Park Lane Post Acute LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 505 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 298 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 63.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.26 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.41 to 0.89 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff and resident interview, observation, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's skin after the application of an elastic wrap for one out of six residents reviewed (Resident 37).Findings include: A review of Resident 37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a mandatory assessment of a resident's condition and care needs) dated April 20, 2026, revealed Resident 37 was moderately cognitively impaired and relied on staff for substantial assistance with personal care. Resident 37's diagnoses included pneumonia (a lung infection), acute respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the blood), pulmonary hypertension (a type of high blood pressure affecting the blood vessels in the lungs and the right side of the heart), and cardiomyopathy (enlargement of the heart muscle). Resident 37 was receiving diuretic medication (removes excess fluid from the body), opioid medication (a narcotic pain medication), antiplatelet medication (medication to prevent blood clots), anticonvulsant medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders for oxygen for one out of six residents reviewed (Resident 25).Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, undated, revealed the following: Oxygen is administered under orders of a provider, except in the case of an emergency where the resident [is] exhibiting signs and symptoms of respiratory distress.Review of Resident 25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a mandatory assessment of a resident's condition and care needs) dated March 11, 2026 revealed Resident 25 was moderately cognitively impaired and totally dependent on staff to complete care needs. Resident 25's diagnoses included lung cancer and chronic respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot deliver oxygen to the blood). Resident 25 was receiving antianxiety medication, hypnotic medication (medication for sleep), anticoagulant medication (medication to prevent blood clots), antibiotic medication (medication to treat infections), opioid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications ordered by physicians were available for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 5).Findings Include: A review of Resident 4's readmission notes dated April 8, 2026, at 10:28 p.m., revealed the resident was readmitted with a left hip fracture, post ORIF (Open Reduction and Internal Fixation- A two-part surgical procedure used to treat severe, displaced bone fractures by realigning the bone and securing it with hardware) to the left hip. A review of Resident 4's physician's order dated April 8, 2026, revealed Heparin Sodium (anticoagulant) injection solution one ml (milliliter) subcutaneously (medication injected into the fatty tissue layer between the skin and muscle) every eight hours for DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis- blood clot in the deep vein) prevention. A review of Resident 4's April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Heparin was not administered on the following dates/times: April 27, 2026, at 6:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m., and 10:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to practice infection control prevention and management for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 71).Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions, revised on March 16, 2026, revealed that facility staff will apply Transmission-Based Precautions, in addition to standard precautions, to residents who are known or suspected to be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents requiring additional controls to prevent transmission. The same policy revealed, healthcare personnel caring for residents on Contact Precautions wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident or potentially contaminated areas in the resident's environment. Donning personal protective equipment (PPE) upon room entry and discarding before exiting the room is done to contain pathogens, especially those…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical and pharmacy records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were made available for one of the two residents reviewed (Resident CL1).Findings include: Clinical records review revealed Resident CL1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of T11-T12 compression fracture. A review of the Physician's order (POS) dated November 26, 2025, revealed Lyrica (A medication used to treat nerve pain and seizures) 25 mg one capsule by mouth three times daily. The medication was scheduled at 9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 9:00 p.m. A review of the November 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that Resident CL1 was not administered Lyrica on November 27, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 9:00 p.m. A review of the nursing progress notes dated November 27, 2025, at 10:39 a.m., revealed Lyrica medication not yet in from pharmacy. A review of the nursing progress notes dated November 27, 2025, at 12:12 p.m., revealed Lyrica…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders and adequately monitor significant weight changes for three of eight residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents 18, 36 and 37). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Weight and Weight Change Management, last revised date unknown, revealed: Resident weights will be obtained to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident. Each resident will be weighed monthly or more frequently as deemed necessary by physician orders, Dietician, or IDT (interdisciplinary team) recommendation. Clinical records review revealed Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF-A weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD-Gradual loss of kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor behaviors and potential side effects for residents receiving anti-psychotic medications (psychiatric drugs used to treat symptoms of psychosis, like hallucinations and delusions) for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 18 and 25). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medications, with an effectivity date of January 14, 2025, revealed residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. The medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication. Further review of the same policy revealed that residents who receive an antipsychotic medication will have an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS- A test used to assess and monitor involuntary movements) test performed per facility policy. A review of Resident 18's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of staff being rough to the resident while providing care for one of the 19 residents reviewed (Resident 62). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, implemented on March 17, 2025, revealed that an investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occurs. Written procedures for investigations include the following: Identifying staff responsible for investigation; Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might know about the allegation; Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and the cause; and Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. A review of Resident 62's diagnosis list includes Spinal Stenosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure skin impairment identified from admission was thoroughly assessed and wound care recommendations from the wound physician were followed for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 59). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, implemented on January 14, 2025, revealed that the facility should establish and utilize a systematic approach for pressure injury prevention and management, including prompt assessment and treatment. Licensed nurses will conduct a full body skin assessment on all residents upon admission/readmission, weekly, and after any newly identified pressure injury. Findings will be documented in the medical record. Clinical records review revealed Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia (A late-onset neurodegenerative disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding administration of nutrition for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 317). Findings include: Review of Resident 317's Medical Diagnosis revealed, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition and chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the lungs cannot adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide, leading to low blood oxygen levels or high carbon dioxide levels). Clinical record review that patient was admitted to facility on May 8, 2025 with a tracheostomy (a surgical procedure where an opening (stoma) is created in the neck to access the trachea (windpipe), allowing for easier breathing) and PEG tube (a thin, flexible tube inserted directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall). Review of Resident 317's physicians order revealed an order dated May 8, 2025 for Enteral Feed Order one time a day Continuous Tube Feeding: Product: Nutren 1.5 At 60 ML/ Hour via PEG tube x 20hours/day Total Volume: 1200 mL (milliliter) Up at 4 pm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESTIGE HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA