Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Of Tampa

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 174 beds and averages 163.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2023-12-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills-sets to perform the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments and individual plans of care related to dietary staff not properly implementing adequate kitchen hygiene, proper sanitation practices, proper food labeling and storage, and appropriate serving of meals affecting 158 out of 168 residents in the facility. The likelihood of serious injury and/or death to 158 residents as a result of the facility's failure to prepare, store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 12/13/23. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 12/14/23 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D. Findings included: On 11/28/23 starting at 9:30 a.m. a tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted which revealed: An observation was made of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchens observed, and three of three nutrition rooms observed, as evidenced by improper dish washing, unsanitary kitchen area, undated food, expired food, inappropriate food temperatures, unlabeled food, unsanitary preparation of food, food with evidence of bio-growth, and residents not being served according to their prescribed diet orders. This failure created a situation that resulted in the likelihood of serious injury and/or death to 158 residents and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 12/13/23. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 12/14/23 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D. Findings Included: On 11/28/23 starting at 9:30 a.m. a tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted which revealed: An observation was made of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2023-12-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to utilize the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to investigate, develop, and implement an effective Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen observed, and three of three nutrition rooms observed. The facility failed to ensure the safety of 158 residents in the facility as a result of the failure. The likelihood of serious injury and/or death to 158 residents as a result of the facility's failure to prepare, store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 12/13/23. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 12/14/23 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D. Findings included: During a survey on 11/28/23 to 11/29/23 and 12/11/23 to 12/14/23 the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent falls/accidents resulting in an injury to one resident (#1) out of three residents sampled for falls. Resident #1 sustained a scalp hematoma and clavicle fracture with a transfer to a higher level of care. Findings included: Review of the admission Record showed Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility in 2017 and discharged to a local hospital on [DATE]. The admission Record showed diagnoses to include: other sequelae following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, dementia, weakness, lack of coordination, and need for assistance with personal care. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 showing severe cognitive impairment. The resident had no mood or behaviors identified, and no falls since the prior MDS assessment dated [DATE]. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · H2023-12-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered and pain was managed for three residents (#20, #14, and #9) of four reviewed for pain management. Findings included: 1. An interview was conducted on 11/29/23 at 3:18 p.m. with Resident #14. The resident stated her pain level was an 8 out of 10 on the pain scale and was located in her shoulders and lower back. The resident was lying in bed with the head of her bed elevated. She winced (shrinking movement of the body in anticipation of pain or distress) with pain when she tried to reposition herself. The resident said she has Morphine scheduled every 6 hours as needed and she routinely takes it two to three times a day. Resident #14 said it had been a couple of days since the facility had any available. She said she asked her nurse for pain medication two times that day and had been told her pain medication had not been delivered to the facility. The resident said she is worried…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide social services supports for one resident (#6) of fourteen sampled residents.Findings included: On 04/20/2026 at 10:21 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident #6's family member. She stated (Resident #6) only received $30.00 per month.An interview conducted on 04/20/2026 at 1:40 p.m. with Resident #6. He was observed in bed. He stated he had no money coming to the facility.On 04/21/2026 at 2:26 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD). When asked if she had received any complaints regarding Resident #6, she stated she had not. The SSD stated for Resident #6, she was not sure whether a complaint had been received from the resident. She said she had not gone and spoke with him.On 04/21/2026 at 2:35 p.m., Resident #6 was re-interviewed. When asked about his income, he stated before he came to the facility, he was receiving $800.00 per month. He said, then the check from social security…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents on two of three floors (2nd and 3rd floors) had an environment free from heavy foul and offensive odors during four of four days observed (3/30/25, 3/31/25, 4/1/25, and 4/2/25). It was found heavy odors emitted from two of thirty-four sampled residents (#163 and #80) and their rooms. Findings included: On 3/30/2025 at 9:58 a.m., the elevator doors opened on the second floor and there was immediately a heavy foul urine and offensive odor. After walking past the unit station and to Resident #163's room, it was observed the room door was closed. After knocking on the door and opening it, a very heavy foul urine and offensive odor emitted from this room. The odor was overpowering and leached throughout out areas to include the activity/dining room, hall near the shower room, the nurse station and down both halls approximately thirty feet away from Resident #163's room. Upon entering Resident #163's room, she was observed lying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1. Call light cords and buttons were placed within reach while residents were in bed in five of ninety-six resident rooms, on two of three floors, (Rooms 214a, 216p, 234a, 302a 310a, and 310b, ; and 2. Did not ensure bathroom call light cords were free hanging and not tied to hand rails for resident bathrooms 220, 226, 228, 234, and 310, during three of four days observed (3/30/25, 3/31/25, 4/1/25). Findings included: During various tour observations on 3/30/2025 at 10:00 a.m., 1:30 p.m., 3:00 p.m.; 3/31/2025 at 9:30 a.m., 2:00 p.m.; and on 4/1/2025 at 10:30 a.m. the following was observed: 1. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]a was observed with the resident lying in bed and with the call light button and cord out from reach, lying on the floor back behind the head of the bed. 2. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]p was observed with the resident lying in bed and with the call light button and cord out from reach, lying on the floor back behind…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide two of thirty-four sampled residents, (#107, and #36) with a homelike eating experience during two of three meals observed on 3/30/2025 and 3/31/2025. Findings included: On 3/30/2025 at 12:15 p.m., the third floor dining/activity room was observed during lunch service. It was observed with one long table and with seven residents seated at it in either wheelchairs or regular chairs. Resident #107, who was seated in his wheelchair at the end of the table, was observed without his meal. All the other six residents seated at the table had been served, set up with their meals, and were eating. However, Resident #107 was observed just watching the others eat, and without a meal tray of his own. Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was the only staff member in the dining/activity room. She said she was assisting another resident with eating assistance and they had not got out Resident #107's meal yet. She said there were two other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented related to call light placement when residents were in bed for three (#163, #80, and #113) of thirty-four sampled residents. Finding included: 1. During observations on 3/30/2025 at 9:58 a.m., 3/31/2025 at 11:20 a.m., 12:25 p.m., 1:11 p.m., and on 4/1/2025 at 7:40 a.m., Resident #163 was seen in her room lying flat in bed and on top of the covers. She was noted looking up and at the wall with no affect. Resident #163 had cognitive impairment and was not able to answer questions related to her day, medical care and services. During each observed time, Resident #163 was found with the call light cord and button not on her bed, and not within reach. The call light was located on the floor back behind the head of the bed, and out of her reach. Photographic evidence obtained. On 4/1/2025 at 1:25 p.m., Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) confirmed the call light was on the floor and out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to physician orders for pain parameters and administration of pain medications for one (Resident #147), and nebulizer treatments for one (Resident #132) of 34 residents reviewed for physician orders. Findings included: 1. On 3/30/25 at 9:52 a.m. during an interview and observation, Resident #132 said at the end of his of a breathing treatment he removed the nebulizer mask because staff took a long time to return. In the top drawer of Resident #132's bedside table were three plastic unopen ampules. Resident #132 said the ampules contained medication for his breathing treatment. Resident #132 twisted the cap off of one ampule and poured the clear liquid contents in the top opening of the connection between the mask and the medicine cup part of the nebulizer mask. Review of Resident #132's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], section c, showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide suctioning for one (Resident #70) with a Tracheostomy out of 34 residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 03/30/2025 at 10:12 a.m., Resident #70 was observed sitting in bed dressed in a hospital gown and was observed to have a Tracheostomy with no suction. During an observation on 03/30/2025 at 12:15 p.m., the Risk Manager was observed bring a Suctioning machine onto the 3rd floor and putting into resident #70's room. During an observation on 03/30/2025 at 12:26 p.m., a suctioning machine was observed on the dresser in Resident #70's room. Review of Resident #70's admission record revealed a re-admission date of 03/29/2025 and initial admission date of 11/25/2024. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including Pneumonitis Due to Inhalation Of Food And Vomit, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Unspecified Whether With Hypoxia Or Hypercapnia, Encounter For Attention To Tracheostomy, Chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1) availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) for four out of five bins on hallway 4 Long, 2) proper storage of respiratory equipment for one (Resident #132) of two residents, and 3) proper Contact Precautions were followed for one (Resident #155) of two residents on transmission-based precautions. Findings included: 1. On 3/30/2025 at 9:01 a.m., an observation was made of the 4 Long hallways of four out of five PPE bins missing gowns and/or gloves. Bin Five was located at the end of 4 Long hallways close to 4 Short hallway and had two gowns observed in the bottom drawer. On 3/30/2024 at 9:24 a.m., an observation was made in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] with a Contact Isolation Precaution sign on the front door with no PPE in the bin on the outside of the immediate room entrance. An unidentified Certified Nurse Assistant went down to the 4 Long hallways where bin 5 was and pulled the remainder of the two gowns there, offered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a process was in place for smoking safety for three (#8, #29, #164) out of 19 residents sampled. Findings Included: 1. During an interview on 10/28/2024 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #8 was observed lying in bed dressed for the day. To the right of her bed was a bedside table with a green and white box of cigarettes. Next to the box was a lighter. Resident #8 stated she was a smoker but only smoked occasionally when she was having a bad day. She stated she usually signed out at the front desk and went in front of the building to smoke. She stated she did not use the facilities smoking section because the smoking area was disgusting and the times available were not convenient for her. She stated, no one cleans the smoking area, and it smells out there. She stated she bought cigarettes from the store in front of the building and two packs last her up to six months. She stated all of the other residents in the facility knew they could come…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a accurate comprehensive care plan for one (#141) of eight sampled residents. Findings included: On 10/29/24 at 9:15 AM observed Resident #141 was not in room. The housekeeper in the room emptying trash can stated he already left for dialysis, referencing Resident #141. Observed white cup half filled with clear liquid with straw in cup, marked with 10/29/24. Review of resident #141 medical record showed an initial admission to facility on 08/20/2024 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, and end stage renal disease. Review of physician orders revealed: - Enhanced Barrier Precautions: C-Auris, Dialysis Catheter and wounds. - Resident to have Dialysis on days: T TH S [name of dialysis center]. Catheter site: right subclavian, Bag meal/snack to go with resident to Dialysis yes or No:yes, Fluid Restriction yes or No:Yes. - 1200 cc Fluid Restriction- Dietary to give 900 cc nursing to give up to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$231,152 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,035 — penalty dated 2024-08-20
• $219,117 — penalty dated 2023-12-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG-TERM CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $231K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL