Palatka Center For Rehabilitation And Healing
110 Kay Larkin Dr, Palatka, FL 32177 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (386) 325-0173 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.9% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.8% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.6% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.3% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.2% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.2% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 9.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.00 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 1.15 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 320 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 193 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 52% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.2%CMS range 53.0–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.7–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 5.3–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 150.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-16 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were complete and accurate for 8 of 15 residents, Residents #2, #3, #8, #9, #112, #73, #139, and #153, reviewed Minimum Data Set assessments.Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 4/2/2026 read, Olanzapine Oral Tablet 5 MG [Milligram] (Olanzapine) give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for schizophrenia. Review of Resident #2 Medication Administration Record for the month of April 2026 documented the resident was administered Olanzapine for schizophrenia for the look back period of 4/2/2026 through 4/8/2026. Review of Resident #2's MDS titled Medicare 5 Day dated 4/8/2026, under Section I – Active Diagnoses, schizophrenia was not documented. During an interview on 7/15/2026 at 11:03 AM the MDS Registered Nurse (RN) Lead stated, [Resident #2's name] assessment is missing the diagnosis of schizophrenia. 2) Review of Resident #8 physician order dated 6/23/2026 read,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure wound care dressing changes were provided per physicians' orders for 4 of 7 residents, Resident #49, #58, #132, and #161 reviewed for skin conditions and failed to apply compression stockings per they physician order for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #150 reviewed for edema.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 7/13/2026 at 9:56 AM Resident #161 was lying in bed. There was a wound dressing on the resident's left ankle. The wound dressing was dated 7/11. [photographic evidence obtained] During an observation on 7/14/2026 at 9:00 AM Resident #161 was lying in bed. The resident had a wound dressing to the left ankle that was dated 7/11/2026. During an interview on 7/14/2026 at 9:00 AM Resident #161, stated, They have not changed my dressing, and I need them to change it. Review of Resident #161's physician order dated 7/7/2026 read, Apply betadine to left ankle and cover wth [sic] Tegaderm every day shift. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored when unattended for 2 of 4 hallways.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 7/13/2026 at 9:31 AM Resident #53 was sitting in her room. On top of the resident's nightstand there was a medication cup with a white cream. During an interview on 7/13/2026 at 9:31 AM Resident #53 stated, The nurses give me that cream so I can apply it to my hands and feet it has lidocaine. I use it for my neuropathy pain. During an interview on 7/13/2026 at 1:23 PM Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, [Resident #53's name] is not able to self-administer medication. Normally she will rub the cream herself, but the nurse has to be there with her. 2) During an observation on 7/13/2026 at 10:20 AM Resident #8 was lying in bed with eyes closed. There was an antibiotic ointment on top of the cabinet in the room. During an interview on 7/13/2026 at 1:25 PM Staff J, Unit Manger Registered Nurse (RN) stated, [Resident #8's name] is not able to self-administer the ointment, it is for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure residents' records were complete and accurate for 5 of 7 residents, Residents #49, #58, #132, #161, and #150, reviewed for documentation. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 7/13/2026 at 9:56 AM Resident #161 had a wound dressing on the resident's left ankle. The wound dressing was dated 7/11. [Photographic evidence obtained] During an observation on 7/14/2026 at 9:00 AM Resident #161 had a wound dressing on the resident's left ankle. The wound dressing was dated 7/11. During an interview on 7/14/2026 at 9:00 AM Resident #161, stated, They have not changed my dressing and I need them to change it. Review of Resident #161's physician order dated 7/7/2026 read, Apply betadine to left ankle and cover wth {sic} tegaderm every day shift. Review of Resident Treatment Record for the month of July for dressing changes of to the left ankle documented dressing changes were completed on 7/12/2026, 7/13/2026, and 7/14/2026. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and Level II PASRR were completed when a mental illness was identified for 2 of 3 residents, Resident #2 and #136, review for PASRR screening.Findings include:1) Review of Resident #2's State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 4/2/2026 read, Section I: PASSR Screen Decision-Making. A. MI [Mental Illness] or Suspected MI: Schizophrenia and substance abuse. Section III: PASSR Screen Provisional admission or Hospital Discharge Exemption: Individual may be admitted to an Nursing Facility (check one of the following): Hospital Discharge Exemption. The individual is being admitted under 30 day discharge exemption. If the individual's stay is anticipated to exceed 30 days, the NF must notify the Level I screener on the 25th day of stay and the Level II evaluation must be completed no later than the 40th day of admission on or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #139, reviewed for behavioral management.Findings include:Review of Resident #139's [Name of psychiatric provider] note dated 4/9/2026 read, Chief Complaint: Mood disorder, PTSD [Post Traumatic Stress Disorder], depression, anxiety, TD [Tardive dyskinesia] and opioid abuse. Diagnoses Rationale and Justifications: PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder): The history suggests that this patient has suffered from significant trauma resulting in nightmares, flashbacks, and hypervigilance in the past. The symptoms have caused significant distress and functional impairment to the patient. The symptoms have lasted for more than one month and have occurred without any substance use or organic brain pathology.Review of Resident #139's [Name of psychiatric provider] note dated 7/9/2026 read, Chief Complaint: Mood disorder, PTSD, depression, anxiety, TD and opioid abuse. Diagnoses Rationale and Justifications: PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder): The history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the flushing of a gastric tube after the administration of a bolus feeding for 1of 4 residents, Resident #136, reviewed for enteral tube management.Findings include:During an observation on 7/15/2026 at 12:04 PM Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered Resident #136's room. Staff G donned gloves but did not don a gown. Staff G administered 50 ml [milliliters] of water to flush Resident #136's gastric tube followed by 250 ml of Glucerna 1.5. Staff G finished the administration of the bolus feeding and did not flush the gastric tube after administering the bolus feed.During an interview on 7/15/2026 at 12:12 PM Staff G, LPN stated, Usually I only flush before to clean out the gastric tube not after. The order did not say to flush after.Review of Resident #136's physician orders dated 7/8/2026 read, Enteral Feed Order every 8 hours Enteral: Bolus Feeding - Glucerna 1.5 per G-TUBE [gastrostomy tube] via bolus. 250 mL every 8hrs, FLUSH with 50ML of H20 [water] BEFORE AND AFTER EVERY BOLUS to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care for oxygen administration and/or humidification per physician orders for 2 of 6, Resident #48 and #147, and failed to obtain a physician order for the use of a continuous positive airway pressure machine for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #84, reviewed for respiratory services.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 07/13/2026 at 9:28 AM Resident #48 was lying in bed oxygen was administered at 4 liters with humification attached. During an observation on 7/14/2026 at 9:01 AM Resident #48 was lying in bed with eyes closed oxygen was administered via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute with humidification. [Photographic evidence obtained] Review of Resident #48 physician order dated 6/15/2026 read, Oxygen @ 4 L/Min [at 4 liters per minute] continuous inhalation via NC [nasal cannula] every shift. There was no order documented in the record for the use of humidification. During an interview on 7/15/2026 at 9:13 AM Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, [Resident #48's name]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed related to the pharmacy Psychoactive Medication Use Recommendations for the monthly drug regimen review for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #49, reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include: Review of the Psychoactive Medication Use Recommendations document for Resident #49 dated 6/23/2026 read, Currently receiving Trazodone which can increase risk of drowsiness and falls. Per clinical record, with recent falls. Please evaluate, consider tapering dose or implementing alternative treatment, if necessary. The physician response was documented as Agree; Will do; D/ C [discontinue]. Review of Resident #49's physician orders dated 6/22/2026 read, Trazodone HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG [milligrams] (Trazodone HCl): Give 25 mg by mouth at bedtime related to major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate (F33.1) Review of Resident #49's MAR (Medication Administration Record) from 6/23/2026 through 7/15/2026 documented that Trazadone was administered daily at bedtime per the initialing of the MAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure laboratory specimens as ordered by the physician were collected for 2 of 4 residents, Resident #3 and #48, reviewed for laboratory services.Findings include: Review of Resident #48's physician order dated 7/7/2026 read, Ferritin, Folate, Iron, TIBC [Total Iron-Binding Capacity], and % SAT [saturation] waiting to be sent one time only related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation. Review of Resident #48's medical record for lab results the record did not contain lab results for the physician ordered labs dated 7/7/2026. During an interview on 7/16/2026 at 9:07 AM the Director of Nursing stated, [Resident #48's name] labs did not get drawn. The facility did not do a requisition form. Review of Resident #3's physician's order dated 06/30/2026 read, Urinalysis w/Micro [with microscopic], Reflx {sic} to Urine Culture - SCHEDULED 6/30/2026; Auto-Send 6/30/2026 12:00 AM one time only. Review of Resident #3's medical record for labs results the record did not contain lab results for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection during wound care and the administration of gastrointestinal tube feeding. Findings include: 1) During an observation of wound care on 07/15/2026 at 2:30 PM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) performed hand hygiene, and donned a gown and clean gloves. The LPN set up wound care supplies on a sheet of tin foil and placed supplies on Resident #6's bedside table, doffed the gloves, performed hand hygiene, and applied clean gloves. The LPN cleansed the resident's coccyx wound with wound cleanser, patted the area dry with gauze, did not remove the soiled gloves, did not perform hand hygiene, or don clean gloves, and packed the wound with mupirocin, Santyl, and calcium alginate, placed a silicone foam dressing over the wound, then completed hand hygiene. During an interview on 07/15/2026 at 2:45 PM, Staff A, LPN stated that she was not aware that she needed to wash her hands and change her gloves between cleaning the wound and applying the new wound dressings. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents' health record showed the residents either received the pneumococcal immunization for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #43 reviewed for immunization.Findings include:Review of Resident #43's vaccination records showed a pneumococcal immunization consent signed on 8/25/2025 accepting to receive the pneumococcal vaccine.Review of Resident #43's immunization report did not document Resident #43 was administered a pneumococcal vaccine.During an interview on 7/16/2026 at 1:21 PM the Director of Nursing stated, [Resident #43's name] did not receive the pneumococcal vaccination.Review of the policy and procedure titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine with a last review date of 1/20/2026 read, Policy Statement. All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 4. Pneumococcal vaccines will be administered to residents (unless medically contraindicated, already given, or refused) per our facility's physician-approved pneumococcal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-27 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) dressing changes were performed in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #2, reviewed for intravenous therapy.Findings include:During an observation on 02/27/2026 at 10:22 AM of Resident #2, the resident had a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line inserted into the right upper arm. The PICC line was covered with a transparent dressing dated 2/11.During an interview on 02/27/2026 at 10:25 AM, Staff A, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, It says 2/11 [the date on the PICC line dressing]. They are supposed to be changed weekly, I believe on Saturdays.During an interview on 02/27/2026 at 10:37 AM, Staff C, LPN stated, I think the RN [Registered Nurse] supervisor changes all the PICC line dressings. She works Monday through Friday, but she's not here today.During an interview on 02/27/2026 at 10:41 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, The PICC dressings should be changed every week, it is the responsibility of the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurately documented for wound care treatments 1 of 5 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for wound care. Findings includedReview of Resident #1's physician order dated 01/17/2026 read, WOUND CARE: Cleanse abdominal staples with NSS [normal saline solution], pat dry, apply dry dressing every day shift. End date 01/26/2026.Review of Resident #1's Treatment Administration Record, the record did not contain documentation wound care was completed as ordered by the physician for the abdominal wound on 01/18/2026, 01/19/2026, or 1/23/2026.During an interview on 02/27/2026 at 12:40 PM, Staff A, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, I changed [Resident #1's name]'s abdominal dressing every time I took care of her, so I must have just forgotten to document that I changed it on January 18th and 23rd.During an interview on 02/27/2026 at 1:13 PM, Staff B, LPN stated, I cannot recall whether I changed [Resident #1's name]'s dressing on January 19th or not.Review of the policy and procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection for not implementing enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #2, reviewed for intravenous therapy care.Findings included:During an observation on 02/27/2026 at 10:32 AM, Staff A, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed changing Resident #2's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line dressing. The LPN was not wearing a gown.During an interview on 02/27/2026 at 10:43 AM the Director of Nursing stated, [Resident #2's name] should be on enhanced barrier precautions due to her IV (intravenous) and her wound. [Staff A's name] should have worn a gown. [Resident #2's name] doesn't have an order for enhanced barrier precautions.During an interview on 02/27/2026 at 10:48 AM, Staff A, LPN stated, I didn't think I needed to wear a gown to change a PICC line dressing.Review of Resident #2's care plan dated 02/02/2026 read, [Resident #2's name] is on IV Antibiotic Medications r/t [related to] Wound Infection. Interventions: Provide enhanced barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a rationale when actions were not taken for pharmacy recommendations for 3 (Resident #7, #84, and #99) of 5 residents review for unnecessary medication. Findings include: 1)Review of Resident #7 Drug Regimen Review dated 7/10/2024 read, Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations. Currently receiving Oxybutynin (Ditropan) three times daily for urinary incontinence. Oxybutynin (Ditropan) can increase risk of dizziness and falls. Per clinical record, with recent falls. Periodic discontinuation recommended to determine current need and minimize resistance to the drug. Please evaluate, consider trail taper to two times daily with eventual discontinue, if appropriate . Physician Response: Disagree with no rationale included. Review of Resident #7 Drug Regimen Review dated 11/27/2024 read, Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations. Currently with active order for Hydrocodone/APAP which can increase risk of falls with recent documented falls per clinical record. Please evaluate possible casual relationship, Consider tapering dose or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect and were free from physical restraint use when 1 resident had a splint on one hand and a nonskid sock covering the other hand for 1 resident (Resident #116) of 2 residents observed for positioning and mobility. Findings include: Review of the admission record documented that Resident #116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including hemiplegia [the complete loss of movement of one side of the body] and hemiparesis [weakness and partial loss of movement of one side of the body] following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side [a stroke affecting the right side of the body],cognitive communication deficit[ difficulty communicating], and contracture, left hand [ a tightening of muscles and ligaments that prevents normal movement of the affected part]. During an observation on 02/17/2025 at 1:53 PM, Resident #116 was wearing a splint on her left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of minimum data set assessments for 1 (Resident #4) of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory services and 1 (Resident #143) of 5 reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1)Resident #4 physician order dated 7/5/2024 read, Oxygen @ 3 L/Min (at 3 liters per minute) continuous inhalation via nc (nasal cannula) every shift for sob (shortness of breath). Review of Resident #4 Minimum Data Set (MDS) titled Quarterly dated 12/24/2024 read, Section O Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs: Oxygen therapy was coded No. Review of Resident #4 admission Record resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, type 2 diabetes, and acute posthemorrhagic anemia. During an interview on 2/19/2025 at 3:40 PM with the Regional MDS Consultant stated, [Resident #4's MDS appears to need to be corrected. I will modify Section O and correct the oxygen section.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #44) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI) , and for 1 resident (Resident #21) of 4 residents reviewed for mood and behaviors. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record documented diagnoses that included depression. Review of Resident #21's physician progress note dated 1/31/2025 read, Chief Complaint: Depression, dementia and insomnia. Reason for Today's Encounter: Today, I saw the patient for medication management as patient has active psychiatric diagnosis, is on psych( psychiatric) meds(medications), is in the facility setting, and the last psychiatric visit was 4 or more weeks ago and as it was reported to me that patient is unstable requiring psychiatric assessment. History of Present Illness: This is a [AGE] year old patient with a past psychiatric history of depression, dementia and insomnia. Review of Resident #21's progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer blood pressure medication following parameters for 2 (Resident #103 and 143) out of 8 residents reviewed for medication administration and failed to follow professional standards of practice during medication administration to 1 resident, Resident #456. Findings include: 1.) Review of Resident #103 physician order dated 9/7/2023 read, Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG (milligram) (Metoprolol Tartrate) Give 12.5 mg by mouth two times a day for hypertension hold for SBP<120 (systolic blood pressure less than 120). Review of Resident #103's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of January 2025 documented Metoprolol Tartrate 12.5 mg was given at 0900 [9:00 AM] on 1/16/2025 with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 108, 1/18/2025 with a systolic blood pressure of 118, 1/19/2025 with a SBP of 115, 1/21/2025 with a SBP of 114, 1/30/2025 with a SBP of 118 and at 2100 [ 9:00 PM] on 1/5/2025 with a SBP of 113, 1/15/2025 with a SBP of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that oxygen was administered consistent with professional standards of practice for two (Resident #8 and Resident #125) of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory care . Findings include: 1.) During an observation on 2/17/2025 at 10:15 AM, Resident #8 was sleeping in their bed. She was observed with a nasal cannula in her nose attached to an oxygen concentrator running at 3 liters per minute (LPM). During an observation on 2/18/2025 at 12:51 PM, Resident #8 was observed sitting at the nurse's station in her wheelchair without her oxygen therapy of 2 LPM of continuous flow via a nasal cannula. During an observation on 2/19/2025 at 8:03 AM, Resident #8 was observed sleeping in her bed. She was observed with a nasal cannula in her nose attached to an oxygen concentrator running at 3 LPM. During an interview on 02/18/25 1:36 PM with the Director of Nursing, she stated that her expectations are that if a resident has an order for continuous oxygen that the resident should be kept on the prescribed flow of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' medications regimens were free of unnecessary antibiotic use based on adequate indications to reduce the risk of the developement of antibiotic resistant organisms for 1 (Resident #134) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #134's admission record documented diagnoses that included ,but were not limited to chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe). Review of Resident #134's nursing progress notes Change in Condition form dated 1/6/2025 at 2:24 PM, read, Other change in condition: . Outcomes of Physical Assessment: Positive findings reported on the resident/patient evaluation for this change in condition were: .GU/Urine Status Evaluation: Painful urination .Primary Care Provider Feedback: Primary Care Provider responded with the following feedback: A. Recommendations: Bactrim DS one tab(tablet) po(by mouth) bid ( two times a day) x7days. Review of Resident #134's Physician orders dated 1/6/2025 at 2:29 PM read, Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Tablet 800-160…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice when unsecured medications were observed in resident rooms for 1 out of 4 units reviewed for unattended medication. Finding include: 1)During an observation on 2/17/2025 at 10:17 AM Resident # 65 was lying in bed and on top of her bedside table there was a bottle of Fluticasone Propionate Lotion 0.05%. (photographic evidence obtained) During an interview on 2/17/2025 at 10:17 AM Resident #65 stated, I have the nurse apply the lotion to my back when it is itchy. Review of Resident #65 physician orders did not reveal a medication self-administration order. Review of Resident #65 care plan did not document a focus for medication self-administration. During an observation on 2/17/2025 at 10:21 AM Resident #80 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room. There was a circular white tablet in a plastic medication cup on top of the bedside table. (photographic evidence obtained) During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infection by failing to perform hand hygiene during medication administration for 4 (Residents #96 and #407) of 6 residents observed for medication administration, and failed to follow acceptable standards of care for storage of respiratory care equipment for 2 ( Resident #47 and Resident #143) of 6 residents reviewed for Respiratory care. Findings include: During an observation on 2/19/25 at 8:25 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed administering a medication intravenously to Resident #96 without performing hand hygiene before donning gloves and administering the medication or after removing her gown and gloves. Staff A, RN was observed returning to the medication cart to administer another residents medications. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 8:34 AM, Staff A, RN stated, I didn't wash my hands. During an observation on 2/19/25 at 8:37 AM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship protocol when it failed to monitor the use of antibiotics to reduce the risk of development of antibiotic resistance for 1 (Resident # 134) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. Findings include: Review of Resident #134's admission record documented diagnoses that included ,but were not limited to chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe). Review of Resident #134's nursing progress notes Change in Condition form dated 1/6/2025 at 2:24 PM, read, Other change in condition: . Outcomes of Physical Assessment: Positive findings reported on the resident/patient evaluation for this change in condition were: .GU/Urine Status Evaluation: Painful urination .Primary Care Provider Feedback: Primary Care Provider responded with the following feedback: A. Recommendations: Bactrim DS one tab(tablet) po(by mouth) bid ( two times a day) x7days. Review of Resident #134's Physician orders dated 1/6/2025 at 2:29 PM read, Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Tablet 800-160 MG: Give 1 tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practice standards during incontinence care for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence care (Residents #5 and #6). Findings include: 1. Review of the admission record documented that Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses displaced intertrochanteric facture of the left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with (acute) exacerbation, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery heart disease) without angina pectoris (chest pain), primary generalized osteoarthritis and essential primary hypertension. During an observation on 11/7/2024 at 10:40 AM, Resident #5 was lying in bed with the television on. There were incontinence briefs on Resident #5's dresser. During an interview on 11/7/2024 at 10:40 AM, Resident #5 stated, I am incontinent and can't get up by myself.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in 1 of 2 wings in the facility. Findings include: During an observation while conducting the facility tour on 8/12/2024 beginning at 10:00 AM, there were one blanket on the floor near the window and one plastic cup under the resident's bedside table in Resident #10's room, one medication cup on the floor in Resident #6's room, one plastic cup on the floor and one blue glove on the floor in the bathroom in Resident #7 and Resident #8's room, dried brown substance in the front of the toilet from the seat of the toilet down to the floor and one towel under sink on the floor in Resident #9's room. During an interview on 8/12/2024 at 10:19 AM, Staff B, Housekeeper, confirmed the items observed on the floor and stated, I work 7 AM to 3 PM. There is no 3 PM -11 PM or 11 PM- 7 AM shifts for housekeeping. During an interview on 8/12/2024 at approximately 10:25 AM, Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), confirmed the items observed on the floor and stated, Housekeepers work…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Residents #5. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's admission record revealed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dislocation of left hip, non-pressure chronic ulcer of right thigh, stage 2 pressure ulcer of sacral region, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, contracture of right and left hips and knees, and Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection (with onset date of 6/24/2024). Review of Resident #5's care plan with the last review date of 7/17/2024 showed it read, Focus: Falls- The resident is at risk for falls r/t [related to] impaired functional mobility, sleeps on edge of bed, incontinence, bilateral knee contractures . Interventions: 2/19/24: Fall Mats. During an observation on 8/12/2024 at 11:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment while providing direct care to the residents on contact precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: Review of Resident #5's admission record revealed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dislocation of left hip, non-pressure chronic ulcer of right thigh, stage 2 pressure ulcer of sacral region, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, contracture of right and left hips and knees, and Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection (with onset date of 6/24/2024). Review of Resident #5's physician order dated 6/27/2024 showed it read, Contact isolation related to MRSA [Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus], All services to be provided in patient room secondary to contact isolation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability or related condition were referred to the appropriate state designated authority for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for mood and behaviors, Residents #53, #95, #142. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #142's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and was diagnosed with brief psychotic disorder on 9/27/2022. Review of Resident #142's physician order dated 7/14/2023 reads, Valproic Acid (Depakote)Sent to lab 7/14/2023 1:41 AM ET [Eastern Time] one time only related to autistic disorder, brief psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #142's physician order dated 8/30/2023 reads, Depakote Oral Tablet Delayed Release (Divalproex Sodium) give 750 mg [milligram] by mouth two times a day for mood disorder. Review of State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 8/19/2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Residents #123, #231, #104 and #142. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/30/2023 at 12:36 PM, Resident #123's oxygen (O2) tubing had no date. The respiratory plastic bag was on top of the O2 condenser located at the bedside, which was dated 9/13/2023 (photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 10/31/2023 at 3:47 PM, Resident #123's respiratory plastic bag was dated 9/13/2023. There was no date on the oxygen tubing (photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 10/31/2023 at 3:47 PM, Resident #123 stated, I need my oxygen on all the time. I get very winded without having it on. During an interview on 11/1/2023 at approximately 1:00 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, I don't have any words. Review of Resident #123's physician order dated 8/1/2023 reads, Oxygen @ [at] 2 L/Min [Liters/Minute] via NC [nasal cannula]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #147's physician order dated 9/12/2022 reads, Liberal Renal diet, Regular Texture, Thin consistency. Review of Resident #147's physician order dated 9/12/2023 reads, Dialysis: Vitals Signs Pre Dialysis every day shift every Mon, Wed, Fri for Dialysis. Review of Resident #147's physician order dated 9/12/2023 reads, Dialysis: Vitals Signs Post Dialysis every evening shift every Mon [Monday], Wed [Wednesday], Fri [Friday] for Dialysis. Review of Resident #147's physician order dated 9/12/2022 reads, Dialysis: AV Fistula- Monitor for Signs & Symptoms of Infection every shift. Assess site for any change in skin condition. Report any noted redness, edema, or increased skin temperature to MD every shift. Review of Resident #147's Medication Administration Record for October 2023 for vital signs post dialysis revealed no recording on 10/2/2023,10/6/2023, 10/9/2023, 10/11/2023, 10/13/2023, 10/16/2023, 10/20/2023, and 10/30/2023. Review of Resident #147's Medication Administration Record for October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident choices or preferences were followed. Findings include: Review of the menu posted on 10/30/2023 at 9:25 AM outside of the café dining room showed the breakfast menu included egg, sausage, cheese sandwich, and English muffin. During an observation on 10/30/2023 at 9:25 AM in the café dining room, the residents were served scrambled eggs, toast, and hot cereal. During an interview on 10/31/2023 at 12:03 PM, Resident #33 [Resident Council President] stated, The posted menus are not what we receive on numerous occasions and that food preferences are not honored nor are we given a select menu. The dietary manager stated the budget did not always allow them to have meats for breakfast. The facility has been out of eggs on several occasions, and we are served grits, cheese, and toast. During an interview on 10/31/2023 at 12:10 PM, Resident #17 stated, The kitchen runs out of the regular meal before all residents get served and the remaining residents get something totally different on numerous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #20's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #20's medical records revealed the resident had a fall with injury on 10/3/2023. Resident #20 returned to the facility following a temporary absence for hospitalization on 10/9/2023 with a new diagnosis of fracture of left radius. Review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set showed the resident's next assessment reference date of 10/16/2023 that was 18 days overdue. During an interview on 11/3/2023 at approximately 7:45 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, My expectation is that upon return to the facility, the assessment should be completed within 14 days. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) last reviewed on 3/30/2023 reads, Intent: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to the following procedures related to the proper documentation and utilization of a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) to ensure a comprehensive and accurate assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessments accurately reflected the resident's status at the time of assessment for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services, Residents #27 and #41, and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge, Resident #179. Findings include: 1. Review of Hospice Medicare Revocation Statement signed by Resident #27 showed the resident had revoked the hospice election on 11/23/2022 to seek aggressive treatment. Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed hospice care while a resident under Section O. Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs. During an interview on 11/3/2023 at approximately 7:45 AM, the Director of Nursing stated Resident #27 should not be coded as hospice. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) last reviewed on 3/30/2023 reads, Intent: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to the following procedures related to the proper documentation and utilization of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services, Resident #41, and 1 of 8 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #41's physician order dated 9/29/2023 reads, [Hospice's name] Hospice. Review of Resident #41 progress notes dated 7/28/2023 reads, Consultation done on shift. [Hospice's name] consultation nurse stated that a nurse will be out to facility Monday and patient will be assigned a case manager at that time. Review of Resident #41's medical records revealed an RN-Initial Comprehensive Assessment for hospice completed on 7/28/2023. Review of Resident #41's care plan revealed no focus or interventions for hospice services. During an interview on 11/1/2023 at 10:37 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, Once hospice is recommended for a resident and the resident is signed up, we will include the services in the resident's care plan. [Resident #41's name] is receiving hospice services and should have been care planned. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for wound care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions, Resident #4. Findings include: During an observation on 10/30/2023 at 10:35 AM, Resident #4 was sitting in her wheelchair with a dressing dated 10/25/2023 on her right forearm (photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 10/30/2023 at 10:35 AM, Resident #4 stated, I have a skin tear on my arm. Review of Resident #4's physician order dated 10/13/2023 reads, Cleanse right forearm skin tear with NS [Normal Saline] apply TAO [triple-antibiotic ointment] with dry dressing. Monitor for s/s [signs/symptoms] of pain, infection, and or any concerns. Notify MD [Medical Doctor] as needed, in the evening for right forearm skin tear. During an interview on 11/1/2023 at 10:48 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, Staff is supposed to follow physician orders. Dressing should have been changed daily. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Wound Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received restorative services as recommended by the physical therapist to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living, Resident #161. Findings include: Review of Resident #161's care plan initiated on 5/20/2023 revealed Resident #161 was a high risk for falls related to gait/balance problems with a history of pelvic fracture and unaware of safety needs. Fall prevention interventions included physical therapy evaluation and treatment as ordered or as needed. Review of Resident #161's physical therapy discharge summary for the dates of service of 6/17/2023 through 8/4/2023, reads, Discharge Recommendations and Status, Range of Motion Program Established/ Trained: Patient is currently able to move feet up and down, and tier is functional and with Restorative Nursing Program, patient will be able to move feet up and down and move legs up and down by performing the following Restorative Nursing interventions: allow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #169. Findings include: During an observation on 10/30/2023 at 12:36 PM, Resident #169 was eating independently in her room, with no supplement noted on her meal tray. During an observation on 10/31/2023 at 12:40 PM, Resident #169 was eating independently in her room, with no supplement noted on her meal tray. During an interview on 11/1/2023 at 12:35 PM, Resident #169's family member stated, I have not seen any supplements come with her lunch meals when I have been present. Review of Resident #169's physician order dated 9/14/2023 reads, Liberal Renal Diet, Regular Texture, Thin Consistency. Review of Resident #169's physician order dated 9/21/2023 reads, Weight: Daily x [times] 3 consecutive days and then weekly one time a day every Mon [Monday]. Review of Resident #169's Nutrition Assessment with an effective date of 10/11/2023 Reads, A. Data . 5. Rate of weight loss/gain as 5%. B. Nutrition . 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in 1 of 3 medication rooms, and 1 of 4 medication carts. Findings include: During an observation of the Medication Room in the Ocean View Unit with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/ Unit Manager, on [DATE] at 9:55 AM, there was an open vial of Latanoprost ophthalmologic drops with no opened and expiration date. During an observation of the Front Hallway [NAME] Cart with Staff B, LPN/ Unit Manager on [DATE] at 10:12 AM, there were one opened Lyumjev KwikPen with no opened and expiration date, one opened insulin glargine-yfgn pen with no opened and expiration date, one Breo Elipta inhaler with no opened and expiration date and the front label reading discard (6 weeks), and one unopened insulin glargine-yfgn 10 milliliter (ml) vial with the label reading refrigerate until opened. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:12 AM, Staff B, LPN/ Unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in the kitchen cooler and in the stock/storage room areas in accordance with professional standards. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 10/30/2023 at 9:15 AM, there were a full-size black tub with 3 large raw roasts with no type of identifying label or date on the product or the container, a sandwich labeled tuna and dated 10/25, and a clear bag with what appeared to be pineapple and peaches or mandarin orange bits without a date or label in the walk-in cooler. There were boxes of vanilla wafers, and four opened bread containers with no received or opened date in the stock room. During an interview on 10/30/2023 at 9:30 AM, the CDM verified that all food items should be labeled and dated in the cooler and stock/storage room. The CDM confirmed that all sandwiches should be correctly labeled and dated for storage and discarded on the 3rd day. The CDM could not confirm if the date on the tuna sandwich was the date it was made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were documented accurately for wound care treatments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident #4), and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for turning and positioning and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #430). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 10/30/2023 at 10:35 AM, Resident #4 was sitting in her wheelchair with a dressing dated 10/25/2023 on her right forearm. During an interview on 10/30/2023 at 10:35 AM, Resident #4 stated, I have a skin tear on my arm. Review of Resident #4's physician order dated 10/13/2023 reads, Cleanse right forearm skin tear with NS [Normal Saline] apply TAO [triple-antibiotic ointment] with dry dressing. Monitor for s/s [signs/symptoms] of pain, infection, and or any concerns. Notify MD [Medical Doctor] as needed, in the evening for right forearm skin tear. Review of Resident #4's Treatment Administration Record for October 2023 showed staff initials for completion of wound treatment for forearm skin tear on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SUMMIT CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALATKA SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/08/2021 |
| JACOBSON, SCOTT | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2022 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 105652. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.