Scott Lake Health And Rehabilitation Center
800 E County Rd 540a, Lakeland, FL 33813 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (863) 500-4015 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (28) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $80,408 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-01)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.3% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.7% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.6% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.1% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.4% | 10.5% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.9% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.1% | 9.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.07 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 1.15 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 406 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 233 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.7%CMS range 51.4–60.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 10.6–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 5.5–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
28 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect related to medications not being reconciled and accurately transcribed, not reporting abnormal lab values and abnormal blood pressures to a provider for one resident (#1) out of three residents reviewed. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Resident #1 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 8/22/25. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 10/1/25 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D after verification of removal of immediacy of harm. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 9/30/25 at 11:45 a.m. with the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1. The RR said Resident #1 was not given her required insulin from the time she arrived at the facility on 8/22/25 until the day she had to go to the hospital on 8/30/25. The RR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, hospital record review, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff was competent to reconcile hospital discharge medication orders, blood glucose levels were monitored for a diabetic resident, or recognize and respond to elevated blood pressures and abnormal lab results for one resident (#1) out of three residents reviewed. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition to Resident #1 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 8/22/25. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 10/1/2025 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D after verification of removal of immediacy of harm.Findings included: An interview was conducted on 9/30/25 at 11:45 a.m. with the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1. The RR said Resident #1 was not given her required insulin from the time she arrived at the facility on 8/22/25 until the day she had to go to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, hospital record review, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#1) of three reviewed for new admission orders was free from significant medication errors as evidenced by the resident not receiving the correct medications order upon admission. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Resident #1 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 8/22/25. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 10/1/25 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D after verification of removal of immediacy of harm. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 9/30/25 at 11:45 a.m. with the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1. The RR said Resident #1 was not given her required insulin from the time she arrived at the facility on 8/22/25 until the day she had to go to the hospital on 8/30/25. The RR said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance was implemented during a transfer for one resident (#1) of five residents sampled. Resident #1 was care planned to receive a mechanical lift transfer and on 07/01/2023 two staff members (G and H) verified the transfer status verbally from the resident and staff and failed to confirm the transfer status in the care plan. Resident #1 was assisted utilizing a stand and pivot transfer resulting in pain and subsequently an X-ray result identified an acute humeral neck fracture. Findings included: A review of Resident #1's admission Record documented an admission date of 04/01/2021. Her diagnoses information included: contractures of muscle, multiple sites; lack of coordination; muscle weakness (generalized); vascular dementia, unspecified severity; syncope and collapse and unspecified osteoarthritis. A review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section G - Functional Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure medications were stored in accordance with current professional standards for 6 of 6 medication carts, 2 of 4 medication storage rooms, and central supply storage.1. An observation on 4/21/2026 at 3:30 P.M. of the 100 Hall Top Medication Cart revealed:In the top drawer was one loose ciprofloxacin pill; the pill did not have a resident name.In the top drawer was a container of cholestyramine powder that expired on 3/30/2026.The bottom drawer of the medication cart contained 11 safety syringes that expired on 2/3/2026.An interview on 4/21/2026 at 3:35 P.M. with Staff M, Registered Nurse (RN) was conducted. Staff M, RN verified the medications in 100 Hall Top Medication Cart were expired and she said the medications should have been removed. Staff M, RN said all nurses are responsible for removing expired medications and cleaning the medication carts.2. An observation on 4/21/2026 at 4:05 P.M. of the 100 Hall Back Medication Cart revealed:In the second drawer was a medication card for olanzapine that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for eight residents (#63, #115, #61, #7, #98, #124, #82, and #95) out of nine residents sampled for call lights.Findings included:1. An observation on 4/20/2026 at 9:45 A.M. of Resident #63 revealed he was lying in bed; the call light was seen on the floor under the head of the bed.An observation on 4/21/2026 at 3:15 P.M. of Resident #63 revealed he was lying in bed; the call light was seen on the floor in the same position.A review of Resident #63's admission Record showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, dizziness and giddiness, and muscle weakness. A review of Resident #63's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed he required partial/moderate assistance for toilet hygiene needs and personal hygiene.A review of Resident #63's active care plan showed a Focus of (Resident #63) is at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurate for one (Resident #10) out of two Residents sampled for PASRR. Review of Resident #10's admission record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses not limited to schizoaffective disorder, depressive type (onset 8/10/2022), generalized anxiety disorder (onset 8/10/2022), major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate (10/03/2022), and insomnia (onset 7/11/2025).Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] for Medications, revealed the resident is taking an antidepressant and antipsychotic regularly.Review of Resident #10's psychiatric notes dated 4/15/2026 revealed Resident #10 had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, depression, anxiety, and insomnia. Diagnoses Rationale and Justifications for Resident #10's schizoaffective diagnosis revealed the resident's history shows the resident has chronic and consistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective resident call system in one room (113) of four rooms sampled for call light functioning.Findings included:On 4/20/2026 at 09:55 a.m., the following observations were made.Resident room (113) was observed with a malfunctioning call light.During an interview with Resident #36, on 4/20/2026 at 09:58 a.m., the Resident stated, The call light system has been broke 2-3 times in the past few days. The Resident proceeded to activate the call light and the call light was not functioning. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 4/22/2026 at 2:03 p.m. The NHA stated she was notified of the broken call lights in the above identified room. She stated her expectation is that the maintenance director tests all the call lights and repairs them immediately and that the staff is familiar with the call light policy and that training is provided on call light responses. During an interview with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) on 4/22/2026 at 12:27 p.m., the DOM said he does a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to personalize resident care plans leaving Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) to choose between one- or two-person assistance transfers for two residents (#1 and #2) of three residents sampled. Failure to develop, revise and implement personalized transfer care plans puts residents at risk for falls.Findings Included: During an observation made on 10/23/2025 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #1 was observed in a common area, sitting up in their wheelchair in front of the television. Resident #1 did not respond to the interview.During a telephone interview on 10/23/2025 at 10:33 a.m., with Staff A, CNA, The staff member said regarding the shift on 10/09/25, I gave resident #1 a shower and was in her room putting her into her Geri chair . I was using a Hoyer Lift Staff A stated there was another CNA in the room with her. Staff A stated not able to recall the name of the other CNA. Staff A stated the other CNA would not come forward, they are all scared they are going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-two medication administration opportunities were observed, and six errors were identified for two (#2 and #3) of two residents observed. These errors constituted a 27.27% medication error rate. Findings included: 1) On 12/30/24 at 8:32 a.m., observation of medication administration with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was conducted. Staff A, LPN dispensed the following medications for Resident #2: - 2 tablets of Vitamin B12 500 microgram (mcg) tablet over-the-counter (otc) - Vitamin C 500 milligram (mg) tablet otc - Fish Oil 500 mg softgel otc - Loratadine 10 mg tablet otc - Bumetanide 0.5 mg tablet - Gabapentin 300 mg capsule - Duloxetine 20 mg capsule - 2 capsules Guaifenesin 400 mg otc - Breo Ellipta inhaler 100 mcg/25 mcg - Acidophilus probiotic (lactobacillus acidophilus 0.5 mg - 10 million) The staff member reviewed 2 bottles - one white and one green otc bottles of probiotics before dispensing the one tablet of lactobacillus. Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to notify the attending physician or Hospice on a change of condition for one (#1) of one resident sampled. Findings included: On 12/30/24 at 9:04 a.m. Resident #1 was observed sitting upright in a low bed with a perimeter mattress, on either side of the bed were fall mats. The observation revealed the resident was wearing oxygen cannula and oxygen concentrator was running. The resident's eyes were open and did not respond verbally or reactively. Review of Resident #1's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, bipolar type schizoaffective disorder, unspecified recurrent major depression disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and unspecified severity unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance(s). Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed the following focus': - Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary and homelike environment for three (200, 300, 400) of four units related to: 1. heavy dust and debris build up on package terminal air conditioner (PTAC) unit filters in 17 resident rooms (415, 413, 412, 411 410, 409, 408, 404, 403, 402, 401, 213, 211, 209, 206, 202, 201) of 21 resident rooms, 2. bathroom shower stalls with rubber flooring strips not maintained and not secured to the floor in eight resident bathrooms (414, 405, 213, 211, 209, 206, 202, 201) of 11 resident bathrooms, 3. commode devices rusted and with paint chipped away, and a commode loose and a chipped tank lid in two resident bathrooms (312, 309), and 4. Failure to ensure one resident room (415) out of 15 rooms was free from odors for three days (11/13/23, 11/14/23 and 11/15/23) of four days of the survey. Findings included: 1. Observations on the 400 hall and the 200 hall on 11/13/2023 at 10:00 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following qualifying mental health diagnosis for nine (Residents #41, #21, #12, #14, #13, #90, #108, #103, and #87) of nine residents sampled for PASRRs Findings included: 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Major depressive disorder, Vascular Dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of a level I PASRR for Resident #41 dated 04/16/21 showed qualifying diagnoses were not checked or indicated. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Major depressive disorder, Mood disorder, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty medication administration opportunities were observed and 23 errors were identified for two (Residents #84 and #89) of three residents observed. These errors constituted a 76.6% medication error rate. Findings Included: On 11/15/23 at 10:08 a.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN) was conducted for Resident #89. Staff I dispensed the following medications: -Amiodarone HCL 100 mg one tablet -Carbidopa/Levodopa 10 milligram (mg)/ 100 mg two tablets -Claritin 10 mg one tablet -Clopidogrel Bisulfate 75 mg one tablet -Tamsulosin 0.4 mg one tablet -Spironolactone 50 mg one tablet -Metoprolol 25 mg one tablet -Lasix 40 mg tablet one tablet -Eliquis 2.5 mg one tablet -Aspirin 81 mg DR one tablet On 11/15/23 at 10:36 a.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was conducted for Resident #84. Staff F dispensed the following medications: -Aspercream lidopatch one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 14 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly secure medications in two of three medication carts, and for two (Residents #42 and #11) of 27 sampled residents in accordance with professional standards Findings include: On 11/14/23 at 1:50 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #42. Observations in her room revealed small pink plastic vials and the large bottle of nasal spray on her bedside table. The resident stated the pink vials were normal saline vials that she had obtained while at another facility. The large nasal spray she liked to keep because it was easier for the nurses to add more medication and normal saline to the bottle. Resident #42 stated the nasal spray was a compound medication that was mixed by a pharmacist but the nurses filled up the bottle for her now. She was not quite sure of the medication that was added but stated, it really helps me. When asked when the last time the bottle was filled the resident stated, a few weeks ago. An interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and kitchen equipment were sanitary and with food free from cross contamination related to: 1. Two large sheet pans, which had seven to ten individualized plates of cakes on them, were shelved directly below a tray of defrosting raw red meat. The meat had dripped and pooled with blood on the plates of cakes; 2. One of One walk in freezer was observed with open food items exposed and frosted; 3. One of one reach in refrigerator/freezer unit was observed with open food items exposed and frosted; and 4. Staff from outside vendors not wearing proper hair and beard restraints when around food preparation and food cooking areas. Findings included: 1. On 11/13/2023 at 9:20 a.m. the facility's kitchen was toured with the Dietary Manager. The Dietary Manager revealed he had only been employed at the facility for approximately three months. Upon tour of the kitchen, there was a large walk-in refrigerator with the large metal door, which was closed. Once the door was opened and the unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #12) of 30 residents in hall 400, received care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to a change in condition (CIC). Findings included: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Change in A Resident's Condition of status, showed the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status e.g., Changes in level of care . 3. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, the nurse supervisor/charge nurse/designee will notify the resident's family or representative when: There is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status. 4. Regardless of the resident's current mental or physical condition, the nursing supervisor/charge nurse will inform the resident of any changes in his/her medical care or nursing treatments. 5. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #2) of six resident were free from accidental hazards as evident by the identification of a heating pad in use by the resident. Findings included: On 11/14/23 at 12.31 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #2 in her room, with a heating pad observed on her back while sitting in her electronic scooter. The resident stated she has had the pad for a while now. She stated she plugged it in herself. The heat just comes on. The resident could not verbalize how hot it was. She stated she liked it on her back. The resident stated her family member brought it to her. Upon further observation the heating pad had a digital display of 140 degrees Fahrenheit. On 11/14/23 at 12:35 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). She confirmed the resident used the heating pad often, but not all the time. She asked to use it daily, but not all hours of the day. The CNA said, I assist her with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability and storage of controlled medications in one of three medication carts inspected and in one of two medication storage rooms inspected. Findings included: An inspection of a medication cart on the 300 unit of the facility was conducted on 11/15/2023 at 12:41 PM with Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). An interview with Staff F, LPN was conducted prior to counting the controlled medications drawer in the medication cart. Staff F, LPN stated he administered several controlled medications during the morning medication pass but did not sign them out as being administered. Staff F, LPN stated it was difficult to sign the controlled medications out of the controlled substances record during the medication pass due to time constraints and the way my mind works is to pass the medications first and sign them out as administered by the end of the shift. Staff F, LPN stated the controlled medications should be signed out in the controlled substance record at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for four residents (#1, #4, #2, and #3) of seven sampled residents related to: 1. two staff members (G and H) failed to implement the care planned transfer intervention for one resident (#1) resulting in the resident being transferred incorrectly and Resident #1 obtained a humeral neck fracture, 2. One staff member (Staff L) failed to gain consent for a strait catheterization for one resident (#4), 3. the facility failed to prevent neglect by the lack of documentation of an assessment for a change in condition for one resident (#2), and 4. the facility failed to timely implement a new admission which resulted in one resident (#3) being transferred back to the hospital. Findings included: 1. A review of the facility's policy titled, Administrator/Employment Administration/Nursing Policies/Risk Management/Social Services/Staff Development-Abuse, Neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-21 · tag F0661 — patternEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an Interdisciplinary Discharge Summary included all the required elements and was in the medical record, and failed to ensure a Post Discharge Plan of Care was completed for two residents (#5, #7) with anticipated discharges of three sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Social Service-Discharge Process, undated, showed the facility will promote resident discharge from the facility based on the resident's preferences and abilities. Planned discharge will be conducted in an orderly, consistent and supportive manner. 4. A physician order will be obtained for discharge. 5. The Post-Discharge Plan of Care, form will be completed by the Social Services Director with the assistance of the Interdisciplinary Team and will be reviewed with the resident/designated representative on the day of discharge. A copy of the Post-Discharge Plan of Care will be given to the resident or designated representative. Th…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed ensure medical records were complete and accurate for one resident (#2) related to a change in condition which warranted emergency administration of medication and monitoring of three sampled residents. Findings included: Review of the admission Record showed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 07/12/2023. Record review showed the diagnoses included but was not limited to diabetes, emphysema, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of the Admission, Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], showed he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 or (moderately impaired). Section G - Functional Status showed he required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toileting and limited assistance for transfers. Record review of the July 2023 physician orders and July 2023 Medication Administration Record showed on 07/12/2023 to send Resident #2 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate monitoring of psychotropic medication use for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A review of Resident #1's Medical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of vascular dementia and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). A review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed an order, dated 09/22/2021, for Sertraline Hydrochloride (HCl) 100 milligrams (mg) given by gastric tube one time daily for depression. A review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders did not reveal an order for behavioral or side effect monitoring related to the use of antidepressant medications. A review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed a problem, revised on 12/21/2020, that Resident #1 was at risk for complications related to depression. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered and to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nurses, the facility failed to implement their Quality Assurance Program for three (Residents #8, #10, and #11) of three sampled residents, as evidence by failure to audit staff documentation of behaviors and side effects of psychotropic medications according to the plan of correction. Findings included: 1. Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to vascular dementia, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, adult failure to thrive, cancer of the bone and prostate, depression, acute kidney failure, and Cerebral Vascular Accident with hemiplegia. Observation on 11/30/21 at 10:07 a.m. revealed Resident #8 lying in a low bed. The resident was asleep with his mouth open. He had G-tube feeding infusing. The head of the bed was elevated. He had a blanket covering his hands. There were personal items in the room. The call light was within reach. Review of the Order Summary Report showed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to honor resident preferences for use of assistive devices for 1 (Resident #100) of 32 residents sampled for resident choices. Findings included: A review of Resident #100's Medical Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of morbid obesity, weakness, bilateral osteoarthritis of the knees, and congestive heart failure. An interview was conducted on 09/28/2021 at 09:23 a.m. with Resident #100. Resident #100 stated she would like to have bed rails on her bed to assist her with bed mobility, and to help her feel safer in her bed. Resident #100 also stated she had discussed her preference for bed rails with the facility staff, and they told her they would need to put an order in for them. Resident #100's bed was observed to not have side rails or assistive devices for bed mobility attached. A review of Resident #100's Physician's Orders did not reveal an order for bed rails or any type of assistive devices for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely response to concerns voiced by the resident council group. Findings included: A review of the resident council minutes revealed on 8/18/21 the group reported during the council meeting they received cold breakfast meals. A review of the Resident Council Concern Response Form, dated 8/18/21 indicated Breakfast meal cold. Continued review of the form revealed under the Corrective Action section: Will check trays to make sure is the correct temp. And will check with nurses to make sure trays are getting passed on time. A review of the Grievance Log for August 2021 revealed a grievance was logged by Resident #47 on 08/25/2021. The Nature /Type of Complaint was food. Review of the Grievance Report revealed resident stated while doing room rounds that his breakfast was late and cold. The Corrective Measures taken were informed all staff on hall to make sure resident is bedside before food off cart. During an interview with the Dietary Manager on 09/29/2021 beginning at 3:50 p.m. she reported she had been asked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL's) for 1 (#35) of 32 sampled residents related to nail care. Findings include: A review of the care plan for Resident #35 revealed a focus of ADL self-care performance deficit related to the resident's weakness, compromised cardiac status, dementia, lack of coordination, difficulty walking, and dysphagia. The interventions included: Personal Hygiene: He requires (Extensive) by (1) staff with personal hygiene Observations on 9/27/21 at 10:20 a.m. of Resident #35 revealed the resident lying on his back in his bed with both hands lying on his chest. It was noted the resident's spouse and son were both seated at his bedside. An attempted interview with the resident revealed that he was able to answer all questions independently. The resident's fingernails were observed to be long, and the resident was able to indicate he did not like his nails long and he would like them cut. The resident's spouse reported during the observation the resident never had his nails this long.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to act upon a pharmacy recommendation in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 sampled residents for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A review of Resident #1's Medical Record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of vascular dementia and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). A review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders revealed an order, dated 09/22/2021, for Sertraline Hydrochloride (HCl) 100 milligrams (mg) given by gastric tube one time daily for depression. A continued review of the Physician's Orders did not reveal an order for behavioral or side effect monitoring related to use of antidepressant medications. A review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed a problem, revised on 12/21/2020, that Resident #1 was at risk for complications related to depression. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered and to monitor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$80,408 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $68,770 — penalty dated 2025-10-01
- $11,638 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SUMMIT CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCOTT LAKE SNF OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 45% | since 08/02/2023 |
| DAVIS, ALAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 25% | since 06/01/2018 |
| MITCHELL, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 06/01/2018 |
| CH SUMMIT CARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| SEAM NY 2020 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/04/2023 |
| SK SUMMIT CARE II HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| SUMMIT CARE GROUP II OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| MCMANUS, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/03/2023 |
| SUMMIT CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2023 |
| NAULT, MARINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/05/2024 |
| MONTANA-HERNANDEZ, MAURICIO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/19/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $955K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.