F to 77 F . LN 17 confirmed the manufacturer's labeling and stated, it would have to be stored outside. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/22/25 at 1:44 P.M., the DON stated medications have to be stored how [the drug manufacturer] says. The DON stated it was important to follow the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food brought into the facility from outside sources was stored appropriately, and procedures were in place for safe reheating of foods.This failure had the potential to result in pest control concerns, as well as foodborne illnesses.Findings:An observation and interview was conducted on 9/21/25 at 9 A.M. with Resident 24. Resident 24 was sitting in a wheelchair next to her bed. The bedside table was covered with large bags of candy, cookies and other opened food items. A blanket was folded at the foot of the bed, and on top of the blanket was a bunch of ripe bananas and a small brown bag from a fast food restaurant. None of the foods were in plastic bags, and none had labels attached with dates or the resident name and room number. Resident 24 stated the food from the kitchen was sometimes cold, so she had friends and family bring her food from outside to keep in her room. Resident 24 stated the facility had not offered her bins or containers to store her food items. An observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented records when the wrong blood pressure (BP) reading was recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR, an official legal document that has a complete and accurate record of all medications administered to a resident to ensure patient safety) of one out of five sampled residents (Resident 9). This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation in Resident 9's medical records.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Nurse (LN) 16 on 9/24/25 at 10:53 A.M., a review of Resident 9's clinical records was conducted. Resident 9's clinical records indicated she had active orders for medications, including the following: losartan (a medication for high blood pressure) 25 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement for dose) - give one tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN (hypertension, high blood pressure). Hold if SBP (systolic blood pressure, the top number in a blood pressure reading) less than 110, started 10/1/24, and metoprolol (a medication for high blood pressure)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control practices in one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 26). This occurred when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 and CNA 2 did not wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE, clothing or equipment, such as gowns, gloves and masks, designed to prevent the spread of infections) while caring for Resident 26, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, infection control practices designed to prevent the spread of multidrug resistant organisms [MDROs, germs that cannot be killed or inactivated by medications] in nursing homes). This failure had the potential to put residents, staff, and visitors at risk for infections due to cross-contamination.Findings:During a medication administration observation on 9/21/25 at 9:28 A.M., immediately outside Resident 26's room, Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 stated Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were changing Resident 26. LN 1 stated she would give Resident 26 medications after the CNAs were done providing him with care. A sign was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment for residents residing in the facility when: 1. Hallway floors were taped and with missing floorings, 2. A handrail was observed loose and wobbly. This failure had the potential for residents to trip, fall and sustain injury. Findings: 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 8/20/24 at 8:26 A.M., the hallway floors were observed to have gray duct tape (tape used for general sealing, patching holes, and repairs) to secure the flooring. Multiple duct tapes extended from the flooring in the front nursing station to both hallways of the facility. One hallway had missing flooring in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] which created an uneven surface. a. Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness according to the facility's admission Record. On 8/21/24 at 9:52 A.M. Resident 30 was observed walking into room [ROOM NUMBER] using a cane. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 hours a day for 18 days from January 1, 2024 through March 31 of 2024. This failure had the potential for residents and staff to receive inadequate supervision and for residents to not receive an appropriate quality of care. Findings: Review of PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705 (a report that can helped Skilled Nursing Facilities identify areas for improvement in care and operations) for January 1st through March 31, 2024 indicated ,No RN (Registered Nurse) hours was triggered for 19 days. On 8/23/24 at 9:15 A.M., a concurrent interview with the Staffing Coordinator (SC) and record review of staffing log for January 1st through March 31, 2024 was conducted. SC stated her records indicated the following days did not have an RN scheduled for at 8 least hours: January 1, 6, 7, 8, 20, 28 February 2, 3, 9 10, 11, 24, 25 March 2, 3, 9,10,17 SC stated that staffing numbers for Licensed Nurses (LN) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were within limit those days, but they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prevent medication errors of less than 5% for three of eight sampled residents (Resident 37, Resident 31, and Resident 33) during medication pass observation with three licensed nurses (LN 1, LN 2 and LN 3) when: 1. LN 1 administered medications to Resident 37's gastronomy tube (G-tube: a surgical opening on the abdomen for nutritional and/or medication administration) omitting one medication to be administered and the full dose of medications administered (eight medication errors) . 2. LN 2 did not administer Resident 31's morning medications (9:00 A.M.) as scheduled for more than three hours (nine medication errors). 3. LN 3 did not administer Resident 33's Januvia (oral medication that lowers blood sugar) as scheduled due to medication not available in medication cart (one medication error). As a result, there were 18 medication errors and 36 total opportunities during a medication pass observation. The facility's medication error…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of eight sampled residents (Resident 37, Resident 31, and Resident 33) were free from significant medication errors when: 1. LN 1 administered medications to Resident 37's gastronomy tube (G-tube: a surgical opening on the abdomen for nutritional and/or medication administration) omitting one medication to be administered and the full dose of medications administered. 2. LN 2 did not administer Resident 31's morning medications (9:00 A.M.) as scheduled for more than 3 hours. 3. LN 3 did not administer Resident 33's Januvia (oral medication that lowers blood sugar) as scheduled due to medication not available in medication cart. As a result, Resident 37, Resident 31 and Resident 33 had the potential for serious health complications to cause discomfort and/or jeopardizes his or her health and safety. Cross Reference 759 Findings: 1. A review of Resident 37's admission record indicated Resident 37 was re-admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff (dishwashers) had the competency to use, operate, document and check the water temperatures of two low temperature dishwashers. This failure increased the risk of food borne illness being transmitted via dirty dishware. On 8/21/24 at 8 A.M., a concurrent observation of low temperature dishwasher, interview with Dishwasher (DW) 11, and record review of Dish Machine Temperature Log was conducted. DW 11 stated that the process for washing the dishes was to spray the dishes in sink to rinse off food, place the dishes in the rack in the machine, turn on the machine to do it's rinse, then do a check for chlorine after the rinse cycle. DW 11 was observed taking chlorine sample at water exit site from the machine, not directly on dishes that had just been rinsed. DW 11 was unsure where to take temperature reading for the log. DW 11 pointed to the chlorine test strip when asked about the temperature. Review of Dish Machine Temperature Log with DW 11 indicated the temperature was logged at 120…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served to all residents was in a palatable, flavorful manner that maintained the nutritional value of the menu items served. This failure had the potential to decrease residents' meal intake and contribute to weight loss. The facility census was 55. Findings: During a dining observation and interviews with residents on 8/20/24 from 9:00 A.M. to 12:45 P.M., residents' food concerns included: .Cooks can't cook grilled cheese sandwich . .Macaroni and cheese were dry . Sometimes food can be cold . .Meat is bland, noodles come with no sauce, too many carrots . .I always get broccoli. I won't eat that . . Food is cold, had no taste . .Food had no taste; meat was hard to cut . .Food was gritty, not good . .I'm a Vegetarian and they keep giving me fish . .I get food for lunch that is salty, and I'm a on renal diet .it's unhealthy . .I always get chicken or ham sandwich for my lunch sack, but would prefer peanut butter and jelly sandwich . .Food was overcooked, oversalted, water-down soups, and not enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: 1. Soy sauce and teriyaki glaze were stored per manufacturer's recommendation, 2. The low temperature dishwasher reached appropriate rinsing temperature for sanitization of dishware. These failures increased the chances of residents getting foodborne illness. Findings: 1. On 8/20/24 at 8:14 A.M., an observation of the kitchen storeroom and interview with Dietary Manager (DM) was conducted during the initial tour. Opened containers of soy sauce and teriyaki glaze were observed on a shelf in dry storeroom. Soy sauce was dated 8/6/24 and teriyaki glaze was dated 8/4/24. Review of manufacturer's recommendations on container labels indicated REFRIGERATE AFTER OPENING. DM stated that she was unaware that soy sauce and other soy based sauces needed to be refrigerated. DM disposed of sauces in the garbage. On 8/23/24 at 7:50 A.M., an interview with DM was conducted. DM stated that expectation was that her staff would read the food labels and follow the directions for storage on labels. DM stated the importance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS: a nursing assessment tool) for one of five residents (Resident 31) reviewed for vaccination status. As a result, the facility sent Resident 31's MDS to the federal database with inaccurate vaccination status. Cross Reference F883 Findings: 1. A review of Resident 31's admission Record indicated Resident 31 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of congestive heart failure (is a long-term condition that occurs when the heart is not able pump enough blood to meet the body's needs. This can happen when the heart is too weak or stiff to pump properly, or if it can't fill up with enough blood. As a result, blood backs up in the heart, or becomes congested). A record review of Resident 31's MDS dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven-day period) score of 15 points…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update a resident centered care plan for one resident (Resident 6) with a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP - a machine that delivers mild air pressure through the nose to keep breathing airways open while asleep) machine reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 6 to not receive a resident centered and appropriate care and treatment. Findings: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA- a problem in which breathing pauses during sleep due to blocked airways) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 8/21/24 at 8:56 A.M. Resident 6 was in bed with a red hat covering her eyes. Resident 6 did not respond when greeted. A CPAP machine was observed on top of a plastic container with 2 drawers on the right side of the bed. The mask for the CPAP machine was on top of Resident 6's bed. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 9 residents (Resident 43 and Resident 30) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL-basic tasks of everyday life) received assistance with nail care. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents' dignity, cause infection from the debris under the fingernails and cause injury from having long, jagged fingernails. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 43's admission record indicated Resident 43 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which include Hemiplegia (Loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness). Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-A standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the health status of residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes) Section C-Cognitive Patterns dated June 20,2024 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs-a test that assesses a patient's orientation, learning, and memory) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for the settings of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP-a machine that delivers mild air pressure through the nose to keep breathing airways open while asleep) was ordered for one (Resident 6) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 6 to receive inappropriate care and treatment which could lead to a decline in Resident 6's respiratory status. Findings: Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA- a problem in which breathing pauses during sleep due to blocked airways) according to the facility's admission Record. During an observation on 8/21/24 at 8:56 A.M. Resident 6 was in bed with a red hat covering her eyes. Resident 6 did not respond when greeted. A CPAP machine was observed on top of a plastic container with 2 drawers on the right side of the bed. The mask for the CPAP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident medications (Resident 1) were secured and locked during a medication storage inspection. This failure had the potential for medication misuse, divergence (another person taking medications or medications used wrongfully), and unauthorized person to have access to the medications. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of epilepsy (also known as seizures - uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, loss of consciousness). A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a nursing assessment tool that is used to develop a plan of care) dated 7/3/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven day period) score of 11 out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive (pertaining to memory, judgement and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control procedures for three (Resident 27, Resident 34 and Resident 6) of 17 residents reviewed for infection control when: 1. Oxygen tubing was not changed weekly for two residents (Resident 27 & 34) per policy and procedure . 2. CPAP mask for Resident 6 was not stored properly. These deficient practices had the potential for residents to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for residents and staff. Findings: 1. a. Review of Resident 27's admission Record indicated that Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses which included Chronic Respiratory Failure (a long-term condition that makes it difficult to breathe and exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that damage the airways and other parts of the lungs, making it difficult to breathe), and Congestive Heart Failure (a long-term condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or administer an updated pneumococcal vaccine for two of five residents (Resident 31 and Resident 37) reviewed for immunization. These failures increased the risk to compromise the health and well-being of Resident 31 and Resident 37 with respiratory infections and other complications associated with pneumonia (a respiratory infection caused by bacteria, virus or fungi that causes the lungs to be inflamed making it hard for oxygen to circulate in the blood stream that can cause discomfort and difficult to breath). Cross Reference F641 Findings: 1. A review of Resident 31's admission Record indicated Resident 31 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of congestive heart failure ( a long-term condition that occurs when the heart is not able pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). A record review of Resident 31's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a nursing assessment tool that is used to develop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to equip resident rooms with curtains to ensure complete visual privacy for one of two sampled residents (1). As a result, there was the risk of facility residents observing Resident 1 while she received personal care. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, functional quadriplegia (inability to move the arms or legs). On 7/25/24 at 10:31 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 1. There was a privacy curtain for Resident 1's bed that other residents would have had to enter in order to access the room's shared bathroom. The privacy curtain for Resident 1's bed, did not separate the walkway to the bathroom door from Resident 1's bed. Resident 1 stated, she did not have any privacy at the facility. Resident 1 further stated, if her roommate needed to use the bathroom while Resident 1 was receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure neuro checks (used to assess an individual's neurological functions and level of consciousness) was completed after a resident ' s (Resident 1) fall for one of three sampled residents. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1's health at risk. Findings: On 1/2/24, an unannounced onsite at the facility was conducted related to a complaint on quality of care. During a review of the facility's admission Record, dated 6/23/21, the admission Record, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses which included dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movement). During a review of Resident 1 ' s minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 6/30/21, indicated Resident 1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS, ability to recall) score was 14, which meant Resident 1's cognition was intact. During a review of Resident 1 ' s acute care hospital (ACH) record dated 8/19/21 at 6:59 A.M., the Emergency Department Physician documented Resident 1 had bruises on her head and scrapes to right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a breathing treatment as ordered for two of two sampled residents (1, 2). As a result, the residents had a risk of decreased lung function. Findings: 1 Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Chronic Respiratory Failure (difficulty breathing). Per the facility's Pulmonary Orders treatment log, dated 12/22/23, there was an order for staff to complete the incentive spirometer (a device to improve the ability to breathe) with Resident 1 four times per day. From 12/1 through 12/22/23 there were 85 opportunities to sign that the task was completed, and nine of the opportunities were left unsigned. 2 Per the facility's admission record, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure. Per the facility's Pulmonary Orders treatment log, dated 12/22/23, there was an order for staff to complete the incentive spirometer (a device to improve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a registered nurse (RN) on duty for eight hours per day on 21 of 31 sampled days. As a result, there was a risk of decreased quality of care and facility and resident oversight. Findings: On 12/22/23 at 11:23 A.M., an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 stated, their facility had an RN work on some days, but not every day. On 1/2/24 at 11:30 A.M., a telephone interview and record review was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) of the License Nurses Monthly Schedule for December 2023. The DSD stated, they had three RNs who worked at the facility, who were scheduled to work on a total of 10 of 31 days in the month of December. On 1/5/24 at 10 A.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the Administrator. The administrator stated, they should have had an RN scheduled for at least eight hours per day, but they were not able to schedule one every day in December.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and home-like environment when; A. Ten of 54 resident rooms (Rooms 5, 6A, 6B, 16, 17, 18, 20, 27, 28A, and 28B) had power strips that were not UL (Underwriters Laboratories, nationally recognized standards for safety) certified and had multiple electrical cords plugged into power strips that were not fastened to the wall or floor, B. Six of 24 resident rooms had a broken window ( Rooms 14, 16, 21, 24, 25, and 26). C. Six of 24 rooms had temperature levels that were not within a comfortable range (Rooms 12, 14, 16, 25, 26, and 27). D. One resident (36) had a space heater that was not UL certified, and E. The facility did not have a permanent generator. These failures to ensure a safe, comfortable and homelike environment may result in power outage, fire or hypothermia (A potentially dangerous drop in body temperature). Findings: A. On 12/15/21 at 8:30 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the MD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and consistently maintain a QAPI plan when: A. Current Infection control practice standards were not followed during medication administration and staff screening for COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory disease that could affect the entire body); B. Resident room windows were broken and not repaired, non certified for safe use power extension cords were used, and facility generator did not function during power outage; C. Facility staffing coverage not monitored and; D. Two emergency medication kits were not properly secured and accounted for. This failure had the potential to affect the safety, quality of life and care of all the residents in the facility. See F880, F584, F725, and F761. Findings: On 12/21/21 at 7:45 A.M., an interview was conducted with the SSD. The SSD stated she was not aware of any QAPI projects in the facility. The SSD stated, I was handed a paper yesterday indicating I was the project lead for anti-psychotic medication. On 12/21/21 at 8:19 A.M., an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain proper infection control practices based on current standards when: A. Two staff members (CNA 11, CNA12) did not screen for COVID-19 prior to clocking in for work; B. Staff did not properly sanitize medical equipment and did not perform hand hygiene between residents during medication administration (LN 19, LN 41, LN 44). These failures to ensure proper infection control practices based on current standards had the potential to spread infection in the facility. Findings: A. Upon entering the front entrance of the facility on 12/14/2021 at 8:47 A.M., instructions were given by facility staff to check temperature and answer screening questions on an electronic tablet. On 12/15/2021 at 7:20 A.M., two staff members were observed entering a side gate of the facility from the parking lot, instead of the front entrance. On 12/16/2021 at 8:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with the ICP. The ICP stated all staff members are required to screen for COVID-19 at the front entrance of the facility prior to clocking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six medication consents that required a physician's signature were signed for one of five sampled residents (16). As a result Resident 16 received medication without proper education. Findings: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia (memory loss) and psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) per facility's admission Record. Resident 16's clinical record titled, informed consents for Anxiolytic (medication to reduce anxiety); Hypnotic (medication for sleep); Antipsychotics (medication to treat mental disorder); Antidepressant (medication to treat mood disorder), all dated 9/14/21, was conducted. All the consents for Resident 16 did not have a physician's signature. On 12/17/21 at 4:23 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 16's informed consent with LN 20 was conducted. LN 20 acknowledged Resident 16's medication consents, dated 9/14/21, did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clarify a Physician's Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for one of two sampled residents (19). This failure had the potential for residents to receive inaccurate life sustaining measures during an emergency. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (progressive disease that causes kidney damage) and malignant neoplasm of colon (progressively worsening cancer) per the facility's admission Record. A record review of Resident 19's history and physical notes was conducted. Per the physician's history and physical notes dated 9/28/21, Resident 19 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 19's clinical record had two POLST forms, both dated 9/28/21. One form was signed by Resident 19, and the other form was signed by a person with an unreadable relationship to the resident. On 12/14/21 at 3:02 P.M. a joint interview and record review with LN 41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and clarify with the physician the use of physical restraint (any device that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of a person's bodily movement) for one of one sampled resident (23). As a result, Resident 23 complained of hand and shoulder pain. Findings: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, cognitive (thinking) communication deficit, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one side of the body paralyzed) per the facility's admission Record. During the initial tour of the facility on 12/14/21, Resident 23 was heard screaming, Help, help, somebody please. Resident 23 was observed laying on her bed with her right arm raised. Resident 23's right hand was observed to have a white colored mitten. Resident 23 stated she had the mitten for, Five months, I'm not sure why they put it on me. Resident 23 stated she could only move her right arm and staff fed her for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reevaluate the use of a hand mitten physical restraint (any device that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of a person's bodily movement) for one of one sampled resident (23). Failure to reassess the need of a physical restraint have the potential for residents to be placed for injury and affect their quality of life. Findings: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, cognitive (thinking) communication deficit, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one side of the body paralyzed) per the facility's admission Record. Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. Per the Nurse Practitioner's order dated 3/20/2020 at 17:48 (5:48 P.M.), Mittens/socks on both hands . Per the facility's care plan dated 3/20/2020, [Resident 23] have behavioral problem and the care plan had no time frame for the hand mitten use under the section, Interventions. Resident 23's Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident centered care plan for antipsychotic medications (medication to treat mental illness) for two of five sampled residents (2, 32). This failure had the potential for the staff not to recognize behavioral changes and possible side/adverse effects in Resident 2 and 32. Findings: A. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations) and psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) per facility's admission Record. Per Resident 2's Order Summary Report, dated 12/21/21, QUEtiapine Fumarate, an antipsychotic medication, was ordered on 3/15/21. Resident 2 did not have a care plan for this antipsychotic medication. B. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) per facility's admission Record. Per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and closed record reviews, the facility failed to develop a discharge plan for one of two sampled residents (49). Resident 49 left the facility against medical advice (AMA- leaving the facility without a doctor's approval) thirteen days after his admission date. This failure had the potential for Resident 49 to not receive appropriate coordination of care upon discharge. Findings: Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hypertensive urgency (high blood pressure with minimal to no symptoms and no signs or symptoms of organ damage) per the admission Record. A record review of Resident 49's clinical record was conducted. Resident 49's Nursing Note, dated 10/21/2021, indicated Resident 49 approached facility staff and, .will be leaving today to be picked up by his friend. Resident 49's progress notes did not show any documentation related to discharge planning. Resident 49 did not have a care plan focused on discharge planning. Resident 49's Physician Discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate a scheduled hospice visit and plan of care for one of two hospice residents reviewed for hospice care (39). This failure had the potential for miscommunication among health care givers. Findings: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm (progressively worsening cancer) of right lung, neoplasm of bone and spinal cord. Resident 39's clinical record was reviewed. The following information was obtained from the facility's hospice binder: A. November 2021 [Hospice] Personalized Visit Schedule calendar with signatures on 11/4, 11/5, and 11/12/21. B. An [unknown month] Personalized Visit Schedule Calendar with one signature on unknown month/13/unknown year. C. Two Interdisciplinary Plan of Care Revision/Physician Orders dated 11/12/21 and 12/2/21. On 12/20/21 at 9:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with the SC. The SC stated hospice visited the residents three times a week.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was enough staff coverage to meet the residents' needs. This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care and life of all the residents in the facility. Findings: During the survey entrance on 12/14/21 at 8:47 A.M., the ADM and the DON was not present in the facility. Subsequently, the ADM was not in the facility on 12/15, 12/16, and 12/17/21. On 12/20/21 at 7:11 A.M., an interview and record review with LN 44 was conducted of the facility's staffing schedule. The night shift schedule for CNAs dated 12/19/21 indicated there were three CNAs scheduled to work. LN 44 stated there was one CNA left in the building from night shift and the two CNAs, Just left. On 12/20/21 at 7:14 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 42. CNA 42 stated his shift started at 11 at night and ended at 7:30 in the morning. CNA 42 stated that staff should finish their full eight hour shift to make sure residents' needs were met. On 12/20/21 at 7:29 A.M., an interview was conducted with the SC. The SC stated staff who worked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a medication that required titration(gradually lowering a drug's dosage over a prolonged period) as ordered by a physician for one of three sampled residents (2). As a result Resident 2 did not receive the full benefits of the drug treatment. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including ulcerative colitis (inflammation in the digestive tract) per facility's admission Record. On 12/20/21 at 9:46 A.M., a medication administration observation was conducted with LN 19. LN 19 stated Resident 2 had a scheduled dose of prednisone (a medication to reduce inflammation). LN 19 was observed searching for Resident 2's prednisone in the medication cart. LN 19 stated she needed to contact the pharmacy because Resident 2's prednisone was out of stock. Per Resident 2's Order Summary Report, dated 12/20/21, .prednisone 20 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for COLITIS . Per Resident 2's MAR, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two emergency kits (Ekits) were locked, secured, and accounted for. Failure to secure Ekits had the potential for drug diversion and inappropriate medication use. Findings: On 12/16/21 at 11:07 A.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with the ICP in the facility's medication storage. Inside the medication room were a total of six Ekits, one of which was not sealed, and the other was partially sealed with a string tie. In addition, there was a medium-sized container that contained multiple bubble packs that had medications with resident names. Inside the medication refrigerator were two opened vials of medication labeled Daptomycin (an antibiotic) that both contained approximately 1/3 of yellow-tan colored fluid inside. Per the ICP, when a medication was taken out of the Ekit, the seal should be replaced and the medications should be reordered from the pharmacy. The ICP further stated she was not sure why the Ekits were not sealed properly, and what medications were taken out. On 12/16/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when: A. multiple food items were in the refrigerator or freezer with no dates and not properly sealed; B. staff's personal items were stored in the kitchen next to the refrigerator; C. a window sill in the food storage room was not clean; and D. two dented cans. These failures to ensure effective food and nutrition service operations may result in placing residents at risk for food borne illness and the growth of harmful organisms. Findings: A. On 12/14/2021 at 9:20 A.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with the Cook. There were three trays holding plastic cups filled with white, red, and amber colored fluid with no labels with date and description. Upon observation of the freezer, was a blue plastic bag with frozen carrots with no label. In the same freezer, was an open box with an open plastic bag of beef patties. The [NAME] stated the bag of carrots and beef patties should have been put…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate physician's progress notes for one of one sampled resident (23). This failure had the potential for Resident 23 to receive inaccurate treatments and wrong medical information. Findings: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, cognitive (thinking) communication deficit, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one side of the body paralyzed) per the facility's admission Record. Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 23's three pages of physician's progress notes dated April 2021 indicated a different resident's name on the first two pages. The progress notes contained resident's history of present illness, review of systems, exam, and data review. In addition, the physician progress notes contained assessment, plans, and goals. On 12/20/21 at 10:34 A.M., a joint interview was conducted with the ICP and the RMRC. The ICP stated the physician's progress notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and review of the Client Accommodations Analysis (document with measurements of the square footage of the useable living space of individual resident rooms and approved capacities), the facility failed to provide the minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in 4 of 28 resident rooms.This failure had the potential for residents in rooms 2, 4, 6, and 21 to feel cramped and uncomfortable. Findings:The facility's Analysis of Accommodations was reviewed.Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] each accommodated two resident occupancy providing 143 total square feet of space per room. Each room provided 71.5 sq. ft. per resident.Interviews were conducted with the residents of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] on 9/23/25 at 11:06 A.M. All residents stated their rooms were comfortable and they had no concerns. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] accommodated three residents, providing a total of 221 sq. ft. of room, with 73.66 sq. ft. of room space per resident.Interviews were conducted with the residents of Rooms 6 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and review of the Client Accommodations Analysis (document with measurements of the square footage of the useable living space of individual resident rooms and approved capacities), the facility failed to provide the minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in 4 of 28 resident rooms. Findings: The facility's Analysis of Accommodations was reviewed. Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] each accommodated two resident occupancy providing 143 total square feet of space per room. Each room provided 71.5 of sq. ft. per resident. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] accommodated three residents, providing a total of 221 sq. ft. of room space with 73.66 sq. ft. of room space per resident. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] accommodated four resident occupancy providing a total 304 sq. ft. per room with 76 sq. ft. per resident. The variations in room size requirements are not observed to adversely affect the resident's health, safety, quality of care or quality of life during the survey. The Department recommends…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and review of the Client Accommodations Analysis (document with measurements of the square footage of the useable living space of individual resident rooms and approved capacities), the facility failed to provide the minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in 4 of 28 resident rooms. Findings: The facility's Analysis of Accommodations was reviewed. Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] each accommodated two resident occupancy providing 143 total square feet of space per room. Each room provided 71.5 of sq. ft. per resident. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] accommodated three residents, providing a total of 221 sq. ft. of room space with 73.66 sq. ft. of room space per resident. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] accommodated four resident occupancy providing a total 304 sq. ft. per room with 76 sq. ft. per resident. The variations in room size requirements are not observed to adversely affect the resident's health, safety, quality of care or quality of life during the survey. The Department recommends…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MADISON CREEK PARTNERS — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHRISTENSEN, COVEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2014 |
| CLEGG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/26/2023 |
| MADISON CREEK PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2014 |
| ALAMAR, ALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| HOPKINS, AMBER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2021 |
| MURRAY, BRITTANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/03/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055078. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.