No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowview Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

9209 Ridge Pike, White Marsh, PA 19128 · For profit - Corporation · 244 certified beds · (610) 825-6560 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$79,414 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $79,414 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8945 Ridge Ave · (215) 483-8558 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
553 Germantown Pike · (610) 828-5222 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
531 Germantown Pike · (610) 941-7101 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2391 Harts Ln · (610) 828-7276 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
708 Ridge Pike · (610) 828-9066

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.2%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.3%10.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.6%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.6%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.2%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine28.0%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.4%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.4%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.961.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.351.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.6%CMS range 40.5–60.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.6–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.8–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
60.3%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 244 beds and averages 229.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, review of video footage and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of four residents reviewed was free from verbal, physical and psychological abuse from a nursing staff. (Resident R1) This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident R1 who was rough handled, yelled at with the use of profane language, struck in the chest sustaining injuries to the fourth finger on the right hand and chest area and demonstrated signs of fear when approached by nursing staff. Findings include: Review of facility policy on Abuse Prevention and Management, with revise date of September 8, 2022, revealed that under section Policy: The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation, exploitation of resident/patient property by anyone, including staff, family, friends, visitors, etc. The facility has designed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-10-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff, reviews of facility policies and procedures, and hospital records, it was determined the facility failed to assess, monitor, and implement intervention to ensure that nutritional and hydration needs were met for one of 11 residents reviewed. (Resident R1). This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident CL1 who did not consume sufficient fluid and caloric intake resulting in abnormal blood values, requiring transfer, and admission to the hospital for the treatment of dehydration/electrolyte imbalance. (Resident CL1) Findings include:Review of facility policy titled nutrition assessment dated [DATE], revealed the facility staff were responsible for ensuring each resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status. The policy indicated the facility staff were responsible for recognizing and addressing the nutritional and hydration needs of each resident. The facility staff were to provide a diet based on the resident's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility provided documentation, review of policy and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure that training related to psychosocial needs/behavioral health needs was provided for nine of 10 employees reviewed. (Employee E17, E18, E19, E20, E21, E22, E23, E24, and E25)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Behavioral - Mental Health Care - Substance Use Services,' revised March 19, 2025, revealed that Training: facility will provide an effective training program for all staff which includes training on behavioral health care and services, mental disorders, psychosocial disorders, PTSD, and/or SUD, that is appropriate and effective as determined by staff need and the facility assessment; facility staff includes all facility staff (direct and indirect care functions), contracted staff, and volunteers . Further review of policy revealed that a behavioral health training as determined by the facility assessment should include, at a minimum, the competencies and skills necessary to provide the following: Person-centered care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility meal test tray, review of resident council meeting minutes, resident interviews, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that are palatable, attractive, and at appetizing temperatures.Findings Include: A meal test tray was completed on April 15, 2026. While in the kitchen trays of coffee cups were seen being prepared by a dietary staff at 12:45 p.m. The test tray left the kitchen at 1:18pm and went out to the B wing unit. The test tray was served at 1:24 p.m. The test tray contained a plate of baked ziti, broccoli, and garlic bread. The baked ziti was tasted and was not appetizing. The baked ziti was too overdone that is disintegrated without having to chew it. There were two beverages served, a milk and a coffee. The coffee temperature was 174.2 degrees. Interview with the Food Services Director Employee E7 revealed the coffee was poured directly out of the coffee urn. Typically, the coffee is poured into the cup, a lid put on, and it sits for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with residents and staff, and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike environment in one of the five nursing units observed (C Wing).Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights last revised April 6, 2026 states, Policy: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Procedure: 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. A dignified existence b. Safe and home-like environment Interview held with Resident R114 on April 13, 2026 at 12:13 p.m. resident states that the facility has a problem with a hole in the bathroom on C-wing and it has not been fixed. A tour was taken of the C wing common bathrooms on April 14, 2026 at 10:03 a.m. The Tub Room was observed first and there was a hole in the wall behind door when you enter into the room. The second common…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident's clinical records, facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of one residents were free from verbal abuse (Resident R246).Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Policy-Prevention and Management revised September 8, 2022, revealed verbal abuse includes, but is not limited to oral, written, or gestured language, that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms, to the resident/patient or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe resident/patient, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. The policy continues by saying Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to:Harassing a resident;Mocking, insulting, ridiculing;Yelling or hovering over a resident, with the intent to intimidate;Threatening residents, including but limited to, depriving a resident of care or withholding a resident from contact with family and friends; andIsolating a resident from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included the minimum information necessary to properly care for a resident related to urinary catheter within 48 hours of admission for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident R232)Findings include: Facility policy titled Care Planning Process and Care Conference, revised on March 19, 2025, indicates that An interdisciplinary baseline care plan will be initiated upon admission by the admitting nurse and completed within 48 hours. The policy further indicates that this is Care Plan is to include such initial needs/problems such as ADL's, falls, skin tears, risk for skin breakdown, nutritional status, behaviors, pacemaker, anticoagulants, psychotropic medication use etc. Include a care plan related to the resident's primary diagnosis. Review of Resident R232's clinical record revealed Resident R232 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policy, review of clinical records and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined facility did not ensure to develop and implement a resident centered care plan for one of 36 residents reviewed related to substance use disorder. (Resident R245)Findings include:Review of facility policy 'Care Planning Process and Care Conference,' revised on March 19, 2025, indicated that to foster the philosophy of the facility, in compliance with Federal and State Regulations and in accordance with HIPPA Regulations, the facility will develop a comprehensive, resident centered care plan for each resident/patient. Care plan development, renewal and revision will be based upon the results of the resident assessment. Review of facility policy 'Behavioral - Mental Health Care - Substance Use Services,' revised March 19, 2025, states that Individualized Assessment and Person- Centered Planning includes assessing psychosocial well-being , mood state, and behavioral symptoms by the interdisciplinary team (IDT). Further review of policy revealed that facility must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record, facility documentation, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility did not ensure adequate supervision for one resident with a history of substance use disorder (SUD). (Resident R245). Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Behavioral - Mental Health Care - Substance Use Services,' revised March 19, 2025, states that behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being which includes, but not limited to the prevention and treatment of mental health disorders, and SUD. Residents demonstrating change/s in behavior shall be evaluated to ensure that appropriate interventions, (both non-pharmacological and pharmacological) as needed, are instituted in a timely manner. Further review of policy identifies substance use disorder as a recurrent use of alcohol and/or drugs that causes clinically and functionally significant impairment, such as health problems, disability and failure to meet major responsibilities at work,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon review of resident records, and interviews with residents and staff determined the facility failed to follow a resident's care plan consistent with the resident's rights that meets a resident's mental and psychosocial needs by failing to ensure one resident does not receive male care givers as indicated of 15 resident records reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include:Resident R2 was initially admitted to the facility June 2019 diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder (a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event).Resident R2's care plan dated September 23, 2023, for ineffective coping due to past traumatic events that triggers include male care givers. Per the sister's request is not to have a male aide.Review of documentation received from the facility stated on May 1, 2025, Resident R2 made allegations of abuse when a male aide, Employee E9 was assigned to the resident.Interview with Employee R9 on October 21, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. confirmed the aide was assigned Resident R2 on May 1, 2025, and stated he was aware Resident R2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with residents and staff, review of clinical records, facility documentation and in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurately documented for one of 15 resident records reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of Resident R1's clinical records revealed the resident was alert and oriented and admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with atherosclerotic heart disease.Review Resident R1's nursing note dated October 13, 2025, indicated the resident said the aide pushed her while putting her in bed. The resident was noted with a large hematoma (blood leaks outside the blood vessels, usually due to injury) to her forehead and was given an icepack.Review of documentation received from the facility indicated the resident's skin was intact with no discoloration.Interview on October 22, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. unit supervisor, registered nurse, Employee E14 worked the night of the incident and assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, reviews of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of eight residents' clinical records reviewed. (Resident R2)Findings include:Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on July10, 2025, with diagnosis of Combined Systolic and Diastolic Heart Failure (a condition where the heart has difficulty both pumping blood out [systolic dysfunction] and filling with blood [diastolic dysfunction], Pericardial Effusion (a condition where excess fluid accumulates in the pericardium, the sac-like structure that surrounds the heart), Pleural Effusion (a condition where excess fluid accumulates in the space between the lungs [pleural cavity and the chest wall], and Thrombocytopenia (a condition characterized by a low platelet count in the blood. Platelets are essential for blood clotting, so their deficiency can lead to excessive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures for eight of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R169, R91, R178, R25, R131C, R45, R199 and R110). Findings include: A review of the Food and Nutrition Services Test Tray and Accuracy Evaluation form Revised November 19, 2019, revealed that the standard for cold food is 45 degrees or less and for hot food 135 degrees or more. Interview with Resident R169 on April 7, 2025, at 10:35 a.m. revealed that he thinks that the food sucks, that it is not always hot, you should try it. Interview with Resident R91 on April 7, 2025, at 10:41 a.m. revealed that he does not like the food, that it is too soft and mushy. Interview with Resident R178 on April 7, 2025, at 10:50 a.m. revealed the meals are bad, the food is never right, doesn't taste right, it's the kitchen not the nursing staff. Interview with Resident R131 on April 7, 2025, at 11:05 a.m. revealed that the food here tastes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of closed clinical records, facility policies and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an appropriate discharge was documented in the resident's clinical record for one of four closed records reviewed. (Resident R523) Findings Include: Review of Resident R523's Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was discharged from the facility and the resident was not anticipated to return to the facility. It was revealed that the discharge was unplanned and the resident was discharged to the hospital. Review of clinical record for Resident R523 on April 8, 2025 revealed that there was no documentation available in the clinical record to indicate a reason for residents discharge. Review of a discharge summary completed by the nurse practitioner dated March 3, 2025 but signed as completed on April 9, 2025 revealed that resident was not seen within the 72 hours from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated transfers to the hospital and that a resident's representative was made aware of a facility-initiated transfer in writing, for one of four clinical records reviewed. (Residents R136) Findings Include: Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident was discharged from the facility and the resident was not anticipated to return to the facility. It was revealed that the discharge was unplanned and he was discharged to the hospital. Review of clinical record for Resident R523 on April 8, 2025 revealed that there was no documentation available in the resident's clinical record to indicate a reason for residents discharge. Review of a discharge summary completed by the nurse practitioner dated March 3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policies and staff interview, it was determined that the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not appropriately completed according to the resident assessment for one of five residents reviewed (Residents R184). Findings include: The PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) was created in 1987 through language in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and it has three goals: to identify individuals with mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure they are placed appropriately, whether in the community or in a nursing facility, and to ensure they receive the services they require for their mental illness or intellectual disability. The PASRR Level 1 must be completed on all persons who are considering admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility. A Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the Level 1 PASRR determined that the person is a targeted person with mental illness or an intellectual disability. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to developed a comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives for a resident who exhibited aggressive behaviors towards other residents for one of 35 clinical records reviewed. (Resident R325) Findings include: Review of Resident R325's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of history of transient ischemic attack (mini stokes), cerebral infraction, depression (major loss of interest in pleasurable activites), schizophrenia (mental disease characterized by loss of reality), and bipolar disorder (condition in which a person has periods of depression and periods of being extremely happy). Review of Resident R325's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident needs) dated February 12, 2025 revealed that the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score 11, which indicated moderate impairment. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's care plans, related to accuracy of information, for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R184). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Care Planning Process and Care Conference dated revised March 19, 2025, revealed, Care plan development, renewal and revision will be based upon the results of the resident assessment. Review of Resident R184's care plan, dated April 3, 2024, revealed that the resident had an indwelling suprapubic catheter (a tube that has been surgically inserted into the bladder to drain urine). Review of Resident R184's Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated January 6, 2025, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Continued review revealed that the resident did not have a urinary catheter. Continued review of Resident R184's care plan, dated April 3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records, interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R175). Findings Include: Review of Resident R175's nursing notes dated March 7, 2025 revealed that unit manager spoke to resident regarding his low hemoglobin, in the past was on Epoetin alfa injection which the resident was refusing. Per resident, he would take the shot if it prevented him from going to emergency for transfusions. Physician was aware and had new order to place injection. Review of physician order for Resident R175 dated March 9, 2025 revealed an order for Epoetin Alfa-epbx Injection Solution 10000 UNIT/ML, inject 1ML subcutaneously one time a day every Tuesday Thursday and Sunday for anemia. Review of medication administration record for Resident R175 revealed that the resident did not receive the medication on March 16, 2025 and March 23, 2025. Review of practitioner progress note dated March 20, 2025 revealed that the resident was seen for discussion of lab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, a review of facility policies and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain the highest practicable level of pain management was maintained for two of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R9 and R132). Findings include: Review of facility policy Administering Medications revealed that Medications must be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Review of Resident R9's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include but not limited to chronic ulcer to the left ankle with fat layer exposed. Continued review of medical records for Resident R9 including the quarterly assessment MDS (an assessment of care needs) dated March 9, 2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status evaluation which revealed that resident had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. Interview with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations,staff interviews and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the recommended therapeutic diet that she made, was provided to a resident for 1 out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R210). Findings include Review of the facility policy, Therapeutic diets, with a revision date of January 7, 2025. The policy stated that therapeutic diets are prepared and served according to written orderS from the attending physician. Review of the April 2025 physician orders for Resident R210 indicated that the resident was admitted into the facility on December 19, 2024 from a local hospital with diagnosis that included the following: cerebral infarction (a stroke), hypertension (high blood pressure); aphasia (a disorder that affects how you communicate usually after a stroke or head injury) an dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Continued review of the physician orders for the resident included a physician's order dated December 19, 2024 and monthly thereafter for the resident to have a mechanical soft texture diet with nectar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility documents and resident clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R89). Findings Include: Review of Resident R89's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated September 1, 2022, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of altered mental status. Further review of the MDS, Section C - Cognitive Patterns (items in this section are intended to determine the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information - these items are crucial factors in many care-planning decisions), indicated that Resident R49 scored a 0 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of an admission note dated August 30, 2022 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, homelike environment on three of five nursing units(A, B, E Nursing Units) E unit shower room. Findings include: Facility Policy titled Bathroom Cleaning unknown date, indicated under option 5 clean and sanitize toilet (including raised toiled seats) using infectable cleaner. Facility Policy titled Resident's Room Cleaning unknown date, indicated to provide a detailed description of the steps that are to be completed daily in the cleaning of a resident room. Daily cleaning will ensure optimum levels of cleanliness and sanitation, prohibit the spread of infections and bacteria, and maintain the outward appearance of the facility. Observation of facility B nurisng unit on June 5, 2024, 10:22 a.m. revealed the following observations, In room B 101 there was CPAP (a respiratory equipment) tubing on the floor. In room B 106 there was dried brown substance on the floor, it appeared like dried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observations, interviews and review of clinical records and facility policy, determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission for three residents with indwelling medical devices and hand hygiene for one resident during medication administration (Resident R21, R87 and R129) of 35 residents records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility 's policy Transmission Based Precautions revised in April 2024, states Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) will be initiated when there is a reason to believe a resident has a communicable infectious disease, which may include using Enhanced-Barrier Precautions (EBP). EBP are designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in facilities by using targeted gown and glove during high contact resident care activities to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation, facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for three of four months of antibiotic stewardship program data reviewed. (January 2024, February 2024, March 2024 and April 2024). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship-Surveillance dated February 8, 2024, revealed the Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility: approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility-wide antibiotic stewardship. The facility's antibiotic stewardship program will promote the appropriate use of antibiotics and includes a system of monitoring to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance. This development should include leadership support and accountability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation related to missing medication for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R205). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse Policy - Prevention and Management dated reviewed September 2023, revealed, The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation/exploitation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, visitors, etc. Continued review revealed, Examples of misappropriation of resident property include . Diversion of a resident's medication(s), including, but not limited to, controlled substances for staff use or personal gain. Review of facility policy, Narcotic Management dated revised July 1, 2023, revealed, Control/schedule II-V medication will be counted with two professional nurses at the beginning and end of each shift.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of an alleged violation for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R81). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Reporting and Investigation dated, September 2023, revealed, . The Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Risk Manager, if applicable are responsible for Investigation and reporting. Upon receiving an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, Neglect, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of an unknown source, the Administrator/DON/designee will conduct an investigation to include but not limited to the Following: Complete paperwork for investigation of abuse, neglect, misappropriation; Interview the person(s) reporting the incident; Interview any witnesses to the incident; Interview the resident, if able; Interview the resident ' s attending physician and review of the resident ' s record; Interview staff members (on all shifts) having contact with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not appropriately completed according to the resident assessment for two of three residents reviewed related to PASRR assessments (Residents R25 and R208). Findings include: The PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) was created in 1987 through language in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and it has three goals: to identify individuals with mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure they are placed appropriately, whether in the community or in a nursing facility, and to ensure they receive the services they require for their mental illness or intellectual disability. The PASRR Level 1 must be completed on all persons who are considering admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility. A Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the Level 1 PASRR determined that the person is a targeted person with mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility policy, review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not develop a baseline care plan for a newly admitted residents with history of drug abuse for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R527) Findings Include: Review of clinical record for Resident R527 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including opioid abuse, psychoactive substance abuse and schizophrenia (A disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). Review of a physician progress note for Resident R527 dated March 5, 2024 revealed that the resident had history of opioid( heroin) abuse. A review of baseline care plan for Resident R 527 dated March 4, 2024, revealed that there was evidence that the facility developed a care plan with intervention for drug abuse and behavioral concerns. Continued review of baseline care plan under social service section revealed that the mental health needs, social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident care plan was developed and implemented related to adaptive equipment required for swallowing liquids properly (Resident R40) and failed to implement care and services identified on a comprehensive care plan regarding unwanted behaviors and mealtime (Resident R81) for two of 35 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care Planning Process and Care Conference last revised July 2023, indicated that the care plan is a working tool that provides a profile of the needs of the individual resident/patient; the resident/patient care plan will be available for use by staff caring for the resident. The interdisciplinary team will meet within 21 days of admission, readmission, when a change of condition occurs and annually to develop the comprehensive, resident centered plan of care for each resident. Once the initial MDS is completed, the Clinical Reimbursement Specialist will initiate any care plan triggered by a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical review, staff interviews and medication manufacture's medication insert, it was determined the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 35 residents reviewed (resident R 96) regarding proper medication order. Findingsinclude: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Chapter 21 physician assistant and certified registered nurse practitioners. Profession, and vocational standards, Standards, subpart A Chapter 18 The State Board of Medical Practitioners other than medical doctors, indicates that a CRNP(certified nurse practitioner) with prescriptive authority approval may, when acting in collaboration with a physician as set forth in a prescriptive authority collaborative agreement and within the CRNP's specialty, prescribe and dispense drugs and give written or oral orders for drugs and other medical therapeutic or corrective measures. These orders may include: orders for drugs, total parenteral nutrition and lipids, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were followed related to insulin for two residents (Residents R6 and R42) and adaptive equipment for one resident (Resident R40) of 35 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Diabetes Mellitus, Guidelines for dated reviewed June 2023, revealed, Glucose monitoring guidelines: Blood sugar level and frequency measured when ordered . Facility protocol in place for physician notification with specific parameters for notification. Review of facility policy, Medication Administration/Disposition dated revised September 6, 2023, revealed, If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and use the corresponding code on the EMAR [electronic medication administration record] to indicate the medication was not given and the reason for not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and services to prevent pressure ulcers for two of 35 sampled residents reviewed. (Resident R59 and Resident R177) Findings include: Review of facility policy Risk assessment and prevention dated October 6, 2023, revealed that The facility will strive to ensure that a resident entering the facility without pressure ulcers/pressure injuries does not develop pressure ulcer/injuries. Unless the clinical condition demonstrates unavoidable skin breakdown. Prevention of pressure ulcer/injuries requires early identification of at-risk residents and the implementation of preventions strategies. Manage pressure. -Use support surface on bed and or wheelchair. -Use turning and positioning plan if indicated -Off load heel pressure Clinical record review revealed that Resident R59 had diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit and severe protein calorie malnutrition. The Minimum Data Set assessment (Assessment of resident care needs) dated March 28,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the observations, review of clinical records, facility policies, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion, received appropriate services to prevent further decline in range of motion and maintain appropriate positioning for one of 35 resident s reviewed. (Resident R70). Finding Include: Review of facility policy ADL Care, Contractures, Preventative Care and Treatment and Restorative ROM Program, dated March 12, 2024, revealed that A plan of care will be developed based on the resident's individual ADL ROM/impaired joint mobility Needs. -There must be a clearly defined problem statement that identifies the restorative need; -The restorative nursing program is not the problem statement, it is an intervention; -There must be a measurable goal related to the problem; measurable objectives describe what The resident is expected to achieve, such as ROM goals/measurements to be achieved within a Specific timeframe; - There must be individualized Interventions; care plan interventions must include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility records, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate accounting of controlled drugs for one of three medication storage rooms reviewed (B unit medication room). Finding Include Observation of facility B unit medication room with Employee E32, Licensed Practical Nurse, on June 6, 2024, at 9:17 a.m., revealed a bottle of lorazepam liquid medication in the refrigerator. The bottle contained 14 ml of medications left in the bottle. Employee E32 confirmed the amount of medication left in the bottle. Review of narcotic count sheet for the lorazepam medication revealed that the amount should have been left should have been 4.5 ml. Employee E32 stated noticed the discrepancy 2 days ago and the amount was almost 10 ml extra that what was accounted for. Interview with Director of Nursing on June 6, 2024, at 12:17 p.m., confirmed that there was discrepancy with Lorazepam liquid on B nursing unit. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1)(k) Pharmacy Services

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs related to the use of antipsychotic medication without adequate monitoring for one of five resident reviewed for drug regimen. (Resident R207.) Findings Include: Review of physician order for Resident R207 dated April 3, 2024, revealed an order for Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg, half tablet by mouth at bedtime for schizophrenia. Review of pharmacy review of Resident R207 dated May 19, 2024, revealed that Please watch for ataxia and falls secondary to Seroquel. Seroquel may cause extra pyramidal symptoms ([NAME] effects of some medications, such as antipsychotic drugs, that can affect movement.), tardive dyskinesia (a chronic, drug-induced movement disorder that causes involuntary, repetitive body movements.), akathisia (a neuropsychiatric movement disorder that makes it difficult to sit still and causes an uncontrollable urge to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate meal trays for one of two residents and failed to provide food products based on the resident's food preference for three of 35 residents (Resident R88, 107, R212). Review of facility policy Resident Preferences, last revised January 2024, indicates Residents' individual choices including religious, cultural, and ethnic needs and preferences are obtained. Residents are served meals that offer choices and comply with food preferences. On June 5, 2024, at 12:13 p.m. Resident R212 reported that food preferences are not being honored. His/her ticket is preference for double portions protein, and he/she is not getting them during meals times. On June 5, 2024, at 12:25 p.m. Resident's R212 lunch arrived, and lunch ticket indicated double meat sandwich to meals tray. Lunch tray was missing sandwich. Licensed Dietician, Employee E5 confirmed that resident's preference did not reflet the lunch tray. On June 6, 2024, at 10:21 a.m. Resident Council Meeting was held with 11 alert and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain appropriate supervision for two of three residents reviewed (Resident R1 and R6). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Suicide Prevention, reviewed September 2023, revealed it is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents who voice and/or display suicidal ideation actions receive services and interventions to help them manage feelings and maintain their psychosocial wellbeing. Procedure includes implement 1:1 oversight until resident does not exhibit any suicidal ideations. Place resident on close observation as needed after 1:1 observation determined not needed. Review of Resident R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated April 29, 2024, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - assessment used to monitor cognition) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility to make certain that residents were protected from verbal, physical and psychological abuse from a nursing staff for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R1) This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for Resident R1. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) state that the NHA is responsible to establish and maintaining systems that are efficient and effective to operate the nursing home in a manner to safely meet residents' needs in accordance with federal,state and local regulations. Develop and enforce a monitoring program to assure compliance with federal, state, and local requirements. Review of the job description for the Director of Nursing (DON) state that the DON functions as the administrative authority for the Department of Nursing. The Director will be responsible for the organization and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and functional environment for residents and staff in four of five central bathing rooms (A wing, B wing, C wing, D wing) and in the boiler room. Findings include: A tour of the central bathing rooms on the five nursing units at 10:00 a.m. on September 11, 2023, with Employee E12, the Infection Preventionist, revealed the following: Observations in the central bathroom on A Wing revealed a wall mounted heating and air conditioning unit with rust colored corrosion on the lowered vents at the top of the unit and adjacent sheet metal cover. Observations in the central bathroom on B Wing revealed a bariatric shower chair with rust colored corrosion on the white metal pipes on the underside of the chair. Observations in the central bathroom on C Wing revealed a shower chair with build-up of medium brown colored material on the white pipes on the underside of the chair. Observations in the central bathroom on D Wing revealed a wall mounted heating and air conditioning unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the resident was provided needed care and services related to follow up medical appointments for surgery clearance as recommended for one of four clinical records reviewed (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of Resident R3's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of pyelonephritis (inflammation of the kidney, typically due to a bacterial infection). Review of Resident R3's August 10, 2023, Urology Consult revealed a diagnosis of nephrolithiasis (the presence of stones in the kidney due to a decrease in urine volume or excess of stone-forming substances in the urine, causing back pain, abdominal pain, burning sensation during urination, blood in urine and fever. Urgent medical attention is usually recommended in severe cases by healthcare providers and can be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$79,414 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $79,414 — penalty dated 2024-01-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JONATHAN BLEIER — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WM HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2016
BLEIER, JONATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 02/01/2016
SOD, YAAKOVIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 02/01/2016
FOX, CATHERINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2016
SOFIA, LISAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2016

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$24.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 6%Other / private 12%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$286per resident / day
operating cost
$8,693per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395296. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next