Capital Post Acute
6821 24th Street, Sacramento, CA 95822 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 121 certified beds · (916) 391-6011 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.08 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.76 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 76.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.3%CMS range 40.1–60.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 6.0–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 76.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 65.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 5.1–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 117.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
71 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) received treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice when:1a. Resident 1's Midodrine (medication to increase blood pressure) order for orthostatic hypotension (a sudden significant drop in the blood pressure after standing up from a sitting or lying position causing symptoms like dizziness or lightheadedness) was not consistently followed; and, 1b. Resident 1's Midodrine PRN (given as needed or requested) order was not clarified and carried out as ordered.These failures increased the potential for Resident 1 to experience dizziness and lightheadedness and potentially increase incidents for falls due to low blood pressure. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility March 2026 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (altered brain function caused by chemical imbalance, epilepsy (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause jerking movements, blank stares, and loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when pests were noted inside the rooms of two of three sample residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2).This failure had the potential to jeopardize the residents' living conditions, their health and safety. A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with a diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare.A review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set- an assessment tool) dated 2/5/26 indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact.During an observation and interview on 4/29/26 at 11:08 a.m. with Resident 1 in Resident 1's room, a live roach was observed on the floor and a live brown spider 1 inch in length was observed on the sliding door in the resident room. Two (2) roaches were observed on a trap under Resident 1's bed and two 1-inch black spiders and a roach were observed under a wooden cabinet on a trap in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 became angry and stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention practices for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a licensed nurse did not perform hand hygiene during wound care between changing gloves. This failure increased the potential to contaminate Resident 1's wound. A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in February 2026 with a diagnosis of aftercare following joint replacement surgery. A review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum data set- an assessment tool) dated 2/16/26, indicated Resident had moderate cognitive impairment.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/26/26 at 10:37 a.m. in Resident 1's room with Licensed Nurse (LN 1), Resident 1 was observed lying supine in bed with steri-strips to the left thigh. LN 1 was observed placing wound care supplies directly on Resident 1's bed without separation of the clean and dirty area. LN 1 was observed not performing hand hygiene between changing gloves at 10:37 a.m., 10:39 a.m., and 10:41 a.m. LN 1 confirmed that she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — patternProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nine residents (Resident 32, Resident 17, Resident 59, Resident 84, Resident 94, Resident 122, Resident 71, Resident 36 and Resident 126) out of 32 sampled residents were free from involuntary seclusion when resident room doors were left closed.This failure had the potential to increase the risk of psychosocial trauma and physical injury when residents were unable to exit their rooms independently or access staff during an emergency. Findings:A review of Resident 32's admission Record (AR) indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses which included difficulty speaking and dementia (a progressive decline in memory, language and cognitive function severe enough to disrupt daily life).A review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 11/18/25 indicated Resident 32's had a moderate memory problems.A review of Resident 17's AR indicated the resident was initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident 139, Resident 96, Resident 116 and Resident 126) of 32 sampled residents were free of medication administration error rates of five percent or more, when 10 errors out of 28 opportunities for errors occurred during the medication administration to the residents.These failures resulted in medication administration error rates of five percent or more, which was 35.71 %. Findings:1. During a medication administration observation on 2/18/26 at 8:08 a.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 5, LN 5 was observed preparing four medications for Resident 139.During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/18/26 at 8:42 a.m., with LN 5, Resident 139's medical record was reviewed. The medical record indicated a physician's order dated 2/15/26 for sucralfate (a medication used to treat and prevent active duodenal [upper small intestine] ulcers) 1 gm (gram, a unit of measurement/strength of medication) .give 1 gm by mouth four times a day, give on an empty stomach, which was scheduled for 7 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 116 out of 116 residents when: 1.Several metal sheet pans, serving utensils and scoop in clean and ready-to-use storage areas:Were stacked wet while stored awayThere was food debris in scoop and metal strainer [NAME] substance inside of the utensil holder.2.There were bags of food items in the walk-in freezer with issues:1 bag of unopened cream puffs, and two unopened bags of chopped green chilies have freezer burnsWalk in freezer had dark brown substances, white particles and an unknown plastic blue container at the back corner of the freezer floor.These failures had potential to cause food-borne illnesses in a highly susceptible population of 116 out of 116 residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/17/26 at 8:44 a.m., at the kitchen's initial tour with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), several metal sheet pans stored at the clean and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 116 when:1. Resident 54's nebulizer mask (a medical accessory that fits over a patient's nose and mouth to deliver medication directly into the lungs) had been sitting outside of the antimicrobial bag exposed for an unknown time; and,2. Staff did not follow enhance barrier precaution and did not perform hand hygiene when providing care for residents in Rooms 403, 404, 405 and 407. Findings:1.During a review of Resident 54's clinical record, indicated Resident 54 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and acute and chronic respiratory failure (occurs when not enough oxygen transfers from the lungs to the blood, or when the lungs can't properly remove carbon dioxide from the blood).A review of Resident 54's active physician order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse from one out of five sampled residents (Resident 89) when Resident 61 slapped Resident 89's right hand.This failure resulted in Resident 89 not being free from abuse by Resident 61, and Resident 89's right to be free from abuse not protected.Findings:During a review of Resident 89's admission Record (AR), indicated, Resident 89 was initially admitted [DATE] with diagnosis including Orthopedics (a medical and surgical specialty focused on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of muscles, joints, and bones disorders) Aftercare following Surgical amputation (amputation-a surgical removal of all or part of a limb or extremity to treat severe infection, disease such as diabetes [Diabetes Mellitus -a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing]).During a review of Resident 89's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving elopement was reported to the State agency within the required time frames. The facility failed to report the elopement of one out of 32 sampled resident (Resident 138) whose whereabouts were unknown on 11/19/25.This failure of timely reporting had the potential to cause a delayed response by enforcement agencies to ensure residents' safety.Findings:During a closed record review on 2/20/26, the admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 138 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute Pyelonephritis (a serious bacterial infection of the kidney, usually caused by a bladder infection that has spread upwards). Resident 138's clinical record indicated, a history of Diabetes Type 1 (DM 1- a chronic autoimmune condition where the body's immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys insulin-producing cells in the pancreas), Bacteremia (the presence of bacteria in the blood stream), Bipolar Disorder (a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of 32 sampled residents (Resident 38 and Resident 41) received assistance with their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs-normal daily functions required to meet basic needs) when Resident 41 and Resident 38 had long facial hair and long fingernails with blackish substance underneath.This failure had the potential to negatively affect their self-esteem, comfort, and personal hygiene.Findings:During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 41 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease (damage to the heart caused by long term unmanaged high blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness and depression (persistent, intense, and long-lasting feeling of sadness or a loss of interest in activities).During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 61 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to provide for two residents (Resident 138 and Resident 139) out of 32 sampled residents:Adequate supervision when Resident 138 eloped the facility without staff being aware of Resident 138's whereabouts; and,No smoking assessment completed for Resident 139.These failures placed residents at risk for serious injury, harm, or death related to elopement and fire hazards.Findings: 1.During a closed record review on 2/20/26, the admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 138 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute Pyelonephritis (a serious bacterial infection of the kidney, usually caused by a bladder infection that has spread upwards). Resident 138's medical record indicated, a history of Diabetes Type 1 (DM 1- a chronic autoimmune condition where the body's immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys insulin-producing cells in the pancreas), Bacteremia (the presence of bacteria in the blood stream), Bipolar Disorder (a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medication for one (Resident 139) out of 32 sampled residents.This failure resulted in the facility's inability to monitor Resident 139's medication administration, placing Resident 139 at risk for improper dosing and non-therapeutic medication levels.Findings:Review of Resident 139's admission Records, indicated that Resident 139 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a condition characterized by persistent worry and interferes with daily life), panic disorder (a condition that is characterized by unexpected panic attacks) and depression (a condition that causes persistent sadness that affects how a person feels, thinks and functions in daily life).Review of Resident 139's clinical record indicated no Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-a group of healthcare professionals who collaborate assess and plan a resident's care) notes, no order and no care plan indicating Resident 139 was able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food preference was honored for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 5) when Resident 5's request for a diet upgrade was not followed.This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' food intake and well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 5 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included injury of cervical spinal cord (uppermost part of the spinal cord), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and adjustment disorder with depressed mood (persistent, intense, and long-lasting feeling of sadness or a loss of interest in activities).During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/5/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 5 did not have any memory or cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident 5 did not have any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and care services was provided for one (Resident 118) of 32 sampled residents in accordance with professional standards of practice when rehabilitation referral for restorative nursing (RNA) was not started right away for Resident 118.This failure had the potential to place Resident 118 at risk for decline in functional ability, including decreased mobility and muscle strength.Findings:During a review of Resident 118's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Reisdent 118 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (MS- a chronic, progressive disease involving damage to the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord), paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs) and muscle wasting/atrophy (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle).During a review of Resident 118's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/22/25, the MDS indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident 105) out of 32 sampled residents, call light was accessible to call for staff assistance, when call light was out of reach. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 105's inability to notify staff if there was an emergency. Findings:A review of Resident 105's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with diagnoses which included subarachnoid hemorrhage (where bleeding occurs between the brain and surrounding tissues) and dysarthria (difficulty speaking).A review of Resident 105's Care Plan (CP, a comprehensive, individualized plan of care) indicated the following concerns and interventions:1. The resident is at risk for alteration in musculoskeletal status: . Be sure call light is within reach and respond promptly to all requests for assistance, dated 4/8/25. 2. At risk for skin breakdown: Keep call light within reach and encourage resident to call for assistance, dated 3/29/25. 3. Resident is at risk for falls and/or injuries: Keep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility failed to identify, implement and monitor new interventions to prevent falls after Resident 1 fell at the facility on 1/4/26 and fell twice more on 1/10/26.These failures could have contributed to a fall on 1/13/26 that resulted in a broken clavicle (a break in the outer end of the collarbone, often caused by a direct fall onto the shoulder causing intense pain), pain, and a four-day hospitalization for Resident 1. Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medical diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), and seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness).During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of five sampled residents from abuse (Resident 1) when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) hit Resident 1 on the head and the CNA, along with Witness 1 and Witness 2, physically restrained Resident 1 during care.This failure resulted in violation of Resident 1's right to be free from abuse of any type and had the potential to result in physical and psychosocial harm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission record, Resident 1 was admitted in February of 2025 with diagnoses of Traumatic Hemorrhage of Cerebrum (bleeding within the brain tissue), Dementia (disorder affecting memory, thinking, language, and problem-solving) and muscle weakness. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment (a score of 11 out of 15 suggests the individual has noticeable issues with memory and orientation, requiring more support for daily living tasks). During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) was free from abuse when facility staff witnessed Resident 4 hit Resident 3 with an object.This failure resulted in Resident 3 to feel unsafe in the facility and had the potential for Resident 3 to be harmed.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's clinical record, Resident 3 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included bilateral below the knee amputation (surgical removal of the leg below the knee), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/26/24, Resident 3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated Resident 3 had intact cognitive.During a review of Resident 4's clinical record, Resident 4 was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was treated with respect and dignity for a census of 116. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not experience her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses which included spinal cord disease (conditions that affect the spinal cord, causing damage or deterioration) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, an anxiety disorder caused by very stressful, frightening or distressing events). A review of Resident 1 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool), dated 3/4/25, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 1 ' s Care Plan (CP, a document that outlines a person's specific care needs, medical history, and the interventions that will be used to address those needs), dated 3/5/25 indicated Resident 1 was dependent on facility staff for meeting her emotional, intellectual, physical and social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff did not wear a gown when providing high contact care to three residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP-set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO)] for a census of 116 These failures could lead to increased risk of infection spreading among residents. Findings 1. Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility in March 2025 with multiple medical diagnoses which included anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. During an observation on 4/22/25 at 1:21 p.m. outside of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish) to the State Survey Agency for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure placed the residents at risk for continued exposure to potential abuse. Findings: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (the body's inability to efficiently remove carbon dioxide from the blood), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), and difficulty in walking. Resident 4 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact. Resident 5 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure for a census of 118 when a medication/treatment cart was unlocked and unattended with prescription medications in it. This failure had the potential to expose residents, staff, and visitors to unauthorized access to medications resulting in possible injury or drug diversion. Findings: During an observation on 2/4/25 at 10:19 a.m. in the facility front lobby, the treatment cart was observed to be up against the wall, unattended and unlocked. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 10:26 a.m. with the license Nurse (LN) 1, the LN 1 confirmed the treatment cart with prescription medications was unlocked. The LN stated, The cart should always be locked when not in use. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 12:15 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, I would expect all medication and treatment carts with prescribed medications to be locked when unattended for safety. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Storage dated 3/1/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage, handling, labeling, and delivery of respiratory care and equipment consistent with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) for three out of 25 sampled residents (Resident 105, Resident 23, and Resident 88) when: 1. Resident 105's nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) mask and tubing set was left on top of the bedside drawer, uncovered after use and was not changed after 72 hours; 2. Resident 23's nebulizer mask and tubing set was left on top of the bedside drawer, uncovered after use; and, 3. Resident 88's physician's order for oxygen therapy was not followed, and Resident 88's nasal cannula (a medical device with two prongs that is connected to an oxygen source used to deliver supplemental oxygen directly into the nostrils) and humidifier bottle (a device prefilled with water that adds moisture to oxygen to make it more comfortable and effective to breathe) were not labeled with the date it was first used. These failures had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
6. A review of Resident 63's clinical record indicated Resident 63 was admitted June of 2022 and had diagnoses that included hepatic failure (occurs when the liver is unable to perform its normal functions), chronic pain, diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition causing too much sugar in the blood that can affect nerves), and neuropathy (a nerve condition that can cause pain, numbness, tingling, or weakness in the body). A review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive Patterns, dated 10/23/24, indicated Resident 63 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident 63 had an intact cognition. A review of Resident 63's MDS Health Conditions, dated 10/23/24, indicated Resident 83 had experienced pain occasionally and had received scheduled and as needed pain medication regimen, and non-medication intervention for pain. A review of Resident 63's physician's order, dated 10/27/24, indicated, oxyCODONE HCl [a controlled pain medication] Oral Tablet 10 MG [milligrams-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dishes and utensils were cleaned in a sanitary condition for a census 112. This had the potential for foodborne illnesses. Findings: During an interview on 11/6/24 at 11:18 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) she confirmed the facility had a low temperature dishwasher. During a concurrent kitchen observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 2:09 p.m. the facility's dishwasher had a yellow sign on it indicating it was Low Temperature Dishwasher. The Dietary Aide (DA) 1 was asked to check the dishwasher's sanitizing solution. DA 1 proceeded to take one of the chlorine test strips and dipped in the water of the final rinse cycle. The strip came back less than 10 parts per million (ppm). The DM re-checked chemical strip again less than 10 ppm. The DM confirmed the chemical strip was to be dark color in purple indicating 50 ppm. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/6/24 at 2:14 p.m. with DA 1, the facility's document titled, Dish Machine Temperature Log (Low Temp Machine) for October and November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 112 when; 1. A shared glucometer (a device which measures blood sugar using blood from the fingertip) was not cleaned and sanitized properly after use and before storage; 2. A clean residents' personal items delivery cart was found with a thick layer of dust on its tray; 3. Shared glucometers (a device used to measure blood sugar) were not cleaned and sanitized based on manufacturer instruction when used for Resident 109 and Resident 315. 4. The facility did not follow safe infection prevention practices when care provided to Resident 82 with tube feeding and medication administration, in a room marked as Enhanced Barrier Precaution (or EBP, staff to use gown and gloves as protection to prevent spread of bugs or infections) These failures resulted in an increased risk for cross-contamination (movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another), potential exposure of Resident 92,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident's right to privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records for one resident out of a census of 112 residents when a computer screen that showed a resident's photo and confidential personal and medical information was left unsecured and unattended. These failures had the potential to result in unauthorized access of residents' personal and medical information. Findings: During an observation on 11/4/24 at 1:50 p.m. near nurse's station 1, 2, & 3, next to the facility lobby, a computer on top of a treatment cart had a screen showing a resident's photo, complete name, medical record number, current room and bed number, gender, date of birth , age, attending physician, and other pertinent personal and medical information. It was left unattended facing the facility lobby. Four residents and three facility staff were observed passing by the treatment cart. Multiple staff were in the facility lobby. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/4/24 at 1:50 p.m. near nurse's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 70) when a hole was observed in the wall of Resident 70's room. This failure created a non-homelike environment for Resident 70. Findings: Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses that included a stroke (damage to the brain from an interruption of its blood supply), hemiplegia (the inability to move one side of the body), and aphasia (a condition affecting the ability to express language). A review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to guide care) Cognitive (having full understanding) Patterns, dated 9/27/24, indicated Resident 70 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (a tool to assess a persons' full understanding) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated Resident 70 was cognitively intact. During an observation on 11/4/24 at 10:17 a.m., Resident 70's room had a six inch by 12 inch hole in the drywall with exposed plumbing approximately two feet above the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 112). This deficient practice had the potential for inaccurate care. Findings: Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-lung disease). Review of Resident 112's MDS (Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool), dated 9/7/24 under section A0310 Type of Assessment-Continued indicated unplanned discharge. Under section A2105 Discharge Status indicated Resident 112 went to 04. Short-Term General Hospital (acute hospital .). During a review of Resident 112's Progress Note dated 9/7/24 at 10:54 a.m., indicated Res (resident) decided that he wanted to go home against medical advice (AMA) today. Risk and benefits explained to the res but still doesn't want to stay and verbalized i…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one out of 25 sampled residents (Resident 105) when Resident 105's respiratory care and nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) treatment care plan was not developed. This failure placed Resident 105 at risk to not meet his medical needs and to not achieve the highest practicable well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 105's clinical record indicated Resident 105 was admitted October of 2024 and had diagnoses that included parkinsonism (a clinical syndrome characterized by tremor, slowed movement, rigidity, and postural instability), asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrow, and swell, and produce extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe), dementia (impairment of the ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with everyday activities), and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe Quality Control (or QC, proactive testing and calibration for accuracy of devices) and resident care practices with resident census of 112 based on standards of practice and facility's policy when: 1. The facility did not perform Quality Control (testing and calibration for accuracy) for glucometer (a machine that measures the blood sugar level) devices consistently based on facility's policy and the manufacturer recommendations. 2. Nursing care did not follow orders for checking feeding tube (surgically inserted tube into the stomach for feeding or medication administration when oral route not available) residuals (practice of checking volume of residue in the tube connected to stomach; this helped with reduced risk of aspiration [when stomach contents get into lung]) and keeping head elevated when medication was given to Resident 82 via feeding tube. These failed practices could contribute to unsafe care of diabetes resident with blood sugar monitoring and risk of complications from tube feeding.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based an observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 25 sampled residents (Resident 29) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and facility's policy and procedure (P&P) when Resident 29's physician's order for G-Tube Insertion Site (Gastronomy tube-a tube used to provide nutrition and medications) treatment was not followed. This failure had the potential for Resident 29's G-tube insertion site to become infected and for Resident 29 to not achieve their highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and as having a G-Tube. During a review a Resident 29's physician orders contained an order dated 5/10/24 for Enteral - Cleanse G Tube Insertion Site QD (every day) with NSS (normal sterile saline), pat dry, cover with gauze or abdominal pad. Monitor and report to MD if s.s. (signs & symptoms) of worsening. every day shift.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure injury/ulcer (PI/PU, injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure) care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice and facility's policy and procedures (P&P) for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 89) when Resident 89's newly applied pressure ulcer dressing was not initialed and dated. This failure has the potential for Resident 89's stage 4 PU (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) to not get ordered care and treatment, to get worse, and/or develop complications, and for Resident 89 to not achieve the highest practicable well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 89's clinical record indicated Resident 89 was admitted March of 2023 and had diagnoses that included stage 4 PU of sacral region (lower back near the crease of the buttocks), severe malnutrition, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident 89's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for care of a feeding tube (a tube placed in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to deliver nutrition and calories (enteral nutrition) to your body if you can't safely chew or swallow), when a water flush (water given to hydrate patients via enteral feeding tube) volume and frequency received by Resident 107 was not consistent with the physician's order for one (Resident 107) of 25 sampled residents. This deficient practice placed Resident 107 in danger of receiving incorrect amounts of water flushes and may have resulted in depleted nutrition. Findings: A review of Resident 107's admission Record, indicated, Resident 107 was admitted in the facility in October 2024 and had diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes (high blood sugar), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and the need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident 107's Brief Interview for Mental Status, Section C, (BIMS, cognitive screening test), indicated, Resident 107 was unable to complete the interview. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 94's medically related social services needs were met when, Social Services Assistants (SSA) did not clarify his surgery with his primary physician for one of 25 sampled residents, Resident 94. This failure had the potential to cause delay in Resident 94's healing and recovery. Findings: During a review of Resident 94's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 94 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), and dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing) following cerebral infarction and depression. During a review of Resident 94's summary score for Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, cognitive screening test) was 12 out of 15 which indicated Resident 94 had moderately impaired cognitive function. During an interview with Resident 94 on 11/4/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 94 stated, together with her husband, she had an appointment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices when medication error rate was more than 5% (% or percentage- number or ratio that expressed as a fraction of 100) with Resident census of 112. Medication administration observations were conducted over multiple days, at varied times, in random locations throughout the facility. The facility had a total of three errors out of 37 opportunities which resulted in a facility wide medication error rate of 8.11 % in two out of 10 residents (Resident 69 and Resident 105) observed for medication administration. These failures may result in unsafe medication use, medication error, and use of spoiled or ineffective drugs. Findings: During a medication administration observation, in facility's Units 1-2, accompanied by Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), on 11/4/24, at 9:38 a.m., LN 3 administered a total of seven medications to Resident 105. LN 3 pulled a unit of liquid inhalation medication called DuoNeb (a combination product with albuterol-ipratropium used to treat shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices were maintained in the medication room and medication carts with the census of 112 when: 1. The Back Station medication room stored expired, unlabeled, and undated medications. 2. Medication Cart #2 found a pill in the pill cutter, and Pro-Stat AWC had yellow/orange streaks running down the bottle. 3. Hazardous medications (drugs that can cause harm to the body when handled unsafely) were stored in medication Carts # 1 and Cart #4 with no warning label on how to be handled by nursing staff. 4. Inhalation products called Ipratropium Bromide and Albuterol Sulfate (or DuoNeb, a breathing treatment) stored in medication Cart #1 and Cart #4 were not dated, and/or the beyond use date was not followed. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being and the use of spoiled or expired medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and inspection on, 11/4/24 at 10:27 a.m., at the Back Station medication room, accompanied by Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of Resident 100's diagnosis in the medical records in one out of five residents. This failure of inaccurate documentation of resident's diagnosis may contribute to unsafe care and treatment by the facility and subsequent care providers. Findings: During a concurrent interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 11/7/24, at 11:31 AM, and record review of Resident 100's medical record, titled Discharge Summary, dated 9/30/24, the record indicated Resident 100 had history of dementia (loss of memory) along with other medical diagnoses for heart disease and bedsore infection. The record indicated Resident 100 was ordered olanzapine (or Zyprexa, a mind-altering drug) 2.5 mg (mg is milligram, a unit of measure) at bedtime on discharge from hospital which was a reduced from 7.5 mg previous dosage. ADON acknowledged the indication for use of olanzapine was dementia related behavior. During a concurrent interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 11/7/24, at 11:31 AM, and record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) of two sampled residents' right to be free from verbal and physical abuse when Resident 1 yelled racial slurs and Resident 2 slapped Resident 1 in the face. This deficient practice resulted in both residents feeling either discontent, pain, and concerns about safety. Findings: The following documents were reviewed in Resident 1's medical record: - An admission record, printed on 10/10/24, indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility in summer of 2024 with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The admission record also indicated Resident 1 was under conservatorship (had an appointed conservator to make personal decisions). - A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 9/20/24, indicated a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored locked for a census of 119 when two bags of medications were left unlocked and unattended on top of a cabinet. These failures had the potential for medication misuse and drug diversion. Findings: During an observation on 8/6/24 at 9:58 a.m. in the Director of Nursing's (DON) office, there were two bags with approximately 30-40 bottles and boxes of medications on top of the black cabinet that was left unlocked. The door was open and unlocked. The DON was not in the room, and there was a female staff entering the DON's office. There were other staff members walking outside of the hallway. There was a resident's room that consisted of three residents positioned in front of the DON's office. During an interview on 8/6/24 at 10:14 a.m. with the DON, the DON confirmed expecting the medications to be locked in a locked compartment or a locked room without resident access. The DON stated residents or staff could have taken and ingested the expired medications. A review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the professional standards of practice for Resident 1 when the nasal cannula (a device used to deliver oxygen to the nose) was not labeled with an open date (start of use) and the nasal cannula replacement order was scheduled for a longer interval than indicated on the facility's policy. These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread of infection. Findings: Resident 1 was most recently admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses which included cirrhosis of the liver (a chronic liver damage from a variety of causes leading to scarring and liver failure), diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), and chronic respiratory failure (a condition when blood has too much carbon dioxide or not enough oxygen). A review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated April 2024, indicated the following orders: Order initiated on 6/6/23 indicated, Change Oxygen tubing monthly every night shift every 28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of allegation of abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) as required by the regulations. This failure resulted in a delay in the abuse investigation process and decreased the facility's potential to protect residents from physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 4/4/24 indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility over two years ago with multiple diagnoses which included hemiplegia ( paralysis of half of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it). The admission record also indicated Resident 1 was non-English speaking. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 3/14/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1's change in condition (CIC) notes, dated 3/16/24, the notes indicated, On 3/16/2024 at around 8:00 AM, resident reported to RNA [Restorative Nursing Assistant] that he was hit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide supervision and monitoring for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1, after several attempts, eloped from the facility. This failure had the potential to result in serious injury or death for Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side, intracranial injury (brain injury) without loss of consciousness, mild cognitive impairment, right knee pain, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident 1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool), dated 6/4/13 documented Resident 1 as having unclear speech, usually able to understand others, usually able to make self-understood and his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score as an 8 (moderate impairment). The MDS described Resident 1 as having no delirium or behavioral symptoms. The MDS also described Resident 1 as needing limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1's) representative obtained a copy of Resident 1's record or any portions thereof upon request and of two working days advance notice to the facility. This failure resulted in the impingement of Resident 1's representative rights. Findings: Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (neurological disorders) and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body). During an interview on 3/22/24 at 9:11 a.m., with the Administrator, he confirmed he received the request for Resident 1's medical records, from the complainant, on 3/14/24 and sent the request to legal on 3/14/24. The Administrator confirmed Medical Records had all requested documents copied and ready to go on 3/14/24. The Administrator stated he received an email from legal, on 3/15/24, not to send anything until further notice. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to observe professional standards of practice to meet the needs of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility failed to carry out physician's order for management of shortness of breath as ordered upon discharge from a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). This failure resulted in worsening of Resident 1's shortness of breath and subsequent need to be transferred to a hospital. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident in 2021 with multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). Resident 1's medical history indicated that he had multiple hospitalizations while living in the facility. A review of Resident 1's Physician's Order dated 6/29/2021 indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 3/1/24 indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had no memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) on notification of changes for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's family member was not notified of Resident 1's change of condition and transfer to the hospital. This failure resulted in Resident 1's family member to be unaware and not involved with Resident 1's current medical status and transfer to the hospital. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE], and had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture), convulsions (an involuntary action of jerking and contractions), hemiplegia (complete loss of the ability to move one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (damage to a part in the brain due to a disrupted blood flow) affecting right dominant side. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of bed-hold was provided for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) or their representatives. These failures caused residents or their representatives to not be fully informed of bed-hold options and rights. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breath), tracheostomy status (an opening created into the windpipe from outside the neck to help air and oxygen reach the lungs), and unspecified dementia (decline in cognitive ability). Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive screening) dated 11/27/23 indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment with a score of 9. Further review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated a 'Transfer Form' dated 1/8/2024. Resident 1's reason for transfer was due to respiratory arrest (respiratory failure). A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when there was no care plan, no wound assessment, and no monitoring for Resident 1's left middle toe wound. These failures contributed to Resident 1 being admitted to the hospital with osteomyelitis (serious infection of the bone from injuries that cause damage to deep tissues) and gangrene (tissue death often caused by lack of blood flow or infection) on his left second and third toes and, as a result; both toes were amputated. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted in 2023 with multiple diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes (body's inability to regulate blood sugar) and peripheral vascular disease (a common condition in which narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to the arms or legs). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 11/17/23 indicated, Resident 1 was cognitively intact. His skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services were provided to promote healing and prevent further progression of wounds for 2 residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), for a census of 116, when: 1. Resident 1's open area on the coccyx (tailbone) and surgical wound on the posterior spine (backbone) were not assessed weekly; and 2. Resident 2 was not provided with a low air loss mattress (LAL, designed to distribute the body weight and help prevent skin breakdown) and heel suspension boots (removes pressure from the heel). These failures increased the risk for Resident 1 and Resident 2 to develop new pressure ulcers and the deterioration of existing wounds. Findings: 1. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including fusion (connects two or more bones) of the spine, thoracolumbar region (parts of the spine supporting the chest and lower back, and the nerves which receives and sends messages between the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement acceptable standards of practice in the use of controlled medications when Resident 1's unused narcotic was taped back into the peeled blister pack and Resident 2's discontinued narcotics were stored in the medication cart for available for use and, had a reconciliation discrepancy. These failures increased the potential for controlled medication diversion, loss, and medication errors for a census of 119. Findings: Resident 1 was a long term resident in the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified pain. During a controlled medication reconciliation conducted on 1/11/24 at 11:29 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 1) , LN 1 verified Resident 1's Norco 5/325 mg (a narcotic pain medication, Hydrocodone 5 milligram per 325 mg of Acetaminophen) blister pack was torn open in the back and resealed with clear plastic tape with a pill in it. LN 1 indicated when the narcotic was taken from the blister pack and unused, LNs were to discard the unused narcotic in the presence of another LN instead of taping…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement its policy and protocols on abuse for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), when: 1. The facility failed to provide a nursing assessment immediately after Resident 1 alleged he had been physically abused by a staff member, and 2. The facility failed to immediately place a staff member, who was accused of physically abusing a resident, on leave. These failures resulted in Resident 1 not receiving an immediate assessment and interventions to ensure safety. Findings: 1. In an interview on 1/9/24 at 11:27 a.m., the Administrator in Training (AIT) acknowledged during the nocturnal shift (NOC shift, the overnight shift) on 1/1/24, Resident 1 was allegedly physically abused by a staff member and had alleged skin redness to one shoulder as a result of the physical abuse. In an interview on 1/9/24 at 12:47 p.m., Resident 3 stated he was Resident 1's roommate on 1/1/24, when Resident 1 alleged a nurse had pushed him. Resident 3 stated he observed a red mark on Resident 1's right arm. In an interview on 1/9/24 at 2:19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within two hours after facility staff were made aware of the allegation of abuse. This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect vulnerable residents and provide a safe environment. Findings: In an interview on 1/9/24 at 11:27 a.m., the Administrator in Training (AIT) stated on 1/1/24 at approximately 6:30 a.m., he received a phone call from Licensed Nurse 4 (LN 4) informing him Resident 1 had called the police earlier in the morning. The AIT stated he arrived at the facility, spoke to LN 4 before she left her shift around 7 a.m., and then spoke to Resident 1. AIT stated Resident 1 alleged LN 4 had pushed him during a verbal altercation which occurred earlier that morning. The AIT acknowleged he reported the allegation of physical abuse to CDPH via phone after the interview with Resident 1. In an interview on 1/10/24 at 7:26 a.m., LN 4 stated at approximately 2:40 a.m. on 1/1/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for a census of 121 residents when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not perform hand hygiene when entering and exiting multiple resident rooms before providing care to a resident during lunch. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread of infection among the residents. Findings: In an observation on 1/9/24 at 12:30 p.m. during lunch time, CNA 1 entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and exited the room with a lunch tray with used dishes, used utensils, and partially eaten food. CNA 1 put the used lunch tray on a tray cart and did not perform hand hygiene after holding the used lunch tray. CNA 1 immediately proceeded to enter and exit rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] without performing hand hygiene. CNA 1 then entered room [ROOM NUMBER], did not perform hand hygiene, and then began wiping food from Resident 6's face. In an interview on 1/9/24 at 12:36 p.m., CNA 1 stated in order to reduce risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 1's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP, a machine that pushes pressurized air into the lungs to help with breathing) treatment was not signed as given for 63 days, and 2. Resident 1's nasal cannula (used to deliver oxygen to patients who need supplemental oxygen) and humidifier (adds moisture to the oxygen) were not dated, her BiPAP mask and tubing were found uncovered on top of the oxygen concentrator (a machine that delivers oxygen) ; and a used nasal cannula was found on the bedside table. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 1 developing hypoxia (low oxygen) and infections. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission records indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in mid-2023 with multiple diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) failed to ensure the correct type and dose of insulin (a medication used to control blood sugar levels) was administered to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) for Resident 1. Findings: A review of the Skilled Nursing admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease involving inappropriately elevated blood glucose levels). During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/22/23 at 10 a.m., the DON stated on 10/6/23 at approximately 7:45 p.m., LN 1 administered 50 units of Lispro (a rapid acting insulin used to control blood sugar) instead of 50 units of Lantus (a long-acting insulin used to control blood sugar). LN 1 had discovered the error approximately 30 minutes later and notified the Physician. LN 1 was then instructed to monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with respect and dignity when the staff did not provide privacy during care. This failure decreased the potential to ensure Resident 1's right to privacy was maintained. Findings: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe) and tracheostomy status (a surgical procedure to create an opening into the trachea [windpipe] from outside the neck to help oxygen reach the lungs). During an observation on 11/14/23 starting at 10:30 a.m., Resident 1 was suctioned (removal of secretions to keep the windpipe clear) by the Respiratory Therapist (RT) through her tracheostomy with the privacy curtain open. In an interview on 11/14/23 at 10:35 a.m., the RT confirmed she did not close the privacy curtain prior to suctioning Resident 1. In an interview on 11/14/23 at 12:28 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services timely for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) when prescription medications were not available for administration. This failure resulted in Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 to not receive their routine medications as prescribed and placed the residents at risk for adverse consequences. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rate which could lead to blood clots), lung problems and high blood pressure. Review of Resident 1's clinical record included physician orders, dated 9/2/23, for apixaban (a blood thinner to prevent forming blood clots), to administer 5 mg (milligram) twice a day for the irregular heart rate and for bumetanide (a diuretic, a water pill to treat fluid retention and high blood pressure) to administer 1 mg once a day for heart problems. Review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) attained the highest mental and psychosocial well-being when the residents were concerned about their medication supplies after they missed their routine medications due to medication delivery delays. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to start keeping her own medication administration log to remind staff to reorder her medications timely and Resident 2 was more depressed and experienced uncontrolled pain, high stress, and anxiety. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rate that could lead to blood clots), lung problems and high blood pressure. In a concurrent observation and interview on 10/5/23 at 11:15 a.m., Resident 1 was in the bed in her three shared bedroom. Resident 1 reported she did not receive her blood thinner and heart medications because the facility ran out of the medications. The resident stated she worried about the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident's right to privacy of personal and medical records when residents' meal tickets were discarded in the facility kitchen garbage bin for the 98 residents who ate facility prepared meals. This failure had the potential for unauthorized access of residents' personal and medical records. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 9:40 a.m. with Dietary Aide (DA) 1 in the dishwashing area, DA 1 was observed throwing uneaten food, used napkins, and residents' meal tickets left on the meal trays into the garbage bin. DA 1 confirmed the observation. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 9:42 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the dishwashing area, the DSS confirmed that DA 1 threw the residents' meal tickets into the garbage bin. The DSS also confirmed that multiple residents' meal tickets were returned with their meal trays to the kitchen. During an observation on 9/12/23 at 9:22 a.m. with DA 3 in the dishwashing area, DA 3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired biological supplies found in Station 1 and 2 Medication Rooms (MR) were not available for use, and failed to ensure proper labeling of drug when, 1. Resident 47's oxycodone (an opioid, controlled medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) had no change in order label on the bubble pack; and 2. Expired medical supplies in the medication rooms were not removed and discarded, for a census of 111 residents. These failures placed Resident 47 at risk for receiving more than the prescribed dose of the opioid medication and had the potential for the expired biological supplies to be used for residents, compromising the accurate findings of their laboratory results, and may have subsequently led to misdiagnosis or prescribing wrong medications and treatments. Findings: 1. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident 47 had diagnoses that included chronic pain and long-term use of opiate analgesic. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve residents' therapeutic diet (a diet ordered as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, or to eliminate, decrease, increase, or provide specific nutrients in the diet) as prescribed by the physician when the prescribed controlled carbohydrate diet (CCHO- a diet focused on having the same amount of carbohydrates; fiber, starches and sugars, every day) for 14 out of 32 residents (Resident 81, Resident 78, Resident 33, Resident 52, Resident 10, Resident 121, Resident 171, Resident 114, Resident 97, Resident 107, Resident 570, Resident 122, Resident 44, and Resident 76) were not followed. This failure has the potential for Resident 81, Resident 78, Resident 33, Resident 52, Resident 10, Resident 121, Resident 171, Resident 114, Resident 97, Resident 107, Resident 570, Resident 122, Resident 44, and Resident 76 to experience fluctuating and/or uncontrolled blood sugar levels which may lead to serious medical complications. Findings: A review of Resident 81, Resident 78, Resident 33, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation, as well as maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 98 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. A package of ground sausage with ice crystals built-up was found open and exposed to air in the freezer; 2. Two out of two dry storage logs were not filled in four out of 11 entries; 3. A food preparation sink lacked an air gap (a backflow prevention device that prevents contaminated water from re-entering the sink); 4. Five large steam table pans, three medium steam table pans, one small steam table pan (with food particles), two water pitchers and covers, and two medium measuring containers were all found stored wet; 5. One baking soda container was found open to the air and past the used-by date, one spice was found with an unreadable use-by label, and two gravy mixes, a box of corn starch, and a seasoning salt were found opened and exposed to air; 6. A metal pipe was found chipped with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for the facility when two cockroaches were observed in the facility kitchen. This failure has the potential for contamination of resident's food, soilage of kitchen utensils and surfaces, and possible spread of disease or infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 9:01 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the kitchen, a 3/4 sized dead cockroach was found upside down in the food preparation sink. The DSS confirmed the observation. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 9:15 a.m. with the DSS in the kitchen, a 1/2 sized cockroach was seen running on the floor from the southern wall of the kitchen going under the steam table and kitchen counter holding hot water, coffee dispenser and cutting boards. The DSS confirmed the observation and stepped on the cockroach to kill it. During an interview on 9/14/23 at 10:25 a.m. with the DSS, the DSS stated It's not good to have them [cockroaches] in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure smoking safety for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 97) when the initial smoking assessment was delayed and the smoking care plan was inconsistent with the assessment. This failure placed the resident at risk for injuries related to smoking and had the potential for non-smoking residents to be exposed to smoking hazards. Findings: Review of Resident 97's medical records, admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility early 2023 with diagnoses that included mental issues and lung problems. Review of Resident 97's smoking assessment, Smoking Safety, completed on 6/20/23, indicated it was the initial smoking assessment since the resident's admission in January 2023. The assessment identified the resident was an independent smoker and recommended, Resident may smoke independently. Review of Resident 97's care plan for smoking, initiated on 6/20/23, indicated the resident's smoking goal was The resident will not smoke without supervision . as opposed to the smoking assessment specified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met when two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 170 and Resident 173) received medications without identifying irregularities of the indications for use. This failure had the increased potential for medication errors and placed the residents at risk for erroneous diagnoses and inaccurate medications. Findings: a. Review of Resident 170's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included lung problems and infection. The resident's admission Record indicated the resident had neither depression nor anxiety disorder in the DIAGNOSIS INFORMATION section. Review of Resident 170's Order Listing Report included a physician order, dated 9/7/23, for an anti-depressant medication, Fluoxetine 20 mg (milligram, a unit of measurement) 1 tablet by mouth once a day. The physician order prescribed the indication for use of Fluoxetine was for Anxiety M/B [manifested by]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to; 1. Identify signs and symptoms of opioid (a controlled medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) overdose (a life-threatening condition characterized by lessened alertness and small pupils) and to develop a care plan to accurately assess and monitor one of three sampled residents (Resident 47), and 2. failed to ensure Licensed Nurses (LN) provided quality of care in accordance with professional standards of practice for Resident 171 when: a. No comprehensive person-centered care plan with interventions that reflected his Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter, PICC (a thin, soft, long catheter inserted into the arm, neck, or leg's vein); b. No physician order about routine care and maintenance of PICC line; and c. LN 7 did not verify blood return (withdraw blood into the syringe) prior to use to confirm the location within the vein. These failures had the potential to affect the health and safety of Resident 171 and resulted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, Resident 44 failed to maintain his usual body weight, losing 38 pounds (lbs.) and 18% of his body weight since admission. This had the potential of leading to decreased independence due to muscle loss, as well as reduced ability to fight off infections. Findings: During the lunch meal rounds on 9/11/23 at approximately 1 p.m., Resident 44 was visited. While discussing his dislike of facility prepared meals, he reported that he had lost weight during his 2 years at the facility. He expressed anger and frustration by the continued weight loss. During a chart review of Resident 44 on 9/13/23 at 11:52 a.m., he was noted to have a diagnosis including failure to thrive, malnutrition, anemia, and a vitamin deficiency. His diet order included a controlled carbohydrate diet (used to control blood sugar levels) with a shake twice a day. Abbreviated Weight History as follows: 8/17/23=171lbs. (a loss of 38 lbs. or 18.2% of his body weight since admission). 7/23=not available…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with the facility policy for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 12) when oxygen tubing, oxygen mask for nebulizer (to administer liquid medicine into a mist through a mask to inhale the medication) treatment and the Bi-pap (the machine supplies pressurized air into the lungs) bag were outdated or not dated at all. These failures increased potential for respiratory infection for Resident 12 who already had compromised lung function. Findings: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in the Spring of 2023 with diagnoses that included lung disease and mental issues. In an observation on 9/11/23 at 8:45 a.m., Resident 12 was out of her room in a 4-bed shared room. Next to the resident's bed which was close to the door, the oxygen concentrator was observed in operation with the oxygen flow rate set at 4 liters/minute. The nasal cannula (a plastic tubing that delivers the oxygen from the concentrator to the nostrils) was connected to the concentrator and placed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) and failed to notify the physician immediately of Resident 1's change of condition (COC), when the resident complained of chest pain. In addition, the facility failed to assess Resident 1 and monitor him for his complaint of chest pain. These failures resulted in Resident 1's calling 911 due to the delay for needed medical attention and placed the resident at risk for harm when his condition was not evaluated. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident in 2022 with multiple diagnoses, including quadriplegia (loss of movement and sensation affecting resident's torso, upper and lower extremities and making him unable to move in a bed), heart failure (a condition when the heart is unable to pump enough blood for body's needs), and high blood pressure. A review of Resident 1's care plan titled, Resident has quadriplegia, dated 3/25/22, indicated resident's goal to remain free of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from neglect when Resident 1 did not receive incontinence care, was not turned and not repositioned for over five hours. This failure resulted in Resident 1's feeling uncomfortable, itching and had the potential to worsen his skin rash. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident in 2022 with multiple diagnoses, including quadriplegia (loss of movement and sensation affecting resident's torso, upper and lower extremities and making him unable to move in a bed), heart failure (a condition when the heart is unable to pump enough blood for body's needs), and high blood pressure. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 3/28/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was incontinent for bladder and bowel and was completely dependent on facility staff for ADLs, including bed mobility, toileting, personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staff to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents needs for census of 116, when Resident 2 had to wait for over an hour to be assisted with cleaning, multiple residents complained of extended wait time for assistance with their needs, and the facility failed to meet State staffing requirements for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) for 10 of 10 sampled days. These failures resulted in inadequate availability of CNAs to attend to Residents 2 and other residents requiring assistance needs, had the potential to place residents at risk for skin breakdown, and negatively affect residents' physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident in the beginning of this year with multiple diagnoses which included after stroke care, aphasia (difficulty with communication), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMM TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 06/01/2023 |
| SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 05/01/2022 |
| GASTWIRTH, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 25% | since 06/01/2023 |
| MCCORMACK, RYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 20% | since 06/01/2023 |
| O'SHEA, BRADY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 06/01/2023 |
| BRANDI, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| OAKWOOD HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| BEDRIN, CHRISTA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| DILLON, KA'LAI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/03/2025 |
| GONZALEZ LEDESMA, SERGIO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| GUERRERO, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/20/2024 |
| LAWRENCE, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| PERKINS, DANETT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2024 |
| SANTOS, ELENA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| SMITH, GREGORY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| THORNTON, NICOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/20/2023 |
| UBALDO, REMEDIOS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
| VERMEULEN, NADIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555442. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.