No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedarwood Post Acute

1090 Rio Lane, Sacramento, CA 95822 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 51 certified beds · (916) 446-2506 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (916) 446-2506 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5960 S Land Park Dr · (510) 768-8433 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4404 Del Rio Rd · (916) 452-2200 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
WESTIN Sacramento, 4800 Riverside Blvd
Park
950 Seamas Ave · (916) 808-5200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5700 S Land Park Dr · (916) 421-0492

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.9%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.7%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%11.2%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
83.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 83.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.5%CMS range 35.1–57.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.5–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge83.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge79.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.9%CMS range 5.3–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
37.5%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-17)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, handle, and prepare food in the facility kitchen in accordance with food standards when:Foods were not properly labeled with the use by or open dates;Proper hand hygiene was not followed by kitchen staff;Cold foods were not maintained at safe temperatures during food service and,Wet stainless steel pans were stacked before allowing to dry.These failures had the potential for residents to receive food outside the safe use by dates and for the spread of food borne illness in the kitchen to 42 residents receiving food from the kitchen service.1.During an observation on 6/14/26, at 8:08 a.m., in the kitchen freezer, frozen dessert puffs were in an open plastic bag with no open date or use by date.During an interview on 6/14/26, at 8:10 a.m, with Dietary Aid (DA 1), DA 1 stated he did not see a date on the frozen puff dessert, and it should have the date it was opened and a use by date on it.During an observation on 6/14/26, at 8:15 a.m., in the kitchen freezer, an opened bag of frozen peas was noted with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 41 and Resident 42) received treatment and services to prevent or minimize a decline in functional abilities when:1. The facility did not clarify Resident 41's physician order for Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA- nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) exercise program and did not communicate the physician order to RNA; and2. Resident 42's order for left hand splint did not include how many hours per day to be applied and it was not documented how long it was worn per day. These failures resulted in Resident 41 not receiving needed services for 8 months and had the potential to place the resident at risk for further functional decline and resulted in Resident 42's hand splint application to not be monitored for effectiveness or for any changes in application. 1. A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 41 in 2025 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent of greater when the medication error rate was 15.38 % for four medication errors out of 26 opportunities observed during a medication pass for four of seven residents (Resident 73, Resident 13, Resident 17, and Resident 8):1. Resident 73 was not given Omeprazole (medication to treat acid in the stomach) 30 minutes prior to meal, and2. Resident 8 was not given Omeprazole 30 minutes prior to meal, and3. Resident 17 was given Metoprolol (medication to treat high blood pressure) without checking blood pressure prior to administration, and4. Resident 13's Clopidogrel (medication that prevents clots) was not given on time.This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and had potential to adversely affect the residents' clinical conditions.1.During an observation of medication pass on 6/15/26 at 7:34 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN 3) was observed to prepare Resident 73's morning medications for administration. LN 3 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control precautions were followed for two of seventeen sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident 46) when: 1.Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control intervention to reduce transmission of [NAME]-drug resistant organisms, MDROs) were not followed for Resident 30 when enteral tube feeding formula (nutrition delivered directly into stomach) was administered without proper PPE (personal protective equipment- supplies such as gowns and gloves used to minimize exposure to infectious organisms), and 2. Contact Precautions (infection control measures used in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of diseases transmitted through direct or indirect contact, requiring gown and glove use before entering the room regardless of care or contact provided to resident) were not implemented timely for Resident 46 after his positive results for a wound infection were received by the facility. These failures increased the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote a dignified environment that maintained resident's dignity and privacy for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 79), when Resident 79's urinary catheter tubing and bag (tubing which allows urine to drain from the bladder into a collection bag) was not placed in a privacy bag and its contents exposed while the resident was ambulated through the hallway.This failure violated Resident 79's rights to privacy and had the potential to compromise the resident's dignity and self worth.A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 79 in the summer of 2026 following hospitalization for left knee joint infection.A review of Resident 79's physician's orders indicated an order dated 6/12/26 for foley catheter (a soft flexible tube inserted into a bladder to continuously drain urine) for wound management.During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/14/26 at 1:14 p.m., a urinary catheter bag was observed attached to Resident 79's bed frame. Resident 79 explained that she has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the skin condition section of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 41), when the MDS did not accurately reflect Resident 41's documented chronic neck wound and right lower extremity venous stasis ulcer (an open sore that develops because blood does not flow properly through the vein). This failure resulted in MDS assessment not accurately representing Resident 41's clinical condition and had the potential to affect care planning for the appropriate care needs. A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 41 in 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included chronic peripheral venous insufficiency (when the leg veins (blood vessels) did not work properly, making it difficult for blood to return to the heart from legs, causing increased vein pressure and venous ulcers).A review of Resident 41's annual MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents received adequate supervision to prevent fall accidents and residents' environment remained free of accident hazards for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 53 and Resident 76) when:The facility did not implement resident specific interventions to provide adequate supervision and safety for Resident 53 after the resident experienced fall with head contusion, and The facility failed to ensure Resident 76's (a non-verbal resident, dependent with care and unable to reposition self in bed or use call light) room was free from hazards when her call light string was observed on the back of her neck and pinned to her pillowcase.These failures resulted in Resident 53 experiencing another fall where she sustained cephalohematoma (blood-filled bump on the right side of her head), large skin tear on her right hand/wrist area, broken bone near the knuckle of the index finger to her right hand and had the potential for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 30) receiving enteral feeding (nutrition delivered directly into the stomach through a feeding tube) when Resident 30's head of bed was not elevated to 45 degrees at all times. This failure resulted in an increased risk of aspiration (when fluid, food, or gastric acid gets into the airways causing airway blockage or infection) for Resident 30. A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated Resident 30 was initially admitted to the facility in August 2022 with multiple diagnoses including Parkinsons (movement disorder of the nervous system), dementia (loss of memory, language, and thinking abilities), gastrostomy (G tube-surgical opening through the skin of the abdomen to the stomach to insert a tube in order to deliver nutrition directly into the stomach), pneumonia, respiratory failure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD-stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus). A review of Resident 30's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, goals and preferences for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 77), when Resident 77's oxygen tubing was not labeled.This failure had the potential for Resident 77 to be exposed to respiratory infectious agents from old or dirty tubing.During an observation on 6/14/26, at 9:15 a.m., in Resident 77's room, Resident 77 was receiving oxygen through a nasal cannula (thin plastic tubing that provides oxygen to the nose) with no label or date on the tubing.During an interview on 6/14/26, at 9:20 a.m., with Respiratory Therapist (RT), RT stated she did not see a date or label on Resident 77's tubing, and there should be one, so we know how old the tubing is (period it has been in use).During an interview on 6/17/26, at 10:58 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the oxygen tubing should be replaced every 7 days and labeled with the date. DON stated, they should chart in the residents medical record that they changed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain management that met professional standards of practice and residents plan of care for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 77 and Resident 80) when:1. Nursing staff did not reassess Resident 77 timely after administering a PRN (as needed) pain medication to check for effectiveness, and 2. The facility did not follow physician's order to assess Resident 80's pain using a pain scale. This failure resulted in the facility being unaware of the effectiveness of the PRN pain medication administered to Resident 77 and had the potential for Resident 77's and Resident 80's pain to not be adequately managed. 1. During a review of Resident 77's Diagnosis information dated 6/16/26 indicated, Resident 77 had the following diagnoses: prostate cancer, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis (painful joint disease where the protective cartilage on the ends of your bones gradually wears away) anxiety, fractured humerus (upper arm) with implant,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received their prescribed therapeutic diet (a meal plan prescribed by a physician and tailored by a registered dietitian) for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 39). When Resident 39 was served lunch with a salt packet, while on a no added salt diet during lunch mealtime. This failure had the potential for Resident 39's chronic medical conditions of high blood pressure and chronic kidney disease to worsen, causing negative health outcomes. During an observation on 6/14/26, at 12:30 p.m., in Resident 39's room, Resident 39 was eating her lunch while in bed, with her family member at bedside. A salt packet was noted on Resident 39's meal tray. Resident 39's meal tray ticket read NAS (No Added Salt).During an interview on 6/14/26, at 12:31 p.m., with Resident 39's family member, family stated, [Resident 39] is probably not supposed to have salt because she has high blood pressure.During an interview on 6/14/26, at 12:34 p.m., with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), outside of Resident 39's room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to monitor COVID-19 vaccination status of staff and education to staff related to benefits and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. This failure resulted in the facility not having accurate monitoring of the staff's COVID-19 vaccination status with the potential for infection to staff and residents. During an interview on 6/16/26 at 9:44 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 5), LN 5 stated she has received information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine and that it was offered yearly. During an interview on 6/16/26 at 11:23 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated he started as the IP at the facility in January 2026. The IP stated that COVID-19 vaccines are offered to the staff. Requested tracking or monitoring log for staff COVID-19 vaccination status and education. The IP stated the only tracking of staff vaccinations is currently in the personnel files. The IP stated the vaccination consents and declinations are in the personnel files. The IP stated if an employee reports to him that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe equipment for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 40), when Resident 40's bed control power cord was frayed with exposed wires. This failure placed Resident 40 at risk for injury. A review of Resident 40's admission Record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with multiple diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (change in how the brain works due to an underlying condition causing confusion or memory loss), dementia (loss of memory, language, and thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung condition that limits airflow into and out of the lungs), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 4/14/26, indicated Resident 40 had a long-term and short-term memory problem and his cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. During an observation on 6/14/26 at 8:49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool used in skilled nursing facilities) Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA, an MDS assessment done within 14 days after a resident has a significant change in their health status) was completed for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 developed a stage 3 pressure ulcer (tissue damage that results in full-thickness loss of skin and the layer of fat under the skin may be visible) and was not assessed.This failure had the potential to delay wound treatment, placing Resident 3 at risk for increased pain, infection, and a decline in functional status for the resident. Findings:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in March of 2026 with diagnoses that included a femur fracture.A review of Resident 3's document titled admission Assessment: Nursing - V2, dated 3/14/26, indicated that Resident 3 did not have a pressure ulcer at the time of the assessment.A review of Resident 3's document titled Wound Assessment Report, dated 5/14/26, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool used in skilled nursing facilities) assessments accurately reflected residents' current clinical status for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), when Resident 1's chest incisions were not coded on the MDS admission assessment and Resident 2's ongoing dialysis (a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from your blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning) treatment was not coded on a quarterly MDS assessment.These failures could have resulted in Resident 1 not receiving necessary wound care and Resident 2 missing or receiving poorly coordinated dialysis treatments.Findings:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May of 2025 with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic (buildup of fatty plaques made of cholesterol, fat, and other material inside the arteries) heart disease.During a review of Resident 1's admission MDS assessment section M (MDS section that assesses residents for skin conditions), dated 6/5/26, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food properly in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a census of 49 when: 1) Two metal bowls and 9 plate cover lids stored wet and stacked, 2) Two plastic cups had white film build up inside the cups, 3) Two thermometers missing inside freezers, 4) Open food items were not labeled with use by date, and, 5) Food items were not covered during resident food distribution of meal trays These failures increased the potential for food borne illness. Findings: 1.During a concurrent initial tour observation and interview on 6/10/25 at 8:20 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), nine plate cover lids and two small bowls were stored upright with water collected at the bottom of the bowl. The DM stated that the plate cover lids and bowls should be on a drying rack to air dry completely before storing. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 1:10 p.m. with the Registered Dietician (RD), RD stated lids and bowls should always be air dried and confirmed that if not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident needs were accommodated for seven out of 19 sampled Residents (Resident 13, Resident 47, Resident 152, Resident 19, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 10), when 1. The call light was not within reach for Resident 13, Resident 47, Resident 152 and Resident 19; 2. Resident 4 and Resident 5 did not have interventions regarding inability to use call lights in their care plans; and, 3. Resident 10 did not have a call light that accommodated his special needs These failures had the potential to result in the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, psychosocial and emotional well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 13's admission Record indicated Resident 13 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis (a condition which damaged skeletal muscle breaks down rapidly), muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait (a person's manner of walking) and mobility, and need for assistance with personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was below 5% or greater when the error rate was 25.81% based on eight medication errors out of 31 opportunities observed during a medication administration observation for four out of six residents (Resident 20, Resident 36, Resident 101, and Resident 25). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders or manufacturer's specifications and had the potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: 1.During a medication administration observation on 6/11/25 at 7:55 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, outside of Resident 20's room, LN 1 was observed preparing 6 medications for Resident 20, including chewable aspirin (ASA-medication for pain that can be used as prevention for heart disease) and omeprazole delayed-release tablet (medication used to treat excess stomach acid and help control heartburn). At 8:01 a.m., LN 1 went inside the room with a 5 oz (ounces-unit of measurement) cup of water to give the medications to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 49 residents when a shared blood pressure (BP) cuff was not cleaned and sanitized properly in between resident use. This failure resulted in increased risk for cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and may cause infections among residents. Findings: During an observation on 6/11/25 at 7:48 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 took the blood pressure (BP) of Resident 20 using a BP cuff from the medication cart without sanitizing it. LN 1 placed the BP cuff on Resident 20's right arm. After completing the task, LN 1 exited the room and placed the BP cuff in the medication cart without sanitizing it. At 8:04 a.m., LN 1 used the same BP cuff on Resident 36 without sanitizing it prior to use. LN 1 did not sanitize the BP cuff in between resident use before placing it back into the medication cart. During an observation on 6/11/25 at 8:51 a.m., LN 2 was observed taking the blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five residents out of a census of 49 (Resident 201, Resident 29, Resident 31, Resident 12, and Resident 44) were treated with dignity and respect when: 1) Resident 201's urinary catheter bag was not covered by a dignity bag; and, 2) RNA 1 and RNA 2 were standing up when assisting to feed Resident 29 and Resident 31; and, 3) Resident 12 and Resident 44 were not asked if they had a preference on using clothing protectors during their meals. These failures placed Resident 201, Resident 29, Resident 31, Resident 12 and Resident 44 at potential risk of diminished self-esteem and feelings of self-worth. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 201's admission Record, indicated Resident 201 was admitted [DATE] with a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (a condition characterized by altered brain function) and bacteremia (bloodstream infection). During a review of Resident 201's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two of 49 sampled residents (Resident 255 and Resident 10) reflecting the residents' current health status and needs when: 1. Resident 255 's care plan was not updated for self-administration of medications; and, 2. Resident 10's care plan was not updated for wound dressings on his hands. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 255 and Resident 10 receiving outdated and not person-centered care placing the residents at risk for not meeting their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 255's admission Record indicated, Resident 255 was admitted to the facility May 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included Sjögren's syndrome (a chronic autoimmune disease where the body's immune system mistakenly attacks moisture-producing glands, particularly those in the eyes and mouth). During a review of Resident 255's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan on wound care interventions for 2 of 6 sample residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4). This failure to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan on specific wound care needs had the potential for Resident 2 and Resident 4 to receive inaccurate and inadequate care. Findings: During record review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for Resident 2 dated 10/1/2024, indicated, Resident 2 had diabetic foot ulcer under (MDS) section M. During interview with Resident 2 on 11/20/2022 at 3:25 p.m., stated, had . wound to right foot, wound dressings changed every other day . A record review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated treatment order dated 11/19/2024 for Right Plantar Foot, Diabetic . During record review of Resident 2's electronic health record, there was no care plan for Resident 2 ' s diabetic foot ulcer and wound order treatment. During record review of Resident 4's clinical record, indicated a primary diagnosis of Infection following a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hemodialysis (HD- treatment that filters waste from the blood when kidneys are not working) services were provided per facility policy for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 missed four outpatient hemodialysis appointments due to lack of transportation services and the physician was not notified of missed HD appointments. This failure resulted in Resident 1 going to the hospital for potential fluid retention increasing the risk for respiratory decline. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility in September 2024 with multiple dagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke- disrupted blood flow to the brain causing brain tissue death), chronic obstructive pulmnary disease (lung disease that blocks airflow causing breathing difficulties), and end stage renal disease (kidneys stop functioning and no longer filter waste from the blood). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate indwelling catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) care and services for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not have physician order for indwelling catheter care nor a catheter change for several months after admission to the facility. This failure had the potential to contribute to Resident 1's development of a urinary tract infection (UTI, a clinically detectable condition associated with invasion by disease causing microorganisms of some part of the urinary tract). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's facesheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) dated 10/2/24, the facesheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty) without lower urinary tract symptoms, stage 4 sacral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assure professional standards of care were followed when: 1. Resident 15, 19, and 29's oxygen tubing (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube into your nose) and humidifiers (devices used to humidify supplemental oxygen) were not labeled, dated and changed. 2. Resident 11's physician order for 1:1 (one on one) feeding assistance with meals was not carried out as ordered. 3. Resident 28's physician order for a plate guard (an adaptive device that prevents food from accidentally being pushed off the plate while eating) with all meals was not carried out as ordered. 4. Resident 30's admission medications order for Budesonide inhaler medication to treat a respiratory condition of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) was not entered in the facility's Medication Administration Record and medication was not offered or administered to Resident 30 per physician's order. 5. Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) did not observe Resident 27 ingest his afternoon medication. 6. Resident 27's Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and kept confidential multiple residents medical records. This failure had the potential to exposed multiple residents health information by persons not involved in the residents care, for a facility census of 51. Findings: On 8/20/24 at 1:54 p.m. a large open cardboard box was found underneath one of the desk in the Physical Therapy Department (PTD). The open box was observed to contain multiple residents confidential health information records of residents receiving Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy (OT). The open and unsecured cardboard box was located near the doorway where other residents and visitors come and go outside to access the patio area. There was a potential for unauthorized access into the cardboard box and unauthorized persons not involved with patient care. During an additional observation of the Physical Therapy Department (PTD) there were no confidential records bins located in the PTD. The nearest accessible confidential records bin were 2 large bins observed located outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure accurate accountability and effective storage of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse or addiction) when random controlled medication audits of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Controlled Drug Record (CDR) for three residents (Residents 9, Resident 28, and Resident 296) did not reconcile to indicate they were given to the residents. 2. Implement a system to accurately document and secure emergency medications (E-Kit). These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for abuse or misuse of these medications, the potential for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed, and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions. Finding: 1. Resident 9 had a physician's order of oxycodone (a medication to treat moderate to severe pain) 5 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement) , one tablet by mouth every six hours if needed, ordered 8/16/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 12.82% error rate when five medication errors out of 39 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for three of six sampled Residents (Residents 9, 21, and 30). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. Findings: 1.During a medication observation on 8/20/24 at 8:30 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 was observed preparing 11 medications including losartan (a medication to treat high blood pressure) and B Complex with vitamin C for Resident 9. A review of Resident 9's medical record indicated the following physician's orders: - Losartan 25 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement): Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension with a meal/ food. Hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure, the maximum pressure in the heart when it pushes blood out to the body) is less than 110 or pulse is less than 60; 1 tablet by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 30) was free of a significant medication error when Resident 30 missed 25 doses of Brovana (generic name aformoterol tartrate, a medication to treat breathing problems) when nursing staff did not know to check for it in the medication storage room refrigerator. This deficient practice had the potential to result in breathing complications and worsening of Resident 30's clinical condition. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 8/20/24 at 9:10 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, LN 2 was observed preparing 12 medications for Resident 30. LN 2 looked in the medication cart and could not locate Resident 30's Brovana (a medication used to treat breathing issues) and stated she would not be able to administer it as scheduled for that morning. A review of Resident 30's medical record indicated that the following physician's order: - Brovana Inhalation Nebulization Solution 15 micrograms /2 milliliters (mcg/ml, a unit of measurement): Inhale one vial orally via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, kitchen staff failed to demonstrate appropriate competencies to carry out kitchen sanitation when: 1. Staff were unable to show the correct procedure for testing of sanitation solution buckets, and 2. Staff did not test dishwashing sanitation at the plate level, which was necessary to ensure adequate sanitation had occurred. These failures had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the 49 residents eating facility prepared food. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 8/20/24 at 9:24 a.m., dietary aide 1 (DA1) was asked to show how the red sanitation buckets were tested to ensure the proper concentration of sanitizer. DA1 threw out the solution in the bucket and refilled from the dispenser on the wall. Another red bucket was in the sink, DA1 was asked to test the existing bucket. DA 1 took a test strip and held in in the solution for 10 seconds (directions on bottle stated to hold in solution for 5 seconds). Upon taking the strip out of the solution, he compared that the test strip to the color coding on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food storage, preparation and cleaning areas were in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1) Foods that had been opened previously were not tightly closed, 2) A dirty fan was turned on and blowing onto clean plate guards, 3) Dishwash sanitizer solution test strips were not correct for solution type (to ensure sanitation occurred), 4) Resident refrigerator/freezer containing food for residents had food products marked with a room number but missing resident name. This failure had the potential to cause food borne illness in 49 of the 51 facility residents that received facility prepared foods. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview during the initial kitchen tour on 8/20/24 at 8:40 a.m., with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), a bag of previously opened shredded cheddar cheese was found unsealed. The CDM verified that the bag of previously opened shredded cheese was not properly sealed. The CDM stated he would want to make sure that this gets sealed so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent was obtained (the process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention) on the use of psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state) for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 447). This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 447 and responsible party (RP) were aware of the risks, benefits, and alternatives of treatment offered to them. Findings: A review of Resident 447's admission records indicated admission to the facility on 8/12/24, with diagnoses which included dementia (the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), and schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave). Resident 447's admission records also indicated a relative was the RP. A review of Resident 447's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for one resident (Resident 15) out of nineteen sampled residents. This failure had the potential to establish incorrect baseline data and treatment for Resident 15. Findings: A review Resident 15's admission Record indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (when problems with metabolism cause brain dysfunction) and generalized weakness. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24 at 9:10 a.m. in Resident 15's room, Resident 15 was lying in bed. There was no urinary catheter tube (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder) or catheter bag (a bag that collects urine) observed. Resident 15 stated, I can get out of bed myself, I don't use a [urinary] catheter. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/22/24 at 3:52 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) Resident 15's Order Summary Report (OSR, physician orders), Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 5/3/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan on the use of a BiPAP ( a noninvasive ventilator that helps people breathe by delivering pressurized air into their airways through a face mask) machine for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure to develop a care plan on the use of a BiPAP machine had the potential for Resident 10 to received inaccurate and inadequate care. Findings: During a record review of Resident 10's facesheet, the clinical record indicated Resident 10 was admitted with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes (a condition of too much sugar in the blood), and Neurocognitive Disorder (a category of mental health disorders that primarily affect cognitive abilities including learning, memory, perception, and problem-solving) with Lewy Bodies (clumps of abnormal protein particles that accumulate in the brain and caused a form of dementia). During the initial pool tour on 8/20/24 at 11 a.m., Resident 10 was observed lying in bed. Resident 10 was was interviewable but confused as to time and place.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly for a census of 51 residents, when a medication cart (a lockable cabinet on wheels that stores drugs and supplies) and a treatment cart (a lockable cabinet on wheels that stores drugs and supplies) were unlocked and unattended. These failures had the potential for drug diversion and drug misuse. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24 at 8:22 a.m. with the Activities Director (AD) in the walkway in front of the nursing station, the AD confirmed a treatment cart was observed to be unlocked with keys hanging from the lock cylinder while no staff were present at the cart. The AD confirmed the cart stored drugs and should have been locked. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24 at 8:27 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), in the walkway in front of the nursing station, medication cart A was observed to be unlocked while no staff was present at the cart. The LN 1 confirmed the cart was unlocked while he was at the nursing station,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident (296) the appropriate nutritive profile matching the physician prescribed renal diet when potatoes were served. This failure had to potential to lead to confusion regarding diet restrictions for the resident, as well as lead to heart issues due to the high potassium content from the meal provided. Findings: During an observation of the lunch meal on 8/20/24 at 12:50 p.m., Resident 296 was in his bed eating his lunch. The meal plate contained turkey, 2 scoops of mashed potatoes, and broccoli. Resident 296 points to the potatoes and stated that those aren't allowed on the renal diet. Resident 296's tray ticket showed that a renal diet had been ordered, and potatoes were listed as a dislike. During an interview on 8/20/24 at 3:45 p.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM confirmed that renal diet restrictions were listed in the dislike column of the meal tray tickets to provide another cue to food servers of what they should not serve. In reviewing resident 296's tray ticket, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the infection prevention and control program guidelines and practices were maintained for a census of 51, when Certified Nursing Assistant 5 (CNA 5) was observed taking trash from one resident room to another and allowed trash bags to rest against her clothing. This failure had the potential to result in transmission and spread of infection for a vulnerable population. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/22/24 at 8:15 a.m. with CNA 5 in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], CNA 5 was observed removing and carrying two bags from room [ROOM NUMBER] and then entered room [ROOM NUMBER] with the two bags, and then CNA 5 exited room [ROOM NUMBER] with the two bags. CNA 5 stopped to speak with the Department and was observed resting the two bags against her leg, making direct contact with her pants. CNA 5 stated the two bags contained trash from room [ROOM NUMBER] and she had taken the two bags of trash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a pneumococcal vaccine (immunization [process of becoming protected against a disease through vaccination] against pneumonia [an inflammatory condition of the lung]) for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 15). This failure placed Resident 15 at an increased risk for illness that the vaccine could have prevented or decreased the severity of symptoms. Findings: A review of Resident 15's admission record, indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in April of 2024 with diagnoses that included a history of having a tumor in the lungs and respiratory failure (not enough oxygen passes from the lungs to the blood). A review of Resident 15's Pneumococcal Vaccine Informed Consent, dated 4/27/24, indicated Resident 15 marked the option I hereby GIVE the facility permission to administer a pneumococcal vaccination . to the best of my knowledge, I have not received a pneumococcal vaccination in the past five years . A review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool), dated 8/3/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the reach-in freezer in a safe operating condition when ice build-up was found on the freezer ceiling. This had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the 49 residents receiving facility prepared meals. Findings: During the initial kitchen observation on 8/20/24 at 9:04 a.m., the reach-in freezer was opened to reveal circles of ice crystals (approximately ½ inch in diameter) on the freezer ceiling. The freezer door gasket appeared misshapen in the upper, outer corners. During a concurrent interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM confirmed the ice build-up on the freezer ceiling. During a return visit to the kitchen on 8/22/24 at 9:20 a.m., the reach-in freezer was shown to the Maintenance Supervisor (MS). The MS noted the buildup of ice on the freezer ceiling and stated that it may be the result of the freezer door not being closed tightly. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 4:24 p.m. with the CDM, the CDM stated that the problem with ice build-up in the freezer was that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light (a device used by a resident to signal the need for help) was accessible for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 297), when Resident 297 was not physically able to use the type of call light provided. This failure had the potential to result in unmet resident needs and delayed staff response. Findings: A review of Resident 297's admission record indicated, Resident 297 was admitted in early August of 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (a loss of memory and problem-solving abilities which interfere with daily life) and anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). A review of Resident 297's Minimum Data Set (MDS: an assessment tool), dated 8/12/24, indicated Resident 297 was always incontinent (lacks control) with bowel movements and urination and was dependent on staff to provide toileting hygiene. A review of Resident 297's care plan, dated 8/6/24, indicated, .Resident is at risk for falls and/or injuries .interventions .Keep the call light within reach and encourage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow guidelines for infection control practices for two of five sampled residents, Resident 4 and Resident 5 when: 1. Social Services Assistant (SSA) did not wear the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) before entering Resident 4's room; and 2. Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) did not wear the full required PPE before entering Resident 5's room. This deficient practice had the potential to spread infections among residents, staff and visitors. Findings: 1. During a review of the admission Record for Resident 4, the admission Record indicated, Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included sepsis (serious infection condition), and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection (MRSA, contagious bacterial infection, superbug). During a review of Resident 4's Order Summary, dated 7/31/24, the Order Summary indicated, [Name of Antibiotic], use 1 gram intravenously two times a day for MRSA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate with the PASRR (Preadmission Screening And Resident Review, for residents with a mental disorder) evaluation program for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had positive results on Level I screening which required Level II screening to identify the specialized services required by the resident. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for not receiving rehabilitative services that the resident needed. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record, admission Record indicated the resident had diagnoses that included mental illness, mood disorder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, noncompliance with treatment and regimen, and history of frequent hospitalizations. Review of the Resident 1's clinical record, Nurses Progress Note, dated 6/6/24, indicated the resident sustained a 3 x 2 cm (centimeter) bump, a 0.5 cm laceration on left forehead and a 2 x 2 cm bump on the right cheek after a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 6/6/24. However, the resident refused to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one resident (Resident 1) in a facility census of 48 when Resident 1's personal items were moved beyond her reach and complaints about her roommate were not addressed timely to ensure her dignity and well-being. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling distressed and upset. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility October 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of sacral region (near base of the spine) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease where blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document containing patient information), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was her own responsible party. During an interview and concurrent document review on 1/9/24, at 12:35 p.m., with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD confirmed she received an email on 1/5/24 at 4:41 p.m. with a complaint that Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1's) right to be free from abuse when a fellow resident took her personal belongings. This caused Resident 1 to be feel distressed, emotionally unsafe, and unable to sleep. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility October 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included a pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of the sacral region (near base of the spine) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease where blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document containing patient information), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was her own responsible party. During an interview and concurrent document review on 1/9/24, at 12:35 p.m., with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD confirmed she received an email on 1/5/24 at 4:41 p.m. with a complaint that Resident 1's roommate had eaten Resident 1's snacks while she slept. The email indicated Resident 1 is,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and theft/misappropriation of property to local, state, and federal agencies within 24 hours for one resident (Resident 1) in a facility census of 48, when a friend of Resident 1 reported to the Social Services Director (SSD) an allegation of Resident 1 feeling frightened and unsafe. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to remain fearful when the facility delayed reporting and investigating. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility October 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of sacral region (near base of the spine) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease where blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document containing patient information), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was her own responsible party. During an interview and concurrent document review on 1/9/24, at 12:35 p.m., with the SSD, the SSD confirmed she received an email on 1/5/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating Policy for one resident (Resident 1) in a facility census of 48 when the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's allegation of abuse and mistreatment was timely and thoroughly investigated. This failure to protect one of their vulnerable residents and provide a safe environment caused Resident 1 to feel emotionally unsafe and fearful. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility October 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of sacral region (near base of the spine) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease where blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document containing patient information), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was her own responsible party. During an interview and concurrent document review on 1/9/24, at 12:35 p.m., with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 2 ' s) right to privacy was protected when the privacy curtain did not fully surround the resident's bed and provide her with full privacy. This failure resulted in Resident 2 to have felt exposed and subjected to bright lights that blinded her from the bathroom. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses that included paralysis of the legs and lower body. Review of Resident 2's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet, an assessment tool), dated 9/19/23, indicated she was cognitively intact with a score of 15/15 in the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment. In a concurrent observation and interview on 11/20/23 at 11:45 a.m., Resident 2 was lying in her bed in a shared two-bed room. Resident 2 complained that she did not have full privacy in her room because the privacy curtain did not wrap around her bed fully and stated, I don't have no privacy. Resident 2 pointed to the privacy curtain between her and her roommate and stated it did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented. This failure failed to provide sufficient information for staff to respond to the changing status, needs and after care of the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure (heart cannot pump blood efficiently), diabetes, and end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer function). Resident 1's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool), dated 7/9/23, described Resident 1 as able to make himself understood and able to understand others. Resident 1's BIMS (a brief screening that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score was 11 which indicated he was moderately impaired. The MDS described Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AMM TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 06/01/2023
SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/01/2023
GASTWIRTH, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 06/01/2023
MCCORMACK, RYANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF20%since 06/01/2023
O'SHEA, BRADYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 06/01/2023
BRANDI, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
OAKWOOD HEALTH LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
CODY, CHERIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/27/2023
CRUMMIE, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/21/2022
JOJOLA, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/11/2024
MAYORAL, ROSENDOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
MCCORMACK, BRENNANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/06/2023
MONTERROSO, GLENDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/23/2024
SAEPHANH, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2024
SHEKIAB, SAHARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/26/2024
SHRESTHA, NITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2022
SMITH, GREGORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$403K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 15%Other / private 19%

This home reported $403K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$448per resident / day
operating cost
$13,608per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$446per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055296. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next