Titusville Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 93.5 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 64 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-07 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedure related to Full Code status leading to a delay in initiating Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Advance Directives of a total sample of 68 residents, (#100). Resident #100 a-[AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included anemia, type II diabetes, occlusion and stenosis of the carotid artery. The resident was admitted to Hospice services on [DATE] with diagnosis of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The resident's physician's order dated [DATE] noted full resuscitation. Progress note dated [DATE] at 6:30 AM, documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A read, Patient has expired Hospice notified MD (Medical Doctor) notified. Resident #100 died at the hospital on [DATE]. The facility's failure to provide CPR in a timely manner as per resident #100's wishes and physician's order placed all residents in the facility at risk, and could lead to potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff was available on 1 of 3 units to meet residents' needs related to the timely administration of scheduled medications, (Unit 2).Findings: Cross Reference F755 1. During a medication pass observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A on 6/03/26 at 10:05 AM, eight residents listed on the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) appeared in red, indicating their scheduled morning medications had not yet been administered. When asked why the residents' names appeared in red, LPN A stated the morning medications were past due. She explained nurses were expected to administer 9:00 AM medications between 8:00 AM and 10:00 AM. LPN A prepared and administered medications for resident #4 at 10:33 AM. Upon completion of the medication administration at approximately 10:40 AM, LPN A stated medication administration required significant time to complete because residents could not be rushed, often required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards of practice by: failing to appropriately dispose of medications during medication administration for 1 of 2 residents reviewed during medication pass observations (#4); failing to accurately account for and document controlled substance administration and maintain security of medications for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for narcotic administration, (#11); and failing to administer medications according to physician orders and the facility's established medication administration schedule for 10 residents on 1 of 3 units reviewed, out of 19 sampled residents, (#1, #3, #5, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, and #19). Findings: Cross Reference F725, F867 1. During a medication pass observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A on 6/03/26 at 10:05 AM, she indicated nurses were expected to administer 9:00 AM medications between 8:00 AM and 10:00 AM. While preparing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one of one residents sampled for wound treatments, of a total sample of 19 residents, (#3).Findings:Medical record review revealed resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included colostomy, pressure ulcers to his left heel, right and left buttock and left hip.A colostomy is a surgical opening in the abdomen to allow stool to exit the body when it cannot pass through the rectum. It connect the large intestine to the outside of the body and stool is collected in a pouch worn on the outside, (retrieved on 6/17/26 from www.hopkinsmedicine.org).Review of current physician orders revealed resident #3 had physician orders for colostomy care every shift starting 6/18/25; wound care orders every day and night shift for right great thumb on 2/16/26, wound care every night shift for a left plantar callus dated 4/20/26, wound care every night shift for sacrum and right and left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee implemented, monitored, evaluated, and revised a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to address identified concerns related to narcotic accountability and diversion prevention. The facility failed to ensure corrective actions were sustained after identifying repeated narcotic management concerns, resulting in continued deficiencies related to narcotic accountability, documentation, and medication management practices.Findings: Cross Reference F755 Review of a report submitted to the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) on 4/14/26 for alleged misappropriation of property revealed the facility identified 28 missing Oxycodone tablets pertaining to resident #1. Following completion of the investigation, the facility determined there was a discrepancy between the number of narcotic cards received by a nurse and the number documented on the narcotic accountability records, resulting in the potential for a one-card discrepancy. In a joint interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) / Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee conducted performance improvement activities to ensure prior improvement measures were sustained. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure, QAPI Facility Plan dated 10/19/25, revealed the QAPI committee monitored progress to ensure that interventions or actions were implemented and were effective in making and sustaining improvements.The facility had a deficiency cited at F842 for complete and accurate medical records during the previous recertification survey conducted 6/03/24 through 6/07/24. During this survey, the facility was found to again be in noncompliance with F842. As a result of this repeat deficiency, it was identified there was insufficient auditing and oversight to prevent the citation.On 3/06/26 at 5:10 PM, the Administrator stated the facility had a QAPI committee that met monthly. He explained that the committee reviewed several areas which included information obtained during rounds on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being by failing to prevent a facility acquired pressure ulcer, implement revisions to the pressure ulcer care plan after a change in wound status, and failing to implement physician orders for existing pressure ulcers for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, of a total sample of 44, (#7, & #107).Findings: 1.Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, peg tube (feeding tube in stomach), type two diabetes, and brain damage from low oxygen. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident #7 was severely impaired cognitively, he was dependent for all activities of daily living (ADL) and had no pressure injury. The MDS assessment revealed the resident was dependent on the helper for all functional abilities and the resident did none of the effort to complete.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure frying pans, refrigerated foods, and spices were stored under clean and sanitary conditions, dry food was stored at the appropriate temperature; prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner to prevent food borne illness, by failing to maintain potentially hazardous pureed and regular foods at the correct hot holding temperature for four residents on a puree diet, and 57 residents on regular house diet, of a total population of 93 residents.Findings:On 3/02/26 at 10:25 AM, the initial kitchen tour was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). In the walk-in refrigerator there was visible food debris and residue along the baseboards and corners. The CDM stated there was a weekly deep clean schedule but could not say when the last time a deep clean was done. In the food preparation area, two spice bins had a visibly sticky residue and debris in the bottom of the container. (photo evidence obtained) The CDM acknowledged the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident rights in regard to self-determination for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for reviewed for choices, of total sample of 44 residents, (#63). Findings: On 3/02/26 at 10:14 AM, resident #63 said she was unhappy at the facility, didn't feel like she belonged, and had requested a transfer. She expressed she preferred to be outside as much as possible, and this facility only allowed residents to exit the building if they smoked. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #63 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 13/15, indicating she was mostly cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and was unable to move from the waist down. The assessment indicated she had a history of traumatic brain injury, was able to use the internet, hold a conversation, and recall events. Review of resident #63's medical record indicated she sought assistance on 12/05/25 from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for care plans, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#99). Findings: Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder, morbid obesity, and muscle wasting. The hospital transfer form indicated the resident was blind. On 3/02/26 at 1:11 PM, resident #99 remarked she was mostly blind, and needed cataract surgery. She explained the facility had her sign financial paperwork without explaining it to her. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #99 had severely impaired vision but was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance from staff. Review of resident #99's care plan revealed no interventions related to her blindness or impaired vision. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a nurse progress note dated 2/08/26 which indicated resident #99 was legally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to include wound management for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#36).Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #36, an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted from an acute care hospital on 9/19/25. The resident's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, adult failure to thrive, malnutrition, heart disease, muscle wasting and atrophy of multiple sites, and left lateral forehead squamous cell carcinoma (skin cancer).The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/03/25 noted resident #1 scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status that indicated intact cognition. The skin and wound assessment documented there were no surgical wounds or care during the look-back period.On 3/03/26 at 9:05 AM, resident #36 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,369 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,369 — penalty dated 2024-06-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR LONG-TERM CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $208K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL