Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Of Melbourne
3033 Sarno Rd, Melbourne, FL 32934 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 167 certified beds · (321) 255-9200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $6,949 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-02)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.3% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.1% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.8% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.3% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.1% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.4% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.9% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.3% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.40 | 2.13 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.8%CMS range 33.4–56.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.9–17.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 64.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 67.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.3–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 167 beds and averages 162.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper indwelling urinary catheter care and monitoring was provided to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheter, of a total sample of 5 residents, (#2).Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #2, an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 2/02/26 with diagnoses that included anemia, elevated white blood cell count, and complicated urinary tract infection (UTI). The resident discharged home on 2/10/26. The most recent Five-day Minimum Data Set Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 2/09/26 noted resident #2 scored 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment revealed there were no rejections of evaluation or care, the resident was dependent on staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), there was an indwelling urinary catheter present, and she received high-risk anticoagulant, diuretic, opioid, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete antibiotic stewardship program for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (#117, #81, and #21) of a total sample of 55 residents and failed to ensure linens and laundry were handled, stored, processed, and transported safely to prevent the spread of infection to the extent possible in accordance with accepted national standards of practice.1. Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnoses including chronic pressure ulcer of right ankle with necrosis of muscle, osteomyelitis, peripheral vascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. Review of an Infectious Disease Consult dated 10/28/25 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with medication orders for Cefepime HCl intravenous 2 grams per 100 milliliters (ml) two times and Daptomycin-sodium chloride intravenous 700-0.9 milligrams per 100 ml once a day following a right lower extremity wound culture which tested positive for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received meals at an appetizing temperature.Findings:On 11/18/25 at 9:35 AM, resident #9 said his food was always cold. He said he complained multiple times in the past, but things never changed. The resident stated, I just eat it.On 11/17/25 at 4:47 PM, resident #160 said her food was cold every day. She said she complained about it and the Kitchen Manager knew. The resident stated, this place doesn't want to get the warm plates; I eat what I can.On 11/20/25 at 11:42 AM, one of two carts (insulated) for the 500-unit resident lunch meal was delivered. At 11:44 AM, the second cart (not insulated) was delivered to the unit.On 11/20/25 at 12:10 PM, the last lunch meal tray was delivered to room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 12:11 PM, a sample tray with the lunch meal of fried chicken, rice, pinto beans, and corn bread was tested by two surveyors. The food was lukewarm and not at a palatable temperature, which was consistent with multiple resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility's Administration failed to provide resources and equipment to ensure meals were delivered at palatable temperatures. Findings:On 11/20/25 at 10:55 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) said the kitchen utilized heat lamps on the steam table to assist with retaining warm food temperatures. She said the plates did not have metal inserts for heat retention. She said she was aware of ongoing resident complaints about cold food and had requested nine insulated carts to accommodate all three units but received only one new insulated cart. She said non-insulated carts that did not retain heat had to be used to manage all the trays for unit delivery.On 11/20/25 at 11:42 AM, one of two carts (insulated) for the 500 unit resident lunch meal was delivered. At 11:44 AM, the second cart (not insulated) was delivered to the unit. At 11:44 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A was observed distributing meal trays to resident rooms. On 11/20/25 at 11:52 AM CNA B said there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) / Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee conducted performance improvement activities to ensure prior improvement measures were sustained. Review of the facility's survey history revealed repeat deficiencies related to accuracy of assessments, quality of care and infection control during the current survey ending on 11/02/23. Past deficiencies revealed systemic concerns with similar findings on the previous recertification survey dated 11/2/23.On 11/20/25 at 6:15 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) indicated repeat deficiencies regarding infection control, and quality of care were different from the issues from the previous survey. Their current Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) initiated from February 2025 and still ongoing included hand hygiene; glucometer disinfection; blood pressure monitoring/parameters/orders; point of care documentation; oxygen discontinuation and order accuracy. The NHA explained that they meet monthly and they would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) results for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for PASARR of a total sample of 55 residents, (#94).Findings: Review of resident #94's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included mood disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and intellectual disabilities.Review of resident #94's MDS Annual assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/05/24 revealed question A1500 on Section A read, Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability (ID) or a related condition? The answered selected was NO.Review of resident #94's MDS Annual assessment with ARD of 10/06/25 revealed question A1500 on Section A was also answered NO.Review of resident #94's medical record revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State mental and intellectual disability authority after a significant change in the resident's mental condition for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) of a total sample of 55 residents, (#94).Findings:Review of resident #94's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included mood disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and intellectual disabilities.Review of resident #94's medical record revealed a Florida PASARR Level II Determination Summary Report dated 4/19/23. The Outcome/Disposition section showed resident #94 met the state definition of Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and Intellectual Disabilities (ID) and was appropriate for a nursing facility. The form showed Socialized Services were not deemed necessary, but it recommended rehabilitative services of lesser intensity be added to the comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 out of 1 resident of a total sample of 55 (#164).Resident #164 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, nicotine dependence, cigarettes, uncomplicated dependence on supplemental oxygen and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #164 was cognitively intact with a brief interview of mental status score (BIMS) of 15 out of 15.Review of the smoking assessment listed resident #164 as a safe smoker on 4/15/24 it also included the verbiage smoking is always supervised; the smoking attendant holds cigarettes and lighter.A review of the social services notes on 11/5/25 at 4:00PM stated It has been reported that a strong cigarette odor has been coming from resident #164's bathroom. She has previously been caught…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with the resident's physician orders for 1 out of 2 residents, (#164), failed to ensure medications were administered and provided per physician orders to prevent missed doses in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents, (#99), reviewed for quality of care, out of a total sample of 55 residents. Resident #99, a [AGE] year-old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses that included acute transverse myelitis in demyelinating disease of central nervous system, generalized anxiety disorder, and major depression. Review of resident #99's admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed he had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13 out of 15, which indicated intact cognitive function. He had no rejection of care behavior and received scheduled pain medications for occasional pain that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain timely dressing change orders for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), failed to timely change the PICC dressing, failed to obtain timely intravenous (IV) flush orders, and failed to administer the IV flushes in accordance with accepted standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for IV antibiotics in a total sample of 55 residents (#52).Findings: Review of resident #52's medical record revealed he was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included a displaced fracture of the right femur, sepsis, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and urinary retention. Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency caused by your body's overwhelming response to an infection. (Retrieved from www.clevelandclinic.org on 12/08/25). MRSA is a type of bacteria that many antibiotics don't work on. MRSA most often causes skin infections, but it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and provide ongoing monitoring of identified past trauma for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Trauma Informed Care, of a total sample of 55 residents, (#25, #84).Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #84, a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alcohol Abuse, Adult Failure to Thrive, Moderate Dementia with Anxiety, Other Psychoactive Substance Abuse, Anxiety Disorder, Convulsions, Weakness, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The most recent Comprehensive Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/16/25 noted during the look-back periods, resident #84 scored 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Cognitive Patterns were assessed with continuous/non-fluctuating behaviors of inattention and disorganized thinking. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their grievance process related to preferences for 2 of 2 resident reviewed for grievances, (#1, #3). Findings 1.A review of the medical record revealed that resident # 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, major depressive disorder, unspecified psychosis and schizoaffective disorder. According to the Annual assessment of the Minimum Data Set with the assessment reference date of 9/30/25, the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which means he was cognitively intact, and was dependent on staff for hygiene care. On 10/8/25 at 10:06 AM, resident # 3 who was selected from the facility's grievance log was observed being wheeled into the shower room. At 10:50 AM, resident #3 was observed coming out of shower room and answered only yes to everything is okay, staff treated him well him well and could not remember filing a grievance. On 10/8/25 at 1:47 PM the Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to appropriately implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during high-contact care activity for 1 of 6 residents (#5) requiring EBP on the Specialized Subacute Unit (SSU). The facility had a total of 20 residents who required EBP in a census of 154 residents. The facility capacity is 167 beds.On 10/08/25 at approximately 10:50 AM the light above the door to resident #5's was illuminated to indicate the resident was calling for assistance. Certified nursing assistant (CNA)- A was observed to obtain and don a mask from a caddy (container) hanging on the door across the hallway and she entered the room. She was overheard to say to the resident, I will be right back to help you get dressed. The resident was in a private room.A sign on the door to resident #5's room read STOP. ENHANCED…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to grievances identified by resident council. Findings: During Resident Council meeting on 11/01/23 at 3:30 PM, members of Resident Council verified they met monthly. The members stated several grievances had been voiced regarding laundry, linen, nurse staffing, staff speaking other languages and dietary. The residents in attendance agreed the same concerns were voiced month after month without a resolution. The group expressed no one ever responded to the grievances and informed them of what was done. The resident council members were not aware of any grievances that had been filed on behalf of Resident Council. Review of Resident Council minutes from May 2023 through October 2023 revealed several repeat grievances concerning staff not speaking English, staff on cell phones, quality of linen and various dietary concerns. On 11/01/23 at 5:00 PM, the Activity Director stated she attended every Resident Council meeting along with her assistant. She explained the Resident Council agreed to have an open invitation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate notices of financial liability for 2 of 3 resident reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification, out of a total sample of 63 residents, (#53 and #96). Findings: 1. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unspecified mood affective disorder and personal history of transient ischemic attack. Review of resident #53's financial record revealed she began Medicare Part A skilled nursing stay on 4/01/23 with last covered day on 4/28/23. She had Medicaid as her primary payer effective 4/29/23. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review revealed resident #53 received a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) at the end of her Medicare Part A stay but did not receive a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN). 2. Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman in writing, by phone, or in person for a facility-initiated emergency transfer/discharge for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for [NAME] Act and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 63 residents, (#561, #562 and #626). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #561 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] from the hospital. His diagnosis included type II Diabetes, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, mood disorders, history of traumatic brain injury, suicidal ideation, and anxiety disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge-Return Anticipated assessment with assessment reference date of 3/16/22 revealed resident #561 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the physician's progress note dated 3/16/22 indicated the resident was emergently transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans to reflect current transfer status for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents, (#1); accurate oxygen administration orders for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, (#56 and #57); failed to provide the opportunity to participate in review and revision of the plan of care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Care Planning, (#154); and failed to updated code status for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Advance Directives, (#148), out of a total sample of 63 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans revealed the intent .to promote seamless interdisciplinary care for our residents by utilizing the interdisciplinary plan of care based on assessment, planning, treatment, service and intervention. The document indicated the purpose to ensure residents received individualized, goal-directed care based on their needs through appropriate interventions, and provide a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishes were rinsed at the appropriate temperature and with the proper level of sanitizer with regard to the dish machine's data plate and manufacturer's instructions and failed to maintain equipment in a safe condition. Finding: On 10/30/23 at 10:25 AM, during kitchen observation, staff were observed running dishes through the dish machine. The temperature dial on the dish machine did not register the rinse temperature. The Data Plate on the machine noted the rinse temperature should be 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) acknowledged the gauge was not registering the water temperature on the rinse cycle. She explained the dish machine was a low-temp chemical machine. Dietary Aide K was observed as she removed wet plates from the dishwasher, stacked them and placed them in the plate warmer with other plates. The CDM asked Dietary Aide K to test the chemical parts per million (ppm). Dietary aide K removed a container of test strips from the top of the dish machine, opened the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program developed and implemented timely and appropriate plans of action to prevent repeat deficient practices related to respiratory care. Findings: Cross reference F641, F657, and F695 Review of the facility's survey history revealed repeat deficiencies related to accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, timing and revision of care plans and failure to ensure oxygen delivery per physician order during the current survey ending on 11/02/23. Past deficiencies revealed systemic concerns with similar findings on the previous recertification survey dated 2/03/22 for accuracy of MDS assessments and revision of care plans and on the past two previous recertification surveys (2/03/22 and 10/20) for oxygen delivery per physician orders. In an interview on 11/02/23 at 4:48 PM, the Administrator was unable to say what changes were made after the last survey to ensure the same concerns with MDS assessments, care plans and oxygen delivery did not reoccur. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to proper infection control practices for cleaning of a glucometer to prevent the potential transmission of bloodborne pathogens for 1 of 2 residents tested for blood glucose levels, (#75), out of a total sample of 63 residents; and failed to ensure staff used proper hand hygiene during meal service with the potential to spread infection to residents on the [NAME] Wing. Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes and end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis. Review of the Medication Administration Record revealed resident #75 had a physician order dated 10/14/23 for Novolog Flexpen ReliOn Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 units per milliliter to be injected according to a sliding scale, two times daily. Resident #75 had a care plan for Diabetes, initiated on 5/20/22, which directed nurses to obtain blood glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the right to make choices about significant aspects of activities of daily living related to the preferred method and frequency of baths for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for choices, out of a total sample of 63 residents, (#624 & #617). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #624 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, left leg below-knee amputation, generalized muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/22/23 revealed resident #624 had clear speech, was able to express his ideas and wants, and understood others. The document showed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 out of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section F of the MDS assessment, Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities, revealed resident #624 felt it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents wishes for a Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNRO) were honored for 1 of 2 residents, (#6), and failed to ensure residents had the capacity to make health decisions and sign for a DNRO for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives, from a total sample of 63 residents, (#107). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #6 was admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, atherosclerosis (arterial narrowing and clotting) of the heart and both legs, heart rhythm malfunction, presence of a cardiac pacemaker, and paranoid schizophrenia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Annual Assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] noted the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that indicated she was cognitively intact. The assessment showed she had disorganized thinking that fluctuated in severity, and had not rejected evaluation or care. The Comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected transfer status, (#1), and vision status, (#15), at the time of the assessments, for 2 of 63 sampled residents. Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral atherosclerosis, heart disease, anxiety and depression. Review of the MDS Quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/24/23 indicated resident #1 required extensive assistance from two or more staff for transfers between surfaces including to or from the bed and wheelchair. On 10/31/23 at 10:10 AM, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) Q and R transferred resident #1 from her bed to a reclining wheelchair with a mechanical lift. CNA R explained the resident required a mechanical lift for all transfers as she could not stand, follow directions, or assist staff. On 11/01/23 at 11:47 AM, CNA P stated she was regularly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer residents with a newly evident mental disorder for Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation and determination for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for PASARR, out of a total sample of 63 residents, (#37 and #83). Findings: 1. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, heart failure and unspecified dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/09/23 revealed resident #37 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The document indicated her active diagnoses included depression (other than bipolar), psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia) and unspecified mood [affective] disorder. Review of resident #37's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of major depressive disorder with an onset date of 7/18/17, unspecified psychosis with an onset…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures and adhere to professional standards related to wound care and treatment for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, out of a total sample of 63 residents, (#47). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy of the lower legs, and difficulty walking. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Medicare Part A Stay assessment with assessment reference date of 10/06/23 revealed resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The document showed he had skin tears and nonsurgical dressings. Review of the medical record revealed resident #47 had a care plan for fall-related skin tears to his right and left arms, initiated on 10/12/23. The goals noted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to arrange services in a timely manner to ensure access to appropriate prescription glasses, (#15); and failed to provide glasses to maintain vision abilities, (#154), for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for Vision/Hearing out of a total sample of 63 residents. Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis, seizures, chronic pain, insomnia, and need for assistance with personal care. Resident #15 had a care plan for glasses to correct visual impairment initiated on 8/31/22 and revised on 7/05/23. The goal noted the resident would not experience a decline in visual function or have indicators of acute eye problems. The interventions included arrange consultation with an eye practitioner as required, monitor and report symptoms of acute eye problems, and remind the resident to wear her glasses when up. On 10/31/23 at 9:50 AM, resident #15 explained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered according to physician orders for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, out of a total sample of 63 residents, (#56 and #57). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including shortness of breath, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change in Status assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/24/23 revealed resident #57 used oxygen. The resident had a care plan for oxygen therapy related to shortness of breath initiated on 6/16/23. The interventions included oxygen setting of 2 liters per minute (L/min) continuously via nasal cannula. Review of the medical record revealed resident #57 had a physician order dated 8/03/23 for oxygen at 2 L/min as needed that was discontinued on 10/26/23. On 10/30/23 at 12:08 PM, resident #57 wore his nasal cannula with one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and secure storage of medication to prevent access by unauthorized persons for 1 of 2 medication carts on the East Wing (400 hall). Findings: On 10/30/23 at 5:47 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) G stood at his cart and prepared medications for administration. He removed one pill from a blister pack and placed it in a small plastic cup. RN G recalled he had not yet checked the resident's blood pressure and pulse, so he placed the cup in top drawer of the medication cart and entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. The medication cart was located against the wall, across and down the hallway from room [ROOM NUMBER]. RN G did not lock the medication cart and on inspection, all drawers opened freely and medications were easily accessible. While RN G was in room [ROOM NUMBER], a resident exited the room next to the medication cart and propelled his wheelchair in close proximity to the open drawers. When RN G exited room [ROOM NUMBER], he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide follow up dental services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Dental out of a total sample of 63 residents, (#154). Finding: Review of the medical record revealed resident #154 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an Assisted Living Facility, with diagnoses of abdominal wall abscess (infection), stroke, mood disorder, anxiety, and dementia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 8/23/23 noted the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that indicated the resident was not cognitively impaired. The assessment showed the resident required staff support and assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). On 10/31/23 at 11:38 AM, resident #154 was visibly distressed when he explained he had been waiting for follow up dental services for months since he was seen by the facility's Dentist. He said the provider recommended partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure required built up utensils and weighted cup were provided for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition of a total sample of 63 residents, (#41). Findings: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, difficulty swallowing after stroke, chronic lung disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #41 was cognitively intact but required one-person physical assist for eating supervision. Review of the Order Summary Report dated 11/02/23 revealed resident #41 had a physician's order for a regular diet with regular texture and nectar thickened fluids. The order report also showed an Occupational Therapy (OT) clarification order for resident #41 to have a blue 8 ounce (oz.) weighted cup with blue lid and built-up utensils with all meals dated 7/27/23. Resident #41 had a care plan for increased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain smoking pole ashtrays to promote a safe environment in the designated smoking area; and failed to ensure hot water was available in two of three shower stalls in the [NAME] Wing shower room. Findings: 1. On 1/31/22 at 1:13 PM, during a tour of the facility's designated smoking area, a moderate amount of smoke was noted coming from the holes at the top of a smoking pole ashtray. The Activities Coordinator was alerted to the smoke by a resident who stood nearby. He quickly walked towards the ashtray, removed the top half of the unit, and used a nearby green plastic watering can to put out smoldering cigarette butts in the base of the container. The Activities Coordinator validated the base of the ashtray contained a thick layer of cigarette butts over two inches deep. Inspection of the two additional smoking poll ashtrays in the smoking area revealed they contained a thick layer of butts, also over two inches deep. He acknowledged ashtrays left in this condition could be fire hazards. He stated either…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-03 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected Range of Motion (ROM) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for ROM (#258, #27) failed to accurately assess bowel continence for 1 of 1 resident (#61), failed to identify discharge status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge, (#1), failed to accurately assess dental status for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dental, (#32, #27) and failed to accurately assess active diagnoses for 1 of 5 residents, (#27) out of a total sample of 65 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #258 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, heart failure, acute embolism and thrombosis, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non dominant side. Review of the Hospital Discharge Summary revealed the resident had chronic contracture left upper and lower extremity consistent with previous CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), left sided weakness. The resident's admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for splinting to prevent worsening of contractures for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for mobility of a total sample of 65 residents, (#27, #46, #74, and #137). Findings: 1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, stroke with left side weakness and paralysis affecting left dominant side, and nerve damage to hands and feet. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed resident #27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. The assessment showed the resident did not reject evaluation or care that was necessary or his health and well-being. The MDS assessment did not include the resident's active diagnoses and it did not reflect his functional limitation in Range of Motion (ROM). The documents indicated resident #27 did not received therapy or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) to ensure appropriate placement and evaluation for specialized services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Level II PASARR, of a total sample of 65 residents, (#62). Findings: Resident #62 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included End-Stage Renal Disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, and hepatic failure. Review of the resident's Level I PASARR dated 9/17/21 revealed Section IV: PASARR Screen Completion read, Individual may not be admitted to a Nursing Facility. Use this form and required documentation to request a Level II PASARR evaluation because there is a diagnosis of or suspicion of indicated a Dx [diagnosis] of/or suspicion of . Serious Mental Illness. Guidance included in Appendix PP of the State Operations Manual read, The resident's Level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan to address necessary care and services for tracheostomy, oxygen, suctioning, feeding tube, activities of daily living, and pain management for 1 of 9 newly admitted residents, (#111); and failed to ensure the baseline care plan summaries were reviewed with the resident or resident representative within 48 hours for 3 of 9 newly admitted residents, (#111, #303, #258), out of a total sample of 65 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, convulsions, tracheostomy status and gastrostomy status. Review of the medical record revealed an Admission/readmission Data Collection form dated 1/11/22 at 9:39 PM, which showed special treatments and procedures for oxygen, tracheostomy, seizures, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. On 2/03/22 at 5:45 PM, review of resident #111's medical record with Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans related to oxygen use for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, (#138). Findings: 1. Resident #138 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Review of resident #138's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], Section O, revealed she was received oxygen while a resident and prior to admission to the facility. Section J of the MDS assessment indicated resident #138 suffered from shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion, when sitting at rest, and when lying flat. Review of the medical record revealed a physician's order dated 12/17/21 that read, oxygen as needed PRN 2 liters via [nasal] cannula. The order was discontinued and a new order dated 2/01/22 read, Oxygen as Needed PRN (as needed) 4 liters/via [nasal] cannula. Review of resident #138's medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans within 7 days of completion of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter (#61) and for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for participation in care planning (#149), of a total sample of 65 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes type II, intervertebral disc degeneration lumbar region, anxiety disorder, cardiac pacemaker, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of the resident's medical record revealed physician's orders dated 11/29/21 for a urinary catheter size 16, change catheter as needed, and catheter care every shift as needed. Review of the resident's admission MDS assessment with Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 12/04/21, revealed the resident's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15. Section H of the MDS assessment revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to schedule follow-up care with an orthopedic physician in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident with a right wrist /hand fracture and right-hand cast, of a total sample of 65 residents, (#58). Findings: Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Corona Virus 2019 disease, wedge compression fracture 5th lumbar vertebra, fracture of the right wrist and hand, generalized muscle weakness, and fall. Review of the Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form dated 11/20/21 revealed the resident's diagnoses included right radius fracture, and she had a closed reduction the right radius surgical procedure performed. Discharge instructions from the hospital dated 11/25/2021 read, To make appt [appointment] for MD [Medical Doctor], GI [Gastroenterologist], Oncology, Pulmonology. An undated, handwritten note read, Patient needs a follow-up ortho appointment for cast and screws in the right arm following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dressing changes for seven days for a midline intravenous (IV) catheter according to current professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents with IV catheters of a total sample of 65 residents, (#260). Findings: Resident # 260 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sickle cell disease, convulsions, and respiratory failure. An admission / readmission Data Collection form dated 1/28/22 indicated the resident was alert and oriented to person, place, and time, and had no vascular access IV present. On 2/02/22 at 11:30 AM, resident #260 had a midline IV catheter noted in his right upper arm with a dressing dated 1/25/22. The transparent dressing that measured approximately 4 centimeters (cm) x 5 cm and covered the midline IV insertion site. The edges of the dressing were noted to be loose and not secured to the skin. Resident #260 said, I came from the hospital with this midline dressing. I told the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) therapy was administered as per physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for O2, of a total sample of 65 residents, (#62). Findings: Resident #62 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included End Stage Renal disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, and hepatic failure. Review of the medical record revealed a physician's order dated 1/31/22 for Oxygen 3 liters per minute (L/min) continuously every shift for shortness of breath (SOB). A progress note dated 2/01/22 at 5:52 PM indicated resident #62 had labored breathing SOB on exertion SOB lying flat . Oxygen is used via nasal cannula 3 L/min . On 2/01/22 at 9:46 AM, resident #62 was observed with O2 infusing via nasal cannula at 4.5 L/min. The resident stated he was not sure of the correct setting for his oxygen. On 2/01/22 at 9:52 AM, Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 10 of 12 required monthly drug regimen reviews were completed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications, Psychotropic Medications and Medication Regimen Review, out of a total sample of 65 residents, (#2). Findings: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including depressive disorder, hypertension, long term use of insulin, type 2 diabetes and left hip pain. Review of the medical record revealed resident #2 had physician orders for Duloxetine 60 milligrams (mg) daily for depression, Hydroxyzine 25 mg three times daily for anxiety, Aspartame insulin 100 units/ml (milliliter) inject four units three times a day for diabetes, Detemir Solution insulin 100 units/ml inject 20 units at bedtime for Diabetes, Spironolactone 25 mg give once daily for diuresis, Trulicity Solution Pen-Injector 0.75 mg/0.5ml inject 1 dose every Saturday morning for diabetes, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$6,949 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $6,949 — penalty dated 2023-11-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HARBORVIEW HEALTH SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARBORVIEW MELBOURNE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/15/2024 |
| ADAMS, AMANDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| BALLOUT, HUSSIEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| LEIBOWITZ, CHAIM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| DAHAN, MICHELLE | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| ENGLANDER, SHMUEL | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| KLEIN, JOSEPH | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| LEIBOWITZ, ELIYAHU | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| SOKOLOFF, RIVKA | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105861. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.