The Win Post-Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 214 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 131.0 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was not free from physical abuse when Resident 1 was found in bed with multiple bruises to the face and arms, swelling on the bridge of the nose and right eyebrow, a cut on the lower lip, blood in the mouth, on the lips, and on the fingers, and chipped teeth. Resident 1 passed away, and the immediate cause of death was documented as, Blunt force injury [injury caused by forceful impact from an object without sharp edges or points] of head complicating hypertensive [having high blood pressure] and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [heart disease involving plaque buildup in the arteries]. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually caused by infection), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), severe protein-calorie…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2021-06-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish) policy for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 14) when certified nursing assistant A (CNA A) continued to provide direct care for activities of daily living (ADLs, such as bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, bathing, personal hygiene, locomotion on unit, and locomotion off unit), had interactions with Resident 14 during weights monitoring and assistance with social dining after an abuse incident investigation when Resident 14 alleged CNA A committed verbal abuse. These failures resulted in Resident 14's emotional distress and social isolation. Findings: Review of Resident 14's undated face sheet indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of diabetes (increase in blood sugar), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), muscle weakness, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services in accordance with professional standard of practice for one of two residents (Resident 1) when nursing staff failed to follow up an order for a medication.This failure had the potential for negative health outcomes related to not receiving prescribed medication as ordered.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, enlargement of the prostate gland [part of the male reproductive system], type II diabetes mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood), wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra (collapse of the bone in the spine).Review of Resident 1's physician's order, dated 11/11/25, indicated Finasteride 5 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) tablet to give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for BPH.Review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), indicated the medication Finasteride was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to delay abuse investigations and compromise Resident 1's safety.Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had the diagnosis of spinal stenosis (the space inside the bones of the spine gets too small), anxiety disorder (a mental health condition), difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness.Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 5/1/25, indicated his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 15 (BIMS score of 13-15 indicates cognitively intact).During a telephone interview with Resident 1 on 6/3/25, at 12:01 p.m., he stated that he was assaulted by his co-resident and did not feel safe in the facility. Resident 1 stated that his co-resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for oxygen administration for three of nine residents receiving oxygen therapy in the facility when: 1. Resident 20 was administered the wrong dose of oxygen. 2. Resident 49 was administered oxygen without a doctor's order. 3. Resident 16 was administered the wrong dose of oxygen. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 20's, Resident 49's, and Resident 16's health. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/5/25, at 1:17 p.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) A, in Resident 20's room, Resident 20 was observed wearing a nasal cannula (plastic tubing which supplies oxygen from a machine). RN A stated, she saw Resident 20s oxygen set to between 2.5 and 3 liters (measure of oxygen give to patient per minute). RN A stated, she will lower it, the order is for 2 liters for Resident 20, it should be at 2 liters per the doctor's order. During a review of Resident 20's Order Summary Report dated 5/8/25 indicated, Resident 20 had an order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 40 out of 69 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) who have worked at the facility for over one year were reviewed annually for a performance review per federal regulation. This failure resulted in the facility being unaware of 40 CNA's performance through the prior year. This failure also had the potential for CNA's performance to be below the standard or practice for patient care. Findings: During a review of CNA I's employee file, undated, employee file indicated, no annual performance review was documented. CNA I's hire date was 9/29/2021 During a review of CNA J's employee file, undated, employee file indicated, no annual performance review was documented. CNA J's hire date was 1/12/2017. During an interview on 5/07/25, at 1:18 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated, she took over the position of DSD as interim for the last two weeks. DSD stated, I do not know what the prior DSD's process was, but we looked in her desk and did not find any annual performance reviews for the CNAs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled medication (medication with high potential for abuse and addiction) when random controlled medication use audit for three of twelve residents (Residents 93, 3 and 87) did not reconcile when: 1. The medication was documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR, used to document medications taken by each individual) to indicate they were administered to Resident 93 but was not signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications). 2. The medication was signed out of the CDR but not documented on the MAR for Resident 87 and Resident 3. The failure resulted in inaccurate accountability and had the potential for misuse or diversion of controlled medications. Findings: 1. The Controlled Drug Record (CDR) for twelve residents receiving controlled medications were requested for review during the survey. A review of Resident 93's clinical record indicated she had a Physician order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 34) was free from inappropriate and unnecessary medication use when the medication Midodrine HCI (to treat low blood pressure) was given outside of the ordered parameters. This failure had the potential for causing harm to Resident 34's health and well-being. Findings: During review of Resident 34's medication administration record (provides a comprehensive, organized record of each medication administered to a patient) (MAR), dated May 2025, the MAR indicated Resident 34 received Midodrine HCI 5 milligrams (a unit of measure) (Mg) on 5/8/25 when the blood pressure (refers to the force of circulating blood against the walls of blood vessels. Blood pressure is measured in two values: systolic [highest pressure during a heartbeat] and diastolic [lowest pressure between heartbeats]) was 126/68. During review of Resident 34's orders dated 3/4/25, the order indicated Midodrine HCl oral tablet 5 MG, one tablet by mouth three times a day for hypotension, hold for SBP (systolic blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the lack of annual performance reviews for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) in their Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI- a plan developed by the facility with the goal of improving conditions in the facility) when monitoring of employee files was not documented as reviewed for regulatory compliance, per the QAPI monitoring plan. As a result, the facility did not identify 40 of 69 CNAs employeed by the facility did not have a documented annual performance review. (see F730). Findings: During a review of the facility's QAPI Plan, updated 2017, QAPI plan indicated, Quality Surveillance Data.Education/In-Service Tracking, Responsible for Review/reporting to Committee Director of Staff Development, Action Plan(s) required for: Federal/State required in-services not completed per regulations, personnel files audits that result in negative findings. QAPI Plan indicated, Random personnel file reviews should occur quarterly to determine compliance with training and documentation requirements as well as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were implementing infection prevention practices when: 1. One of four Certified Nursing Assistances (CNA) failed to perform hand hygiene between residents during dining; 2. Resident 309's intravenous (IV, to deliver a medication into a vein) tubing tip left uncapped when not in use. During an observation on 05/06/25 at 12:53 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F, was in the dining room sitting between Resident 5 and Resident 44 feeding them both lunch without cleaning her hands between Residents. During an interview on 05/06/25 at 3:07 p.m., CNA F stated, She washes hands prior to feeding the residents but does not clean hands between residents when feeding two residents at the same time. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Hand Hygiene, dated 5/29/24 indicated, Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table .Between…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for two of 15 residents (Resident 34 & 74) when there was no evidence the facility reviewed or revised the care plan with new recommendations to prevent the Resident from falling again. This failure had the potential to result in further falls and/or injury. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 34's Fall Report Incident dated 2/21/25, it indicated Resident 34 had a fall on 2/21/25 at 4:30 p.m. During a review of Resident 34's care plans, dated 11/25/24 last revision, indicated no care plan following the 2/21/25 fall or revisions to the previous care plan. During an interview on 5/8/25 at 1:31 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated, the care plan was not updated after the fall. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Fall Prevention and Response, dated 8/2023, indicated Facility will monitor effectiveness of planned fall prevention interventions no less often than quarterly and modify interventions when necessary, such as following a significant COC or fall accident.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to prevent and/or heal pressure ulcers (damage to the skin or underlying tissue as a result of prolonged pressure) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 308) with pressureulcers when staff did not follow physician's order for heel protectors (device applied to the feet to minimize pressure on the heels). This failure had the potential to result in worsening of resdient 308's pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of Resident 308's clinical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (a condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), pancytopenia (abnormally low amounts of all three types of blood cells, red, white and platelets), encephalopathy (disease that affects brain function), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 308's clinical record indicated a physician order for right and left heel skin barrier film as needed every shift for pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA