Kissimmee Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent development of a pressure ulcer and promote healing of a newly identified area of skin breakdown for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#96). The facility's failure to implement preventative interventions consistent with the resident's risk for skin breakdown, and failure to initiate treatment according to accepted standards of practice resulted in actual harm, development of a stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer. Findings: Resident #96 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 6/12/21 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of weakness, partial paralysis after a stroke, and dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 9/19/21 revealed resident #96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. He required extensive assistance of two people for bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity in dining for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#51). Findings: Review of resident #51's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety. Review of resident #51's Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 12/6/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. On 2/26/25 at 3:23 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H explained the interventions in place to assist resident #51. During the conversation, CNA H described resident #51 by saying, she is a feeder. CNA H affirmed that was the term used to refer to the residents who required assistance eating. CNA H asked, Should we not call them like that? Later, on 2/27/25 at 1:59 PM, CNA H repeated, She is a feeder while pointing to the eating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify emergency contact and Power of Attorney of changes in medication for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for notification of emergency contact, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#20). Findings: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy (seizures), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, dementia type 2 diabetes, altered mental status, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. The admission Record contained essential information including resident #1's selected emergency contacts with their associated telephone numbers. The document listed the resident's son as emergency contact #1 and the healthcare Power of Attorney. Resident #1's daughter was emergency contact #2. The hospital transfer form dated 1/23/25 revealed that resident #20 required a surrogate when making healthcare decisions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was evaluated for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#5). Findings: Review of resident #5's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from a short-term, acute hospital on 2/03/25. Her diagnoses included coronary artery disease, lymphedema, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 12/31/24 revealed resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS assessment noted rejection of care necessary to obtain goals for her health and well-being occurred 4 to 6 days, but less than daily, during the look-back period. On 2/27/25 at 11:06 AM, resident #5 was observed in bed with a medication cup containing various pills on her bedside table, along with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and neglect to the State Agency (SA) and protect the resident during the investigation for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#56). Findings: Review of resident #56's medical records revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from a short-term, acute hospital on 1/01/25. Her diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis that affects the lower half of the body), anemia, psoriasis (skin disorder), major depressive disorder, and coronary artery disease. Review of resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 12/02/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS assessment noted her primary language was Spanish, and she wanted an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff. The Mood section revealed resident #56…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected fall with major injury status for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#109). Findings: Resident #109's medical record revealed he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on 2/11/25. His diagnoses included osteomyelitis (bone infection), difficulty walking, and femur fracture. On 2/24/25 at 11:40 AM, resident #109 stated he fell coming out of the bathroom about 3 weeks ago, and broke his right femur; he said he was transported to the hospital but did not have surgery. Review of resident #109's MDS Discharge Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/25/25 and a 5-day assessment with an ARD of 2/18/25 revealed that his fall status was incorrectly assessed. On 2/27/25 at 5:15 PM, MDS Transitional Nurse K explained he was responsible for completing this MDS. He acknowledged both MDS's did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized comprehensive care plan was implemented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for seizure safety precautions, (#92); and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for communication, (#56), of a total sample of 59 residents. Findings: 1. A review of the medical record revealed resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (fluid on the brain), epilepsy (seizure disorder), autistic disorder, speech disturbances, and mood disorders. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Annual assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/11/24 revealed resident #92 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that could not be conducted as the resident was rarely or never understood. A review of the resident's medical record revealed current comprehensive care plans with a focus on seizure disorders related to epilepsy. Interventions included seizure medication as ordered and padding to side rails. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement appropriate interventions including the provision of adequate supervision to prevent falls for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#3 and #51). Findings: 1. Review of resident #3's medical record revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from a short-term, acute hospital on 8/14/24. Her diagnoses included senile degeneration of brain, type 2 diabetes, dementia, glaucoma, bilateral hearing loss, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/10/24 revealed resident #3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment showed resident #3's hearing was highly impaired, and her vision was impaired. She required supervision for eating, and substantial assistance from staff for toileting,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the needs and interests of 1 of 5 residents reviewed for activities, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#58). Findings: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, hypertension, and open-angle glaucoma with borderline findings. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Annual assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/14/25, revealed resident #58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 12/15, which indicated mild cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed that resident #58 was visually impaired and required large print in newspapers and books but not regular print. A review of the resident's comprehensive care plan revealed the resident's activities should be compatible with physical and mental capabilities, such as large print holders, if the resident lacked hand strength and task segmentation. On 2/25/25 at 9:52 AM, Activity Aide R…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for 1 of 1 sampled residents who receive hemodialysis, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#12). Findings: Review of resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 5/30/24. His Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 5/15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. His diagnoses included: end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and unspecified dementia with unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance. Review of resident #12's medical record revealed physician's orders dated 4/16/24 for hemodialysis to occur on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at Dialysis Center #1. Review of resident #12's medical record revealed no documentation of communication having occurred between staff from Dialysis Center #1 and the facility nursing staff from 1/01/25 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the administration of medications in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain, of a total sample of 59 residents, (#18). Findings: Review of resident #18's medical record revealed he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and osteoarthritis of knee. Review of resident #18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/27/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5/15, which indicated he was cognitively impaired. The MDS assessment noted no rejection of evaluation or care necessary to obtain his goals for health and well-being. Review of resident #18's medical record revealed a care plan for acute/chronic pain related to disease process and general discomfort revised on 9/05/22. The interventions directed nurses to administer analgesia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HARBORVIEW HEALTH SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL