Valencia Hills Health And Rehabilitation Center
1350 Sleepy Hill Rd, Lakeland, FL 33810 · For profit - Corporation · 249 certified beds · (863) 858-4402 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $62,766 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-30)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.5% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.2% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 2.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.4% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.5% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.6% | 9.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 2.13 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.85 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.9%CMS range 36.2–54.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 8.0–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 77.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 5.9–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 249 beds and averages 216.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with the nursing staff, Nursing Home Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the facility's Risk Manager, the facility's Medical Director, the resident's family member and review of the resident's medical record and facility policies, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by not ensuring one (#1) of 58 residents at risk for elopement, was provided with supervision and services related to the resident's known cognitive deficits and history of wandering before admission to the facility. The facility staff failed to ensure the safety of Resident #1; between approximately 2:45 PM on 11/27/2023 and 5:30 PM on 11/27/2023, Resident #1 ambulated from the dementia care unit, followed behind a staff member through a door equipped with an electromagnetic locking device (a magnetic lock that is unlocked when de-energized and requires power to remain locked) and into an outdoor enclosed porch area. Resident #1 opened a wooden gate in the outdoor enclosed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with the nursing staff, Nursing Home Administrator, the Director of Nursing, the facility's Risk Manager, the facility's Medical Director, the resident's family member and review of the resident's medical record and facility policies, facility failed to ensure one resident (#1) of 58 residents at risk for elopement, was provided with supervision and services related to the resident's known cognitive deficits and history of wandering before admission to the facility. The facility staff failed to ensure the safety of Resident #1; between approximately 2:45 PM on 11/27/2023 and 5:30 PM on 11/27/2023, Resident #1 ambulated from the dementia care unit, followed behind a staff member through a door equipped with an electromagnetic locking device (a magnetic lock that is unlocked when de-energized and requires power to remain locked) and into an outdoor enclosed porch area. Resident #1 opened a wooden gate in the outdoor enclosed porch area, which was left unlatched and unlocked by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent resident to resident altercation for five (Residents: #20, #51, #126, #185, #192) of five residents reviewed. This failure resulted in three resident-to-resident physical altercations on one (500-unit) of five units. Findings Include:1. On 04/27/2026 at 10:52 AM, an observation was made of two residents yelling at each other in the dining room of the 500 units. An activities aid was sitting at the table with the two residents. A nurse and the medical records coordinator responded to the situation, after two minutes of the argument. At the same time, Resident #20 had walked over to resident #185, who was sitting in a wheelchair and watching television (TV). Resident #185 was in the middle of the dining room, and Resident #20 poked and shoved the right side of Resident #185's head near the ear. Staff continued to assist the other two residents, who were continuing to argue. Resident #20 then walked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to one of one dish washing machines was not operated per its specifications. Findings included: On 4/27/2026 at 9:45 a.m. the kitchen was toured with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), and the Regional Dietary Manager. The CDM stated the kitchen operates a low temperature dishwashing machine. The CDM further stated the machine's operation includes wash temperatures to reach at least 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and the final rinse temperature to reach at least 120 degrees F. The CDM continued to state the machine provides a chemical sanitizer and with a litmus test strip for chemical sanitizer testing to reach 50 - 100 parts per million (ppm). On 4/27/2026 at 10:02 a.m. an observation of the dishwashing machine room occurred with the CDM. Staff were already utilizing the machine and were running soiled crates of dishes through the dishwashing machine.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable, homelike and clean environment to include; 1. Resident room water temperatures not hot; 2. Shower room bathing equipment with bio-growth in two of six community shower rooms, and 3. Loud alarm noises during meal services during four of four days observed (4/27/2026, 4/28/2026, 4/29/2026, and 4/30/2026). Findings included: On 4/27/2026 at 10:45 a.m., 4/28/2026 at 10:15 a.m., and again on 4/30/2026 at 8:30 a.m., the following was observed by turning on the sink hot water, letting it run for over three minutes and using the back of the hand to feel the actual water temperature:1. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom sink had no water pressure. There was only air spraying out from spigot after turning both hot and cold turn knobs.2. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom sink hot water was not hot, it was less than lukewarm. 3. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] room sink hot water was not hot, it was less than lukewarm almost…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide life enriching activities and assistance with activities for cognitively impaired residents residing on the secured unit of one cognitively impaired unit reviewed, failed to provide activities to one (Resident #7) of one bedridden residents, and failed to facilitate and assist one (Resident #120) of one residents with outside activities.Findings included: On 4/27/26 at 11:30 a.m. twelve of the forty-one residents residing in the 500-hall secure unit were sitting in dining room during a sensory activity with eyes closed and heads bowed. Staff Y, Activity Aide (AA), was observed sitting at a corner table occupied by one resident assisting with a jigsaw puzzle. The observation did not show the aide interacted or encouraged other residents. Review of the monthly 500-unit calendar showed Sensory Club was scheduled on 4/27/26 at 11:00 a.m. On 4/27/26 at 4:20 p.m., Staff Z, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed sitting at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection control program related to 1) cleanliness and maintenance of the laundry room, 2) educate staff on hand hygiene and personal protective equipment required for the prevention of spreading Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) after two (#41 and #91) of two residents tested positive for the highly contagious bacteria and two (#1 and #39) of two sampled residents were actively being tested for the bacteria and 3) provide Pneumococcal immunization for one (R#20) of five residents sampled for the administration of vaccinations.Findings included: On 4/29/26 at 10:13 a.m. the facility laundry room was observed with the Housekeeping Director (HD) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The observers entered the clean area of the laundry area. The HD stated the area was swept multiple times a day. The observation revealed wire shelving units to the right of the doorway (facing from door into area)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure call light accessibility for one (Resident #94) of 10 residents reviewed.Findings included: During an observation on 4/27/2026 at 9:57 a.m. Resident #94 's call light was seen tangled with the roommate's call light, located under the roommate's bed.Review of Resident #94 admission record revealed an admission date of 2/9/2023 and a readmission date of 5/13/2023. Resident #94 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include but not limited to gastritis, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, persistent mood disorders, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, insomnia, hemorrhage of anus and rectum. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/27/2026 at 10:00 a.m. the DON stated Resident #94's call light was not within reach and was located under the bed.During an interview on 4/29/2026 at 1:57 p.m. Staff N, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said call lights should be located next to residents. Staff N always checked call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screen and Annual Review (PASRR) was accurate for one (Resident #81) of two residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings Include: Review of Resident #81's admission record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and dementia. Review of Resident #81's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14/15, which reflected intact cognition; and acknowledged Feeling down, depressed or hopeless 7-11 days a week. Review of the psychiatry progress note dated 4/10/26 revealed . Depression: Little interest in doing things, Feeling down/depressed/hopeless, Trouble falling or staying asleep, Feeling tired, Appetite problems, Feeling bad about self, Trouble concentrating, Moving or speaking slowly. Review of the medical records revealed no evidence of a Level II PASRR (Preadmission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plan problem areas related to oxygen therapy for one (Resident #11) of six sampled residents. Findings included:On 4/27/2026 at 10:30 a.m., 4/28/2026 at 8:45 a.m., 10:45 a.m., 2:00 p.m. and on 4/29/2026 at 8:10 a.m. Resident #11 was observed with oxygen being delivered by the way of a nasal canula with a flow rate of 1.5 liters per minute (lpm). Resident #11 was not able to answer questions related to his medical care and services. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the advance directives revealed Resident #11 had a Power of Attorney to make his medical and financial decisions. Review of the diagnosis list revealed no specific diagnosis related to respiratory functions.Review of the current month 4/2026 Physician's Order Sheet revealed orders to include but not limited to: Oxygen (O2) at 2 lpm, as need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure access to vision services for one (Resident #73) of one resident reviewed for communication and sensory problems.Findings included: On 4/27/2026 at 1:13 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #73 in her room. Resident #73 stated she would like to visit an ophthalmologist (eye doctor). She said staff told her she was placed on a list months ago. She does not know why they have not followed up with her on this request. She said she can see with her current glasses but due to her glaucoma she would like an examination. A review of Resident #73's admission Record showed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including but not limited to glaucoma. A review of Resident #73's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating intact cognition and showed she uses corrective lenses. Review of Resident #73's active Care Plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and manufacturer specification review the facility failed to maintain the settings of a low air loss mattress for one (#12) of two residents investigated for the worsening and/or development of pressure ulcers. Findings included: On 4/27/26 at 10:55 a.m. Resident #12 was observed lying in bed atop of a low-air mattress, the resident refused to have staff and writer observe surgical area on lateral right leg. The elderly resident appeared to be of a weight consistent with age. The pump for the mattress was hanging from the foot board end of the bed, was set for static, low pressure and the weight (pounds) setting revealed 350 pounds, the highest setting possible. The dial for setting the weight was manual, requiring staff to turn the knob to then correct weight of the resident. On 4/29/26 at 11:35 a.m. Resident #12's air mattress was observed; the resident was out of bed. The pump settings continued to be set for static, low pressure and 350 pounds. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #13) received meals prior to going to dialysis out of one resident reviewed for dialysis.Findings included: On 04/29/2026 at 8:30 AM observed Resident #13 at the nurses' station in wheelchair. He stated he was going for dialysis and would talk with me when he got back from dialysis. He did not have any belongings or food with him. On 04/29/2026 at 4:00 PM an interview with Resident #13 was conducted. He stated he does not get his meal before he leaves for dialysis. He stated he used to, but it has been like this for about the past month. He stated he goes to dialysis on the Monday, Wednesday, Friday (MWF) schedule. Review of Resident #13's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. He had diagnoses to include end-stage renal disease (ESRD), hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #13's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was not greater than 5%. A total of 27 opportunities were observed with 2 errors constituting an error rate of 7.41%. Findings included:1. On 04/29/2026 at 8:34 AM a medication observation was conducted with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #131. Staff C dispensed the following medications:-Amlodipine 2.5 mg (milligram) -1 tablet-Aspirin 81mg chewable -1 tablet-Zyrtec 10mg -1 tablet-donepezil 5 mg -1tablet-Famotidine 10mg -4 tablets-Losartan 25 mg -1 tabletStaff C, LPN confirmed the tablets prior to administration.Review of Resident #131's admission Record showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: cerebral atherosclerosis, vascular dementia, dementia, and hypertension. Review of Resident #131's active orders showed:-Donepezil HCl (hydrochloride) Tablet 5 mg; Give 10 mg by mouth one time a day for dementia.2. On 04/29/2026 at 4:30 PM a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide timely laboratory services for one (Resident #130) of three residents reviewed.Findings included: Review of Resident #130's admission record revealed an admission date of 5/2/2024. Diagnosis includes but not limited to fracture of the lower end of right radius, nondisplaced fracture of right ulna styloid, chronic diastolic heart failure, and convulsions. Review of Resident #130's progress notes revealed a nursing note on 3/13/2026 at 10:11 p.m. showing Resident #130 had swelling of the right arm and right hand, felt hard and a little warm to touch. The resident's cast was removed from this arm on 2/19/2026 from a previous fracture. The note also said Resident #130 had range of motion within normal limits (ROM WNL), hospice and facility physician were notified. Review of Resident #130's progress notes revealed a nursing note on 3/14/2026 at 6:15 a.m. that a new order was placed for a venous ultrasound of the right upper extremity. Review of Resident #130's progress notes revealed a nursing note on 3/15/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided to residents identified as requiring enhanced monitoring (EM), one to one (1:1) supervision, and/or continuous monitoring (CM) for six residents (#1, #3, #4, #6, #22, and #24) out of six residents sampled. Findings included:1. A review of Resident #1's admission record revealed an admission date of 4/15/25, with diagnoses to include unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and adjustment disorder with anxiety.A review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed the following:- Device: Wander Management Bracelet - Check Function with machine every night shift for elopement risk, with a start date of 9/1/25.A review of the facility's reportable incident log showed the following:- Date of Incident 2/23/26 [Resident #1] + [and] [Resident name] Type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0773 — patternProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal laboratory (lab) values for three residents (#7, #18 and #26) out of eight residents sampled. Findings Included:During an interview on 3/10/26 at 12:58 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) said for abnormal laboratory test values the nursing staff are expected to notify the doctor as soon as possible and the notification should be documented in the medical records.1) A review of Resident #7's admission record showed an admission date 2/4/26 with a primary diagnosis of left ilium (pelvic) fractureA review of Resident #7's lab report results revealed on 3/7/26 reported at 5:55 p.m. a TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) level was 26.99, reference range 0.45-5.33 uI/ml (units/milliliter).A review of Resident #7's nursing note, dated 3/9/26 at 3:32 p.m. showed Received order to increase Levothyroxine to 200 mcg (micrograms) daily and repeat lab in a week.A review of Resident #7's nursing note dated 3/9/26 at 6:53 p.m. showed son made aware of increase on Levothyroxine and lab to be repeated in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented related to one to one supervision/enhanced monitoring for one resident (#24) out of ten residents sampled. Findings included: A review of Resident #24's admission record revealed an admission date of 1/14/25 with diagnoses to include cerebral atherosclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, severe, with anxiety, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances, restlessness and agitation, and other specified anxiety disorders.A review of the facility's reportable incident log showed the following:- Date of Incident 3/3/26 [Resident #24] /+ [Resident name] Type of Allegation * Sexual .A review of Resident #24's comprehensive care plan revealed the following: - [Resident #24] can be sexually inappropriate at times r/t dx [diagnosis] of Dementia. Date Initiated: 03/10/2026, with interventions to include, Enhanced monitoring by staff as necessary. Revision on: 3/11/2026. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care for one resident (#12) out of three sampled for activities of daily living. Findings includedAn interview conducted on 3/10/26 at 12:13 PM with Resident #12 revealed the resident had many concerns with staff coming timely to provide incontinence and toileting care. The resident stated there had been many instances where the resident had a bowel movement (BM) and no staff would come timely to provide care when it was needed.A review of Resident #12's admission record revealed an admission date of 7/31/25 with diagnoses to include: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, legal blindness, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and adjustment disorder with anxiety.A review of Resident #12's Bowel and Bladder- Bowel Elimination Task documentation revealed the following:March no care marked on:Shift 11 PM-7 AM: 3/3Shift 3 PM-11 PM: 3/9February no care marked on:Shift 11 PM-7 AM: 2/28Shift 7 AM-3 PM: 2/3, 2/19January no care marked on:Shift 11 PM-7 AM: 1/10, 1/31Shift 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review of the facility's Shift to Shift Controlled Medication count sheets, the facility did not ensure accurate documentation of controlled substances count logs for three carts (200-A, 100A - and100-B) out of ten medication carts. On 02/03/2026 at 9:25 a.m., an observation was made of the medication cart identified as cart 200-A. A review of cart 200 -A's narcotic book showed the Shift-to-Shift Controlled Medication Count with no entry for this morning's count. Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who was assigned to the 200-A medication cart stated she forgot to mark the number of total narcotic cards, but the count was correct. On 02/03/2026 at 9:59 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff C, LPN. Staff C, LPN, stated during shift change, two nurses, the off coming shift nurse and the oncoming nurse, must count the narcotic cards in the Shift-to-Shift Controlled Medication Count as well as each individual residents' narcotic medication. Both nurses will sign the Shift-to-Shift Controlled Medication Count. Staff C, LPN, stated if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's Plan of Correction (POC), the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee effectively implemented and monitored corrective actions to prevent recurrence of deficient practices. The facility had previously been cited under F 755 during a complaint survey conducted on 2/3/26 and developed a Plan of Correction with a completion date of 3/2/26. The review showed the facility did not fully implement or sustain the corrective actions identified in the Plan of Correction.Findings Included:A review of in-service/training by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) showed education with the following objectives was started on 2/3/26.:-Narcotic shift to shift documentation (count sheet)-Add and remove in the comment section.-Must be signed at the time of the count-Narcotic count when received from pharmacy.The in-service training record showed the education was provided between 2/3/26 and 3/2/26 for all nurses except the nurses on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately reconcile an anti-psychotic medication per their policy, for one resident (#5) out of three residents sampled.Findings included: A record review of Resident #5's admission record showed an original admission date of 01/27/2023 with a readmission date of 01/12/2026 with diagnoses to include but not limited to major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and other specified persistent mood disorders.A record review of Resident #5's hospital discharge medication list dated 01/12/2026 at 08:46 a.m., revealed a current order of an antipsychotic medication Lurasidone, (also known as Latuda) 20 milligram (mg) oral tablet to be given with supper.Review of Resident #5's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed on date 01/12/2026 when the resident readmitted to the facility, there was no new medication listed on the Order Summary Report signed by the facility doctor on 01/13/2026. An admission progress notes dated 01/12/2026 on page thirty-seven under medication reconciliation and the hospitals recommended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0773 — patternProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to promptly notify the physician of laboratory testing results for two (Residents #1 and #2) of two residents sampled. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses of unspecified fracture of left acetabulum subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, unspecified fracture of right talus subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the primary care physician note dated, 10/2/25, for Resident #2 showed the resident had been in a motor vehicle accident resulting in a left acetabulum fracture and right talus fracture. The objective data gathered by the physician showed bilateral lungs were clear to auscultation (CTA), no shortness of breath (SOB) or dyspnea on exertion (DOE). The plan was for Staff to report any new or worsening issues, complications, or symptoms to provider via SBAR (Situation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment related to pest sightings in five Wings (100, 200, 300, 400, and 500) of the five facility Wings toured. Findings included: During a tour of the dining room across from the therapy gym on 7/22/25 at 1 p.m., a live small eight-legged insect was observed crawling on the floor. An unidentified staff member confirmed the observation and stated it was a spider. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). On 7/22/25 at 12:00 p.m. in the 400-wing, an observation was made of approximately five live insects, flattened, oval-shaped body, long antennae and six legs coming out of the 400-wing linen closet. The insects crawled underneath the base boards when the light was turned on. Multiple interviews were conducted on 7/21/25 from 1:50 p.m. to 2:20 p.m. with alert and oriented residents revealing the following:Resident #7 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a BIMS (Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to inform the family of changes in condition for one resident (#6) of three sampled residents. Findings included:Review of admission record showed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/12/2025 with diagnoses included but not limited to Transient Ischemic Accident, congestive heart failure, Cerebrovascular accident, Stage 4 chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Review of the physician orders for Resident #5 showed:Complete Metabolic Profile (CMP), Basic Metabolic Profile (BMP) ordered on 07/07/2025 and 07/08/2025Lasix 20 mg (milligrams) daily as a diuretic as of 07/06/2025Potassium 10 meq. (milliequivalents) daily for hypokalemia as of 07/08/2025Review of the July 2025 Medication Administration Record showed Potassium 10 meq. (milliequivalents) daily for hypokalemia as of 07/08/2025 was given on 07/09, 07/10, 07/11, and 07/12 2025. Review of the Lab Results Report showed on 07/07/2025 Potassium was 2.98 acceptable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#3) of three sampled residents was free from the abusive behavior of a staff member. Findings included: On 10/30/24 at 9:30 a.m., Resident #3 was observed with Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) lying in bed, dressed, and with eyes closed. The staff member stated the resident would be up (awake) for days then sleep. Staff C reported being educated on abuse approximately 6 months ago and had not witnessed any type of abuse. Review of Resident #3's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses not limited to unspecified severity unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, unspecified depression, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and unspecified mood (affective) disorder. Review of six months of the facility's Abuse Logs showed one abuse allegation perpetrated by a staff member against a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to screen one (#4) of three sampled residents for trauma-informed care following allegations of abuse. Findings included: Review of the Abuse Log, containing allegations from 5/3/24 to 10/23/24 revealed an allegation made by Resident #4 on 7/23/24 at 11:45 a.m. of a volunteer that had molested the resident. Review of Resident #4's admission Record showed the resident had been admitted on [DATE] and 9/26/23. The record included diagnoses not limited to Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia without mention of fluctuations, unspecified severity unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Significant Change in Status assessment completed on 6/24/24, approximately one month prior to the allegation, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The quarterly BIMS score, 9/23/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated in the walk-in refrigerator, temperature logs were completed per facility policy, and dinnerware was properly sanitized. Findings included: An observation on 03/05/24 at 9:05 a.m., revealed a walk-in refrigerator that contained food items that were not labeled or dated. The items consisted of: - One 4-quart (qt) container of a pureed yellow substance that was identified by Staff E, Dietary Clerk (DC) as apple sauce. - One 4-quart (qt) container of squared yellow substance that was identified by Staff E, DC as pineapples. - One 4-quart (qt) container of squared white substance that was identified by Staff E, DC as pears. - 2 long metal pans of yellow substance that was identified by Staff E, DC as macaroni and cheese. - An opened package of orange shredded substance re-wrapped in plastic wrap that was identified by staff E, DC as shredded cheddar cheese. Photographic evidence obtained. During an interview on 03/05/24 at 9:05 a.m., Staff E, DC stated all food items in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of one walk in refrigerator was free from ice buildup and was maintained in safe operating conditions. Findings included: An observation on 03/04/24 at 9:10 a.m., showed a walk-in refrigerator with lots of ice on the floor. A huge icicle located on the walk-in refrigerator ceiling above the ice on the floor was dripping. Photographic evidence obtained. In an interview on 03/04/24 at 9:10 a.m., Staff E, Dietary Clerk (DC) stated yes, this walk-in refrigerator has been like this for a while. Staff E, DC stated she heard it accumulated ice because the walk-in refrigerator ran too cold. Staff E, DC stated the facility was aware of the concern and in the past talked about getting a new walk-in refrigerator. During an interview on 03/06/24 at 12:08 p.m., Staff J, Environmental Services (ES) stated he was aware of the ice buildup in the walk-in refrigerator as the maintenance department was scheduled to go into the kitchen two times a week to remove the ice buildup. Staff J, ES stated he did not think the walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for seven (Residents #38, #3, #1, #149, #151, #177,and #189) out of 44 initially sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An observation and interview was conducted on 3/4/24 at 11:27 a.m. with Resident #38. The resident voiced not wanting to discuss a diagnosed condition. A review of Resident #38's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified bipolar disorder, unspecified schizoaffective disorder, unspecified single episode major depressive disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), borderline personality disorder, and unspecified paraphilia. The Psychotherapy note, dated 12/7/23, showed the resident continued with anxiety and depression and the interventions used would be cognitive behavioral therapy. The Psychotherapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing and anticoagulant medications were completed and administered per physician orders for one (Resident #182) of one resident sampled for anticoagulant use, failed to obtain orders for management of a Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for one (Resident #86) of one resident sampled for the use of a PICC, failed to obtain physician orders and document the treatment of one (Resident #271) of one resident sampled for undocumented skin condition, and failed to complete dressing changes as ordered for one (Resident #162) of two residents sampled for dressing changes. Findings included: 1. An observation and interview was conducted on 3/4/24 at 11:33 a.m., with Resident #182. The observation revealed the resident's urinary catheter tubing was draining dark red liquid. The resident stated the catheter was not normally like that and the facility was working on it. (Photographic evidence was obtained) An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it had a functioning Quality Assurance Committee. The facility was actively involved in the creation, implementation, and monitoring of the plan of correction for deficient practice identified during a recertification survey on 03/04/24 to 03/07/24 and was cited for F 812 and F908. During the revisit on 04/29/24, the facility was recited for F 812 and F908. The facility had developed a Plan of Correction with a completion date 04/06/24. The facility had not comprehensively implemented the plan of correction for the identified deficiencies. Findings included: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Quality Management revealed the following: Guiding Principles: -The facility will use QAPI to make decisions and improve the day-to-day operations. -QAPI will include all employees, every department and all services provided. -QAPI focuses on systems and processes rather than individuals. -The facility will have a culture that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect during the dining experience for four (2 unknown, #56, and #322) out of four residents requiring supervision on the 300-unit as evidence by not removing dinnerware from meal trays, not serving one (#56) out of three residents seated at the common area table together, removing two (one unknown female and #56) out of two residents from the table until their meals arrived, and standing up while assisting one resident (#273) out of one resident observed for needing dining assistance. Findings included: An observation on 3/4/24 at 12:15 p.m. was conducted of meal service in the 300-unit common area. The observation revealed three residents (Residents #322, #56, and another female resident) sitting at the table in the common area, the two female residents had meal trays, while Resident #56 did not. The observation showed the dinnerware for the two females were not taken off the tray. Staff Q, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), informed Resident #56 that it (meal) was coming soon. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #180) of one sampled resident was free from restraints and was not evaluated for a restraint. Findings included: On 3/4/2024 at 10:33 a.m., Resident #180 was observed lying in a sitting position in his bed. His head was on the upper right side of mattress; legs were at a 90-degree angle (sitting position) over the edge of the left side of the head of the bed. Resident #180's side rails were up in the raised position on both sides. His legs were in front of the top of the rail on the left side. The side rails went from just below the head of the bed to just above the foot of the bed. The bed was approximately 2 feet off the floor. A blue mat was on each side of the bed. The resident was observed moving about in the bed. The privacy curtain was pulled for privacy. The resident was not visible from the hallway. (Photographic evidence obtained of the side rail). On 3/6/2024 at 9:01 a.m., the resident was observed lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for one (Resident #525) of one resident to ensure a resident who entered the facility with a indwelling catheter was assessed and received appropriate physician orders, treatment, and services. Findings Included: On 03/04/2024 at 9:38 a.m., Resident #525 was observed sitting in his bed, with a cast on his right arm and a [Brand name]catheter over his left leg to a drainage bag hanging on the frame of the bed facing the door, no privacy bag present. There was cloudy yellow urine in the tubing and drainage bag. Resident # 525 stated he had the catheter as he had multiple sclerosis (MS) and a neurogenic bladder. Resident #525 stated he had a fall at home which resulted in him having a broken right arm. The resident stated when he first arrived at the facility, they had to change the catheter because the one they put in was too small, was not draining, his bladder felt full, and after they changed to a larger size, he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of one garbage dumpster was maintained in a sanitary condition and free from debris. Findings included: An observation of the facility's garbage area on 03/05/24 at 11:15 a.m., revealed multiple items on the ground around the garbage dumpster. The items were as follows: Photographic evidence obtained. - plastic cup - blue gloves - hamburger buns - plastic spoon - 2 recliners During an interview on 03/05/24 at 11:15 a.m., Staff F, Dietary Manager (DM) stated he was responsible for the dumpster and confirmed the items found around the dumpster should not be there. Staff F, DM stated he tried to come out daily to keep the area around the dumpster cleaned up.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment related to two (500 hall and 200 hall) of two resident shower rooms observed. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 12/18/23 at 12:25 p.m. of the 500-hall, secured unit, shower room. The shower room was observed to have missing plaster on the lower portion of the wall and a hole at the bottom of the shower room door. There was a clear plastic bag full of soiled linen and resident clothing on the floor I the shower room. There were 4 wheelchairs, and all of them had unlabeled resident clothing draped over them along with hangers and plastic bags. In the shower room there were also two walkers, one resident lift, and a large plastic storage rack with labeled bins which were observed to have items overflowing out of the bins and the items were not what the bin was labeled as. The large plastic storage rack was not covered. There were two different sneakers on the bottom of large plastic storage rack along with multiple wheelchair legs rests. There was one shoe under the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for through to their conclusion for three residents (#1, #5, and #8) out of three residents sampled for grievances. Findings included: The Grievance Logs from September 2023 to November 20, 2023 were reviewed. Three grievances were randomly chosen for review from October 2023 and November 2023. Review of a grievance, dated 10/13/2023 for Resident #8, revealed the grievance was filed by a family member related to not changing the resident's linen when they were soiled with urine, and leaving the urine-stained sheets on the bed. The investigative section of the report was blank. Review of a grievance, dated 10/30/2023 for Resident #1, revealed the resident filed the grievance related to not being dressed for therapy, not receiving a bed pan when requested, long response time to call light, and blood sugar levels too low. The investigative section of the report was blank. Review of a grievance,dated 11/3/2023 for Resident #5, revealed the resident filed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for two residents (#1 and #3) of three sampled residents for resident record documentation. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis included but not limited to, fracture of the T7 (thoracic vertebrae 7), T8, T11, and T12, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DM), respiratory failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (A-Fib), depression, Bipolar disorder, GERD (Gastro-esophageal reflux disease), and hypertension (HTN). Review of the physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2023 showed the following documentation missing: Gabapentin 300 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for neuropathy on 10/27/23 Pantoprazole Sodium delayed release 40 mg daily for GERD on 10/26 and 10/27/23 Risperidone 3 mg at bedtime for Bipolar disorder on 10/27/23 Trazodone HCL 50 mg at bedtime for depression on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to control the spread of infection by: 1) failing to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) before entering the rooms of residents under transmission based precautions for one resident (#2) of two residents sampled for transmission based precautions, 2) failing to ensure appropriate signage was posted outside of a resident room under transmission based precautions for one resident (#2) of two residents sampled for transmission based precautions, and 3) failing to ensure physician's orders for transmission based precautions were in place in a timely manner for one resident (#3) of two residents sampled for transmission based precautions. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 11/20/2023 at 10:05 AM outside of Resident #2's room. An isolation caddy was observed outside of Resident #2's room with signage posted on the caddy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility did not ensure residents were treated with dignity during dining related to knocking on the door or announcing oneself prior to entering the room with lunch meals on one hallway of eleven halls on one of five nursing units, during two of two dining services observations. Findings included: On 10/26/21 at 12:52 p.m., an observation was conducted during dining services on the 200 nursing unit A hallway. Staff A, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and Staff H, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) entered room [ROOM NUMBER] with lunch trays without knocking or announcing themselves. After setting up the trays both staff members exited the room after performing hand hygiene, and each removed a tray from the dining cart. At 12:56 p.m. on 10/26/21, an observation was conducted. Staff A, LPN and Staff H, CNA both entered room [ROOM NUMBER] with the lunch trays, without knocking or announcing themselves. On 10/27/21 at 12:38 p.m., an observation was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for five (Residents #12, #37, #72, #97, #307) of 58 sampled residents, related to maintaining resident equipment in good repair for Resident #12 and providing a clean and homelike environment for Residents #37, #72, #97 and #307. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed that she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], had diagnoses that included Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral palsy and had a Basic Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) dated 10/6/21 which indicated a score of 15 (Cognitively intact). On 10/26/21 at 12:24 p.m., Resident #12 was observed sitting in a Geri chair. The chair had a left sided head rest which was noted to be ripped with jagged edges, exposing the internal material of the device. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 10/28/21 at 8:46 a.m., an observation was made of the resident sitting up in bed listening to music. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to a surgical wound for one (Resident #21) of one sampled resident. Findings included: 1. An interview with Resident #21 on 10/27/21 at 10:04 a.m., revealed that he had a surgical wound to his left leg which was not healing. Review of resident #21's record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 14 (Cognitively intact), and had diagnoses that included Cellulitis of left lower limb; acute embolism and Thrombosis of deep veins of left lower extremity; bilateral fem-pop bypass; Recent hospital admission for non-healing surgical wound on the left thigh. Review of the the resident's current physician orders revealed the following: -10/23/21-Weekly skin observations -10/6/21-Mupirocin Oint 2% TID (three times a day) for wound related to infection. Apply to left groin topically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services related to storage of nebulizer equipment, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #183) of one resident investigated for respiratory therapy. Findings included On 10/26/21 at 10:45 a.m., Resident #183 was observed seated in a wheelchair next to the bed in her room. The resident had oxygen running at 4 liters per minute via a nasal cannula from a concentrator in the room. The resident stated she used oxygen at home. A nebulizer machine was observed sitting on the bedside nightstand with a nebulizer mask and tubing noted sitting on top of nightstand in front of the machine. An empty plastic bag was noted on the resident's bed. A Wixela inhaler medication was noted on the over bed table. Resident #183 stated the inhaler medication was from her morning medications and the nebulizer treatment was from the same time. Resident #183 stated the nurse would come back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that prescribed medications were stored in a locked container for two (Residents #21 and #182) of 58 sample residents. Findings included: 1. On 10/28/21 at 10:30 a.m., wound care was observed with Staff I, LPN (licensed practical nurse) for Resident #21. She gathered her supplies, knocked on the door, and asked Resident #21 if she could enter the room. After walking in the room, she grabbed 5 paper towels from the paper towel dispenser and put them on the resident's side table, she then put her supplies on the paper towels and performed hand hygiene with soap and water. Staff I, LPN asked the resident if he had his ointment, and he said yes. Resident #21 pulled a tube of Mupirocin from a large cloth tote bag that was hanging off the arm of a chair in his room. He handed it to the nurse, who then put it on the paper towel barrier. Staff I, LPN then performed Resident #22's wound care using the tube of mupirocin he had handed her.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$62,766 in federal fines across 6 penalties.
- $18,470 — penalty dated 2026-04-30
- $7,660 — penalty dated 2025-12-03
- $12,400 — penalty dated 2025-12-03
- $14,918 — penalty dated 2024-03-07
- $4,659 — penalty dated 2023-11-16
- $4,659 — penalty dated 2023-11-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SUMMIT CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.3 | -2.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 4.3 | -3.3 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAKELAND HOLDING COMPANY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/04/2003 |
| CH SUMMIT CARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| MADISON SNF OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| SEAM NY 2020 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/04/2023 |
| SK SUMMIT CARE II HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| SUMMIT CARE GROUP II OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/02/2023 |
| DAVIS, ALAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2014 |
| MITCHELL, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/04/2003 |
| MCMANUS, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/03/2023 |
| SUMMIT CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2023 |
| AYALA, CYNTHIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/21/2025 |
| VAILOCES, V J | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/06/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105301. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.