Fort Myers Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 154 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 174 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2021-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the manufacturer's specification to clean and disinfect multiuse Evencare G3 blood glucose meters for 5 (Residents #16, #24, #63, #116 and #371) of 5 residents observed with a physician's order for blood glucose monitoring (test that measures the amount of sugar in the blood). The facility failed to apply the disinfectant necessary for the minimum wet contact time per manufacturer's instructions to kill bloodborne pathogens on shared multiuse blood glucose meters. Inadequate disinfection may result in indirect contact transmission (the transfer of an infectious agent through a contaminated inanimate object) of pathogens through the improperly disinfected glucometers. The facility had a total of 12 blood glucose meters used for 42 diabetic residents with orders for blood glucose checks. The failure to properly disinfect the blood glucose meters used for multiple residents resulted in a pattern of noncompliance at Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), scope and severity of K starting on 2/23/21. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation procedures for the 3-compartment sink, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and foodborne illness with the potential to impact residents receiving cooked food out of the dietary department. The findings included: The policy for the 3-compartment sink provided by the facility, with no effective date, stated, Sink 1= Wash, sink 2= Rinse, sink 3= Sanitize. Three-compartment sink steps: 1. Preparation: Fill sink (1) with warm Pot and Pan Detergent Solution. Fill Rinse sink (#2) with warm water. Fill the Sanitize sink (#3) with warm sanitizer solution to 200 PPM. 2. Pre-wash: Pre-scrape and rinse all items prior to washing in sink #1. 3. Wash: Scrub all surfaces (including handles). 4. Rinse: Submerge item in rinse water. Let rinse water run back into rinse sink. 5. Sanitize: Submerge item in sanitizer sink for a minimum of 60 seconds. Remove item from sink and let air dry. Do not wipe dry. On 4/2/25 from 11:15-11:25 a.m., during a 3-compartment sink observation, Staff O, a full-time Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of the facility job description of the Activity Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure they provided an ongoing program to support the residents in their choice of activities which are designed to meet the resident's interests and support the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 ( Resident #3 and #91 ) of 3 residents reviewed for involvement in the activity programs. The lack of an ongoing activity program could lead to a decline in the residents' self-esteem, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: The facility Job Description and Performance Evaluation for the Activity Director documented Responsible for the planning, developing, organizing, implementing, evaluating and directing of activity programs in accordance with current exiting federal, state and local standards. Plan develop, organize, evaluate and direct activity programs to ensure all patients/residents assessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0680 — pattern
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility job description for the Activity Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activity professional. This has the potential to affect all 131 current residents residing in the facility. The findings included: The facility Job Description and Performance Evaluation documented Responsible for the planning, developing, organizing, implementing, evaluating and directing of activity programs in accordance with current exiting federal, state and local standards. Plan develop, organize, evaluate and direct activity programs to ensure all patients/residents assessed needs are met. Record and maintain activity progress notes as well as a record of resident activities. Qualifications Education College specialization, certification preferred. On 4/2/25 at 9:06 a.m., in an interview Activity Assistant Staff C said she did not have a certification for the position of the Activity Director and no training for the position. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures, record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheters were secured to prevent pulling and injury and failed to maintain the catheters in sanitary manner for 3 (Resident #50, #423, and #274) of 3 residents reviewed with an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings included: The facility policy Catheter-Foley documented Completing the procedure, Secure the catheter to the residents thigh (i.e , Stat Lock or Catheter Strap) to prevent movement, irritation and decrease risk of infection. Never leave the catheter hanging to be pulled by the weight of the bag. Place catheter bag in a dignity bag. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #50 had a readmission date of 7/20/25 with diagnoses including morbid obesity, paraplegia, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, dementia, anxiety and delusional disorder. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of the facility job description of the Activity Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that are complete, and accurately documented for 2 (Residents #3, and #91) of 28 residents records reviewed. The findings included: The facility Job Description and Performance Evaluation for the Activity Director documented Responsible to Record and maintain activity progress notes as well as a record of resident activities. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #3 had an admission date of 1/4/24 with diagnoses including dementia with restlessness, anxiety disorder, delusional and adjustment disorder. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 5/19/24 documented Resident #3's preference for routine and activities specified it was very important for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment that allows the resident to use the physical layout to maximize independence and does not pose a safety risk for 4 (#52, #57, #273, #274) of 5 residents reviewed. The findings included: Review of an admissions agreement (no date) revealed, The facility will provide resident with room and board, nursing service, and laundering of linens. 1. Record review of Resident #52 was admitted on [DATE] a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS), with a score of 10 on 3/5/25, indicating that he has moderately impaired cognition. Resident #52's diagnoses included Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective disorder. On 3/31/25 at 9:25 a.m., Resident #52 was observed sitting on the side of his bed dressed in personal clothing. A blue incontinent brief soiled with feces like substance was observed on the bathroom floor. On 3/31/25 at 9:25 a.m., during an interview and continuous observation Resident #52 gestured to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #96) of 3 residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, or related condition was referred to the appropriate state-designated mental health or intellectual disability authority for review for a Level II screening. The findings included: Resident # 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) with a diagnosis of Anxiety but did not indicate a need for further review. On 7/29/24 a new Level 1 PASRR was completed with mental illness or suspected mental illness including mental disorder, psychosis, and adjustment disorder with anxiety added and indications of lack of focus and adapting to typical change. The new Level 1 PASRR from 7/29/24 was sent for a second level review, with a response on 8/5/25 that Resident #96 was not considered to have a serious mental illness. A review of Resident #96 record revealed the Medication Administration Record contained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the needs for personal hygiene, nail care, assistance with dressing, and toileting for 1 (Residents #28) of 5 dependent residents reviewed. The findings included: On 3/31/25 at 4:22 p.m., Resident #28 was observed lying in bed. The nails of the resident's right and left hand extended approximately ¾ inch from the fingertips. The fingers of the left hand were curled with the nails pressing into the resident's palm. On 4/1/25 at 12:31 p.m., observation of Resident #28's fingernails revealed they remained untrimmed and extended approximately ¾ inch from the fingertips. In an interview Resident #28 said he guesses staff would trim his nails if he asked. On 4/1/25 at 5:16 p.m., in an interview Resident #28 said staff asked maybe once or twice if they could trim the fingernails. He said he was not able to trim his own nails due to reduced dexterity and limited range of motion to the left hand. On 4/2/25 at 10:32 a.m., Resident #28 was observed in bed. His fingernails nails remained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication, coordination and collaboration between the nursing home and the dialysis staff for 1 (Resident #87) of 1 sampled resident receiving dialysis services reviewed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #87 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of [DATE] revealed Resident #87's cognition was mildly impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12. 1. Review of the physician's orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed Resident #87 dialysis days were scheduled for Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The physician order dated [DATE] noted the resident's code status was Do not resuscitate (DNR) meaning not to initiate Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. Review of a Circle of Care meeting dated [DATE] revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, which increased the risk of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (Residents #23, #274 and #278) of 3 residents reviewed for catheter care and enhanced barrier precautions. The findings included: 1. The policy for Catheter-Foley Care provided by the facility, last revised on 4/25/22, stated, Keep the bag below the level of the bladder at all times to prevent the backflow of urine and decrease the risk for infection. Never leave the catheter hanging to be pulled by the weight of the bag. Do not leave the catheter bag/tubing laying on the floor. Place the catheter bag in a dignity bag. To avoid this issue and avoid infection control issues, the catheter bag/dignity bag may also be placed in a wash basin to avoid direct contact with the floor. Clinical record review revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included a past medical history…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JONATHAN BLEIER — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $75K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL