Morgan Hill Healthcare Center
530 West Dunne Avenue, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 52 certified beds · (408) 779-3633 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,261 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.50 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.50 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 89.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.6%CMS range 50.7–71.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.0–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 89.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 84.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.2–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 50.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-12-05 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their discharge policy for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not allowed to return to the facility after a doctor's appointment. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 1's health and safety.Review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission Record, dated 12/5/2025, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic progressive disease-causing inflammation in the joints and resulting in painful deformity and immobility), cerebrovascular disease (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), other amnesia (loss of memories, including facts, information, and experiences), and alcohol dependence, uncomplicated (a chronic disease in which a person craves drinks that contain alcohol and is unable to control his or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and timely treatment and care was provided to one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was only seen by a hand surgeon 33 days from the date of the Physician's order for the referral for possible osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone caused by infection). This failure resulted in Resident 1's left middle finger amputation (surgical removal of a body part) and hospitalization that put Resident 1 at risk for sepsis (a life-threatening complication of an infection). Findings: The clinical records of Resident 1 were reviewed. Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Other Paralytic Syndrome following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, bilateral (a condition that occurs when a stroke causes loss of muscle movement, or paralysis); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group of lung diseases that block…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, provision of care and services related to pressure ulcers were consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 22), when there were no proper description and measurements of the pressure ulcer of Resident 22 in her weekly wound assessments. These failures had the potential for the residents with pressure ulcers, not being properly monitored and treated which could delay the healing or worsen the wound. Findings: During the observation of Resident 22 on 4/7/25 at 12:46 p.m., Resident 22 was in her bed, eating lunch. She needed total assistance with feeding. Resident was calm, comfortable and able to answer questions. Review of Resident 22's admission record (document created when a resident is admitted to a healthcare facility, containing the vital information about the resident), indicated, Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled substance (drugs with high potential for abuse or addiction) medications were fully accounted for on the medication administration record (MAR) to indicate they were given for three out of six residents (Residents 13, 39, and 49) showed that medications were signed out of the Antibiotic or Control Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications). This failure had the potential for access to medications and supplies by unauthorized persons such as residents and visitors. Findings: 1. The CDRs for six (6) random residents receiving PRN (meaning as needed) controlled medications were requested for review during the survey. a. A review of Resident 13's MAR indicated to give Butalb-APAP-CAFF (Butalbital -Acetaminophen -Caffeine (used to treat tension headaches) 50-325-40 MG (milligram, unit of dose of measurement) 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for severe migraines 7-10 with start date of 9/18/24. During a concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 9.68%, when three medication errors out of 31 opportunities occurred during medication administrations for two of four residents (Residents 7 and 13) as follow: 1. Resident 7 missed to receive Gabapentin (medication used for nerve pain) and Docusate Sodium (DSS-stool softener used to treat and prevent constipation) during medication pass observation; and 2.Resident 13 was given Xarelto (Rivaroxaban - used to treat or prevents blood clots) 20 milligram (mg, metric unit of measurement) medication without meal. These deficient practices resulted in medications not being given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and/or manufacturer's specifications, which could have resulted in the residents not receiving the full therapeutic effects of the medications. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 4/8/25, at 8:36 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A, LVN A administered ten oral medications to Resident 7. A review of Resident 7's medication administration record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medication for one of one medication storage room and one of two medication carts, when: 1. Three blister pack of Buspirone HCL (used to treat anxiety disorder) 5 milligram (mg-unit of dose measurement) has expired on 2/2/25; 2. Two vials of tuberculin purified protein (Aplisol- a sterile aqueous solution of purified protein fraction for intradermal administration used in the diagnoses of tuberculosis) with no open date written on the vial; 3. A bottle of Latanoprost 0.005% (used to treat glaucoma [a condition in which increased pressure in the eye can lead to gradual loss of vision]) eye drop with expiration date of 4/7/25; 4. A bottle of Ciprofloxacin 0.3 % (used to treat infections of the eye) eye drop with no open date written on the bottle; 5. One vial of unopened Humulin R (a short acting, human-made injection that helps manage blood sugar levels in people with diabetes) was not refrigerated; 6. Oral medication and eye drop bottles were stored in one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, kitchen equipment were sanitary and dishwashing chemicals and garbage containers were stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. There were kitchen large pan trays and kitchen equipments that were unsanitary; and 2. Dishwashing chemicals and garbage containers in the kitchen were not stored safely and properly. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of micro-organisms which could cause foodborne illness (illness resulting from contaminated food) or cross-contamination (transfer of harmful substances or disease-causing microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, or utensils which are not cleaned properly) and food contamination (unintended presence of potentially harmful substances) for the fifty-one residents who received foods from the facility kitchen. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour observation with cook F (COOK F), on 4/7/25 at 9:05 a.m., there were brownish to blackish discoloration and rusty spots in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food recipes for making puree (smooth, crushed or blended food that's made by breaking down solid foods into a creamy paste or liquid) were being followed when the cook did not follow the recipes for making pureed baked beans and deluxe coleslaw. These failures had the potential to lead in decreased food palatability that could decrease the food consumed by residents which could lower the nutrient intakes for the eight residents on puree diet order out of fifty-one facility residents. Findings: 1. During the puree making observation with cook F (COOK F) on 4/9/25 at 11:15 a.m., COOK F was making puree baked beans. COOK F put 36 ounces (oz, a unit of measurement for weight) of baked beans, good for the 8 residents on puree diet, plus 1 extra serving, into the robot coupe machine (used for making puree foods), then pureed the baked beans. She added 2 teaspoons of thickener and set it aside after in the container with desired temperature. Review of the facility's undated recipe titled, Baked Beans:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures when one out of 14 sampled Residents (Resident 6's) nasal cannula was not replaced in a timely manner. Findings: During an observation on 4/7/25 at 9:18 a.m., Resident 6's nasal cannula (NC, flexible tubing inserted into the nostrils and attached to an oxygen [a colorless and odorless gas that people need to breathe] tubing was dated 3/25/25. Review of Resident 6's Order Summary Report dated 5/10/24, indicated, Change and date nasal cannula tubing every Thursday if actively in use one time a day every Tue. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 1:15 p.m., with the License Vocational Nurse (LVN) A, LVN A confirmed the nasal cannula was dated 3/25/25. LVN A further stated NC should had been changed every week to prevent infection, it's a weekly change of NC. Review of the facility's policy and procedure(P&P) titled Oxygen Administration, dated 5/1/23, the P&P indicated, Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care provided were in accordance with professional standards of practice when vital signs monitoring was not done for one (Resident 1) out of two sampled residents. This failure resulted in unrecognized decline of Resident 1's physical and mental status that led to hospitalization. Findings: The clinical records of Patient 1 was reviewed. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time) without Dyskinesia (involuntary movements), Spinal Stenosis, cervical region (spinal canal in the neck narrows, compressing the spinal cord and nerves), psychotic disorder (mental disorder characterized by disconnection from reality) with hallucinations (a perception of having seen, heard, touched, tasted or smelled someting that wasn't actally there). A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes dated 10/16/24 at 07:50 a.m. by Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. There were opened and undated food items in the reach-in refrigerator; 2. There was a dented can on the food preparation table; 3. The kitchen staff were not following their policy for checking dishwasher temperature and sanitizing frequency. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and food-borne illness to 45 of 45 residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen tour on 12/4/23 at 8:15 a.m., accompanied by the dietary aide B (DA B), in the reach-in refrigerator there was an opened undated 46 fluid ounce container of prune juice and an opened undated 32 fluid ounce container of soy milk. DA B confirmed the 2 items were opened and not dated, and stated all items should be dated when opened. DA B stated the prune juice and the soy milk must be discarded. Review of the facility's undated policy and procedure manual titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for five of 14 sampled residents (Residents 6, 47, 40, 44 and 41) when: 1. Resident 6's privacy curtain was not properly hooked to the rod; 2. Resident 47's privacy curtain had a dark red stain; 3. Resident 40's privacy curtain had a white stain; 4. Resident 44's room was cold; 5. Resident 41's room was cold; and 6. Facility hallways, lobby, and dining room temperatures were not maintained within the range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (a scale for measuring temperature). These failures had the potential to result for residents decreased sense of well-being, and exposed to an uncomfortable environment. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/4/2023 at 10:15 a.m., Resident 6's privacy curtain was not properly hooked at the ceiling rod. Four holes in the privacy curtain were not in a hook and was just hanging. During another observation on 12/5/2023 at 9:32 a.m., Resident 6's privacy curtain was not properly hooked to the ceiling rod. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate safety monitoring for four of 14 sampled residents (Resident 16, 31, 37, and 38) when the wanderguard device was not checked for proper functioning. This failure had the potential for the alarm system to not work and increase the risk for elopement (leave a facility without staff knowledge). Findings: During an observation on 12/4/23 at 10:07 a.m., Resident 31 was dressed in street clothes and lying on top of his bed sleeping. There was a Wanderguard (a device that activates an alarm when a resident attempts to leave a safe area) on his right wrist. Review of Resident 31's physician order dated 1/2/22 indicated: Wanderguard on at all times, check placement to right wrist every shift. Review of Resident 31's quarterly Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 11/30/23, indicated a score of 8 (A score of 6 or more indicates that the resident should be considered High Risk for elopement.) During an observation on 12/4/23 at 10:40 a.m., Resident 38 was sitting on the edge of his bed dressed in street…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of six residents (Resident 101) on respiratory treatment when: 1. The licensed nurse failed to ensure oxygen was administered as specified in the physician's order; 2. The facility staff failed to monitor Resident 101's shortness of breath as specified in the physician's order for more than two months. These failures had the potential to compromise Resident 101's health and safety. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 101's clinical record indicated he had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inability to keep oxygen and carbon dioxide at normal levels), congestive heart failure (heart works less efficiently and can lead to buildup of fluid in the lungs and shortness of breath), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (type of high blood pressure that affects the blood vessels of the heart). During an observation on 12/4/23 at 10:08 a.m., Resident 101 was lying in bed receiving oxygen at 4 liters…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily staffing information posted was the current date. This failure had the potential to result in nurse staffing misinformation to the residents, family and visitors. Findings: During an initial facility rounds on 12/4/2023 at 10:30 a.m., the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - contains daily staffing information) form was posted in front of the nurse station, dated 11/30/23. During another facility rounds on 12/5/2023 at 10:00 a.m., the DHPPD form was still posted with the same date, 11/30/23 ( 5 days past). During a concurrent observation and interview with director of nursing (DON) on 12/7/2023 at 1:14 p.m., DON reviewed the DHPPD posting. The DON confirmed the date in the DHPPD form was 12/6/2023. DON stated the posting was always the day before the current date. DON was informed of the date observed on 12/4 and 12/5/2023. The DON stated nobody updated the staffing information on a weekend. During a concurrent observation and interview with the administrator in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. Certified nursing assistant D (CNA D) did not perform hand hygiene when assisting two residents (Residents 16 and 24) with meals; 2. Licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) did not perform hand hygiene in between glove changes during Resident 47's wound treatment; 3. Certified nursing assistant G (CNA G) practiced double gloving (wearing of inner and outer gloves) during Resident 47's incontinent care; and 4. Resident 10's urinary drainage bag was found lying on the floor. These failures had the potential to compromise resident's health and safety in the facility. Findings: 1. During dining observation on 12/4/2023 at 12:39 p.m., inside the dining room, Resident 24 was eating lunch using her fork. CNA D held Resident 24's fork and knife to help slice the meat on her plate. After assisting Resident 24, CNA continued feeding Resident 16 using his spoon. CNA D did not perform hand hygiene after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat two of 14 sampled residents (Resident 16 and 10) with respect and dignity when: 1. Certified nurse assistant D (CNA D) was standing while feeding Resident 16 in the social dining area; and 2. Resident 10's urinary drainage bag was not covered with a privacy bag. These failures had the potential to negatively affect resident's emotional and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 16's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body/a severe or complete loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a relatively mild loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (also called stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, dysarthria (difficulty speaking) following cerebral infarction and vascular dementia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's care needs were accommodated for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident 47 and 40) when Resident 47 and Resident 40's call light buttons were not within reach to use. These failures had the potential to affect residents' physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1) Review of Resident 47's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including paraplegia (a paralysis that occurs in the lower half of the body. It can be a result of an accident or a chronic condition), osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) and pressure ulcer (PU-damage to the skin caused by prolonged pressure) of sacral region (part of the body located in between the bilateral buttocks), stage 4 (PU stage with full-thickness skin loss and possible involvement of the muscle, bone, tendon or joint). During an observation and concurrent interview on 12/4/2023 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 47 was lying in bed with head of bed (HOB) elevated. Resident 47's call light button…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's rights to confidentiality of protected health information (PHI, any information in the medical record that can be used to identify an individual and that was created, used, or disclosed in the course of providing a health care service such as diagnosis or treatment) when licensed nurse left the computer screen open and unattended on top of the medication cart. This failure had the potential to compromise the resident's privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During an observation on 12/5/23 at 10:05 a.m., a computer with a resident's medical record information was left opened and unattended on a medication cart in the hallway with two residents nearby potentially seeing the information. During an observation and concurrent interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 12/5/23 at 10:08 a.m., the DSD walked by the nurses' station and noticed the computer screen on top of the medication cart open. The DSD stated the Medication Administration Record (MAR, a record of medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO - person who routinely visits the facility and advocates for the residents in the nursing homes) for 28 out of 31 discharged residents reviewed when: 1. Resident 49 went for dialysis and was transferred to the hospital; 2. Resident 50 was transferred to the hospital; and 3. Social service director (SSD) failed to notify the State LTCO for 26 more resident discharges in a period of 3 months (September-[DATE]). This failure had the potential to compromise the resident's admission, transfer, and discharge rights. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 49's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (heart problems that occur because of high blood pressure that is present over a long time), unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to encode and transmit in a timely manner the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a tool used for resident assessment) for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident 29 and 14) when: 1. The MDS nurse (MDSN) used a wrong assessment reference date (ARD - date of the MDS assessment) for Resident 29's Skilled Nursing Facility Part A Prospective Payment System Discharge Assessment (SNF Part A PPS DC - a required assessment to determine resident's last day of skilled services and resident's current status); and 2. Resident 14's two MDS Entry Tracking's were transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid System (CMS) late. These failures resulted in wrong ARD MDS assessment submitted to CMS and Entry Tracking's not received by CMS within the time requirement. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 29's clinical record titled admission Record, indicated, Resident 29 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including ataxia (no coordination due to lose muscle control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries (an area of skin that breaks down when something keeps rubbing or pressing against the skin) received care, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries for one of three residents (Resident 40) at risk for pressure injuries when licensed nurses did not follow Resident 40's doctor's order to prevent pressure injuries and did not update Resident 40's care plan. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 40's development of pressure injuries. Findings: Review of Resident 40's clinical record titled, admission Record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including disorder of the autonomic nervous system (a dysfunction of the nerves that regulate nonvoluntary functions, such as heart rate, blood pressure, and sweating), chronic (persisting for a long time or constantly recurring) atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), anxiety disorder (a mental illness that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate communication with the dialysis center for one of two residents on dialysis (Resident 21), when the communication form sections which are to be filled out by the facility and dialysis center was not completed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 21's negative health outcome. Findings: Review of Resident 21's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a condition which affects the way the body processes blood sugar) due to underlying condition with foot ulcer (open sores or lesions that will not heal or that return over a long period of time), metabolic encephalopathy (an alteration in consciousness caused due to brain dysfunction) , multiple sclerosis (a disease affecting the brain and spinal cord that disrupts the communication of the brain and the rest of the body) and chronic kidney disease with heart failure (A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) were accurately accounted for on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the Controlled Drug Record (CDR) for one of three randomly selected residents (Resident 44). This failure resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for abuse or misuse of this medication. Findings: A review of Resident 44's clinical record indicated she had a physician's order, dated 11/8/23, for Norco (hydrocodone-acetaminophen, a controlled medication for pain) 5-325 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/7/23 at 9:29 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), a review of Resident 44's CDR for Norco and the 10/2023 MAR reflected the nursing staff removed one tablet of Norco on 10/20/23 at 6 p.m., and on 10/24/23 at 9 p.m., without documenting in the MAR that they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist's medication regime review (MMR) recommendations for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 16) were acted upon. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 16's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness or loss of interest) and vascular dementia (decline in thinking skills caused by blocked or reduced blood flow to the brain). Review of Resident 16's document titled Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber, written by the consultant pharmacist (CP) and dated 4/19/23, indicated: This resident has been taking the antidepressant Zoloft 150 mg. (milligrams, unitof measurement) for depression since 12/21, please evaluate the current dose and consider a dose reduction. Review of a physician telephone order, dated 4/26/23, indicated Resident 16's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comply with Federal and State laws, and regulations when the approval letter for staffing waiver was not posted where visitors, family and residents could easily read. This failure had the potential to result in nurse staffing misinformation about residents' care. Findings: During an observation on 12/4/2023 at 1:30 p.m., the facility's postings in a locked glass frame located at the hallway entrance included the facility's license posted but no staffing waiver letter of approval posted. During another observation of the facility's postings in a locked glass frame on 12/5/2023 at 4:05 p.m., the staffing waiver letter of approval was not posted. During a concurrent observation and interview with the facility's administrator in training (AIT) on 12/7/20023 at 2:03 p.m., the AIT reviewed all the postings in a locked glass frame located at the hallway entrance. The AIT confirmed she couldn't find the staffing waiver letter of approval. AIT stated the staffing waiver letter of approval should have been posted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that part of a handrail in the hallway was firmly affixed and secured to the wall. This failure had the potential to cause injuries to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/6/23 at 9:23 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F and CNA G, CNA F confirmed that the handrail in the hallway going to the dining area was loose and wiggly. CNA F stated the residents used the handrail to grab on for support. CNA G stated, it's loose and it should be fixed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/7/23 at 9:17 a.m., with the Maintenance Director (MD), the MD confirmed that the handrail was loose and stated it was missing a screw. MD stated he was not aware of the issue. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/7/23 at 9:29 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON confirmed that the handrail was loose. During a review of the facility's Handrails policy, dated 3/1/23, indicated The facility will equip corridors with a handrail on each side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure the proper sanitization levels of the dishwasher and 2-compartment sink, when kitchen staff did not properly check the sanitizer strength in the dishwasher nor in the 2-compartment sink. This failure had the potential of causing a facility-wide food borne illness. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 6/28/22 at 8:39 a.m., with a cook (Cook I), [NAME] I stated, the cook in the morning needs to checks washer sanitizer. Water temp should be 140F degrees , it is 119F degrees. [NAME] I ran the dishwasher twice, the temperature was at 120F degrees. [NAME] I tested the dishwasher sanitizer by holding test paper in the sanitizer water for 10 seconds, which she confirmed, then read the results. During an observation and concurrent interview on 6/28/22 at 10:53 a.m. with [NAME] I, [NAME] I stated, we don't check the sanitizer for the compartment sink. The sanitizer is added one Tbs of sanitizer per gallon of water, which she pointed to a cup, indicated a small amount. [NAME] I was not sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control practices and precautions when: 1. Facility staff did not ensure visitors were thoroughly screened for signs and symptoms of Covid-19 (an acute respiratory illness in humans caused by a coronavirus, capable of producing severe symptoms and in some cases death, especially in older people and those with underlying health conditions) and did not give directions on screening; 2. Facility staff did not clean and disinfect the thermometer in the screening area after each use; and 3. One facility staff did not perform hand hygiene before glove use. These failures have the potential to spread infection and to compromise the health and well-being of the residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/27/2022 at 8:37 a.m., surveyors were in the main entrance lobby. Licensed vocational nurse F (LVN F) asked for surveyors' vaccination status but did not screen surveyors for signs and symptoms of Covid-19, no instructions on screening and did not take surveyor's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four controlled medications ( medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration) which are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record keeping in the facility) had been accurately accounted for in the two of two medication carts checked when the amount of medications counted from the blister cards (a pharmacy-prepared paperboard with medications in individual doses that can be punched out of the card when administered) were not consistent with the narcotic count sheet for three controlled medications, and one controlled medications was signed out before dispensing and administering the medication to resident. These failures had the potential to create problems related to accounting of controlled medications. Findings: During an inspection of medication cart # 1 (Men's side) with licensed vocational nurse C (LVN C) on 6/27/22 at 9:18 a.m., LVN C stated at the start of each shift, two nurses (incoming and outgoing nurses) should count the controlled drugs and affix their signatures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 12 sampled residents (Residents 20, 25 and 29) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors, example is antipsychotics) when: 1. Resident 20 had no informed consent signed prior to the administration of Duloxetine (Cymbalta, antidepressant). 2. Resident 25 did not have a documented clinical rationale or justification for the continued use of Olanzapine (antipsychotic- medication used to manage psychosis including delusion or hallucinations)when the recommended GDR was declined by her primary care physician (PCP). 3. Resident 29, did not have an informed consent signed for the dose increase of Seroquel (used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) from 50mg. ( milligrams, unit of measurement) to 75mg. per day. These failures resulted in the unnecessary use of psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 20's clinical record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare the puree meals to meet the nutritive value needed for 9 of 9 residents who receive a puree diet, when: 1. the cook added water and thickener to the pureed vegetables, 2. the bread and cake, which were on the menu, were not pureed nor served to the residents who are on a puree diet. These failures had the potential of the residents who received a puree diet to not receive the appropriate nutrients/calories. Findings: During an observation on 6/28/22 at 11 a.m. of kitchen cook (Cook H), after cooking the Italian blend vegetables, [NAME] H drained the vegetables using a colander. He then added less than one cup of water to five scoops of the vegetables and blended it. [NAME] H then placed five scoops of vegetables into robot coupe, added 2 cups water, and blended it. It was runny. He then added 4 scoops of vegetables to robot coupe, blended them, did not added any water. This came out thick thick, used spatula to scoop into container with other pureed veggies, whisked to blend, added thickener, about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to 1. properly label the arrival and/or open date of foods in the kitchen and 2. to keep MedPass formula at proper temperature, when - onions were in a clear bin unlabeled, - three clear containers of pastas were unlabeled, - four open boxes of breakfast cereal were unlabeled, - packets of hot chocolate mix and low calorie instant lemon drink were unlabeled, and - containers of MedPass formula were on medication carts for extended periods without proper refrigeration. These failures had the potential of causing food-borne illness. Findings: 1. During an observation and subsequent interview on 6/28/22 at 8:31 a.m., with the dietary supervisor (DS). It was observed that a clear plastic container containing onions did not have a delivery date on it. DS stated, the clear container of onions needed a date on the outside. During an observation and subsequent interview on 6/28/22 at 9:03 a.m., with DS, there were three containers with pastas without any date on them, four opened boxes of cereal without a date on them, a container…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 20's personal request to have a darker window cover/blinds/shades to prevent eye glare, and to have a over bed light cord string were accommodated; and facilty failed to honor Resident 20's food preferences. These failures resulted in Resident 20's discomfort, and feeling stressed and irritated; and had the potential to result in patient not being able to maintain or achieve independent functioning, dignity, and well being to the extent possible in accordance with the resident's own needs and preferences. Findings: A review of Resident 20's facesheet included diagnoses of sleep disorder, seizures, glaucoma (eye disease that can cause vision loss and blindness) and macular degeneration (an eye disease that can blur the person's central vision). Her care plan on Impaired visaul function, dated 1/8/22 included intervention to provide lighting that avoid glare. 1. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 20 on 6/27/22 at 1:48 p.m., Resident 20 was awake, lying in bed. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident 29 being transferred twice to the hospital. This failure had the potential of Resident 29 being incorrectly transferred. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's electronic record (eRecord), Resident 29 had been transferred to the hospital on 7/29/2020 and again on 11/12/21. During an interview on 6/30/22 at 11:52 a.m. with social services staff (SS), SS stated Ombudsman is supposed to be notified of residents being transferred to the hospital. During an interview on 6/30/22 at 1:25 p.m. SS stated she could not find either notice from Resident 29's transfers to the hospital, which should have been sent to Ombudsman. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice, revised 03/21, the policy and procedure indicated, Residents and/or representatives are notified in writing, and in a language and format they understand . a. Transfer refers to the movement of a resident from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and update the care plans for three of 12 sampled residents (Residents 14, 20 and 28). For Resident 14, there was no care plan developed for scattered skin rashes on her several body parts. For Resident 20, there was no care plan developed for Cymbalta (antidepressant); and the care plan was not revised/updated or implemented for depression to reflect the change of medications, and ambulation. For Resident 28, there was no care plan developed regarding the presence of left eye conjuntivitis; the care plan for impaired visual function was not implemented. A personalized care plan identifies residents' individualized concerns/needs that outlines the care and services needed to meet their needs. Findings: Resident 14 was in bed with During an observation on 6/27/22 at 11:01 a.m., certified nursing assistant H (CNA H) was present in the room with Resident 14 and observed the resident rubbing her back against the sheets and mattress. CNA H noticed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to professional standards of practice for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents 19 and 40). When Resident 19's Depakote (medication to treat certain seizures, mania caused by bipolar disorder) level every 6 months and Resident 40's EKG (electrocardiogram, measures the heart's electrical activity) every 6 months while on Nuplazid (indicated for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis) were not done as ordered. These failures could negatively affect the resident's health, safety, and well-being in the facility. Findings: Review of Resident 19's, clinical record, indicated she was admitted with Schizoaffective disorder (a condition that can make you feel detached from reality and can affect your mood), psychotic disorder with hallucinations (mental disorders in which a person's personality is severely confused and that person loses touch with reality), paranoid personality disorder (mental health condition marked by a pattern of distrust…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A review of Resident 28's facesheet indicated admission on [DATE]. Her MDS dated [DATE] and 5/5/22 indicated impaired vision and difficulty hearing. During an observation on 6/27/22 at 10:09 a.m., Resident 28 was in bed awake, watching TV without any sounds. Resident 28 claimed she had no hearing aid and had difficulty with hearing but could not turn the TV loud enough to hear because the facility would not allow it. Resident claimed she could not reach for her headphones which were hung near the TV set and staff did not offer it to her. Resident 28 also indicated she loved reading books, and she stated, I can't read because of the problem in my eyesight. Resident 28 stated she and her daughter were concerned about her eye and wanted to see the eye specialist. During the concurrent interview with certified nursing assistant G (CNA G) who was at bedside, CNA G validated Resident 28 was not wearing her hearing aid and offered the headphones but she could not make it work. During a record review and concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide a restorative nurse assistant (RNA) program (nursing intervention to assist or promote resident's ability to attain their maximum functional potential) for two residents (20, 28). These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' ability to attain their maximum functional potential and result in a decline of resident's health. Findings: Review of Resident 20's clinical record indicated she was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body), and muscle weakness. Her admission minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 1/6/22 indicated she had functional limitation in range of motion with impairment on both sides of upper and lower extremities, and resident and direct care staff believed she was capable of increased independence in at least some ADLs (activities of daily living, i.e bed mobility, transfer, dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper functioning of a wander guard (a device worn on a resident or their mobility equipment to warn staff of resident possibly leaving the facility) for one resident (Resident 32). This failure has the potential of a resident eloping (leaving the facility without staff's knowledge), and potentially being harmed or killed. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's electronic record (eRecord) on 6/27/22 4:15 p.m., Resident 32's eRecord indicated that he had eloped on 4/26/22, and was found by sign board by staff. Resident 32 was at high risk for elopement. During an interview on 6/29/22 at 4:01 p.m. with the director of nursing (DON), DON stated, Resident 32 eloped. Afterward, he started using a wander guard. The wander guard should be checked weekly. DON stated, she did not see a schedule for checking the wander guard in the physicians orders. During an interview on 6/30/22 at 11:35 a.m., DON stated, physicians orders were started after you pointed them out to me. DON stated, checks for wanderguard,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist performed a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for one of four residents (Resident 29) when Resident 29 was missing some monthly MRRs. This failure had the potential of residents being administered incorrect medications. Findings: During an interview on 6/30/22 at 2:36 p.m., with the director of nursing (DON), DON stated, in 12/2020 we were in a full COVID outbreak, so no, the pharmacist did not do a MRR. DON stated, the facility had a temporary pharmacist, but we were not introduced to them. During a review of Resident 29's eRecord and the binder for the facility's MRR, both records indicated, Resident 29 did not have a MRR for: 12/2020, 5/2021, 10/2021, 11/2021, 4/12/22, 5/13/22. The facility was not able to provide a copy of a MRR for those months. During an interview on 7/01/22 at 11:17 a.m., with the consultant pharmacist, (CP), CP stated, she performed a MRR on 12/2020, 4/2022, and 5/2022.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 7.14% (percent) error rate when two medication errors out of 28 opportunities were observed during a medication pass. These failures resulted in the medications not being administered according to the physician orders and the manufacturer's specifications. Findings: A review of Resident 8's physician order dated 4/25/22 indicated Insulin Aspart Solution 100 units/ml. (milliliter, units of measurement), inject 8 units subcutaneously (under the skin) before meals for type 2 diabetis mellitus( a disorder in which the body does not produce enough or respond normally to insulin, causing blood sugar levels to be abnormally high). During the medication pass observation on 6/28/22, at 4:54 p.m., licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) prepared Resident 8's medication of Aspart insulin (medication to lower blood sugar) and was about to administer to Resident 8. When LVN A rechecked the insulin syringe, LVN A verified the syringe contained 7 units and she had to add one more unit to complete the correct dose of 8 units. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurses stored, disposed/discard medications per manufacturer's recommendations when: 1. One multi-dose vial of tuberculin solution (drug use to help diagnose tuberculosis)was dated when opened. 2. One pack of Tylenol (analgesic and antipyretic-for fever) suppository (inserted via rectum) was not stored together with Refresh eye drops (drug used to lubricate dry eyes). 3. One bottle of Fluticasone nasal spray (drug used to relieve symptoms of rhinitis such as sneezing and a runny, stuffy nose) opened on 5/18/22 was disposed/discarded from the medication cart. 4. One container of Breo Ellipta (drug used for asthma) 100-25 mcg. (micrograms, unit of measurement) inhaler opened on 4/10/22 , marked by pharmacy discard after 42 days from opened date was disposed beyond the discard date. 5. The medication refrigerator's temperature was not checked and recorded twice per day per facility's guidelines when storing testing solution (i.e. tuberculin solution). These failures had the potential of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident' 20s food allergy was considered, and dislikes were followed. This failure could compromise and affect Resident 20's clinical condition and could potentially result in complications. Findings: A review of Resident 20's Order Summary Report included allergies such as fish, bean, pineapple .etc. Her dietary indicated she was allergic to beans and dislikes carrots. During a lunch observation on 6/28/22 at 12:50 p.m., certified nursing assistant G (CNA G) provided Resident 20's lunch tray with some beans mixed in the food served. It also included cooked vegetables and carrots. This observation was validated by CNA G. During the concurrent interview, Resident 20 stated she was allergic to beans and would not eat carrots at all. Resident 20 claimed staff continued to provide her with food that included beans and carrots and she would just set them aside. Resident also claimed the staff were aware she does not want carrots. During the interview and concurrent record review with the registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure multiple rooms had at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident had the potential to compromise the care and services the residents receive. Findings: During the initial pool observation on 4/7/2025 at 9:35 a.m., the following was observed: Room Beds Sq.ft./Room Sq.Ft./Resident 1 3 224.28 74.76 2 3 194.67 64.89 3 3 194.67 64.89 6 3 194.67 64.89 7 3 194.67 64.89 12 3 189.03 63.01 14 2 140.52 70.26 15 2 146.46 73.23 During multiple observations and staff and resident interview during survey, there were no care issues identified regarding the size of the rooms. Recommended continuance of the room waiver.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure multiple rooms had at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident had the potential to compromise the care and services the residents receive. Findings: During the initial pool observation on 12/4/2023 at 9:16 a.m., the following was observed: Room Beds Sq.ft./Room Sq.Ft./Resident 1 3 224.28 74.76 2 3 194.67 64.89 3 3 194.67 64.89 6 3 194.67 64.89 7 3 194.67 64.89 12 3 189.03 63.01 14 2 140.52 70.26 15 2 146.46 73.23 During an interview with the administrator in training (AIT) on 12/7/2023 at 2:17 p.m., the AIT confirmed rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were additional room waiver request. The AIT stated these additional rooms are not going to change their total licensed beds. The AIT further stated the additional rooms would allow them to accommodate resident's needs. During multiple observations and staff and resident interview during survey, there were no care issues identified regarding the size of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-07-01 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure multiple rooms had at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident had the potential to compromise the care and services the residents receive. Findings: During the initial pool observation on 6/27/2022 at 9:35 a.m., the following was observed: Room Beds Sq ft./Room Sq. ft./Resident 1 3 224.28 74.76 2 3 194.67 64.89 6 3 194.67 64.89 12 3 189.03 63.01 14 2 140.52 70.26 15 2 146.46 73.23 During observations and staff and resident interviews during survey, there were no care issues identified regarding the size of the rooms. Recommended continuance of the room waiver.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,261 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-12-05
- $8,151 — penalty dated 2024-12-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHYTONIC HOLDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 04/10/2024 |
| AMM TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 04/10/2024 |
| SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 60% | since 04/10/2024 |
| MCCORMACK, RYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 24% | since 04/10/2024 |
| O'SHEA, BRADY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 04/10/2024 |
| ANG, LILIBETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| AWERBUCK, MATTHEW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| CONRAD, TIERRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| CRETIN, CLAIRE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| GONZALEZ-ESPINOZA, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/30/2024 |
| KAAE, BRETT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
| LOPEZ ANAYA, MOISES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $379K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555712. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.