Ybor City Center For Rehabilitation And Healing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 62.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-12-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the prevention and development of pressure wounds for one resident (#1) out of three residents reviewed.Fundings included: Review of Resident #1's admission history and physical, dated 11/26/25 showed under chief complaint: R (right) foot infection. History of present illness: [Resident #1] is an [AGE] year-old patient with Alzheimer's, dementia, hx. (history of CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) with R lower and upper contracture, RLE (right Lower Extremity) osteomyelitis, . who presents for worsening right foot wound. Pt. unable to contribute to history due to underlying dementia and fatigue. History obtained from [family member] over the phone. Reportedly patient was put in an ALF (adult Living Facility) on 11/18 as [family member} was out of state. When she returned yesterday she visited [Resident #1]. she noted an infected R foot with open wounds on R foot, R heel and R knee. Prior to the ALF, Pt. reportedly had no ulcers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to address a change in condition in a timely manner for one Resident (#1) out of three residents sampled. Findings included: On 03/03/2026 at 12:53 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #1's Resident Representative (RR). The RR stated after the initial X-ray the facility called him letting him know the Xray came back clear, so he was thinking everything was fine. The RR stated after a week or so he went to visit the resident and noticed swelling on her arm and her hand looked to be hanging in a weird position, like hanging down, so he reached to feel the arm to see if it was warm because he was concerned about a possible blood clot. The RR stated when he barely touched the arm right above the wrist Resident #1 screamed out in pain. He stated he notified the nurse and they said they would address it. The RR stated he called the facility 4 or 5 times, asking for the Director of Nurses (DON) to see what the plan was for Resident #1. He stated he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program related to live pests found in two rooms (210 and 350) located in two halls (200 and 300) out of 4 halls observed.Findings included: An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/21/2025 at 9:40 A.M. revealed several roaches on the wall behind Bed 2's nightstand and under and around the floor of Bed 3's armoire/closet. An observation of the outside of the maintenance area on 10/21/2025 at 11:20 A.M. revealed a resident nightstand. The Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) was spraying the nightstand with a red can of ant and roach pesticide. The nightstand had three drawers that were partially pulled out and each drawer contained personal resident items. A record review of the pest sighting logbooks on each nursing station revealed an entry dated 10/20/2025 and read, 200 Nurse Cart Roach. The entry was made by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). A record review of the exterminators invoice dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor a residents right to refuse medications for one resident (#2) out of four residents sampled. Findings included: During an observation on 06/09/2025 at 10:40 a.m., Resident #2 was observed dressed for the day sitting in a wheelchair on the back patio. Review of Resident #2's admission record revealed an admission date of 03/25/2025. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan, dated 04/01/2025, revealed the following: Focus: The resident has a behavior problem related to refusing to allow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed protect a residents right to be free from abuse for one resident (#2) out of four residents sampled. Findings included: During an observation on 06/09/2025 at 10:40 a.m., Resident #2 was observed dressed for the day sitting in a wheelchair on the back patio. Review of Resident #2's admission record revealed an admission date of 03/25/2025. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan, dated 04/01/2025, revealed the following: Focus: The resident has a behavior problem related to refusing to allow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured on two units (300 and 400) out of four units in the facility. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 6/9/25 at 9:25 a.m. at the 400-unit nurses' station. The door to the nurses' station was open, no staff were in sight, and the medication refrigerator in the station was observed to be unlocked. There were floor to ceiling cabinets next to the refrigerator that were also unlocked, and the top cabinet was full of over-the-counter (OTC) medications. The medications were accessible to residents, visitors, or unlicensed staff. An observation was conducted on 6/9/25 at 9:32 a.m. in the 300-unit common area. There was a treatment cart sitting in the resident common area unlocked. No staff were in sight at the time. The treatment cart was observed to contain prescription medications and wound care supplies. A follow-up observation was conducted on 6/9/25 at 12:46 at the 400-unit nurses' station. The medication refrigerator and cabinet with the OTC…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review. the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to showering for two (#2, #4) of three residents sampled and related to incontinence care for two (#2, #3) of three residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #2's admission Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), anemia, diabetes, hypertension, myocardium infarction sleep apnea, and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Under Section GG - Functional Abilities showed the resident needed moderate assistance for toileting hygiene and maximal assistance for toilet transfer. Section O, Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs showed Occupational Therapy (OT) started on 10/14/2024 and Physical Therapy (PT) started…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure four (#5, #6, #9, and #10) residents of seventy-three had access to the call light system as evidence by call light pull strings were not within their reach. Findings included: On 11/7/24 at 9:30 a.m. Resident #5 was observed lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. The resident's head of bed was raised greater than 45 degrees. The observation revealed the resident's call light pull string was lying on the bedside dresser, which was pushed up against the wall behind and next to the resident's bed, the end of the cord was observed under boxes sitting on top of dresser. Photographic evidence was obtained. On 11/7/24 at 9:30 a.m. Resident #6 was observed lying in bed, curled up and facing the door. The resident's call light pull string was at the resident's head of bed and dropped through the mattress holder onto the floor. The resident would have had to reach behind and above him to reach the cord/string. An interview and observation was conducted with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 11/7/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide therapy services in a timely manner for one (#2) of three sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record for Resident #2 showed she was admitted to the facility on 107/2024 with diagnoses included but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, Urinary Tract Infection, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), myocardial infarction, and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Section GG Functional Abilities showed she needed moderate assistance for toileting hygiene and maximal assistance for toilet transfer. Section O, Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs showed Occupational Therapy (OT) started on 10/14/2024 and Physical Therapy (PT) started on 10/12/2024. Review of the Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review. and interview. the facility failed to maintain the medical record of one (#3) of three residents sampled in an appropriate manner related to complete and accuracy of the records. Findings included: Review of the admission Record for Resident #3 showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] following a hospital stay. The admission Record revealed diagnoses not limited to presence of left artificial knee joint, unilateral primary osteoarthritis of left knee, difficulty in walking not elsewhere classified, unspecified anxiety disorder, and recurrent unspecified major depressive disorder. The record revealed the resident's primary language was English. Review of the Nursing Admission/ readmission Screening/ History, effective 11/1/2024 at 12:04 p.m. for Resident #3 revealed the other language spoken by resident #4 was Spanish. The screening did not reveal the resident spoke English. Review of the Continence Evaluation for Resident #3 showed the resident was oriented x 3 (person,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for four (250, 310, 330, and 350) of eight rooms observed during four (03/25/2024, 03/26/2024, 03/27/2024, and 03/28/2024) of four days. Findings included: On 3/25/24 at 09:35 a.m., during the initial tour, an observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Loose wires were noted between two residents' beds (photographic evidence obtained). Continuing with the initial tour at 10:00 a.m. on the 300 hallway, room [ROOM NUMBER] had privacy curtains with brown and red spots and black streaks at the bottom of one set of curtains, and a dirty floor (photographic evidence obtained). In room [ROOM NUMBER] loose wires we observed between residents' beds, a dirty and dusty AC (air conditioning) Vent, cluttered furniture without access to light cord for resident and/or staff to reach, and the hot water knob for the sink would not turn off (photographic evidence obtained). The main shower room for the 300…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$43,050 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $43,050 — penalty dated 2025-10-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SUMMIT CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL