No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pompano Health And Rehabilitation Center

51 W Sample Road, Pompano Beach, FL 33064 · Non profit - Corporation · 127 certified beds · (954) 942-5530 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (954) 942-5530 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
50 E Sample Rd · (954) 942-3991 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
850 W Sample Rd · (954) 785-3250 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
519 E Sample Rd · (954) 366-5076 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3299 NE 3rd Ave · (954) 357-8109 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.9%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.7%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.3%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.5%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.1%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.7%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.572.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.301.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.6%CMS range 28.6–53.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.8–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified64.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.2–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
30.3%
Total nursing turnover
56.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 121.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-02)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address and resolve a resident representative's grievances related to transportation and billing for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum assistance with activities of daily living.A telephone interview was conducted with Resident #1's Power of Attorney (POA) on 01/13/26 at 12:00 PM. The POA stated she had expressed concerns to the facility related to Resident #1's transportation from the hospital and billing. The POA stated Resident #1 had a fall on 12/04/25, which the resident was sent out to the hospital via 911 for evaluation. Resident #1's POA was contacted by the hospital concerning the return of the resident back to the facility. The POA stated she contacted the facility and was told by the Unit Manager (UM) not to worry, they would handle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep food safety requirements in accordance with the professional standard of food service safety 2 visits to the main kitchen. The findings included: In a tour of the main kitchen conducted on 09/29/25 at 9:30 AM, the following issues were noted: a. The sanitation solution was checked in the 3-compartment sinks, which showed that the solution was between 400 and 500 parts per million. Using a facility's Hydrion strip, it was revealed that there was too much sanitizing solution and it was not within the normal ranges of sanitizers, which typically fall between 100 and 400, with a recommended range closer to 200. b. The reach in the freezer was noted with four containers of ice cream cups that were melted and partially opened. c. The back of the reach-in freezer was noted with debris, plastic containers, and napkins. d. Insects were noted in all stages of life, on the walls and the floor of the main kitchen. In this observation, the Kitchen Manager stated that she was not aware of any insects in the kitchen and that no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for advance directives for 5 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #10, Resident #27, Resident #60, Resident #72 and Resident #99; and failed to initiate care plans for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for catheter, Resident #126.The findings included:1. Record review showed Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease and vascular dementia, severe with anxiety. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of the Physician's Orders showed Resident #10 had an order dated 02/03/25 for DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). A review of the Care Plan dated 08/25/25 documented that Resident #10 had a terminal diagnosis. The Goals were to support with management of signs and symptoms of depression and/or anxiety by the next review date. The interventions included honoring advanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 of 27 sampled residents, (Resident #44, Resident #90, and Resident #104), whose call lights were not within their reach. The findings included: Review of the provided Policy and Procedure titled, Physical Environment, included #5: Assure an applicable working system is in place and within reach for the resident to summon assistance, including, but not limited to a typical call light with cord. The findings included:1. Record review revealed Resident #44 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Cerebral Infarction, Weakness, Lack of Coordination, and Dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], section C, documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, on a scale of 0 to 15, indicating severe cognitively impaired. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to support the choices, activities, and schedules for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for choices, Resident #8.The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #8 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Heart Failure and Diabetes. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], section C for Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), showed a score of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 09/29/25 at 11:46 AM, Resident #8 stated that about a month ago, he noticed the television (TV) screen on his side was shattered and was on top of the nightstand, which was not his TV. He reported the findings to staff, who all denied breaking it, and was told that he would need to buy one on his own to replace the broken TV. The Quarterly Activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #8's activity of choice was watching TV. The Activity Care Plan dated 07/23/25 revealed that Resident #8 will be encouraged to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and failed to ensure that fall interventions were followed for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for accidents, Resident #90. The findings included:Review of the Fall and Injury Reduction Policy effective March 2023 stated that the facility had designated and implemented processes, which strove to reduce the risk for falls and injuries. The policy guided the identification and implementation of appropriate interventions. One of the specifications included implementation of a plan of care based on individual resident needs. Record review revealed Resident #90 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Repeated Falls, and Dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], section C, documented Resident #90 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding orders were followed as per the physicians' orders and failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #5). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Management, dated January 2021, showed the following: the Dietitian will document assessment of weight change and intervention. The Dietitian will identify significant weight changes with the following: 1 week 2%, 1 month 5%, 3 months 7.5% and 6 months 10%. Record review revealed Resident #5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease, Moderate Calorie and Protein Malnutrition, and Type 2 Diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Section C, showed Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #5's weight log showed the following:On 09/05/25, the weight was 124.8 pounds. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in a manner consistent with physician orders for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #85 and #46) reviewed for respiratory and failed to assure resident care policies and procedures for respiratory care and services are developed affecting 1 of 3 tracheostomy residents (Resident #85.)The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility 04/08/25 with diagnoses of Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage (a type of bleeding near your brain that can happen after a head injury); acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and anoxic brain damage. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #85 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS indicated Resident #85 received treatments such as tracheostomy care, oxygen therapy, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain dialysis communication sheets for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #117). The findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis Management, dated October 2021, revealed the following: The facility will coordinate care and services for hemodialysis residents. Complete the Dialysis Communication Tool before and after dialysis and follow up on any special instructions from the dialysis center. A record review revealed Resident #117 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease and was dependent on dialysis. A review of the physician's orders showed an order for the Resident to undergo dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays, dated 09/26/25.The Nutrition Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the following: Resident #117 has a hyponatremic (low blood sodium) diagnosis and fluid fluctuations that are anticipated secondary to dialysis. Resident #117's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify triggers and implement care plans with triggers for residents with PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorders) for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #3.The fundings included:Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included of the Psychosocial History and Assessment for Resident #3 dated 07/16/25 documented the following, resident has been diagnosed with PTSD. Is there a smell, sound, touch, taste, sight or other sensation that causes a flashback or trigger was answered yes. If yes, what causes flashbacks or triggers was answered being in situations where he feels anxiety. When asked what happens when the resident experiences a trigger was answered Increased anxiety. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognitive response. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #3 dated 07/14/25 documented with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate medication for 1 of 6 residents, Resident #39, reviewed for medication reconciliation.The findings included:On [DATE] at 11:50 AM, a review of the North medication care was conducted with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #39. Record review reveled Resident #39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, and Dementia Review of the physician's order, dated [DATE], documented Alprazolam Oral Tablet 0.25 MG (Alprazolam), a *Controlled Drug,*Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for Anxiety/Agitation for 14 Days and was discontinued on [DATE]. Review of the Controlled Drug Declining Inventory Sheet for Resident #39 for the Alprazolam .25mg tablet documented the medication was signed out on [DATE] at 8:24 PM. Review of medication administration record from 0701/25 to [DATE] revealed no documentation of Alprazolam 0.25mg being administered. Review of the nurse progress notes from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication were secured, for 1 of 27 sampled residents, Residents #99, reviewed for medications. The findings included:Record review for Resident #99 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Cerebral Infarction Due to Embolism of Left Middle Cerebral Artery, Other Lack of Coordination, and Aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status could not be conducted due to the resident is rarely/never understood. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #99 revealed no order for ointments or gels to be applied topically. Record review revealed no assessment for self-administration of medication(s). On 09/29/25 at 10:39 AM, an observation was made of 2 over the counter medications (Ultra Strength Muscle Rub with active ingredients: Camphor 4%, Menthol 10% and Methyl Salicylate 30% and triple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed ensure they implemented an effective infection control program, as evidenced by failure to follow enhanced barrier precautions guidelines for 1 of 42 residents on enhanced barrier precautions, Resident #25.The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Barrier Precautions dated August 2025, included the following: During high-contact resident care activities: dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting for Residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is required. PPE consists of wearing gloves and gown prior to the high contact care activity.Post clear signage on the door or wall outside of the resident room indicating the type of Precautions and required PPE. For Enhanced Barrier Precautions, signage should also clearly indicate the high-contact resident care activities that require the use of gowns and gloves.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for 2 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #60 and Resident #126.The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #126 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Muscle Wasting and Atrophy and Pneumonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 indicating a cognitive response. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #126 revealed an order dated 10/02/25 for Inactivated Influenza Quadrivalent Vaccine 0.5 ML (Inactivated Influenza Quadrivalent Vaccine) Inject 0.5 ml intramuscularly one time only for Immunization for 1 Day Please employ the appropriate VIS for Flu vaccines. Please obtain consents for vaccines as well as enter information under the immunization tab. Review of the Vaccine Consent Form with no date for Resident #126 revealed it was signed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for a special study was scheduled and completed in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled resident reviewed, Resident #1.The findings included: Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase, Traumatic Hemorrhage of Cerebrum and Gastrostomy Status. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 indicating severe cognition impairment and that the resident had a feeding tube. The resident's care plan titled Tube Feeding documented, The resident is receiving enteral nutrition r/t (related to) gastrostomy status and Dysphagia initiated on 05/10/25 with interventions to include obtain and review lab (laboratories) / diagnostic work as ordered, report results to MD [physician] and follow up as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain the residents' medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 3 sampled resident reviewed, Resident #1. The findings included: Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Traumatic Hemorrhage of Cerebrum, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, Unspecified. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 indicating severe cognition impairment. Review of Resident #1's clinical record documented a physician order dated 08/06/25 for remove foley catheter.Review of Resident #1's clinical record August 2025 Treatment administration Record (TAR) documented a foley catheter was removed on 08/07/25. On 08/28/25 at 9:21 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it obtained a current physician order for an Intravenous (IV) dressing and IV site; and failed to change the Intravenous (IV) dressing to the right upper chest for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed, Resident #4. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Dressing Change for Vascular Access Devices, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), reviewed 2011, documented in the Policy Statement Purpose: To prevent local and systemic infection related to the IV catheter. Policy: A sterile dressing is maintained on all peripheral and central vascular access devices to protect the site, provide a microbial barrier, and to provide vascular access device securement .3. Central venous access device and peripheral midline dressings are changed every 7 days and immediately if the integrity of the dressing is compromised, if moisture, drainage or blood is present, or for further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 3 wings in the facility, [NAME] wing. The findings included: On 05/28/24 at 9:53 AM, an observation was made in Resident #67's room of an offensive urine-like odor noted in the resident's room. On 05/28/24, a side-by-side observation of Resident #67's room bathroom was conducted with the Housekeeping Manager and District Housekeeping Manager. They both acknowledged the offensive odor. The Housekeeping Manager stated that the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) inform them when the room has odors, they do use deodorizers, and clean the room as necessary. The District Housekeeping Manager stated they were aware of other rooms which are in their focus cleaning list and will add Resident #67's room to the list. On 05/30/24 at 1:00 PM, an observation was made of an overwhelming smell of urine in the hallway between rooms 60 to 62. An interview was on 05/28/24, at 9:55 AM with Staff E, CNA,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly document and thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for skin discoloration, Resident #120. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated August 2022, included, in part, the following: These policies guide the identification, management and reporting of suspected, or alleged, abuse, neglect, mistreatment and exploitation. Injury of Unknown source: An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when all of the following criteria are met: No person observed the source of the injury. The resident could not explain the source of the injury. The injury is suspicious because of its extent or location. Procedure: The facility has implemented the following processes: The Administrator is responsible for designating an Abuse Coordinator. The designed shift supervisor is identified as responsible for immediate initiation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a comprehensive care plan for psychotropic medications with measurable objectives and interventions for 2 of 25 sampled residents, Resident #40 and Resident #63. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Care Plan - Interdisciplinary Plan of Care from Interim to Meeting, dated February 2024, included, in part, the following: The facility shall support that 'each resident must receive, and the facility must provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care'. The facility shall assess and address care issues that are relevant to individual residents, to include, but may not be limited to, monitoring resident condition, and responding with appropriate interventions. 1, Record review for Resident #40 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive wound care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for wound care, Resident #48. The findings included: Review of the facility's document provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), titled, Clean Dressing Change Competency Checklist, documented, in part, .wash hands and apply gloves .remove dressing and discard, remove gloves, wash hands, apply gloves .clean wound using circular motion starting from the center toward the outside (clean to dirty) .remove gloves, wash hands, don gloves and apply treatment as ordered . Review of Resident #48's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Cachexia, Adult Failure to Thrive, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region and Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of Resident #48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper indwelling (foley) catheter care consistent with accepted standards of practice; failed to insert the appropriate catheter size and failed to date the urinary drainage bag as per physician order for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheter care review during foley care provided for Resident #48. The findings included: Record review for Resident #48 documented an admission on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Cachexia, Adult Failure to Thrive, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow), Chronic Kidney, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, and Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of Resident #48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 indicating the resident had severe cognition impairment. The resident's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #63. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Nutrition Assessment and Progress Note, dated January 2023, revealed, in part, the following: Initial nutrition assessment will be completed within 14 days of admission, and reassessment is completed quarterly, annually, and with significant change or readmission as needed. Record review showed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Dementia, Psychosis, and falls. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #63 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. In an observation conducted on 05/30/24 at 9:03 AM, Resident #63 received her breakfast tray. The tray was filled with crispy bacon, cereal, fortified oatmeal, juice, and coffee.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance medication reconciliations were accurate for 4 of 6 sampled residents reviewed during the controlled substance record review at the facility's west and south wings, for Residents #48, #82, #93 and #117; failed to obtain a physician's order for a psychotropic medication for Resident #93, reviewed for controlled substance use; failed to properly dispose of a controlled substance medication for Resident #117; failed to provide and document a scheduled medication as ordered for sampled Resident #83, as evidenced by it not being available; and failed to administer a scheduled medication to 1 of 3 residents observed for medicaiton administration, Resident #6. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, with no revision date, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented under documentation .the resident's MAR (Medication Administration Record)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor residents' behaviors for those residents receiving psychotropic medications for 4 of 25 sampled residents, Residents #63, #40, #99 and #113. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Behavior Monitoring Record, dated October 2021, included in part, the following: Procedure 1. Enter the following information into electronic medical record. 2. Describe the specific behavior to be monitored. 3. Code the interventions determined to address the specific behavior. 4. Enter the frequency of the behavior on each shift. 5. Enter the letter code (or # code) of the intervention(s) chosen to address the behavior. 6. Enter the outcome code of the intervention(s). 1. Record review for Resident #63 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Fracture of Unspecified Part of Neck of Left Femur, Unspecified Dementia Unspecified Severity with Other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to address physician ordered 'As Needed' (PRN) psychotropic medications that had 'no stop date' in a timely manner for 3 of 25 sampled residents, Residents #48, #82, and #99. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Use of Anti-Psychotic Medication, dated [DATE], included, in part, the following: To assess, monitor and manage a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication. PRN antipsychotic medications will be discontinued after the 14th day post the initial order. If the prescriber wishes to continue the medication: A face to face evaluation Documentation to include the reason the prn medication is required The benefit to the resident and ways in which the residents condition improved as a result of the prn This documentation must be in the medical record. 1. Record review for Resident #99 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Cerebrovascular Disease, Unspecified Dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medications and medication carts in a secure and sanitary manner for 2 of 3 medication carts observed during facility tours and medication administration opportunities; and failed to dispose of expired eyedrops as observed during medication storage tours. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Storage of Medication, dated 09/2018, included in part the following: Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer or provider pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe effective drug administration. The medication supply shall be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Procedures: 1. The provider pharmacy dispenses medications in containers that meet state and federal labeling requirements, including requirements of good manufacturing practices established by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their menus to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 2 observations completed in the main kitchen. This has the potential to affect 40 residents on a regular diet. The cnesus at the time of survey was 124 residents. The findings included: Review of the facility's menu cycle, week 2, 2024 diet menu, showed the following food items on the regular diet: 3 ounces of corn beef, ½ of braised cabbage, ½ cups of boiled new potatoes, dinner roll, and pudding parfait. In an observation conducted on 05/30/24 at 11:30 AM, Staff A, Cook, was observed plating a piece of corn beef on a regular diet plate during the lunch tray line. The surveyor proceeded to request the weight of the corned beef on the plate be taken. Continued observation showed the Food Service Manager (FSD) taking the weight of the corned beef using a facility's food scale. The corned beef measured 1 ounce, which was plated earlier by Staff A on the regular diet. Another piece of corn beef was taken and placed on the food scale,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food choices and preferences for 3 of 25 sampled residents during dining observations, Resident #28, Resident #64, and Resident #110. The findings included: 1. Record review showed that Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognition was intact. In an interview conducted on 05/28/24 at 10:10 AM with Resident #28, she stated that they often make mistakes on her meal trays and do not give her the correct food items she requested. In an observation conducted on 05/29/24 at 9:00 AM, Resident #28 was in her room with the breakfast tray. The meal ticket on the tray showed the following food items: Two individual hard-boiled eggs Home fried potatoes Bagel with cream cheese A fruit plate. The continued observation showed a breakfast plate with a bagel and cream cheese, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct fluid restriction for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis, Resident #58. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and dependence on dialysis. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order for 1200 milliliters (ml) of fluid restriction with a diet of 260 ml at breakfast, 240 ml at lunch, and 120 ml at dinner for a total of 720 ml a day, dated 01/18/24. Further review of orders revealed no water was to be left at the bedside, which was also dated 01/08/24. In an observation conducted on 05/29/24 at 12:58 PM, Resident #58 was in her room with her lunch tray that consisted of the following: 8 ounces of tea and 16 ounces of water noted in a white Styrofoam cup near the lunch tray. The meal ticket for Resident #58 stated the following: Renal diet, with fluid restriction of 720 ml a day and 8 ounces of tea for lunch. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 2 observations conducted in the central kitchen. The findings included: The first initial visit to the main kitchen was conducted on 05/28/24 at 7:25 AM. The following concerns were observed: 1. A round garbage can with an opened lid was noted in the food production area. 2. The floor around the food production area and behind the stove was noted with debris and dirt. 3. Another round garbage can with an opened circle created on top of the lid was noted in the food production area. 4. The reach-in refrigerator was noted with a large plastic container with a green lid that was not dated or labeled with the type of food inside. 5. The reach-in refrigerator had an internal thermometer located near the reach-in refrigerator indoors, which had an internal temperature of 51 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and not the recommended 40 degrees and below Fahrenheit for cold food items. 6. The reach-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare an approved menu in advance and follow an approved menu to ensure the residents' nutritional needs are met for 109 facility residents in the facility, that included potentially 30 of 30 sampled residents. The findings included: 1. During the observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 05/01/23 at 11 AM, the surveyor requested the approved menu for the lunch meal from the cook (Staff B). The cook replied there was not an approved menu for any of the 4-week menu cycle. The cook stated the entree for the lunch meal was Swedish Meatballs and the alternative entree was stuffed shells. The cook also stated the required entree protein serving portion of the meatballs was 3 ounces and Staff B did not know the protein portion of the Stuffed Shells. The surveyor requested the standardized recipe for the preparation of the Swedish Meatballs and Stuffed Shells. The cook stated the entrees were fully prepared frozen and required heating. The cook also stated that meatballs required a gravy to be prepared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that potentially affected 109 of the 113 facility residents and included 30 of 30 sampled residents. The findings included: 1. During the initial kitchen/sanitation tour conducted on 05/01/23 at 9:00 AM and accompanied with the Dietary Manager (DM), the following were noted: (a) A chemical test of cleaning cloth buckets noted 1 of 3 did not contain the required level of Quaternary chemical as per regulatory requirement (200 PPM). Photographic Evidence Obtained. (b) The internal cavity and internal door of the convection oven were covered with a black carbon substance and were not being cleaned on a regular basis. The DM stated the oven should have been cleaned over the last weekend. Photographic Evidence Obtained. (c) Observation of the walk-in refrigerator noted that 12 food storage shelves were heavily rust laden. It was discussed with the DM that the shelving was in need of replacement. Photographic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #36 & Resident #43, received the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) informing them of their rights to appeal termination of Medicare supported skilled services. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #36's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Dementia, Psychotic disturbance, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) section C revealed that Resident #36 was rarely understood, so the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be assessed. record review documented Resident #36's rehabilitation skilled services started on 03/02/23 and ended on 04/02/23. On 03/30/23, the facility issued the notice of Medicare non-coverage (NOMNC) that intended to inform the resident or representative that skilled services would be terminated. Further review of the document showed that the NOMNC was signed by the Social Service Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for activities that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the needs for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #103, reviewed for psychosocial needs. The findings included: Record review documented Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Nontraumatic Subdural Hemorrhage and Respiratory Failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), section C dated 03/31/23, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score could not be assessed, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 05/01/23 at 10:44 AM, Resident #103 was observed in bed with no personal sensory stimulation equipment in the room. On 05/02/23 at 11:42 AM, Resident #103 was observed in bed with no activities. There were no sensory stimulation in his personal space. Review of the comprehensive care plans dated 02/10/23 and updated 04/07/23 revealed there was no plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment to maintain, restore or improve the functional abilities of 2 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #45 and Resident #103, as evidenced by: no splint for Resident #103, and no weighted utensils and lip plate for Resident #45. The findings included: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], for Resident #103, under section G (functional Status) and G0110 for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Assistance documented the resident was totally dependent on staff for all ADLs. Review of the care plan dated 04/17/23 revealed: RANGE OF MOTION: The Resident has a risk or actual limitations in Range of Motion as evidenced by; Requires Splinting Application to left hand (resting hand splint). The Resident: Will have none to minimal pain, discomfort at acceptable level, Limitation will not interfere with daily functions. Will remain free of injuries or complications related to limitations of range of motion. Will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to provide fingernail care for 2 of 2 sampled residents observed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), related to lack of fingernail care for Resident #103, and Resident #315. The findings included: The facility Policy and Procedure, titled, ADL [Activities of Daily Living]: Assistance, effective date July 2022, had 3 steps. Step three listed the ADLs that staff may perform for or with the resident. Item d. listed Nail Care. 1. Record review documented Resident #315 was admitted on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment was completed 04/18/23 that documented Resident #315 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 of 15, indicating Resident #315 was cognitively intact. In Section G of the MDS, ADLs, under Item J, Personal Hygiene, Resident #315 was identified as needing extensive assistance with a one person assist. Review of the care plan for Resident #315 documented a focus, titled, SKIN INTEGRITY RISK:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to provide ongoing person-centered activities designed to meet the interest and the psychosocial well-being of 3 of 20 residents, Residents #35, #36 and #103, reviewed for activities. The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #35 documented diagnoses to include Dementia, unspecified, Major Depressive Disorder, and Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of the care plan dated 03/02/23 documented an outlined activity plan that included: Activities: The resident needs encouragement to pursue activities of choice. Little interest or pleasure in doing things, prefers to stay in room. o Resident will participate in activities of choice/ will accept materials for in room type activities. o Encourage to participate with activities of choice o Prefers/ would benefit from: General Activities Program o Prefers / would benefit from: In Room Activities o Preferred Activity Times: Morning o Preferred Activity Times: Afternoon o Preferred Activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequate supervision and assistance to prevent smoking accidents, for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #20. The findings included: Review of facility's Policy and Procedure, titled, Smoking/Tobacco Use (Effective October 2021, documented, in part: Employee Expectation: < Monitor residents in the smoking area. < Ensure appropriate adaptive smoking equipment is available and in use for residents as care planned. < Clean smoking apron after each use Procedure: < Initiate and complete admission data Collection and Initial Plan of Care Quarterly Date Collection Form Smoking Safety: < Staff member assigned to the smoking area will monitor the area to conduct walking rounds to observe and intervene for safety issues and to provide oversite and intervention when appropriate. < Provide the smoker with assistance and safety devices indicated. < Donning a smoking apron that is deemed necessary by the IDT. < The assigned staff member should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to perform catheter care using appropriate professional technique, for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #315. The findings included: The facility used a competency checklist instead of a policy/procedure to ensure perineal care/catheter care is performed correctly. The competency checklist step 5 stated: Cleans top of over bed table and places a barrier on tabletop. Step 9 indicates the staff is to perform hand hygiene. Steps 10 through 12 discuss positioning of the resident and preparing the wash basin with warm water. Step 13 verifies that staff has put on gloves. Step 14 verifies that staff has covered the resident with a bed sheet or bath towel. Step 15 indicated the staff is to place a protective barrier under the resident's buttocks. For a male resident the checklist indicates that the perineal area should be dried using a blotting motion from top to bottom. Resident #315 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it secured the resident's medications for 2 of 5 sampled medications carts observed, the North and South medication carts; failed to secure loose pills in one (1) of five (5) medications carts observed [NAME] medication cart; failed to discard expired wound care dressing in one (1) of three (3) treatment carts, [NAME] wing; and failed to discard expired Sunscreen lotion in Central Supply Room. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on [DATE] at 2:30 PM, titled, Medication Storage, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), reviewed 2007, documented, in part, in the Policy Statement: Storage of Medication - Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe effective drug administration. The medication supply shall be accessible only to the licensed nursing personnel,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing dental services to 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #103. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Nontraumatic Subdural Hemorrhage; Respiratory Failure; and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), section C dated 03/31/23, revealed the resident had severe impaired cognition. A Brief Interview for Mental Status score could not be determined. On 05/01/23 at 10:45 AM, Resident #103 was observed with noticeable bleeding gum and concerning dental hygiene issue. Further observation conducted on 05/03/23 at 11:19 AM showed evidence of blood in the resident's mouth and blood covered Resident #103's upper incisors. Review of the Medication observation record for the month of April and May 2023 revealed that staff performed daily oral hygiene as recommended by the resident's physician (morning and night). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accommodate individual food preferences for 5 of 5 sampled residents, Residents' #10, #13, #40, #55, and #86. The findings included: 1. Review of clinical record of Resident #10 on 05/03/23, revealed an admission date of 03/30/12 with diagnoses to include DDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DM 2), Chronic Kidney Disease, and Left & Right Leg AKA (Above knee amputations). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) of 01/30/23 documented: Sec B: Understood and Understands. Sec C: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Sec D: Mood - Poor Appetite, Trouble Concentrating, Sec G: Eat = Supervision/Set Up Only Sec K: NO Swallow Disorder Therapeutic Diet. Review of the updated MDS - Annual / Significant Change assessment, dated 05/23/23 noted: Sec C: BIMS Score changed to a 12. Observation and interview conducted with Resident #10 on 05/03/23 at 9:00 AM, noted the resident to be alert, oriented and able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-14 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policy and procedure, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it posted the current date for the Nurse Staffing Information for 2 of 5 posting areas observed. The findings included: Record review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Staffing, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) effective August 2024, documented in the Policy Statement: The Administrator and DON [Director Of Nursing] are responsible to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as required by federal law and sufficient staff to meet applicable state law requirements (include minimum staffing ratios.) .The facility Administrator and the DON should evaluate staffing on a daily basis Staffing: Daily Staffing Sheets 3. Post sheets daily .Other 1. Post the daily staffing hours . An observation on the entrance tour conducted on 05/14/25 at 9:10 AM and again at 10:23 AM revealed there was an Nursing Staff Posting Form located at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG-TERM CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FI-POMPANO REHAB, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/30/2012
FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG TERM CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/18/2025
JAFFE, HOWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2012
KATZ-HALL, KATHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
MULLARKEY, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
RICHMOND, PENNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2012
ANU HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2025
CONSULTING SUPPORT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2025
FACILITY SUPPORT COMPANY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025
KANE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025
HOLNESS, HYACINTHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2018
IZQUIERDO, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/07/2022
OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2003
SELECT REHABILITATION, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/19/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$168K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 8%Other / private 11%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $168K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$315per resident / day
operating cost
$9,580per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105572. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next