No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lake Bennet Center For Rehabilitation & Healing

1091 Kelton Ave, Ocoee, FL 34761 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (407) 523-0300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations$74,744 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $74,744 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1151 Blackwood Ave · (321) 234-8900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10500 W Colonial Dr · (407) 877-6910 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10500 W Colonial Dr · (407) 902-3983 · Call to confirm hours
Park
401 E Geneva St · (407) 877-5803 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.8%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%2.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.1%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.4%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.8%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.4%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.2%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.642.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.721.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 311 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 160 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.0%CMS range 50.1–60.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 8.4–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 5.0–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
24.2%
Total nursing turnover
53.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-07)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility neglected to ensure nurses implemented physician's orders for diagnostic testing, failed to notify the physician of any changes of status including refusal of care, and neglected to ensure the resident received the provision of necessary care and services; additionally, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for possible neglect for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for neglect, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#1). On [DATE], resident #1 was admitted to the facility from the hospital. On [DATE], the resident was re-hospitalized and required mechanical ventilation (life support to breathe) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to critically low blood pressure and septic shock from a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Sepsis is when your body's immune system has a dangerous response to an infection. It is a medical emergency that can be caused by many different kinds of infections. The quicker you receive treatment, the better your outcome will be. Septic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical well-being by failing to ensure nurses implemented physician's orders for diagnostic testing, notified the physician, and ensured provision of necessary care and services for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Quality of Care, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#1). The facility failed to implement a physician's order for Urinalysis with Culture and Sensitivity (UA/CS) for resident #1, failed to notify the physician that the ordered diagnostic test was not completed, and failed to follow up on the missing laboratory result. Additionally, the physician/provider did not recognize or act upon the absence of the test result. Due to these combined failures in care coordination, resident #1's Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) went undiagnosed and untreated, leading to the development of septic shock, a life-threatening condition. This failure to provide necessary care and services placed the resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishes were washed at the appropriate temperature, with regard to the dish machine's data plate and manufacturer's instructions. Findings: On 08/04/2025 at 9:57 AM, during kitchen tour observation, Dietary Aide J was observed putting a dish rack containing dishes into the dish machine while [NAME] L removed items from the dish machine area and placed them with other eating items in the kitchen. The temperature dial on the dish machine showed temperature to be 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 8/04/2025 at 10:03 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated the dish machine was a low temperature machine and should wash at 120 degrees F or higher. She verified the temperature gauge registered at 110 degrees F and not 120 degrees F as noted on the data plate on the machine. She stated a repairman had been there the previous Friday and machine read 120 degrees F at that time. The CDM ran a rack through the machine again and the temperature gauge did not move past 110 degrees F. Dietary Aide J stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer blood pressure medication according to physician ordered parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#63).Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, heart valve insufficiency, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 7/29/25 revealed resident 63 had an active diagnosis of hypertension. Review of the Order Summary Report for August 2025 revealed resident #63 had a physician order dated 7/21/25 for Metoprolol Tartrate 12.5 milligrams to be given two times a day for beta-blocker. The order included parameters to hold the medication if resident #63's heart rate was less than 55 beats per minute or her Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) was less than 120. Metoprolol is a beta-blocker medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized Comprehensive Care Plan to include an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#3). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #3, an [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. She had diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture of thoracic (mid-spine) and lumbar (lower spine) vertebrae, and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Comprehensive admission 5-day Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/13/24 noted during the look back periods, resident #3 scored 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status that indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident required staff assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and the use of an indwelling urinary catheter appliance. During the 7-day look back period, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for a bruise of unknown origin for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents, out of a total sample of 39 residents, (#50). Findings: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, mixed anxiety disorders, long-term use of anticoagulants and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/12/23 revealed resident #50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. Resident required assistance with activities of daily living and used a wheelchair for mobility. A weekly skin assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident #50 had a discoloration on her left wrist. Review of resident #50's electronic medical record revealed a nursing progress note dated 12/30/22 which indicated resident #50 had a discolored area to her left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and/or revise the comprehensive fall care plan to reflect accurate, appropriate, and individualized interventions related to falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls of a total sample of 39 residents (#37). Findings: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia, depression, anxiety, and long-term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 10/27/23 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 01/15 which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment, she was dependent on staff for her daily care, and she used a wheelchair for mobility. On 11/30/23 at 10:42 AM, resident #37's falls were reviewed with the Risk Manager (RM) and revealed the following information: On 1/16/23 at 2:40 PM, resident#37 was found on the floor in her room. The resident complained of pain in ribs and hips.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent avoidable falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls out of a total sample of 39 residents, (#83). Findings: Review of medical record revealed resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis of the right knee, and venous insufficiency. Review of physician note dated 12/7/22 at 9:11 PM, showed resident #83 had a history of falls. Review of the physician orders from December 2022 to November of 2023 showed an order for a silent bed alarm and resident #83 received Apixaban 2.5 mg by mouth twice a day, a medication that decreases the body's ability to clot (2023, December 9), retrieved December 1, 2023, from https://www.webmd.com/dvt/anticoagulant. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for resident #83, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/11/23, revealed a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate and appropriate care and services by not following the physician order for a resident who received gastric tube (GT) feedings for 1 of 3 resident reviewed out of a total of 39 sample residents, (#107). Findings: Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include gastrostomy, severe protein calorie malnutrition, surgical aftercare of the digestive system, and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase. The resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/18/23 noted the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which is moderately impaired. She requires dependent to maximal care of staff for activities of daily living and requires a tube feeding to meet her nutritional needs due to loss of liquids when eating, coughing, choking during meals, pain, and difficulty with swallowing. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accuracy of documentation in the electronic health record for changing of the enteral tube tubing, water bag, and water bag tubing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for documentation accuracy of tube feedings, out of a total sample of 39 residents (#107). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included surgical aftercare digestive system, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, attention to gastrostomy and anarthria. Further review of the medical record showed a Physician Order dated 9/14/23 for an Enteral Feed Order with every night shift to change enteral feeding syringe, storage container, and tubing daily. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 11/25/23 at 11:00 PM, showed documentation signature initials for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T and on 11/26/23 at 11:00 PM, a documentation signature initials for LPN U as having changed Resident #107 enteral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow plan of care for splint application for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for mobility of a total sample of 44 residents, (#104, #11). Findings: 1. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, quadriplegia and osteoporosis. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with reference date 01/10/22 revealed resident #104 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of 1 person for bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene and bathing. She was totally dependent on 1 staff for toilet use. A physician order dated 7/20/21 read Apply resting hand splint to right hand, ON in AM and OFF in PM as tolerated. Monitor for pain, discomfort, hand hygiene, splint hygiene, nail care and skin integrity every shift. A care plan initiated on 10/02/20, and revised on 12/24/21 noted resident #104 had self-care performance deficit which required assistance with bed mobility, toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify multiple bruises on a resident's neck/chest for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions out of a total sample of 44 residents, (#65). Findings: Review of resident #65's medical record documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, anemia and atrial fibrillation with long-term use of anticoagulants. Observations conducted on 02/14/22 at 2:30 PM, 02/15/22 at 5:22 PM, 02/16/22 at 9:50 AM, 1:35 PM, and 5:27 PM and on 02/17/22 at 10:12 AM, noted the resident had multiple (7) circular purple/red bruises on her right upper chest/neck area. The resident was not able to verbalize how she got the bruises but indicated she did not have any pain at the site. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented she had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living, (ADL) limited assistance with personal hygiene and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for tube feedings (TF) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for tube feedings of a total sample of 44 residents, (#90). Findings: Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with his most recent readmission on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, dementia, aphasia, dysphagia emphysema, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, depression, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the resident's clinical records showed a physician's order dated 2/01/22 which read, every night shift Enteral: Closed system container- Change feeding administration set with each new bottle; label the formula container, syringe, and administration set with resident's name, date, time, and nurse's initials. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date of 1/02/22 indicated the resident was rarely/never understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) therapy was administered per the physician's order for 1 of 3 residents (#51) and failed to obtain physician orders for O2 therapy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, (#90) of a total sample of 44 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission of 2/12/22. Her diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic diastolic (Congestive) heart failure, and Coronavirus Disease 2019. The resident's physician orders dated 2/13/22 noted oxygen at 2 Liters via nasal cannula (N/C) continuously. The resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date of 12/20/21 revealed the resident's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, and indicated the resident used O2. Observations on 2/14/22 at 1:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was not left at the bedside unattended for 1 of 17 residents on the 200 unit, out of a total sample of 44 residents, (#124). Findings: Resident #124 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastric ulcer, diverticulosis and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment dated [DATE] which indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a score of 15/15. Review of the physician orders for February 2022 revealed resident #124 had an order for Carafate (Sucralfate) Tablet 1 gram (gm) to be given three times a day for stomach acid. Sucralfate is a prescription medication used to treat ulcers by sticking to the ulcer sites and protecting them from acids, enzymes and bile salts (retrieved on 2/18/22 from www.drugs.com). On 2/16/22 at 9:28 AM, resident #124 was observed sitting on the edge of her bed with her overbed table in front…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was obtained for advanced directive/code status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives of a total sample of 44 residents, (#363). Findings: Review of resident #363's medical record documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of thoracic fracture, and and spinal stenosis lumbar region. On 02/15/22 at 11:24 AM, a review of the resident's medical record did not reveal an order for advanced directive/Code Status. 02/15/22 at 1:33 PM, a review the Advance Directives book for the 100 hall revealed no physician order for resident #363's code status, Review of the Medical Certification For Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form (3008) from the hospital documented the resident's wishes for full code status. Review of the Social Service note dated 02/10/22 at 3:06 PM, noted the resident wishes for full code. On 02/16/22 at 9:30 AM, the North Wing Unit Manager (UM) stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$74,744 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $74,744 — penalty dated 2025-05-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SUMMIT CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Hawthorne Center For Rehabilitation And Healing OfOcala, FL 1 of 5Valencia Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterLakeland, FL 2 of 5Northbrook Center For Rehabilitation And HealingBrooksville, FL 2 of 5Palatka Center For Rehabilitation And HealingPalatka, FL 2 of 5Scott Lake Health And Rehabilitation CenterLakeland, FL 2 of 5Springs At Boca Ciega BaySouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Springs At Lake Pointe WoodsSarasota, FL 3 of 5Seven Hills Health & Rehabilitation CenterTallahassee, FL 3 of 5Timberridge Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 3 of 5Ybor City Center For Rehabilitation And HealingTampa, FL 4 of 5Hawthorne Center For Rehabilitation And Healing OfBrandon, FL 4 of 5Lakeside Center For Rehabilitation And HealingJacksonville, FL 4 of 5Sandy Ridge Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMilton, FL 4 of 5Santa Rosa Center For Rehabilitation And HealingMilton, FL 4 of 5Surrey Place Healthcare And RehabilitationBradenton, FL 4 of 5Tampa Lakes Health And Rehabilitation CenterLutz, FL 5 of 5Century Center For Rehabilitation And HealingCentury, FL 5 of 5Diamond Ridge Health And Rehabilitation CenterLecanto, FL 5 of 5Hawthorne Center For Rehab & Healing Of SarasotaSarasota, FL 5 of 5Madison Health And Rehabilitation CenterMadison, FL 5 of 5North Bank Center For Rehabilitation And HealingJacksonville, FL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAKE BENNET SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/08/2021
MUSSARI, ADRIAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2022

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 18%Other / private 19%

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,472per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105967. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next