Premier Cadbury Of Cherry Hill
2150 Route 38, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 118 certified beds · (856) 667-4550 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $21,752 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-20)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.8% | 8.7% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.6% | 12.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.3% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.5% | 18.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 5.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.2% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.5% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.2% | 80.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.5% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.4% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 2.07 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.67 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.6%CMS range 40.0–56.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 8.2–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.7–8.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.33 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 100.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2024-11-20 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to activate their emergency response system including calling emergency services/911 for a resident (Resident #103) who was found unresponsive and was a full-code status (all resuscitation procedures will be provided when a person stops breathing or their heart stops beating) in accordance with the Basic Life Support (BLS) for Healthcare Providers. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for a death in the facility. A review of the Progress Notes (PN) and interviews with the licensed nursing staff revealed that on [DATE] at 4:30 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) found Resident #103 unresponsive and reported it to the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) who began performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). LPN #1 stopped CPR, did not call 911 and did not notify the Registered Nurse (RN #1) until 5:50 AM (one hour and ten…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 00173863 Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a treatment that was ordered for a right shin tear was implemented without a 23-day delay which resulted in the wound worsening with a necrotic (death of cells in your body tissues) wound infection that required a seven-day antibiotic treatment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #305) reviewed for pressure ulcer and was evidenced by the following: On 11/6/24 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #305. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) revealed that the resident had diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Alzheimer's disease, dementia, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and muscle weakness. A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 4/10/24, included the resident's cognition was severely impaired; the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint Intake # 2740465Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safe and appetizing temperatures of food served to the residents. This deficient practice was identified during the lunchtime meal service on 3/13/26, on 1 of 2 nursing units ([NAME] 600) and was evidenced by the following:On 3/13/26 at 12:25 PM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor conducted a test tray with a calibrated (calibration ensures that the thermometer is accurate and precise for the measurement of food temperatures) thermometer. The meal tray cart arrived on the unit at 12:20 PM. It was an open, not enclosed, cart. The surveyor tagged the bottom tray for temperature testing. When all the meal trays were delivered to the residents from that truck at 12:25 PM, the temperatures were checked for a regular consistency meal. The temperatures were as follows: Turkey Burger-95 degrees Fahrenheit 4-ounce milk carton: 46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain clean kitchen equipment and b.) store foods in a manner intended to prevent the spread of food borne illness in resident pantries. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 3/11/26 at 09:20 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following: 1. On a large open stainless-steel shelf, the surveyor observed stacks of stainless-steel pans. The surveyor observed eight stainless steel pans. When the surveyor separated the eight pains there was wet nesting within each pan. One of the pans had a dried yellow substance on the inside. The surveyor asked the FSD if they were clean pans and he stated yes, but he would rewash the pans. The FSD acknowledged the wet nesting within each pan and proceeded to remove them from the shelf. 2. The pellet warmer had paper stored inside the pellet warmer. The FSD said it had not worked for Close to a year. On 3/13/26 at 11:56 AM, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a consultant physician's recommendations in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #47) reviewed for accommodation of needs and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide residents with mail delivery between December 2025 and late February 2026. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #49) during a resident council group meeting and was evidenced by the following: On 3/12/26 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident council group meeting with five alert and oriented residents (Resident #11, # 22, #49, #65, and #95). The surveyor interviewed the residents regarding mail delivery. All residents stated that the Activities Director (ACD) coordinated mail delivery, but that the facility had no ACD between December 2025 and late February 2026. Resident #49 further stated that he/she did not receive mail between December 2025 and late February 2026 and that an activities aide at that time found a box of undelivered mail. On 3/16/26 at 10:22 AM, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) #1 who stated the ACD coordinated mail delivery at the facility and that the previous ACD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain the most recent State of New Jersey inspection results in a place readily accessible to the residents, and b.) post notice of the availability of the inspection results in prominent areas. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 2 units ([NAME] 5 and [NAME] 6) and was evidenced by the following: On 3/12/26 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident council meeting with five alert and oriented residents. All five residents stated they were not aware of the location of the State Survey results. On 3/13/26 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor toured the [NAME] 5 unit but was unable to locate the most recent State Survey results. There was no signage on the unit to indicate where to find the State Survey results. At that time, the surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) #1 where the State Survey results were, but he was unable to answer and stated he would get the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment that was clean, safe, and sanitary. This deficient practice was identified for 1of 2 units ([NAME] 6 Unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/11/26 at 10:10 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER]B on the [NAME] 6 Unit, the surveyor observed a personal refrigerator. Inside the refrigerator door, there was an unlabeled, open container of food. [NAME] and red debris were identified on the bottom of the refrigerator, along with a loose piece of a blue paper label. The freezer compartment did not contain a thermometer, and the floor of the freezer was covered in ice. [NAME] and red debris were also visible on the bedroom floor. The wall had areas of missing white paint, exposing the paper layer of the drywall. In the bathroom, black scuff marks appeared on the walls, and the wall trim was hanging adjacent to the toilet, with black residue on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) notify the representative of the Office of the State of Long-Term Care Ombudsman about a resident's emergency discharge to the hospital and b.) provide the bed hold policy for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #99) reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice was evidenced by:On 3/12/26 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical records (combination of electronic and paper medical records) for Resident #99. The resident had a facility-initiated discharge (d/c) and was no longer in the facility. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident had diagnoses that included influenza, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), seizures, heart disease, and dementia. A review of the Progress Notes (PN) revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on 1/5/26 and admitted with a diagnosis of respiratory distress. A review of the New Jersey Universal Transfer Form (NJUTF) indicated the resident was transferred on 1/5/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records, and other facility documentation, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, for 3 of 20 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #5, and #61).1.) On 3/11/26 at 9:54 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 awake and alert sitting in a wheelchair in his/her room. The resident stated that he/she did not speak English. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #1. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 1/19/26, revealed that in section C for cognitive patterns, the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not assessed. The omission did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of the resident's change in condition for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #99). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 3/12/26 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid medical records (combination of electronic and paper medical records) for Resident #99. The resident had a facility-initiated discharge (d/c) and was no longer in the facility. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident had diagnoses that included, influenza, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), seizures, heart disease, and dementia. A review of the individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus, dated 1/2/26, that the resident had influenza. Interventions included: Monitor vital signs as ordered and notify the physician of significant abnormalities. A review of the Progress Notes (PN) dated 1/4/26 at 2:41 PM, revealed the resident refused their medications, refused to eat their breakfast and lunch, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that therapy services and treatment for range of motion limitations were provided for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for range of motion concerns. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/11/26 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #9 in his/her bedroom, seated in a wheelchair next to the bed. The resident stated that he/she had difficulty using the right side of his/her body. The resident's right hand was contracted, and no orthosis or hand splint was in place. On 3/12/26 at 9:14 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #9 in the hallway on the [NAME] 6 Unit, self-propelling in his/her wheelchair. He/she stated to the surveyor that he/she was going outside to smoke. His/her right hand was contracted, and he/she was not wearing an orthosis or hand splint. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #9. A review of the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a nutritional supplement as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/12/26 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #5 sitting in bed with the lunch tray on the overbed table. The surveyor observed the lunch meal ticket included a [name redacted] nutritional supplement (a fortified protein and calorie dense nutritional frozen dessert designed to fight malnutrition supplement) with the meal. The surveyor observed that the nutritional supplement was not on the lunch tray. At that time, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN # 1) who confirmed the nutritional supplement was not on the lunch tray. On 3/13/26 at 9:00 am, the surveyor observed Resident #5 sitting in bed with the breakfast meal tray on the overbed table. The surveyor observed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) administer oxygen at the prescribed flow rate, and b.) provide the resident with an appropriate oxygen delivery system while ensuring oxygen was handled and dispensed safely for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for respiratory care.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/11/26 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #14 in his/her bedroom lying in a lateral position with the head of the bed flat. The resident was receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula (NC) (a device used to deliver oxygen), connected to a portable oxygen cylinder in a cart. The regulator (a device attached to an oxygen tank or cylinder that controls and monitors the flow of oxygen) was set at 3 liters per minute (LPM), and the pressure gauge was in the red, indicating the tank required refilling. On 3/11/26 at 10:12 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #14 in his/her bedroom sitting in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure accurate medication dispensing and administration for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #52) observed during the medication pass. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/12/26 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor observed License Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 dispense six medications for Resident #52. As the LPN pulled medications from the medication cart, she handed them to the surveyor. The LPN handed the surveyor an over-the-counter (OTC) pill bottle of calcium carbonate 600 milligrams (mg) - vitamin D 10 micrograms (mcg) and then the LPN dispensed one pill from the bottle into the medicine cup. When the LPN finished dispensing the medications, she locked her medication cart and turned on the privacy screen on the electronic medical record. Before the LPN entered Resident #52's room, the surveyor asked the LPN to review the resident's medications with the surveyor. The LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure recommendations made by the pharmacy consultant were acted upon in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #3 and #61) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by: 1.) On 3/12/26 at 12:59 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #61 in their room. Resident #61 was alert and oriented and conversed with the surveyor regarding his/her care. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #61. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, reflected that the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, acute pulmonary edema, anxiety, and depression. A review of the pharmacy consultant's recommendations for February 2026 revealed the following recommendations: Please clarify the incomplete order for Dulcolax suppository, Fleet enema, Milk of Magnesia. The order lacks FREQUENCY. The manufacturer recommends a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the garbage container area free of debris and failed to cover 1 of 1 dumpsters. This was evidenced by the following: On 3/11/26 during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the dumpster area. The large green dumpster did not have a lid. The FSD told the surveyor it was delivered with no lid. Just past the dumpster in the same enclosed area the surveyor observed two mattresses, four wood pallets, and a reclining chair on the ground. The surveyor asked the FSD who was responsible for the maintenance of the trash surrounding the dumpster and he stated it was the responsibility of the housekeeping department. On 3/17/26 the surveyor, during an interview with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), asked why it was important for dumpsters to be closed and why there shouldn't be trash on the ground in the area. The LNHA said it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurately documented by not signing off medications immediately after administration for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #24, #52, and #77) observed during the medication pass. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/12/26 at 8:13 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 dispense and administer six medications to Resident #52. The nurse did not sign off the medications as administered when she returned to the medication cart, and instead moved on to the next resident. At 8:22 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #2 dispense and administer five medications to Resident #77. The nurse did not sign off the medications as administered when she returned to the medication cart, and instead moved on to the next resident. At 8:48 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #2 dispense and administer two medications to Resident #24. The nurse did not sign off the medications as administered when she returned to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to properly store the oxygen nasal cannula (NC) (a device used to deliver oxygen tubing) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for respiratory care, leaving the device exposed on a bare mattress. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/12/26 at 9:20 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #14's oxygen NC tubing was exposed to air, lying directly on the resident's bare mattress. The surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #14. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses including, but not limited to, metabolic acidosis (a medical condition in which the body produces too much acid, affecting the function of organs such as the heart, lungs, and kidneys). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment for facility staff. This deficient practice was identified throughout the kitchen and was evidenced by the following:On 3/11/26 at 09:20 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD). During the tour of the kitchen the surveyor observed that the floor was made up of four inch by four inch tiles throughout the kitchen. Tile size was confirmed with the FSD. During the observation of the three basin sink the surveyor noticed that 18 of the ceramic tiles were missing from the floor creating an uneven floor surface. The FSD acknowledged the missing tiles and told the surveyor, Sometimes they place mats over the area to make it safer. The surveyor then observed the steam table area. In front of the steam table the surveyor observed 14 broken tiles. Some had loose pieces, and some had missing pieces, creating an uneven floor surface. The FSD acknowledged the uneven floor surface. On 3/17/26 at 9:25 AM, during an interview with the Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ #'s: 170567 and 171267 Based on interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-resident ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 01/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes, indicated the New Jersey Governor signed into law P.L. 2020 c 112, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:13-18 (the Act), which established minimum staffing requirements in nursing homes. The following ratio (s) were effective on 02/01/2021: One (1) Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) to every eight (8) residents for the day shift. One (1) direct care staff member to every 10 residents for the evening shift, provided that no fewer than half of all staff members shall be CNAs, and each direct staff member shall be signed in to work as a CNA and shall perform nurse aide duties: and One (1) direct care staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This is a repeat deficiency Based on observations, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe consistent manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/6/24 from 9:46 AM to 10:50 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the kitchen in the presence of the Dining Director (DD): 1. The DD demonstrated use of the high temperature dish machine. The DD stated that the facility used a booster for the dish machine to reach the required rinse temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F) but sometimes the booster does not work so we always use a chemical sanitizer. The surveyor requested to see the dish machine temperature/sanitizer log. A review of log, Low Temp Dish Machine Temperature Log and PPM (Parts per Million) Log (LTDMTL/PPM) revealed that the dish machine log was not filled in on 11/5/24 prior to the dinner meal and on 11/6/24 the lunch meal was pre-filled in for the lunch meal which had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff implemented facility policies and procedures to ensure a.) residents were provided with care and services to achieve their highest practical wellbeing and, b.) the minimum State staffing requirements were met. This deficient practice was identified for and 2 out of 2 nursing units, and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F678, F684, F688, F698, F725, F804, F809, and F812 A review of the Administrator's job description provided by the facility revealed the following: The Administrator's primary purpose is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guideline, and regulations that govern long-term care facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to the residents at all times. Duties and Responsibilities included but not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) clarify and transcribe a Physician's Order (PO) for carrot hand splints (a type of splint that provides a barrier between the fingers and the palm to prevent injury to the palm from finger contracture) to the both hands, and b.) follow a physician's order for the application of a carrot hand splints to both hands, and c.) document in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #91) reviewed for positioning and mobility and was evidenced by the following: On 11/6/24 at 10:21 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #91 awake and alert, lying in bed with bilateral hands bent towards the chest and both hands clenched in a fist position without carrot hand splints in both fists. The surveyor observed two (2) orange carrot shaped hand splints lying on the overbed table. On 11/7/24 at 9:03 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. On 11/7/24 at 12:51 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record of Resident #306. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: acute osteomyelitis (bone infection), right ankle and foot, anemia (a low number of red blood cells) in chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid when the kidneys stop working properly). A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 5/27/24, included that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated that the resident's cognition was intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident received dialysis while a resident at the facility. A review of the resident's individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area dated 5/24/24, which indicated that the resident had a nutritional problem related to presents for right ankle wound; prior medical history diabetes mellitus (DM), end stage renal (kidney) disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ174562 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure palatable temperature of food for 1 of 1 lunch meal served on 1 of 2 units ([NAME] 600). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/7/24 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor conducted a meeting with the Resident Council which included five residents (Residents #9, #3, #48, #64, and #81). Four of the five residents informed the surveyor that the food was not served hot and was described as cool on both nursing units. On 11/12/24 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor observed the [NAME] who calibrated (process to make sure the instrument is taking an accurate temperature reading) a thermometer to 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F) before he proceeded to obtain food temperatures from the steam table. The [NAME] failed to document the food temperatures after he obtained them from the steam table. On 11/12/24 at 11:42 AM, the surveyor observed the Assistant Dining Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This is a repeat deficiency Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to serve residents a nourishing snack when there was more than a 14-hour span of time between the dinner and breakfast meal times. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #9, #33, #48, #64, and #81) interviewed during a meeting with the Resident Council and was evidenced by the following: On 11/7/24 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident council meeting with five (5) awake, alert, and oriented residents. During the meeting, 5 out of 5 residents stated that snacks were kept in the pantry and were not accessible during the evening shift to the residents. One resident stated, If we don't like our dinner, then we are hungry and need a snack at night. On 11/12/24 at 10:49 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Assistant Dining Director (ADD) who stated that there was a snack book on the nursing units with a list of all residents who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were served their meals in a manner that promotes respect and dignity during lunch. This deficient practice was identified for 6 out of 10 unsampled residents who were not served their meals at the same time and for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #40) who also experienced a significant delay in meal service delivery in the [NAME] 500 Dining Room. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/6/24 at 12:03 PM, the surveyor observed residents who were seated in the [NAME] 500 Dining Room who awaited meal service. On 11/6/24 at 12:09 PM, the surveyor observed that the food cart was delivered to the nursing unit and staff had begun to pass out trays to residents in their rooms. On 11/6/24 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor observed that three (3) of ten (10) residents were served lunch and had begun to eat while seven (7) other residents waited for their lunch. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their new hire policy to ensure reference checks were completed. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 10 employee files reviewed (Employee #1, #6, #8, and #10) and was evidenced by the following: A review of the employee files for reference check reflected the following: Employee #1, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), with a date of hire of 8/6/24, did not have a reference check on file. Employee #6 a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), with a date of hire of 1/24/24, did not have a reference check on file. Employee #8, a CNA, with a date of hire of 10/30/24, did not have a reference check on file. Employee #10, a Registered Nurse (RN) with the hire date of 7/29/24, did not have a reference check on file. On 11/12/24 at 1:03 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Human Resource Director (HRD), who stated two (2) references were done on every employee. The HRD stated we will not hold back an employee if we have not received all the references, but will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ172932 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) a resident-to resident altercation for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #310) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/8/24 at 11:46 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #310's closed medical record. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, unspecified mood [affective] disorder, persistent mood [affective] disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), insomnia, cognitive communication deficit, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 2/25/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident had verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ172932; NJ172314 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for a.) a resident-to-resident altercation, and b.) an injury of unknown origin. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #6 and #310) reviewed for abuse, and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 11/8/24 at 11:46 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #310's closed medical record. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, unspecified mood [affective] disorder, persistent mood [affective] disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), insomnia, cognitive communication deficit, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 02/25/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a resident hospitalization. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for hospitalization and was evidenced by the following: On 11/6/24 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #2 was not in their room. On 11/7/24 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #2. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a condition that makes it difficult to breathe), acute respiratory failure, and tobacco use. A review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 4/4/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. A review of the resident's individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2.) On 11/8/24 at 12:25 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #309. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: muscle wasting and atrophy, other abnormalities of gait (a person's manner of walking) and mobility and vascular dementia. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 1/24/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status score of 3 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident has one (1) fall with injury since admission. A review of the individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus area, dated 1/23/24, that the resident was a high risk for falls related to confusion, gait/balance problems, and unaware of safety needs. All interventions for that focus area were dated 1/23/24. A review of the Progress Notes (PN) included a Nurses Note (NN), dated 1/26/24 at 4:08 PM, which revealed the resident was found on the floor by a Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ172314 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an incident report and thoroughly investigate a resident's fall for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/6/24 at 9:51 AM, the surveyor observed staff providing care to Resident #87 in their room. On 11/6/24 at 12:34 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #87. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 8/7/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 1 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident had one fall with injury since the prior assessment. A review of the individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #NJ176585 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standard operational procedures in accordance with the facility policy for a resident with weight loss of five pounds or more for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #304) reviewed for nutritional status and was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: anemia (a lack of healthy, red blood cells), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) unspecified, major depressive disorder, recurrent without psychotic features, generalized anxiety disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy (to waste away), not elsewhere classified, muscle weakness, and tobacco use. A review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 7/12/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated that the resident's cognition was intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident was 68 inches tall and weighed 149…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was prescribed with a 14-day duration and re-evaluated for continued use for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/6/24 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 39, awake and alert, lying in bed with a family member at the bedside. The resident's spouse stated that the resident has been depressed and had started on Zoloft (anti-depressant) medications and has been getting seen by psychiatry doctor. On 11/7/24 at 8:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 39 lying in bed awake and alert with their breakfast tray on the over bed table. No behaviors observed at that time. On 11/7/24 at 11:58 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident # 39. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint# NJ166308 Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation on 1/5/24, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently serve hot foods at acceptable temperatures to the residents. This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 2 test trays on two different units ([NAME] 5 and [NAME] 6) and evidenced by the following: On 1/5/24 at 11:57 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Dietary Director (DD), observed the server at the steam table calibrate the digital thermometer before taking the temperatures of the prepared foods. The surveyor recorded the temperatures of the prepared foods on the steam table prior to service at 12:00 PM and the temperatures were as follows: Cheesesteak - 200 degrees Peppers/onions - 201 degrees French fries - 165 degrees Ground meat - 193 degrees Pureed vegetables - 188 degrees Mashed potatoes - 176 degrees Pureed French fries - 165 degrees Ground vegetables - 195 degrees Ground hash browns - 189 degrees On 1/5/24 at 12:20 PM, the surveyor, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain multi-use food-contact surfaces in a manner to prevent bacterial growth; b.) store potentially hazardous foods to prevent food-borne illness; c.) cool potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food-borne illness; d.) maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary manner; and e.) maintain cold food items to prevent food-borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/18/23 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed along the tour, the meat walk-in refrigerator's door was left ajar. The surveyor and FSD proceeded into the walk-in refrigerator and observed the ambient temperature to be 55 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The FSD stated refrigerators should be maintained at 41 F or below, and cold food should be held at 41 F or below. At this time, the FSD calibrated two thin probed digital thermometers in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed a.) to clarify a physician's order from 10/2/21 until 7/26/23 for dentures; b.) to apply and remove ace wraps (compression bandage) as ordered by the physician; c.) administer vitamin D3 in accordance to a physician's order; and d.) document on the Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record for residents in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 25 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice (Resident #62, #65, #66, and #79). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly dispose of a medication that fell on a contaminated surface and was previously cited during last standard survey and b.) ensure mediation was not left unattended at a resident's bedside. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed during medication pass observation (Resident #13), and was evidenced by the following: On 7/21/23 at 8:39 AM, the surveyor during medication pass observation observed the Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) on [NAME]-5 nursing unit prepare medication for administration for Resident #13 which included two (2) 1000 milligram (mg) capsules of fish oil (a supplement) and one ampule (vial) of ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution 0.5-2.5 mg (a medication used to treat symptoms of lung disease). During the preparation of the medications, the LPN dropped the fish oil capsules on the contaminated medication cart. The surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to serve residents a nourishing snack when there was more than a fourteen-hour span of time between the dinner and breakfast mealtimes. This deficient practice was identified for 10 of 10 residents sampled for bedtime snacks (Resident #2, #21, #43, #45, #47, #66, #100, #103, #104, and #564), and was evidenced by the following: During initial tour of the facility on 7/18/23 at 11:58 AM, Resident #45 informed the surveyor that he/she felt there was a long-time span between dinner and breakfast meals. The resident continued that he/she should receive breakfast around 8:00 AM, but usually received breakfast around 8:30 AM or 9:00 AM. On 7/21/23 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council meeting which included nine residents (Resident #2, #21, #43, #47, #66, #100, #103, #104, and #564). All nine residents informed the surveyor during the meeting that bedtime (HS) snacks were not offered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow appropriate infection control practices and perform hand hygiene as indicated during dining observation, b.) ensure respiratory equipment was kept in a clean and sanitary condition and stored properly to reduce the risk of infection, and c.) follow appropriate infection control practices and perform hand hygiene as indicated during a medication pass. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 2 nursing units ([NAME]-6) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #62) and for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medication pass (Residents #13 and #78.) This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/19/23 at 12:06 PM, the surveyor observed Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) who approached the covered food cart, removed a tray and entered Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA #1 placed the food tray on the bed side table (BST) of the resident in bed A; removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the confidentiality of a resident's health related information. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #78), and was evidenced by the following: On 7/21/23 at 9:00 AM, during the medication pass observation on [NAME]-5 nursing unit, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) walk away from the medication cart leaving the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #78 opened to full view. The MAR was displayed on a fixed laptop attached to the top of the medication cart located in the hallway. The medication cart was locked, but the LPN was not near the cart. At that time, the Staff Educator/LPN (SE/LPN) walked up to the medication cart and acknowledged the open MAR, and closed the screen removing Resident #78's health information from view. The LPN did not return to the medication cart and left the building. On 7/21/23 at 9:01 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) implement care plan interventions of bilateral floor mats for a resident with a history of falls and b.) develop a care plan for a resident who received nebulizer treatments. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 25 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #62 and #85), and the evidence was as follows: 1. On 7/24/23 at 10:05 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #85 receiving morning (AM) care. At that time, the surveyor did not observe any floor mats in the room. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #85. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2022 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease, major depressive disorder, history of falls, syncope (fainting or passing out) and collapse, unspecified fracture of right femur (thigh bone) subsequent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ165640 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans in a timely manner for a.) two residents (Resident #59 and #67) with significant weight loss and b.) a resident (Resident #45) with a change in bowel and bladder status. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 25 resident reviewed for revision of comprehensive care plans (Resident #45, #59, and #67), and the evidence was as follows: 1. On 7/18/23 at 12:14 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #59 seated in their wheelchair watching television. Resident #59 reported that they had an unintentional weight loss due their dislike of the facility's food. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #59. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2020, with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) perform complete and accurate skin assessments for visible facial injuries and b.) develop and implement an individualized comprehensive care plan with interventions for a resident's behavior of excoriating their skin. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for mood and behavior (Resident #80) and was evidenced by the following: On 7/18/23 at 11:02 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #80 in bed wearing a hospital gown. The surveyor observed a wound on the jaw on the left side of the resident's face. The resident stated to the surveyor he/she liked to pick at the scabs on their skin; that the nurse did not treat or bandage the area, but that would be a good idea. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #80. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility in October 2021, with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all medications were administered without an error of 5% or more. During the medication observation on 7/21/23, the surveyor observed three (3) nurses administer medications to four (4) residents. There were 35 opportunities, and three (3) errors were observed which calculated a medication administration error rate of 8.5%. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #65) that were administered medications by 1 of 3 nurses. The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 7/21/23 at 9:13 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepare medications for Resident #65 which included, Bactrim [DS] (double strength; an antibiotic), Depakote [DR] (delayed release; a mood stabilizer). At this time, the LPN stated the resident took their medications crushed in applesauce and proceeded to crush the medications and placed them into applesauce. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly label opened multi-dose medications, b.) ensure that out of date medications were removed from the medication carts where other current in use medications were stored, and c.) maintain proper temperature ranges for the medication refrigerators. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 medication carts and 2 of 2 medication refrigerators on 2 of 2 nursing units ([NAME]-5 and [NAME]-6) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/25/23 at 11:47 AM, the surveyor inspected the [NAME]-5 nursing unit medication cart identified as Cart 3 & 4, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1). There was an opened multi-dose insulin lispro pen that was not labeled with an opened date. The date on the bag for the insulin lispro pen was 6/1/23. There was a second opened multi-dose insulin lispro pen that was labeled with an opened date of 5/29/23. When asked about the two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ#: 164425 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe and appetizing temperatures of food for 4 of 4 entree meals observed during 1 of 1 meal observations (breakfast). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 7/21/23 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council meeting which included nine residents (Resident #2, #21, #43, #47, #66, #100, #103, #104, and #564). All nine residents informed the surveyor during the meeting that all meals served at the facility were cold, and that the facility did not offer to warm up cold food. Resident #21 stated if you asked staff to warm up your food, staff gave you an attitude. The residents stated that food will sit on the floor for at least ten minutes before staff will start to pass out meal trays. All nine resident confirmed the food tasted terrible and they wouldn't even give to their dogs. On 7/25/23 at 7:11 AM, the surveyor informed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$21,752 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,674 — penalty dated 2024-11-20
- $13,078 — penalty dated 2024-11-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JONATHAN BLEIER — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PREMIER CADBURY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/26/2016 |
| SMF CADBURY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/26/2016 |
| BLEIER, JONATHAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/26/2016 |
| SOD, YAAKOV | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/26/2016 |
| BANK LEUMI USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 07/26/2016 |
| SOFIA, LISA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/26/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315183. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.