No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Winkler Court

3250 Winkler Avenue Extension, Fort Myers, FL 33916 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (239) 939-4993 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$178,937 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $178,937 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-16)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3511 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd · (239) 343-4910 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3510 Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd · (239) 488-2580 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3449 Canal St · (239) 745-9808 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3901 Canal St · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.2%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.4%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.9%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.4%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.6%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.332.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.461.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 251 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.76U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.0%CMS range 51.2–64.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.8%CMS range 6.8–11.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 5.1–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
18.6%
Total nursing turnover
27.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.0 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-24)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, review of policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect by failing to ensure full body mechanical lifts were in safe operating condition, failing to ensure staff followed safety protocol when using mechanical lifts, and failure to ensure staff responsible for the inspection and maintenance of mechanical lifts was knowledgeable and competent to perform the job duties. Resident #1 was dependent on staff and required the use of a mechanical lift for transfer. On 1/22/24 Resident #1 fell from the full body mechanical lift during transfer. The motor of the lift used to transfer Resident #1 had been removed since July 2023, preventing the legs of the base to remain locked into position during the transfer. Resident #1 sustained cuts to the left arm, complained of pain and head trauma requiring an emergent transfer to an acute care hospital for evaluation and treatment. The facility's failure to ensure necessary structure and processes to prevent neglect placed other residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to prevent accidents by failing to ensure staff followed manufacturer's safety recommendations during transfer with mechanical lift, and failing to ensure mechanical lifts were in safe operating condition. On 1/22/24 staff used a full body mechanical lift to transfer Resident #1. The motor of the lift had been removed making the locking mechanism inoperable. Resident #1 fell from the lift, sustained cuts to the left arm, complained of head trauma and pain all over. Resident #1 required an emergent transfer to an acute care hospital for evaluation and treatment. The failure of staff to follow manufacturer's safety recommendations for transfer with mechanical lifts created an unsafe environment of avoidable accidents or falls which has a likelihood to result in serious injury (i.e. Fractures, head injuries), impairment, or death of residents from avoidable accidents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-02-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure resident equipment was in safe operating condition. On 1/22/24 Staff used a full body mechanical lift to transfer Resident #1. Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift, sustained cuts, complained of head trauma and generalized pain requiring an emergent transfer to an acute care hospital. The motor of the lift had been removed since July 2023 causing the legs of the base to not lock to ensure a safe transfer. Staff responsible for the inspection and maintenance of the mechanical lifts did not have the training and competency to ensure the mechanical lifts were in safe operating condition. The facility failure to implement processes and ensure resident care equipment were in safe operating condition created an unsafe environment of avoidable falls and accidents with a likelihood of serious harm, impairment or death of residents who use a mechanical lift for transfers and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). On 2/15/24 at 6:58 p.m., the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility's Administration failed to utilize resources effectively to protect the residents right to be free from neglect by failing to ensure staff competency in the areas of inspecting, identifying, and removing unsafe resident equipment from use, and safe transfer techniques with mechanical lifts. On 1/22/24 Staff used a full body mechanical lift to transfer Resident #1. The motor of the lift had been removed since July 2023 causing the legs of the base to not lock to ensure a safe transfer. Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift, sustained cuts, complained of head trauma and generalized pain requiring an emergent transfer to an acute care hospital. The facility's administration failure to ensure effective use of resources to ensure residents safety and prevent neglect created a likelihood of avoidable falls and accidents from mechanical lifts with a likelihood of serious injury, impairment or death of residents and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy. On 2/15/24 at 6:58 p.m., the facility's Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed was free from neglect when staff did not recognize, act upon, and report a critical change in condition in a timely manner. This failure resulted in a significant delay in emergency medical intervention for a resident experiencing severe hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis, and suspected diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The findings included:The facility Lab/Radiology Process Guidelines states STAT (immediate) and critical labs must be called into the physician as soon as they have resulted, with the nurse documenting the communication and follow-up in the electronic medical record.Record review for Resident #1 showed she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes. Review of Resident #1's admission notes on 4/9/26 said The patient was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with symptoms consistent with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (a life-threatening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident representative and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all refunds due the resident representative were refunded within 30 days of discharge for 1(Resident #1) of 1 resident as required.The findings included:Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Refunds with a revised date of [DATE] revealed, Refunds will be issued within the timeframe required by federal and or state law.Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and expired at the facility on [DATE].On [DATE] at 10:03 a.m., in a telephone interview Resident #1's spouse said the facility owed her a refund in the amount of $1546.00 and she has not received it yet. She said, They keep giving me excuses.On [DATE] at 11:11 a.m., in an interview the Business Office Manager (BOM) said she has been in constant communication with Resident #1's spouse and a refund was issued. The BOM said Resident #1 was Medicaid pending. The resident representative was responsible to pay $1500.00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #12) of 3 sampled residents by leaving prescribed medications at the bedside without ensuring ingestion. This practice has the potential to result in medication errors, including missed doses, and incorrect administration.The findings included:Review of the facility provided policy and procedure titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines (2007) revealed, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with . good nursing principles and practices . Procedures: . 4. Medications are to be administered at the time they are prepared. 5. The person who prepares the dose for administration is the person who administers the dose. 20. The resident is always observed after administration to ensure that the dose was completely ingested .On 3/5/26 at 9:12 a.m., during an interview with Resident #12, a medication cup with seven pills was observed on the resident's bedside table. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment for residents, staff and the public. The findings included: During an observation of the memory care unit on 4/21/25 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. the following was observed: Cracked walls with exposed plaster above air conditioning units, walls and corners including Rooms 208, 205, 204, 201, 206, 203, dining room and main hallway. Missing/broken closet doors including rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Foam sprayed in the bottom corner of the window near the back exit door. Chair/Bed rail missing off wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Broken window blinds including Rooma 204, 201, 207, 206, and 209. Peeling cove base in common hallway, dining room, and rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. The floors of the common hallway were cracked, stained and missing pieces. Tile was missing from the bathroom wall with exposed plaster in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Sink in Rom 208 was separated from the wall and wiggled when you touched it. On 4/21/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to treat 5 (Resident's #94, #26, #3, #220 and #221) of 5 residents observed with respect and dignity during in room meal tray administration. The findings included: On 4/21/25 at 9:01 a.m., during an observation of the morning in room tray service on the Ford Unit the following was noted: Resident #94 had a diagnosis of polyarthritis and dementia. She was observed drinking the milk from the carton. Resident's #26, #3 and #220 had no glass and the milk cartons were not opened. Resident #221 had no glass for the milk, the tray was sitting uncovered in front of him for 14 minutes with no assistance provided. Resident #221 was unresponsive to verbal stimuli. On 4/22/25 at 8:51 a.m., during an observation of morning meal tray pass noted residents who received milk did not receive glasses to serve the milk and had to drink from the carton. On 4/23/25 at 9:23 a.m., Resident #3 had no glass for her milk and the staff did not open the carton for her. Resident #3 said she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician signed the State of Florida Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order in a timely fashion for 3 residents (#39, #72, and #78) of 3 reviewed who chose a DNR status. Failure to have the physician sign the Florida DNR order. leaves the resident at risk of receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) against their wishes during transfer by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The findings included: A Florida DNR form is considered an advance directive. It's a specific type of advanced directive that instructs healthcare providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if the patient's heart or breathing stops. In Florida, a DNR order is a legal document, specifically DH Form 1896, directs medical professionals not to perform CPR on a person in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. The form must be on yellow paper and signed by both the resident (or their authorized representative) and the resident's physician. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) for 5 (Residents #111, #25, #27, #68, and #216) of 5 residents sampled for Infection control practices putting the residents at risk for transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). The findings included: Review of the facility's IPCP policy stated, The IPCP is a comprehensive program that addresses detection, prevention, and control of infections and communicable diseases among residents, visitors, volunteers, those individuals providing services under contractual agreement, and personnel. The IPCP, in addition, will facilitate activities to improve antibiotic use to reduce adverse events, prevent the emergence of antibiotic resistance, and promote better outcomes for residents. The goals of the IPCP are to: a. Provision of a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment b. Decrease the risk of infection and communicable diseases development and transmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to update/revise the comprehensive care plan related to pressure injuries for 1 Resident (#68) of 3 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. The findings included: Resident #68 was admitted on [DATE] with end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, feeding tube, colostomy tube, and indwelling urinary catheter. He was admitted to the facility with multiple pressure wounds. He had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 which indicateshe is cognitively impaired. Record review of the admission assessment did not reflect identification of a Stage 2 flank wound or a Stage 3 coccyx wound. Record review of the weekly skin assessments showed the following newly identified wounds. on 4/8/25, a Stage 2 pressure injury right rear flank, inferior and on 4/8/25, a Stage 3 pressure injury on the coccyx. On 4/21/25, the care plan did not reflect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive accurate assessments for 1 Resident (#68) of 3 residents reviewed. The findings included: Resident #68 was admitted on [DATE] with end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, feeding tube, colostomy tube, and indwelling urinary catheter. He was admitted to the facility with multiple pressure wounds. He was also cognitively impaired based on a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3. He attends dialysis at an outside facility. Record review showed an admission skin assessment, completed by Staff M, Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager, did not document the presence of a wound on the coccyx or on the right flank. Record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] did not assess a Stage 3 pressure injury or an unstageable pressure injury upon admission. There was no slough (yellow, stringy) or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and observations, the facility failed to complete a PASRR Level II referral for 1 (Resident #43) resident who demonstrated the return of a serious mental illness. This resulted in a lack of appropriate psychiatric assessment and increased risk of unmet care needs. The findings included: Review of the facilities PASRR Requirements Level 1 and Level 2, effective February 2021. The policy does not address a process for a PASRR assessment after the reemergence of a serious mental illness after the residents have been admitted to the facility. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another skilled nursing facility with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. A PASRR Level II determination completed on 6/6/2024 indicated that specialized services were not needed. On 1/29/2025, a psychiatric evaluation documented the resident's schizoaffective disorder was considered resolved. A Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was initiated, reducing Ziprasidone from 60 mg to 40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan reflective of the resident's choice of code status for 1 (Resident #78) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives care planning. The findings included: Review of Resident #78's record revealed a physician's order dated [DATE] for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status, meaning that if breathing or heart beats stop, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would not be initiated. Review of the nursing progress note by Registered Nurse (RN) Staff G dated [DATE], shows Resident #78 wanted a DNR code status. Review of Resident #78's care plan for advanced directives initiated [DATE], the resident requests Full Code status, meaning CPR would be initiated. On [DATE] at 10:00 a.m., during an interview Resident #78 said she told the facility she wanted a change to DNR status. On [DATE] at 5:36 p.m., during an interview RN Staff G she said she did not revise the care plan for advanced directives as the resident requested on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #54) of 1 residents reviewed for activities received services designed to meet their interests, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia and cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's care plan, initiated 2/25 and last revised 4/25, identified goals for Resident #54 to participate in activities of choice daily, with interventions including encouraging engagement with a general activities program and providing in-room activities if preferred. Observations across multiple days (4/21/25 at 8:15 a.m., 4/21/25 at 11:14 a.m., 4/21/25 at 3:00 p.m., 4/22/25 at 9:25 a.m., 4/22/25 at 10:39 a.m., 4/22/25 at 12:32 p.m., and 4/23/25 at 9:53 a.m.) demonstrated a lack of activities. Throughout these observations, no activity materials, music, television, or staff-led activities were present or offered to the resident. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified and the residents spouse was properly trained to administer medications for 1 (Resident #93) of 5 residents reviewed for medication observation. The findings included: The facility policy 7.1 Medication Administration General Guidelines documented Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. Medications are to be administered at the time they are prepared. The person who prepares the dose for administration is the person who administers the dose. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #93 was [AGE] year old with an admission date of 12/20/24. Diagnoses include protein calorie malnutrition, convulsions, muscle weakness and the need for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to assist in making an appointment with a practitioner specializing in the treatment of vision impairments and failed to ensure the resident's glasses were in good repair for 1 (Resident #50) of 1 resident reviewed for vision loss. The findings included: The facility policy Referral - Vision and Hearing Services documented The facility will assist residents in obtaining routine and prompt vision or hearing care period the social services department will work to assist and or coordinate services, such as but not limited to the following: 1. Appointments. 2. Prompt referrals (i.e , broken hearing aids glasses etcetera). 3. Identify those residents who require a prompt referral. Examples include but are not limited to: Damaged or broken hearing aids, glasses, or other assistive devices. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #50 was [AGE] years old and had an admission date of 9/6/21 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services and prevention of new ulcers from developing for 1 Resident (#68) of 3 residents reviewed. The findings included: Resident #68 was admitted on [DATE] with end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, feeding tube, colostomy tube, and indwelling urinary catheter. He was admitted to the facility with multiple pressure wounds. He was also cognitively impaired based on a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3. He attends dialysis at an outside facility. Record review of the admission History and Physical said that Resident #68 was high risk for skin breakdown and unavoidable wounds due to malnourishment. Record review showed an admission skin assessment, completed by Staff M, Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager, did not find a wound on the coccyx or on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to offer a therapeutic diet for 1 (Resident #60) of 2 reviewed for nutrition. The findings included: Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] with muscle wasting and atrophy, type 2 diabetes, anemia, heart failure, chronic ulcers, and kidney failure. He goes to the dialysis center 3 times per week. He scored a 15 on his Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) which indicates he is cognitively intact. On 4/21/25 at 4:08 p.m., Resident #60 was interviewed in his room after arriving from the dialysis center He stated, I'm waiting for dinner, they need to hurry I am starving. On 4/21/25 at 4:25 p.m., during an interview, Staff V, Registered Nurse (RN) said that he ate 100% of his breakfast and the facility provides him a lunch, she does not know why he is so hungry. Record review of the Dialysis Communication log dated 4/21/25 showed that at 8:30 a.m, Resident #60 ate breakfast at the facility, and he traveled to dialysis with a bagged lunch. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to care for residents needs for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 3 residents reviewed for medication orders. The findings included: Facility policy Physician Orders 4.3.1 effective October 2021 indicated on page 3: The nurse will review each hard chart for new orders and compare to the electronic order listing report to ensure each written order has been entered into the electronic medical record. If a written physicians order is found on the chart and not on the order listing, transcribe the order and notify the resident/representative. Medication/Treatment variance may be completed if needed with physician notification. Facility Policy titled Event Reporting effective 2019, change date March 2022 indicated: An event report will be completed by the nurse assigned to the resident, for any occurrence outside the routine operational expectation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors by not administering medications in accordance with prescribers' orders for 2 (Resident #1 and #2) of 3 residents reviewed for medication orders. The findings included: Facility policy Physician Orders 4.3.1 effective October 2021 indicated on page 3: The nurse will review each hard chart for new orders and compare to the electronic order listing report to ensure each written order has been entered into the electronic medical record. If a written physicians order is found on the chart and not on the order listing, transcribe the order and notify the resident/representative. Medication/Treatment variance may be completed if needed with physician notification. Facility Policy titled Event Reporting effective 2019, change date March 2022 indicated: An event report will be completed by the nurse assigned to the resident, for any occurrence outside the routine operational expectation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, records review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that staff were routinely monitored to ensure the safe use of mechanical lifts to transfer residents for 5 of 58 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (Staff A, Staff B, Staff C, Staff H, and Staff I), and 2 of 17 sampled Registered Nurses (RN) (Staff K and Assistant Director of Nursing) RNs. The findings included: The facility policy and procedure titled, Back Injury and Body Mechanics effective March 2022 noted, Mechanical Lifts for Residents . Complete Mechanical Lift competency (Appendix B) at orientation and annually . The facility's Skills Check for Total Lift included to identify the correct lift and inspect the lift for condition. The facility's policy and procedure titled, Lock Out/ Tag out Policy effective March 2022 noted, The facility will use the Lock Out/ Tag Out practices to secure inoperable equipment . Other Physical Equipment . Mechanical lifts . When an issue is identified, remove the equipment from use . On 2/12/24, review of the facility's accident investigations revealed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to effect 105 residents who resided in the facility. Review of Food and Nutrition Services Manual - Topic: Storage (Effective January 2021. Refrigerator storage: 1. store perishable foods in refrigerator and/or foods marked keep refrigerated: by the manufacturer 7. Discard leftovers per use by date. 8. Discard refrigerated leftovers after 72 hours. Maintain food temperature at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or less Review of policy and procedure for Dish Machine Temperature Log. Policy: To monitor dish machine temperatures and chemical saturation for both high and low temperature machines at each meal prior to dishwashing to assure proper cleaning and sanitizing of dishes Procedure: 2. Send an empty dish rack through the dish machine prior to recording temperatures. On 10/31/22 at 7:16 a.m., during a kitchen observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and policy review the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and system to monitor antibiotic use. The findings included: Reviewed policy and procedure titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, Tracking, Monitoring Antibiotic Prescribing, Use and Resistance, effective April 2017 which stated, Residents will have a complete clinical assessment documentation at the time of the antibiotic prescription. Audits of antibiotic prescriptions for completeness of documentation, regardless of whether the antibiotic was initiated in the facility or a transferring facility. Monthly prevalence studies regarding antibiotic usage will be presented to quality assurance and performance improvement committee (QAPI). This information can also be in the infection prevention and control monthly summary manuals. Reviewed policy and procedure, titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, effective October 2021 which stated, The Infection Prevention and Control Program is comprehensive program that addresses detection,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary repairs to maintain the building in a safe and comfortable environment for residents and visitors. The findings included: On 10/31/22 at 7:30 a.m., during initial tour of the Memory Care Unit, the following observations were made: A pungent smell of urine and other odors was noted immediately upon entering the unit. Bathroom trash cans were full of garbage and overflowing onto the floor in several bathrooms. room [ROOM NUMBER] there was an uncovered toothbrush resting on the bottom of the hand soap dispenser in a shared bathroom. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken nightstand with the top drawer missing for bed A. The blinds in the room were broken, missing sections and in disrepair. There were air-conditioning parts on the floor in the corner of the room. On 10/31/22 at 9:45 a.m., observed in the Memory Care Unit dining room were small flying insects flying over the food as the residents were eating. The flying pests were landing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a process was in place to assess parameters of nutritional status by not monitoring resident's weights on admission and thereafter for 6 ( Residents #91, #94, #96, #253, #351, and #402) admitted in past 30 days of 6 residents reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents residing in the facility. The findings include, Review of facility policy and procedure (Effective October 2021) - Topic: Weight management - states, weights are completed on admission and re-admissions, then weekly for 4 weeks and then monthly unless physicians' orders more frequently. On 11/1/22 during initial review of admission weights of sample residents, weights were not found for Residents #91, #94, #96, #253, #351, and #402 admitted in past 30 days. On 11/1/22 at 2:47 p.m., in an interview, the RN MDS Coordinator stated, We don't get the weight upon admission. I use the hospital weight as the admission weight. The MDS coordinator said the Restorative Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) used to do the weights but as of March, we…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of policy and procedure, review of the Center for Disease Control and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff followed infection prevention measures to prevent the spread of disease-causing organism when caring for 3 (Resident #3, #31, and #351) of 3 sampled residents reviewed on contact precaution. The findings included: The facility's policy and procedure, titled Clostridium-difficile: Prevent Spread, effective October 2021 stated, Residents diagnosed with Clostridium-difficile whose stool is not contained shall be placed on Contact Precautions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Page last reviewed July 12, 2021) notes C. diff. is a germ that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon. C. diff. can be life-threatening. The steps to prevent spread include to wear gloves and a gown when treating patients with C. diff., even during short visits. Gloves are important because hand sanitizer doesn't kill C. diff. and hand washing might not be sufficient alone to eliminate all C. diff. spores.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a dignified manner by dressing a resident in a hospital gown instead of regular clothes which resulted in feelings of embarrassment for 1(Resident #91) of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings included: On 10/31/22 at 11:02 a.m., record review revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pleural effusion, diabetes, assistance with personal care, and chronic kidney disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of 1 staff member for dressing and personal hygiene. On 10/31/22 at 9:30 a.m., 11/01 at 9:01 a.m. and 11:58 a.m. and 11/2/22 at 10:01 a.m., observations were made of Resident #91. The resident was observed in his room dressed in a hospital gown. On 10/31/22 at 11:58 a.m., Resident #91 said staff had not offered to get him dressed in regular clothes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident interviews, the facility failed to document, investigate and communicate resolution of a grievance voiced by the spouse of 1(Resident #91) of 4 residents reviewed for grievances. The findings included: Review of the facility's Grievance/Concern Management Policy and Procedure (Effective February 2021) indicated: Social Services #5. will monitor and document resident/family satisfaction upon completion of the investigation and the summary of the findings/conclusion #12. Complete a concern report investigation with summary and conclusion On 10/31/22 at 11:02 a.m., record review revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pleural effusion, diabetes, assistance with personal care, and chronic kidney disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required total dependence of 2 staff members toileting. On 10/31/22 at 11:58 a.m., Resident #91 said he had been left in feces and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #7, and #49) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings included: The facility policy 5.5.1 ADL: Assistance, effective July 2022, documented Each resident will be encouraged to be as independent as possible with activities of daily living (ADL's). Staff will provide assistance with ADLs per plan of care. 1. A review of Resident #7's clinical record showed a significant change minimum data set (MDS) (a tool used to gather resident information) with assessment reference date (ARD) 7/28/22. The MDS documented Resident #7 required limited assistance of 1 for dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment showed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The care plan documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement meaningful activity programs for 2 (Resident #48 and #302) of 2 residents reviewed with dementia on the secured Memory Care Unit. A lack of structured activities has the potential to cause boredom, agitation, and anxiety. The findings included: The facility policy 6.1.1, Dementia Related Programs, documented, Specialized support, maintenance, and empowerment activity programs are provided for residents with cognitive impairments. The activities are based on the level of dementia and functional ability.Review interdisciplinary data. Interview resident or representative to determine which activities interest the resident. Provide specialized activities based on the resident population with dementia and the various functional abilities of the residents. The activity calendar must include activities appropriate for dementia residents. 1. A review of Resident #48's clinical record showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to prevent falls for 1 resident (Resident #57) of four surveyed for falls. The findings included: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of displaced fracture of the right tibia. The resident has a history of chronic kidney disease, anemia and arrhythmia. The Minimum Data Set assessment completed on 9/11/22 shows the resident had a brief mental interview score of 12 indicating mild cognitive loss. On 8/31/26 at 2:26 p.m., Resident #57 said a staff member had rolled her out of the bed when she was changing her sheets. Resident #57 stated she had hit her head and she was still having headaches due to the fall. Review of the fall investigation completed on 10/18/22 shows Registered Nurse Staff V documented, Observed Resident lying on the floor on her left side Resident states she was turned to be changed and she rolled too far off the bed and fell to the floor. Resident stated she hit her head. On 10/18/22 Certified Nursing Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure competency and performance reviews are completed every 12 months for 2 (Staff B and Staff BB) of 6 staff sampled for performance review and competencies. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff B's permanent date of hire was listed on the facility rooster as 7/10/12. Review of the competency review record provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Staff B's last competency/performance review was completed on 5/12/21. On 11/2/22 at approximately 3:30 p.m., the DON verified Staff B's competency/performance review had not been completed within the last 12 months. 2. Record review revealed CNA Staff BB's permanent date of hire was listed on the facility rooster as 2/23/10. Review of the facility provided documentation revealed Staff BB had not had a competency/performance review completed since 2/16/18. On 11/2/22 at approximately 3:30 p.m., the DON verified Staff BB had not had a competency/performance review completed within the last 12 months.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure medications in a locked storage area consistent with state or federal requirements and professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #6 and #65) of 2 residents reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: Review of facility policy 7.1 Medication Administration General Guidelines policy dated 9/18 noted: Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. 7.1 (#3) notes that medication rooms, cabinets, and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access Section 7.1 (#15) notes residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the prescriber, the nurse care centers interdisciplinary team (IDT), and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications and state regulations. 1. On 10/31/2022 at 10:27 a.m., during a tour of the facility, one bottle of family care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to accommodate residents with food allergies/intolerances for 1 (Resident #65) of 1 resident reviewed. The findings included: On 10/31/22 at 12:18 p.m., during a tour of the facility Resident #65 was observed eating lunch. Resident #65 said she needs a gluten free diet but was given soggy toast and pasta for lunch. Resident #65 said she has reported this issue to multiple staff and during several care conferences. The dietary admission note dated 3/15/22 noted Resident #65 had a food allergy/intolerance to gluten. On 11/2/22 at 8:13 a.m., Resident #65 was observed in her wheelchair trying to eat breakfast in the dark. The blinds were closed, and lights were off. Resident #65 stated she can't eat most of what was sent for breakfast: white toast, potatoes, scrambled eggs. The meal ticket did not list toast, or scrambled eggs but baked omelet with cheese. Resident #65 stated Last night I sent my tray back, everything was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policies, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program and failed to provide a sanitary environment free from pests. The findings included: The facility policy 8.33.1 Pest Control documented, The facility strives to promote good sanitation practices to protect its residents and employees. The maintenance staff shall make every effort to inspect, identify, monitor, evaluate and control pests as their method of entry into the building. On 10/31/22 at 9:45 a.m., observation in the Memory Care Unit dining room revealed small flying insects flying over the food as the residents were eating. During random observations over 4 days on all units of the facility and in the conference room, small flying pests were noted daily. On 11/2/22 at 1:20 p.m., while in the office of the Director of Nursing, small flying pests were observed. The Care Plan Coordinator was in the office and began to swat at the insects with her hand and confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of policies and procedures, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement meaningful and empowerment activity programs to meet the assessed needs of 8 (Resident #5, #19, #39, #41, #58, #60, #62, and #64) of 8 residents identified with emotional and psychological needs. The lack of an individualized activity program has the potential to cause social isolation, boredom, agitation, and frustration. The findings included: The facility policy 6.1.1, Dementia Related Programs (1/2021) documented: Specialized support, maintenance and empowerment activity programs are provided for residents with cognitive impairments. The activities are based on the level of dementia and functional ability .Dementia related programming should be activities that can be broken down into small segments. The activity calendar must include activities appropriate for dementia residents. The facility policy 1.1.1 Activities Overview documented: Activities department employees will provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to have documentation of description of grievances, investigation and prompt interventions for 4 (Resident #19, #34, #64 and #202) of 4 residents who voiced grievances. The findings included: The policy for Grievance and concern management (August 2017) read, Residents/representative has the right to present concerns on behalf of themselves, and/or others to the staff and/or administrator of the facility . or to any other person. The concern may be filed verbally or in writing, and the reporter may request to remain anonymous. The NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) is responsible for oversight of the concern process . The social Services Representatives/Grievance official in collaboration with the NHA will be responsible for assigning the concern to the appropriate department for investigation. Social Services will monitor and document resident/family satisfaction upon completion of the investigation and the summary of findings/conclusion.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility's abuse and neglect policy, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure and document thorough investigation of resident complaints of staff treatment for 4 (Resident #19, #34, #64, and #202) of 4 residents with documented grievances reported to management. The findings included: The facility's policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention Program, From Risk Management Manual last updated 1/2020, specified: The facility has designated and implemented processes, which strive to reduce the risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident's property. These policies guide the identification, management, and reporting of suspected, or alleged, abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and exploitation. It is expected that these policies will assist the facility with reducing the risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident's property through education of staff and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy, in accordance with physician orders, for 2 (Residents #24 and #60) of 2 residents sampled for oxygen administration. Failure to follow prescribed oxygen therapy may result in inadequate oxygen treatment or an increased risk of side effects and complications. Findings included: Requested and received a copy of Oxygen Therapy Policy and Procedure. Received document titled: The Oxygen Therapy. (SMS O2 ED 2013). States: Definition of Oxygen 1) Oxygen is a drug which must be ordered by physician. Clinical Consideration: Clinical Consideration: 1) CO2 retainers- Some patients are sensitive to O2 and have the potential to stop breathing if their blood oxygen becomes elevated. These patients should be maintained with their O 2 saturations near 90% and monitor closely for sensorium change. 1. Observation on 4/5/21 at 12:05 a.m., found Resident #24 in bed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator set on 3 liters per minute (LPM). Resident #24 was observed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedures, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure timely access to locked emergency-controlled substance medications located in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms. The facility also failed to have a system to audit and reconcile the disposition of discharged controlled substances and failed to ensure secured and locked medication carts for 1 of 6 carts at the facility. The findings included: Facility policy and procedure 4.2 Controlled Medication Storage dated 2007 item 6 states At each shift change or when keys surrendered, a physical inventory of all Schedule II, including refrigerated items, is conducted by two licensed nurses per state regulation and is documented on the controlled substance accountability record or verifications of controlled substances count report. The nursing care center may elect to count all controlled medications at shift change. 1. On 4/6/21 at 4:27 p.m., during an observation of the medication room Ford Hall with Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-11-03 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post hours for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff on a daily basis as required by regulation. The findings included: Review of the facility postings from 10/10/22 to 10/31/22 revealed: There was no documentation of any licensed and unlicensed nursing staff hours posted on 10/11/22. There was no documentation of any licensed and unlicensed nursing staff hours posted on the 3 to 11 shift on 10/14/22. There was no documentation of any licensed and unlicensed nursing staff hours posted on the 7 to 3 and the 3 to 11 shift on 10/15/22. There was no documentation of any licensed and unlicensed nursing staff hours posted on the 7 to 3 and the 3 to 11 shift on 10/16/22. There was no documentation of any licensed and unlicensed nursing staff hours posted on 10/19/22. There was no documentation of any licensed and unlicensed nursing staff hours posted on the 3 to 11 shift on 10/20/22. There was no documentation of any licensed and unlicensed nursing staff hours posted on the 3 to 11 and the 3 to 11 shift on 10/21/22. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$178,937 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $178,937 — penalty dated 2024-02-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG-TERM CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG TERM CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/23/2002
JAFFE, HOWARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
KATZ-HALL, KATHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
MULLARKEY, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
RICHMOND, PENNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
AEGIR HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2009
CONSULTING SUPPORT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2011
FACILITY SUPPORT COMPANY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2010
KANE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/06/2012
BOSWELL, SALLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/19/2021
CONZELMAN, TINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2022
SELECT REHABILITATION, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/19/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$159K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 19%Other / private 21%

This home reported $159K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$348per resident / day
operating cost
$10,582per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$348per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105882. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next