Aliya Of Crestwood
13259 South Central Avenue, Crestwood, IL 60418 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 193 certified beds · (708) 597-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $80,372 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.7% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 93.8% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.9% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.2% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.6% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.3% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.3% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.31 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.66 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 168 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.7%CMS range 37.6–52.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.8–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.4–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 193 beds and averages 137.9 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-06-30 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the resident's plan of care and accepted standards of practice for ostomy care by failing to monitor, measure, and document ileostomy output for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for ostomy care and services. This failure resulted in R1 having significant abdominal pain, being transported to the hospital, and diagnosed with a bowel obstruction.Findings include: R1's facility sheet shows diagnoses of colostomy status. R1's MDS dated [DATE] section H for bowel and bladder shows appliances- ostomy, bowel incontinence shows nine (9) Not rated, resident had an ostomy or did not have a bowel movement for the entire 7 days.R1's care plan for R1 has potential risk for complications r/t (related to) altered elimination device for (bowel/bladder) elimination, as evidence by having colostomy, date initiated 5/1/2026. R1 will remain free from complication r/t device for altered elimination through next review. Interventions- check elimination device during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their facility policies and protocols, failed to implement fall care plan interventions failed to follow basic life support/CPR protocol, failed to provide sufficient rounding/supervision to ensure resident's needs were met, and failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice needed for one resident that required life sustaining services after experiencing a fall. The facility also failed to provide a working call light for one (R25) resident. These failures affected two (R4 and R25) of six residents reviewed for quality of care. These failures resulted in R4 experiencing an unwitnessed fall and sustaining life-threatening injuries and subsequence death due to left frontal scalp/periorbital hematoma, acute L1 anterior vertebral body fracture with mild retropulsion, acute fracture along anterior/superior end plate at C7 with widening of the anterior C7-T1 disk space and widening of C7-T1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their Medication Administration Policy by not notifying the physician that a resident's anti-seizure medications were not available in a timely manner. This failure resulted in R10 having a seizure the next morning and being sent out to the hospital. This failure affected 1 (R10) of 3 residents reviewed for Quality of Care/Treatment.Findings include: On 2/18/2026 at 3:09PM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) stated pharmacy notified the DON the delivery hours for medication had a cut off time after 4:00PM on 12/24/2025 due to the holiday. V2 stated the facility nurses use the (medication dispensing system) machine to retrieve medications that have not been delivered from the pharmacy and are given to the residents as ordered by the doctor. V2 states if the medication is not available in the (medication dispensing system) machine the nurse should call and notify the doctor and family, but R10's nurse did not notify V35. V2 stated Dilantin was the only anti-seizure medication in (medication dispensing system)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their interventions of ensuring residents were adequately supervised who were identified as high risk for falls when left unattended, failed to modify fall prevention interventions post fall and failed to ensure a resident who is at high risk for falls whom repeatedly exhibited unsafe behaviors when in a reclining chair, was safely positioned in a reclining chair and adequately supervised during care. This failure applies to three of three (R1, R2 and R3) residents reviewed for accidents and resulted in R1 sustaining a facial fracture and intracranial hemorrhage from a fall. Findings include: 1. R1 is a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnoses history of Dementia, Insomnia, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and a history of falling who was admitted to the facility [DATE]. R1's Functional Abilities Minimum Data Sets dated 07/09/2024, 10/09/2024, 01/07/2025, and 03/30/2025 document she is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the plan of care and provide three persons assist with activities of daily living care during bed mobility for a dependent resident. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for avoidable accidents. This failure resulted in R1 falling out of bed when provided one person assist, V1 pushed the linen under R1's body, pushing R1 out of bed. R1 complained of pain, sent to the hospital diagnosed with non-displaced left, 11th rib fracture. Findings include: R1 face sheet shows diagnosis of generalized osteoarthritis, repeated falls, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, adult failure to thrive, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, unspecified lack of coordination, venous insufficiency, chronic pain, vitamin D deficiency. R1 MDS dated [DATE] section for cognitive pattern shows score of 15 (cognitively intact), section GG for functional status shows mobility-roll from left to right- 01 is entered (01-dependent, helper does all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize two persons assist for bed mobility (R1), failed to utilize a gait belt to assist with transfers (R18), failed to ensure wheelchair leg supports were in place during transport (R9), and failed implement an effective plan to prevent or reduce the risk of falling with injury for a resident identified to be at risk for falling out of bed (R13). This affected (R1, R9, 18, and R13) reviewed for safety during care and fall prevention interventions on the sample list of 21. This failure resulted in R1 rolling off the bed onto the floor while staff was providing care. R1 sustained an impacted/displaced fracture to the left upper arm with abrasion to the left knee and toe. R9 sustained a closed nondisplaced fracture of the metatarsal bone of the right foot while being transported in the wheelchair by staff, and R13 being involved in an unwitnessed fall incident sustaining a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficiency requires two deficient practice statements. 1. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from falls by not implementing interventions according to the resident centered care plans and facility protocols for supervision. These failures applied to three of three (R47, R90, and R92) residents reviewed for accidents and supervision and resulted in R90 experiencing repeated falls; R92 requiring three staples to the back of the head as a result of a head injury from a fall; and R47 sustaining a right femoral neck fracture as a result of a fall. 2. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident with known wandering behaviors and failed to prevent a resident from to wandering into another resident's room and relieving himself. This failure applied to two (R15 and R22) of two residents reviewed for supervision. Findings include: 1.A. R47 is an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to staff the facility with a sufficient number of licensed nurses and nursing assistants to meet residents' needs, failed to staff the facility in accordance with the staffing needs/plan identified within the facility assessment, and failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to answer call light when one resident (R6) used the call light device to obtain help for his roommate (R4). The lack of sufficient staffing resulted in R4 self-ambulating, falling and experiencing a delay in care resulting in R4 sustaining major injuries. These failures affected one (R4) of seven residents reviewed for staffing and have the potential to affect all 145 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility census ([DATE]) document 145 residents reside in the facility. Record review for facility's Daily Assignment Sheet, date [DATE] night shift (R4's fall), documents that V9 (Registered Nurse/RN), V12 (Registered Nurse/RN), V10 (Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's administration and quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) committee failed to make good faith attempts to correct known quality issues after a QAPI meeting was held in response to one resident's (R4) death, failed to disclose/provide QAPI committee records to the state survey agency to evaluate compliance with related QAPI regulations, failed to follow the facility's QAPI plan. These failures have the potential to affect all 145 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: Facility census ([DATE]) documents 145 residents reside in the facility. R4's FRI (facility reported incident), dated [DATE], documents, in part, (R4) is incontinent of bowel and bladder; he (R4) has impaired mobility and requires assistance with ADL (activities of daily) care and transfers as W/C (wheelchair) is the primary source of transportation. (R4) was observed laying on the floor on his left side in front of the dresser, head towards the window,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) committee's monitoring of systemic compliance identified deficient practices with quality of care, failed to identify systemic deficient practices with the facility's malfunctioning call light system, failed to identify systemic deficient practices with insufficient staffing, failed to identify systemically deficient practices regarding root cause analysis of incident investigation/reporting. Additionally, the facility's quality assurance processes failed to correct repeated history of non-compliance regarding professional standards of care, quality of care, functioning call lights, and infection control. These failures affect all 145 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: Facility census (5/18/2026) documents 145 residents reside in the facility. 1) Record review of CMS-2567 (survey exit date 4/23/2026) documents the facility was cited at F0919 for having a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to respect the resident's right of confidentiality of their personal health information, failed to dispose of personal health information in a manner that renders the information unreadable, indecipherable and otherwise unreconstructable. This failure affected five (R14, R16, R17, R18, and R19) residents in a sample of five reviewed during medication administration and has the potential to affect all 34 residents that reside in the unit 2 assignment. Findings include: R14's face sheet documents R14 is a [AGE] year-old resident with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, cardiomegaly, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atopic dermatitis, spinal stenosis, chronic diastolic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism, fibromyalgia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. On 5/20/2026 at 9:30 AM, observed medication pass with V35 (Licensed Practical Nurse). V35 withdrew R14's medications from the cart.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff were trained properly on CPR; failed to ensure staff initiated appropriate emergency response for a resident; failed to promptly activate Emergency Medical Services (EMS)/911 upon discovering an unresponsive resident; failed to accurately assess for the presence or absence of a pulse; and failed to perform uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for one (R4) of seven residents reviewed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. These facility failures resulted in R4 not receiving uninterrupted CPR and emergency care prior to EMS arrival and has the potential to affect all 91 full code residents residing in the facility.Findings include: Record review of facility document untitled, dated [DATE], documents 91 full code residents residing at the facility. R4's face sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and documents the following diagnoses: encephalopathy, generalized muscle weakness, muscle wasting/atrophy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately sanitize reusable durable medical equipment between patient use, failed to perform hand hygiene before preparing medications for administration and failed to have accurate signage posted for isolation precautions (R17), These failures affected four residents (R14, R17. R18 and R19) and has the potential to affect all 34 residents who receive medications from unit one medication cart. Findings include: Facility census report (5/21/2026) documents 19 residents receive routine blood pressure monitoring. R14's face sheet documents R14 is a [AGE] year-old resident with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, cardiomegaly, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atopic dermatitis, spinal stenosis, chronic diastolic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism, fibromyalgia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. On 5/20/2026 at 9:30 AM, began observing V35 complete medication pass. Observed V35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to administer subcutaneous injections in accordance with the facility's procedure for subcutaneous injections and in accordance with professional standards for subcutaneous injections. This failure affected one (R16) in a sample of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R16's face sheet documents R16 is a [AGE] year-old resident with prior diagnoses, including but not limited to: systemic lupus erythematosus, osteomyelitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anemia in chronic kidney disease, obesity, sickle cell disease, chronic kidney disease, acquired absence of left and right legs, and osteoarthritis. R16's minimum data set (4/13/2026) documents in part a brief interview of mental status summary score of 13, indicating R16 is cognitively intact. R16's care plan (4/23/2025) identifies R16 has renal failure due to chronic kidney disease, has alterations in hematological status related to anemia and is at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility failed to follow their medication administration policy and failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. These failures affected one (R1) in a sample of six residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:R1's face sheet documents an admission date of 11/24/25 and diagnoses that include but are not limited to abnormalities of gait, unsteadiness on feet, muscle wasting and atrophy, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, and low back pain.R1's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, dated 3/2/26, is 15 which indicates R1 is cognitively intact.R1 is a closed record. R1 is currently admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of chest pain.R1's progress note, dated 5/16/ 26, documents, in part, Called (Hospital) ER (emergency room) for update on resident (R1), he (R1) was admitted with dx (diagnosis) of chest pain.Record review of R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated May 4, 2026, documents that V29 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) administered R1's following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient operating call light system; and failed to ensure two resident's (R17 and R25) call lights were working properly. These failures affected two (R17 and R25) of 7 residents reviewed for call lights but have the potential to affect 145 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 5/19/26 at 11:06am, V12 (Registered Nurse/RN) said in part, Call lights sound like an AI voice but disconnects cause of internet or something and most of the time there is no sound for the call lights. If that's not working, you just gotta keep monitoring your lights. Honestly, the sound for the call lights doesn't work often. On 5/20/2026 11:05 AM, V20 (Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse) affirmed in part V20 is the unit supervisor for unit two. V20 affirmed there is no panel or other system that notifies staff of a call light being activated other than a light outside the resident's door. V20 denied knowledge of any system the facility uses to track call light response times or rounding. On 5/20/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff ordered and administered medications to a newly admitted resident (R156); failed to document the administration of medications immediately following administration for 12 (R6, R25, R52, R61, R87, R106, R115, R120, R126, R131, R139, and R142) residents. These failures affected 13 residents reviewed in a sample of 76 residents. Findings include: 1) R6's Medication Admin Audit Report, dated 4/22/26, documents that on 4/08/26, R6's medications that were due for 9:00am: Docusate Sodium, Hydroxyzine HCl, Levetiracetam, Furosemide, Loratadine, Gabapentin, Aspirin, Calcium, Nabumetone, Polyethylene Glycol, Magnesium Oxide, and Vitamin C were administered at 11:33am (one hour and 33 minutes late). R25's Medication Admin Audit Report, dated 4/22/26, documents that on 4/08/26, R25's medication, Cetirizine, that was due for 8:00am was given at 2:15pm (5 hours and 15 minutes late) and R25's medication, Lexapro, that was due for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement individualized fall prevention intervention for a resident identified at risk for falls, failed to prevent falls during provision of ADL (activities of daily living) care, and failed to ensure oxygen tanks were secured in the storage room. These failures affected two (R4 and R8) residents and have the potential to affect all 17 residents in Unit C Wing. Findings include: 1) On 04/20/2026 at 1:33pm, R8 stated the CNA (who was later identified as V40 – CNA) was changing him and she put him on his side facing the window and she was pushing something on his side and the next thing he knew he was on the floor, naked. R8 stated (V40) left him for about 35minutes. She came back with other staff (who was later identified as V17 – CNA, V25 (Licensed Practical Nurse), and V41 CNA) and they picked him up on the floor. R8 stated he informed (V16 – Licensed Practical Nurse) the next day that he fell; and she told him he needed to go the hospital. On 04/22/2026 at 9:46am, V40 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff ordered and administered medications to a newly admitted resident (R156) and failed to ensure that a witnessed fall was documented in the resident's electronic health record (R8). R156 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] between 1:30 and 2:00PM and did not receive any medications till the morning of 4/21/2026. These failures affected two (R8 and R156) of two residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1.R156 is [AGE] years old admitted to the facility on [DATE], face sheet listed the following past medical history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypokalemia, alcohol abuse with withdrawal, rheumatoid arthritis, tobacco abuse counseling, hypothyroidism, noninfective gastroenteritis, chest pain, etc. admission evaluation dated 4/20/2026 documented that R156 is alert and oriented x3, can make needs known and communicate with a clear speech. After visit summary dated 4/20/2026, scanned in resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures to ensure residents received showers in accordance with professional standards of practice. This failure applies to one (R4) of four residents reviewed for receiving showers in the facility. Findings include: R4 is [AGE] years old, female, admitted to the facility 08/14/2025, diagnoses including but not limited to: Dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral ischemia, and gait and mobility abnormality. R4's (MDS) Minimal Data Set assessment of 08/21/2025, section C, the BIMS (Brief Interviewed Mental status) score was 10/15, which means moderately impaired cognitively. R4's MDS of 8/21/2025, GG section for Shower/bathe self, R4 requires Substantial/maximal assistance - Helper does more than half the effort. The helper lifts or holds the trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort.On 9/29/2025 at 1:00 PM, R4's family member said, I went on vacation in the middle of the month, and when I came back to visit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their medication administration policy by not administering scheduled pain medication within the hour timeframe as ordered and failed to notify the physician of the missed dose for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration in a total sample of four.R1 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: idiopathic neuropathy, chronic pain syndrome, and venous insufficiency.On 8/5/25 at 3:08PM, R1 said on 7/19/2025 she did not receive the scheduled morning medications at any time during the day shift (7:00 AM - 3:00 PM). R1 said the day shift nurse (V4) did not come into R1's room the whole shift. R1 stated that V4 did not check vitals and did not ask R1 for her pain level. R1 said the CNA (V10) had gotten R1 up from bed around 10:30 AM that morning. R1 said her family members came to visit her from 12PM to 3:00 PM. R1 said at approximately 3:00 PM she asked the evening nurse why she hadn't received her day time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to ensure that 8 of 25 residents (R8, R10, R11, R13, R14, R16, R17, R18) remained free from significant medication errors. Findings include:1. R10’s POS (Physician Order Sheets) include Escitalopram (Antidepressant) 20mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet one time a day. Special instruction: take with 10mg tablet for total dose of 30mg daily (start date: 11/21/24). On 7/15/25 at 8:30am, V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) dispensed (1) 20mg (milligrams) Escitalopram tablet in R10’s medication cup (with scheduled 8am medications) and affirmed she was prepared to administer them however the prescribed dose is 30mg. Surveyor inquired what R10’s Escitalopram order states V11 accessed R10’s EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) and stated, “Escitalopram 20 milligrams give 1 tablet 1 time a day and take with a 10-milligram tablet.” Surveyor inquired about R10’s Escitalopram prescribed dose V11 responded “30 milligrams.” R10’s Escitalopram 20 milligram tablet (not 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that medication orders received include a prescribed dose, and failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%. There were 4 medication errors out of 37 opportunities, resulting in a 10.81% medication error rate. Three of three residents (R7, R10, R12) in the medication administration sample were affected. Findings include:1.R10's POS (Physician Order Sheets) include Escitalopram 20mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet one time a day. Special instruction: take with 10mg tablet for total dose of 30mg daily (start date: 11/21/24).On 7/15/25 at 8:30am, V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) dispensed (1) 20mg Escitalopram tablet in R10's medication cup (with scheduled 8am medications) and affirmed she was prepared to administer them however R10's prescribed Escitalopram dose is 30mg. Surveyor inquired how much Escitalopram was dispensed in R10's medication cup V11 checked the single dose package and affirmed it was 20mg. Surveyor inquired what R10's Escitalopram order states…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care timely for a resident who was identified as dependent on staff. This affected one of three residents (R2) reviewed for incontinence care. Findings Include: R2's minimal dated set (MDS) section C brief interview for mental status dated 6/27/25 documents: a score of fifteen which indicates cognitively intact. Section H (bowel/bladder) dated 6/30/25 documents: frequently incontinence. Section GG (functional ability) documents: toileting- dependent. R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents: roll left and right. The ability to roll from lying on back to left and right side and return to lying on back ln the bed documents substantial/maximal assistance. On 7/1/25 at 10:48pm, R2 who was assessed to be alert and oriented to person, place and time said, she was left soiled and saturated with urine for 3.5 hours on one occasion and over two hours on another. R2 said, being left in saturated urine made her feel stressed, frustrated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and provide a written notice of room change with and explanation of the room change for one of one resident (R2) reviewed for written room change notice. Findings include: On 2/27/25 at 10:39am V1 (R2's sister/ POA-Power of Attorney) said the facility did not discuss R2's room change with her. V1 said she did not get a copy of the room change notice. On 2/27/25 at 4:40pm request was made to V4 (Director of Nursing) V5 (Administrator) and V7 (Social Service) to review the written notice of room change for R2. On 2/28/25 upon exit of this survey V5 (Administrator), V4 (Director of Nursing), and V7 (Social Worker) did not present a copy of the written notice of room change and explanation of room change for R2, the facility did not present documentation denoting a written notice was given to R2's family/poa/ resident representative Facility policy dated 11/1/2023 denotes in-part room change/transfer within facility. To assure residents and/ or their representatives are appropriately notified of room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their abuse prevention policy and report an allegation of abuse to the abuse coordinator and or Director of Nursing on 2/21/25 for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for abuse reporting. Findings include: R1 face sheet denotes R1 has diagnosis of dementia. On 2/27/25 at 4:19 pm V3 (Registered Nurse) said V1 (visitor) approached him on 2/21/25 and said that V2 (Certified Nursing aide/CNA) slapped R1 on the knee. V3 said he did not report the allegation to V4 (DON) or V5 (Administrator). On 2/27/25 at 4:25 pm (Director of Nursing) said he was not aware of the allegation of abuse for R1. Facility policy titled abuse prevention dated 3/2022 denotes in-part, internal reporting requirements and identification of allegations. Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper integrity of the facility roof that resulted in ceiling cracks in two residents' rooms and ensure dust free ventilatory outlets in all residents' rooms throughout the facility. This failure has a potential to affect all 131 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 02/18/2025 at 09:45 AM Surveyor was provided with facility census listing 131 residents residing in the facility. On 02/18/25 between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM Surveyor completed initial observations that revealed: - abundant collection of black/dark grey, powder like particles on the ceiling, around and in the ventilatory outlet and smoke detector in room [ROOM NUMBER] - cracked plaster on the ceiling with rusty discoloration in room [ROOM NUMBER], water collection bucket underneath the crack in the ceiling - cracked plaster on the ceiling with rusty discoloration in the bathroom room [ROOM NUMBER] - abundant collection of dark grey/white, powder like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for dietary food storage, cleaning, and hand hygiene practices by not ensuring stored foods were free of contaminated substances, not ensuring stored foods were properly labeled, not ensuring coolers and freezers were clean and free of contaminated items, not ensuring food items not intended for resident use were discarded, and not performing hand hygiene after handling contaminated items. This failure applies to all 123 residents receiving food from the facility. Findings include: On 02/18/2025 at 10:18 AM In the facility's main kitchen observed a strong foul odor in the cooler along with two large boxes of meat with a red substance spilled on them. V26 (Dietary Aide) stated she observed the strong odor, and it could be spoiled food or something spilled and the cooler needs to be cleaned. Observed a container with a burger patty labeled black bean burger partially covered with plastic wrap with no labeled dates. Observed a large box of tomatoes, a large box of lettuce, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the pharmacy policy by not storing unopened Insulin in the medication refrigerator and documenting open date labels for three of three (R439, R127, R82) residents reviewed during medication storage and labeling in the sample of 32. Findings include: On 02/19/2025 at 12:15PM Surveyor conducted an inspection of the 1st floor (Unit 2-C) medication cart. Surveyor observed undated insulin pen medications not labeled opened, and unopened insulin not properly stored in facility/medication refrigerator for two residents: R439 Novolin R Flex Pen 100unit/ML - No open date written on label. Not stored in appropriate facility/medication refrigerator per pharmacy policy for all unopened insulin should be refrigerated. R127 Lispro Kwik Pen 100unit/ML - No open date written on label. Not stored in appropriate facility/medication refrigerator per pharmacy policy for all unopened insulin should be refrigerated. On 02/19/2025 at 12:50PM Surveyor conducted an inspection of the 1st floor (Unit 1-C) medication cart.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its skin prevention policy and notify one resident's (R1) family regarding a new facility acquired wound timely. This affects one of three (R1) resident reviewed for change in condition notification. Findings include: On 1/23/25, V3 (wound care nurse) stated that R1 was at high risk for skin breakdown. V3 stated that R1 developed a facility acquired MASD (moisture associated skin damage) sacral wound due to loose stools, moisture in brief due to sweating, and loose skin (on 12/23/24). V3 stated that the was an overall decline in R1's medical condition. V3 stated that while R1 was in the hospital, R1 was started on dialysis treatments three times a week. V3 stated that since R1 was re-admitted from the hospital, R1's overall condition has declined. V3 stated that on 12/17 she discussed with R1's family that R1's multiple comorbidities and risk factors could cause skin impairments. V3 stated at that time, R1 did not have any skin alterations. V3 stated that on 12/30 V3 did R1's wound care treatment in the presence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its skin care prevention policy and develop a person-centered care plan with interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of developing skin breakdown. This affects one of three residents (R1) reviewed for care plan development. Findings include: On 1/23/25 at 10:00AM, V3 (wound care nurse) stated that R1 was at risk for skin breakdown. V3 stated that R1 developed a facility acquired MASD (moisture associated skin damage) sacral wound due to fragile skin, loose stools, moisture in brief due to sweating, and loose skin. V3 stated that there was an overall decline in R1's medical condition since R1 was re-admitted from hospital stay in November. On 1/23/25 at 12:00PM, V4 CNA (certified nurse aide) stated that R1 is dependent for all ADLs (activities of daily living). On 1/23/25 at 12:35PM, V7 LPN (licensed practical nurse) stated that stated that R1 was able to make slight movements, but not able to reposition self. R1's comprehensive care plan does not note a risk for an alteration in skin integrity or actual skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its tube feeding policy and check the resident's gastrostomy tube for residual prior to administering medications and bolus feeding. This failure affected one resident (R1) out of three residents reviewed for gastrostomy tubes in a sample of 5. Findings include: On 1/22/25 at 4:30PM, this surveyor observed V10 RN (registered nurse) administer medications and bolus feeding for R2. V10 was not observed checking R2's G-tube (gastrostomy tube) for any residual or checking placement prior to administering R2's scheduled medications. V10 was observed administering 150ml (milliliters) of water prior to initiating R2's bolus G-tube feeding. On 1/23/25 at 12:20PM, V6 LPN (licensed practical nurse) stated that the resident's G-tube should be checked for residual before administering medications and bolus feedings via G-tube. On 1/23/25 at 12:35PM, V7 LPN stated that the resident's G-tube should be checked for residual before administering medications and bolus feedings via G-tube. V6 stated that if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its enteral tube medication administration policy and administer water in between each medication administered and administer scheduled medications per physician orders for one resident (R1) out of three reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 5. Findings include: On 1/22/25 at 4:30PM, this surveyor observed V10 RN (registered nurse) prepare R2's medications for administration. V10 crushed R2's medications and placed each medication in a separate medication cup. V10 was observed dissolving each medication in water. V10 administered R2's medications via gastrostomy tube. V10 was not observed flushing the gastrostomy tube with 5-10ml of water in between each medication administered. On 1/22/25 at 4:30PM, V10 stated that R2's omeprazole was not present in the medication cart. V10 did not inform R2 that R2 was not receiving this medication. On 1/23/25 at 9:45AM, R2 complained of his stomach bothering him to V3 LPN (licensed practical nurse). R2 denied nausea or vomiting, but unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor its call light system and answer call lights within a timely manner for four residents (R2, R3, R4, R6) out of six residents reviewed for call light response times. Findings include: On 09/07/2024 at 9:58AM, V13 (R2's Family Member) states he lives in another state but came to visit R2 once V13 was informed that R2's health was declining and R2 was in the process of expiring. V13 states he was located inside of R2's room approximately two weeks ago and R2 appeared to be in pain. V13 states he located R2's call light and pressed it because he is not sure if R2 could use the call light on her own. V13 states he waited 45 minutes for someone to come to R2's room to answer R2's call light. V13 states he waited for so long that he went to the nurses' station to go and find a staff member to help assist R2 with her needs. V13 states he also made V1 (Administrator) aware that he waited a long time for someone to answer R2's call light.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment as ordered by physician for resident who has swollen bilateral feet. The facility also failed to ensure ongoing assessment, identify, document, and obtain physician order for rashes on entire upper back, lateral, medial upper arm, and open wound on upper back This failure affects two (R34 and R90) of three residents in the sample of 22 reviewed for Quality of care. Findings include: 1. On 4/2/24 at 10:20AM, Observed R34 lying on bed wearing socks with noticeable tightness due to bilateral edema. She is alert and responsive with periods of forgetfulness and confusion. She said that her both feet/able has been swollen and it hurts at times. On 4/2/24 at 10:38AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) and V5 (Unit 2 Manager) said that R34 is alert but confused. Both said that she has Dementia. V2 DON provided copies of R34's active medical records including face sheet, physician order sheet and care plan. R34 is re-admitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest management program by not maintaining a clean kitchen dry storage area which resulted in live ants and mice droppings being observed which has the potential to affect all 104 residents that participate in dining services. Findings include: On 11/2/23 at 12:17PM, Kitchen dry storage area was observed with fifteen cylindrical dried small dark brown pieces on top of a flying insect light trap adhered to the middle of the wall. V34 (kitchen manager) confirmed that it was mice droppings and unsure how long it had been there. On 11/3/23 at 2:55PM, V34 (kitchen manager) tour of dry storage room observed multiple large open shelving units, with more than ten small ants crawling along the shelves edge with boxes of powdered sugar and brown sugar bags. In addition, one large clear storage bin with multiple small containers of syrup with more than 10 small ants crawling around the sides and inside of the container. On another shelve there was a large binder of recipes that had ants crawling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the primary care physician of the change of condition for one of one resident (R21) reviewed for change of condition in a sample of 10. Findings include: On 01/11/2024 at 10:30AM during record review, R21's Progress Notes by V21 (nurse practitioner/NP) dated 12/19/2023 indicated R21 was seen and examined with pain of 7/10 on both lower extremities (BLE) especially to the ankle and knee and R21 said that she slipped off her commode and fell with complaint of (c/o) tenderness to touch on the outer lateral ankle which was also swollen. The same progress note indicated that V21 notified the nurse, recommended to administer any needed medication (prn) as soon as possible (ASAP) and to also inform the primary physician about the fall. Review of R21's Progress Notes dated 12/19/2023 to 12/20/2023 did not indicate any communication or notification to primary physician related to swollen and tender ankle. R21's Progress Notes by V21 dated 12/21/2023 indicated R21 complained of pain at 6/10 (pain scale) on BLE (bilateral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-28 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident who was identified as a maximum assist with activities of daily living prior to discharge and recommended 24-hour care was safely discharged back to his home. This affected one of three residents (R6) reviewed for sufficient preparation for transfer on the sample list of 21. This failure resulted in R6 being discharged home alone without 24 hour care to assist with incontinence care and lead to R6 being sent back to local emergency room with stage 1 pressure sore to buttocks six days after discharge. Findings include: R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified fracture of left wrist and hand, parainfluenza virus pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, difficulty walking, major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, seizures, diarrhea, anxiety, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and urinary tract infection. On 10/20/23 at 3:45Pm, R6 who was alert and oriented to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan after a change of condition for one of one resident (R21) reviewed for care plan in a sample of 10. Findings include: Review of R21's Progress Notes dated 12/22/2023 at 6:30PM indicated R21 returned from hospital with diagnosis (Dx) of fracture of left ankle and on non-weight bearing status. R21's care plan indicated last reviewed/revised on 12/21/2023 did not address the fracture and non-weight bearing status. On 01/11/2024 at 10:30AM during record review, R21's comprehensive care plan dated 12/21/2023 indicated no new problem, goal or approach after R21 came back from the hospital. At 3:00PM, R21's care plan was reviewed with V2 (Director of Nursing) and confirmed that no additional problem, goal or approach were noted on the comprehensive care plan. On 01/11/2024 at 3:00PM during interview with V2, V2 stated that the care plan should have been revised and updated after R21 came back from the hospital. On 01/11/2024 at 12:48PM during interview with V14 (Restorative Nurse), V14 said that R21's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care at least every two hours, and failed to ensure a shower or bath was provided at least two times a week. This affected two of three residents (R7, R10) reviewed activities of daily living care on the sample list of 21. This failure resulted in R7 being left and saturated in urine, and R10 receiving 1 staff provided bath in approximately 15 days. Findings Include: 1) R7 has the diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction. Minimal data set section C (cognitive patterns) dated 9/21/23 documents a score of eight which indicates moderate impairment. Section G (functional status) documents: R7 requires extensive assistance with one person physical assist with toilet use. Section H (bladder and bowel) documents: R7 is frequently incontinent (seven or more episodes of urinary incontinence.) On 11/16/23 at 2:42pm, R7 who was assessed to be alert to person and situation, was observed sitting in her wheelchair with wet areas in between her inner thighs. R7 was asked, why her pants were wet, R7 replied, I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor the resident after a fall for one of one resident (R21) reviewed for accidents in a sample of 10. Findings include: Review of R21's Progress Notes by V15 (Licensed Practical Nurse) dated 12/18/2023 indicated R21 had a fall, with no visible injury, and an NP (nurse practitioner) was informed with no new orders and to monitor R21. On 01/11/2024 at 3:00PM during record review with V2 (Director of Nursing), R21's progress notes and observations did not indicate any follow up monitoring and assessment of R21 after the fall on 12/18/2023 at 12:40PM until 12/21/2023 at 9:00AM. R21's Progress Notes by V21 (nurse practitioner/NP) dated 12/19/2023 indicated R21 was seen and examined with pain of 7/10(pain scale) on both lower extremities (BLE) especially to the ankle and knee and R21 said that she slipped off her commode and fell with complaint of (c/o) tenderness to touch on the outer lateral ankle which was also swollen. R21's Progress Notes by V21 dated 12/21/2023 indicated R21 informed V21 that no diagnostics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures related to ensuring that open/leftover foods were properly stores and labeled/dated; they failed to follow their cleaning and sanitation schedule to ensure the kitchen was kept in a sanitary/cleanly manner; and failed to ensure that residents were served meals that were of appropriate temperature. This failure has the potential to affect 96 residents that are currently receiving meals from the food service department. Findings include: Per facility diet tally sheet, the facility currently has four residents that are NPO (nothing by mouth). Per resident census report, the facility has 96 residents currently residing. On 4/10/23 at 9:40AM, initial observations of the kitchen were made with V15 (Dietary Manager). Observed walk-in cooler to have debris on the floor. V15 says the walk-in cooler should be kept in a more cleanly manner. V15 said she does not have anyone to put stock away and she is having a hard time hiring people. Noted an opened pack of cookies, container of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program to address insects and rodents in the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 96 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: On 4/10/23 at 9:40AM, it was observed that the walk-in cooler in the kitchen had three bags of uncooked pasta. V15 (Dietary Manager) said we store the dry pasta in here because we have had a problem with rodents getting into our food in the dry storage room. On 4/11/23 at 9:25AM, it was observed to have over ripened, brown/black banana in kitchen. V15 said, V15 saw a couple gnats flying around the bananas and they need to be thrown out. At 9:45AM, V16 (Cook) and V17 (Cook) were interviewed regarding rodents. V17 said we started seeing mice in the kitchen about a year ago. We would see them in the storeroom and started noticing food and package that would be chewed through and rodent droppings. We would have to throw out food. That is why we started putting certain products in the cooler because it is contained. We…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for ensuring the facility's environment was clean and homelike. This failure applied to seven of seven (R16, R18, R23, R25, R60, R83, R90) residents reviewed for environment. Findings include: On 04/10/23 at 11:06 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated to R18 and R23 why are your meal trays still in your room? Observed R18's and R23's breakfast trays were still left in their room. On 04/10/23 at 11:32 AM, observed R90's shared bathroom toilet with fecal spatter. On 04/10/23 at 11:43 AM, observed R83's bathroom floors and baseboards in poor condition, observed heavy buildup on wall vent, paint peeling from wall its baseboards peeling from wall. On 04/10/23 at 01:23 PM, observed R25's raised toilet seat in her bathroom with heavy build up, rust & some feces on the surface. Observed her bathroom floor vent with heavy build up, rust and chipped and warped paint around base of walls. On 04/10/23 at 03:34 PM, observed R60's bathroom vent with heavy build up and rust, base…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for ensuring residents receive necessary care and services to maintain good grooming and hygiene. This failure applied to six of six residents (R7, R9, R18, R75, R90, and R95) reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: On 04/10/23 at 11:37 AM, observed R90 yell out in pain when V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) adjusted his blanket. R90 stated that he has an ingrown toenail that is hurting him, and he has not seen the podiatrist in two to three months. On 04/11/23 at 9:56 AM, observed R18's fingernails to be long, yellow, and dirty. R18 stated he asked for his nails to be cut yesterday, but they couldn't because they didn't have any nail clippers. On 04/11/23 at 10:28 AM, observed R7's fingernails to be long. R7 stated his nails get clipped every now and then. On 04/11/23 at 3:25 PM, observed R90's fingernails to be very long. R90 stated he has not seen the podiatrist in months and has been asking. Observed R95's feet to be scaly and his toenails to be long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet resident needs for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This failure has the potential to affect all 23 residents currently residing on unit two of the facility. Findings include: 04/11/23 09:32 AM, R2 was observed in her room awake, alert and oriented and stated that the facility does not have enough staff, especially CNAs and sometimes you must wait for a long time before your call light is answered. 04/10/23 12:05PM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) pulled the surveyor aside and said that he needs to report that the workload in unit two is too much for one nurse. They used to have two nurses in the unit and recently they started scheduling only one. V5 added that they used to have agency nurses, but lately they stopped using them, and sometimes they have admissions and discharges in that unit, and one nurse must do that in addition to taking care of the residents. 04/12/23 at 11:46AM, V34 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN/Unit Manager) said that she has been complaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident or family of a reason for a room change and failed to provide any documentation of such notice in the resident's medical record. This failure affected one (R2) of one resident reviewed for room change. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year old female who has resided at the facility since 1/4/2023, with past medical history including, but not limited to unspecified asthma, heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, essential primary hypertension, muscle wasting, etc. 04/11/23 09:32 AM, R2 was observed in her room awake, alert and oriented and stated that she was moved from a different room to this room, she was in a room by herself previously and now she has a roommate who is always cold and R2 is always hot, the facility did not inform her prior the move and did not give her a choice of roommate. Reviewed resident's record and did not see any documentation that resident or her family member was notified of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident who are dependent on staff receive timely incontinence care. This failure applied to two of two residents (R12 and R18) reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: R12 is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses history of Bed Confinement Status and Stage IV Pressure Ulcer of Lower Back who was admitted to the facility 10/18/22. On 04/11/23 at 10:37 AM, R12 stated she was last changed last night. R12 stated she doesn't request to be changed. R12 stated they just come and change her at times. On 04/11/23 at 11:45 AM, observed V33 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) pull R12's brief that she just removed from her from the garbage. Observed R12's brief to be heavily saturated. Observed V33 pulled R12's sheets out from under her that she had been lying on just before receiving incontinence care to be heavily saturated. V33 stated R12's sheets are wet and will be changed. V33 stated she spilled some water on R12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify changes in the nutritional needs of a resident who is at nutritional risk. This failure applies to one of one resident (R18) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R18 is an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Partial Paralysis and Contracture who was admitted to the facility 06/17/2015. On 04/10/23 04:10 PM, R18 stated they leave his breakfast and don't help him eat. Observed R18's meal ticket, which stated that he requires tray set up. R18 stated they also don't leave his bedside table with his meal over him, and he is unable to access it. On 04/11/23 at 9:20 AM, observed R18's breakfast tray left with him and no one assisting him with his meal. On 04/11/23 at 9:39 AM, observed R18's meal ticket states he requires tray set up. Observed his breakfast included cut up sausage, scrambled eggs, oatmeal, English muffin. Observed R18 spilling food on himself. On 04/11/23 at 9:54 AM, observed V33 (Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that controlled medications are accurately reconciled and properly stored for two (R155 and R256) of two residents reviewed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include: On 04/11/23 at 11:01 AM, during inspection of medication cart A wing in Unit 2 with V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), it was observed that R256's Tramadol tablets were counted as 14 in the medication dispensing card. In the controlled drug receipt/record/disposition form, the remaining tablets should be 15. V6 stated, One tablet is missing. R256 has an order of Tramadol HCL (Hydrochloride) tablet 50 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed, per POS (Physician Order Sheet). Upon inspection of medication cart B wing in unit 2 also, one tablet of Oxycodone is missing in R155's medication dispensing card, leaving to 3 tablets only. In the controlled drug receipt/record/disposition form, 4 tablets should still be available. R155 has an order of Oxycodone tablet 20mg one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a five percent (5%) or lower medication error rate. There were six medication errors out of 36 medication opportunities observed, resulting in a 16.67% medication error rate. This failure affected two (R39 and R65) of six residents observed during medication administration. Findings include: On 04/11/23 V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was observed to for medication administration from 9:10AM to 10:30AM. At 9:12AM, V9 was observed to provide medication to R65. V9 confirmed that all medications due for the morning shift we given during this observation. After reviewing the Medication Administration record for 4/11/23, the nurse omitted four medications, however, the nurse documented that they were given during the time observed. These medications included eye drops: Brimonidine 0.2%-1 drop to L eye three times a day; Dorzolamide 2% 1 drop to L eye twice a day; Timolol 0.5% gel 1 drop to L eye three times a day, and Guaifenesin tab 600mg twice daily. At 10:05 am. V9 (LPN) was observed to prepare and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control standards while administering intravenous (IV) medications and while providing direct resident care to all residents in C and D halls. These failures applied to one (R305) of one resident receiving IV medication and to all residents currently residing on halls C and D of the facility. Findings include: On 4/10/23 at 2:22PM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was observed administering IV medication Cefazolin to R305. During this observation, V8 attached Intravenous tubing to Cefazolin bag dated 4/10/23 at 5AM which was disconnected from the resident and hanging from the IV pole prior to this observation. The opening of the tubing was not capped or covered. V8 entered room and did not wash hands with soap and water. V8 put on gloves and went to the bed side of R305 and began to administer the medication. V8 held the insertion point while cleaning the IV port R8 wiped the port quickly with an alcohol swab and flushed the tubing slowly. V8 then connected the tubing to R305. The tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$80,372 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $13,520 — penalty dated 2026-02-20
- $66,852 — penalty dated 2023-11-28
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-21 for 28 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ALIYA HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALIYA EC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| ALIYA OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| NEW DAY HORIZON | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| ERLICH, MOSHE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| REIFER, JORDAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| SHECHTER, AVINOAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| WEINFELD, AVRUM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| WEINFELD, DVORAH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| WEINFELD, EFRIAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ALI, HUSAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| BATOREK, ARLEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145681. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.