Windsor Woods Rehab And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 99.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-08-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure proper nutritional enhancements were provided as ordered for one resident (#56) of three residents sampled for nutrition resulting in a 6.1% wieght loss in 48 days. Findings included: On 8/02/22 at 3:00 P.M., An observation and interview was conducted with Resident #56. The resident stated the menus never change and she does not get what she orders. She stated if she gets food she does not like and the alternate is not good she just does not eat at all. Resident #56 stated she has lost weight. On 8/3/22 at 8:45 A.M.an interview was conducted with Resident #56. The resident stated no one from Dietary has been in to see her and/or talk with her regarding supplements or her weight loss. She asked if there was a way for her to have supplements added to her meal tickets. On 8/03/22 at 10:30 A.M.a review of the medical record revealed the following weights recorded for Resident #56: 06/05/22- 120.2 pounds 07/08/22- 113.1 pounds 07/16/22- 112.3 pounds 07/23/22-112.9 pounds A review of the medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation related to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for toileting hygiene for four (#2, #4, #5, #6) out of four sampled residents. Findings included: During an interview on 04/24/2025 at 1:08 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the aide staff works 8-hour shifts. The DON verified after reviewing the toilet hygiene documentation that the aides were not documenting every day, every shift they were providing incontinence care / toileting hygiene. The DON confirmed documentation was missing. The DON verified the incontinence care was to be documented under the toileting hygiene. 1. Review of Resident #2's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to generalized osteoarthritis, dysphagia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, diabetes, anemia, seizures, pressure ulcers dementia, mood affective disorder, osteoporosis, neuromuscular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive person-centered care plan related to providing toileting care with a two-person assist for one (#2) of eight sampled residents. Findings included: During an interview on 04/24/25 at 1:08 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #2 initially told the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift aide on 02/26/2025 about her finger hurting. The DON stated she went to Resident #2s room, and Resident #2 alleged a person (unknown at the time) came into her room the night before and hit her hand a couple hundred times. The NHA and the DON stated during their investigation Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who cared for Resident #2 on the 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. shift on 02/26/2025 stated she provided incontinence care alone. The NHA stated Staff A, stated the resident was combative during care. The NHA stated during the investigation it was noted that Resident #2 was dependent for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hospice plan of care was developed and coordinated to include communication between the facility and hospice provider related to activities of daily living (ADLs) for one (#3) of three residents reviewed for hospice care. Findings included: Review of an event progress note for Resident #3 revealed on 4/21/25 at 1: 00 p.m., a Hospice CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reports to nurse that open areas occurred while giving [Resident #3] a shower. The resident has provided the following description of the event: Unable to say what happened. The following type of event is noted: Skin alteration - Details of the event are as follows: Hospice CNA was showering Resident when open areas were obtained and reported. Preventative interventions related to this event included - continue with protective sleeves. A Change in Condition evaluation completed on 4/21/25 showed Resident #3's skin changes were - skin tear Left elbow, right forearm, and right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinent supplies to meet resident needs for five (Residents #73, #35, #22, #49, #61) of 47 residents sampled. Findings Included: 1. An interview was conducted on 06/03/24 at 11:45 a.m. with Resident # 61. She stated staff ran out of incontinent briefs yesterday evening and she was not able to be changed. She stated staff only had a size small, and she wears an extra-large and/or extra extra-large and a small would not fit. She stated staff had to run to [local store] to pick up briefs for residents. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) showed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, unspecified convulsions, primary insomnia, and anxiety disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed: - Section C Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. - Section I with heading genitourinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level I readmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurate for four residents (#15, #18, #68, #98) of 21 residents sampled for PASRR review. Findings Included: 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, and unspecified dementia. Review of the Level I PASRR dated 10/25/23 showed qualifying diagnoses were not checked or indicated, and that no Level II PASRR was required. An interview was conducted on 06/06/24 at 12:55 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON). She stated Resident #68 PASARR dated 10/25/23 was incorrect as Depression was not marked under Mental Illness or Suspected Mental Illness and a Level II should have been completed as resident had a secondary diagnosis of dementia and diagnosis of depressive disorder. The DON stated this (PASRR) would need to be corrected. 2. A review of the admission Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not ensure compression stockings were ordered for one (Resident #46) of one resident sampled for chronic right lower leg swelling. Findings included: On 6/3/24 at 10:45 a.m. during an interview and observation with Resident #46, he said his left leg swelling was constant because the compression stockings the facility provided was too small to fit his leg. Resident #46 presented a package of extra-large white compression stockings. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). Resident #46 said the swelling in his leg was making it difficult for him to walk. Observation of Resident #46's right lower leg and foot was noticeable larger than the left leg. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). A review of Resident #46's admission record showed diagnoses to include generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility and fatigue. Review of the occupational therapy (OT) daily treatment note dated, 4/30/24 by Staff D, OT, showed attempted to see patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to identify triggers related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) which may retraumatize a resident and failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan with interventions that could minimize or eliminate the effect of the triggers for two (Resident #15 and #12) out of two sampled residents. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record for Resident #15 showed he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, depression, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Section C Cognitive Patterns of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating cognitively intact. Section I Active Diagnoses of the MDS showed the resident had diagnoses of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were administered timely for one (Resident #87) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A review of the admission Record for Resident #87 showed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of encephalopathy. The lab report with an order date of [DATE] showed a wound culture was rejected on [DATE] at 1:01 p.m. due to unable to process specimen due to collection with expired supplies. Swab received expired on [DATE]. The urinalysis with micro, reflux to urine culture lab report conduced on [DATE] showed preliminary results were received on [DATE] that showed the resident had >100,000 colony-forming unit per milliliter (cfu/ml) gram positive cocci possible enterococcus species identification and sensitivities to follow. The final report approved [DATE] showed >100,000 cfu/ml gram positive cocci enterococcus faecium this isolate is vancomycin resistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Forty-two medication administration opportunities were observed, and three errors were identified for two residents (#38 and #7) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 7.14% medication error rate. Findings included: On 6/5/24 at 9:00 a.m., Staff N, LPN was observed preparing and administer administering Resident #38's medications. She prepared and administered the following medications aspirin Low dose 81 mg, hydrochlorothiazide Oral Tablet 12.5 mg, vitamin D and Tylenol regular str 325 mg. A review of Resident #38's physician orders revealed aspirin EC tablet delayed release 81 mg was ordered (photographic evidence obtained) and not administered as prescribed. On 6/5/24 at 9:15 a.m., Staff N, LPN was observed preparing and administer administering Resident #7's medications. She prepared and administered the following medications Aricept 10 mg, Aspirin EC Tablet Delayed Release 81 mg, vitamin B-12 1000 mcg, Claritin 10 mg, Colace 100 mg, Effexor XR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store medications in a safe and secure manner 1) in four medication carts (two A Wing and two C Wing) of four medication carts observed, and 2) for three residents (#16, #63, and #82) of forty one residents sampled. Findings included: 1) A review of the facility provided policy titled 4.1 Storage of Medications, dated 09/18 revealed the following: Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations to maintain their integrity and to support safe effective drug administration. The medications supply shall be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medication. Procedures: 1. The provider pharmacy dispenses medications is containers that meet state and federal labeling requirements, including requirements of good manufacturing practices established by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). On 08/03/2022 at 2:59 p.m., an observation of the (C Wing) 200 Back Hall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG-TERM CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $136K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL