Timberridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
9848 SW 110th St, Ocala, FL 34481 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (352) 854-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $119,636 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-19)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.0% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.7% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.2% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.3% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.2% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.1% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.7% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.4% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.9% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 2.13 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 457 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 175 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.9%CMS range 41.4–51.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 9.2–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 88.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 73.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.8–9.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 166.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
24 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medical neglect by failing to implement policies and procedures for neglect, resident change in condition or status, and resident transportation safety for facility operated vehicles when the facility transportation driver failed to notify the facility licensed medical staff of a resident change in condition. Resident #1, while being transported to the facility in the facility transport van after attending a physician appointment, stated she was out of oxygen, that she needed oxygen, was short of breath, and experiencing chest pain. The facility transportation driver pulled off the interstate, did not notify the facility licensed medical staff, asked Resident #1 if she wanted to return to the hospital/health facility, the resident declined, stating she was okay. The transportation driver did not notify the facility licensed medical staff of the resident declining medical care and services and continued to transport Resident #1 back to the facility. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, resident record reviews, and review of the policies and procedures, the facility administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident and to prevent medical neglect when the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for neglect, resident change in condition or status, and resident transportation safety for facility operated vehicles; the facility transportation driver failed to notify the facility licensed medical staff of a resident change in condition. Resident #1, while being transported to the facility in the facility transport van after attending a physician appointment, stated she was out of oxygen, that she needed oxygen, was short of breath, and experiencing chest pain. The facility transportation driver pulled off the interstate, did not notify the facility licensed medical staff, asked Resident #1 if she wanted to return to the hospital/health facility, the resident declined, stating she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, resident record reviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to utilize the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to investigate, develop and implement an effective performance improvement plan (PIP) when the facility transportation driver failed to notify the facility licensed medical staff of a resident change in condition. Resident #1, while being transported to the facility in the facility transport van after attending a physician appointment, stated she was out of oxygen, that she needed oxygen, was short of breath, and experiencing chest pain. The facility transportation driver pulled off the interstate, did not notify the facility licensed medical staff, asked Resident #1 if she wanted to return to the hospital/health facility, the resident declined, stating she was okay. The transportation driver did not notify the facility licensed medical staff of the resident declining medical care and services and continued to transport Resident #1 back to the facility. Resident #1 suffered cardiac arrest and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician ordered parameters were followed for 6 of 8 residents, Residents #15, #88, #23, #6, #94 and #179, reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's admission record documented diagnosis that include unspecified sequala of cerebral infarction (a stroke), major depressive disorder, recurrent moderate, depression unspecified, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of Resident #15's physician orders dated 7/22/2025 read, Losartan Potassium Oral Tablet 25 MG [milligrams] (Losartan Potassium) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for HTN [hypertension] HOLD FOR SBP [systolic blood pressure] BELOW 130. Review of Resident #15's medication administration record (MAR) for January 2026 documented Losartan was administered outside of physician ordered parameters at 0900 (9:00 AM) on 1/9/2026 for a blood pressure (B/P) of 116/53, on 1/10/2026 with a B/P of 123/49, on 1/11/2026 with a B/P of 116/64, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments for the residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for Level II PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR, Resident #2.Findings include:Review of Resident #2's admission record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (onset date of 1/12/2026), other specified anxiety disorders (onset date of 1/12/2026), and schizophrenia (onset date of 8/21/2024).Review of Resident #2's PASRR dated 7/22/2025 documented schizophrenia as the only mental illness or suspected mental illness under Section I. PASRR Screen Decision-Making.Review of Resident #2's psychiatry subsequent note dated 1/12/2026 read, Chief complaint: Depression, anxiety and insomnia. Diagnostic assessment and plan: Major depressive disorder recurrent moderate, other specified anxiety disorders, primary insomnia.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for residents who had language preferences for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for communication services, Resident #122.Findings include:During an interview (conducted in Spanish) on 2/2/2026 at 9:53 AM, Resident #122 stated she preferred to talk in Spanish and she had difficulty at times communicating with the staff and would prefer to speak in Spanish with the staff.During an observation on 2/3/2026 at 11:40 AM, Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was assisting Resident #122, who was speaking in Spanish. Staff H was answering with a couple of words in Spanish.During an observation on 2/3/2026 at 1:12 PM, Staff E, CNA, was accommodating Resident #122 in her bed and speaking to resident in Spanish.Review of Resident #122's care plan did not document a focus for communication for Resident #122's Spanish speaking preference.During an interview on 2/3/2026 at 11:33 AM, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Residents #22, #151, and #11.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 2/2/2026 at 2:22 PM, Resident #22 was being administered oxygen at 4 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #22's physician order dated 6/7/2025 read, Oxygen @ [at] 3L [liters]/Min [minute] every shift related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During an interview on 2/3/2026 at 11:55 AM, Staff N, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, We check on the amount of oxygen every time we have to take a resident on or off. I'm not sure why the oxygen was not at the right amount. We should follow the orders for what oxygen is running at. 2) During an observation on 2/2/2026 at 10:56 AM, Resident #151 was in bed with the head of bed elevated, with oxygen being administered at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #151's physician order dated 2/2/2026 read, Oxygen @ 2 liters/min via N/C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 1 of 8 residents, Resident #11, reviewed for documentation. Findings Include: Review of Resident #11's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2026, on 01/27/2026 for the scheduled 9:00 AM medication pass, the MAR was blank, no entries, for the physician ordered medications: Citalopram 0.5 tablet (10 mg) by mouth daily for depression, Fluticasone-Salmeterol one inhalation daily for COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), Tamsulosin HCl 0.4 mg one capsule by mouth daily, Thiamine HCl 100 mg one tablet by mouth daily, Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg one tablet by mouth twice daily, Gabapentin 100 mg one tablet by mouth twice daily, Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) 25 mg one tablet by mouth twice daily with parameters to hold if heart rate less than 60, and Sennosides 8.6 mg one capsule by mouth twice daily. The MAR did not include staff initials, documentation codes, or narrative notes to indicate whether these medications were administered,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection when failing to perform hand hygiene during medication administration and dining observations and failing to follow transmission-based precautions. Findings include: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 2/3/2026 beginning at 8:43 AM with Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) for Resident #120, Staff F did not perform hand hygiene, unlocked the medication cart, activated the computer and prepared the medications for the resident. Staff F, RN, entered the resident's room, did not perform hand hygiene, administered the medications, did not perform hand hygiene, and exited the resident's room. Staff F returned to the medication cart, did not perform hand hygiene, unlocked the medication cart, activated the computer and began preparing medications for Resident #141. Staff F entered the resident's room, did not perform hand hygiene, administered the medications, did not perform hand hygiene, and exited the resident's room. Staff F returned to the medication cart,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 resident, Resident #512, of 3 residents reviewed for insurance and payor source change was informed of co-pay obligations following a payor source change. Findings include: Review of Resident #512's admission record showed Resident #512 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture of sacrum, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing. Review of Resident #512's pre-admission insurance/managed care verification form, dated 4/5/2024, [name of the managed care insurance company] was documented as Resident #512's primary payor source. A co-pay of $125.00 a day for days 21-100 was indicated on the form. During an interview on 8/27/2024 and 10:15 AM, Resident #512 stated she was told by the Business Manager that her insurance wouldn't cover services after 20 days and the facility was going to switch her over to Medicare for coverage. Resident #512 reported she asked the Business Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered within parameters for 1 of 10 residents, Resident #24, failed to ensure blood pressure medication was administered within parameters for 3 of 10 residents, Residents #42, #110, and #127, reviewed for medication administration, failed to administer medications in accordance with professional standards of practice when administering crushed medications via gastrostomy tube for 1 of 1 resident, Resident #27, and failed to ensure dressing changes were completed for peripherally inserted central catheters for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #264. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #24's physician order dated 7/25/2024 read, Oxycodone HCI Tablet 10 mg [milligrams]. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for Pain Management > [greater than] 5. Review of Resident #24's Medication Administration Record for the month of August 2024 for Oxycodone HCI 10 mg documented the medication was given on 8/05/2024 at 5:51 PM for a pain level of 4, 8/08/2024 at 3:54 PM for pain level of 4,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided an assessment which accurately reflects the resident's status for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #159, reviewed for discharge status. Findings include: Review of the Social Service's progress note for Resident #159 dated 6/7/24 read, Pt [patient] was DC [discharged ] home today. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) signed and dated 6/10/24 at 12:55 PM read, Section A 12105, Discharge Status 04. Short - Term General Hospital (acute hospital). During an interview on August 27, 2024, at 1:50 PM the Lead MDS Coordinator stated, It [the MDS] should be coded for the resident going home, that was incorrect. During an interview on August 27, 2024, at 1:55 PM the Director of Nursing stated, My expectation is they [the MDS] should have been coded correctly. Review of the policy and procedure titled Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) read, Intent: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to the following procedures related to the proper documentation and utilization of a residents Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 residents, Resident #136, reviewed for nutrition was offered a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician and recommended by the Registered Dietician. Findings include: Review of Resident #136's admission record showed Resident #136 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified cirrhosis of liver, end stage renal disease, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #136's physician's orders read Liberal Renal diet Regular texture. Thin consistency. Add double protein portions. Add eggs w/ [with] breakfast when available. Review of Resident #136's care plan, revised on 4/1/2024, read [Resident #136's Name] has a nutritional problem r/t [related to] non-compliance with dialysis, CHF [congestive heart failure], ESRD [end stage renal disease], anemia in chronic disease, chronic viral Hepatitis C, therapeutic diet, abnormal nutrition related labs, fluid restriction, drug-nutrient interactions. Resident #136's care plan documented nutritional interventions that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 11 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately document blood pressure medication administration and vital signs for 2 of 10 residents, Residents #42 and #110 reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #42's physician order dated 7/24/2024 read, Valsartan Oral Tablet 80 mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN [hypertension] hold if SBP [systolic blood pressure] is less than 110 or HR [heart rate] less than 60. Review of Resident #42 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of August 2024 for Valsartan 80 mg at 9:00 AM documented on 8/7/2024 coded 9 other/see progress note, on 8/12/2024 vital signs documented NA [not applicable], and on 8/20/2024 through 8/22/2024 coded 5 hold/ see progress notes. Review of Resident #42's progress notes did not provide documentation for the coded 9 and 5 entries on the MAR for 8/7/2024, and 8/20/2024 through 8/22/2024. During an interview on 8/29/2024 at 11:48 AM the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, In reviewing [Resident #42's name] medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain enhance barrier precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection during direct catheter care and intravenous medication administration and failed to prevent the possible spread of infection in failing to provide intravenous dressing change for peripherally inserted central catheter line (PICC). Findings Include: 1) During an observation on 8/26/2024 at 9:40 AM Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), entered Resident #127's room without gowning and inspected the urinary catheter drainage bag to see if it was leaking. Staff C exited Resident #127's room and came back with towels to place on the wet floor. Staff C without wearing a gown emptied the urinary catheter drainage bag. During an observation on 8/26/2024 at 10:02 AM Staff C, CNA was observed to be providing incontinent care for Resident #127, who has an indwelling urinary catheter, without wearing a gown. During an interview on 8/29/2024 at 8:41 AM with Staff C, CNA, stated, I know I messed up. I should have gowned when I was emptying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representative when there was a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care, Resident #2. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 1/13/2023 reads, Mupirocin External Ointment 2% (Mupirocin) apply to g-tube [gastrostomy tube] site topically every shift for infected g-tube site applied to g-tube site after cleaning water and soap and pat dry then applied t-sponge. Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 2/27/2023 reads, Triple Antibiotic External Ointment (Neomycin-Bacitracin-Polymyxin) apply to g-tube site topically three times a day for infection of site with foam dressing. Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 2/27/2023 reads, Contact isolation precautions x [times] 10 days for ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) e-coli [Escherichia Coli] around G-tube every shift for infection control and resolution for 10 days. Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 2/27/2023 reads, Invanz Injection Solution Reconstituted 1 GM [gram] (Ertapenem…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for diabetes, Resident #1. Finding include: Review of Resident #1's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, chronic pulmonary edema, unspecified glaucoma, and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 7/23/2023 reads, Low Concentrated Sweets/NAS (No Added Salt) diet. Regular texture, thin consistency. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2023 reads, Basaglar KwikPen 100 Unit/ML Solution pen-injector. Inject 20 unit subcutaneously at bedtime related to type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2023 reads, Basaglar KwikPen 100 Unit/ML Solution pen-injector. Inject 60 unit subcutaneously one time a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were accurate for blood sugar levels for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for diabetes, Resident #1. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, chronic pulmonary edema, unspecified glaucoma, and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2023 reads, Basaglar KwikPen 100 Unit/ML Solution pen-injector. Inject 20 unit subcutaneously at bedtime related to type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2023 reads, Basaglar KwikPen 100 Unit/ML Solution pen-injector. Inject 60 unit subcutaneously one time a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record for October 2023 revealed no blood sugar level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #309's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including essential (primary) hypertension, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #309's physician order dated 4/5/2023 reads. Oxygen @ [at] 2 L/Min [liters/minute] via NC [nasal cannula] CONT [continuous] every shift. During an observation on 4/24/2023 at 11:16 AM, Resident #309 was resting in bed and was being administered oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. During an observation on 4/25/2023 at 12:52 PM, Resident #309 was in bed and was being administered oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. During an interview on 4/25/2023 at 12:54 PM, Staff G, License Practical Nurse (LPN), verified the oxygen was being administered at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Staff G stated, The orders are for 2 liters. I do not know why it is at 3. I normally check the oxygen rate when I give morning medications. I did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: 1. During an observation of Medication Cart #1-200 Hall on [DATE] at 7:40 AM with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), there was one Basaglar Inj. (injectable) open insulin pen for Resident #90, that was not labeled with an open date or date of expiration and one Lantus Solostar 100 unit/ml (milliliters) insulin pen for Resident #119, that was open and was not labeled with an open date or date of expiration. During an observation of Medication Cart #2-200 Hall on [DATE] at 7:50 AM with Staff B, License Practical Nurse (LPN), there was one open Novolin R Flex pen 100 unit/ml for Resident #11 that was opened and was not labeled with an open date or expiration date, one Basaglar Inj. 100 unit pen for Resident #5 that was opened and was not labeled with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written bed-hold notice that included all required information was provided to the resident and their representative for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfers, Resident #67. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #67 revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent admission date of 3/18/2023. Review of the einteract report dated 4/19/2023 for Resident #68 read, Resident not responding as usual face drooping to right side. Hard to arouse without stimulation. Send to ER [Emergency Room] for evaluation. Review of Resident #67's Nursing Home to Hospital Transfer Form dated 4/19/2023 documented the resident was transferred to the hospital due to being unresponsive. Further review of the record revealed no documentation indicating that the facility had provided the resident and the resident representative with a written bed-hold notice. During an interview on 4/26/2023 at 1:56 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment of the resident's status for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #157. Findings include: Review of Resident #157's electronic record showed Resident #157 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/29/23. Review of Resident #157's nursing progress note dated 1/29/23 read, Patient was D/C [discharged ] home with home health . Patient left with grandson. Review of Resident #157's Minimum Data Set Assessment Discharge Return Not Anticipated dated 1/29/23 documented the resident was discharged to an acute hospital. During an interview on 4/26/23 at 12:20 PM, Staff R, MDS (Minimum Data Set) Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed Resident #157's Discharge MDS documented him as being discharged to an acute hospital; he (the resident) was discharged home with family.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during wound care to prevent the possible spread of infection for 1 of 2 residents observed for wound care, Resident #16. Findings include: During an observation on 4/26/2023 at 8:00 AM, Resident #16 was lying in bed and had gauze wraps dated 4/25/2023 to the lower extremities with dried red colored stains on the gauze. Review of Resident #19's physician order dated 4/26/2023 reads, Cleanse bilateral lower extremities with normal saline, pat dry, apply Xeroform to abrasions on bilateral lower extremities, cover with ABD [abdominal] pads & secure with kerlix cling wrap once daily and as needed for soiling everyday shift. During an observation on 4/26/2023 at 10:08 AM, Staff G, License Practical Nurse (LPN), entered Resident #16's room, performed hand hygiene and donned gloves. The bedside table had wound care supplies on a barrier. Staff G placed the resident's legs on a barrier on the bed. Staff G cleansed the left lower extremity with gauze and normal saline and placed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-04-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted daily. (Photographic evidence obtained) Findings include: During an observation on 4/24/2023 at 9:04 AM, the posted nurse staffing information readily accessible to residents and visitors was dated 4/13/2023. During an observation on 4/25/2023 at 1:38 PM, the posted nurse staffing information readily accessible to residents and visitors was dated 4/24/2023. During an interview on 4/26/2023 at 3:18 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, My expectation is that staffing hours are to be posted daily. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Nursing - Nurse Staffing Information last reviewed on 12/20/2022 read, Policy: (1) Data Requirements. The facility must post the following information on a daily basis: (iii) The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: (A) Registered nurses. (B) Licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses (as defined under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$119,636 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $119,636 — penalty dated 2024-01-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SUMMIT CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIMBERRIDGE OPERATIONS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/30/2019 |
| CH TIMBERRIDGE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/30/2019 |
| ED FLORIDA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/30/2019 |
| KF FLORIDA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/30/2019 |
| SE FLORIDA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/30/2019 |
| SEAM TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/30/2019 |
| SYLVAN SUNSHINE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/30/2019 |
| DREBIN, EZRIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/30/2019 |
| SCHLESINGER, ERNEST | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/30/2019 |
| SOEHNER, RICHARD | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| KLEIN, SOLOMON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/30/2019 |
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105717. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.