No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Golden Harbor Healthcare Center

442 Sunset Boulevard, Hayward, CA 94541 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (510) 582-8311 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Aug 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$27,322 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $27,322 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
770 A St Ste 107 · (510) 727-9233 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
22138 Mission Blvd · (510) 581-8540 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
448 Grove Way · (510) 861-9625 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
22100 Princeton St · (510) 459-2599

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.2%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.4%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.7%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.1%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.512.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.591.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified69.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.97
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.453 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, for two of three (Resident 53 and 43) sampled residents who were reviewed for close supervision, the facility failed to ensure Resident 52 and 43 were supervised when, 1. Resident 52 who was high risk for elopement left the facility unattended on 5/14/2024 between 10:15 a.m. and 11:14 a.m., and 2. Resident 43 who had a history of frequent seizures and falls was not monitored for 50 minutes. These failures resulted in Resident 52 eloping from the facility unattended on a sidewalk in a street intersection and had the potential for Resident 43 to sustain an injury if experienced an unwitnessed seizure. The Administrator (ADM) was notified by the survey team of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ, a situation in which a provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation have caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment or death to a patient/resident) on 5/14/24 at 4:39 p.m. The facility failed to ensure Resident 52 who was a high risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week. This failure presents a threat to residents reaching their highest practicable level of well-being and had the potential to endanger the health and safety of residents. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/27/25 at 11:06 a.m. with the Staffing Coordinator (SC), the facility's licensed staffing schedules for the month of January 2024 through March 2024 were reviewed, the staffing schedule indicated there were no Registered Nurses (RN) scheduled to work eight hours a day during the following dates:1. For the month of January 2024: 1/10/24; 1/11/24; 1/16/24 and 1/25/24.2. For the month of February 2024: 2/8/24; 2/9/24 and 2/13/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/27/25 at 11:06 a.m., with the SC, the facility's licensed staffing schedules for the month of April 2024 through June 2024 indicated there was no RN scheduled to work eight hours a day during the following date:1. For the month of April 2024: 4/29/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. Controlled substance medications (medication with a high potential for abuse and addiction) were accurately accounted for on the medication administration record (MAR) and the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an accountability record) for three of four randomly selected residents (Residents 11, 20, and 101);2. The intravenous (IV, administered into the vein) supplies, narcotic, and intramuscular (IM, injected into the muscle) emergency kits (e-kit; a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) were replaced according to facility policy and procedure (P&P) after use; 3. Routine medication for one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 16) was available for administration. 4. The method of disposition and destruction of unwanted and unused medication prevented diversion and/or accidental exposure.These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications, potential for abuse or misuse of medications, the potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored on top of medication carts (med carts) when left unattended, med carts were locked when left unattended, medications with shortened expirations after use were labeled with an opened date, and med carts were kept clean and orderly. The deficient practices had the potential for unauthorized staff/residents to access medications, for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency, for residents to suffer hazardous cross-contamination to their medications, and for medications to not be safely administered to residents.During a medication pass observation on 8/25/25 at 12:19 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), LVN 1 was observed preparing medications for a Resident 40. LVN 1 removed insulin lispro (a rapid acting insulin) from the med cart, drew up the dose, left the vial on top of the cart and walked into the resident's room to administer the medication without locking the cart. The medication cart was angled out towards the hallway and accessible to staff and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were maintained for six of 51 sample residents (8,25,65,105,93, and 83). This failure had the potential to result in six sampled residents developing and transmitting infections when:1a. Central Supply 1 did not sanitize hands when entering and existing Contact Precaution rooms [ROOM NUMBERS].1b. Central Supply 1 refilled 1/2 empty glove boxes from Contact Precautions rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] using bare hands1c. Registered Nursing Supervisor 1 did not disinfect / sanitize reusable medical equipment (scissors).1d. Certified Nursing Assistant did not know effective properties and dwell time of Sani Wipes for shared COVID reusable medical equipment .1e. Laundry Assistant 1 did not clean the dryer lint trap at the scheduled time and appropriately initial the dryer lint log.2a.BP cuff not sanitized/ disinfected after use.2b. Insulin aspart hub was not sanitized/ disinfected before pen needle was attached.2c.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advanced directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding the medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor), were discussed with the residents and/or responsible parties for 14 of 51 sampled residents (Residents 1,2,4,6,7,8,10,11,12,28,33,53,57 and 77).This had potential for the facility to provide treatment and services against the residents' wishes. 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 8/29/25, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive (a sickness characterized by weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 6/10/25 indicated Resident 1's short and long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect and keep secure when not in use, confidential resident health data and records for a census of 94. This failure had the potential to expose and disclose personal and confidential health information to unauthorized individuals.During a medication pass observation on 8/25/25 at 12:19 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), LVN 1's computer screen was observed unlocked and accessible to residents and staff passing by when he left to administer medications to Resident 40. During an interview on 8/25/25 at 3 p.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 confirmed he had left the computer unlocked and unattended when he went to administer medication to Resident 40. During an interview on 8/26/25 at approximately 4:30 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated nursing staff were to sign out from the computer system or lock the computer every time they walked away from it so resident information would not be exposed. During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Electronic Medical Records, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure maintenance services were provided to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for seven of 51 sampled residents when:For Resident 33, Resident 14, Resident 74, and Resident 81, wall clocks were not provided in their rooms. This failure resulted in emotional distress for not having a wall clock and not knowing what time it was for the residents who occupied those rooms. 2. For Residents 36, 46, and 90, their rooms had peeling paint, missing baseboards, and exposed patchwork. These failures had the potential to decrease residents' quality of life. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 33's admission Record, printed on 8/27/25, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included disorientation and needs assistance with personal care. A review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care), dated 6/6/25, indicated Resident 33 was able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure patient safety for medication use for three of 51 sample residents (Residents 11, 20 and 104) when:1. Multiple incomplete and unclear PRN (as needed) pain medication orders were not clarified for indication for use (e.g. mild, moderate, or severe pain) prior to administration.2. Insulin was not administered in accordance with manufacturer specifications and standards of practice.These failures had the potential to result in inappropriate medication administration, preventable medication errors, increased risk of adverse drug events, oversedation, and resident harm or death.1a. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/27/25 at 9:02 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 20's physician's orders were reviewed. Resident 20's medical record indicated the following physician's orders for pain management:Tramadol (a potent pain medication to treat pain) 50 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement): Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain, ordered 8/10/25.Tylenol (a milder pain medication)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 51 sampled residents (Residents 10, 11, 20, and 101) were free from unnecessary medication when narcotic pain medication was administered not in accordance with physician's orders. This failure had the potential to unnecessarily expose residents to adverse consequences of medications and inadequate indication of use of medications.1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/27/25 at 9:02 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 20's physician's orders and Medication Administration Records (MARs) were reviewed. Resident 20's medical record indicated a physician's order for tramadol (a narcotic pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain, ordered 8/10/25. A review of Resident 20's MAR dated August 2025 indicated nursing staff administered pain medication to Resident 20 on 8/16/25 and 8/17/25 when the documented pain score (a patient's self-reported or observed rating of pain intensity, using a standardized scale like 0-10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 11.63% error rate when five medication errors out of 43 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for four of eight Residents (Residents 16, 49, 73 and 104). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions.During a medication pass observation on 8/25/25 at 10:40 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), LVN 1 was observed preparing medications for Resident 16 which included amantadine (medication to treat Parkinson's disease, a disorder of the nervous system that causes difficulties with movement, muscle control, and balance), docusate sodium (medication to soften the stool), furosemide (medication to rid the body of excess water), losartan (medication to lower blood pressure), metoprolol tartarate (medication to lower blood pressure), vitamin D, and lidocaine (medication to treat pain) 4% patches.A review of Resident 16's medical record indicated a physician's order for lactulose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and ensure safety of self-administered medication for one resident (Resident 40) out of a census of 94, when Resident 40 self-administered insulin lispro (a fast-acting insulin to treat diabetes) without a physician's order, evaluation by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of professionals, including the resident, their family, physicians, nurses, social workers, and therapists, who collaborate to develop, implement, and monitor the resident's individualized care plan) and applicable care planning. This failure increased the potential for Resident 40 to not receive the full therapeutic effect of the medication, and risk of injury and infection from the incorrect administration of medication.During a medication pass observation on 8/25/25 at 12:08 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), LVN 1 was observed preparing insulin lispro for Resident 40. LVN 1 stated Resident 40 usually self-administered his insulin. LVN 1 drew seven units from the insulin lispro vial with a syringe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 51 sampled residents (Residents 10 and 13) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when1. Resident 10 received Cymbalta (a psychotropic medication to treat depression) without implementation of non-pharmacological (non-drug) interventions in an effort to lower the dose or discontinue the medication.2. Resident 13 did not have the appropriate indications for the use of Seroquel (Seroquel is an antipsychotic medication; antipsychotic medications are medications that are used to treat symptoms of psychotic mental disorder such as delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, or confused thoughts).These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medication.1.A review of Resident 10's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility in May 2025 with diagnoses including depression, diabetes and high blood pressure. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one sample resident's (Resident 50) / out of 51 residents, English / Chinese picture board for communication was utilized to effectively communicate with others. This lack of effective communication resulted in Resident 50 feeling unable to communicate with staff and experiencing frustration. During an interview on 8/26/25 at 10:30 a.m. at the facility Resident Council meeting, Resident 50 stated she had a difficult time communicating with and understanding the staff. Resident 50 was noted to be articulate a with hearing deficit.During a record review of Resident 50's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated. Resident 50 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with a diagnosis of metabolic and toxic encephalopathy (condition where the brain doesn't work properly because there's too much or too little of something in the blood (like sugar, oxygen, or toxins). It can happen due to things like liver or kidney failure, infections, or exposure to harmful substances.), delirium (sudden and serious change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14), the facility failed to provide treatment and care consistent with professional standards of practice when a resident was provided a wheelchair (w/c) that was inappropriate for resident's size. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 14's safety and support while up in the w/c. A record review of Resident 14's admission Record' (AR), printed on 8/27/25, AR indicated resident 14 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with multiple diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), dementia (memory loss), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care), dated 7/28/25, indicated Resident 14 was able to understand others and be understood. The MDS indicated that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score or 13-15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 57) when:1. Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) failed to assess Resident 57 immediately after CNA 1 reported resident's unwitnessed fall incident. 2. CNA 1 assisted Resident 57 back to the chair without the appropriate Licensed Nurse knowledge and assessment, following the resident's unwitnessed fall to the floor in the resident's room.These failures resulted in delay in receiving the appropriate medical interventions necessary to meet the resident's nursing care needs and potentially placing Resident 57 at risk for further harm or injury post fall. A record review of Resident 57's admission Record printed on 8/27/25, the AR indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility in July 2025, with diagnoses that included alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced disorder (refers to a presentation of alcohol dependence in which a person is not currently experiencing acute complications such as intoxication, withdrawal, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 51 sampled residents call light (Resident 89) was answered promptly. This failure had the potential for Resident 89's needs not to be met in a timely manner and had the potential to result in skin injuries. During an initial tour of the facility on 8/25/25 at 10:23 a.m. in Resident 89's room, the resident stated she had to wait for a long time before her call light was answered, and also, stated she had to wait a long time for her incontinent briefs to be changed. Call light response time was tested, and Resident 89 pressed her call light at 10:25 a.m. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was observed to answer the resident's call light at 10:48 a.m. The ADON stated it was not acceptable for the resident to wait for 23 minutes (the amount of time that had passed from 10:25 a.m. until 10:48 a.m.) to have her needs attended by the staff. Also stated the call light should be answered promptly due to risk of unattended needs. The ADON had also shown the call light monitor in the nurses' station…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 did not receive a medication called albuterol sulfate (used to prevent and treat wheezing, a high-pitched sound that occurs during breathing when the airways in the lungs become narrowed or blocked, and shortness of breath caused by breathing problems) inhalation according to physician's order. 2. Resident 1's oxygen saturation (amount of oxygen you have circulating in the blood) level was not monitored from 1/27/25 to 1/29/25 appropriately when Resident 1 had complaints of shortness of breath and wheezing. This failure had the potential to worsen Resident 1's respiratory condition. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record , printed on 2/25/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with multiple diagnoses including osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone) of left ankle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services and procedures that assure accurate dispensing and administration when Resident 1's Inhaler medication [Albuterol Sulphate ( Medication that helps with breathing by relaxing the muscles of the airways)] was not available on hand per physician's order. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1's worsened respiratory condition including respiratory arrest (occurs when breathing stops). Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record , printed on 2/25/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with multiple diagnoses including osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone) of left ankle and foot, type II diabetes mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), and lobar pneumonia (a type of lung infection that affects one or more lobes of the lungs). During a record review of Resident 1's Order Summary , dated 3/6/25, the Order Summary indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and address a potential accident hazard when Activity Assistant (AA) 1 did not take the appropriate action to prevent accidents after Resident 1 inquired about purchasing a firearm and if the AA knew where or from whom a gun could be obtained. This failure placed the facility ' s 63 residents at risk for harm and injury when a gun and ammunition were found in Resident 1's room. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, printed 11/11/24, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including a primary diagnosis of paraplegia, complete (the loss of muscle function in the lower part of the body including both legs). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident ' s cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week, when an RN was not on duty for eight of 12 days sampled. This failure has the potential to endanger the health and safety of residents while presenting a threat to residents from reaching their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 5/17/2024, at 11:20 a.m., with Payroll (PAYROLL), payroll data was reviewed from Q1/2023 (January - March) until Q1/2024 (January - March). A random sample of dates were chosen for review for each quarter. Payroll confirmed there was no RN scheduled for the following dates: 1. For the month of July 2023: 7/10/23, 7/12/23, 7/13/23 2. For the month of August 2023: 8/24/23, 8/25/23, 8/28/23 3. For the month of October 2023: 10/27/23, 10/30/23 During an interview on 5/17/24, at 11:59 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated there has be an RN in the facility eight hours a day.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the risk of elopement (leaving a facility without staff knowledge) for two (Resident 52 and Resident 4) out of three sampled residents, when 1. Resident 52's Wanderguard (a type of alarm to help protect those at risk for elopement) interventions were not implemented and Resident 52 eloped from the facility. 2. Resident 4's Wanderguard interventions were not implemented. These failures resulted in Resident 52 eloping from the facility for almost one hour without staff knowledge (Cross reference F689) and had the potential for Resident 4 to elope from the facility which could result in injury and/or death. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 52's admission Record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (liver damage caused by alcohol) and encounter for palliative care (care focused on pain and symptom relief of an illness rather than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system of records for controlled drugs (medications regulated by the government due to high risk for potential abuse and dependence) for disposition were followed and maintained when three Controlled Drug Logbook (CDL) pages of the Narcotics Destruction Log (NDL) were not consistently completed with date of Director of Nursing Services (DNS) receipt of controlled medications, no co-signatures by the licensed nurse and DNS upon exchange of controlled medications, and no page number. The failure to complete three CDL pages listing a total of 43 medications had the potential to prevent accurate accounting of controlled medications and prompt identification of loss, extent of loss, or potential diversion of controlled medications. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/16/24 at 8:44 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), at the DON's office, the Narcotics Destruction Log (NDL) binder was reviewed. The pages in the NDL were titled Controlled Drug Logbook (CDL). The three CDL pages contained a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 18 sampled residents (Residents 33, 23, and 28) residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (medications that are capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) when: 1. Resident 33's PRN (pro re nata [a Latin phrase], meaning as needed, or as necessary) order for Olanzapine (an anti-psychotic medication used to treat mental disorders) had no end date. 2. Resident 23 had no rationale for continued use of PRN Ativan beyond 14 days (Ativan is a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety). 3. Resident 28 had no rationale for continued use of PRN Ativan beyond 14 days. These failures had the potential to not promote or maintain Resident 33's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 33's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/16/24, indicated past medical history of Diabetes Type II and Dementia (impaired memory and thinking abilities). The H&P also included an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated and stored under proper temperature controls in the medication refrigerator for one of two medication rooms (a locked room used to store medications and supplies) when: 1. Medication refrigerator temperatures were not monitored daily for nine days out of 31 days in May 2024. 2. Two multiple dose vials of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD, a test used to detect tuberculosis (an illness that affects the lungs), were not labeled with the date the vials were opened. These failures had the potential to result in resident use of ineffective medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/13/24 at 2:09 PM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the Temperature Log, for the medication refrigerator was reviewed. The Temperature Log indicated, Medication Fridge Temperature Acceptable Range: 36°F - 46°F. The IP stated there were no refrigerator temperature records documented on the following days in May 2024: May 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, the facility failed to update and revise four of 16 sampled resident (residents 10, 23, 29 and 34) care plans. These failures had the potential for Residents 10, 23, 29 and 34 to receive inappropriate interventions to manage care. Findings: During a record review of Resident 34's admission Record dated 3/22/22, the admission Record indicated Resident 34 was admitted on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), the Functional Status dated 2/25/22 indicated Resident 34 needed extensive assistance and total dependence with bed mobility, transfer, locomotion on and off the unit, toilet use and personal hygiene and bathing. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/23/22, at 1:14 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), of Resident 34's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Self Care Performance Deficit Care Plan, revised 11/21/21, indicated the care plan was not updated since 11/21/21. DON stated the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure five (Residents 19, 23, 24, 36, and 39) sampled residents were provided a shower as scheduled for dependent residents. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, body odor and psychosocial discomfort. Findings: During the resident's council meeting on 3/22/22 at 10:32 a.m., four residents in attendance stated they received showers once a week, and when the facility was short of staff they did not get showered. Review of Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care), dated 7/16/21, indicated: Resident 19 required one-person, physical assist with transfer between surfaces, including to and from bed, chair, wheelchair and standing. Resident 19 required physical help with bathing activity. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 23 required one person, physical assist with transfer between surfaces, including to and from bed, chair, wheelchair and standing. Resident 23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-24 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure three sampled residents (Resident 19, 24 and 36) received behavioral health care and services when Resident 19, 24 and 36 had not received a psychiatrist (physician specializing in mental health) evaluation as planned and ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to cause residents continued emotional distress. Findings: During a residents council meeting on 3/22/22 at 10:35 a.m., Resident 36 stated living in the facility was hard, especially during COVID-19 (a virus causing respiratory illness and outbreak that is easily spread) outbreaks when residents were in their rooms all the time. Resident 36 stated most of the residents at the facility have behavioral issues. Resident 36 stated the facility did not provide much needed counseling for residents. Review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment and care screening tool used to guide care), dated 1/16/22 indicated, Resident 19 had diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure to conduct infection control surveillance when they did not track, analyze, and create infection control data. This deficient practice had the potential for infections to go undetected or controlled which could spread within the facility. Findings: During an interview and concurrent record review with the Infection Preventionist (IP), on 3/24/22 at 10:30 a.m., IP stated and showed the infection control surveillance was last documented in August 2021. IP stated she could not provide documentation of conducting infection control surveillance from September 2021 to currently. IP stated she was new to the facility and was trying to contact the previous IP about the infection control surveillance records, but was unsuccessful. During an interview with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), on 3/24/22 at 12:15 p.m., RN 1 stated the infection control surveillance should be done monthly to make sure there were no outbreaks. During an interview with RN 1 on 3/24/22 at 12:23 p.m., RN 1 stated she could not find…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure to implement antibiotic stewardship when they did not monitor appropriate use of antibiotics and improved outcomes for residents. This deficient practice had the potential to spread infection in the facility. Findings: During an interview and concurrent record review with the Administrator (Admin), on 3/24/22 at 10:43 a.m., Admin stated she could not find documentation that their antibiotic stewardship was done in September, October and November of 2021. During an interview with the Registered Nurse 1 (RN) 1 on 3/24/22 at 12:15 p.m., RN 1 stated the antibiotic stewardship monitoring should be done monthly to make sure there were no outbreaks and to make sure the use of antibiotics were needed. During an interview with Admin on 3/24/22 at 12:16 p.m., Admin stated antibiotic stewardship monitoring should be done to make sure antibiotics were not used unnecessarily. During an interview with RN 1 on 3/24/22 at 12:23 p.m., RN 1 stated she could not find the antibiotic stewardship binders that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to make reasonable effort to safeguard the resident's property for one (Resident 36) sampled resident when Resident 36 complained of missing socks which was not investigated. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 36 distress. Findings: During a resident's council meeting on 3/22/22 at 10:35 a.m., one resident stated the facility did not follow up with their report of missing clothing items. Resident 36 stated she reported to the Social Services Director (SSD) that her socks were missing. Resident 36 stated SSD did not follow up with her complaint or replace her clothing item. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care) dated 12/29/21, indicated Resident 36's Basic Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, meaning the resident had good long and short term memory. Resident 36 was able to express her ideas and wants and had clear speech. During an interview on 3/24/22 at 10:49 a.m., SSD stated she was aware of Resident 36's missing socks and could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one of three residents (Resident 49) reviewed for closed records, the facility failed to notify Resident 49's representative of the decision to transfer Resident 49 to the hospital. This failure had the potential to result in the representative being unaware of changes in Resident 49's health status and whereabouts. Findings: Review of admission Record indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space that surrounds the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and acute respiratory failure (when fluids build up in the air sacs in the lungs). Resident 49's admission Record indicated Resident Representative (RR) 1 was Resident 49's emergency contact. Review of the Progress Notes titled, SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) Change of Condition dated 12/22/21, indicated Resident 49 had severe cramping to the right side groin area with protrusion of the area and very tender to touch. Resident 49 was transferred to the acute hospital via 9-1-1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and closed record review, for two of three sampled residents, (Residents 47 and 49), the facility failed to: 1. Notify in writing, Resident 47 and Resident's Representative 2 (RR 2) of the reason for the discharge in Resident 47's clinical record. 2. Notify in writing, Resident 49 and RR 1 of the hospital transfer. These failures had the potential to result in lack of information to prepare the residents and their resident representatives following the discharge or hospital transfer. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 47's admission Record indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's dementia (memory loss and impaired decision-making ability), and pneumonia (infection of the lungs caused by bacteria, virus or fungi). Review of Resident 47's Progress Notes Dated 12/21/21 indicated Resident 47 was picked up by ambulance and discharged to a board and care. During an interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) on 3/23/22 at 3:09 p.m., SSD stated Resident 47 and RR 2 were not notified in writing about the reason for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and closed record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 49), the facility did not provide Resident 49 and Resident Representative 1 (RR 1) written information about the facility's bed hold policy before and upon transfer to the hospital. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 49 being unaware of the right to return to the facility during a therapeutic leave according to the bed-hold policy. Findings: Review of the admission Record indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space that surrounds the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and acute respiratory failure (when fluids build up in the air sacs in the lungs). Resident 49's admission Record indicated RR 1 was Resident 49's emergency contact. Review of the Progress Notes Situation, Background, Assessment, Review (SBAR), a communication process among healthcare professionals) Change of Condition dated 12/22/21, indicated Resident 49 had severe cramping to the right side groin area with protrusion of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-Resident Assessment and Care Screening tool used to guide care), was accurate for one ( Resident 24) sampled resident when Resident 24's preadmission screening for serious mental illness was not coded accurately. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to not received appropriate mental health care and services. Findings: Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set, MDS - resident assessment tool used to guide care, dated 7/28/21, indicated section A- Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was coded zero which indicated Resident 24 was not currently considered by the state level 11 PASRR process to have a serious mental illness. Resident 24's diagnoses included schizophrenia, (a long term mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior leading to faulty perception, withdrawal from reality into fantasy and delusion and a sense of mental fragmentation). Review of the State of California-Department of Health Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 27) reviewed for PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (a screening tool to determine if individuals with serious mental illness or intellectual/developmental disability or related condition require nursing facility services or specialized services), the facility failed to follow-up on PASRR level II screening as determined by Resident 27's PASRR Level I screening. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 27 not being provided specialized care and services to address a mental illness. Findings: Review of Resident 27's admission Record indicated Resident 27 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows), depression (persistently depressed mood and loss of interest in activities) and anxiety disorder (feelings of worry, anxiety or fear strong enough to interfere with daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 14), the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident 14's weight gain. This failure resulted in further weight gain that was not addressed appropriately. Findings: Review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (blood sugar disorder), hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone, and major symptoms include fatigue, constipation, dry skin and unexplained weight gain), and heart failure. Review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 1/8/22, the Swallowing/Nutritional Status, indicated Resident 14 had a weight gain of five percent (5%) or more in the last month or 10 % or more in the last six months. The MDS also indicated Resident 14 was not on a physician-prescribed weight gain regimen. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one (Resident 30) of one sampled resident reviewed for skin issues, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care were provided in accordance with the resident's choice when skin care was not provided to address Resident 30's dry skin. This failure had the potential to result in skin breakdown. Findings: Review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease that obstructs airflow from the lungs) and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 2/6/22, indicated Resident 30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment of resident's orientation to time and capacity to remember) score of 15, meaning no cognitive impairment. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 30, on 3/21/22 at 111:20 a.m., Resident 30's feet had very dry, flaky skin. Resident 30 stated having asked the staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets for providing care to residents when staff training for behavioral services were not provided. This failure had the potential to result in inappropriate care that did not meet the needs of the residents with behavioral issues. Findings: Review of the facility's Facility Assessment, last reviewed 11/25/21, indicated the services provided by the facility included mental health and behavior services, specifically behavior management. Furthermore, the facility would ensure staff competencies to include caring for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders, residents with history of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder, and non-pharmacological interventions to address behaviors. During an interview and concurrent review of the staff training records with the Infection Preventionist (IP), on 3/24/22 at 11:52 a.m., IP stated she began working at the facility on 3/21/22 and has yet to audit staff competencies. IP stated she could not find the record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents 27 and 36) sampled residents were free from unnecessary drugs when: 1. Resident 36 was administered trazodone (anti-depressant and sedative medication) for insomnia (inability to fall asleep or stay asleep) without adequate monitoring for hours of sleep. 2. Resident 27 behavioral symptoms were not monitored for the use of lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication). This deficient practice had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary drugs or the appropriate medication dosage to manage their condition which could have adverse side effects. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment and care screening tool used to guide care), dated 12/29/21 indicated, Resident 36 had trouble falling or staying asleep, or sleeping too much. Resident 36 diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) and depression (sadness or loss of interest). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired medication for one of 16 residents (Resident 31). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 31 being given expired medication and did not ensure safe medication administration. Findings: During a record review of Resident 31's admission Record dated 3/24/22, the admission Record indicated Resident 31 was admitted on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 31's Order Summary Report dated, 3/24/22, which indicated Resident 31 had a discontinued doctor's order for Heparin (blood thinner) Sodium (Porcine) Solution 5000 unit/milliliter ordered on 10/19/21. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 3/23/22, at 10:45 a.m., in the Medication Room, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 31's Heparin was observed to have an expiration date of 2/22. IP stated Resident 31's Heparin expired February 2022, and was not supposed to keep expired medications in the medication room. IP further stated the expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 14), the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory tests. This failure resulted in not monitoring and reporting potential abnormal test results. Findings: Review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (blood sugar disorder), hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone, and major symptoms include fatigue, constipation, dry skin and unexplained weight gain), and heart failure. Review of the History and Physical by Resident 14's physician dated 3/17/22, indicated under assessment/plan, Resident 14 needed labs (laboratory tests) that included TSH ( thyroid test), Free T4 (another thyroid test), HgbA1C (test for diabetic sugar control over a few months), CMP, CBC (Complete Blood Count), a test to check several components of the blood, like red blood cells), lipid panel (cholesterol, a waxy substance in the blood) and triglycerides (type of fat). Review of Resident 14's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff skills competency evaluations were completed for one [NAME] (CK 1). CK 1's competency evaluation was not completed before food preparation of the residents' meals. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food preparation under unsanitary conditions or foodborne illness. Findings: During an observation of the tray line, on 3/22/22 at 11:49 a.m., in the presence of the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and Dietician (RD), [NAME] 1 used the same paper towel to clean the thermometer while checking the prepared food temperatures. During an interview on 3/22/22 at 11:49 a.m., [NAME] 1 stated she was sorry and forgot to use alcohol wipes to clean the thermometer. Note: Checking the temperature without cleaning the thermometer probe between readings can lead to microbes being transferred from contaminated items to those that are thought to be safe or cross contamination). During an interview on 3/22/22 at 8:34 a.m., DS stated he did not document the skills competency evaluations for the dietary staff. DS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 42) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure Resident 27's clinical record was complete when the POLST (Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form was not completed and signed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 42 receiving care against her wishes. Findings: Review of Resident 42's admission record indicated Resident 42 had been known to the facility since August 2021. Resident 42 was admitted with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of central nervous system (condition when abnormal cells form in the brain or spinal cord) and acute ischemic heart disease (blockage of blood flow to the heart). Resident 42 had contracted COVID-19 (viral respiratory infection that could cause severe complication including death) after being admitted to the facility. Review of the Physician Orders dated 3/15/22 indicated an order for the POLST (Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment, a standardized medical order that indicates specific type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's quality assessment and assurance committee did not meet quarterly as required. This failure had the potential to result in not identifying quality of care issues and follow up on set goals. Findings During an interview and concurrent review of the facility's records with the Administrator (Admin), on 3/24/22 at 12:42 p.m., Admin stated the facility's last quality assurance (QA) meeting was in November 2021. Admin stated, the QA meetings were to be done every quarter, and the next one would have been done in February 2022. Admin further stated there was no record of the QA meeting having occurred in February 2022.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$27,322 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $22,777 — penalty dated 2024-05-17
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/16/2025
MCCORMACK, RYANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER20%since 01/16/2025
O'SHEA, BRADYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 01/16/2025
MCCORMACK, SHANEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/16/2025
BRANDI, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/16/2025
OSCHEROWITZ, AVISHAIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/16/2025
BARTON, LINDA BLUEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
DUATIN, DIKKO FREDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
GUPTA, SANJAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
MACASPAC, VICTORIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
MARIANO, SABINIANOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
MITCHELL, HUNTERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
PASCUA, CAMI ANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
PATEL, MANDAKINIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
SIGUA, JOELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
VENTOCILLA, LINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
VISMONTE, NOLLIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-32.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$156K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 2%Other / private 77%

This home reported $156K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$461per resident / day
operating cost
$14,014per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056471. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next