Harborview Lumberton

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 109.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.479 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and Physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received wound care and treatment to a new surgical site following admission for a left below knee amputation. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non-pressure related wound care (Resident #112).Findings included: Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare following left below knee amputation. Review of Resident #112's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed to apply xeroform (a petroleum gauze used for wound healing, that keeps the wound moist and halts bacteria growth), 4 x 4 gauze, ABD pad (an absorbent dressing that pulls exudate (wound fluid) away from the wound bed) and wrap with Kerlix (type of gauze that absorbs fluid and provides cushion) and apply ace wrap (provides compression) daily. The discharge summary was signed as reviewed by Unit Manager #1. The baseline care plan dated 5/13/26 signed by Nurse #1 revealed Resident #112…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, Registered Dietitian, Wound Care Physician, and the Medical Director's interviews the facility failed to 1a.) implement treatment orders on admission and provide daily wound treatments as ordered for a resident (Resident#17) with a chronic venous wound on the left lower extremity. b.) obtain daily weights as ordered for Resident #17 who had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure and on fluid restrictions. 2a.) provide treatments as ordered for a resident with arterial ulcers (Resident #24). b.) obtain weekly weights as ordered for Resident #24 with edema, fluid retention and an elevated Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) level ( a blood test used to monitor fluid volume status that when elevated is a strong indicator of heart or kidney failure or infection) and required close monitoring and treatment with a diuretic, a medication used to remove excess fluid. 3.) provide daily wound treatments to non pressure related wounds (Resident #93). This occurred for 3 of 7 residents who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, Physician, and the Consultant Pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to hold the medication Midodrine when Resident #95 's systolic blood pressure was above 120 mm Hg (millimeters of mercury) or give the medication when the systolic blood pressure was less than 120 mm Hg. Resident #95 experienced no significant outcome. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication administration. Findings included: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypotension. Record review revealed the following active orders: Midodrine 10 MG (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for hypotension hold if sys (systolic) > (greater than) 120 or dys (diastolic) > 80; Start date 01/08/25. Midodrine 10 MG (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday for hypotension hold if sys > 120 or dys > 80; Start date 01/08/25. Review of the Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to discard expired medications, record an opened date on a multi-dose oral inhaler that had a shortened expiration date, and refrigerate unopened ophthalmic drops according to the manufacturer's guidelines on 2 of 5 medication carts (400 hall, 800 hall) and in 2 of 2 medication storage rooms (300 hall, 400 hall) that were reviewed for medication storage. Findings included. 1.) An observation of the 400-hall medication cart on 04/02/25 at 11:19 AM revealed the following medications: One bottle of Latanoprost .005% ophthalmic drops that was unopened and not refrigerated. Review of the manufacturers guidelines for Latanoprost ophthalmic solution instructed to store unopened bottles under refrigeration at 2° to 8°C (36° to 46°F). Once a bottle was opened for use, it may be stored at room temperature up to 25°C (77°F) for 6 weeks. Fluticasone propionate salmeterol (Advair diskus)100 micrograms (mcg)/50mcg that was in use with no opened date labeled on the inhaler. Fluticasone propionate salmeterol inhaler (Advair diskus)100…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date an opened food item in 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerator and failed to remove expired containers of milk from 2 of 3 nourishment rooms (Secured Unit and East Wing). These practices had the potential to affect food service for the residents. The findings included: a. The initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager on 3/31/2025 at 10:50 AM revealed an open package of sliced turkey in the walk-in refrigerator that was not labeled and dated. An interview with the Dietary Manager was conducted on 3/31/2025 at 11:00 AM. The Dietary Manager stated that all open food in the kitchen was supposed to be labeled with an opened date and an expiration date. She further stated she was going to discard the package of turkey because it was not labeled and dated. b. A tour of the East Wing nourishment room with the Dietary Manager on 3/31/2025 at 11:05 AM revealed a container of 2% milk with the expiration date of 3/29/2025. c. A tour of the Secured Unit nourishment room with the Dietary Manager on 3/31/2025 at 11:08…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and the Wound Care Physicians interviews, the facility failed to notify the Wound Care Physician for evaluation and treatment of a Stage IV (full thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament or bone)pressure wound on the left trochanter (boney protrusion on the femur bone) that was present on admission. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for wound care (Resident #1). Findings included. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a Stage IV pressure wound to the left trochanter, protein calorie malnutrition, and anemia. An admission note dated 3/8/25 at 3:01 PM documented by Nurse #11 revealed in part; Resident #1 admitted to the facility from the hospital on 3/8/25 at 12:18 AM. Resident #1 was non-verbal and required total care. Contractures noted of all extremities. Wounds to the left hip and sacrum were noted, with dressings clean, dry and intact. A physicians order dated 3/8/25 for Resident #1 revealed calcium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff, Wound Care Physician, and the Medical Director's interviews the facility failed to 1.) conduct an initial wound assessment on admission for a Stage IV (fullthickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament or bone) left trochanter (bony protrusion on the femur bone) wound to include the wound description with measurements and perform daily wound care treatments according to the physicians orders for a resident (Resident #1) admitted with a stage IV pressure wound and who developed a stage II (partial thickness skin loss involving the dermis) pressure wound on the sacrum and lower back following admission. 2.) provide daily wound care to a stage IV pressure wound (Resident #71). This occurred for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1, Resident #71) reviewed for pressure wound care. Findings included. 1.) Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a Stage IV pressure wound to the left trochanter, protein calorie…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and the Physician's interviews, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered for a resident (Resident #1) who was a new admission and receiving enteral feedings (tube feeding). This occurred for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Stage IV pressure wound to the left hip, protein calorie malnutrition, and anemia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. She had no rejection of care. The care plan dated 3/18/25 revealed Resident #1 received enteral tube feedings and was at risk for dehydration. Interventions included in part to observe, document, and report signs or symptoms of dehydration or sudden weight loss. An order dated 3/21/25 for Resident #1 revealed weights per policy. Review of Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed the following: 3/08/25 no admission weight was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, Physician and Consultant Pharmacist's interviews, the Pharmacist failed to identify and address during the monthly medication regimen reviews that a resident's Midodrine 10 mg (milligrams) prescribed for hypotension was administered outside of the set parameters 38 times during January 2025, 44 times in February 2025 and 15 times in March 2025 when the Consultant Pharmacist completed her monthly March review on 03/14/25. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #95) reviewed for medication administration. Resident #95 experienced no significant outcome. Finding included: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypotension. Record review revealed the following active orders: Midodrine 10 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for hypotension hold if sys (systolic) > (greater than) 120 or dys (diastolic) > 80; Start date 01/08/25. Midodrine 10 mg give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day every Tuesday,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to provide rehabilitation services per the resident's plan of care. This was for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 93) reviewed for rehabilitation services. Findings included Review of Resident #93's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] through 3/17/25. The discharge summary indicated Resident #93 remained functionally dependent and required skilled nursing facility placement upon discharge from the hospital due to mobility and activity of daily living (bathing, dressing, and toileting) limitations. Physical and occupational therapy was recommended to continue at the skilled nursing facility with possible transition to long-term care. The discharge summary indicated it was important that Resident #93 continued with range of motion exercises. Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sacral pressure ulcer and stroke. Resident #93's physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HARBORVIEW HEALTH SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC