Liberty Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 193 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 156.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on three of five nursing units. (Station 1, Station 2, Station 3) Findings include: Observations on January 13, 2026, from 9:45 a.m. through 1:00 p.m. and on January 14, 2026, from 8:00 a.m. through 12:00 p.m., revealed the following: The Station 1 dining room had dust and a black substance on ceiling tiles. The Station 1 activities room door didn't latch. The Station 1 central bathroom toilet ran continuously. The bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] had a loose doorknob. The half wall by the nurses' station in Station 2 had chipped paint along the length of the top of the wall. The ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER] had dark stains and chipped paint There was a hole in the ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The window blind in room [ROOM NUMBER] did not close and there was no curtain on the window. The ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER] over wardrobes had cracks and stains. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident's capability to self-administer medications for one of 36 sampled residents. (Resident 121)Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, last reviewed February 13, 2025, revealed that a resident was only to self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team had determined which medications may be self-administered safely. The resident's preference would be documented on the appropriate form and placed in the medical record. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment were recorded on the Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form which was placed in the resident's medical record. When the interdisciplinary team determined that bedside or in-room storage of medications would be a safety risk to other residents, the medications of residents permitted to self-administer would be stored in the medication cart or medication room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the call bell was accessible for one of 36 sampled residents. (Resident 14)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), history of stroke, limited range of motion, and chronic pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated January 12, 2026, revealed Resident 14 was alert and oriented, able to communicate needs to staff, and had limited range of motion to the left arm and leg. Review of the care plan revealed Resident 14 was at risk for falls related to a history of falls and required a two person assist with transfers, mobility, and activities of daily living. The interventions included that staff were to keep the call bell within reach. Observations on January 14, 2026, at 10:15 a.m., and 1:00 p.m., and January 15, 2026, at 9:49 a.m., revealed that the call bell was not within Resident 14's reach. The call bell was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for three of 36 sampled residents. (Residents 20, 24, 147)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (kidney failure), diabetic retinopathy (damage to blood vessels in the eye), and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on December 11, 2025, indicated that the resident was alert and had a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) summary dated December 11, 2025, noted that the resident's vision problem was to be addressed in the care plan. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident's 20's vision problem were included in the current care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner on two of five nursing units. (Stations 2 and 5)Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Food: Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors, dated February 13, 2025, revealed that staff were to label foods that were intended for later consumption with the resident's name. Observation in the Station 2 resident nourishment room on January 14, 2026, at 12:25 p.m., revealed in the freezer there was one shrimp scampi meal and five popsicles that were not labeled with a name. In the refrigerator, there was a dish of pasta and meat sauce dated December 25, 2025. There was a store-bought container of chicken strips, an opened bottle of vegetable juice, and a container of beef and beans that were not labeled with a resident's name. Observation in the Station 5 resident nourishment room on January 14, 2026, at 8:40 a.m., revealed that there was an opened bottle of water, an opened container of ice cream cake, a bottle of green vegetable juice, and an opened package of frozen fruit bars…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the spread of infection for two of 36 sampled residents. (Resident 7 and 20) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed on February 13, 2025, revealed that staff were to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms for residents with specific diagnoses which included Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) in urine, even if the resident has been colonized. Staff were to post clear signage on the door or wall outside of the resident's room indicating the type of precautions, the required personal protective equipment to wear, and the high-contact resident care activities that required the use of gown and gloves, such as bathing/showering, providing hygiene, changing briefs and linens, and assistance with toileting to prevent the spread of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions and store food properly in the dietary department. Findings include: During an environmental tour of the dietary department on December 10, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., observations revealed the following: There was a large hole in the paneling on the back wall of the recycling area located in the dietary department. The convection ovens were soiled. The insides of the top and bottom oven doors were coated with grease. The bottom of the top oven was covered heavily with burnt debris and burnt food crumbs. There was a large metal scoop stored on the inside of the large bin that contained flour. There was debris on the floor alongside the wall near the steamer and dry goods bins. On the inside of the ice machine, there was a brown substance on parts of the lid. The brown substance was also on the left inside wall of the ice machine. There were five cracked floor tiles near the entrance way of the utility hallway that was located inside the dietary department. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of 33 sampled residents. (Resident 2) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included dementia, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had memory impairment and was dependent on staff for dressing. On November 10, 2024, a physician ordered for staff to apply compression stockings (Tubigrips) on bilateral legs for swelling. On December 10, 2024, at 11:45 a.m. and 12:44 p.m., and again on December 11, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. and 10:25 a.m., the resident was observed dressed and seated in her wheelchair in the dining room on the nursing unit without the Tubigrips in place. On December 11, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., the licensed practical nurse stated that staff was to put the Tubigrips on with morning care. In an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a working call bell for two of 33 sampled residents. (Residents 4, 142) Findings include: During a resident group meeting conducted on December 11, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., Resident 4 stated that when she activated the call bell from her bed, the light outside the door did not activate. Resident 142 stated that when he activated the call bell from his bed, there was no sound or light, and that he must yell for assistance. Observations on December 11, 2024, at 11:15 a.m., revealed that when Resident 4 activated the call bell from her bed, no light was observed outside of her door. At 11:35 a.m., Resident 142 activated the call bell from his bed; no sound or light was observed. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d) Nursing services.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of changes in clinical condition for one of three sampled residents. (Resident 3) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Notification of Changes, last reviewed November 1, 2023, revealed that staff were to notify the physician and resident representative if there was a change in clinical condition. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included dementia, difficulty walking, and osteoporosis. According to the pain evaluation documentation during May 2024, the resident had either no pain or a pain rated as a 1 on a scale of one to ten. On May 13, 2024, at 7:30 p.m., a nurse noted that the resident fell and was found on her left side. That night at 11:17 p.m., a nurse noted that the resident's pain was rated a 3. The following morning at 6:03 a.m., the nurse noted that the pain level increased to a 6. At 7:18 a.m., the nurse noted that the resident was having pain in her left hip when she moved. There…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESTIGE HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA