No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Diamond Ridge Health And Rehabilitation Center

2730 W Marc Knighton Ct, Lecanto, FL 34461 · For profit - Individual · 142 certified beds · (352) 746-9500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (352) 746-9500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 13 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3404 N Lecanto Hwy · (352) 513-4867 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2804 W Marc Knighton Ct · (352) 249-9258 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3565 N Lecanto Hwy · (352) 746-7080 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2804 W Marc Knighton Ct · (352) 527-7540 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.8%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.9%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.6%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.0%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.0%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.7%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.9%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.642.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.961.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 629 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 249 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 49% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.4%CMS range 65.8–72.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.8–11.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.6%CMS range 4.1–7.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
43.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 130.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments for the residents with newly evident mental disorder for 5 of 6 resident reviewed (Residents #1, #12, #14, #87, and #139). Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #12's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 10/4/2023 revealed anxiety disorder was checked under mental illness. No other diagnosis was checked. Review of Resident #12's admission record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and was subsequently diagnosed with recurrent mild major depressive disorder with onset date of 12/12/2023 and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) with onset date of 10/5/2023. Review of Resident #12's clinical records failed to reveal documentation that Resident #12 was later identified with a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder and was referred to the appropriate state designated authority for evaluation. 2) Review of Resident #14's Level I PASRR dated 8/19/2024 revealed anxiety disorder was checked under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #15). Findings include: During an observation on 7/20/2025 at 11:22 AM, Resident #15 was lying flat in the bed. There was a fall mat lying on the left side of bed and no fall mat on the right side of the bed. There was a fall mat folded up and lying under the bed (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 7/21/2025 at 9:46 AM, Resident #15 was lying flat in the bed. There was a fall mat lying on the left side of bed and no fall mat on the right side of the bed. There was a fall mat folded up and lying under the bed. During an observation on 7/21/2025 at 3:50 PM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, There is no mat on the right side of the bed because she only gets up on the left side of the bed. Review of Resident #15's physician order dated 4/9/2025 read, Floormats at bedside while Res. [Resident] in bed every shift for monitoring. Review of Resident #15's care plan initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered parameters for administering hypertension medications were followed for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents #39, #139). Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #139’s physician order dated 6/20/2025 read, “Olmesartan Medoxomil Tablet 20 MG [milligram], Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension, hold for SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] less than 130.” Review of Resident #139’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2025 for administration of Olmesartan Medoxomil showed the medication was administered outside the ordered parameters on 7/2/2025 for blood pressure of 121/63, on 7/3/2025 for blood pressure of 121/66, on 7/12/2025 for blood pressure of 114/63, on 7/16/2025 for blood pressure of 129/62, and on 7/18/2025 for blood pressure of 124/62. During an interview on 7/23/2025 at 7:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the documentation indicated that the medication was administered outside parameters for the above referenced dates. 2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory services as per physician order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident #39). Findings include: During an observation on 7/20/2025 at 10:05 AM, Resident #39's nebulizer mask was lying on the bedside table not covered and dated 7/19/2025. Resident #39 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (NC) at 4 liters per minute. There was no padding or ear cushions noted on the NC tubing for skin protection (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 7/20/2025 at 10:05 AM, Resident #39 stated, I receive my nebulizer treatments randomly. I received my treatments last week. My oxygen varies from 2 liter to 4 liters. I do not touch the regulator. Sometime the cushion is on the tubing and other times when the tubing is changed, the cushion is not there. During an observation on 7/21/2025 at 9:36 AM, Resident #39's nebulizer mask was lying on the bedside table not covered and dated 7/19/2025. Resident #39 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula (NC) at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis. Findings include: During an observation on 7/20/2025 at 9:00 AM, the posted nurse staffing information was dated 7/18/2025 (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 7/21/2025 at 9:00 AM, the Administrator stated, Upon my arrival to the facility, I noticed the posting was not updated. The expectation is for the staffing to be posted daily. The Staffing Coordinator is responsible on Friday before leaving to print the reports for the weekend to include Monday.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing high-contact care to the residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for intravenous medication administration (Resident #159) to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: During an observation on 7/22/2025 at 9:00 AM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), entered Resident #159's room, which had a signage for enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) on the door indicating the providers and staff must wear gloves and a gown for the high-contact resident care activities such as devise care or use including central line. Staff C donned gloves. Staff C did not wear a gown. Staff C primed the peripherally inserted catheter central catheter (PICC) line on the resident's upper right arm and set the intravenous (IV) pump. Staff C proceeded to connect the PICC line to the IV medication and began to administer Vancomycin. During an interview on 7/22/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician was immediately informed of an accident that resulted in injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident #1. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's health record documented an appointment to see the cardiologist on 7/15/2024. Review of Resident #1's Emergency Department documentation dated 7/15/2024 showed the resident was in a wheelchair in a transfer vehicle and struck the left side of her face. CT (Computed Tomography) of head demonstrated a zygoma (cheekbone) fracture. The resident was anticoagulated but had no intracranial hemorrhage. Minimal blood in the sinus was noted and the resident had no signs of entrapment. During an interview on 12/6/2024 at 11:07 AM, the Administrator stated, I completed a thorough investigation of this incident on 7/16/2024 after the transport van incident, with [Resident #1's name] on 7/15/2024. I interviewed her twice on 7/16/2024 and [Resident #1's name] stated that the van driver…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration between residents and failed to ensure resident care reusable items were cleaned and disinfected to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: During an observation on 4/2/2024 at 8:33 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical nurse (LPN) started preparing medications for Resident #8 without performing hand hygiene. During obtaining medication from the medication cart for Resident #8, Staff A stopped and locked the medication cart and entered the common room to assist Resident #36 with pencils and a coloring book. Staff A, then, returned to the locked medication cart and retrieved additional 8:00 AM medications for Resident #8. Staff A proceeded to Resident #8's room and administered the medications. Staff A did not perform hand hygiene. Staff A proceeded to the medication cart and started preparing medications for Resident #107. Staff A administered the medications for Resident #107 and did not perform hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received as needed narcotic pain medication as per physician order for 2 of 5 reviewed residents, Residents #9 and #15. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, fracture of neck of left femur, osteoarthritis, dementia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #9's physician order dated 3/21/2024 read, Oxycodone HCl [hydrochloride] oral tablet 5 mg [milligram] (Oxycodone HCl), Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain 6-10. Review of Resident #9's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March and April 2024 showed the resident received Oxycodone 5 mg on 3/21/2024 (pain level 5), 3/22/2024 (pain level 5), 3/23/2024 (pain level 5), 3/26/2024 (pain level 5), 3/30/2024 (pain level 5), 4/1/2024 (pain level 5), 4/3/2024 (pain level 5). Review of Resident #9's care plan dated 2/1/2024 read,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for intravenous infusion, Residents #103 and# 176. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #103's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, Methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, unspecified dementia, and bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip. During an observation on 4/1/2024 at 9:57 AM, Resident #103 had a transparent dressing on his left upper arm, covering Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line, which was dated 3/22/2024. Review of Resident #103's physician order dated 3/18/2024 read, IV [Intravenous]: Central Line- PICC Line: Change transparent dressing every day shift every Wed [Wednesday] for preventative care. Review of Resident #103's Treatment Administration Record for March 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 3 residents sampled for discharge review, Resident #115. Findings include: Review of Resident #115's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessment and Care Screening Nursing Home Discharge (BD) Item Set dated 9/15/2022, reads, Section A. Identification Information. A0310. Type of Assessment . F. Entry/discharge reporting: 10. Discharge assessment- return not anticipated. A1800. Entered From: 03. Acute hospital. A1900. admission Date (Date this episode of care in this facility began): 08/30/2022. A2000. discharge date : [DATE]. A2100. Discharge Status: 03. Acute Hospital. Review of Resident #115's Discharge Planning Review dated 9/15/2022 reads, 7. Where resident discharged to at time of discharge: a. Private residence. Revie of Social Service Note dated 9/13/22 reads, [Family Member's name and Resident #115's name] want to discharge to VA hospital to treat his cancer. requested for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received wound care services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 sampled residents with pressure ulcers, Resident #8. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical records revealed the resident wat admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic diastolic heart failure, dehydration, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, anemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, essential hypertension, morbid obesity due to excess calories, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, restless leg syndrome, generalized edema, cystocele, and myocardial infraction type 2. Review of physician orders dated 11/30/2022 for Resident #8 reads, Wound Care: Coccyx shear, apply calmaceptine and cover with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in 2 of 6 medication carts reviewed. Findings include: During an observation of medication cart #2 on [DATE] at 9:58 AM with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), there was a bottle of Alphagan P Solution 0.15% expired on [DATE] and a Levemir insulin pen with expiration date of [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:59 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated, Alphagan Solution 0.15% is expired and Levemir insulin pen not sure if it has been labeled incorrectly. During an observation of medication cart #3 on [DATE] at 10:09 AM with Staff C, LPN, there was a Humalog insulin with no opened or expiration dates. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:10 AM, Staff C, LPN, stated, Not sure why it is not labeled. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:58 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, Medication in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SUMMIT CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.3+1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Hawthorne Center For Rehabilitation And Healing OfOcala, FL 1 of 5Valencia Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterLakeland, FL 2 of 5Northbrook Center For Rehabilitation And HealingBrooksville, FL 2 of 5Palatka Center For Rehabilitation And HealingPalatka, FL 2 of 5Scott Lake Health And Rehabilitation CenterLakeland, FL 2 of 5Springs At Boca Ciega BaySouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Springs At Lake Pointe WoodsSarasota, FL 3 of 5Lake Bennet Center For Rehabilitation & HealingOcoee, FL 3 of 5Seven Hills Health & Rehabilitation CenterTallahassee, FL 3 of 5Timberridge Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 3 of 5Ybor City Center For Rehabilitation And HealingTampa, FL 4 of 5Hawthorne Center For Rehabilitation And Healing OfBrandon, FL 4 of 5Lakeside Center For Rehabilitation And HealingJacksonville, FL 4 of 5Sandy Ridge Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMilton, FL 4 of 5Santa Rosa Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMilton, FL 4 of 5Surrey Place Healthcare And RehabilitationBradenton, FL 4 of 5Tampa Lakes Health And Rehabilitation CenterLutz, FL 5 of 5Century Center For Rehabilitation And HealingCentury, FL 5 of 5Hawthorne Center For Rehab & Healing Of SarasotaSarasota, FL 5 of 5Madison Health And Rehabilitation CenterMadison, FL 5 of 5North Bank Center For Rehabilitation And HealingJacksonville, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIAMOND RIDGE SNF OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST45%since 08/02/2023
DAVIS, ALANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR25%since 01/01/2014
MITCHELL, JOSEPHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 06/01/2002
CH SUMMIT CARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
SEAM NY 2020 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/04/2023
SK SUMMIT CARE II HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
SUMMIT CARE GROUP II OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/02/2023
MCMANUS, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/03/2023
SUMMIT CARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2023
HENLEY, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/26/2021
VILLACASTIN, ALEXIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 50%Medicare 21%Other / private 29%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,780per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$357per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105657. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next