No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Glen Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

801 East 16th Street, Berwick, PA 18603 · For profit - Corporation · 240 certified beds · (570) 759-5400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 759-5400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 20242 actual-harm citations$260,715 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $260,715 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
695 E 16th St · (570) 759-1833 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
500 Fowler Ave · (570) 520-4170 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1105 Chestnut St · (570) 759-1592 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Snyder Middleswarth Natural Area · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-06 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.9%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms34.3%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.0%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.7%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.6%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.1%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.9%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.8%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.681.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.351.181.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 157 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.8%CMS range 41.2–57.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 7.7–12.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.6–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
52.0%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 197.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-27)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse policy, clinical records and select investigative reports and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident 26) out of 35 sampled was free from physical abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident 24), which caused Resident 26 to fall and sustain a traumatic hematoma to the forehead and facial bruising. Findings included: A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, last reviewed by the facility April 15, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Physical Abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. A review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and investigative reports, observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary staff set-up and positioning assistance with eating as required by a resident to prevent an accident while eating resulting in a second degree burn for one (Resident 132) out of 35 residents sampled. Findings include: The American Burn Association ([NAME]) classifies burns by the depth of the wound: superficial skin injuries are classified as first-degree burns, partial-thickness skin injuries are classified as second-degree burns, and full-thickness skin injuries are classified as third-degree burns. According to the [NAME], in general, if a second-degree burn measures less than two to three inches (seven centimeters), it may be treated as a minor burn. A review of the facility policy titled Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors, implemented on April 15, 2023, indicated that it is the right of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medication for one resident (Resident 7) and by failing to ensure the consistent implementation of a physician-ordered therapeutic positioning device for one resident (Resident 4), for two of 36 residents reviewed.Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) the registered nurse (RN) is to carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health care team by exercising sound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of resident pantry areas and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain equipment and environmental surfaces in a clean and sanitary condition in areas used for food and ice service to prevent the potential for microbial growth in food and beverages, increasing the risk of foodborne illness and waterborne pathogens in four of four resident pantry areas (East, North, Spruce and [NAME] pantries). Findings include: Observation on February 26, 2026, at 10:25 AM of the resident food pantry located on the East Wing nursing unit revealed the ice machine's condensation drain hose (a hose that transports moisture produced by the ice machine to a floor drain) was visibly soiled with a black substance. The ice dispenser contained a buildup of orange and gray substance and white mineral deposits (hard residue left behind from water) within and around the dispenser opening where ice is dispensed. The pantry sink contained a used food thermometer that was visibly soiled with an orange substance. Observation on February 26, 2026, at 10:40 AM of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to afford a resident and their designated representative the right to participate in the development of the resident's plan of care for one resident out of 36 sampled residents (Resident 11).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Care Planning-Resident Participation, last reviewed by the facility on January 6, 2026, revealed it is the facility policy to support the resident's right to be informed of and participate in their care planning and treatment (implementation of care). The policy indicates the facility will notify the resident and/or resident representative of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment, and treatment alternatives or options. The facility will honor requests for care plan meetings and acknowledge requests for revisions to the person-centered plan of care. A clinical record review revealed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, clinical records, resident observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 199).Findings include: A clinical record review revealed resident 199 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of urinary incontinence (the loss of control over one's urine). A review of a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated December 30, 2025, revealed that Resident 199 did not experience any limitation in range of motion (ROM) (referring to the full movement of a joint) in the upper extremities. MDS section GG-0115 (section related to functional abilities, the ability to perform tasks and activities necessary for daily living) indicated Resident 199 did not experience any limitation in moving one's shoulders, arms, elbows, wrist,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of pre-admission records, facility clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that documented interim, person-centered approaches to address the resident's identified fall risk for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 14).Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lungs cannot deliver oxygen to the body). A review of Resident 14's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated November 6, 2025, revealed Resident 14 was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 3 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, investigative documentation provided by the facility, select facility policy, manufacturer guidelines, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate prevention and management of a pressure injury for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 9).Findings include: Review of the facility's Pressure Injury Prevention and Management policy, reviewed January 6, 2026, revealed that the facility shall establish and utilize a systematic approach for pressure injury prevention and management, including prompt assessment and treatment; intervening to stabilize, reduce, or remove underlying risk factors; monitoring the impact of the interventions; and modifying the interventions as appropriate. After completing a thorough assessment/evaluation, the interdisciplinary team shall develop a relevant care plan that includes measurable goals for prevention and management of pressure injuries with appropriate interventions. Interventions will be based on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently provide restorative nursing services as planned to maintain mobility to the extent possible for one resident out of 36 residents sampled (Resident 13).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Restorative Nursing Program, last reviewed by the facility on January 6, 2026, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide maintenance services (ongoing nursing support intended to preserve a resident's current physical abilities and prevent decline) and restorative services (structured nursing interventions designed to help a resident regain or improve functional abilities such as walking, transferring, or performing daily activities) designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level. The policy indicates that residents, as identified during the comprehensive assessment process, will receive services from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary antibiotics for one out of 36 residents sampled (Resident 141).Findings include: A review of Resident 141's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include mild neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance (a slight, noticeable decline in cognitive abilities that does not significantly interfere with daily independence and is accompanied by agitation, irritability or mood changes) and cerebral infarction (stroke). A nursing progress note dated January 20, 2026, indicated staff notified the physician of Resident 141's increased confusion and incontinence (the inability to control bladder or bowel function). The physician ordered STAT (immediate) laboratory testing, including a complete blood count (CBC, a blood test that measures the number and types of blood cells and can help identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by three residents out of 35 residents sampled (Residents 47, 48, and 140) and five out of nine residents interviewed during a resident group interview (Residents 10, 31, 49, 72, and 142). Findings include: A review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated February 11, 2025, revealed residents in attendance raised concerns regarding not being assisted out of bed to participate in activities. The residents indicated there was an issue with receiving staff assistance to get out of bed promptly. Also, residents in attendance raised concerns indicating call bells are not answered when residents ring for assistance. During a resident council meeting on March 19, 2025, at 10:00 AM, Residents 10, 31, 49,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and controlled drug records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate accounting and administration of controlled medications for two of 35 residents sampled (Residents 64 and 92). Finding include: A review of Resident 92's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated December 21, 2024, for Morphine Sulfate 15 mg (an opioid pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain), with instructions to administer one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for severe pain. A review of the controlled substance record for Resident 92's Morphine Sulfate 15 mg (schedule II opiate narcotic medication; schedule II drugs have a high potential for abuse) showed that nursing staff signed out doses of the medication on the following dates and times: February 2, 2025, at 4:15 PM February 4, 2025, at 4:00 PM February 5, 2025, at 2:00 PM February 18, 2025, (time illegible) February 21, 2025, at 5:50 PM March 3, 2025, at 4:40 PM However, a review of Resident 92's Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 35 sampled (Residents 2 and 183). Findings include: According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual (an assessment tool utilized to gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan, and the RAI also assists staff to evaluate goal achievement and revise care plans accordingly by enabling the facility to track changes in the resident's status) dated October 2024, Section A2105: Discharge Status indicates to review the medical record, including the discharge plan and discharge orders, for documentation of discharge location. This section indicates that if the resident is discharged to a private home, apartment, board and care, assisted living facility, group home, transition living, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address a resident's involuntary movements for one out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medication (Resident 10). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a condition in which an individual has a mix of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression, mania, and a milder form of mania called hypomania). A clinical record review revealed an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS- assessment tool used to screen for and assess the severity of tardive dyskinesia (TD), a movement disorder that can occur as a side effect of certain medications, particularly antipsychotics) dated September 23, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to consistently administer Oxygen (O2) as ordered for one out of 35 sampled residents (Resident 14). Findings included: Review of the facility Oxygen Administration Policy last reviewed April 17, 2024, indicated that oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the resident's goals and preferences. Oxygen is administered under the orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. In such case, oxygen is administered and orders for oxygen are obtained as soon as practicable when the situation is under control. A review of the clinical record of Resident 14 revealed admission to the facility on November 1, 2024, with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure (the heart muscle does not pump blood as well as it should). The resident had a current physician order initially dated December 16, 2024, for O2 at 2 liters per minute (L/min) continuous via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to timely follow up with required dental services for one Medicaid payor source resident out of 35 residents sampled (Resident 10). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD is a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe) and mild protein malnutrition (inadequate intake of food, particularly protein and calories, resulting in a deficit in expected weight for age or height). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated February 3, 2025, revealed that Resident 10 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to offer and/or provide the influenza immunization, unless the immunization was medically contraindicated or the resident had already been immunized, for one out of the five residents sampled (Resident 58). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic atrial fibrillation (a condition that causes the heart to beat irregularly and sometimes much faster than normal) and dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated March 6, 2025, revealed that Resident 58 is severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy and incident reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement adequate safety measures, including sufficient staff supervision, for a resident identified as at high risk for falls to prevent falls for one resident out of 35 sampled (Resident 115). Findings include: A facility policy titled Falls Prevention Program, last reviewed by the facility in April 2024, revealed that each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. The policy indicates the facility will provide interventions as directed by the resident's assessment, including but not limited to assistive devices, increased frequency of safety monitoring rounds, scheduled ambulation or toileting assistance, and therapy services referrals. A clinical record review revealed Resident 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, select investigative reports and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the failed to ensure the provision of care and services necessary to prevent a fall and maintain the physical health of one resident (Resident B1) out of two residents reviewed Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation last reviewed by the facility on April 15, 2024, revealed it is the facility's policy to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. The policy defines neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. A clinical record review revealed that Resident B1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for three residents out of 35 sampled (Resident 103, 58, and 404). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Type 2 diabetes and difficulty walking. A review of a bowel and bladder assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident is always incontinent of urine and feces. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed the resident is on a two hour check and change program to check for incontinence. A review of the current resident's plan of care revealed the resident's care plan failed to identify the resident's bowel and bladder incontinence and interventions to address the resident's concerns. A review of Resident 58's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility July 30, 2023, with diagnoses that included dementia with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to administer medication timely in accordance with physician's orders for one resident out of 35 sampled (Resident 161). Findings include: A facility policy titled Medication Administration, last reviewed by the facility in April 2024, revealed medications are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. The policy states that licensed nurses shall Administer medications within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician or resident preference. A clinical record review revealed Resident 161 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include end-stage renal disease (the final stage of kidney decline where the kidneys are no longer able to function to meet the body's needs). Further clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents receive appropriate services and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence for two out of 35 residents sampled (Residents 145 and 180). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dorsopathy (diseases of the spine and vertebral tissues accompanied by pain in the back) and morbid obesity (a chronic disease that's characterized by a body mass index of 40 or higher, or a body mass index of 35 or higher with obesity-related health issues). A Physical Therapy (PT) Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed discharge recommendations for Resident 145 to have a restorative range of motion program. Specifically, the recommendations include bilateral lower extremity range of motion in recline and sitting positions and daily out of bed to wheelchair and range of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy and investigative reports resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident was free from physical abuse out of 9 sampled residents (Resident C1). Findings including A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, last reviewed by the facility February 7, 2024, revealed that it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Physical Abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. A review of Resident C1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on July 15, 2022, with diagnoses, of Alzheimer's dementia [chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully develop and implement an abuse prohibition policy with corresponding written procedures to assure staff carry out the tasks necessary to fulfill required components for abuse prevention. Findings include, A review of a facility policy for, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation reviewed February 7, 2024 revealed guidelines to include: 1. The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that; a. Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. b. Establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations The abuse policy did not include Involuntary seclusion as a form of abuse or any definitions of the types of abuse included in the policy. Screening procedures included: A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference, and credential's checks shall be conducted on potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmacy services to assure consistent availability of routine prescribed pharmaceuticals and medications for four of nine residents reviewed (Residents B3, B4, B5, and C4). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications provided by facility during the survey of March 28, 2024, and dated as last reviewed by the facility August 2020, indicated that repeat medications (refills) are written on a medication reorder form or by peeling the reorder tab from the prescription label and placing it in the appropriate area on the medication reorder form provided by the pharmacy, or requested via the facility's EHR (Electronic Health Record) system. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident B3, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include diabetes. Current physician orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of the statement of deficiencies from the surveys ending February 6, 2024, and February 28, 2024, and the activities of facility's quality assurance committee and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement effective plans to correct quality deficiencies in pharmacy services, timely obtaining resident medications, and accurate clinical records to ensure that corrective action plans designed to improve the delivery of care and services were consistently implemented to correct and deter future quality deficiencies. Findings included: During the survey ending February 28, 2024, quality deficiencies were cited under the requirements for pharmacy services due to the facility's failure to timely obtain resident medications and clinical records for failing to maintain accurate and complete medical records reflecting the resident's experience in the facility. In response to these deficiencies, the facility developed a plan of correction to correct these deficient practices that included quality assurance monitoring plans to assure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely develop and implement a person-centered care plan to meet one resident's current needs for the use of an implantable cardiac devices for one of nine sampled residents (Resident B1). Findings including: Clinical record review revealed that Resident B1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include A-V block (atrioventricular block (AV block) is a disease of the electrical conduction system of the heart in which electrical impulses conduct from the cardiac atria to the ventricles through the atrioventricular node (AV node) more slowly than [NAME] and heart disease), implantable cardiac pacemaker and hypertensive chronic kidney disease with heart failure. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated February 7, 2024, revealed that Resident B1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select investigative reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records, according to professional standards of practice for one of nine sampled residents (Resident A1). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient record to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments, Clinical problems, Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient, Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patient's designated support person and other third parties. According to the Title…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and a review of employee personnel records it was determined that the facility failed to provide abuse prevention training to one employee out of five reviewed. (Employee 2). Findings include: During an interview with Employee 2 (agency LPN) on March 28, 2024 at 9:45 a.m she stated that this was the first shift she worked at the facility. Employee 2 stated that she was never trained on the facility's abuse prohibition policy prior to assuming her duties today. There was no documentation that Employee 2 was trained on the facility's abuse prohibition policies and procedures as part of staff orientation and training on the prohibition of all forms of abuse, neglect, and exploitation prohibition. Interview with the Administrator on March 28, 2024 at 11:15 a.m., confirmed that the facility had no written records to show that Employee 2 was trained on the facility's policy and procedures on as part of staff orientation and training before assuming job duties. 28 Pa. Code 201.20 (b) Staff development 28 Pa. Code 201.19 (7) Personnel policies and procedures

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of grievances lodged with the facility and select facility policy and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate timely and adequate efforts to resolve resident grievances for two residents out of 16 sampled. (Resident 2 and 11) Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Resident and Family Grievances revealed the staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form or assist the resident or family member to complete the form. The staff will forward the grievance form to the grievance official as soon as practicable. The grievance official takes steps to resolve the grievance and record information about the grievance and those actions on the grievance form. In accordance with the residents right to retain a written decision regarding his or her grievance, the grievance official will issue a written decision of the grievance to the resident or representative at the conclusion of the investigation. The written decision will include at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely care and necessary resident care supplies for effective incontinence management for one resident out of 16 sampled (Resident 2). Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Urinary and Bowel Incontinence last reviewed by the facility on October 3, 2023, indicated that it was the policy of the facility that once a resident was identified as incontinent, staff would develop a plan of care to manage issues with incontinence and provide the appropriate treatment and services to meet the resident's toileting needs. A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, congestive heart failure and above the knee amputation of the right leg and below the knee amputation of the left leg. The resident's plan of care for ADL (activities of daily living include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select facility policy and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement pharmacy procedures to consistent availability of routine prescribed medications for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Ordering and Receiving Non-Controlled Medications provided by facility on February 28, 2024, indicated that repeat medications (refills) are written on a medication reorder form or by peeling the reorder tab from the prescription label and placing it in the appropriate area on the medication reorder form provided by the pharmacy, or requested via the facility's EHR (Electronic Health Record) system. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include diabetes with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Review of current physician orders for Resident 8 revealed an order for Novolin 70/30 subcutaneous suspension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to expiration dates on pharmacy products stored in the central supply room. Findings include: Observations of the facility's central supply room on February 28, 2024, at 11:15 AM revealed one box, containing 5 bottles of Glucerna tube feeding, and another box containing 6 bottles, both had expired in [DATE]. There were 2 bags Nova Source Renal tube feeding formula that expired [DATE]. 16 bottles of hand sanitizer expired in [DATE]. An interview with Employee 5, clinical consultant ,on February 28, 2024, at the time of the observation confirmed the pharmacy products, enteral tube feeding formulas had expired . 28 Pa. Code 211.9 (k) Pharmacy Services

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide residents dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living, the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to provide showers as scheduled for one resident out of 16 residents sampled (Resident 2). Findings include: A review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF - heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles that causes fatigue, shortness of breath) and above the knee amputation of the right leg and below the knee amputation of the left leg The resident's plan of care for ADL (activities of daily living include bathing, dressing, combing hair, etc.) assistance initiated on July 7, 2022, and revised on November 12, 2023, indicated that Resident 2 had an ADL self-care deficit related to an amputation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store resident care supplies in a sanitary environment and manner in the central supply room. Findings included Observations of the facility's central supply room on February 28, 2024, at 11:15 AM revealed paper litter, dirt, and debris scattered about the floor of the room. There were boxes of personal care supplies directly on the floor, including bags of clean incontinence briefs, boxes of skin and hair cleanser. An oxygen tubing and mask kit was observed on the floor. A skin stapler remover kit was observed on the floor. A foam dressing kit and a piston syringe was observed on the floor. Outside the central supply room, there were 20 boxes of clean incontinence briefs on the floor. An interview with Employee 5 clinical consultant on February 28, 2024, at the time of the observation confirmed the supplies were not stored appropriately. During an interview with the DON (Director of Nursing) on February 28, 2024 at approximately 4:00 PM revealed the central supply room is to be maintained in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and on two of four resident pantries. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observation on the East Nursing Unit during the lunch meal on February 6, 2024, at 12:50 PM revealed that Resident meal trays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life and respect for each resident's dignity and individuality by failing to respond to timely to residents requests for assistance as reported by four residents (Residents 84, 104,176 and 181), timely return a resident's personal clothing for one resident (Resident 182), conduct a dignified dining experience as evidenced by one resident observed (Resident 81), and failed distribute or post menus to afford residents the right to review planned meals to enhance their quality of life as reported by two residents (Resident 172 and 84) out of 27 residents sampled. Findings include: Clinical record revealed that Resident 182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include acute and chronic respiratory distress syndrome (lung condition where organs have inadequate oxygen supply due to fluid buildup in the lungs) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean environment on two of four nursing units (Spruce Unit and [NAME] Unit). Findings include: An observation on February 6, 2024, at approximately 9:00 AM, the hallway connecting [NAME] and Spruce Wing revealed a visible accumulation of dirt and debris in two ceiling vents. An observation on February 6, 2024, at approximately 9:09 AM, revealed the floor in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on the [NAME] Unit felt sticky and an accumulation of debris scattered around the resident's bed. An observation on February 6, 2024, at approximately 10:00 AM, revealed a build-up of white and green stains in the sink in the utility room on [NAME] Wing. An observation of the hall outside the facility's main kitchen on February 6, 2024, at 9:15 AM revealed a thick layer of dust in the ceiling ventilation system. Observation of the resident pantry located on the Spruce Wing on February 6, 2024, at 2:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide and/or efficiently deploy sufficient nursing staff to consistently provide timely quality of care, services, and supervision necessary to maintain the physical and mental well-being of the residents in the facility. Findings include: A review of clinical record revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 81's clinical record revealed that the resident had a diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension, and adjustment disorder. A review of clinical record revealed Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, difficulty walking, and abnormal posture. Observation on the north nursing unit on February 6, 2024, at approximately 9:00 AM 57 residents were residing on the unit. There was two LPNs (license practical nurses) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plan of correction from the survey of December 8, 2023, and the findings of the revisit survey ending February 6, 2024, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement corrective action plans to prevent continued quality deficiencies related to abuse and acceptable practices for the storage and service of food and to ensure that plans designed to improve the delivery of care and services were consistently implemented to effectively deter future quality deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of correction for the survey ending December 8, 2023, revealed that the facility developed a plan of correction that included quality assurance monitoring systems to ensure that solutions were sustained. The results of the current survey ending February 6, 2024, revealed that a thorough investigation of potential abuse had not been completed and continued deficient practice was identified related to this lack of investigation. In response to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to afford a resident the right to make choices regarding their preferences for daily routines, choice of daily clothing, for one resident out of 27 sampled (Resident 137). Findings include: A review of Resident 137's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (stroke), left hemiplegia and hemiparesis, osteoarthritis, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). A review of a Annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated January 6, 2024, section F - preferences for customary routine and activities, indicated that it is very important to the resident for him to choose what clothes to wear. Resident 137's care plan (a guide used to assist in directing resident care) indicated that the resident had an daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, information submitted by the facility, and select investigative reports and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of physical abuse and report the results of the investigation to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for one resident out of 25 sampled (Resident 81). Findings include: During the survey ending February 6, 2024, the survey team made multiple requests for the facility's current abuse prohibition policy, but the facility did not provide the policy by the conclusion of the survey. A review of Resident 81's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on December 29, 2022, with diagnoses, of diabetes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status - a tool to assess cognitive status) of 14. A review of Resident 1's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure that licensed and professional nurses thoroughly assessed resident status and provided the nursing care required by two residents out of 27 sampled (Resident 181). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient's EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: · Assessments · Clinical problems · Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient · Communication with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and clinical records, resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy prescribed for one resident out 27 sampled (Resident 182). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include acute and chronic respiratory distress syndrome (lung condition where organs have inadequate oxygen supply due to fluid buildup in the lungs) and severe persistent asthma (chronic respiratory condition caused by inflammation and constriction of the airway, causing shortness of breath, wheezing and cough). A review of the resident's care plan for altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to respiratory failure dated December 30, 2023, and revised January 10, 2024, revealed that the resident's goal was to have no signs or symptoms or complications related to shortness of breath. Interventions planned were to follow physician order for oxygen.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, test tray results, a review of minutes from the facility's food committee meeting, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to serve food and beverages at palatable and appetizing temperatures on one of four nursing units (East Wing). Findings include: According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. A review of the minutes from the facility's food committee meeting that was conducted by the facility's foodservice director on January 8, 2024, revealed that some food items were not hot enough over the weekend (grilled cheese and soup), spaghetti noodles at times stuck together, and some vegetables were overcooked. During interview with a resident who wished to remain anonymous on February 6, 2024, at 11:30 AM the resident stated that the kitchen is trying but that at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select investigative reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records, according to professional standards of practice for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 93). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient record to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments, Clinical problems, Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient, Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patient's designated support person and other third parties. According to the Title 49,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of grievances lodged with the facility and the minutes from Residents' Council meetings and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by seven alert and oriented residents out of 11 residents interviewed during a group meeting (Residents 9, 53, 57, 85, 123, 165, and 147). Findings include: A review of grievances filed with the facility revealed a grievance filed on August 3, 2023, on behalf of a resident, indicating that care is lacking on the evening shift. The resident indicated that staff did not assist her with care and that she needed to provide her own care. A grievance was filed on August 19, 2023, by a resident, indicated that staff left him in a wet brief. The resident indicated that staff said they would be right back but did not return. A grievance was filed on September 8, 2023, on behalf of a resident, indicated that the resident did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and select incident reports and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to fully develop and implement person-centered comprehensive care plans to meet the individualized toileting and safety needs of two residents (Residents 161 and 278) out of 35 sampled. Findings included: A review of Resident 161's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, cognitive communication deficit [may occur after a stroke, tumor, brain injury, progressive degenerative brain disorder, or other neurological damage and can result in difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language], muscle weakness, and abnormal GAIT (walking pattern) and mobility. A review of a Resident 161's quarterly-Day MDS (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated August 2, 2023, revealed that the resident had severe cognitive impairment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of select facility policies, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, orderly, comfortable, and homelike environment in resident rooms on two of the 10 resident units (E Hall and [NAME] Hall Nursing Units) and failed to allow one resident out of 11 interviewed to use his personal belongings (Resident 123). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Resident Environmental Quality', dated as implemented on April 15, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of this facility to be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. The policy indicates that resident rooms should be at a comfortable temperature for the resident. Resident behavior should be observed (wearing sweaters, wrapping in blankets, etc.) to determine the appropriate temperature level. The policy also indicates that facility personnel are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse policy, clinical records, information submitted by the facility, and select investigative reports and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of physical abuse and report the results of the investigation to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for one resident out of 25 sampled (Resident 26). Findings include: A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, last reviewed by the facility April 15, 2023 revealed that the A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, last reviewed by the facility April 15, 2023, revealed that it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-03-28 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to correctly post daily nursing time. Findings include: During an observation on March 28, 2024, at approximately 9:30 a.m. the facility's posted nursing time was observed in the lobby of the facility. The schedule was posted for the entire day at 9:30 a.m. for the next two shifts of nursing duty. The nursing time was also posted in full time staff equivalents and not the total number of nursing staff members on duty and the actual hours worked by these nursing staff members An interview with the interim NHA (nursing home administrator) on March 28, 2024, at the time of this observation confirmed that the nursing time is to be posted before each shift not for the entire day and should include total number and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c) Nursing services

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$260,715 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $260,715 — penalty dated 2023-12-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-19 for 109 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRESTIGE HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GBRH HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2021
STERN, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER98%since 11/01/2021
MATELEVICH, SUSANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 10%Other / private 8%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$321per resident / day
operating cost
$9,772per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$340per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395421. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next