Sarasota Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

26.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 128.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from abuse. The facility neglected to have effective processes in place in the secured unit to supervise 15 (Residents #13, #6, #14, #1, #2, #15, #16, #17, #3, #4, #7, #8, #10, #9, #12) of 15 cognitively impaired residents with aggressive behaviors resulting in multiple avoidable resident-to-resident altercations. On 3/12/25, Resident #13 with known aggressive behavior towards others was not adequately supervised. Resident #6 was blocking the door to the hallway. Resident #13 hit Resident #6 to get past him. On 3/12/25, Resident #14 with known aggressive behavior towards others was not adequately supervised. Resident #14 ran into Resident #13 with her wheelchair then hit Resident #13. On 3/14/25, Resident #2 with a diagnosis of dementia with other behavioral disturbance wandered unsupervised into Resident #1's room. Resident #2 scratched Resident #1's cheek when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement processes on the secured dementia unit to ensure adequate supervision of 15 (Residents #13, #6, #14, #1, #2, #15, #16, #17, #3, #4, #7, #8, #10, #9, #12) of 15 cognitively impaired residents with aggressive behaviors to prevent multiple avoidable incidents of resident-to-resident physical altercations. On 3/12/25, Resident #13 was not adequately supervised. Resident #6 was blocking the door to the hallway. Resident #13 hit Resident #6 to get past him. On 3/12/25, Resident #14 was not adequately supervised. Resident #14 ran into Resident #13 with her wheelchair then hit Resident #13. On 3/14/25, Resident #2 wandered unsupervised into Resident #1's room. Resident #2 scratched Resident #1's cheek when she asked him to leave the room. On 3/18/25, Residents #15, #16 and #17 were not adequately supervised in the activity room of the secured unit. Resident #15 hit Resident #16. Resident #17 then hit Resident #15. On 3/20/25, Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent repeated falls for 3 (Residents #1, #2 and #3) of 3 residents identified to be at risk for falls and sustained multiple falls at the facility, including falls with injuries requiring emergent transfers to acute care hospitals. The findings included: The facility policy titled Fall and Injury Reduction Policy, effective March 2023 indicated the policy was to assist the facility with reducing the likelihood of a fall or injury while maintaining or maximizing dignity and independence through education of staff and residents, early identification of risk factors by collecting data, identifying resident behaviors which may increase the likelihood of such occurrence. 1. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/1/23. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an assessment reference date of 11/8/23 noted the resident's cognition was severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to follow infection control procedures to prevent the potential spread of scabies to residents, staff and visitors in 1 (Memory Care Unit) of 3 units.The findings included:Review of the Facility policy and procedure titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program with an effective date of October 2021 revealed, The Infection Prevention and Control Program is comprehensive program that addresses detection, prevention and control of infections and communicable diseases among residents, visitors, volunteers, and personnel. Goals: (a) Provision of a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. (b) decrease the risk of infection and communicable diseases development and transmission to residents, visitors, volunteers, and personnel. (c) Monitor for occurrence of infections and communicable diseases and implement appropriate prevention measures to reduce occurrences.Review of the Facility Policy and Procedure Scabies: Management effective August 2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have documentation of a thorough investigation for an injury of unknown origin for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prevention Program with a review date of September 2025, revealed, The facility has designated and implemented processes, which strive to reduce the risk of abuse . Investigation: NHA [Nursing Home Administrator] or designee is notified and will initiate and conclude a complete and thorough investigation within the specific timeframe. Investigation may include but may not be limited to: Resident statements/interviews; Employee statements/interviews . Observation of resident(s), staff, environment . Re-enactment of event .Review of the clinical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 1/1/24 with a most recent admission date of 9/22/25. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur, unspecified dementia, and anxiety disorder.Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the health, welfare and rights of each resident by failing to ensure 1 (Staff A) of 5 staff reviewed was screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property before beginning employment. The findings included: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program effective 2012 and most recent change date of November 2024 revealed, The facility has designated and implemented processes, which strive to reduce the risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident's property . Implementation and ongoing monitoring . Potential employees will be screened, per federal &/or state regulation, during the hiring process for history of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of residents. Screening will consist of . Criminal background checks will be completed to identify any potential employee unfit to work in LTC (Long Term Care) . Review of the facility's current employees list revealed Staff A was a dietary aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the resident or the responsible party's right to be informed of the risks, benefits, side effects, and alternatives of psychotropic medications administered by the facility to 1 resident (#7) of 3 reviewed for informed consent for psychotropic medications. The findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had diagnosis of non-Alzheimer's dementia. The resident's diagnosis list did not include anxiety, depression, or psychotic disorder. The resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 7/30/24, the physician certified the resident was incapable of making informed medical decisions because the resident could not understand the consequences. The resident's son was appointed as health care surrogate (HCS) on 7/29/24. The HCS was responsible for making health care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate one (Resident #1) of two residents surveyed for an injury of unknown origin when the injury was identified as being an older injury the facility failed to look back at an injury which had occurred three days prior to the injury being assessed and investigate if the injury had occurred during that same time period. The findings included: Resident #1 is a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Cerebral Infarct, Schizophrenia, Dementia, Bipolar Disorder, Hemiplegia of the left side, Anxiety, EPS, Chronic Pain, and Osteoarthritis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS) score of 00. This score shows a severe cognitive impairment. Section GG of the MDS shows Resident #1 was dependent on staff for providing personal care and mobility of transferring and toileting. A progress note dated 6/20/24 at 5:36 p.m. reads, Staff notice resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the delivery of social services for discharge and transfer assistance for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge and transfer from the facility. The findings included: Review of the facility Social Work policy effective February 2021 revealed, The facility will provide an adequate number of staff to provide for the medically related social services needs of resident/patient(s). The Social Worker/designee .function as the Discharge Planner and are responsible for formulating the initial discharge plan and projected discharge date .Identify and seek ways to support residents' individual needs and preferences, customary routines, concerns and choices. Review of the record revealed Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of toxic encephalopathy (A brain disease that can cause memory loss, seizures and coma.) and dementia. Review of the care plan by the social worker initiated on 4/24/24 revealed Resident #7 and the family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure they maintained communication between the nursing facility and the dialysis center related to the ongoing assessment of a dialysis resident before and after each dialysis treatment for 1 (Resident #24) of 1 resident who was receiving dialysis. The findings included: The facility's undated policy titled, Dialysis Management (Hemodialysis) stated the facility would coordinate care and services for hemodialysis residents . Complete the Dialysis Communication Tool before and after dialysis and follow up on any special instructions from the dialysis center. The Dialysis Communication Tool form instruction stated the purpose of the form was to maintain communication between the dialysis provider and the facility clinical staff. The nurse assigned to the resident scheduled for dialysis would ensure a dialysis communication tool was completed and sent with the resident to the dialysis center. Nursing would ensure sections 1, 2 and 3 were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide or obtain dental services to meet the needs of 4 (Resident #25, #44, #45, #94) of 6 residents reviewed for dental services. The findings included: The facility Dental Services Policy and Procedure effective March 2023 stated, The facility will assist residents in obtaining routine care, 24-hour emergency dental care and denture replacement in the case of loss, damage, or ill-fitting dentures. This dental care may be provided in-facility or by scheduling and transporting to a dental provider. In case of an emergency the resident will be transported to a facility that provides emergency dental services. Whenever possible the facility will secure a dental contract to provide in-house dental services; If an in-house dental contract is not available, the facility will maintain a dental provider list in the community that will provide dental services to the residents; The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
  Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of the facility's policy and procedure and staff interview, the facility licensed for 169 beds failed to ensure the full-time social worker had the required qualifications. The findings included: On 6/1/124, review of the daily census showed 119 current residents. Review of the facility Policy and Procedure for Social Services effective February 2021 noted, The facility strives to ensure the Social Services staff have qualifications that are commensurate with State and Federal regulations, defined job responsibilities, applicable licensure law, regulation and applicable certification to meet the residents/patient's needs . On 6/4/24 at 9:10 a.m., the Social Service Director said she became the full-time Social Worker at the facility in March 2024 when the previous Social Worker left. She said she held a bachelor's degree in social work; however, she did not have one year of supervised social work experience in a health care setting working directly with individuals. On 6/4/24 at 6:00 p.m., in an interview the Regional Consultant said the previous social worker left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to obtain a Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNRO) in accordance with the advanced directives of 1(Resident #92) of 2 residents reviewed for code status and advanced directives. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #92 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, and Parkinson's disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of [DATE] noted the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4. The Quarterly MDS assessment with a target date of [DATE] noted a BIMS score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment). Review of the resident's advance directives dated February 5, 2024, noted Resident #92 designated his sister as durable power of attorney. This designation did not include health care decisions. Review of the physician's orders revealed on [DATE] the physician issued a Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNR), directing the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$230,102 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

• $9,580 — penalty dated 2025-01-14
• $161,457 — penalty dated 2025-01-14
• $6,032 — penalty dated 2024-06-05
• $6,180 — penalty dated 2024-06-05
• $46,853 — penalty dated 2024-01-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG-TERM CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $224K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL