Willow Terrace
One Penn Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19144 · For profit - Corporation · 174 certified beds · (215) 951-8500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $9,113 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-07)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.6% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.8% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 45.9% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.7% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.1%CMS range 27.8–45.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.0–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 43.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.3–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 174 beds and averages 166.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one of twelve residents reviewed (Resident R1) who was at risk for elopement. This failure resulted in Resident R1 exiting nursing unit via the elevator and walking out the front entrance doors. Resident R1 was unable to be located for over six hours. This failure placed the resident at high risk for injury and was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy of past non-compliance. (Resident R1)Findings Include:Review of facility policy, titled, Prevention and Management of Accident, Hazards Adequate Supervision, and Assistive Devices with a revision date of July 24, 2025, revealed, the facility will ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible, and that the residents will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent hazards. Continued review of the policy revealed, iii.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documents, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident R1 was free from physical abuse. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who was grabbed by a facility's employee by the collar, held in a choking position and placed (his/her) hand on the resident's face. The employee's hands had to be pried away from Resident R1's. A reasonable person would determine that a staff member holding a resident with a diagnosis of major depression and heart failure in a chocking hold caused actual harm, placing Resident R1 at risk for psychological trauma or one of five residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse Policy-Prevention and Management with review date of August 2025 revealed, The Facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation/exploitation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, visitors, etc.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from abuse, which resulted in actual harm to Resident R2 who was pushed by a nursing staff, fell to the floor and sustained an acute fracture of the distal radial metaphysis for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R2) Findings include: Review of facility policy, 'Abuse policy- Prevention and Management', dated September 8, 2022, reviewed on august 2024, revealed The Facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation/exploitation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, visitors, etc. The facility must provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion . Continued review revealed, abuse was defined as the willful infliction of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documents, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of ten residents reviewed were free from verbal abuse. (Resident R1)Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Policy-Prevention and Management last revised September 2022 states verbal abuse is defined as, Verbal Abuse- Oral, written, or gestured language, that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms, to the resident/patient or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe resident/patient, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to: Harassing a resident, Mocking, insulting, ridiculing, yelling or hovering over a resident, with the intent to intimidate, threatening residents, including but limited to, depriving a resident of care or withholding a resident from contact with family and friends, and isolating a resident from social interaction or activities.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility documents, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure to immediately protect a resident involved in a staff to resident abuse for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include:Review of facility policy title Abuse Policy-Prevention and Management review date 8/2025 revealed The Facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation/exploitation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, visitors, etc. The Facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation/exploitation of property. The facility must provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Continued review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, review of clinical record, review of facility policies, interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse is reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include:Review of facility policy title Abuse Policy-Prevention and Management review date 8/2025 revealed The Facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation/exploitation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, visitors, etc. The Facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation/exploitation of property. The facility must provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. This includes but is not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of facility documents and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to assess/evaluate a resident after an incident of physical abuse for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include:Review of facility policy title Abuse Policy-Prevention and Management review date 8/2025 revealed The Facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation/exploitation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, visitors, etc. Continued review of the facility abuse policy revealed that upon receiving reports of physical or sexual abuse the DON/designee shall immediately examine the resident. Findings of the examination must be recorded in the Resident's record: The nurse shall immediately notify the physician, and the resident/resident's representative. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was informed of and allowed to exercise their right to leave the facility Against Medical Advise (AMA) for one out of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident CL1). Findings Include:A review of the facility policy titled Discharge Against Medical Advice (AMA), last revised 6/2025, stated: A Discharge Against Medical Advice form must be completed when a cognitively intact resident/patient or the legally responsible party for a non-cognitively intact resident/patient insists on leaving the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA). The attending physician, CEO, and Director of Nursing must be notified immediately following each AMA.Review of Resident CL1's nursing notes indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], at approximately 6:30 p.m. with a diagnosis of anoxic brain damage. A nursing note dated the same day at 7:19 p.m. stated, [Resident CL1] is Alert and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff, reviews of hospital records and policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the behavioral health care and services to meet the needs of one of sixteen residents reviewed to ensure that each resident attained or maintained the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. (Resident CL1) Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled behavioral mental health care substance use services dated March 19, 2025, revealed that it was the policy of the facility to provide an interdisciplinary approach to substance use disorder, trauma, withdrawal, anger or behavioral symptoms which lead to negative consequences for themselves or other residents. The policies said that the facility would have sufficient staff who have the skill sets to meet the behavioral needs of the residents who have a diagnosis of mental health disorder, substance abuse disorder, trauma, increased withdrawal, anger or behavioral symptoms which lead to negative consequences for themselves or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, job descriptions, facility policy, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not investigate alleged violations or incidents related to a resident not being informed of and allowed to exercise their right to leave the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA) for one out of five residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Incident Reporting and Investigation of Accident Hazards, and Supervision, Assistive Devices, last revised October 2024, revealed the following:It is the policy of the Facility to monitor and evaluate any adverse occurrence that is not consistent with the routine operation of the Facility or the care of a resident(s). All accidents/incidents involving mistreatment, neglect, abuse, or injuries of unknown origin will be reported immediately to the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator (NHA) for further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, staff interviews and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weights, nutritional assessments, notifications to the physician of a significant weight loss were completed in a timely manner, and that nutritional interventions were implemented for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include:Review of the facility policy, Weight and Height Assessment and Interventions, with a review date of May 2025 indicated that any weight changes of greater than or less than 5 pounds within 30 days will be retaken the next day for confirmation with a licensed nurse confirming the reweigh. The policy stated that if the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietician in writing, and the attending physician/resident/resident representative will be notified of unplanned significant weight change .Continued review of the policy indicated that the dietician would respond within 72 hours or written notificationReview of the November 2025 physician orders included the following diagnosis:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, job descriptions, review of facility policy, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to ensure the safety of one of twelve residents reviewed (Resident R1) with a diagnosis of Dementia who eloped from the facility. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident R1 who was missing from the facility overnight for approximately six hours. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) with a revision date of June 15, 2023 states, Position Summary-this position is responsible to establish and maintain systems that are efficient and effective to operate the nursing home in a manner to safely meet residents' needs in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. Also, develop and maintain systems that are effective and efficient to operate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility records, interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities failed to maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81°F for four of four resident rooms. (301, 302, 311, 328) Findings Include: Interview with Resident R169 on January 28, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. with Maintenance Director, Employee E9 stated the room temperature was too high, and she was suffocating in the room. She stated she had COPD and would like the room temperature at 72-degree Fahrenheit. Interview with Resident R134 on January 28, 2025, at 11:35 a.m. it was too hot for her, and she needed fan to make her comfortable. Resident stated it's been a month since the facility had the temperature issue. Interview with Resident R151 on January 28, 2025, at 11:34 a.m. stated it was very hot in the facility. He stated it was very hard for him to sleep at night due to the heat. Interview with Resident R169 on January 28, 2025, at 11:39 a.m. stated it was always hot in the facility. She showed the heater…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents or their representatives were informed of treatment options, as well as the risks and benefits of the proposed care, for three of four residents reviewed for psychotropic medications (Residents R142, R139 and R158). Findings include: Review of Resident R142's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated November 14, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities), depression (mood disorder characterized by low mood, a feeling of sadness, and a general loss of interest in things) and psychotic disorder (loss of contact with reality). Continued review revealed that the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate evidence that a resident/resident representative grievance was promptly documented and resolved for one of 32 resident records reviewed. (Resident R110) Findings Include: Review of facility policy Grievance/Concern Form; Grievance/Concern Log revised October 28, 2021 revealed Our facility will assist residents, their representatives, family members or resident advocates in filing a grievance/concern form or completing a review on the customer service kiosk when concerns are expressed, which may not be able to be handled immediately by the facility staff, requires further investigation or requires consultation with other facility staff, the attending physicians or outside service providers. Any resident, his/her representative, family member or advocate may file a Grievance/Concern. Form or complete a review on the Customer service kiosk regarding treatment, facility services, Medical care, behavior of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with facility staff and residents and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report an incident of alleged sexual abuse to the State Agency and the Administrator as required for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R110). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting dated September 8, 2022, indicated that The Facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation/exploitation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, visitors, etc. The Facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation/exploitation of property. The facility must provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medication changes met professional standards of practice for one of four residents reviewed for psychotropic medications (Resident R158). Findings include: Review of Resident R158's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated November 21, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including non-traumatic brain dysfunction, delirium (confusion) and encephalopathy (brain damage). Review of medication administration records revealed physician's orders for olanzapine (antipsychotic medication used to treat certain mental health disorders, such as schizophrenia [loss of reality with delusions and hallucinations] and bipolar [severe high and low mood changes]) 7.5 m.g (milligrams) once per day at bedtime for delirium. The medication was administered November 15, 2024, through January 8, 2025.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that wound care practitioner recommendations were addressed appropriately for one of two residents reviewed for wounds (Residents R151). Findings include: Review of Resident R151's clinical record revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical record review for Resident R151 revealed a wound consultant report, dated January 22, 2025. The report indicated that the resident had a left shin wound with arterial etiology and a right distal shin wound with arterial etiology both wound was documented as full thickness wound. that was present on his readmission to the facility. The wound consultant recommended that the left shin wound be cleansed with 0.125% Dakin's solution (used to prevent and treat wound infections), treated with betadine (antimicrobial wound treatment) and leave it open to air. Further review of the wound consultant report recommended that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of care and services, clinical record review, interviews with staff and residents and reviews of facility policies, it was determined that facility failed to ensure that each resident received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision for one of two residents reviewed for communication needs. (Resident R138) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Clinical Manual, dated March 5, 2024 revealed that it was the responsiblility of the facility to make arrangements for each resident for needed vision services. The facility was also responsible to notify the resident's responsible party about the vision care and services that were needed. The policy also said that if the resident was in need of a vision consult that it would arrange for the consultation in a timely manner. Clinical record review for Resident R138 revealed a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] that indicated this resident's preferred language was Creole. The assessment also indicated that this resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that wound care practitioner recommendations were addressed appropriately for one of two residents reviewed for wounds (Residents R271). Findings include: Review of Resident R271's Entry MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated January 25, 2025, revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical record review for Resident R271 revealed a wound consultant report, dated January 27, 2025. The report indicated that the resident had a sacral pressure ulcer that was present on his readmission to the facility. The wound consultant recommended that the wound be cleansed with 0.125% Dakin's solution (used to prevent and treat wound infections), treated with medical grade honey (antimicrobial wound treatment) and calcium alginate (absorbent wound dressing that promotes healing), then covered with a bordered foam dressing. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed conduct smoking assessment to ensure the safety of a resident who smokes for one of 32 residents reviewed. (Resident R14) Findings include: Review of facility documentation revealed that the Resident R14 was a smoker, and the resident was included in the smoking list provided by the facility. Resident was added to smoking list with smoking privileges. Review of facility investigation for Resident R14 dated January 10, 2025, revealed that During this shift resident was observed on the floor sitting upright on his buttocks in front of the bathroom without his back brace or wheelchair in place. Resident was asked why he was on the floor at which the resident stated, I fell on the way back from the bathroom. Resident was then asked why he did not call for assistance to go to the bathroom at which he got out of bed to secretly smoked in the bathroom.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of clinical records, review of facility policy, staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain appropriate nutritional parameters for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident 65). Findings include: Review of facility policy Nutritional Assessment dated March 18, 2024, revealed The Facility will follow current professional standards of practice that recommend weighing the Resident on admission or readmission, the day following admission (to establish a baseline Weight), weekly for the first 4 weeks after admission and at least monthly thereafter to help Identify and document trends such as slow and progressive weight loss. Weighing may also be Pertinent if there is a significant change in condition, food Intake has declined and persisted (e.g. For more than a week), or there is other evidence of altered nutritional status or fluid and Electrolyte imbalance. Review of physician orders for Resident R65 dated December 16, 2024, revealed an order to weigh resident weekly for four weeks until January 20, 2025. Review of care plan for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure communication with the dialysis provider for one of two residents reviewed on renal dialysis (Resident R47) Findings include: Review of facility policy title Dialysis Management (Hemodialysis) dated March 28, 2024, revealed that the facility shall ensure that residents who require outpatient hemodialysis treatment have appropriate arrangements made by the facility with an outpatient treatment center to provide such service as directed by the physician. Further review of this policy reveals the facility to complete pre-dialysis information on the communication form and send with resident to dialysis on treatment days, to ensure communication of resident information and coordinate care between Dialysis Center and facility. Review of Resident R47 's record revealed Resident R47 entered the facility on June 9, 2022 with the diagnosis of end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidney ceases functioning on a permanent basis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a physician assessment was completed related to unplanned weight loss for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R65). Findings include: Review of facility policy Nutritional Assessment dated March 18, 2024, revealed The Facility will follow current professional standards of practice that recommend weighing the Resident on admission or readmission, the day following admission (to establish a baseline Weight), weekly for the first 4 weeks after admission and at least monthly thereafter to help Identify and document trends such as slow and progressive weight loss. Weighing may also be Pertinent if there is a significant change in condition, food Intake has declined and persisted (e.g. For more than a week), or there is other evidence of altered nutritional status or fluid and Electrolyte imbalance. The facility may identify key individuals who could Participate in the assessment of nutritional status and related causes and consequences. For Example,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that agency licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs related to medication administration practices and infection control practices, for three of three agency staff reviewed (Employees E7, E8, and E10). Findings include: Observation of the morning medication pass on January 29, 2025, at 9:38 a.m. revealed that Employee E8, licensed nurse, prepared and administered medications for Resident R132. Employee E8, licensed nurse, administered two of the resident's insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar levels) doses after the breakfast meal, instead of before the meal. Employee E8, licensed nurse, also administered two lidocaine patches (medicated patch to relieve pain) without allowing sufficient time between doses. This resulted in four medication errors. Interview with Employee E8, licensed nurse, revealed that she was an agency nurse and only worked at the facility sporadically. Employee E8,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff, reviews of policies and procedures and the Department of Human Services assessments, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and care plan for one of four residents reviewed with mental illness (Residents R17). Findings include: Reviews of the facility policy titled Behavioral-Mental Healthcare Substance Use dated May 7, 2024 revealed that the facility was to provide an interdisciplinary approach for the care of residents who have a diagnosis of mental health disorder and decreased social interaction. The policy also indicated that the facility must provide the necessary Behavioral Health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well -being of the residents in accordance with their assessment and care plan. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for one of four medication carts reviewed (fourth floor south medication cart), and failed to ensure that medications were readily available for administration for three of 32 residents reviewed (Residents R132, R55, and R142). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Narcotic Management dated revised December 24, 2024, revealed, Control/Schedule II-V medication will be counted with two (2) professional nurses at the beginning and end of each shift. Documentation that a count was completed and accurate will be completed at the beginning and end of each shift. Control/Schedule II-V medications will be logged into a bound book or separate master index page once received from the pharmacy as well as individual countdown records. Observation on January 29, 2025, at 10:44 a.m. with Employee E7, licensed nurse, of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than five percent for one of three residents observed during medication administration (Resident R132). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 12.5% based on observation of 32 medication administration opportunities with four errors observed. Review of facility policy, Medication Administration/Disposition dated reviewed December 2024, revealed, Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed by the physician. Facility staff involved in the administration of resident care will be knowledgeable of the policies and procedures regarding pharmacy services including medication administration. Medications, both prescription and non-prescription, shall be administered under the orders of the attending physician. Continued review revealed, Medications must be administered with one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that insulin pens and vials were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of four medication carts reviewed (fourth floor north medication cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Administration/Disposition dated reviewed December 2024, revealed, When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Observation on January 29, 2025, at 10:14 a.m. of the fourth floor north medication cart with Employee E8, licensed nurse, revealed the following: A lantus (long acting) insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar levels) pen for Resident R17 that was opened and undated; A lantus insulin vial for Resident R132 that was opened and undated; A lispro (rapid acting) insulin vial for Resident R95 that was opened and undated; and An admelog (rapid acting) insulin vial for Resident R83 that was opened and undated. Interview, at the time of the observation, Employee E8, licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility documents and resident clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement for two of three residents reviewed (Resident R147 and Resident R151). Findings Include: Review of Resident R147's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated May 6, 2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of non-traumatic brain dysfunction and cognitive communication deficit. Further review of the MDS, Section C - Cognitive Patterns (items in this section are intended to determine the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information - these items are crucial factors in many care-planning decisions), indicated that Resident R147 scored a 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain enhanced barrier precautions during wound care for one of one observations of wound care performed (Resident R271). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Transmission Based Precautions dated revised July 11, 2024, revealed, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in facilities. Continued review revealed that, EBP consists of the use of gowns and gloves for high-contact care activities which include . changing briefs and wound care. Review of Resident R271's care plan, dated initiated January 29, 2025, revealed that the resident had a sacral wound and to maintain enhanced barrier precautions. Observation on January 29, 2025, at 11:31 a.m. revealed that a sign was posted on Resident R271's door indicating that he required EBP. The sign instructed staff to wear a gown and gloves while providing high-contact care activities, such as wound and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain and follow physician orders related to medications, wound care and dietary recommendations for three of five residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Management - Unavailable Meds dated April 22, 2024, revealed, If a medication shortage is noted during normal pharmacy hours, a licensed nurse notifies the pharmacy and speaks to a registered pharmacist to determine the status of the order . if the next available delivery results in a delay or missed dose in the customer's medication schedule, take the medication from the emergency stock supply to administer the dose. If ordered medication is not available in the emergency stock, notify pharmacist that an emergency delivery is required . if an emergency delivery is not feasible, a licensed nurse contacts the attending physician to obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a dignified manner for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Transmission Based Precautions dated revised April 6, 2024, revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions are designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug resistant organisms in facilities. Continued review revealed that Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (such as central lines, foley catheters and feeding tubes). Further review revealed, Residents may share rooms with other residents who are not on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and residents may leave their rooms. Interview on September 11, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Resident R1 stated that a few weeks ago she overheard staff outside of her room saying, I'm not going in there, I don't know what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of facility records, observations, and interviews with residents and staff it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, homelike environment for one of four resident units observed. (Unit Three) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Temperature Extremes dated September 2017 states, The policy of [NAME] Terrace is to provide comfortable and safe temperature levels. The temperature throughout this facility shall be maintained at between 71 degrees and 81 degrees Fahrenheit. Any temperatures outside of this range requires specific intervention(s) to avoid potential negative impact on the residents' well-being. Should the A/C or heating system fail, specific monitoring and safety measures should be activated. Additional responses listed as, 1. Maintain a log of temperature monitoring. An initial tour was taken with the Director of Maintenance Employee E3 on July 17, 2024 at 9:40 a.m. A tour of the third-floor unit revealed several rooms above 81 degrees on the southside hall. The temperatures were taken in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to inform residents of tests results and the facility failed to follow-up on the result of test results resulting in a delay in providing resident of the test results for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of Resident R1's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set- a federally required resident assessment completed at a specific interval) dated April 3, 2024, section C0500 BIMS (brief interview for mental status) revealed that Resident R1 scored 15 suggesting that Resident R1 was cognitively intact. Review of resident diagnoses list revealed that resident had diagnoses of but not limited to Diabetes Mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), Anxiety Disorder, Depression Further review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that a test for Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C-a blood test that shows the average blood sugar during the past two to three months) was done on February 6, 2024. Further review of Resident R1's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and review of resident clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper accommodation of needs for one of 32 residents reviewed regarding appropriate bed size and mattress (Resident R17). Findings include: Review of Resident R17 annual MDS (an assessment of resident needs) dated January 22, 2024, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, diagnosed with a history of a cerebrovascular accident (stroke), arthritis, and quadriplegia. The MDS indicated the resident was impaired on one side of his upper body, both sides of his lower body, and was completely dependent on staff for bed mobility and all activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS indicated the resident was on a scheduled pain management regimen and reported the pain would frequently affect his sleep, and frequently interfere with his day-to-day activities, including therapy. The resident rated the intensity of his pain, an 8 out of 10 (ten being the worst level of pain). Further review of Resident R17's clinical record revealed a plan of care for chronic pain related from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with showers for three of five residents reviewed (Residents R96). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Refusal of Care, revised March 2024, indicated that the nurse will monitor for recurring refusals of medication, treatments, care and services. Further review revealed that the IDT team will meet with the resident/resident representative to ascertain the reasons why they are refusing care and services and will review and offer alternative interventions as appropriate. Interview with Resident R96's power of attorney on March 27, 2024, at approximately 2:00 p.m. revealed that Resident R96 was not provided assistance with showers. Review of physician orders for Resident R96 revealed that the resident was to receive showers on Mondays and Thursdays on the 7-3 shift. Review of Resident R96's current care plan, date-initiated September 7, 2023, revealed that the resident requires assist of 1 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who required respiratory care received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, and resident's plan of care for one of 32 resident records reviewed (Resident R96) Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, BIPAP CPAP revised May 2021 states, BIPAP and CPAP is administered by Licensed Nurses with a Physician's order . prescribed for some residents to augment resident breathing when they have difficulty maintaining adequate ventilation due to obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea and complex sleep apnea. Review of Resident R96's clincial record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (intermittent airflow blockage during sleep). Review of physician orders dated June 1, 2023, instructed to use the C-pap machine at bedtime and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health services in a timely manner to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for two of 32 resident records reviewed (Resident 18 and R61). Findings include: Review of Resident R18 clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnosis included Traumatic Brain Injury, Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, Unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances, Vascular Dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, Schizoaffective disorder, unspecified, Mood Disorder due to unknown physiological condition with depressive features, and unspecified Symbolic Dysfunctions, Review of Resident R18 psychiatric consultation dated August 9, 2023, indicated the physician recommendations were to monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of a resident by failing to assist in community placement options until completion for one of 32 resident records reviewed (Resident R61). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Discharge Planning Process dated March 2021, last reviewed April 2023 stated, The policy is to ensure that the resident has a planned program of post-discharge continuing care that takes his/her needs into account for a safe discharge. Discharge planning is interdisciplinary and is initiated preadmission, admission and continues through continum of care. Review of Resident R61's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility September 17, 2020, diagnosis included, Unspecified Dementia, Anxiety disorder, Major Depressive disorder, and insomnia. Review of Resident R61's Social Service note dated June 29, 2023, revealed Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet resident's needs including acquiring, receiving, and administering medications for two of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R17 and R96). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage/Unavailable Medications not dated, states when medications are not available the nurse will urgently initiate action. If delivery of the medication will be late or missed, take the medication from the emergency stock supply. If the medication is unavailable the nurse will call the physician for further orders. The policy further instructs to document missed doses on the EMAR (electronic medical record), document explanation for missed , See nurses notes for explanation. Document explanation of missed dose in the nurses note, describing the circumstance of medication shortage, notification of pharmacy and response and action(s) taken. Review of Resident R17 annual MDS (an assessment of resident needs)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and served at the proper temperature for one of five nursing units observed (third floor nursing unit) Findings include: Review of undated facility policy titled, Meal Tray Accuracy Audit Report Policy, indicated that for satisfactory result, all got items must be 135 degrees or higher and all cold items must be 45 degrees or below at point of service. Interview with Resident R119 on March 26, 2024, at 12:04 p.m. revealed that food is always cold and coffee is never hot. Observations during a test tray conducted with The Food Service Director, Employee E3, on March 27, 2024, at 12:58 p.m. revealed that the hot coffee registered at 133.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F); macaroni and cheese at 135.7 degrees F; green beans at 138.4 degrees F; mashed potato at 124.9 degrees F; milk at 56 degrees F; rice pudding at 62.8 degrees F; and cranberry juice at 61 degrees F. An interview with the FSD, on March 27, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed provide food items consistent with the prescribed diet order for one of four residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R149). Findings Include: Review of facility diet guide sheet revealed Tuesday lunch offerings on March 25, 2024, was Herb Rubbed Pork, Parley New Potatoes, Braised Cabbage, and Chilled Peas. Per the diet guide sheet, a resident on a mechanically soft diet (consisting of food that have been bended, mashed, pureed, or chopped, making them soft and easy to eat without biting or chewing), should receive ground herb rubbed pork, mashed potatoes, and pureed braised cabbage. Review of Resident R149's physician orders revealed the resident was ordered a Mechanically Soft Textured diet dated January 25, 2024. Dining observation conducted on March 26, 2024, at 1:16 p.m. revealed Resident R149's meal ticket confirmed that the resident was ordered a Mechanical Soft Diet. Further review of the meal ticket indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Uniform Policy, revised May 27, 2023, indicated that facial hair coverings will be worn to cover any and all facial hair. Review policy titled, Dating and Labeling Policy revised January 24, 2023, indicated that the kitchen will assure food safety by maintaining proper dated and labels to all goods and ready to eat food products . An initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted on March 25, 2024, at approximately 10:19 a.m. with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E3. Observations revealed that two kitchen staff were not wearing a facial hair covering. Observations in the reach in refrigerator in the main cooking area revealed that gravy and macaroni and cheese was unlabeled and undated; hashbrowns and peas were inappropriately dated with the month and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents and staff and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely provision of professional services furnished by outside providers, for one of 32 residents reviewed (Residents R17). Findings include: Review of Resident R17 annual MDS (an assessment of resident needs) dated January 22, 2024, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, diagnosed with a history of a cerebrovascular accident (stroke), arthritis, and quadriplegia. The MDS indicated the resident had an impairment on one side of his upper body, both sides of his lower body, and was completely dependent on staff for bed mobility and all activities of daily living (ADL). During an interview on March 27, 2024, Resident R17 stated he had a cardiologist appointment in July but couldn't get a ride to his appointment, so the facility cancelled it but did not reschedule another visit. Review of the nursing progress notes dated July 17, 2023, stated, Cardiology appointment cancelled. This was confirmed on March 27, 2024, at 4:00 p.m. with the Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the food and nutrition department, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential food service equipment in safe operating condition. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Dish Machine Usage Policy, revised November 15, 2023, revealed that dishwasher staff will monitor and record dish machine temperatures to assure compliance for wash and rinse cycles . FSD (food service director) or Designee will monitor temperature log and PPM readings prior to each usage for compliance. An initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted on March 25, 2024, at approximately 10:19 a.m. with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E3. Observations of the dish room revealed Dietary Aide, Employee E4, was utilizing the dish machine. Further observations revealed that the dish machine thermometers were not operating; FSD confirmed that the dish machine was not functioning properly. Review of the dish machine temperature log titled, Dish Machine Ware Washing- Low Temperature, revealed missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation of medication administration and staff interview, it was determined that the faciltiy failed to ensure that medications were administered timely for one of nine residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident had the diagnosis of aphasia (a disorder that results from damage to portions of the brain that are responsible for language). Continued review of the resident's clinical record revealed an order dated January 5, 2024 May crush medications unless contraindicated. Review of Resident R1's January 2024 physician's orders revealed an order obtained January 8, 2024 for Multivitamin-Minerals Oral Tablet (Multiple Vitamins w/ Minerals), give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for nutritional needs, wound healing, crush and serve with applesauce/fluids; Aspirin 81 milligrams oral tablet chewable (Aspirin), give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Cerebral Vascular Accident (order date 1/5/2024); Amlodipine Besylate oral tablet 5 mg, 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the accepted standards of practice for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Wound Vac Guidelines last reviewed October 2023, indicated, The Facility will utilize Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for specifically identified residents who meet criteria for use. A physician order is necessary to provide this treatment. There are numerous types of Wound VACs on the market; the Facility will utilize the equipment ordered by the physician. Nurses will be trained on the specific Wound VAC that the Facility is utilizing. Specific information regarding the equipment will be maintained and provided as a resource for the nurses. 1. Precautions for use: a. Precautions should be taken with active bleeding b. Difficult wound hemostasis c. Resident's on anticoagulant therapy d. Follow standard precautions e. When placing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policy and interviews with staff and residents it was determined the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and served at appetizing temperatures for one of four units reviewed. (Unit four) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Recording Food Temperatures Policy last revised 8/16/18 states, Purpose: To ensure the quality and safety of food are met by providing and maintaining proper food temperatures during meal service. 6. Hot food will be maintained at 135 degrees or higher. The facility failed to ensure all food was maintained at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or higher. Interview with Resident R2 on September 28, 2023 at stated that the food comes cold, they let it sit twenty to thirty minutes. The resident stated he eats all his meals in his room and the meals are cold. Interview with Resident R4 on September 28, 2023 at 10:20 a.m. revealed the resident stated that the meals here are cold. When asked which meals come cold the resident stated all of them. Interview on September 28, 2023 at 11:52 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities for two of 42 residents reviewed (Residents R268, R76) Findings include: Review of facility policy, Activity Manual dated reviewed April 2023, revealed that, The facility will provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community. Observation of the fourth floor nursing unit on May 30, 2023, at 10:38 a.m. revealed an activities calendar posted prominently in the hallway. An activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility documentation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate serving equipment to dietary staff during dining services to ensure that menu portions were properly served, on one of four nursing units observed (Fourth Floor nursing unit). Findings include: Interview on May 30, 2023, at 11:34 a.m. Resident R268 stated that food portions were too small. Interview on May 30, 2023, at 11:47 a.m. Resident R76 stated that not enough food was served during meals and that foods had poor presentation. Review of the posted menu on the fourth floor nursing unit on May 30, 2023, revealed that BBQ chicken, vegetarian baked beans, corn and chilled peaches were to be served at the luncheon meal. The alternate meal posted was beef hot dog on a bun, macaroni salad and cauliflower. Review of the facility's Diet Guide Sheet revealed that portion sizes to be served for the luncheon meal were: three ounces of BBQ chicken, four ounces of vegetarian baked beans, one ear of corn and four ounces of chilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility polices, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident the right to participate in the care planning process, of 42 residents reviewed (Resident R63). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Care Planning Process and Care Conference dated last reviewed May 2023, revealed, Care conference invitations will be given/sent to the resident/patient and resident representative if applicable, with date and time. Evidence of invitation should be maintained by the facility. The resident/patient should be encouraged to attend and participate. Resident R63 stated during interview on May 30, 2023 at 11:01 a.m. that he has not been invited to or involved in his care planning process and that he would like to be. Review of Resident R63's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated March 10, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a resident council meeting, resident interview, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the grievance forms were available and accessible to residents' locations on the nursing units for 4 of 4 nursing units observed. (Floor 3, 4, 5, 6) Findings include: A review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Grievance indicated under the Procedure section The facility will post information on how to file a grievance and information on the name, phone Number and contact information (including mail and email) for the facility grievance officer. Grievances may be received in writing, orally or anonymously. On May 31, 2023 at 10:23 a.m. an interview was held with Resident R319 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had expressed several concerns about dietary, housekeeping, and pest control. When questioned her if she knew the grievance procedure she reported no I don't. She also did not know about grievance forms being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not appropriately completed according to the resident assessment for two of three residents reviewed (Residents R58 and R268). Findings include: The PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) was created in 1987 through language in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and it has three goals: to identify individuals with mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure they are placed appropriately, whether in the community or in a nursing facility, and to ensure they receive the services they require for their mental illness or intellectual disability. The PASRR Level 1 must be completed on all persons who are considering admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility. A Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the Level 1 PASRR determined that the person is a targeted person with mental illness or an intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of eight residents reviewed (Resident R54 and R3) Findings include: Review of Resident R54's clinical record revealed the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease process that causes decreased ability of the lungs to perform). Review of Resident R54's May 2023 physicians orders revealed an active order for Budesonide - Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol 160-4.5 mcg/act (Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate, corticosteroid) to be administered twice daily; and Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 108 (90 base) mcg/act (Albuterol Sulfate, bronchodilator) to be administered as needed for wheezing. During medication administration observations on May 31, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. Licenced nurse, Employee E12, was unsure if Albuterol was the same as Budesonide. Employee E12, prepared to administer Albuterol inhaler as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received appropriate treatment and services for contracture management as prescribed for one of one residents reviewed for contracture management (R62). Findings include: Observation on May 31, 2023, at 10:10 a.m. revealed Resident R62 resting in bed. The resident was noted with contractures (permanent shortening of a muscle or joint) in his hands, arms and legs. The resident was not wearing any devices for contracture management, such as splints, hand rolls or braces. Review of an occupational therapy discharge summary for Resident R62, dated April 13, 2023, revealed that the resident received therapy services for bilateral wrist splints and bilateral elbow extension splints for contracture management. The therapist recommended to continue using the splints upon discharge. Review of a physical therapy discharge summary for Resident R62, dated November 2, 2022, revealed that the resident received therapy services for bilateral lower extremity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a physician assessment was completed related to unplanned weight loss for two of 33 residents with weight loss reviewed (Resident R21, R89). Findings include: Facility policy titled Nutrition Assessment indicates in the Procedure section #d. Physicians and non-Physician practitioners help identify relevant diagnoses, identify causes of weight changes and monitor the continued relevance of those interventions Review of clinical documentation for Resident R21 revealed that that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Astro-esophageal reflux (acid reflux when stomach acid repeatedly flows back into the tube connecting your mouth and stomach) and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the resident's weight documentation revealed that on October 20, 2022, Resident R21 weighed 153.5 pounds and on November 21, 2022, the resident weighed 127.8 pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff and resident interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bowel received care in a timely manner for one out of eight residents reviewed (Resident R4) Findings include: Review of Resident R4's clinical records revealed that the diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, chronic idiopathic constipation, urethral stricture, calculus of kidney, chronic obstructive pyelonephritis, acute kidney failure, other artificial openings of urinary tract status, urethral fistula. Review of R4's current care plan revealed a care plan for bowel incontinence 2/2 hx (history) of chronic bowel and impaired mobility. Interventions included: Check resident every two hours and assist with toileting as needed, provide pericare after each incontinent episode, observe pattern of incontinenc, and initiate toileting schedule if indicated. During interview with Resident R4 on May 30, 2023 at 12:20 p.m., the resident stated that facility has poor track record with answering call bells. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that adequate activities were provided, that medications utilized for the management of dementia were appropriately prescribed, and that an individualized, person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to address a resident's dementia care needs for one of 33 records reviewed (R102). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care Planning, dated May 6, 2023, revealed that the facility will develop a comprehensive, resident centered care plan for each resident. Care plan development, renewal and revision will be based upon the results of the resident assessment. Observation of Resident R102 on May 30, 2023, at 11:57 a.m. revealed the resident to be alone in his room wearing only an incontinent brief and no other clothing. The resident was laying in his bed and unable to engage in meaningful conversation with the surveyor. No opportunities for engaging independent activities were found in the room other than a small radio playing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriately textured foods to meet the needs of residents on a mechanically altered diet, on two of four nursing units observed (Fourth and Fifth Floor nursing units). Findings include: Review of facility diet and nutrition care manual related to puree diets, dated 2019, revealed that, All foods must be the consistency of moist mashed potatoes or pudding. Continued review revealed, It is important to make the diet look appealing. Review of the posted menu on the fourth floor nursing unit on May 30, 2023, revealed that BBQ chicken, vegetarian baked beans, corn and chilled peaches were to be served at the luncheon meal. Observations of the luncheon meal on the fourth floor nursing unit on May 30, 2023, from 12:32 p.m. through 1:49 p.m. revealed Employee E15, dietary aide, prepare the steam table in the dining room and began plating resident lunches at 12:59 p.m. Employee E15, dietary aide, was observed pouring pureed foods directly from containers onto…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the failed to maintain legible clinical records for 2 of 42 residents reviewed (Residents R21 and R268). Findings include: Review of Resident R268's psychiatric (mental health) consultation, dated May 22, 2023, revealed that the handwritten consultation note was not legible. Multiple lines in the Findings section of the note, including the physician's assessment and key notes during the consultation, were unable to be deciphered. Interview on June 1, 2023, at 10:39 a.m. revealed that Employee E11, unit manager, E18, licensed nurse, and the Nursing Home Administrator were unable to read all portions of the note and confirmed that Resident R268's psychiatric consultation was not legible. Review of clinical documentation for Resident R21 revealed that that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had unplanned weight loss on November 21, 2022 and needed to have a physician evaluation. On June 1, 2023, at 12:28 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$9,113 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-08-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JONATHAN BLEIER — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLEIER, JONATHAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 05/13/2018 |
| SOD, YAAKOV | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 05/13/2018 |
| SOFIA, LISA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 5% | since 05/13/2018 |
| THOMAS, KAREN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/13/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396129. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.