No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westchester Center For Rehabilitation & Nursing

10 Claremont Ave, Mount Vernon, NY 10550 · For profit - Corporation · 240 certified beds · (914) 699-1600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (914) 699-1600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0570)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0570)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10 Fiske Pl Ste 231 · (914) 667-0023 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
G3525 S SAGINAW St · (810) 406-4868 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
15 S Fulton Ave · (914) 371-7504 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8 Bradford Rd · (914) 813-6990 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.1%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%19.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.4%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%6.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.9%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.0%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.2%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.7%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.601.701.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.161.361.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
87.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 87.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.4%CMS range 23.4–46.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.3–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge87.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge83.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge85.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.5–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.321.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
34.6%
Total nursing turnover
42.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 230.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-29)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2022-03-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during a Recertification and Abbreviated survey (Case #NY00276712) conducted from 3/14/22-3/21/22, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property for 1 (Resident #119) of 5 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #58 exhibited abusive behaviors toward staff and Resident #119. The facility did not ensure adequate supervision for each resident knowing Resident#58 had a history unpredictable recurring aggression and resident to resident altercations. As a result, Resident #58 pushed Resident #119, causing Resident #119 to fall and sustain a fracture of the wrist. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #119 that was not immediate jeopardy. . The findings are: Abuse, is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interviews during the Abbreviated Survey (2633933) on 10/21/2025-10/22/2025, the facility did not ensure that the resident's representative was notified timely of an incident for (1) one (Resident #1) of (3) three residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, on 09/27/2025 Resident #1 had an episode of aggressive altercation with staff resulting in the need for Resident #1 to be sent out for psychiatric evaluation. The resident's representative was not informed of the incident until they visited and were informed by the resident who was visibly upset about the incident. The finding is:The facility's policy titled, Notification of Changes, last revised on 08/2024, documented it is the policy to notify the resident/designated representative when there is an accident/incident involving the resident. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, legally blind and cellulitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 09/07/2025 documented the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident was independent with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey 1/22/25-1/29/25 the facility did not ensure that garbage was contained and disposed of in an appropriate manner. Specifically, the trash compactor had food spilling out of it and the recycled boxes were not maintained within the dumpster. Findings include: An inspection of the dumpster and trash compactor area was conducted on 01/29/25 at 3:24 PM and revealed the dumpster to have the lid open with card bard boxes littered out of the dumpster and onto the ground around the dumpster including up to five feet away from the dumpster. The compactor was observed to have an approximate area of three (3) feet by four (4) feet of food and debris spilling out. A clear plastic bag hanging over the side of the opening of the compactor and what appeared to be various vegetables, rice, paper and plastic food and beverage containers were littered on the ground. When interviewed on 1/29/25 at 3:30 PM, the Food Service Director stated it should not look that way. The boxes should have been broken down and put inside of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey from 1/22/2025 to 1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure a surety bond was purchased to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. This was evident for 106 residents with Personal Needs Accounts during review of Personal Funds. Specifically, the facility's Surety Bond for $250,000, was less than the sum total of 106 resident personal needs accounts maintained by the facility in the amount of $278,452.49. The findings are: The facility's Continuation Certificate issued by their indemnity insurance company documented a bond for was in force for any loss occurring from 11/1/2024 to 11/1/2025 that did not exceed $250,000. The Continuation Certificate was signed and dated 8/6/2024. The facility Resident Personal Needs Account Ledger documented the sum total of 106 resident accunts managed by the facility was $278,452.49. There was no documented evidence the facility's surety bond was sufficient to cover the entire amount of resident's funds managed by the facility. On 1/29/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview conducted during the recertification survey 1/22/25 to 1/29/25, the facility did not post in a place readily accessible to residents, and family members and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) survey. Specifically, the survey team did not observe survey results posted anywhere in the facility. In addition, members of the Resident Council were interviewed and reported that they did not know where the survey report was posted or accessible for residents to review. Findings include: The facility policy Clinical Manual - Social Services Manual revised 11/2024 documented: Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident right to Examine Survey Results. Related to the Posting of Survey Results documents that it is the policy to post the most recent New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) survey results, and the plan of correction, as per federal and state requirements. Place readily accessible is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 01/22/2025 to 01/27/2025, the facility did not ensure that 3(Residents #226, #333, and #96) of 3 Residents reviewed for Respiratory Care was provided with such care, consistent with the professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, 1. Resident #226 who had a Physicians order for Oxygen to be administered via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute, was observed multiple times with the Oxygen rate not consistent with the Physicians' order, and with the tubing disconnected from the Oxygen concentrator. 2. Resident #333 who had a Physicians orders for Oxygen to be administered via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute, was observed multiple times with the Oxygen rate not consistent with the Physicians' order, and the facility did not address the Ear, Nose, and Throat recommendations to give Resident #333 humidified oxygen until 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated surveys (NY00337247)) from 01/22/25 to 01/29/25, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, 1. Upon review of the nursing staffing schedule from 12/22/24-1/29/25, for multiple days, on all three shifts of staffing for each unit, the facility did not provide adequate staffing to meet the needs of the residents, and as per their Facility Assessment, 2. On multiple dates during the night shift on the 2 South Unit, there were only two Certified Nurse Aides scheduled which was not consistent with the Facility assessment that documented that there should be a minimum of three certified nurse aides. Also, on multiple dates during the day shift on the 2 South Unit, there were only three Certified Nurse Aides scheduled which was not consistent with the Facility assessment that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 1/22/25-1/29/25, the facility did not ensure certified nurse aide performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months for 4 (#'s 14, 25, 32, and 33) of 5 Certified Nurse Aides reviewed for certified nurse aide performance reviews. The findings are: The facility policy titled Competencies revised 06/2023 documented that the facility will conduct job related competencies based upon the Facility Assessment and on employee job description/evaluation. The facility will provide education required for Nurse Aides of 12 hours per year for re certification. Competencies will be conducted by return demonstration method. Written testing may be completed in conjunction with the return demonstration. Upon review of for Certified Nurse Aide #14's performance review dated 9/27/24, there was no documented evidence that it was signed/dated by employee, immediate supervisor, department head, and dated by Human Resources. Upon review of for Certified Nurse Aide #25's performance review dated 1/13/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/22/25-1/29/25, the facility did not ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items were not properly sealed and dated in the kitchen walk in refrigerator, freezer, dry storage, and unit panty refrigerator; outdated food was not disposed of when expired; and food was not served at appropriate temperature. Findings include: The facility policy Receivable and Storage Policy revised on 9/2023 documented: Ensure all foods are securely covered, dated, and labeled. The facility policy Food and Nutrition Services revised on 7/18/23 documented: Meals will be provided in a timely manner so that hot foods are served hot and cold foods are served cold. The facility policy Food From Home - Procurement reviewed on 8/2024 documented: It is the policy of this facility to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of all foods including those brought to residents by family and other visitors. The initial inspection of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/22/25-1/29/25, the facility did not ensure that the Certified Nurse Aides were provided the required 12 hours of training and annual in-services on dementia care management and resident abuse prevention, to ensure safe delivery of care. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that 5 (#'s 14, 25, 32, 33, and 34) of 5 Certified Nurse Aides reviewed for Nurse Aide training, were provided 12 hours of mandatory training. The findings are: The facility policy titled Sufficient Staffing last revised on 7/1/23 documented that the facility will ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. During an interview on 01/29/25 at 10:11 AM, the Staffing Educator was unable to provide documented evidence that 12 hours of training and annual in-services were completed for Certified Nurse Aides #'s 14, 25, 32, 33, and 34. Multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Recertification survey from 01/22/2025 through 01/29/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified dining experience for 2 of 35 residents (Residents #168, #14) reviewed for dignity while dining. Specifically, facility staff were observed standing over Residents #168 and #14 while assisting the residents with their meals. The findings include: The facility policy titled Feeding the resident last date reviewed 9/2023, documented the facility staff will sit while feeding resident, no standing while feeding for those residents requiring feeding assistance, unless necessary. Staff should be at eye level with the resident while feeding. 1. Resident #168 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, non-Alzheimer dementia, and malnutrition. The 11/28/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (a resident assessment tool) documented Resident #168 had moderately impaired cognition and needed supervision assistance with eating. During an observation on 1/22/25 at 12:50 PM, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY#00336657) surveys from 1/22/2025 to 1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's designated representative had the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of treatment options and to choose the alternative or option they preferred for 1 (Resident # 233) of 2 residents reviewed for resident rights. Specifically, the facility administered Donepezil (a medication for dementia) to Resident #233 and the resident representative had requested the medication to not be given. Findings include: Resident # 233 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Rights, revised 11/2024, documented the resident rights to be notified of his or her medical condition and of any changes in his or her condition; A resident has the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other Practitioner or professional, of the risks and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 1/22/2025 to 1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of their needs and preferences. This was evident for 1 (Resident #167) of 7 residents reviewed for Environment. Specifically, Resident #167's wheelchair was unable to maneuver around their bed preventing Resident #167 from being able to access and use their own bathroom. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Rights dated 11/2024 documented a resident has the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. Resident #167 had diagnoses of postherpetic polyneuropathy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #167 was cognitively intact. The Comprehensive Care Plan related to activity of daily living function - mobility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00352407) from 1/22/2025 to 1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's right to receive written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room was changed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) of 7 residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #10's Health Care Agent did not receive written notice of or explanation for the resident's room change on 10/11/2024. The findings are: The facility policy titled Transfers - Room Changes dated 4/11/2024 documented the facility will inform the resident and/or resident representative of the room change both verbally and written, including the reason for the change, the effective date of the change and the location of the change. Resident #10 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and cerebral infarction with right hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00344201) from 1/22/2025 to 1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's right to manage their financial affairs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #182) of 3 residents during Personal Funds review. Specifically, the facility diverted Resident #182's income to a personal needs account managed by the facility without informing the resident's court-appointed Legal Guardian. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Rights dated 11/2024 documented residents had the right to manage their personal funds. Resident #182 had diagnoses of unspecified dementia and schizoaffectove disorder. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #182 was severely cognitively impaired, the resident and their family participated in the assessment, the resident's family provided discharge status information, and did not document that Resident #182 had a Legal Guardian. The admission Agreement dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/22/25-1/29/25, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #333) reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #333 was receiving continuous Oxygen, and the facility was unable to provided documented evidence that a Respiratory/Oxygen Care Plan was in place. The findings are: The facility policy titled Care Planning Process and Care Conference last revised on 7/2023 documented that the facility will develop a comprehensive, resident centered care plan for each resident/patient. Care plan development, renewal and revision will be based upon the results of the resident assessment. The care plan is a working tool that provides a profile of the needs of the individual resident/patient; the resident/patient care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review during the recertification survey from 1/22-1/29/24 the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #92) reviewed for insulin. Specifically, Resident #92's insulin order had a dicrepency and the order was not being followed as written. Findings include: Resident #92 had diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, End Stage Renal Disease, and Seizure Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (assessment tool) dated 11/13/2024 documented Resident #92 with moderate cognitive impairment. Medications received included hypoglycemic and injections on 3 days. The Comprehensive Care Plan for Diabetes Mellitus dated 12/3/24 documented the resident would be free of observable signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Interventions included administering medications as ordered and monitoring for signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. A Physician order dated 12/18/24 documented Humalog Kwik Pen (U-100) Insulin 100unit/ml subcutaneous,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards, including expiration dates when applicable for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms, and 1 of 4 med carts reviewed. This was evident for 2 (Medication Storage Rooms 3 South Unit and 2 North Unit) of 2 medication storage rooms and 1 of 4 medication carts observed. Specifically, the 3 South Unit and 2 North Unit Medication Storage Rooms had an expired box of hydrocolloid wound dressing and an expired box of safety needle, the 3 South Unit medication cart contained an open and undated 32 ounce bottle of supplement. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Storage last reviewed on 2/2024 documented the facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 1/22/25 through 1/29/25, the facility did not ensure that staff maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions; and 2 of 10 staff reviewed for influenza vaccinations. Specifically, 1) Resident #483 was on Enhanced barrier Precautions and staff was observed providing care without wearing proper protective equipment. 2) Licensed Practical Nurse #17 and Certified Nurse Aide #15 did not receive the influenza vaccine and were observed not wearing a mask. Findings include: 1. The facility policy titled General Infection Transmission- Based Precautions revised date 1/1/2024 documented the use of transmission-based precautions (isolation precautions) to manage specific, highly transmissible, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the recertification survey from 1/22-1/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents' financial records were available to the residents through quarterly statements for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for personal funds. Specifically, Resident #92 was not aware that they had any personal funds and the facility financial office was not able to provide proof that the resident received quarterly statements. Findings include: Facility Policy titled Resident's Funds last reviewed 10/2024 documented 24/7 access to funds, maintaining and managing resident accounts, and process for accessing funds. It did not document a process for providing residents with quarterly statements. Resident #92 had diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, End Stage Renal Disease, and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition, and the resident and family participated in goal setting. During an interview on 1/23/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00341327, NY00358946), the facility did not provide adequate supervision/monitoring to prevent accidents for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #3 & #10) reviewed. Specifically, (1) Resident #3 who had a history of suicidal attempts and cut their left wrist sustaining a laceration that was unwitnessed by staff on 05/04/2024 was placed on 1:1 monitoring following the incident had no documented 1:1 monitoring. Resident #3 was found by Certified Nurse Aide with blood on his gown and on the floor on 5/5/2024 and was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. The investigative summary concluded Resident #3 used a pointed pencil to harm self; (2) Resident #10 who had severe cognition impairment and had history of multiple falls sustained a head injury from an unwitnessed fall on 10/09/2024 and was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation Resident #10 had falls with no injury on 02/18/2024, 04/09/2024, 04/22/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00351516) from 8/19/24 to 8/20/24, the facility did not ensure a resident's preferences were incorporated in developing care plan goals for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically, when Resident #1 was placed on comfort care, the facility did not include the designated representative (family) in pain management care planning. The findings are: The Facility policy, 'Pain Management', last reviewed 8/24 documented the facility is committed to reducing physical and psychosocial symptoms associated with pain. The interdisciplinary team works with the resident and significant others to establish a plan of care that will address the individual resident goals for comfort and function. The Resident/family will be included in the evaluation of pain, potential interventions and determine resident's pain goal and acceptable level of pain. The facility will develop, review and /or revise the resident' plan of care as needed, communicate interventions to all staff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00351516) from 8/19/24 to 8/20/24, the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was placed on Comfort care without a plan for pain management. The family requested morphine for pain on 8/9/24 and 8/10/24 because the resident was in pain. There is no documentation that the facility staff consistently assessed the resident to determine their pain/comfort level and the need for alternate medication. The findings are: The Facility Policy, titled 'Pain Management', last reviewed 8/24 documented the facility is committed to reducing physical and psychosocial symptoms associated with pain. The facility promotes resident self-reporting as the most reliable indicator of pain. The interdisciplinary team works with the resident and significant others to establish a plan of care that will address the individual resident goals for comfort and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00311197) the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for physical abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 reported they were shoved by Certified Nurse Assistant #1 that on 2/20/2023 at 12am. Resident #1 tried to show the Certified Nurse Aide how to operate the overhead light and Certified Nurse Assistant #1 shoved Resident #1 with their shoulder onto the bed in the resident's room. Finding include: A review of the abuse policy-prevention and management dated 3/2016 and last revised 9/8/22 documented the facility prohibits the mistreatment and abuse of residents by anyone including staff. The Facility has designed and implemented processes which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse. The Facility must provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Asthma, Syncope and collapse and lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00311197, NY00332234) the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated and the results of the investigation reported to the New York State Department of Health, in accordance with State law within 5 working days of the incident for 2 (Resident #1, #4) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 reported that they were shoved by a Certified Nurse Aide on 2/20/23 at approximately 12 AM in their room, when trying to show them how to work the overbed lighting of their roommate. The facility did not provide documentation of the completed investigation and no report was submitted to the New York State Department of Health. 2) Resident #4 reported to Certified Nurse Assistant #5 that on 1/25/2024, Licensed Practical Nurse #2 pinched them on the left lower leg. The facility did not provide any statements obtained from Resident #2's roomate and staff and Licensed Practical Nurse #2 contiued to to provode…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00311197), the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised for 1 (Resident #1) out of 3 residents reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident #1's abuse care plan was not updated to reflect an allegation of abuse on 2/20/2023. Finding include: A review of the abuse policy-prevention and management dated 3/2016 and last revised 9/8/2022 documented the facility prohibits the mistreatment and abuse of residents by anyone including staff. The Facility has designed and implemented processes which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse. The Facility must provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. Resident #1 had diagnoses including asthma, syncope and collapse and other lack of coordination. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 2/4/2024 documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Score (BIMS) Score of 15/15, indicating cognitively intact. The resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00303362) the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for accident. Specifically, Resident #1 upon admission was scored as a mild fall risk and there was no documented evidence of any safety measures or assistive devices in place for use to prevent an accident. Resident #1 subsequently had a fall on 10/12/2022 and sustained a left wrist fracture and a laceration to the left eye. Finding include: A review of the facility's undated fall prevention/bed alarm/chair alarm/risk management policy under philosophy documented residents will be assessed on admission, readmission or whenever a change in condition occurs, for risk factors to prevent accident/incidents. Subsequently, an individualized plan of care will be formulated in conjunction with the comprehensive care plan that identifies risk factors and intervention of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, a urine filled catheter bag was observed with no covering and visible from the unit hallway for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity (resident #155) . The findings are: Review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Catheter-Foley, dated 4/2021, documented when catherization is determined to be clinically indicated, staff should maintain the resident's privacy and dignity. The policy also documented infection control considerations; do not allow catheter bag or tubing to lay on floor. Resident #155 was readmitted on [DATE] with a medical history of multiple strokes with left hemiplegia and dysphagia. Resident's baseline functional status was bed bound and eye movement. Review of physician orders dated 1/26/22 documented an order for foley catheter, and 1/27/22 documented daily foley catheter care with soap and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Record review Observation and Interview conducted during a Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (#292469) the facility did not ensure that a person-centered comprehensive care plan (CCP) was developed and implemented to meet the resident's goal, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for positioning/mobility (#82) and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care (#102. Specifically, 1) no CCP was developed and implemented to address the resident's range of motion and contractures (Resident #82), and 2) no CCP was developed and implemented for the nebulizer treatment ordered by the Physician to address the resident's Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)/Shortness of Breath (SOB) (Resident #102). 1) Resident # 82 was admitted to the facility 02/16/2018, with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Alzheimer's Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Seizure Disorder, Muscle weakness (generalized). The Annual Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification/complaints survey, the facility did not ensure that needed services, care and equipment are provided to assure that resident with limited range of motion and mobility maintain or improve function based on the residents' clinical condition. Specifically, a resident with contractures on both upper extremities was not provided with the splint device as per order, this was evident for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for Limited ROM, (Resident #82) The findings are: The facility's Policy for Use of Assistive Devices dated 07/2015, last revised 08/27/2021, documented that the nurse or designee in accordance with the Rehab Team will assess the resident periodically to determine the need to continue the use of the mobility device. Resident #82 was admitted to the facility 02/16/2018, with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Alzheimer's Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Seizure Disorder, Muscle weakness (generalized). The Annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification / Complaint survey (NY00292469)), the facility did not ensure infection prevention control practices were followed to help prevent the spread, development, and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, 1) nebulizer tubing was observed in the resident's room not properly protected from infection, with no label, and there was no documented evidence that the tubing was changed, this was evident for 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care, (Resident #102). 2) the facility failed to ensure that the glucometer was sanitized between resident's use, a nurse was observed using 1 glucometer to perform blood glucose check on the residents without sanitizing the meter in between use for the residents, this was evident for 3 residents observed for blood glucose check/insulin administration, (Resident #126, #141, & #53). The findings are: - The facility Policy and Procedure for Handheld Nebulizer/Small Volume…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the most recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that care was provided in accordance with the written Plans of Care addressing pain management and nutrition for 2 of 40 sampled residents (Residents #9 and #131) reviewed. Furthermore, the facility did not ensure that interventions for catheter care and maintaining skin integrity were identified in the Plans of Care for 2 of 40 sampled residents (Residents #205 and #407). Specifically, Resident #9 was not being monitored for the presence of pain in terms of location and intensity as directed in the Plan of Care; Resident #131 was not provided the dietary supplements or additional water as directed in the Plan of Care. Interventions necessary for the monitoring and care of a surgical wound as well as a skin ulceration were not included in the plan of care for Resident #407. Additionally, interventions for the care of a Foley catheter were not included in the plan of care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review during a recertification survey, the facility did not implement effective monitoring procedures to ensure the resident assistive equipment remain free from a repeat accident hazard. Specifically, the corrective action plan did not provide a consistent monitoring action by the laundry staff to effectively test and track Hoyer lift pads after they have been washed and dried. These are the findings Resident #169 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 06/19/2018 with diagnoses of Hypertension, chronic pain, anemia, Parkinson's disease. MDS (minimum data sheet, an assessment tool) annual assessment 06/05/2019 indicates the resident is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Resident #169 requires a two-person assist with transfers to wheelchair. Review of an accident record dated 05/05/2019 shows that Resident #169 sustained a thoracic spine compression fracture and a hematoma to the side of her head secondary to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during the recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure proper sanitation and food handling procedures were implemented to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. Specifically, potentially hazardous food items delivered to the facility were not put away in a timely manner; the walk-in freezer was packed up to the door and leaving no space for air to circulate around the items and the dishwasher was not sanitizing dishes or utensils during the final rinse cycle. The findings are: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 7/9/19 at 9:30 AM the facility was in the process of receiving a food delivery. At the time of the tour there were multiple boxes of food on the floor, not in the freezer. Among them were fresh beef and chicken. Observation of the freezer at that time revealed the temperature was 45 degrees F. Surveyor inspection in the presence of the Food Service Manager showed ice buildup on the floor and ceiling, the boxes in the freezer were wet and ice cream was soft. The Food Service Manager was interviewed at that time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview conducted during a Recertification Survey the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, Physician's Orders and facility's policy. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #169), 1 of 3 residents (Resident #406) reviewed for pain management, 1 of 6 residents (Resident #407) reviewed for Skin Impairment and 1 of 5 residents (Resident #179) reviewed for the administration of medications. Specifically, Resident #169 sustained a fall from a Hoyer lift and did not receive timely treatment and care for complaints of pain. Resident #407 did not receive timely treatment and care for a left heel ulcer or monitoring and treatment for left upper leg staples; and Resident #179 had critically elevated potassium level for which medication was not promptly provided as per physician's order. The findings are: 1. Resident #169 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review observation and record review conducted during the most recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 1 resident (Resident #205) reviewed for indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received the appropriate care and services. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the resident who was admitted to the facility with a Foley catheter received catheter cares and urine output monitoring in accordance with the Care Plan. The findings are: Resident #205 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Renal Insufficiency, Anemia, and Hyperkalemia. The 6/14/19 admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) indicated Resident #205 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14. Resident #205 also received extensive assistance for toileting and had a Foley catheter. During observation on 7/9/19 at 11:45 AM and 7/11/19 at 9:30 AM it was confirmed that a Foley catheter leg bag was under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that medications were available when needed to meet the needs of each resident. Specifically, two doses of Kayexalate, a medicine used to lower high serum potassium levels, was not given to a resident for eleven hours after it was first ordered by the physician which put the resident at risk for complications associated with hyperkalemia and caused the resident to be transferred to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. The findings are: Resident #179 is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses of sickle cell crisis, diabetes, unstable angina, a heart condition. On 7/11/2019, labs were performed on Resident #179 which showed that her potassium level was elevated at 7.5 mg/dl; normal range is 3.5 mg/dl-5.5 mg/dl. The physician was contacted and prescribed Kayexalate to be administered immediately. The medication administration record (MAR) was reviewed and it was noted that on 7/11/2019 the 12-midnight dose contained an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, during the recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the results from diagnostic monitoring for a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication were available for review by the primary care physician (PCP). Specifically, electrocardiogram (EKG or ECG) monitoring every 2 weeks was ordered, initiated on 1/29/19. The EKG results were not available for review until surveyor intervention. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #66). The findings are: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Current diagnoses included Hypertension, Ischemic Heart Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Depression, Dementia and Psychosis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], a tool to assess a resident's care needs, was reviewed. The section for Behavior had no documented behaviors that were had been assessed. The Brief Interview for Mental Status indicated the resident scored a 13 indicating good cognition. The MD orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review the facility did not ensure that medications were secured in a locked storage area. Specifically, prescription eye drops were found in resident's top drawer of night table during a medication pass. The findings are: During med pass 07/12/2019 09:11 with LPN #2, Dorzolamide 2% eye drops, Brimonidine .2% eye drops and Natural Tears eye drops were due to be administered to Resident #179. LPN #2 was observed to search the medication cart to no avail. LPN #2 then went to Room # 335 where the resident was sitting on the bed and asked her if the eye drops were in the bedside table drawer to which the resident replied yes. The resident then opened the top bedside table drawer and produced the all 3 bottles of eyedrops in a plastic bag. The prescription eye drops in the plastic bag were verified and the resident's name and prescription were on the drops. On record review, there was no physician order indicating the resident was permitted to self-administer the eye drops or have the drops in her possession. Also, there was no care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-07-17 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the most recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each time a resident was transferred to a hospital, the resident's representative was notified of the transfer in writing. This was evident for 3 of 3 residents (Residents # 123, #165 and #167 reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include but not limited to the following: 1. Resident #123 was hospitalized on [DATE] for altered mental status to rule out sepsis and pneumonia. Nurses note documented that on 5/13/19 the resident looked weak and very confused. The family was contacted on 5/13/19 and requested that the resident be sent to the hospital. There was no documented evidence in the resident's record that the family was notified in writing of the reason for the transfer. 2. A Discharge note for Resident #165 dated 5/4/19 revealed that the resident was observed lying in bed, was disoriented and unable to follow simple instructions. The resident was transferred via 911 to a local…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JONATHAN BLEIER — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BAIN, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL8%since 05/01/2013
BLEIER, JONATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER92%since 10/09/2014
CAPITAL FUNDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 05/01/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$35.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.6M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 9%Other / private 25%

This home reported $5.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$406per resident / day
operating cost
$12,356per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$428per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335459. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next