Macgregor Downs Health Center by Harborview

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 527 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 209 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 143.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews with pest control staff, resident and facility staff, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent an infestation of mice and to protect a vulnerable resident from mice. On 7/1/24 Resident #18 was in bed when she felt something touch her foot. She pressed her call bell for assistance and when Nurse Aide (NA) #7 responded the NA pulled the blankets off the bed and a mouse jumped out of the bed and onto the floor. On 7/7/24 Resident #18 was in bed when NA #7 pulled the covers down to provide care and a mouse jumped out of the bed and onto the floor. On 7/26/24 Resident #18 saw a mouse running across the floor of her room. Resident #18 was shocked when the mouse was in her bed, and she was afraid of being bitten by a mouse. Mice are known to carry multiple diseases that can be life threatening. Diseases can spread by rodent bites and contact with their feces, urine, and saliva. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to attend care plan meetings for 1 of 28 residents reviewed for care planning (Resident #53).Findings included:Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #53 was moderately cognitively impaired. The care plan for Resident #53 was initiated on 2/12/24 and last revised on 3/26/26.Record review revealed a late entry note written by Social Worker #1 on 3/31/26 stated a care plan meeting was held with only the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) (the facility Social Worker and the MDS Nurse) in attendance. The Responsible Party (RP) was invited but did not attend. The record also revealed advanced directives and code status were reviewed. An interview with Resident #53 was conducted on 4/27/26 at 11:26 AM. Resident #53 stated she did not get invited to care planning meetings. She went on to say she feels her RP is not acting in her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to clean and maintain window curtains, the flooring underneath medical equipment, and the packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) in a resident's room for 1 of 28 resident rooms (Resident #6) on 1 of 6 halls observed for environment. The findings included: Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that she was severely cognitively impaired. An observation of Resident #6's room on 4/27/26 at 1:45 PM revealed both (two in total) window curtains had scattered red stains on them. There were also two pools of brown liquid underneath the tube feeding pole to the right of the head of the bed. It was also observed that dust like black bits, fragments, and pieces were on top of and inside the PTAC near the insertion site of the filter. Additional observations of Resident #6's room were conducted on 4/28/26 at 8:13 AM and 4/29/26 at 9:07 AM both observations revealed the two window curtains had scattered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner, Physician, Responsible Party (RP), and Hospital Case Manager, the facility failed to allow Resident #129 to return the facility after being transferred to the hospital for evaluation for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #129).Finding included:Resident #129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His active diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (a permanent type of hearing loss caused by inner ear damage), bilateral unqualified visual loss (significant vision reduction in both eyes that has not been specifically categorized as either low vision or blindness), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and asthma.Medical record review from admission on [DATE] through 4/18/26 revealed no evidence of behaviors for Resident #129. A late entry progress note dated 4/20/26 completed by Nurse #1 revealed Resident #129 was observed kneeling on the floor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to store a sugar scoop in a manner that prevented the potential for cross contamination by storing the scoop in the bulk sugar bin with the scoop handle touching the sugar. This was for 1 of 3 pantry's observed. This had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: On 2/11/25 at 4:05 PM an observation of the bulk sugar bin in Hall 2 pantry revealed the sugar scoop was stored directly in the bulk sugar bin with the handle of the scoop in contact with the sugar. In an interview with Dietary Aide #1 at that time she stated she was assigned to the Hall 2 pantry that day. She reported that when she had gone on her break a little after 3:00 PM that day the scoop had not been in the sugar. She stated the sugar scoop should always be stored separately and not in contact with the sugar in the bin for sanitary reasons to prevent the potential for cross contamination. She reported this had probably been done by [NAME] #1. On 2/11/25 at 4:13 PM an interview with the Dietary Manager indicated a scoop should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #57 active diagnoses included influenza. Review of the signage on the door to Resident #57's room read in part, Droplet Contact Precautions. Everyone must: Clean hands before entering and when leaving room. Wear a gown when entering the room and remove before leaving. Wear surgical/procedure mask when entering the room. Remove immediately before leaving room. Wear gloves when entering room. Perform hand hygiene after removing gloves. During observation on 2/9/25 at 10:56 AM the Director of Nursing entered Resident #57's room with no gown or gloves and a surgical/procedure mask, touched the privacy curtain while speaking with Resident #57, washed her hands, and left the room. During an interview on 2/9/25 at 10:57 AM the Director of Nursing, upon looking at the signage on the door, stated she thought it was enhanced barrier precautions room instead of droplet precautions room and she should have put on a gown and gloves prior to entering the room. During an interview on 2/9/25 at 11:03 AM the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to assess the ability of a resident to self-administer medications and vitamins for 1 of 1 resident with medications observed at bedside (Resident #42). Findings included: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her active diagnoses included anemia, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and respiratory failure. Review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of Resident #42's electronic health record on 2/10/25 at 1:06 PM revealed there was no physician's order for self-administration of medications and no self-administration of medication assessment. During observation on 2/9/25 at 11:24 AM two medication cups with pills were observed in Resident #42's room on the resident's bedside table. There were no facility staff members in the resident's room. Resident #42 was in bed and the bedside table with the medication placed in front of her. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the resident's advanced directive was included in the resident's record and failed to provide written advance directive information and/or an opportunity to formulate an advance directive (Residents #105 and #114). This was for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for advance directive. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Residents' rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives dated 3/1/22 and reviewed/revised on 3/1/24 revealed it is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a residents' right to formulate an advance directive. On admission the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive. Upon admission, should the resident have an advance directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart as well as communicated to the staff. 1. Resident # 105 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF/ABN) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notices (Resident #89). Findings included: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #89's electronic health record revealed Medicare part A services began on 1/6/25. The resident's last covered day of Medicare Part A was 1/19/25. Resident #89 remained in the facility following her discharge from Medicare Part A. There was no evidence a SNF/ABN form was provided to the resident or resident representative. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 11:19 AM Social Worker #3 stated Resident #89's last covered date was 1/19/25 for Medicare part A. A SNF/ABN was missed and not provided to Resident #89 and it should have been. The SNF/ABN was used to provide the resident or representative information regarding what costs they would be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive care plan in the area of pain for 1 of 28 residents (Resident #114) whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed. Findings included: Resident #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of left leg fracture. A review of Resident #114's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was severely cognitively impaired. He had been on a scheduled pain medication regime. He had pain almost constantly. His pain affected his sleep and interfered with his daily activities almost constantly. Resident #114 rated his pain as a 10 on a zero to 10 scale with zero being no pain and 10 being the greatest pain. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) for pain was triggered. A review of Resident #114's comprehensive care plan dated as initiated on 1/27/25 did not reveal a focus area for pain. On 2/11/25 at 10:11 AM in an interview the MDS Director stated Resident #114's comprehensive care plan should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for placement of a lidocaine (topical pain medication) patch on a resident's left hip when the patch was applied to the resident's back. This was for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #114) reviewed for professional standards of practice. Findings included: Resident #114 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of left leg fracture. A review of Resident #114's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was severely cognitively impaired. He had been on a scheduled pain medication regime. He had pain almost constantly. His pain affected his sleep and interfered with his daily activities almost constantly. Resident #114 rated his pain as a 10 on a zero to 10 scale with zero being no pain and 10 being the greatest pain. Resident #114's active physician's orders as of 2/10/25 revealed a physician's order dated 1/16/25 for a lidocaine (topical pain medication) 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,023 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,023 — penalty dated 2024-08-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HARBORVIEW HEALTH SYSTEMS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC