No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Deer Meadows Rehabilitation Center

8301 Roosevelt Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19152 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 206 certified beds · (215) 624-7575 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (215) 624-7575 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 20241 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2701 Holme Ave · (215) 624-4100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8200 Roosevelt Blvd · (215) 338-4967 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Acme0.1 mi
8200 E Roosevelt Blvd · (215) 338-8077 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.3%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight15.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.2%25.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.6%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.5%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.9%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.751.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.531.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 310 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 198 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.9%CMS range 38.7–51.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 9.9–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.7–9.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
42.1%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 206 beds and averages 194.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-23)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that all interventions to prevent fall incidents were in place after Resident R48 was transfer into bed, resulting in actual harm to Resident R48 who fell out of bed and sustained a fractured jaw for one of three residents reviewed for falls. (Resident R48) Findings include: Review of facility policy Fall Prevention and Management, revised 2023, revealed an Avoidable Accident is interpreted as an accident occurred because the facility failed to: - Identify environmental hazards and/or assess individual resident risk of an accident, including the need for supervision and/or assistive devices; and/or - Evaluate and analyze the hazards and risks and eliminate them, if possible, or if not possible, identify and implement measures to reduce the hazards/risks as much as possible; and/or - Implement interventions, including adequate supervision and assistive devices,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one resident with unwanted sexual behavior received adequate supervision to prevent wandering for three resident records reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of Resident R1 clinical records revealed the resident was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses of unspecified psychosis (a mental health condition involving impaired thinking, altered perception, hallucinations, delusions, or disorganized behavior), adjustment disorder ( excessive behavioral responses to identifiable stressors, leading to impairment in daily functioning), with anxiety and depressed mood, unspecified dementia (cognitive decline), with behavioral disturbances.Review of Resident R1 clinical record revealed a nursing note dated May 19, 2026, that stated Resident R1 was found in Resident R2's room. Resident R2 was sitting on the edge of the bed and Resident R1 was standing in front of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews with residents and staff it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and through investigation related to potential verbal abuse for one out of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include:Review of the facility policy Abuse Policy-Prevention and Management, revised September 8, 2022, indicated that the facility will begin the investigation process immediately upon notification of the incident and will prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress. Continued review of the policy indicated that upon receiving an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of an unknown source, the Administrator/DON/designee will conduct an investigation to include, but not limited to: completing paperwork for investigation of abuse, neglect, misappropriation; interviewing the person(s) reporting the incident; interviewing any witnesses to the incident;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews with staff, review of facility investigation and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of nine residents reviewed received proper assistance during transfer from chair to bed, which resulted in a fall incident and a skin tear to the left leg. (Resident R1)Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled, Fall Prevention and Management with a date of January 12, 2023, states, The interdisciplinary team identifies and implements appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries while maximizing dignity and independence. Determining causal factors leading to a resident fall is necessary to provide consistent intervention to help prevent further occurrences. Further review of the facility policy revealed, Implement goals and interventions with input from resident/family if able for inclusion in the interdisciplinary Plan of Care based on individual needs after attempting to determine possible causes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean and homelike condition in one of eight nursing units (Dementia Unit 2nd floor). Findings include: Facility Policy titled Housekeeping Operational Manual revised on 11/2024, revealed under Bed Washing and Disinfecting it stated to control odor, to prevent the spread of infections and bacteria and to ensure maximum cleanliness and sanitation for the individual resident. Bed disinfecting is performed on a monthly basis (in conjunction with complete room cleaning).Observations on September 29, 2025, at approximately 11:54 a.m. indicated that Unit Manager, Employee E10, confirmed a strong and heavy odor of urine on the dementia unit between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS].Observations on September 30, 2025, at 12:48 p.m. on the dementia unit near room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a strong odor of urine. Licensed Nurse Employee E8 confirmed the strong and heavy odor of urine near room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, interview with staff and resident, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS (Minimum Data Set) a federally required resident assessment completed at a specific interval) was completed accurately for one of thirty-five residents reviewed. (Resident R143) Findings include: Rearview of Resident R143's clinical record revealed that Resident R143 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Review of Resident Review of Resident R143's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed that section B0200, Hearing was coded as ADEQUATE Review of hearing evaluation dated July 25, 2025, revealed that Resident 143 was seen for an audiometric hearing evaluation. Further, the hearing evaluation revealed moderate - severe hearing loss in both ears. Further review of Resident R143's clinical record, revealed a care plan for Communication Problem r/t Hearing deficit Ability to hear initiated on January…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based ln observation and review of clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission for one of thirty-five residents observed. (Resident R13)Findings include:Review the facility policy for Care Planning Process and Care Conference with the most recent revision date of March 19, 2025 reveal that under section POLICY: To foster the philosophy of the facility in compliance with federal and state regulations and in accordance with HIPAA regulations, the facility will develop a comprehensive residence center care plan for each resident/patient. the RNAC (registered nurse assessment coordinator)/CRC (clinical reimbursement coordinator) will be responsible for the coordination and implementation of resident care plan. Under section PROCEDURE: #1. an interdisciplinary baseline care plan will be initiated upon admission by the admitting nurse and completed within 48 hours. Review of resident R13's clinical records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan related to dementia care and/or activities for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R55).Findings include:Review of facility policy, Care Planning Process and Care Conference dated revised on March 19, 2025, revealed The resident/patient centered care plan development will include the following interdisciplinary team members: Resident Nurse Assessment Coordinator/ Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator (RNAC/CRC), Nursing, Rehabilitation, Dietician, Food Service staff member, social worker, nursing assistant, physician(if applicable), Activities, resident and resident representative. Further review revealed Procedure: Include such initial needs/problems such as ADL's, falls, skin tears, risk for skin breakdown, nutritional status, behaviors, pacemakers, anticoagulants, psychotropic medication use, etc. Include a care plan related to the resident's primary diagnosis. Review of Resident R55's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and interviews with residents, and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain proper grooming for one of the four residents reviewed (Residents R153)Findings include:Review of Resident 153's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of disorder of muscle, spinal stenosis (abnormal narrowing of the spinal canal that results in pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots causing pain and numbness in arms and legs),A review of Resident R153's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident care needs), dated July 20, 2025, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, reflecting cognitive intact. The functional abilities section of the MDS indicated that Resident R153 requires partial/moderate assistance with showering tasks.A comprehensive care plan dated, June May 02, 2025 indicated an Activity of Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for two of eight ([NAME] 2 nursing unit and W1B nursing unit).Findings include:Based on the facility policy titled, Activity Manual last revised on April 2025 revealed Activity program are designed to meet the interest of and support the physical , mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident.During a review of activity calendar on September 29, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. the following activities were scheduled for the Skilled Nursing and Rehab nursing unit:11:00 a.m. Concentration Puzzle -GA1:00 p.m. Room visit2:00 p.m. BingoObservations on September 29, 2025, between 11:35 a.m. and 1:35 p.m., on the W1B nursing unit revealed that Resident R3 was sitting in a wheelchair in front of the TV in the main area.During a review of activity calendar on September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of clinical records it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that urinary drainage systems were properly positioned and maintained to prevent urine backflow and urinary tract infection for one of ten residents observed with urinary catheter. (Resident R13)Review of facility policy on Catheter-Foley with a review date of July 2025, section Procedure revealed that under section POLICY: this policy provides the procedure to ensure the safe sterile placement and removal of the folly catheter it also provides guidelines for catheter care and specimen collection from the catheter under section PROCEDURE #V. Completing the Procedure: #2. Position the bag to avoid urine reflux into the bladder, kinking or gross contamination of the bag. Position the bag hanger on the bed frame near the foot of the bed using the clip to secure the drainage tube to the sheet always keep the bag below the level of the bladder to prevent the back flow of urine and decrease the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a physician assessment was completed related to unplanned weight loss for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R19).Findings include: Review of clinical documentation for Resident R19 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of dementia (progressive disease of the brain), muscle weakness, dysphagia and Type 2 diabetes (failure of the body to produce insulin). Review of the resident's weight documentation revealed that on August 8, 2025, the resident weighed 132 pounds. The resident was weighed again on September 1 , 2025, and weighed 123.2 which is a -6.67% Loss. The resident was weighed again a month after on October 7, 2025, the resident weighed 121.8 pounds.Review of Resident R19's Weight Warning Note from September 9, 2025 states, Value: 123.2 triggering for significant weight loss -6.7 x1 mo. Please weigh to confirm. Wt. (weight) loss unplanned. Currently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for one of three residents observed during medication administration (Resident R137).Findings include:On September 30, 2025, 9:40 a.m., observed that Employee E4, a Licensed Nurse, administered to Resident R137, one tablet of Geri-Dryl Allergy Relief by mouth, and one tablet of Benadryl Allergy Oral Tablet 25 MG (Diphenhydramine HCl), by mouth; along with other medications.On September 30, 2025, 10:20 a.m., review of physician orders for Resident R137 indicated an order dated August 8, 2025, for the following: Benadryl Allergy Oral Tablet 25 MG (Diphenhydramine HCl), Give 1 tablet by mouth. No physician order to administer one tablet of Geri-Dryl Allergy Relief by mouth was available.Review of literature indicated as follows: Geri-Dryl is essentially the same as Benadryl. Geri-Dryl contains 25 mg of diphenhydramine hydrochloride in each tablet, acting as an antihistamine.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to submit complete and accurate information to the State Survey Agency regarding a resident fall for one of three residents reviewed for facility reported incidents (Resident R48). Findings Include: Review of facility reported incident, dated January 11, 2025, revealed nurse aide was assisting Resident R48 with evening care. After CNA transferred resident to bed she/he took the wheelchair away from the side of the bed towards the door in resident room to make space for her to assist resident with evening care. Resident was placed at center of the bed. Then suddenly she heard the noise and observed the resident lying on the floor. Upon arrival, the charge nurse observed resident lying on the floor beside her bed. Resident was observed bleeding from her mouth. Resident was then transferred to ER and diagnosed with closed fracture of maxillary bone. Further review of facility reported incident revealed all fall precautions were in place at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview with staff, review of clinical record and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure to maintain clinical records in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three clinical records reviewed. (Resident R2) Findings include:Review of Resident's R2 Minimum Data Set (MDS), completed July 6, 2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact.Further review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed a medical diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sepsis (blood infection), acute respiratory failure, acute pulmonary edema, and pleural effusion (fluid build up in the lungs).Review of physician orders revealed an order was placed on June 13, 2025, at 3:44 p.m. for vital signs q (every) shift x 30 days, indicating facility time code: 7am - 3pm, 3pm - 11pm, 11pm - 7am. Further review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed no evidence of vital signs were documented on June 14, 2025, during the night shift 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based review of clinical records, facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice and physician orders, to prevent infection one of 3 residents reviewed for Intravenous Therapy. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of Facility Policy titled Monitoring and Removal of Midline Catheters and PICC lines revealed at established intervals (upon insertion, upon admission, every 5-7 days during dressing change, PRN (as needed) or per specific facility protocol) document results in medical record. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of, but not limited to, orthopedic aftercare, local infection of skin, Type 2 Diabetes (failure of the body to produce insulin), and sepsis (infection of the blood). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician order dated April 4, 2025, to change PICC line (a thin flexible tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of the physical environment, interviews with staff and reviews of the pest control operators reports, it was determined that the facility was not maintaining an effective pest control program on one of eight nursing units. Findings include: On March 10, 2025, at 10:06 a.m. observation made on unit [NAME] 1 in the hall roaches killed by unit manger, Employee E3. On March 10, 2025, at 10:10 am interview with unit manger, Employee E3 confirmed concerns related to in the nursing unit. On March 10, 2025, at 10:12 am interview with Resident R5, revealed an observation of many roaches and mice crawling in her room. Observation in resident room roaches baited that were full of roaches. On March 20, 2025, at 11:32 a.m. interview with Resident R6 also reported seeing roaches and bugs in his room. A review of the pest control reports for the past two months revealed the following: On February 7, 2025, go throughout the [NAME] 1 for roaches. On February 25, 2025, reported mice activity in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medications timely, resulting in significant medication error for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Administration/ Disposition, revised September 2023, revealed medications should be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Facility staff involved in the administration of resident care will be knowledgeable of the policies and procedures regarding pharmacy services including medication administration. Medications, both prescription and non-prescription, shall be administered under the orders of the attending physician or the physician's designee. Further review of facility policy revealed medications must be administered in accordance with the written physician orders, including any required timeframe. Medications must also be administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meals). May not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records and facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice and physician orders, to promote healing of pressure ulcers and prevent development of pressure ulcers for four of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcer. (Resident 53, Resident R90, Resident R277 and Resident R14) Findings Include: Review of facility policy Wound Management Guidelines revised April 1, 2022, revealed residents will receive the appropriate treatment for their skin issues as identified in the type of skin/wound presentation and the indicated treatment and interventions for the identified issues. Further review of facility policy Wound Management Guidelines revealed the nurse will identify the impairment and stage, if indicated/applicable, based on the skin assessment. The nurse should notify the physician of findings and identify the appropriate treatment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of clinical records, facility investigation, interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity related to the right to retain and use personal possessions for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R34) Findings Include: Interview with Resident R34 on November 20, 2024, at 12:15 p.m. stated when he was at the dialysis on November 19, 2024, facility staff searched his room, went through his personal possession, took his over-the-counter medications, and discarded some of the food items that was in the refrigerator in his room without his permission. Resident stated he never had staff search his room or remove his personal possession without permission and he has been a resident of the facility for over on year. Resident stated the search was due to state survey in the facility. Continued interview with Resident R34 stated he called the administrator when he returned from the dialysis and the administrator told the resident that the staff removed medication from his room. Resident also stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels for one of eight units in the facility ( [NAME] Pavilion Second Floor). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Temperature Extremes last reviewed in November 2021 states it is the policy of the facility to provide comfortable and safe temperature levels. The same policy states, Temperature throughout this facility shall be maintained at between 71 degrees and 81 degrees F. Any temperature outside of this range required specific interventions to avoid potential negative impact on the residents' well-being. On November 19, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. on [NAME] Pavilion Second Floor nursing station the surveyor recognized the unit was uncomfortably warm. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11 said, This is nothing, it gets even hotter. Interview with the Director of Maintenance, Employee E12 on November 19, 2024, at 12:28 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care for a dependent resident for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R18). Findings Include: Review of Resident R18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated September 25, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, diagnosed with heart failure, high blood pressure, cerebrovascular accident (Stroke) and dementia. Further review indicated the resident had impairments on both sides of his upper body and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Observation of Resident R18 with Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E11 on November 21, 2024, at 10:15 a.m. stated the resident clenches his hands and uses a palm guard because his hands are contracted. The LPN opened Resident R18's hands to reveal his bilateral palms were a deep red color. Further observation revealed the resident fingernails were significantly long and required trimming. The LPN indicated it was difficult to trim his nails short…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement fall interventions for two of five residents reviewed for falls (Resident R4 and R110). Findings Include: Facility policy titled Fall Prevention and Management (revised January 2023), indicated that the interdisciplinary team identifies and implements appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries while maximizing dignity and independence. An effective way for the facility to avoid accidents is to develop a culture of safety and commit to implementing systems that address resident risk and environmental hazards to minimize the likelihood of accidents. Clinical record review revealed Resident R4 was admitted to the facility June 28, 2024 with a diagnosis that included but not limited to Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (inability of lungs to exchange oxygen and high levels of carbon dioxide properly), Cognitive Communication Deficit (communication difficulty caused by a cognitive impairment), and anxiety disorder. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, review of clinical record, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and modify interventions consistent with the resident's assessed needs to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of seven residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R162). Findings Include: Review of facility Weight Policy revised 04/03/2017, revealed residents should be weighed at least monthly, unless otherwise specified, and that any confirmed weight change should be reported to the physician and registered dietitian for their evaluation and recommendations. Review of Resident R162's care plan revised October 7, 2024, revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in nutrition/hydration. Interventions dated October 7, 2024, included to obtain weights as ordered and monitor PO (by mouth) intake. Review of Resident R162's clinical record revealed a physician note dated November 8, 2024, that the physician was requested by staff to assess Resident R162 for poor appetite. The physician recommended a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, observations, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician for two of four residents receiving oxygen therapy. (Resident R4, Resident R149) Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen (revised September 2023), revealed oxygen therapy is to be administered by licensed nurses with a physician's order to provide a resident with sufficient oxygen to their blood and tissues. Clinical record review revealed Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosese of Type 2 Diabetes (insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Hyperthyroidism (thyroid gland makes too much thyroid hormone). Review of Resident R4's physician orders, dated June 1, 2023, revealed that Resident R4 was order oxygen therapy at 2 liters via nasal cannula. Observation on November 19, 2024 at 10:25 a.m. revealed Resident R4's oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide culturally competent, trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice, accounting for the resident's past experiences and preferences in order to eliminate and/or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident two of 35 sampled residents (Resident R34 and R106 ). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R34 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses of anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of Resident R34's hospital discharge instructions received on admission, dated June 23, 2023, indicated psychiatry was consulted for reporting black outs in context of PTSD. Prior to this hospital stay, the hospital records reported the resident was hospitalized previously for suicidal ideation, alcohol abuse, depression and PTSD from working as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the care of urinary catheters and respiratory care equipment for four of 35 residents reviewed. Findings Include: Observation of Resident R135 on November 19, 2024, at 10:32 a.m., revealed that the resident had a urinary catheter. Further observation revealed that the catheter bag was on the floor. Observation of Resident R17 on November 19, 2024, at 10:25 a.m., revealed that resident's oxygen tubing which was connected to oxygen concentrator was lying on the floor without any bag. Observation of Resident R61 on November 19, 2024, at 10:28 a.m., revealed that resident's urinary catheter bag and the tubing was on the floor mats, it was observed that the Nurse Aide who was providing care to the resident was stepping on the floor mat while the catheter tubing and bag was on it. Further observation revealed that there was nebulizer machine and tubing on windowsill. The nebulizer mask and tubing were not bagged, and it was directly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observations, interviews, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents for two of eight units in the facility ([NAME] Pavilion first and second floor). Findings include: On November 19, 2024, at 11:33 a.m. surveyor observed a live roach in [NAME] Pavilion second floor nursing station. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E11 said, It happens a lot. The LPN indicated when staff observed pests, they document their findings in the maintenance book. Review of the maintenance book, the LPN stated the last time the area was treated for pest was on October 22, 2024. Further review of the maintenance book revealed documented sightings of roaches and mice on the unit since last treated. On November 21, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. surveyor observed additional pest sightings with Unit Manager, Registered Nurse, Employee E7. Observations on November 19, 2024, at 12:42 p.m. revealed multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the food and nutrition department, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential food service equipment in safe operating condition. Findings Include: Review of facility procedure titled, Resources dated unknown indicates conduct safety and operation inspections 1. Visually inspect all appliances for damage 2. Inspect electric cords and connections 3. Check Filter hoods above stove 4. Check C02 tank storage containers 5. Test functionality of appliances and proper operation of al controls 6. Lubricate per manufacture's specs as needed. 7. Inspect all tethered gas fed appliances. Document findings in log book 1. Remove damaged items from kitchen use 2. Note any discrepancies 3. Note any service repairs and maintenance in TELS equipment log. An initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted on July 25, 2024, at approximately 9:35 a.m. with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E3 and Administrator, Employee E1 revealed the main kitchen grill as essential food service equipment had 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and review of clinical record, it was determined that facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication error related to administration of medications prepared for a different resident. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Medication Administration', reviewed January 2024, indicates that the individual administering medications must verify the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. Methods of identifying the resident include: a. Checking the identification band b. Checking photograph attached to medical record; and c. If necessary, verifying resident identification with other facility personnel. Further review of policy indicated medications ordered for a particular resident may not be administered to another resident, unless permitted by state law and facility policy, and approved by the Director of Nursing Services. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility documents, clinical records review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of misappropriation of resident property for one out of 10 residents reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Prevention last revised October 2020, indicated The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family , friends, etc. The facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. Review of the facility information submitted to the state Survey Agency dated May 15, 2024, indicated that certified nursing aide, Employee E3 misappropriated Resident R1's property by ripped off her magazine picture that were hanging outside of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a meal tray test results, review of facility policy and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to serve foods that were palatable and at proper temperatures for one of eight nursing floors reviewed. (Ground Wing C) Findings include: Review of facility document Food and Nutrition Services Test Tray and Accuracy Evaluation, revised on January 3, 2024, revealed that the standard temperature for food items as below: Soup- greater than or equal to 135-degree Fahrenheit. Milk- lesser than or equal to 45-degree Fahrenheit. Hot- entrée greater than or equal to 135-degree Fahrenheit. Starch- greater than or equal to 135-degree Fahrenheit. Vegetable- greater than or equal to 135-degree Fahrenheit. Hot Beverages- greater than or equal to 135-degree Fahrenheit. Cold Beverages-lesser than or equal to 45-degree Fahrenheit. Dessert- lesser than or equal to 45-degree Fahrenheit. Review of resident council meeting minute dated April 11, 2024, revealed that the residents complained that the food was bad. They stated that they complained about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, review of facility documents, staff and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to uphold the dignity of two of eight residents (Resident R25 and Resident R85) and during dining service for one of eight nursing unit reviewed. ([NAME] 2 nursing unit) Findings include: Review of the facility document titled Abuse Policy last revised February 8, 2022, revealed verbal abuse is defined as oral, written, or gestured language, that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms, to the resident/patient or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe resident, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. Continued review of this policy revealed the protocol for any abuse allegations including screening, training, prevention, identification, protection, investigation, employee suspension, reporting to the appropriate agency, and the facility is to ensure that the appropriate corrective, remedial or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed accommodate the residents' needs related to having a bariatric bed and beside chair for 1 out of 35 residents observed. (Resident R41) Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] , 2023, with diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (failure of the body to produce insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease process that causes decreased ability of the lungs to perform), end stage renal disease. Review of the Resident R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of care needs) dated January 23, 2024, revealed that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident R41's weight record revealed that the resident weighed on 290.1 pounds on February 10, 2024. On February 12, 2024, at 2:07 p.m. an interview was conducted with Resident R41 who reported that he desires a bigger…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents on one of eight nursing units. ([NAME] 2 Nursing Unit) Findings include: During the initial tour of the [NAME] 2 nursing unit on February 12, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., the following observations were made, -Next to the nurse's station (lower number resident rooms), there was coffee cups, a cup of water and a clear cup on the on the handrail. - There was used socks, trash and food like substance throughout the hallway. -Next to the dining room closet there was trash on the floor appeared like used napkins, sugar packets and food particles on the floor. -Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]A had a bed side table next to the bed which had a black substance on the table which appeared like dried food or drink. -Next to the nurse's station with higher number resident rooms, there was white powder like substance on the floor, - Resident bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER]A had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans related to supervision needs for one out of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R381) Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Care Planning Process and Care Conference last revised July 3, 2023, revealed facility will develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for each resident. Care plan development, renewal and revision will be based upon the results of the resident's assessment. The care plan is a working tool that provides a profile of the needs of the individual resident. The care plan will include the initial needs such as adls (activities of daily living), falls, skin tears, nutritional status, behaviors, anticoagulants, psychotropic medication , related to the resident primary diagnosis . The care plan is a working tool that provides a profile of the needs of the individual resident. Further review of this policy revealed that all resident care and interventions must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the care plan for participation in restorative therapy for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R166). Findings include: Review of Resident R166's care plan revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of high blood pressure and chronic peripheral venous insufficiency (poor circulation of the extremities). Further review of the resident's care plan revealed the resident was on the restorative program to prevent functional decline dated August 31, 2023. Interventions included transferring out of bed to the wheelchair with one person assisting the resident. Interview with Resident R162 on February 14, 2024, at 11:30 a.m. stated she no longer participates in restorative therapy. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 14, 2024. at 3:30 p.m. confirmed the facility failed to revise and update Resident R166's care plan when the resident no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, review of facility documents and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's orders were followed for two of 35 records reviewed. (Resident R4 and Resident R116) Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee (degenerative joint disease affecting both knees due to natural wear and tear), disorder of muscle, unspecified atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), and congenital deformity of the spine (refers to an abnormality present at birth that affects the structure or alignment of the spine). Review of Resident R4's February 2024 physician orders revealed an order dated February 1, 2024 cleanse RLE (right leg) w (with)/NSS (normal saline solution), pat dry, apply silvedene and calcium alginate, wrap w/kerlex and cover Tubi grip BID (twice a day) and PRN (as needed). On February 12, 2024, at 2:07 p.m. an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of resident's clinical record, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the appropriate supervision related to risk of aspiration for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R 381) Findings include: Review of Resident R38'1s clinical record reveal that Resident R381 was admitted in the facility on February 6, 2023, with diagnoses of pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs of one or both lung) COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, is an inflammatory lung disease that cause obstructive airflow from the lungs) and dysphagia (a medical term meaning difficulty swallowing which is a symptom of many different medical conditions). Continued review of Resident R 381's clinical record revealed a dietary initial assessment which indicated that there resident was to have a mechanically altered diet consisting of pureed textured foods and thin liquids. Further review of this assessment stated that Resident R381 needed supervision while eating meals. Continued review of Resident R 381's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records and facility policy, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of 21 residents reviewed. (Resident R104) Finding Include: Observation of Resident R104 on February 12, 2024, at 10:42 a.m, revealed that the resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula from a portable oxygen concentrator (machine). The oxygen was set at 4 liters per minute. This was verified by Employee E2, Registered Nurse Unit Manager. Review of physician orders for Resident R104 on April 16, 2023, revealed an order to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously. Interview with Employee E12, on February 12, 2024, at 10:42 a.m. confirmed that the resident was receiving oxygen at 4 liters per minute and the resident should be receiving oxygen at 2 liters per minute. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriately textured foods to meet the needs of residents on a mechanically altered diet for one of 22 residents observed during dining (Resident R158). Findings Include: Review of the clear liquid diet guidelines from the facility's diet manual revealed the diet consists of foods that are clear and liquid, or that becomes liquids at room or body temperature. The diet contains no milk or milk products. Review of Resident R158's physician order dated January 25, 2024, revealed the resident was ordered a clear liquid diet. Continued review of Resident R158's physician orders revealed an order dated October 15, 2023, to provide a pureed snack at bedtime. Review of Resident R158's administration record for November 2023 through February 2024 revealed the resident was routinely offered the nighttime pureed snack with 50-100% consumption. Review of Resident R158's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in accordance with food safety standards for one of eight nursing unit pantry's ([NAME] 1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Pantry Refrigerator, revised September 2021, revealed pantry refrigerators will be monitored on a routine basis to ensure food safety. Refrigerator temperatures will be maintained at 32 to 41 degrees Fahrenheit and freezer temperatures will be maintained at 0 to less than or equal to -10 degrees Fahrenheit. Further review of facility policy revealed refrigerators will be checked on a routine basis for cleanliness and cleaned monthly or as needed. Review of facility policy Food from Home, revised July 2017, revealed it is the policy of the facility to provide safe and sanitary storage and handling of all food including food brought to residents by family and other visitors. Further review of facility policy revealed foods requiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with resident and staff, review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one resident who concent to received the Covid -19 vaccine was provided the vaccine in a timely manner for one of 35 resident records reviewed (Resident R166). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Covid-19 vaccines and booster vaccines revised in [DATE] stated all vaccines shall be offered to residents unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated, to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against Covid-19 by minimizing the risk of acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from the Corona virus. The policy continues to state that residents who received the vaccine will have the vaccine administration documented in the resident's Vaccine Administration Record (VAR) . Review of Resident R166's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with high blood pressure and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe sanitary and functional environment for one resident and four resident rooms of two floors (Second floor dining room and First Floor Rehab). Finding Include: Interview with Resident R116 on February 12, 2024, at 10:27 a.m. stated his wheelchair leg rest was broke and part of the leg rest was missing foot pad. He stated it was like that for almost four months. Observation of Resident R116's wheelchair revealed that the left side leg rest was missing foot pad which exposed sharp metal edges. Wheelchair also had white color substance underneath the seat on the metal frame appeared like dust and cobb [NAME]. Observation of resident rooms 208, 209 and 210 revealed that there was window air-condition unit on the windowsills. There was wash cloths and towels around the air conditioning unit. Interview with Resident R116 on February 12, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., stated he was keeping the towel to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected residents' cognitive status for 3 of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R158, R64, and R66). Findings Include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long Term Care RAI Manual dated October 2019 revealed the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) included Section C: Cognitive Status which is used to determine the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to registry and recall information. Review of Resident R158's clinical record revealed a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. Review of Resident R64's clinical record revealed an Annual MDS dated [DATE]. Review of Resident R66's clinical record revealed a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. Review of Section C: Cognitive Pattern for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JONATHAN BLEIER — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BLEIER, JONATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/01/2014
SOD, YAAKOVIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 12/01/2014
SOFIA, LISAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2014

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$27.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 49%Medicare 8%Other / private 43%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$271per resident / day
operating cost
$8,248per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$266per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395425. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next