Evergreen Post Acute
3034 South Dupont Blvd, Smyrna, DE 19977 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 151 certified beds · (302) 653-5085 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Apr 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $94,156 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-17)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.5% | 12.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.2% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 37.8% | 10.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.5% | 13.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.2% | 21.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 97.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 3.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.6% | 20.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.2% | 10.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 83.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 23.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.6% | 11.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.81 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.64 | 1.40 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.1%CMS range 46.3–61.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.4–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.4–10.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 137.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R109) out of seven residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement safe bed mobility practices to prevent a fall. As a result, R109 fell from the bed, sustained a head laceration, required hospital transfer, and received six sutures causing harm to the resident. Findings include:Review of R109 clinical record revealed:6/9/25 - R109 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including seizures, gastrostomy tube, tracheostomy, anxiety, and muscle spasms.A care plan last updated 6/10/25 documented ADL self-care deficit related to physical limitations. Interventions included assistance with daily hygiene, grooming, dressing, oral care, and eating as needed. The care plan further documented R109 required a two-person assist for transfers and bed mobility. Additionally, the care plan documented R109 was at risk for falls related to poor safety awareness, seizure and adjustment to a new environment. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R155) out of one resident reviewed for hydration, the facility failed to ensure that R155 was offered sufficient fluids to maintain proper hydration. This failure resulted in harm with R155 being transferred to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses of dehydration and AKI (acute kidney injury). Findings include:The BUN (blood urea nitrogen) lab measures the amount of urea nitrogen in the blood. The BUN is directly related to the metabolic function of the liver and the excretory function of the kidney . BUN levels also may vary according to the state of hydration, with increased levels seen in dehydration and decreased levels seen in overhydration. Mosby's Diagnostic and Laboratory Test Reference 2023. Review of R155's clinical record revealed:6/12/25 - R155 was admitted to the facility. 6/17/25 - A care plan documented that R155 was at risk for nutrition/hydration risk related to dementia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, aphasia, hemiparesis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R644) out of eleven residents, the facility failed to ensure that R644 was free of medication error. On 9/13/24, R644 was inadvertently given the incorrect medications (amlodopine 10mg, benzapril 40mg, Coreg 25 mg and selevamer 800mg). This medication error resulted in harm as R644's blood pressure significantly dropped and she was sent emergently to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. This harm is being cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Facility's Medication Administration policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Procedure: 3. Identify resident by photo in the MAR (medication administration record) . 10. Compare medication source with MAR to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route and time . Rev. 1/2025 Review of R644's clinical record revealed: 9/12/24 - R644…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REVISED POST IDR Based on observation, interviews and record review it was determined that for one (R110) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent an avoidable deep tissue injury from developing, causing harm. Findings include: Review of R110's clinical record revealed: 7/7/23 - R110 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus with other circulatory complications, dementia, progressive neuropathy and stroke. 7/7/23 - A care plan, last revised 1/4/24, documented that R110 was at risk for alteration in skin integrity related to diabetes, impaired mobility and incontinence. The care plan included to notify physician and significant other of any change in skin condition, observe skin condition with activities of daily living every day and report abnormalities and turn and reposition with skin checks every two hours. 1/9/24 - A quarterly MDS for R110 documented that R110 was dependent to move from sitting to lying, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, for lower body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, it was determined that for one (R106) out of five residents reviewed for bowel and bladder, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services to restore and/or maintain bladder function were implemented. Findings include: Review of R106's clinical records revealed: Cross Refer to F641, F656, F689 and F842 The facility's policy titled, Incontinence with a revised date 1/2024, documented, Based on resident's comprehensive assessment, all residents that are incontinent will receive appropriate treatment and services .1. must ensure that residents who are continent of bladder and bowel upon admission receive appropriate treatment, services, and assistance to maintain continence unless his or her clinical condition is or becomes such that continence is not possible to maintain .4. Residents .incontinent of bowel and bladder will receive appropriate treatment .and to restore continence to the extent possible .5. Periodically (as required and when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews, it was determined that for one (R106) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that R106 received adequate supervision to prevent falls. R106 fell two times due to lack of adequate supervision by staff resulting in harm to the resident, broken ribs and broken nose, which required him to be transferred to the hospital for treatment and evaluation. Additionally, R106 had multiple falls due to the lack of assistance with toileting and on 8/14/23, R106 got up to the bathroom that resulted in R106's fall and broken ribs. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents dated 1/2024, documented, Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility - wide priorities . Individualized, Resident - Centered Approach to Safety .4. Implementing interventions to reduce accident risks and hazards .c. Providing training . d. Ensuring that interventions are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R399) out of one resident reviewed for hydration, the facility failed to ensure that R399 was offered adequate fluid intake to prevent dehydration. This resulted in harm where R399 was transferred to the hospital with a diagnosis of dehydration and lithium toxicity. Findings include: Review of R399's clinical record revealed: 6/10/23 - A hospital laboratory result documented R399's lithium level as 1.2 mmol/L (normal 0.5 - 1.2 mmol/L). The BUN was 14 mg/dL (normal is 7.0 - 17.0), the creatinine level was 0.71 mg/dL (normal is 0.52 - 1.04). 6/14/23 - R399 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to bipolar disorder, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. 6/14/23 - E6 (MD) signed an order for lithium 900 mg by mouth at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. 6/14/23 - E6 signed an order for lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide 10 - 12.5 mg by mouth at bedtime for hypertension including a diuretic medication which can lead to dehydration.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R30) out of five residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source to the State Agency within the required timeframe. Findings include:Review of R30's clinical record revealed:4/1/23 - R30 was admitted to the facility.3/8/26 1:00 PM - A facility reported incident documented that R30 had an injury of unknown origin determined by a positive x-ray report of a fractured right hip.3/8/26 8:35 PM - A Radiology Results Report documented an acute fracture to R30's right hip. 3/9/26 12:59 AM - A facility reported incident was submitted to the State Agency 12 hours after incident occurred. 5/8/26 12:28 PM - During an interview, E2 (DON) confirmed that the aforementioned report was not submitted to the State Agency within the appropriate timeframe. 5/11/26 3:20 PM - Findings were reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R30) out of three residents reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure care/treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. Review of R30's clinical record revealed:4/1/23 - R30 was admitted to the facility. 3/8/26 10:48 AM - An SBAR (provider communication note) documented that R30 was observed with right hip discomfort and swelling noted. The SBAR also documented the provider was notified and awaiting a return call. 3/8/26 3:22 PM - A telephone physician's order for R30 documented diagnostic imaging x-ray of bilateral hips with two views. 3/8/26 8:35 PM - A radiology results report documented that x-ray was obtained and completed at 5:03 PM on 3/8/26. The results indicated and acute fracture of R30's right hip. 3/8/26 11:09 PM - A nursing progress note documented that R30 had a positive fracture to the right hip and was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. 5/8/26 10:13 AM - At this time multiple attempts were made to contact E28 (LPN) to determine the time line of events…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R153) out of six residents reviewed for pharmacy services, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident. Findings include: Review of R153's clinical record revealed:1/9/26 - R153 was admitted to the facility. 1/9/26 - A physician's order documented nafcillin sodium (antibiotic) in dextrose intravenous solution 2GM/100mL: Use 2 gram intravenously every 8 hours for pneumonia for 15 days. 1/10/26 - A review of the January MAR documented H on the aforementioned nafcillin order for 12:00 AM and 8:00 AM dose due to medication not available from pharmacy. The MAR lacked evidence of a hold order for the dose on 1/9/26 at 4:00 PM. 1/13/26 - A physician's order documented cefazolin sodium injection solution 2 GM: Use 2 gram intravenously three times a day for endocarditis and bacteremia prophylaxis. 1/13/26 11:41 PM - A progress note documented that cefazolin was on order from the pharmacy. The MAR documented 8 for the 10:00 PM dose with the aforementioned progress note. 5/8/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two out of three resident units the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. Findings include: 4/15/25 10:23 AM - During an observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] Seaside Unit, the bathroom door frame had multiple areas of chipped paint. The wall to the right of the bathroom had several scrapes and an exposed metal plate was observed on the left corner of the bathroom wall. 4/15/25 10:32 AM - During an observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] Seaside Unit, the wall to the right of the bathroom had multiple scrapes and black marks. 4/15/25 10:41 AM - During an observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] Seaside Unit, the bathroom wall facing the toilet had two areas of missing plaster just above the baseboard. 4/15/25 10:52 AM - During an interview, E7 (CNA) stated she has worked on the unit for five years and was aware of the rooms in question the needed repairs. When asked how long the rooms have been in a state of disrepair? E7 responded way over six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five residents (R91, R119, R120, R130, and R440) out of forty three sampled residents, it was determined that for R440 and R130 the facility failed to implement care plan interventions. For R12, the facility failed to hold a quarterly care plan meeting. For R91, R119, and R120 the facility failted to have input from all required interdisciplinary team (IDT) members at the residents' care plan meetings. Findings include: 1. Review of R440's clinical record revealed: 4/1/25 - R440 was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (a condition in which high levels of a hormone cause the body to retain water). 4/2/25 3:00 PM - A physician's was order written for R440 that documented Fluid restriction 1200 milliters a day. 4/2/25 - R440's care plan that was initiated on 4/2/25 documented potential/alteration in nutritional status r/t (sic) need for mechanically altered, fluid restricted diet. The care plan lacked evidence the resident was resistive to the physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in manner that prevents food borne illness to the residents. Findings include: 1. 4/8/25 8:20 AM - Observation and inspection of the Sierra Unit nourishment refridgerator revealed that it contained a sandwich, container of pickles and a container of sliced tomatoes that were undated and unlabeled. The finding was immediately confirmed by E20 (LPN) unit manager. 2. 4/8/25 11:28 AM - During a dining observation in the main dining room, E21 (DA) was observed wearing gloves and holding a paper meal ticket in the right hand. At 11:33 AM, E21 left the dining room and entered the kitchen to communicate with kitchen staff. E21 then returned to the dining room at the food service counter still holding the same meal ticket paper in right hand, touched her nose, adjusted her face mask with the left hand then reached into the bag of bread with the same left hand to prepare a sandwich. The surveyor intervened, and E21 put down the meal ticket, and discarded both gloves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R14 and R639) out of twelve residents reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to initiate and maintain appropriate precautions per CDC guidelines. Additionally the facility failed to follow standard precautions. Findings include: CDC's Infection Control Appendix A: Type and duration of Precautions Recommended for Selected Infections and Conditions .Multidrug-resistant organisms, infection or colonization (e.g., MRSA, VRE, VISA/VRSA, ESBLs, resistant S.pneumoniae) Contact + Standard . February 7, 2025 Facility's Infection Prevention and control Program Policy: .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .5. Isolation Protocol (Transmission-Based Precautions): a. A resident with an infection or communicable disease shall be placed on transmission-based precautions as recommended by current CDC guidelines. Rev 1/2025 Facility's Enhanced Barrier Precaution Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R14) out of forty-three (43) residents in the investigative sample, the facility failed to ensure R14 was treated with respect and dignity. Findings include: 1. Review of R14's clinical record revealed: 12/13/20 - R14 was admitted to the facility. 4/8/25 8:34 AM - During an observation, E45 (CNA) knocked on R14's room door and entered the room without waiting for R14's response/permission to enter the room. 4/8/25 8:45 AM - During an observation, E44 (Central Supply) knocked on R14's room door and entered the room without waiting for R14's response/permission to enter the room. 4/8/25 9:01 AM - During an interview E44 (Central Supply) confirmed that the expectation is to knock and wait for a response to enter a resident's room. E44 confirmed that she did not wait for a response before entering R14's room. 4/8/25 9:49 AM - During an observation, E45 knocked on R14's room door and entered the room without waiting for R14's response/permission to enter the room. 4/11/25 2:16 PM - During an observation, E45 knocked on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a random observation and interview, it was determined that for four (R37, R69, R72, and R133) residents, the facility failed to protect personal privacy. Findings include: 4/10/25 11:08 AM - A random observation of the staff charting station on Sierra Unit with a monitor displaying resident's protected health information: - R37's admission date, admitting diagnoses, and birthdate. - R69's admission date, admitting diagnoses, and birthdate. - R72's admission date, admitting diagnoses, and birthdate. - R133's admission date, admitting diagnoses, and birthdate. 4/10/25 11:10 AM - During an interview with E3 (ADON), it was confirmed that a charting station monitor was left open, displaying R37's, R69's, R72's and R133's personal protected health information (PHI). The information was visible to anyone passing by the monitor. E3 took immediate action to close the screen and secure the PHI. 4/17/25 1:45 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined for two (R40 and R50) out of forty-three sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure the MDS was accurate. Findings include: 1. Review of R40's clinical record revealed: 12/15/15 - R40 was admitted to the facility. 9/10/24 - A quarterly MDS assessment documented R40 was experiencing verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others for one to three days during the review period. 9/2024 - A CNA behavioral flow sheet documented R40 had behaviors for five days from 9/3/24 to 9/10/24. 12/10/24 - A quarterly MDS assessment documented R40 was experiencing verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others for one to three days during the review period. 12/2024 - A CNA behavioral flow sheet documented R40 had behaviors for five days from 12/3/24 to 12/10/24. 4/17/25 10:15 AM - During an interview, E46 (RN) confirmed that R40 had an increase in verbal behaviors specifically during shift change prior to R40 moving to a different unit. 4/17/25 10:30 AM - During an interview, E5 (SW) confirmed that the MDS data was not accurate for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviewed and interview it was determined that for one (R196) out of forty-three residents sampled, the facility failed to ensure the person centered care plan included necessary interventions. Findings include: The facility policy on dialysis care last updated, January 2025 indicated, The nurse will monitor and document the status of the resident's access site. Review of R196's clinical record revealed: 2/15/25 - R196 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including kidney disease. 2/16/25 - A task was added to R196's physicians orders for blood pressure medications for staff not to obtain blood pressures on the resident's right arm. 2/18/25 - A care plan was created for R196's renal disease. Interventions for the care plan included dialysis twice a week, monitor lab and report abnormal results, observe for and report any signs of infection/leaking/dislodgement of dialysis catheter and record weights and report changes. There was no evidence that the care plan included an intervention to avoid blood pressures to the right arm due to the dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record reviews it was determined that for one (R132) out of one resident reviewed for communication the facility failed to provide assistive devices to support communication for R132 who was fluent only in Spanish. 3/8/25 - R132 was admitted to facility for rehabilitation. 3/8/25 - The care plan documented that R132's participation in activities was limited due to a language barrier, as the resident was fluent only in Spanish. R132 had difficulty communicating, as evidenced by a limited understanding and use of English. The care plan goal was to facilitate communication through alternative methods, such as a communication board, to express needs and wants. Interventions included teaching R132 how to use a communication book/board or electronic device and utilizing a Spanish interpreter as needed. 3/10/25 - A baseline care plan documented Spanish as the primary language for R132. 3/10/25 - A physician's order for speech therapy evaluation and treatment 1-3x per week for 41 days for dysphagia therapy and group therapy as indicated. 3/17/25 - An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of R73's clinical record revealed: 1/2/20 - R73 was admitted to the facility. 1/4/20 - A care plan documented that R73 required assitance with all ADL's with the following interventions: assist with daily hygiene, grooming, oral care, and eating as needed; encourage to participate in self care; praise all efforts; report any changes or decline to provider. 2/25/25 - A quaterly MDS documented R73 required set up or clean up assistance of one staff member for oral hygiene. Additionally the MDS documented R73had a BIMS score of 15 meaning he was cognitively intact. 4/8/25 8:21 AM - An interview with R73 revealed the need for assistance with ADL's and he feels that staff is not attentive to his needs. 4/10/25 9:37 AM - An interview with R73 confirmed that he brushes his teeth after staff set up breakfast. Also, R73 confirmed he had not been set up at this time to bursh his teeth. 4/10/25 11:26 AM - An observation of R73 had not brushed his teeth and R73's toothbrush was sitting in cup in bathroom dry. 4/10/25 11:34 AM - An interview with E45 (CNA) confirmed that she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for two (R112 and R644) out of forty three residents reviewed in the investigative sample, the facility failed to ensure received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders. Findings include: 1. Review of R112's clinical record revealed: Cross refer F603 and F880 7/30/24 - R112 was admitted to the facility. 8/27/24 3:12 PM - A physician's order documented that R112 was on contact isolation due to scabies for fourteen days. 11/9/24 - A physicians order was written for R112 consult to dermatology related to scabies. 11/13/24 - A specialist physician's (dermatologist) progress note documented that R112 was not contagious and to remove isolation precautions. 4/15/25 10:30 AM - An interview with C2 (NP) and C5 (NP) confirmed that R112 was on contact precautions from 8/27/24 to 11/13/24. There was a ten week delay in consulting the dermatologist resulting in R112 being in isolation for 78 days. 2. R644's clinical record revealed: Cross refer F760 9/12/24 - R644 admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R35) out of 11 resiedents reviewed for accidents the facility failed to implement a care planned fall intervention. Findings include: Review of R35's clinical record revealed: 6/27/24 - R35 was admitted to the facility. 6/27/24 - An admission MDS documented the resident required extensive to total assistance with most ADLs, including transfers and mobility. The resident was dependent for bed mobility, toileting, and dressing. 9/25/24 - R35 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital with diagnoses including a right broken leg from a fall at the facility. A care plan revised on 10/2/24 included a new intervention for fall mats to be placed at the bedside when R35 is in bed. 10/3/24 - A fall risk assessment scored R35 at 17, indicating a high risk. On the following dates, no fall mats were observed at the bedside while R35 was in bed: 4/8/25 at 7:46 AM 4/11/25 at 2:27 PM 4/15/25 at 10:25 AM On 4/15/25 from approximately 10:55 AM to 11:00 AM, during an interview and observation with E15 (CNA) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R3) out of ten residents sampled for dining, the facility failed to provide the therapeutic diet that was prescribed by the physician. The facility failed to provide R3 large portions. Findings include: Review of R3's clinical record revealed: 5/24/24 - R3 was admitted to the facility. 1/23/25 - A physician's order for R3 documented low concentrated sweets diet, regular texture, thin liquid consistency: give large portions for all three meals. 4/14/25 12:10 PM - An observation of R3's meal tray that contained one piece of chicken, mashed potatoes, string beans, fruit cup and drinks on tray. The mashed potatoes and vegetables were one serving and not large portions. 4/14/25 12:26 PM - An interview with E40 (CNA) confirmed that R3 was on large portions and if R3 wants them she will ask staff for more. E40 confirmed that the mashed potatoes and green beans were not large portion. 4/14/25 12:29 PM - An interview with E41 (FSD) confirmed that large portions refers to the sides and double portions refers to the entrees.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R18 & R33) out of five residents reviewed for antibiotic usage, the facility failed to monitor antibiotic usage. Findings include: Facility's Antibiotic Stewardship program Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of this program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use . Rev. 12/2024 1. Review of R18's clinical record revealed: 9/9/21 - R18 was admitted to the facility. 12/10/24 - C5 (consultant NP) entered an order in R18's EMR stating, Metronidazole (antibiotic) oral tablet 500 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for cellulitis of penis for 5 days. 12/12/24 - C3 (consultant MD) documented in R18's re-admission history and physical note, .admitted to [hospital] for penis necrosis, and underwent debridement of penis on 12/7/24 .Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R33 and R96) out of twelve residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccines, the facility failed to accurately assess the residents' pneumococcal vaccine status. Findings include: Facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) Policy: It is our policy to offer our residents immunization against pneumococcal disease in accordance with current CDC guidelines and recommendations . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Each resident will be assessed for pneumococcal immunization upon admission .6. A pneumococcal vaccination is recommended for all adults 65 years and older and based on the following recommendations: . b. For adults 65 years or older who have only received a PPSV23: Give 1 dose PVC15 or PCV20. 1. The PCV15 or PCV20 dose should be administered at least one year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination . Rev 1/2025 1. Review of R33's clinical record revealed: 12/25/24 - R33,aged [AGE] years, was admitted to the facility. 12/25/24 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R641) out of the seven residents reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure that R641's' representative was included in the advanced directive acknowledgment as R641 had cognitive impairment. Findings include: Review of R641's clinical record revealed: 7/5/24 - R641 was admitted to the facility. 7/11/24 - R641's admission MDS documented a BIMS score of 11, which was reflective of moderate cognitive impairment. 4/11/25 10:05 AM - A review of R641's EMR revealed that R641's face sheet listed F4 (R641's daughter) as the emergency contact #1. The EMR also contained documentation of a signed and notarized POA with two witnesses dated from 2006 that named F4 as the sole POA for both durable medical and financial issues. 4/11/25 10:25 AM - A review of R641's admission paperwork revealed that E6 (SW) completed the Advance Directive Acknowledgment form with R641 on 7/5/24. A review of the form revealed that R641 printed her name on the signature line using a different first name and mispelling her last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R188) out of four residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification Review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was informed in advance of a change that occurred to their bill. Findings include: Review of R188's clinical record revealed: 5/2/24 - R188 was admitted to the facility. 6/1/24 - An Eligibility Verification Notice was provided to the facility by R188's insurance that indicated the resident had 0 days remaining for nursing home stay. 6/3/24 11:15 AM - A SNFABN notice was read over the telephone to R188's Responsible Party (RP)(R188's daughter) that explained beginning on 6/4/25 R188 and RP would be responsible to pay out of pocket for the R188's facility stay. The notice was completed by E5 (SW) and witnessed by E6 (SW). 4/11/25 8:15 AM - During an interview, E4 (BOM) confirmed that R188 and RP were not made aware of the change in billing in advance. E4 explained that the facility was made aware of R188's change in coverage on 6/3/24 and provided the SNFABN notice that same day, then charged R188…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, for one (R112) out of five sampled for abuse, it was determined that R112 was not free from involuntary seclusion. Findings include: Cross refer F684 and F880. Review of R112's clinical record revealed: 7/30/24 - R112 was admitted to the facility. 8/18/24 - A SBAR (physician's communication tool) documented that R112 had a rash on both arms and upper thighs. 8/18/24 3:15 PM - A nursing skin observation tool documented R112 had the following skin conditions noted: right antecubital rash, left antecubital rash, bilateral thighs front. 8/27/24 - A care plan documented that R112 was placed on isolation precautions related to scabies. 8/27/24 3:12 PM - A physician's order documented that R112 was on contact isolation due to scabies for fourteen days. R112's 8/24 MAR documented that Ivermectin oral tablets and Permethrin external cream for scabies were started on 8/29/24. 9/3/24 - A physician (C5 NP) progress note documented that R112 was seen and examined for a scabies. C5 documented for R112 to continue on Permethrin external cream to skin at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R79) out of five residents reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to notify R79's responsible party in writing of the reason for transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Review of R79's clinical record revealed: 11/6/20 - R79 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses including but not limited to, dementia. 4/1/25 - R79's quarterly MDS documented a BIMS score as three, which reflected severe cognitive impairment. 4/5/25 9:38 PM (Saturday) - E9 (LPN) documented in R79's EMR progress note, .Resident vomited again a large amount of brown colored vomit. Resident with change in LOC .order to send to ER via 911 .Emergency contact [F1] notified. 4/14/25 1:32 PM - A review of R79's EMR revealed F1 (R79's responsible party) was listed as the Emergency Contact #1. 4/15/25 10:14 AM - A review of R79's transfer notice, dated 4/7/25 (Monday) and signed by E10 (Admissions Director), failed to document to whom the notice of transfer was presented. 4/15/25 12:03 PM - During an interview, E10 stated, The bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R136) out of forty-three sampled residents, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment after R136 had a significant change in status. Findings include: Review of R136's clinical record revealed: 11/7/24 - R136 was admitted to the facility. 12/6/24 - R136 was admitted to hospice care. 1/2/25 - C2 (consultant NP) entered an order into R136's EMR, Hospice [local hospice service] every shift. This was twenty-seven days after R136 was admitted to a hospice service. 4/9/25 1:44 PM - A review of R136's EMR MDS schedule revealed there was no significant change MDS completed within fourteen days of R136's hospice admission. 4/10/25 11:02 AM - In a telephone interview, C1 (hospice office staff) confirmed. [R136] was admitted to our hospice service on 12/6/2024. 4/10/25 11:27 AM - During an interview, E4 (Business Office Manager) confirmed, [R136] went on hospice care on 12/6/24. 4/10/25 1:23 PM - During an interview, E11 (RNAC) confirmed that R136's MDS for a significant change was completed on 1/3/25, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R188) out of three residents reviewed for discharge the facility failed implement a discharge planning process that prepared the resident/RP to effectively transition to post-discharge care. Findings include: The facility policy on transfer and discharge undated indicated, Anticipated transfers or discharges - A post discharge plan of care that is developed with the participation of the resident and the residents representative which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. Review of R188's clinical record revealed: 5/2/24 - R188 was admitted to the facility. 5/3/24 - A care plan for discharge documented that R188 expressed wish for discharge to home. 5/3/24 12:34 PM - A social work progress note written by E6 (SW) in R188's clinical record documented, Resident is short term care at our facility. Resident will be discharged back to prior living arrangement once therapy is completed. The note did not document R188's actual discharge date . 5/9/24 - An admission MDS assesment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and a review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three sampled residents reviewed abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse. Findings include: Cross refer to F610 The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation last updated, May 2024 indicated, .Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse . Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 1/2/25 - R1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease. 1/3/24 - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was completed for R1 and showed a score of 8 out of 15 indicating that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. 1/13/25 11:57 AM - During an interview, E7 (CNA) stated that on 1/5/25 F1 reported to her that a staff member was being mean to R1. E7 further stated that R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three sampled residents for investigating an allegation of abuse, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse and investigate an allegation of abuse. Findings include: Cross refer to F609 The facility policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation last updated, May 2024 indicated, . An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur . Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 1/2/25 - R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. 1/3/24 - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was completed for R1 and showed a score of 8 out of 15 indicating that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. 1/13/25 11:43 AM - During an interview E6 (LPN) stated that on 1/5/25, F1 reported that a staff was inappropriate to R1. E6 stated that E8 (Supervisor) did not request that they write a statement. 1/13/25 11:57 AM - During an interview E7 (CNA) stated that on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a manner that prevents food borne illness to the residents. Findings include: 5/9/24 9:35 AM - During a tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed E48 (Dietary Services Manager) test the sanitizer level of the solution in two red sanitizing buckets. When E48 tested the sanitizing solution in both buckets, the test strips from each of the two buckets indicated that the level of chemical concentration in the buckets was not at a sufficient level to provide proper sanitization. 5/9/24 9:42 AM - A container of dry rice was spilled on the floor near the sink in the kitchen and left for over an hour. 5/9/24 10:27 AM - Observation of nourishment refrigerator in the Aspen unit revealed an opened carton of Nutritional Shake that was undated. The instructions on the carton indicate that once opened, any remaining product should be discarded after four (4) days. 5/9/24 11:53 AM - Observation of nourishment refrigerator in the Seaside Unit revealed an opened bottle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five (R2, R32, R55, R88 and R120) out of five sampled residents for care plan timing and revision, the facility failed to have input from all required interdisciplinary team (IDT) members at the residents' care plan meetings. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Plans, last reviewed 4/24, indicated 4. The comprehensive care plan will be prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes, but is not limited to: a. The attending physician or non-physician practitioner designee involved in the resident's care, if the physician is unable to participate in the development of the care plan. b. A registered nurse with responsibility for the resident. c. A nurse aide with responsibility for the resident. d. A member of the food and nutrition services staff. e. The resident and the resident's representative, to the extent practicable. f. Other appropriate staff or professionals in disciplines as determined by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident. Examples include, but are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. Findings include: 1. 5/9/24 10:49 AM - Laundry Aide (E41) was observed placing soiled laundry into the washing machine using ungloved hands. An interview revealed that E41 was not aware of safe handling practices for general soiled laundry or for laundry belonging to residents who were on various types of precautions due to illness. 2. A facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program with a revision date of 1/2024 documented This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a .sanitary .environment to help prevent the development and transmission of .infection . Review of R113's clinical record revealed: 9/1/23 - R113 was admitted to the facility. 5/20/24 9:10 AM - During an interview, R113 stated on 10/18/23 E24 (CNA) was cleaning out the toilet bowl from her bedside commode over the sink in her room which is located opposite the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to promote R18's dignity by keeping R18's urinary collection bag in a privacy bag. Findings include: Review of R18's clinical record revealed: 12/13/20 - R18 was admitted to the facility. 3/26/24 - A significant change MDS indicated R18 has an indwelling urinary catheter. 5/9/24 10:06 AM - An observation of R18 sitting by the nurses station and the urine collection bag was uncovered. 5/10/24 1:16 PM - An observation of R18 sitting by the nurses station and the urine collection bag was uncovered. 5/13/24 9:09 AM - An observation of R18 sitting by the nurses station and the urine collection bag was uncovered. 5/14/24 2:13 PM - An interview with E36 (CNA) confirmed R18's urinary collection bag was covered at this time and confirmed the privacy bag was put in place today. 5/20/24 1:35 PM - Findings were reviewed with E2 (DON), E4 (Consultant), and E21 (Corporate Clinical Nurse).
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, it was determined that for one (R65) out of one sampled resident reviewed for choices and preferences, the facility failed to accommodate R65's preference for showers. Findings include: Review of R65's clinical record revealed: 6/2/20 - R65 was admitted to the facility. 11/30/23 - A significant change MDS assessment revealed that R65 was dependent for transfers and showering and also revealed it was very important for R65 to be able to chose a bath or a shower. 5/9/24 11:33 AM - An interview with R65 revealed that R65 has not had a shower or washed her hair since September 2023. R65 stated that staff told her the bariatric shower bed was broken and she was unable to shower. A review of CNA documentation from August 2023, September 2023, October 2023, November 2023, December 2023, January 2024, February 2024, March 2024, April 2024, and May 2024 revealed that R65 has been only receiving bed baths from staff. 5/14/24 10:57 AM - An interview with E19 (RN) revealed that she was unaware of R65's preference for showers and could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for three (R18, R65 and R116 ) out of six residents reviewed for Advance Directives, the facility failed to offer an opportunity to formulate an advance directive. Findings include: 1. Review of R18's clinical record revealed: 12/13/20 - R18 was admitted to the facility. 3/26/24 - A significant change MDS revealed R18 was cognitively intact with a BIMs score of 15. 5/9/24 10:06 AM - An interview with R18 confirmed the facility did not offer to assist in formulating an advanced directive for him upon admission. 5/13/24 - A review of the electronic medical records lacked evidence that R18 had an advanced directive on file. 5/14/24 11:47 AM - An interview with E1 (NHA) confirmed that R18 did not have an advanced directive and was not previously offered to formulate one upon admission. 2. Review of R65's clinical record revealed: 6/2/20 - R65 was admitted to the facility. 2/29/24 - A quarterly MDS revealed that R65 was cognitively intact with a BIMs score of 15. 5/9/24 10:42 AM - An interview with R65 confirmed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for one (R80) out of two reviewed for Personal Property, the facility failed to maintain evidence demonstrating the result of R80's grievance regarding her missing personal items. The facility grievance policy also lacked documentation a specific process for how the resident/family were informed of the results of the grievance investigation. Findings include: Resident and Family Grievance Policy .1. Director of Social Services has been designated as the Grievance Official . 4. Grievance may be voiced in the following forums: a. Verbal complaint to a staff member of Grievance Official . Review of the facility Resident and Family Grievance Policy revealed the policy lacked a documented, specific process for how the resident/ family were informed of the results of the grievance investigation. 1/14/24 - R80 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, end stage renal disease, diabetes and difficulty walking. 5/10/24 10:53 AM - During an interview, R80 stated that she (R80) was transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of R46's clinical record revealed: 9/11/15 - R46 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to anxiety. 5/7/24 - An quarterly MDS revealed that R46 had no behavioral occurrences during the review period. 5/2024 - A review of the CNA behavior flow sheet revealed that R46 had verbal aggression from 5/1/24 to 5/7/24. 5/16/24 10:35 AM - An interview with E37 (RNAC) revealed that she is not responsible for the section documenting the behaviors in the MDS. 5/16/24 10:42 AM - Interview with E7 (SW) confirmed that social services is responsible for documenting the behavior section of the MDS. E7 confirmed that R46 had documented behaviors and the MDS was inaccurate. 3. Review of R98's clinical record revealed: 7/24/23 - R98 was admitted to the facility. 4/25/24 - A quarterly MDS revealed that R98 had no behavioral occurrences during the review period. 4/2024 - 5/2024 - A review of the CNA behavior flow sheet revealed that R98 had verbal and physical aggression from 4/18/24 to 4/25/2024. 5/16/24 10:42 AM - Interview with E7 (SW) confirmed that social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for four (R2, R28, R46 and R116) out of six residents reviewed for PASARR, the facility failed to ensure that a referral for a PASARR screening was completed. Findings include: 1. Review of R2's clinical record revealed: 12/1/21 - R2 was admitted to the facility. 8/4/22 - A review of R2's medical record revealed that R2 had a PASRR level 1 that indicated the following: The Level 1 screen indicates that a PASRR disability is not present because of the following reason: A neurocognitive disorder/dementia is primary and progressed . 6/21/23 - A diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms was added to R2's diagnoses, yet there was no request for an updated PASRR since the one completed in 2022. 5/13/24 11:07 AM - S1 (PASRR State Authority) confirmed that a resident review PASRR should have been completed due to this new mental health diagnosis as it suggested a new primary mental illness. 5/14/24 approximately 11:50 AM - An interview, E7 (Social Services Director) and E14 (Social Work…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R47) out of six residents sampled for PASARR review, the facility failed to provide evidence that a Delaware State PASARR was obtained prior to admission. Findings include: Review of R47's clinical record revealed: 12/15/15 - R47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to major depressive disorder. 9/19/16 - R47 was diagnosed with delusional disorder, anxiety disorder and mood disorder due to unknown physiological condition. 2023 - 2024 - A review of clinical records lacked evidence of a level I PASARR and a referral for update to the State PASARR authority. 5/17/24 1:15 PM- An interview with E7 (SW) confirmed that R47 was admitted without a PASARR level I or any PASARR review and will submit one today. E7 confirmed that she contacted the State PASARR authority and a level I was not on file. 5/20/24 1:35 PM - Findings were reviewed with E2 (DON), E4 (Consultant), and E21 (Corporate Clinical Nurse).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R40 and R106) out of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder, the facility failed to develop a person centered care plan to address incontinence. Findings include: 1. Review of R40's clinical record revealed: 1/23/20 - R40 was admitted to the facility. 2/6/24 - An admission assessment documented R40 was cognitively intact , always incontinent of bowel, bladder was not rated, and no toileting plan initiated. 4/30/24 - A quarterly MDS documented R40 was cognitively intact, always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and no toileting plan in place. 5/10/24 - Review of R40's care plan revealed a lack of evidence that a person centered care plan with interventions was developed to address R40's incontinence. 5/13/24 9:23 AM - During an interview, E39 (LPN) confirmed that R40 is incontinent of bowel and bladder she calls for help when she needs to be changed. 5/13/24 approximately 11:30 AM - During an interview E48 (RN/UM) confirmed R40's care plan lacked evidence that a person centered care plan was developed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for one (R3) out of four residents reviewed for Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure that R3's care met accepted, professional standards. The nurses documented signing out multiple medications as being administered via the oral route when in fact, the medications were being given via the enteral route due to R3 being NPO. Findings include: Nursing Rights of Medication Administration . It is the standard during nursing education to receive instruction on a guide to clinical medication administration and upholding patient safety known as the five rights or five R's of medication administration .The traditional five rights in traditional sequence include: right drug, right patient, right dose, right route, and right time. National Library of Medicine, September 4, 2023. Review of R3's clinical record revealed: 7/5/18 - R3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, multiple sclerosis. 2/14/24 - R3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that for four (R18, R54, R65, and R79) out of six residents reviewed for ADLs, the facility failed to ensure ADLs were provided to dependent residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R18's clinical record revealed: 12/13/20 - R18 was admitted to the facility. 3/26/24 - A significant change MDS revealed that R18 was dependent for toileting hygiene which includes perineal hygiene and using the toilet, commode or urinal. R18 was also dependent for chair to bed to chair transfer. R18 has a BIMS score of 15 and is alert and oriented. 5/9/24 10:56 AM - An interview with R18 revealed that he has been up in his chair since 6:00 AM and requested for his CNA to change him. R18 stated, She told me I have to wait until after lunch to be changed. 5/9/24 12:56 PM - An observation of R18 following the CNA to his room to receive care. 5/9/24 - A review of the CNA documentation flow sheet revealed that E43 (CNA) only provided perineal hygiene once during the shift. 5/9/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. Review of R397's clinical record revealed: 10/26/23 - R397 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including type II diabetes and morbid obesity due to excess calories. 10/27/23 12:30 PM - A physician's order was written for Humalog quick pen inject 25 units intramuscularly three times a day for diabetes. 10/28/23 - A care plan was written for potential/alteration in Nutritional status related to a need for therapeutic, fluid restricted diet secondary to DM, cardiac dx, morbid obesity. Expected weight variances related to diuretic use. Interventions included record percent of each meal and/or supplement consumed and Record weight and notify physician, patient, family or significant other of any significant change as needed. 11/3/23 to 11/7/23 - A review of the CNA task sheet revealed that R397's meal consumption was documented as 0% from 6 PM on 11/4/23 through 6 PM on 11/7/23. 11/7/23 12:30 PM - A physician's order was written for Humalog quick pen inject 20 units intramuscularly three times a day for diabetes. Blood glucose check revealed a blood glucose level of 99 mg/dL.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for one (R3) out of four residents reviewed for Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure that R3's monthly medication review was completed. Findings include: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) Policy- the drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the resident's medical chart . 7/5/18 - R3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, multiple sclerosis. 2/14/24 - R3 was admitted to the hospital for an altered mental status. 3/1/24- While hospitalized , R3 underwent placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG- a feeding tube) for a diagnosis of malnutrition/failure to thrive. 3/7/24 - R3 was re-admitted to the facility. 3/7/24 10:26 PM - E15 (RN Nursing supervisor) entered orders for acetaminophen, atorvastatin, bisacodyl, cholecalciferol, clopidogrel, cyanocobalamin, labetolol, losartan, Maalox, metformin, milk of magnesium, pantoprozole, polyethylene glycol and senna. All fourteen medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. Review of R47's clinical record revealed: 12/15/15 - R47 was admitted to the facility. 1/11/16 - A care plan was initiated for R47's use of anticoagulant therapy with an intervention of observing and monitoring for side effects such as blood in urine/stool, gums/nose bleeding, bruising. 10/21/22 - A physician's order for R47 was written for Pradaxa capsule (anticoagulant) one capsule by mouth twice a day related to chronic atrial fibrillation. 8/2023 - A review of the August MAR revealed no documentation related to adverse effects of anticoagulant therapy. 5/20/24 9:27 AM - An interview with E38 (UM) confirmed adverse effects were not being monitored for R47. 4. Review of R98's clinical record revealed: 7/24/23 - R98 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, concurrent. 4/25/24 - A quarterly MDS revealed R98 is prescribed an antidepressant. 5/2024 - A review of R98's MAR revealed a lack of monitoring for adverse effects of trazodone. 5/20/24 9:27 AM - An interview with E38 (UM) confirmed R98 was prescribed trazodone and confirmed lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to receive and document narcotic medications per professional standards of care. Findings include: Review of R65's clinical record revealed: 6/2/20 - R65 was admitted to the facility. 4/4/24 11:15 AM - A physician's order was written for oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) give one tablet by mouth every eight hours. 5/17/24 - A review of R65's narcotic count verification sheets revealed that for the months of November 2023, December 2023, January 2024, February 2024, March 2024, and April 2024 the verification sheets lacked evidence of date, time, and a nurse's signature of receipt. 5/20/24 9:27 AM - An interview with E38 (RN UM) confirmed the narcotic count verification sheets lacked the date, time, and a nurse's signature. 5/20/24 1:35 PM - Findings were reviewed with E2 (DON), E4 (Consultant), and E21 (Corporate Clinical Nurse).
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined, for one (R79) out of one resident sampled for laboratory services, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering medical practitioner of laboratory results that fell outside of clinical reference ranges. Findings include: Review of R79's clinical record revealed: 1/2/20 - R79 was admitted to the facility. 5/9/24 9:47 AM - In an interview with R79 revealed he had pain when urinating and the facility collected urine this morning for analysis and culture. 5/10/24 3:49 PM - A review of lab results revealed that R79 was positive for a urinary tract infection. The culture was still pending at this time. 5/11/24 (Saturday) 2:52 PM - A review of lab results revealed the urine sample from R79 was positive for growth. 5/13/24 (Monday) - A physicians order was written for Bactrim DS (antibiotic) by mouth daily for urinary tract infection. 5/14/24 11:04 AM - An interview with E39 (LPN) confirmed if lab results posted during weekend hours and were out of range the on call provider should be notified of the results. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with professional standards and practices, that medical records for two (R40 and R106) out of five residents of the investigative sampled residents were accurate. Findings include: Review of R40's clinical record revealed: 1/23/24 - R40 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, and depression. 2/22/24 - E8 (NP) documented in R40's electronic medical record (EMR), Risperdal (an anti-psychotic agent) 1 mg (milligram)- Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for total 5 mg and Risperdal 4 mg - Give 1 tablet at bedtime for total 5 mg. 5/16/24 12:45 PM - During an interview, E1(NHA) confirmed that R40's Risperdal orders in the EMR did not contain a diagnosis. 5/20/24 1:35 PM - Findings were reviewed with E2 (DON), E4 (Consultant), and E21 (Corporate Clinical Nurse). 2. Cross Refer F689 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R294) out of one sampled resident reviewed for reporting of alleged violations, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and immediately report an injury of unknown source. Findings include: 10/11/2023 - Resident was admitted to facility status post C2-T1 fusion and C2-C7 laminectomy on 10/3/23. 11/1/23 6:18 AM - A wound care note written by E40 (NP) revealed the following: This is the first assessment of R294's surgical wounds by me. Patient reports hearing a popping/crack sound yesterday during a transfer but did not report it to staff. Her shirt and bed linens were soaked in blood at the time of my exam. Significant surgical dehiscence to the mid upper back wound was found on exam 911 was called by staff nurse for immediate referral to the hospital. 11/1/23 11:30 AM - A nursing note revealed: Patient resting in bed at start of shift. Tolerated meal and all medication as prescribed. Resident voiced no c/o (complaints of) pain. Resident transferred to hospital for dehiscence of surgical site…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, as indicated, it was determined that for one (R294) out of one sampled resident for investigate/correct alleged violation, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown source. The facility policy on Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation last reviewed on 4/2/24 indicated the following: B. Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation .3. Investigating different types of alleged violations; 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations; 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause; and 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. 10/11/2023 - Resident was admitted to facility status post C2-T1 fusion and C2-C7 laminectomy. 11/1/23 6:18 AM - A wound care note written by E40 (NP) revealed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R297) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care the facility failed to properly administer oxygen. Findings include: Review of R297's clinical record revealed: 2/21/24 - R297 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of emphysema (a chronic lung disease causes shortness of breath). 2/23/24 - A care plan documented R297 is at risk for respiratory impairment related to congestive heart failure (the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), emphysema. Interventions included: - elevate the head of the bed. - evaluate lung sounds and vital signs, report any abnormalities to the physician. - labs per physician orders. - obtain pulse oximetry (measures blood oxygen saturation levels - desired range 94% to 100%) and report abnormal findings. 2/24/24 - A nursing progress note documented that R297 was having breathing difficulties and E19 (RN/Sup UM) placed a non-rebreather mask (enables delivery of high concentrations of oxygen) on R297 and set the flow rate to 4L/minute (correct flow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for two (R3 and R294) of five sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure the medical care of the resident was supervised by the physician regarding the evaluation of administration of medications by a PEG tube (a feeding tube) and the provision of care for a surgical wound. Findings include: 1. 10/11/23 - Resident admitted to facility status post C2-T1 fusion and C2-C7 laminectomy. 5/15/24 11:59 AM - In an interview, E9 (NP) stated that whoever does the resident's admission would enter wound care and then wound care NP's would then follow the resident. E9 stated that when surgical glue is used, it doesn't require any overt treatment plan, but staff would still need to ensure that the wound was still intact. E9 would expect the cervical collar to be removed daily for skin inspection. E9 stated that the surgeon drives the care for surgical wounds and facility providers would not make these orders. 5/16/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all staff employ hygienic practices, ensure the safe storage of food and beverages, and ensure food storage and preparation equipment is kept clean. Findings include: 4/03/23 8:32 AM - During the initial tour of the Kitchen, the Surveyor observed significant amounts of food crumbs, dried food particles and other small pieces of debris on the floor and shelves of the walk-in refrigerator. 4/03/23 9:25 AM - During a follow-up visit to the Kitchen, the Surveyor observed a foil covered tray with large amounts of food debris on it under an oven, a damaged support pad under the sanitizer delivery tube above the third compartment of the three (3) compartment sink and several areas of cracked and peeling paint adjacent to the three (3) compartment sink and the cooking equipment. 4/03/23 11:10 AM - During a follow-up visit to the Kitchen, the Surveyor observed a staff person enter the Kitchen to assist with serving lunch. The staff member did not have a hair net on. When the staff person was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation of one out of two units toured, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. Findings include: 4/6/23 1:37 PM - An observation on the Sierra unit revealed the following: black matter in the shower stall to the back right, black matter on the shower curtain, and a brown substance caking up the drain. 4/10/23 9:24 AM - An interview with E18 (Housekeeping) revealed there was not a set schedule to clean the shower rooms, however, E18 said that the showers could be cleaned daily. Observation in the shower room with E18 confirmed there was mildew and mold in the shower, there was build up around the drain, and build up on the grout. Furthermore, E18 added that the shower room needs to be scrubbed up. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), and E3 (Regional Nurse) on 4/11/23, at approximately 1:30 PM.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R49) out of three residents reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of the residents transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Review of R49's clinical record revealed: R49 was transferred to the hospital on 3/8/23 - 3/9/23 and then again on 3/23/23 - 3/25/23. 3/31/23 - E7 (SSD) sent an email of monthly transfer notices to the Ombudsman's office. R49's transfers were not listed on the notice. During an interview on 4/10/23 at 1:48 PM, E7 confirmed the finding. E7 reported she was unaware of the requirement to notify the Ombudsman of residents transferred to the hospital and was only providing notice of residents who were discharged . Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), and E3 (Regional Nurse) on 4/11/23, at approximately 1:15 PM.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R98) out of five sampled residents for ADL's (activities of daily living), the facility failed to provide oral hygiene and grooming of facial hair for a resident that required extensive assistance. Findings include: A facility policy and procedure titled, ADL Care undated, documented: To gather detailed information that will help to develop a plan of care that is appropriate for the resident in their ADL care; the process is continuous from admission and continues until the resident is discharged . 4. Grooming and Dressing includes: As you provide the resident with personal care needs, you should note .b. Assistance needed with bathing, hair, and nail care, dressing and undressing, mouth care. Review of R98's clinical record revealed: 2/1/21 - R98 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disorder of the nervous system that affects movement or a disorder of the brain that leads to shaking (tremors) and difficulty in walking, movement, and coordination).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other documentation, it was determined that for one (R128) out of one resident reviewed for skin conditions, the facility failed to initiate timely treatment to R128's pinky toe. Findings include: Review of R128's record revealed the following: 1/19/23 - R128 was admitted to the facility. 1/19/23 - An admission MDS revealed that R128 was severely cognitively impaired, totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and eating, requiring extensive assistance of one person. 1/20/23 10:49 PM - An SBAR documented that R128 had a fluid filled blister on the right pinky toe. The facility lacked evidence of initiating a treatment to R128's right foot from 1/20/23 to 1/22/23, despite the above notification to the Physician. 1/22/23 - A treatment order was initiated for skin prep to both feet for blisters every shift. 1/24/23 8:39 AM - A review of progress notes revealed that R128 was evaluated by E25 (WCNP) who documented, Right lateral foot fluid filled vesicle, left lateral foot fluid filled vesicle with what appears to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R15) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to monitor the residents dialysis catheter. Findings include: 6/12/21 - R15 was admitted to the facility. 6/14/21 - A care plan initiated for R15's dependency on hemodialysis revealed that the AV fistula (dialysis catheter in arm) should be checked per Physician's order and any abnormalities are to be reported to the Physician. 4/6/23 - A review of R15's Physicians orders lacked evidence of an order to check R15's dialysis catheter. 4/6/23 10:35 AM - An interview with R15 revealed that staff do not assess the dialysis catheter before leaving the facility or upon return from dialysis. 4/6/23 10:40 AM - An interview with E16 (LPN) confirmed that staff do not assess the dialysis catheter pre and post dialysis. 4/6/23 10:50 AM - An interview with E17 (LPN UM) confirmed there was no Physician's order to assess the dialysis catheter. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), and E3 (Regional Nurse) on 4/11/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interview, it was determined that for six (E8, E9, E10, E11, E12 and E21) out of six employee evaluations reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that performance evaluations were conducted every 12 months. Findings include: 1. E8 was due for an evaluation on 11/3/22 and it was not conducted until 2/25/23. 2. E9 was due for an evaluation on 8/14/22 and it was not conducted until 1/29/23. 3. E10 was due for an evaluation on 7/2/22 and it was not conducted until 2/3/23. 4. E11 was due for an evaluation on 8/6/22 and it was not conducted until 2/1/23. 5. E12 was due for an evaluation on 9/10/22 and it was not conducted until 2/3/23. 6. E21 was due for an evaluation on 4/7/22 and it was not conducted until 2/1/23. During an interview with E13 (Human Resources) on 4/11/23 at 10:00 AM, E13 acknowledged that the six performance evaluations were late. Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2, (DON) and E3 (Regional Nurse) during the exit conference, beginning at approximately 1:15 PM.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Medication pass observations identified three (3) errors out of twenty-six (26) opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.5%. Findings include: Cross refer to F760 Review of R116's clinical record revealed: 1/2/23 - A Physician's order was written for Galantamine Hydrobromide 8 mg, give two tablets (tabs) by mouth daily related to Alzheimer's Disease. 1/3/23 - Physician's orders were written for Potassium Chloride 20 MEQ Extended Release, give one tab by mouth daily for nutritional supplementation and for Levetiracetam 500 mg, give one tab by mouth twice a day for seizures. 4/5/23 9:00 AM - During a random medication pass observation, E20 (RN) administered the above medications to R116 after crushing the medications. 4/5/23 10:30 AM - During an interview, E20 confirmed that the medication instructions for Galantamine Hydrobromide, Potassium Chloride Extended Release and Levetiracetam stated the medications should not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one (R116) out of eight (8) sampled residents reviewed for medication (med) review was free from significant medication errors. During a med pass observation, R116 was administered three oral meds in a crushed form that did not follow the manufacturer's instructions to not crush the meds prior to administration. Findings include: Galantamine Hydrobromide tablet is an enteric coated tablet; crushing enteric coated tablets releases the drug into the stomach where it may be destroyed by stomach acid and not be absorbed into the body. Potassium Chloride is an Extended Release tablet, designed to slowly release the drug in the body over an extended period of time instead of all at once when crushed; high potassium levels may cause life threatening heart rhythm problems, muscle weakness and/or paralysis. Crushing Levetiracetam tablets can produce a bad taste in the mouth. Review of R116's clinical record revealed: R116…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R98) out of two sampled residents for dental services, the facility failed to assist the resident in obtaining routine dental services. Findings include: A facility policy and procedure titled, Resident Dental Care, undated, documented: It is the policy of this facility, in accordance with residents' needs, to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under State Plan) and emergency dental care. 1. The dental needs of each resident are identified through the physical assessment and are addressed in each resident's plan of care. 1. Oral/dental status shall be documented according to assessment findings. R98's clinical record revealed: 2/1/21 - R98 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disorder of the nervous system that affects movement or a disorder of the brain that leads to shaking (tremors) and difficulty in walking, movement and coordination). 4/3/23 10:00 AM - During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R7) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication administration, the facility failed to properly identify the appropriate indication for which the medication Tamsulosin was being administered. Findings include: 1/3/23 - admission to the facility with a history of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, unspecified. 4/6/23 untimed - Review of R7's chart revealed that R7 was prescribed Tamsulosin HCl Oral Capsule 0.4 MG, Give 0.4 mg by mouth at bedtime for Benign Prostate Take 1 capsule (0.4 mg total) by mouth once a day after breakfast. 4/6/23 2:20 PM - During an interview with E19 (LPN), he/she stated that R7 was prescribed Tamsulosin for benign prostate. The Surveyor said to E19 (LPN), But this resident is a woman, noting that females do not have a prostate. E19 (LPN) then confirmed benign prostate was the wrong indication for R7 to receive this medication. 4/11/2023 approximately 1:30 PM - Findings were reviewed at the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (Regional Nurse).
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide one (R98) out five sampled residents for immunizations, an informed consent for four administered doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Findings include: A facility policy and procedure titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 10/2022, documented: The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. 8. COVID-19 Immunization: c. Education about the vaccine, risks, benefits, and potential side effects will be given to residents or resident representatives and staff prior to offering the vaccine. R98's clinical record revealed: - 6/30/21 Dose 1 SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) Moderna US Inc. 053C21A; - 7/28/21 Dose 2 SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) Moderna US Inc. 006D21A; - 3/15/22 Moderna Booster 033K21; - 8/16/22 Pfizer Booster. 4/10/23 1:30 PM - During a review of R98's immunization record, E24 (LPN) confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that for three out of three medication carts observed the facility failed to ensure that opened medications were labeled with an open date. Findings include: 1. 4/8/25 6:25 AM - An observation and inspection of the Sierra Unit B cart revealed four liquid medications that were opened and undated. The finding was immediately confirmed by E18 (LPN). 2. 4/8/25 6:33 AM - An observation and inspection of the Sierra Unit A cart revealed two liquid medications that were opened and undated. The finding was immediately confirmed by E18 (LPN). 3. 4/8/25 6:53 AM - An observation and inspection of the Seaside Unit A cart revealed four liquid medications that were opened and undated. The finding was immediately confirmed by E19 (LPN). 4/17/25 1:45 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON).
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$94,156 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-04-17
- $76,811 — penalty dated 2024-05-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRESTIGE HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVPA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/01/2025 |
| COPPER DE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2025 |
| GOLD DE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2025 |
| SILVER DE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2025 |
| STAR DE I HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2025 |
| STAR DE I TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2025 |
| RASTOGI, RITU | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ROCHESTER, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Delaware Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 085020. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.