Bridgewood Post Acute
5901 Lemon Hill Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95824 · For profit - Individual · 49 certified beds · (916) 383-2741 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.51 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.0%CMS range 27.2–46.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.5–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 82.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.3–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 47.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.19 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 1 threw a plate on Resident 2's face. This failure resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a laceration on the right eyebrow. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in October 2024 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), anxiety disorder (significant and uncontrollable feelings of anxiety and fear), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect two of five sampled residents' (Resident 3 and Resident 4) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident when:Resident 1 punched Resident 4, andResident 2 punched Resident 3 in his right eye.These failures had the potential to cause physical/mental harm to Resident 3 and Resident 4.Findings:1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave. It may result in a mix of hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking and behavior).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (a standardized assessment tool used in nursing homes), dated 12/5/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating Resident 1 had moderate mental and cognitive impairments.Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in February of 2025 with diagnoses that included Parkison's disease (a movement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2) when Resident 2 pushed Resident 1's wheelchair from behind causing Resident 1 to react impulsively and strike Resident 2 on the hand.This failure had potential to cause harm and psychosocial distress. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (mental condition that is characterized by symptoms of schizophrenia, including delusions and hallucinations, with mood disorder symptoms such as depression or mania), borderline personality disorder (mental health condition causing unstable emotions characterized by impulsivity and difficulty regulating feelings), and bipolar disorder (mental health condition causing extreme mood swings from manic highs to depressive lows).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 10/6/25, indicated Resident 1 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) from having a physical altercation when Resident 2 bumped Resident 1 with his wheelchair and Resident 1 struck Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing frustration and Resident 2 experiencing physical injury to his face. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with multiple diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the tonsil (tonsil cancer), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids), and severe protein calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of calories and protein to maintain nutritional status).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 6/16/25, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- tool to assess cognition) score of 12 out of 15 that indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's Change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% for three of six sampled residents from Medication Administration (Resident 25, 37, and 447), when; 1. For Resident 25, a licensed nurse did not administer resident's prescribed haloperidol (medication used to treat nervous, emotional, and mental conditions) as it was prescribed by the doctor. 2. For Resident 37, a licensed nurse did not follow the instructions on the medication label for resident's divalproex sodium (medication used to treat certain types of seizures). 3(a). For Resident 447, a licensed nurse did not follow the instructions on the medication label for resident's mycophenolate (medication used to prevent organ transplant rejection), and (b). For Resident 447, a licensed nurse did not administer resident's prescribed Aspirin (medication used for pain or inflammation) as it was prescribed by the doctor. As a result, 4 errors were identified out of 27 opportunities for error during the observation of medication administration; the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly, when unlabeled loose pills and labeled pharmaceutical products were found behind the drawers and in the back of medication cart A. These failures had the potential for medication error, misuse and drug diversion. Findings: During an inspection of the Medication Cart A on 6/2/25 at 9:31 a.m., four unlabeled loose pills and four labeled pharmaceutical products were found behind the drawers and in the back of medication cart A. During an interview on 6/2/24 at 9:48 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 removed the pills found on the bottom of the drawer and confirmed there were 4 loose pills. LN 1 also confirmed there were 4 labeled medications found at the back of the cart behind the drawers. LN 1 stated the loose pills or the misplaced medication blister packs in the back can lead to a mediation error. LN 1 stated, the cart should have been checked every day to make sure medications did not fall in the back. During an interview on 6/2/25 at 11:41 a.m. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four dietary staff had the appropriate skill set to safely perform the daily operations of the food and nutrition services department when: 1. Two Dietary Aides were not able to verbalize the process of manual dishwashing with 3-compartment sink (cross refer to F812, #8), and 2. Two Cooks did not perform handwashing before touching the clean dishes at the clean side of the dishwashing machine (cross refer to F812, #9) These failures had the potential to place 45 out of 47 highly susceptible residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen at risk for food borne illness. Findings: 1. During an interview on 6/2/25 at 10:06 a.m. with Dietary Aide (DA) 1, DA 1 verbalized the manual dishwashing procedure by using the 3-compartment sink. He stated he would switch to manual dishwashing when the dishwashing machine was not working. He explained the kitchen had a 2-compartment sink for wash and rinse, and used an extra tub for the sanitize step as a third compartment. DA 1 was unable to answer the immersion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for the therapeutic diet during lunch meal on 6/3/25 when: 1. One resident (Resident 26) with a diet of mechanical soft (MS) texture diets (a diet consisting of soft, moist foods for people who have chewing and/or swallowing difficulties) and small portions received the wrong portion for the meat. 2. One resident (Resident 13) with diet of MS, CCHO (diet where number of sugars and starches are controlled), and Renal (special diet to avoid foods that can be harmful to kidneys) received brown rice instead of wheat pasta. 3. One resident (Resident 22) with MS diet received parsley sprig for garnish instead of parsley flakes 4. Six residents (Resident 12, 34, 35, 37, 38, and 43) did not receive parsley sprig garnishes with their lunch meals. These failures had the potential to result in compromising the medical and nutrition status of nine out 45 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. The census was 47. Findings: During the lunch meal distribution on 6/3/25 beginning at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served, or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food service in a safe manner when: 1. The ice machine was not clean. 2. Found pans stacked wet and had food debris stored at the clean and ready-to-use storage area. 3. Found opened packaged food products with improper labeling and dating procedure in the reach-in refrigerator and reach-in freezer. 4. Found food products that stated, keep frozen, stored in the dry storage area. 5. Found produces were not fresh stored in dry storge area. 6. Found personal belonging stored in dry storage area. 7. One Dietary Aide used a mask to replace the beard net and not covered the facial hair completely. 8. Two Dietary Aides were not able to verbalize the process of manual dishwashing with 3-compartment sink correctly. 9. Two Cooks did not perform handwashing before touching the clean dishes at the clean side of the dishwashing machine. 10. There were issues found in the resident's food refrigerator at the ice room: a. One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for a census of 47 when: 1. rooms [ROOM NUMBER] had broken/missing wardrobe drawers. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a cracked toilet seat and a broken call light in the bathroom. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] and 115 had missing call lights in the bathrooms. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken windowsill lying on the floor with nails sticking up. These failures resulted in non-functional rooms and an unsafe environment. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Contractor on 6/4/25 at 11:32 a.m., the Contractor verified and confirmed room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken wardrobe drawer (2nd bottom drawer from the left) and room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken, misaligned, and unable to open wardrobe drawer (2nd middle drawer from the top and bottom right drawer). room [ROOM NUMBER] had the 2nd drawer from the top missing from the wardrobe. During an interview with the Contractor on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 30) was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (drug prescribed to affect the mind, emotions or behavior) when he was prescribed an antianxiety medication without adequate indication. This failure placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medication use and excessive sedation. Findings: A review of Resident 30's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 30's Order Summary Report, dated 6/3/25, included active orders for lorazepam 1 mg, 1 tablet, twice a day for dementia with behaviors as manifested by yelling and removing clothes and to monitor Resident 30 closely for signs of significant side effects such as sedation drowsiness or confusion and to give special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards of quality for one of 16 sampled residents, Resident 33, when the Director of Nursing (DON) removed, and did not measure the length of Resident 33's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, thin, and long plastic tube that goes into a vein in your arm and ends in a large vein close to your heart) before throwing it in the trash can. This deficient practice had the potential risk of not removing the full length of the catheter and causing infection. Findings: A review of Resident 33's Clinical Record indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses that included infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis (artificial implants) and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aerus (MRSA, a serious, potentially fatal, bacterial infection [diseases that can affect your skin, lungs, brain, blood and other parts of your body]). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for one of 46 residents (Resident 25) when: Resident 25's haloperidol (medication used to treat nervous, emotional, and mental conditions) was not available to administer in the dose prescribed by the doctor. This failure had the potential for medication error and disruption of the resident's treatment plan. Findings: During an observation of medication administration on 6/3/25 at 7:41 a.m., Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4) was observed to prepare Resident 25's morning medications which included haloperidol 5 mg (milligram, unit of measure). Reconciliation of the observed medication administration for Resident 25's current Physician Orders, dated 6/2/25, indicated, haloperidol oral tablet 5 mg. Give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time a day for schizophrenia (a chronic mental and brain disorder) . (0.5 tab =2.5 mg). During an interview on 6/3/25 at 7:41 a.m., with LN 4, LN 4 stated, I cannot administer resident's medication without clarifying it. There is a discrepancy with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the availability and timely administration of medications for four of 15 sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, 7, and 9) when: 1. Resident 2 did not receive a dose of Venlafaxine (A drug used to treat depression and certain anxiety disorders) and two doses of Clonazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety), 2. Resident 3 did not receive four doses of Clozapine (a medication that treats mental health conditions like schizophrenia - a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), 3. Resident 7 did not receive four doses of Haloperidol Decanoate injection (Haldol, medication used to treat schizophrenia), and 4. Resident 9 did not receive nine doses of Clozapine and three doses of Austedo (a medication used to treat movement disorders). These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' mental health and stability. Findings: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan to prevent falls was implemented for one resident (Resident 1) for a census of 47. This failure increased Resident 1's risk of falling, which could result in injury. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including conversion disorder (a mental health condition where psychological stress is expressed as physical symptoms) with decreased coordination or balance and episodes of involuntary muscle contractions and spasms. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/13/25, indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment with BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- an assessment used to screen and identify memory, orientation, and status of the resident) score of 10 out of 15. Resident 1's functional abilities indicated she had impairment on both lower extremities and used a wheelchair for mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a specific care plan for weight loss and pressure ulcer/injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for one resident (Resident 1) out three sampled residents, that included measurable objectives and timeframes. This failure had the potential to compromise the nutritional and health status for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses which included sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), hypertensive heart (high blood pressure) and chronic kidney disease. A review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary team (IDT) note dated 9/23/24, indicated there was a weight change of 5.7%. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 9/12/24, indicated, Sacrococcyx, stage 4 PU (pressure ulcer)-cleanse with NS/Vashe (normal saline moistened gauze), pat dry. Apply scant medihoney and cal alginate, lightly pack with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures (P&P) for the prohibition and prevention of abuse for a census of 48 residents when two out of five sampled facility staff (Certified Nurse Assistant [CNA] 1 and CNA 2) were actively working in the facility without an initial background check (a formal process that verifies an upcoming employee's personal and professional information such as identity, work history, criminal record, and any other relevant information) done. This failure placed all the residents in the facility at risk for possible serious physical and/or psychosocial harm and decreased the facility' ability to protect residents from exposure to an employee with a criminal history of abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation. Findings: During an interview on 9/3/24 at 1:12 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated she has been working as a CNA (provides vital support to both residents and nurses which includes assisting, transporting, bathing, and feeding patients, stocking medical supplies, and logging patient information) in the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment was provided for seven of 18 sampled residents (Resident 9, Resident 18, Resident 153, Resident 253, Resident 254, Resident 255, and Resident 256), when a cabinet and closet drawers were in disrepair, with chipped paint, and the walls were empty and bare inside the residents' rooms. This failure had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: Resident 9 was admitted in late 2011 and readmitted in early 2022 with diagnoses which included stroke and weakness. During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 6/19/24, the MDS indicated Resident 9 had mild memory impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/9/24 at 8:35 a.m. in Resident 9's room, the cabinet drawers and closet doors were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, documented care plans for four of 18 sampled residents (Resident 18, Resident 15, Resident 204, and Resident 19), when: 1. Resident 18 had no documented care plan for the isolation precautions; 2. Resident 15 had no documented care plan for skin integrity; 3. Resident 204 had no documented care plan for the use of dentures; and 4. Resident 19 had no documented care plan for medication combined with other medications. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for unmet needs and as well as the potential to negatively impact their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses which included chronic lung disease and pneumonia (lung infection). During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 4/21/24, the MDS indicated Resident 18 had no memory impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, toileting). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) for the accurate accountability of controlled medications (medications with a high potential for abuse and addiction) when controlled drug count records (a record used to reconcile inventory of controlled medications in the medication cart by the outgoing and incoming nurse during a shift change) were not routinely signed by the outgoing and incoming nursing shifts, and ensure controlled substance medications were accurately accounted for on the medication administration record (MAR) and Controlled Drug Record (CDR) for two of three randomly selected residents (Residents 6 and 45). These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications, and the potential for abuse or misuse of these medications. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/8/24 at 1:54 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), the controlled drug sign-in/sign-out sheets, dated April 2024 to July 2024, for Medication Cart B were reviewed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure multi-dose medications were dated with an open and discard date to ensure they were not used beyond the discard date, prescription medications were appropriately labeled with a pharmacy label or name to correctly identify which resident they were for, medications with different routes of administration were stored in accordance with facility policy and procedures (P&P), and expired medications were not available for resident use. The deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date, incorrect medications from inadequate labeling, medications given incorrectly through the wrong route of administration. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/8/24 at 8:27 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) in Medication Storage room [ROOM NUMBER], the following was identified: 1 box hemorrhoidal (medication to treat swollen and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide alternatives to the meal entree that were of similar nutritive value. This had the potential of leading to protein/calorie malnutrition for the 44 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/8/24 at 10:34 a.m., in the hallway outside the kitchen, Dietary Supervisor 1 (DS 1) showed the alternatives that residents can choose if they did not desire the menu meal. Included on the list was a grilled cheese sandwich. DS 1 explained that when ordered 2.5 hours prior to the meal, she would cross off the entrée and write in the desired item onto the meal ticket. During an observation of the lunch meal plating on 7/9/24 at 12:21 p.m., DS 1 stated that the dialysis lunch bags contained shelf stable items such as fruit cups, but when the nurse came to collect the bag for the resident, staff would add a sandwich such as peanut butter and jelly. During an interview on 7/10/24 at 11:18 a.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD explained that she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff provided the correct portions when plating the consistent carbohydrate diet. This had the potential of leading to poor blood sugar control for the 11 residents (Residents 9, 13, 18, 28, 30, 33, 41, 153, 253, 255, and 453) eating the controlled carbohydrate diet (CCHO). Findings: During an observation of the lunch meal plating on 7/9/24 at 11:50 a.m., [NAME] 1 (Ck 1) was setting up the steamtable for the meal service. The meal included polenta which was noted to have two scoops, one with a grey handle (1/2 cup) and one with a green handle (1/3 cup). During an observation of the meal plating on 7/9/24 starting at 12:00 p.m., the residents receiving a CCHO diet were given polenta using the green handle scoop. Review of the facility provided Cook's spreadsheet for the Summer Menus, Week 2 Tuesday indicated that the CCHO diet was to receive a #16 scoop which was equal to ¼ of a cup. During this same meal plating, those on the CCHO diet were observed to receive a half portion of chocolate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food safety in order to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness when: 1) Opened food items were not protected and sealed after opening; 2) Food labeling process was not followed when drinks on a tray in the refrigerator were not labeled and dated, and almond extract did not have a readable use-by date; 3) Unclean food service items, including a food processor bowl, were found with brown build-up, along with a cutting board which was noted to have food residue on the cutting surface; 4) Paint on the kitchen walls, sink backsplash, and ceilings were found to be chipped, stained, and covered with glue-like build-up; 5) Two packages of lunch meat were not thawed per standards when they were observed in a steam table container filled with static (non-running) water in the cook's sink; 6) Two alcohol sanitizer containers were accessible by dietary staff in the kitchen; 7) Dishwashing was not done according to standards when two steam…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control guidelines and practices for a census of 44 when: 1. Transmission based precautions were not followed for contact/droplet infection for Resident 18; 2. Bandage scissors were not cleaned during wound care treatment for Resident 13; 3. There were no Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, involves use of gown and gloves during high contact resident care designed to reduce transmission of Multi Drug Resistant Organisms [MDRO, bacteria resistant to antibiotics]) in place for Resident 2's wound care and indwelling catheter; 4. There was no EBP in place for Resident 19; 5. Resident 453's isolation trashcan was not covered; and 6. A toothbrush, balled up paper towels were found on the floor, and a commode with white spots over the seat were found in an adjoining resident bathroom. These failures increased the risk for transmission of infections. Findings: 1. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in early 2024 with diagnoses which included chronic lung disease and pneumonia (lung infection).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 153), when the fall risk care plan was not updated after a fall incident. This failure had the potential to result in further falls and injuries. Findings: Resident 153 was admitted to the facility in late 2023 with diagnoses which included stroke, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, and expressive language disorder. During a review of Resident 153's Nursing Care Plan (NCP) dated 2/2/24, the NCP indicated, [Resident 153] is at risk for falls and/or injuries related to falls .poor safety awareness . During a review of Resident 153's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 5/6/24, the MDS indicated Resident 153 had moderate memory impairment, had a history of falls, non-English speaker, and needed extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). During a review of Resident 153's Nursing Progress Notes (NPN), dated 7/6/24, the NPN indicated, Fall Risk .Disoriented x3 at all times .1-2 falls in past 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with acceptable professional standards of quality for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 45) when nursing staff failed to verify the contents of a probiotic (a supplement to support and promote gut health) administered to Resident 45. This failure resulted in Resident 45 receiving the incorrect probiotic and the potential for worsening of their clinical condition or complications related to gut health such as diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 7/8/24 at 12:15 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 was observed preparing ten medications for Resident 45, including lactobacillus with pectin (a probiotic used to maintain or promote gut health) 200 million cells per capsule, 2 capsules. A review of Resident 45's medical record indicated a physician's order, dated 5/23/24, for saccharomyces boulardii (a probiotic), 1 capsule three times a day for supplement. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/8/24 at 1:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility provided care and services consistent with professional standards for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 15) when a pressure ulcer/injury (PU/PI, localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue from prolonged pressure on the skin) was found on his right heel. This failure resulted in Resident 15 developing an unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness skin and tissue loss) to his right heel. Findings: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in mid-2023 with diagnoses which included diabetes (uncontrolled blood sugar), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), dependence on renal dialysis, acute kidney failure (a disorder of the kidneys when they cannot filter waste products from the blood). A review of Resident 15's clinical record did not include the following documents: a care plan with interventions for a skin assessment, repositioning, monitoring, offloading, heel protectors and/or hygiene/shower. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status when two of 5 sampled residents (Residents 16 and Resident 33) lost 20 pounds or more over 6 months, without an identified cause and food preferences were not obtained. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 16's and Resident 33's overall health by leading to malnutrition and muscle wasting. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, anemia (low levels of healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout your body), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (disease that affects the body's ability to regulate blood sugar levels), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 33's Face Sheet (FS), dated 7/10/24, indicated Resident 33's primary language was Spanish. Review of Resident 33's weight history includes the following: 1/1/24=111 pounds 4/1/24=99 pounds 7/2/24=87 pounds Resident 33 was noted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 10) was free of a significant medication error when he received Advair Diskus (generic name fluticasone/salmeterol, a medication to treat asthma) 42 times (doses) past the expiration date. This deficient practice had the potential for ineffective use of the Advair Diskus, resulting in breathing complications and worsening of Resident 10's clinical condition. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses which included asthma. A review of Resident 10's medical record indicated a physician's order for fluticasone/salmeterol 250/50 micrograms (mcg, a unit of measurement)/puff, 1 inhalation orally every 12 hours related to unspecified asthma, dated [DATE]. During a concurrent record review and inspection of Medication Cart B on [DATE] at 10:03 a.m. alongside Licensed Nurse 3 LN 3, a Advair Diskus inhaler labeled opened on [DATE] was identified. The manufacturer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to puree zucchini by methods that conserved nutritive value and flavor. This had the potential of leading to poor intake and malnutrition for the four residents (Resident 5, Resident 33, Resident 49, and Resident 153) eating pureed meals. Findings: During an observation on 7/9/24 at 11:03 a.m., [NAME] 1 (Ck 1) pureed the hot foods for the lunch meal service. CK 1 removed 10 quarter pieces of zucchini from the oven and placed the zucchini into the processor bowl. She next added an unmeasured amount of melted butter to the bowl and proceeded to blend the mixture. When processing stopped, the mixture was found to be too thin and runny. Ck 1 proceeded to add an unmeasured (approximately ¼ cup) amount of thickener to the bowl and turned the food processor back on to blend. When Ck1 stopped the processor, she was happy with the consistency and placed the zucchini into a steam table pan and put it into the oven. Review of facility provided Pureed Vegetables Recipe (Healthcare Menus Direct, LLC.) indicated the following ingredients…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain one of the reach-in freezers. This had the potential of leading to food-borne illness for the 44 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 7/8/24 at 9:10 a.m. with Dietary Supervisor 1 (DS 1) two reach-in freezers were observed on the wall leading the outside door. The freezer closet to the outside door was stuffed with roughly 75% meat products and 25% frozen desserts. During a concurrent interview with DS 1, she stated that the freezer usually contained meat products but that one of the freezers was not working and they had to move those items into this freezer. During this same observation on 7/8/24 at 9:16 a.m., the freezer next to it had a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This freezer contained 3 frozen apple pies, a frozen peach pie, and a box of donuts. During a concurrent interview with the DS 1, she stated that this was the freezer that was not working and would be fixed today or tomorrow. During a visit to the kitchen on 7/9/24 at 10:56 a.m., the DS was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection prevention and control practices for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1, and Resident 2) when: 1. Oxygen tubing was not labeled, 2. Urinal ½ full of a yellow amber colored fluid was found sitting on top of the bedside table. 3. The floor has multiple white shiny pieces of food laying on the floor next to the bed. 4. Urinal was mislabeled. During an initial tour on 6/12/24 at 12:35 p.m., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] with three residents, Resident 2's bedside table had a urinal with yellow amber colored fluid in it, multiple white shiny pieces of food on the floor next to the bed. Resident 1 has a mislabeled urinal on his bedside table and his oxygen tubing was not labeled. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/12/24 at 12:40 p.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated, That trash on the floor we don't even know what that is. I think it's an eggshell . CNA also confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when Resident 2 struck him in the face and head. This failure had the potential to result in serious physical injury for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted in 5/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side. A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/16/24, indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident 1's clinical record included the following documents: A nursing progress note, dated 4/5/24 and written by the Director of Nursing (DON), indicated a certified nursing assistant (CNA) had heard scuffling coming from Resident 1 and Resident 2's room around 6 a.m. that morning and upon entering the room saw Resident 2 hitting Resident 1 in the face and head. The note indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control program guidelines and practices were maintained for a census of 44, when: 1. Licensed Nurse 6 (LN 6) did not sanitize hands and changed gloves during wound dressing change for Resident 3; 2. Unlabeled and undated opened humidifiers found at the bedside of Resident 153; 3. Outdated humidifier was used for Resident 155; 4. Used coffee mugs and office equipment were found on top of a folding table in the dining room; 5. Nursing staff did not perform hand hygiene during direct resident care in an isolation room; and 6. Infection Preventionist (IP) verbalized no knowledge of infection control and prevention. These failures had the potential to result in transmission and spread of infection for a vulnerable population. Findings: 1. Resident 3 was admitted in early 2022 with diagnoses which included leg paralysis, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, and depression. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 5/10/23, the MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and dignified atmosphere for dining for a facility census of 44 residents, when residents waited for their meals while the other residents were eating. This failure resulted in the residents' frustration and anger when residents were not all served meals at the same time. Findings: During a dining observation on 6/26/23, beginning at 12:33 p.m. in the residents' dining room, 10 residents were present, some with meals and others without meals. There were five tables with two residents sitting together at each table in the dining room. Three of the tables with two residents had their meals served. During an interview on 6/26/23, at 12:40 p.m., with Resident 152, Resident 152 stated she had been waiting ten minutes for lunch that usually comes at 12:00 p.m. Resident 152 stated she was frustrated and did not want to wait. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/26/23, at 12:49 p.m., with Restorative Nursing Aide 1 (RNA 1), it was observed two tables with four residents still had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' needs were accommodated for four of 22 sampled residents (Resident 27, Resident 32, and Resident 154), when: 1. Call light was broken and no call bell was provided to Resident 27, Resident 32 and Resident 154. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an observation on 6/26/23, at 9:15 a.m., the call light outside Resident 27, Resident 32 and Resident 154's rooms flashed continuously. During a review of the facility binder labeled, Maintenance Log, on 6/26/23, the maintenance log did not indicate any entry reporting a problem with the call light system 1.a. Resident 27 was admitted in early 2023 with diagnoses which included left ankle fracture, left ankle and foot pain, muscle weakness, and depression. During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 4/22/23, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and a homelike environment was provided for three of 22 sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 153), when: 1. The immediate environment was empty and walls were bare in Resident 22's room; and 2. A dirty commode was found at Resident 153's bedside; These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 22 was admitted in early 2020 and readmitted in late 2022 with diagnoses which included inability to communicate following a stroke, difficulty swallowing, reduced mobility, anxiety, and depression. During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 5/28/23, the MDS indicated Resident 22 had severe memory impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). During an observation on 6/27/23, at 9:41 a.m., Resident 22 was found lying in bed, awake, alert and verbally non-responsive. Resident 22's bedside table and night stand were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the instructions needed for effective person-centered care were provided for four of 22 sampled residents (Resident 151, Resident 152, Resident 153 and Resident 155), when the Baseline Care Plan (BCP) was not completed and no copy given to the resident nor the responsible party (RP). This failure had the potential to result in the lack of communication among staff, inadequate care for the resident, and leaving the resident and the RP with no information summarizing the goals, medications, treatments, diet, and discharge plans. Findings: 1. Resident 151 was admitted in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included right leg fracture, right hip pain, and heart failure. During a review of Resident 151's BCP, dated 6/21/23, the BCP indicated Resident 151's primary language was Russian, communicated easily with staff, understood the staff, and did not need interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care worker. There were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the communication needs were met for two of 22 sampled residents (Resident 151 and Resident 37), when there was no communication board or device accessible to the staff to communicate with the residents. This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the residents' highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 151 was admitted in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included right leg fracture, right hip pain, and heart failure. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/26/23, at 9:11 a.m., Resident 151 was in bed, alert and awake, verbal and responsive speaking her native language. When asked how she was doing, Resident 151 stated, No English. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/26/23, at 9:14 a.m., with License Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 verified there was no communication board at the bedside, and stated, I don't know how they talk to [Resident 151] .I don't see any communication binder in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from potential accident hazard for two of 22 sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 34), when water coming out from the bathroom sink faucets was too hot to touch. This failure had the potential to result in accidents and burns for Resident 11 and Resident 34. Findings: 1. Resident 11 was admitted in early 2019 and re-admitted in early 2023 with diagnoses which included memory impairment, muscle weakness and infection. During a review of Resident 11's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), the MDS indicated Resident 11 had moderate memory impairment. During a review of Resident 11's Nursing Care Plan (NCP), dated 1/13/23, the NCP indicated the resident had a skin integrity problem. During an observation on 6/26/23, at 9:10 a.m., Resident 11 walked into the bathroom and stated, The water here gets hot sometimes .the water could get really hot. I go to the bathroom and wash my hands and I feel the water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of each resident in a census of 44, when: 1. There was an absence of accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction), when random controlled medication audits for three out of three residents (Resident 17, 30 and 37) did not reconcile; and 2. An efficient system was not in place to accurately document and secure emergency medications (e-Kit). These failures had the potential to allow for abuse or misuse of these medications and the potential for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 17, Resident 30, and Resident 37's MARs (Medication Administration Record)s, medications that were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but were not documented accurately on the (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents. 1. Resident 17 had a physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's consultant pharmacist (CP) failed to identify drug-related issues on one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 31), and act upon the CP's monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) for all residents from January 2023 to June 2023. These failures had the potential for unsafe medication use for all residents in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 31's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on in early 2023 with diagnoses which included unspecified mood disorder, unspecified anxiety disorder and vascular dementia. A review of Resident 31's medical record indicated a physician's order dated 4/24/23 for olanzapine (an antipsychotic) 2.5 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement) 1 tablet at bedtime for mood disorder manifested by angry outburst. During an interview on 6/28/23, at 11:20 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), when asked if the indication for Resident 31's olanzapine was appropriate, LN 2 stated, I don't like the diagnosis for this . I think that is just the behavior that is to be monitored.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure labeling and storage of drugs and medications were followed for a census of 44, when: 1. Discontinued and expired medications were not removed from stock; 2. Medications were not labeled properly to ensure it was used for the correct resident and medications were not dated with an open date and discard date to ensure that they were not used beyond the discard date; and 3. The medication storage room and the medication refrigerator temperatures were not monitored appropriately. These failures had the potential to result in medications being administered not in accordance with physician's order and residents receiving medications with unsafe or reduced potency (measure of strength). Findings: 1. During an inspection of the Medication Storage Room and Refrigerator on 6/26/23, at 8:32 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 confirmed there was a bottle of diphenhydramine (a medication used to relieve symptoms of allergy) 25 mg. (milligrams, a unit of measure) in stock that expired 4/23. LN 1 stated that it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation, and maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 44 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. The garbage can located next to the hand washing sink was soiled and the foot pedal to lift lid was broken; 2. One of two refrigerators and two of three freezers did not have thermometers inside the cold storage areas; 3. New margarine cube in refrigerator was partially unwrapped and exposed to the air; 4. Dented can of yams was in the dry storage area; 5. Fifty pound bag of oatmeal in the dry storage area was open; 6. Six loaves of bread had a delivery date of 6/15/23; 7. Bag of frozen turkey cubes had label that had worn off and was unreadable; 8. Tray of juices, milk, and water in refrigerator were not labeled or dated; 9. Two five pound containers of cottage cheese in refrigerator were opened but not labeled with date opened; 10. Kitchen prep sink did not have an air gap; 11. Logs for dishwasher…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident safety for a census of 44, when the facility did not develop an Antibiotic Stewardship Program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. This failure had the potential to increase resident mortality, increase adverse drug events and drug interactions, and resident infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms. Findings: During an interview with the Infection Preventionist nurse (IP) on 6/28/23 at 2:30 p.m., the IP indicated she was not able to access facility documents related to Antibiotic Stewardship, nor had she received facility training related to Antibiotic Stewardship. The IP presented a binder with multiple documents that had residents' names and the name of the antibiotic the residents were taking or had taken. The rest of each page was blank with no reason or follow up regarding the resident and antibiotics usage. The IP indicated she did not know why the resident may have been taking the antibiotic, the dose, or if the antibiotics had been discontinued. The IP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor residents or staff who had or had not received a Covid-19 vaccine series for a census of 44, when vaccination records were requested but not provided. This failure had the potential to endanger the health and well-being of residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 6/26/23, at 2:30 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) the IP indicated she was not aware of either staff or residents that had received a Covid-19 vaccine, nor was she aware of a process to monitor who had received a Covid-19 vaccine. The IP further indicated she had not seen the policy for monitoring or administering Covid-19 vaccines. The IP further indicated she had not seen the policy for a Covid-19 outbreak. During a review of a facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 5/15/23, the P&P indicated, Residents and staff will be offered the COVID-19 vaccine when vaccine supplies are available .residents and staff will be screened .to determine candidacy for the vaccination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0895 — patternHave a Compliance and Ethics Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement compliance and ethics policy for a census of 44, when a medication temperature monitoring log was falsified. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the quality of pharmaceutical products being stored in a the facility. Findings: During a review of the facility's medication refrigerator and room temperature log sheet on 6/26/23, for the month of June 2023, the log sheet indicated the medication refrigerator temperature was documented, 6/12 AM, 6/13 AM, 6/22 PM, and 6/23 PM, and the medication room temperature was documented, 6/10 PM, 6/11 PM, 6/22 PM, and 6/23 PM. The log sheet indicated, Medication Refrigerator Temp. [temperature] and Medication Room Temp. Monitor BID [twice a day]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/26/23, at 11:07 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated, Usually, the desk nurse is assigned to monitor the AM and PM temperatures for the medication refrigerator and medication room. Upon review of the log for June 2023, the IP stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate call light system was provided for three out of 22 sampled residents (Resident 27, Resident 32 and Resident 154), when the call light was not working. This failure had the potential to negatively affect residents' safety by preventing the residents from communicating a request for assistance when needed. Findings: Resident 27 was admitted in early 2023 with diagnoses which included left ankle fracture, left ankle and foot pain, muscle weakness, and depression. During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 4/22/23, the MDS indicated Resident 27 had mild memory impairment and required supervision assistance with activities of daily living. Resident 32 was admitted in late 2022 with diagnoses which included stroke and depression. During a review of Resident 32's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 32 had severe memory impairment and required limited to extensive assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 29), when a lidocaine (an anesthetic used to treat pain) 5% (percent, a unit of measurement) patch was applied to Resident 29's shoulder blade without ensuring all edges of the patch were adhered and the date, time and initials of the nurse applying it were not documented. This failure had the potential for Resident 29 to not achieve adequate pain relief or be exposed to unwanted side effects of the medication due to incorrect timing of administration. Findings: A review of Resident 29's medical record, dated 5/12/23, indicated a physician's order for lidocaine (an anesthetic used to treat pain) 5% (percent, a unit of measurement) patch, apply to upper back topically in the morning for back pain. During a medication pass observation on 6/26/23, at 10:38 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), LN 1 applied a lidocaine patch to Resident 29's upper left shoulder. LN 1 smoothed the patch onto the resident's shoulder, but an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 33) was at nutritional risk when the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and Registered Dietitian (RD) were not notified of Resident 33's meal refusals for five days. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 33 experiencing weight loss and nutritional deficiencies. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with diagnoses which included stroke and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 4/16/23, the MDS indicated Resident 33 had moderate cognitive impairment, and required supervision for eating. During a review of Resident 33's Registered Dietitian's Nutritional Assessment, dated 4/13/23, the assessment indicated, Resident doesn't state any food likes and dislikes. Per resident he does not eat dinner meals. Will monitor food preferences, meal intake trends and diet tolerance .will also encourage PO [by mouth] and Fluid intake .Current PO intake 50-60% of needs (inadequate). Resident stated he is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 31) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when Resident 31 received psychotropic medication without adequate indication for use and was not being appropriately monitored. This failure resulted in unnecessary medication for the resident, which had the potential for increased risks and exposure of side effects associated with psychotropic medications such as sedation, memory loss, falls and abnormal involuntary movements. Findings: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility in the Spring of 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included unspecified mood disorder, anxiety disorder, vascular dementia (memory and thought impairment) and heart disease. During a record review of Resident 31's Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool) dated 5/3/23, the MDS indicated Resident 31 had moderately impaired cognition (ability to think and understand), no hallucinations, no delusions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functional and comfortable environment when one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 33) did not have a functioning over-the-bed light. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 33 to not have proper lighting to support his needs. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility in early 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included stroke and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 4/16/23, the MDS indicated Resident 33 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/27/2,3 at 10:31 a.m., with Resident 33, observed the over the bed light did not turn on when the chain was pulled. Observed the light did turn on when the wall switch by the door was used. Resident 33 indicated he was unable to walk to the switch by the door to turn on the light. Resident stated he wants the light on when he prays. Resident 33's roommate stated the light had not worked for about two weeks. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMM TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 06/01/2023 |
| SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 05/29/2025 |
| GASTWIRTH, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 25% | since 06/01/2023 |
| MCCORMACK, RYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 20% | since 06/01/2023 |
| O'SHEA, BRADY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 06/01/2023 |
| BRANDI, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| OAKWOOD HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2022 |
| BANUELOS-YERA, MIGUEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/11/2024 |
| BOYES, KONSTANTY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/17/2024 |
| KIM, SUE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/09/2024 |
| KRESHCHUK, IGOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/29/2024 |
| MCCORMACK, BRENNAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/06/2023 |
| PARHAM, RENEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/18/2024 |
| PICKETT, KATIYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/30/2024 |
| SINGH, HARMINDER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/19/2024 |
| SMITH, GREGORY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| WILLIAMS, SCHVONDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $387K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055956. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.