Harborview Sarasota

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 76.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-05-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of policy and procedures and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect vulnerable residents' rights to be free from abuse by failing to ensure residents were protected from mental and verbal abuse for 4 (Residents #699, # 700, #800 and #850) of 4 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. The findings included: The facility policy Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation implemented 3/1/22 (revised 3/1/23) documented, It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse. Instances of abuse of all residents irrespective of any mental or physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance as outlined in the resident's care plan and according to residents' preferences for 4 (Residents #1, # 2, #55 and #90) of 7 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's).The findings included:The facility policy Activities of Daily Living implemented 3/1/22 (revised 3/1/25) specified, The facility will, based on a residence comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a residence abilities in ADL's do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The facility will maintain individual objectives of the care plan and periodic review and evaluation. 1. On 3/30/26 at 1:27 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in his room in bed. In an interview,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and facility policy the facility failed to ensure that 5 (Licensed Practical Nurses Staff H, Staff N, Staff O, Staff P, and Staff Q) of 5 Licensed Practical Nurses reviewed had appropriate skill sets, and certifications to administer intravenous antibiotic therapy (IV) for 2 (Residents #73 and #66) of 3 residents reviewed for IV Therapy.The findings included:Review of facility policy Intravenous Therapy date implemented 3/1/22, date reviewed/revised 3/1/25 documented: The facility will adhere to accepted standards of practice regarding infusion practices in accordance with state regulations. Definitions: Intravenous (IV) Therapy is the administration of parenteral fluids or medications through an IV catheter to treat a condition. Compliance Guidelines: (14) The Registered Nurse or certified Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) will evaluate the associated risks due to IV fluid administration (15) IV documentation is recorded in the nurses' notes and/or Medication Administration Record. Continuous Infusion, IV push and intermittent medication infusion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure and staff interviews, the facility failed to have documentation that 2 (Residents #73 and #66) of 3 residents reviewed, received intravenous antibiotics as ordered. Missed dosages of antibiotics could jeopardize the residents' health and safety. The findings included:A review of the Facility's Policy Medication Administration with a date implemented of 3/1/22, documented, Medications are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice . 12b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician. Sign MAR (Medication Administration Record) after administered. 22. Report and document any adverse side effects or refusals. 23. Correct any discrepancies and report to nurse manager.Review of the clinical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 2/27/26. Diagnoses included chronic osteomyelitis right foot and ankle (infection of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer and/or administer the flu and/or pneumonia vaccine for 5 (Residents #8, #2, #92, #49, and #66 ) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, with a revision date of 2/1/25 indicated: 7. Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization a. Residents will be offered the influenza vaccine each year between October 1 and March 31, unless contraindicated or received the vaccine elsewhere. B. Residents will be offered the pneumococcal vaccines recommended by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), upon admission, unless contraindicated or received the vaccines elsewhere.On 3/31/26 review of Resident #8's clinical record revealed that the legal representative consented to the pneumococcal vaccine on 10/3/25. The clinical record lacked documentation that the vaccine was administered. There was no documentation of contraindication for the vaccine.On 3/31/26 review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed a consent form for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 5 (Residents #8, #2, #92, #49, and #66 ) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations were offered and administered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization was medically contraindicated.The findings included:On 3/31/26 clinical record review for Resident #8 revealed the resident's legal representative consented to the COVID-19 vaccine on 10/3/25. The clinical record lacked documentation that the vaccine was administered or that the vaccine was contraindicated.On 3/31/26, review of the clinical record review for Resident #2 revealed a COVID-19 consent form dated 10/3/25. The area to document whether the resident wanted to receive or declined the COVID-19 vaccine was left blank. The clinical record lacked documentation that the resident accepted or declined the vaccine or that the vaccine was contraindicated.On 3/31/26, clinical record review for Resident #92 revealed a COVID-19 consent form dated 10/3/25. The area to document whether the resident wanted to receive or declined the COVID-19 vaccine was left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, sanitary and homelike environment that emphasizes and enhances resident comfort for the residents in the 100, 200, and 400 halls.The findings included: Review of the facility policy Resident Personal Belongings implemented 3/1/22 (revised 1/1/26) documented It is the policy of this facility to protect the residents right to possess personal belongings, such as clothing and furnishings, for their use while in the facility. All resident possessions, regardless of their apparent value to others will be treated with respect. The facility will support the residents' right to retain and use personal possessions to promote a home-like environment and maintain their independence. The facility will ensure resident belongings are kept in a neat and orderly fashion and maintained in each residents room. On 3/30/26 at 10:00 a.m., during an initial tour of the 100 hall the following observations were noted: 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to have documentation of fall investigations and failed to implement care planned interventions to reduce the risk of avoidable accidents for 1 (Resident #999) of 3 residents reviewed with multiple falls at the facility.The findings included: Review of the facility policy Fall Prevention Program implemented 3/1/22 (revised 1/1/25) revealed, Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls.High Risk Protocols:a. The resident may be placed on the facility's Fall Prevention Program.i. Indicate fall risk on care plan.Implement appropriate interventions.c. Provide interventions that address unique risk factors measured by the risk assessment tool.d. Provide additional interventions as directed by the resident's assessment, may include but not limited to:i. Assistive devices.ii. Increased frequency of rounds.iv. Low bed.8. Interventions will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to contain and eradicate common household pests.The findings included:Review of the facilities Pest Control Program policy (last revised on 3/1/2022) stated, it is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicated and contains common household pests and rodents. The policy further states effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (e.g., bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitos, flies, mice and rats).Review of the facilities Resident Environmental Quality policy (last revised on 3/1/2025) states the facility shall maintain an effective pest control program so the facility is free from pests and rodents.On 12/8/25 at 9:04 a.m., in an interview Resident #2 said she has a problem with bugs. She said there were little cockroaches in the bathroom. She has let everyone know but they were still there. She said there are times she won't take a shower because of the cockroaches.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and procedure, and resident, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 1(Resident #999) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living.The findings included:Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) implemented 3/1/22 (revised 6/1/25) documented, A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #999 had an admission date of 1/25/23 with a re-admission date of 8/22/25. Diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur on 8/22/25, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, anxiety, and fracture of right femur 2/8/23.Review of the End of Part A stay Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 10/24/25 documented Resident #999 required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary interventions to prevent the development of avoidable pressure ulcers for 1(Resident #799) of 3 residents identified as at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The findings included: The facility policy Pressure Injury Prevention and Management initiated 3/1/22 (revised 3/1/23) documented, this facility is committed to the prevention of avoidable pressure injuries unless clinically unavoidable and to provide treatment and services to heal the pressure injury, prevent infection and the development of additional pressure injuries. Pressure ulcer injury refers to localized damage to the skin and or underlying soft tissue usually over a Bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The facility shall establish and utilize a systematic approach for pressure injury prevention and management including prompt assessment and treatment intervening to stabilize reduce or remove…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$43,839 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $43,839 — penalty dated 2025-05-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HARBORVIEW HEALTH SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL