Thryve of South Holland
2145 East 170th Street, South Holland, IL 60473 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 216 certified beds · (708) 895-3255 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $35,640 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-04)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.3% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 97.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.0% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.9% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 16.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.3% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.8% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.89 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.42 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 35.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.9%CMS range 44.4–63.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.6–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 35.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 21.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.8–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 216 beds and averages 132.4 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 84 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accidental hazards, failed to provide an appropriate level of supervision, and failed to ensure the availability and use of an assistive device required for safe mobility for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for falls in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a fractured hip, which required hospitalization and surgical intervention.Findings include:R1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity with other Behavioral Disturbance; Anemia; Peripheral Vascular Disease; Essential (Primary) Hypertension; Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility; Anxiety Disorder; Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip; Vitamin B12 Deficiency Anemia; and Vitamin D Deficiency.According to R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] under section C, R1 has BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable wound for R32 who was identified as high risk for skin breakdown and dependent on staff for turning and repositioning, and failed to ensure air mattress pumps were appropriately set to the resident's weight per manufacture recommendations. This affected three of three residents (R32, R3, and R64) all reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention. This failure resulted in R32 having a facility acquire stage (3) three pressure wound of the left ear measuring 1.00 cm (length) x 0.50 (width) x 0.00 (depth).Findings include: R32's Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk dated 6/26/25 documents: high risk. Mobility: very limited: makes occasional slight changes in body or extremely position but unable to make frequent or significant changes independently. Nutrition: adequate. Friction and Shear: problem: requires moderate to maximum assistance in moving. Tissue test dated 6/27/25 documents: Resident requires more frequent turning and positioning then every 2 hours: No. Minimal data set section GG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow two residents fall care plan and failed to transfer two residents (R1, R2) in a safe manner using a wheelchair and mechanical lift in a sample of three. These failures resulted in R1 sustaining an avoidable fall out of wheelchair and R2 sustaining a fall while using a mechanical lift resulting in R2 being sent to hospital due to constant headache, left hip, left elbow and left leg pain for three days. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to quadriplegia cervical 1-cervical 4 complete, anxiety disorder and spinal stenosis cervical. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C0500 dated 4/4/2025 documents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score = 15 which suggests cognition is intact. MDS section GG0130 dated 4/42025 documents resident is dependent on staff for the following: eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and practice to ensure that medications are labeled with an open and expiration date, failed to ensure all medication was stored in a package with a label, and failed to remove expired medication from the medication cart. This affects six of six (R56, R97, R51, R5, R88, R55) residents and has the potential to affect all residents' that use house stock medication from the facility. On 7/29/2025 at 2:26pm during observation of the medication carts on unit 300, with assist from V2 (Director of Nursing) The following was observed: R56's Lantus Insulin pen had a dispense date of 12/5/2024, there was no open date or expiration noted on the pen. V2 said insulin expires 28 days after opening. House stock acidophilus capsules had a manufactures expiration date of 5/2025. House stock Bisacodyl 5mg (milligram) tabs had a manufactures expiration date of 6/2025. There were thirteen tan colored pills in a clear medicine cup, no label noted, V2 could not identify the pills. R97's Latanoprost eye drops did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have an effective policy and practice for eliminating odors in the facility. This has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors of the facility. On 7/29/25 during the survey tour, there were strong odors noted in the hallways and on the care unit three hundred.7/29/25 V13 (Facility Ombudsmen) said the odors in the facility has been an going issue.On 7/31/25 at 2:12pm V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) said the facility has contracted a company to clean the carpets, but the smell remains. 7/31/25 at 2:46pm V12 (Maintenance supervisor) said the odors are from the carpets. Things are spilled on the carpets, and residents have accidents sometimes. V12 said the carpets were cleaned by a service company 3 months ago. V12 said he uses the carpet extractor (Carpet Cleaner Machine) between having the carpet cleaned by a service company. V12 said the facility's carpet extractor is broken. V12 said the extractor has been broken for a while. Facility policy titled housekeeping services effective date January 2017…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to obtain PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) screening for one resident (R30) with diagnosis of Intellectual Disability. This affected one of three resident s (R30) reviewed for PASARR. This failure has resulted in a delay to move R30 to another facility. The findings include:On 7/29/25 at 12:15PM the surveyor attempted to speak with R30. R30 only said hello but would not verbally respond. R30 only shrugged her shoulders and turned away.On 7/29/25 at 11:24AM V13, Ombudsman, said R30's family has been waiting for a PASSR II to be done get her transferred to another facility. V13 said the family has been waiting for over 2 months.On 07/30/2025 at 1:15PM V8, Senior Social Service Director, said in May she called and asked about the PASSR II to be completed for R30. V8 said she was told that R30 requires a different PASSR II to be done and they have to send a state person out to do it. V8 said they didn't give her a turnaround time. On 7/30/25 at 11:52AM V1, Administrator, said we are trying to get a level II…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their urinary catheter care policy for indwelling catheter by not securing it to the residents leg. This affected one of one resident (R32) reviewed for catheter care. Findings Include: R32's physician order sheet dated 7/30/25 documents: Catheter in place for diagnosis for Neurogenic Bladder. On 07/30/2025 at 1:39PM, R32 was observed lying in bed on her left side with her indwelling catheter tubing positioned in between R32's posterior legs towards R32's buttock with brown stains on the folded statlock (indwelling catheter stabilization device designed to minimize catheter movement and accidental removal) on the tubing and not secure onto R32's leg. V6 (Nurse) said, R32's indwelling catheter was not secure to R32's leg and the statlock is dirty and undated. V6 said, R32's catheter should secured and clean. V6 said, she would replace the statlock today. On 7/31/25 at 10:31AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said, he expects staff to follow the facilities urinary catheter care policy. V2 said, indwelling catheters…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for fall prevention by not ensuring the fall intervention of providing two-person assistance for transfers was implemented while providing care for a resident who is totally dependent on staff for transfers. This failure applies to one of four residents (R3) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R3 is an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Rhabdomyolysis, Polyneuropathy, Presence of Left Artificial Knee Joint, History of Falling, and Generalized Arthritis who was admitted to the facility 06/07/2023. On 07/23/2025 at 11:34 AM Observed R3 in his room lying in his bead, R3 confirmed he had a fall on 07/18/2025, R3 stated he was being brought back to his room from a shower, the nursing aide placed the shower table next to his bed, and when a nursing aide was sliding him from the shower table to his bed he slid down to the floor. R3 stated he received a cat scan while at the hospital and he has bruising on his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report to state agency two unusual occurrences for two (R1, R2) of three residents reviewed for incidents and accidents. This failure resulted in R1 and R2 sustaining avoidable falls and R2 being sent to hospital with constant headache, left hip pain, left elbow pain and left leg pain. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted to facility on 4/25/2023 with diagnoses including but not limited to: transient cerebral ischemic attack, vascular dementia unspecified severity with behavioral disturbance and major depressive disorder. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C0500 dated 4/30/2025 documents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score = 06 which suggests severe cognitive impairment. MDS section GG0130 dated 4/30/2025 documents resident needs set up or clean up assistance with eating. Resident needs substantial/maximal assistance with lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. Resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate assistance with activities of daily living. This failure applies to five of five residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R7) reviewed for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). Findings include: 1. R1 is an [AGE] year-old female with a diagnoses history of Alzheimer's Disease, Lung Cancer, Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Encounter for Palliative Care who was admitted to the facility 02/18/2022. R1's current care plan documents she has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) performance deficit related to Alzheimer's and is totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living. On 05/05/2025 at 10:26 AM R1 is observed in her room sitting in her wheelchair. Observed multiple piles of dead ants on the floors behind chairs and on two large square velcro attachments on the wall behind her bed. 2. R2 is an [AGE] year-old female with a diagnoses history of Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for residents who are at risk for falls, with a history of falling; and they failed to implement effective fall interventions. This failure applies to two of two residents (R5 and R6) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R5 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Vascular Dementia; Peripheral Vascular Disease, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, and Lack of Coordination, who was admitted to the facility 01/06/2024. On 05/06/2025 at 9:53 AM R5 in observed in his room lying in his bed in the lowest position with confusion and his call light closed up in his nightstand drawer behind him. R5's Current Fall Care Plan initiated 03/02/2024 documents he has history of falling related to altered thought process, poor safety awareness, restlessness, and impaired mobility with interventions initiated 03/02/2024 of Give resident verbal reminders not to ambulate/transfer without assistance; widen and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean and free of clutter, trash, dust, food particles, soiled linens, substances, and chemical buildup. This failure applied to four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) reviewed for environment. Findings include: 1. R1 is an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Dementia, Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, Traumatic Brain Injury, Chronic Kidney Disease, Urine Retention, Urinary Tract Infections, Dysphagia, Disorder of Muscle, and Blindness in Right Eye who was admitted to the facility 04/16/2025. On 04/21/2025 at 10:19 AM V9 (Family Member of R1) stated yesterday she observed food particles in R1's bed and she observed red stains that looked like blood and the nursing aide told her it was Jello. On 04/21/2025 at 10:34 AM, R1 is in his room sitting on his bed. Observed R1's room floors to be sticky and with some trash on it, several red particles on his bed sheet, and a gown left on his bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide assistance for residents assessed to need assistance with activities of daily living and failed to provide assistance and/or supervision with feeding. These failures applied to three of three residents (R1, R3, and R4) reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. R1 is an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Dementia, Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, Traumatic Brain Injury, Chronic Kidney Disease, Urine Retention, Urinary Tract Infections, Dysphagia, Disorder of Muscle, and Blindness in Right Eye who was admitted to the facility 04/16/2025. R1's Current Care Plan initiated 04/17/2025 documents he has multiple diagnoses that impede his ability to perform activities of daily living at his prior level of functioning with interventions including assist with eating as needed. R1's Current Care Plan initiated 04/18/2025 documents has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for catheter care by not ensuring residents catheters were positioned properly to prevent contamination. This failure applies to two of three residents (R1 and R5) reviewed for catheter care. Findings include: 1. R1 is an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Dementia, Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, Traumatic Brain Injury, Chronic Kidney Disease, Urine Retention, Urinary Tract Infections, Dysphagia, Disorder of Muscle, and Blindness in Right Eye who was admitted to the facility 04/16/2025. R1's Current Care Plan initiated 04/17/2025 documents he has an Indwelling Catheter related to obstructive Uropathy with interventions including check tubing for kinks each shift. On 04/21/2025 at 10:34 AM, R1 is observed in his room sitting on his bed on top of his catheter tubing, his catheter tubing and bag is sitting directly on the floor in front of his bed, and R1's catheter bag is without a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility has failed to follow their fire watch policy by not reporting to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) that the sprinkler system is not working in all four units of the facility. This has the potential to affect all 117 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include: Facility's census dated 4/3/25 denotes 117 residents. Facility Fire Watch Policy denotes to establish a process for fire safety in the event that the fire protection system fails or is not operating (includes service being performed on system). When the sprinkler system is impaired, the extent and duration of the impairment has been determined, areas or buildings involved are inspected and risks are determined, recommendations are submitted to management or designated representative, and the fire department and other authorities having jurisdiction have been notified. Facility incident report dated 1/23/25 denotes on 1/22/25 description of occurrence: Facility is on Fire Watch related to broken pipe. Fire Dept (Department) has been made aware. Occurrence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their practice and ensure to transcribe a physician order to include the right dose, right diagnosis, and duration for prednisone 60mg (milligram) tablets, and failed to complete an order for Norco 7.5mg-325mg for 3 days for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for physician orders. Findings include: R1's face sheet shows R1 has diagnosis of osteoarthritis, aftercare following joint replacement, COPD, weakness, lack of coordination, low back pain, and hypertension. On 11/13/24 at 1:46pm V2 (Director of Nursing) said the physician order Prednisone 60 mg by mouth for 5 days for R1 on 6/14/24 was for COPD exacerbation. V2 said the Nurse should have clarified the order with the physician, and transcribed the order as given. V2 said if the nurse was not sure of the order, she should have contacted her (V2) or the physician for clarification. V2 said the Nurse needs reeducation on transcribing verbal orders. V2 said the order for prednisone 1mg (60mg) is not correct as transcribed by the nurse on the medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (activity of daily living) care to a dependent resident and provide incontinence care at least every two hours, and failed to ensure residents are provided a bath per facility policy. This affected four of four residents (R1, R3, R4, and R6) reviewed for activity of daily living. Findings include: 1. On 10/1/24 at 11:50am R6 was observed alert and orientated to person, place, time, and situation. R6 said she had not been changed for hours. R6 said she was changed at 11:00am, and prior to that she was changed at 5:30am. R6, with assist from V1 (CNA/Certified Nurses Aide) showed surveyor her gown, shirt, and mattress, R6's shirt, gown and mattress was observed soiled in urine and smelled of urine. 10/3/24 at 2:26pm V9 (ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing) said staff should be checking and changing residents every two hours, they should apply skin barrier cream as appropriate to prevent moisture from breaking down the skin. R6's care plan dated 4/13/24 denotes resident has ADL care performance deficit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide supervision during smoking breaks for a resident (R8) identified to require supervision. This affected one of three residents (R8) reviewed for safety during smoking. Findings include: On 10/1/24 11: 20am R8, R9, R10 were observed smoking outside on the patio. Staff was observed inside the facility. V13 (Activity aide) said she was monitoring the resident but had to step away. R8 was observed with holes in his shirt and pants. There was no ash tray observed for R8, R9, R10 to use while smoking. Greater than 200 cigarettes butts were observed on the ground. There was a brown flowerpot observed melted (place on the ground), half of the flowerpot was missing. There was a circular burn area noted on the metal table with melted debris on the table and ground. V13 said the residents were putting their cigarettes out in that flowerpot. V13 said she did not report that to anyone. V13 said there was an ash tray just out here, V13 was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident call light is within reach. This deficiency affects one (R44) of three residents in the sample for 26 reviewed for Accommodation of needs and Resident safety. Finding include: On 8/13/24 at 12:15PM, Observed R44 lying in bed. His call light is placed on top of his bedside tray table away from him and unable to reach. He is alert and oriented, able to verbalize needs to staff. R44 said the CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) transferred him back to bed after his therapy this morning. He said that if he cannot reach his call light he will yell for help until someone comes to his room. Called V24 RN (Registered Nurse) and showed observation made. V24 said that his call light should be within his reach. She moved the bedside tray table next to his bed and placed the call light within reach. On 8/13/24 at 1:01PM, Informed V2 DON (Director of Nursing) of above observation and asked for policy. R44 is admitted on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0575 — isolatedPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post information including names, address (mailing and email) and telephone numbers of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman Program in a form and manner thats accessible and understandable to residents and resident's representatives. This deficiency affects one (R116) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Resident rights. Findings include: On 8/13/24 at 11:06 AM, V16 (Family member) presented concerns and frustrations regarding care of R116 received from the facility. V16 also said that he is not aware of the State Agency and advocacy group that he can reach out to for his concerns. At 11:30AM, Rounds made with V16 (Social Service Director-SSD) and V16 (Family member) to the front lobby bulletin board. Observed no posting for State of Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman Program contact information. V6 (SSD) said that there should be posting about State of LTC Ombudsman Program to the front and in all units that is visible and accessible to the resident and family member. Rounds made to Medicare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident (R111) from verbal abuse by a staff member. This deficiency affects 1 (R111) of 4 residents in a sample of 26 reviewed for abuse prevention. Findings include: On 8/15/2024 at 12:05 PM an interview with V1 (Administrator) was conducted. V1 stated the alleged event on 6/6/2024 between R111 and V27 (Housekeeper) was investigated and found substantiated. V1 said V27 has been terminated and no longer works at the facility. R111 discharged to community on 8/9/2024 as planned. On 8/15/2024 at 12:54 PM interview with V6 (Social Service Director) completed. V6 stated she was a witness to the verbal abuse of R111 by V27. Review of Facility Incident Report completed by V1 on 6/12/2024 indicated on 6/6/2024 at 12:00PM, R111 was in his room when V27 entered to clean and started moving his items without consent. R111 asked V27 not to touch his items, however V27 did not heed to the request and continued to clean along with moving the items R111 stated V27 became upset with the request and started using profanity. R111…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that meets resident's choice of activities and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This deficiency affects one (R116) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for developing comprehensive care plans. Findings include: On 8/13/24 at 11:15AM, V16 (Family member) presented the concerns regarding his fathers care, R116. V16 said his father was admitted last month in July. He said that his father had stroke and was admitted to this facility for rehabilitation. R116 was only given a shower once since admission. He added that R116 does not go to activities after his therapy, he just lays in bed. The facility does not motivate his father to participate. On 8/13/24 at 11:26AM, R116 was observed sitting in his wheelchair. His hair is disheveled, oily, and unkempt. He is not shaved. He has a scraggly beard (when growth gets out of hand and starts to look unkempt). He said that he only took a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. This deficiency affects two (R44 and R116) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for ADL (Activity of Daily Living) care services. Findings include: 1. On 8/13/24 at 11:15AM, V16 (Family member) presented the concerns regarding his fathers care, R116. V16 said his father was admitted last month in July. He said that his father had a stroke and was admitted to this facility for rehabilitation. R116 was only given a shower once since admission. On 8/13/24 at 11:26AM, Observed R116 sitting in his wheelchair. His hair is disheveled, oily, and unkempt. He is not shaved. He has a scraggly beard (when growth gets out of hand and starts to look unkempt). He said that he only took shower once since he was admitted last month. R116 is admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis listed in part but not limited to Cerebral infarction due to occlusion or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement its policy on prevention of pressure ulcer's by failing to ensure low air loss mattress is properly functioning and failing to apply bilateral heel protector's when in bed as ordered by physician. This deficiency affects two (R44 and R91) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Pressure ulcer prevention program. Findings include: 1. On 8/13/24 at 11:40AM, observed R91 lying in bed in semi sitting position, leaning to his right with his head hanging from the bed. Noted his LAL (Low air loss) mattress sagging and deflated, R91 sinks in the mattress. R91 has bilateral heel protectors. Called V22 (CNA-Certified Nurse Assistant) and showed observation. V22 said that the LAL mattress should not be deflated like this, it's not working properly. She disconnected and reconnected tubing from the LAL mattress and started to inflate. She said that they should check the LAL mattress if its function properly. She is the assigned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide foot care and preventive treatment to a diabetic resident to prevent podiatric complications. This deficiency affects one (R44) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Diabetic Foot care services. Findings include: On 12:15pm observed R44 lying in bed. R44 was observed with long dirty fingernails. R44 is alert and oriented, able to verbalize needs to staff. Called V24 (Registered Nurse-RN) and showed long dirty fingernails of R44. V24 said that R44 is diabetic. Surveyor requested to see R44's toenails. V24 removed his bilateral socks and observed long toenails. V24 said that podiatrist should trim his toenails. On 8/14/24 at 12:30PM, Informed V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) of above concerns identified. V2 said that for diabetic residents the podiatrist will trim the toenails. On 8/15/24 at 10:30AM, V2 said that residents who need to be seen by Podiatrist will be scheduled within a month from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain was assessed before and during wound care, for 1 of 3 residents (R65) in a sample of 26 reviewed for pain management. Findings include: On 8/13/2024 at 11:20am R65 was observed in bed with a dressing to her left foot. R65 said I have a dressing change every other day to my foot and the wound care nurse does not give me any pain medication. I know I have a stronger one than Tylenol. I have hydrocodone and she just says its not in as of yet. It's been over a month. R65 said her pain level is a 6. On 8/13/2024 at 12:47pm V23 (Wound-Care Nurse) said R65 is alert and oriented times two to three with forgetfulness, she does not say she's in pain when I start her wound care. When I ask R65 if she's in pain she says no. On 8/13/2024 at 12:55pm V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) said I expect the wound care nurses to ask resident's if they have any pain before starting a wound care dressing and while completing the wound care dressing. An admission record indicates that R65 has a diagnosis of peripheral vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure daily refrigerator temperature check inside the resident room to ensure proper temperature and food safety. This deficiency affects two (R29 and R128) of 2 residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Resident safe food storage. Findings include: On 8/13/24 at 11:33AM, observed R29's refrigerator monitoring temperature log was not done this morning. The only entry on the log is 8/1/24. Observed 3 puddings, 1 foam cup of orange juice, 1 plastic fruit container not labeled or dated. Called V19 (Registered Nurse-RN) and showed observation made. V19 said that maintenance is the one monitoring and recording the resident's refrigerator temperature daily. V19 said that food should be labeled to know when to discard it. V19 said she did not know why the temperature log was not completed. On 8/13/24 at 11:35AM, Observed R128's refrigerator monitoring temperature log was not done this morning. The only entry log is 8/1/24. Observed 5 yogurts, 5 fresh fruit cups, 1 container of ham, 6 juices, 4 milk cartons and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow their housekeeping policy and procedures by not ensuring the memory care unit was clean and free of odors. This failure applied to all 21 residents currently located in the memory care unit. Findings include: On 06/14/2024 at 2:42 PM Observed the memory care unit with strong odors including urine just before entering the unit and directly near the entrance of the unit. On 06/14/2024 at 2:47 PM Observed a strong urine odor near R5's room located on the memory care unit. On 06/14/2024 at 2:56 PM Observed strong odors including urine near R7's room located on the memory care unit. The facility's census report documents a total of 21 residents located on the memory care unit. On 06/17/2024 at 11:45 AM V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated she had observed strong odors just as you enter the memory care unit. V2 stated she did wonder what the source of the smell was. V2 stated she believes V9 (Environmental Manager) was notified of the smell but could not confirm. V2 stated it would be expected that V9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for notice of change in condition by not ensuring resident's family members were notified of changes in resident health status and medications. This failure applied to three of four residents (R4, R5, and R7) reviewed for notice of change. Findings include: 1. R4 is a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility 03/09/2023 with a diagnoses history of Lower Back Pain, Spinal Stenosis, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Difficulty in Walking. On 06/14/2024 at 4:25 PM R4 is observed in her room sitting in the wheelchair. R4 stated she did select V21 (R4's Family Member) as her emergency contact and had informed the facility that she did want her sister notified about any changes in her health. R4's face sheet documents V21 is her emergency contact. R4's Thyroid Labs collected 04/12/2024 and 04/24/2024 documents abnormal Thyroid Hormone levels. R4's current physician orders document an order effective 04/23/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident received physical therapy services for which the resident was assessed and care planned for, with physician orders in place. This failure applied to one of one resident (R4) reviewed for physical therapy services. Findings include: R4 is a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility [DATE] with a diagnoses history of Lower Back Pain, Spinal Stenosis, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Difficulty in Walking. On [DATE] at 4:25 PM R4 is observed in her room sitting in the wheelchair. R4 stated she has been in the facility since March of 2023, was discharged from PT (Physical Therapy) October of 2023 and wanted to know when she could resume but even after repeated requests there was no follow up from the PT department. R4 stated her family requested to have a meeting regarding her Physical Therapy and only wanted to speak with the Physical Therapy Director. R4 stated the facility included the Director of Nursing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy on resident's rights by failing to knock on the door before entering a resident's room for 4 of 8 residents (R107, R125, R236, R237) in a sample of 28. Findings include: On 10/17/2023 at 12:15 PM, V18 (CNA - Certified Nurses Assistant) was observed entering R107's room with a lunch tray and without knocking. On 10/17/2023 at 12:17 PM, V18 was observed entering R125's room with a lunch tray without knocking. On 10/17/2023 at 12:20 PM, V18 was observed entering R236 room with a lunch tray and not knocking. On 10/17/2023 at 12:30 PM, V18 was asked what she should do before entering a resident's room. V18 stated, I should sanitize my hands. On 10/17/2023 at 1:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) stated, I expect all staff to knock before entering and wait for permission to enter. Facility Policy: Resident Rights Protocol for All Nursing Procedures. Purpose: To provide general guidelines for resident rights while caring for the resident. Preparation: 1. Prior to having direct-care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care to a dependent resident. This deficiency affects one (R185) of three residents in the sample of 28 reviewed for providing Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Care. Findings include: R185 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses listed as Metabolic encephalopathy, Multiple Myeloma, Multiple unstageable pressure ulcers, and Adult Failure to thrive. R185's Care plan indicates ADLs functional deficit. She has multiple diagnosis and past medical history impeded her to continue to perform ADLs. MDS ( Minimum Date Set Assessment) admission assessmen,t dated 10/6/23 Section GG Functional Abilities and goals, indicate dependent in ADLs. On 10/17/23 at 12:05PM, R185 was lying on the bed with family members at bedside. R185's fingernails were long and dirty. On 10/18/23 at 10:34AM, R185 was lying on the bed with family members at bedside. R185's fingernails were still long and dirty with black matter underneath nails Showed observation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow manufacturer recommendation in using low air loss mattress to a resident who has multiple unstageable pressure ulcers. This deficiency affects one (R185) of three residents in the sample of 28 reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention management. Findings include: R185 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Pressure ulcer of sacral region unstageable, Pressure ulcer of left hip stage 4, Pressure ulcer of left buttock unstageable, Pressure ulcer of right ankle unstageable, Pressure ulcer of right heel unstageable, Pressure ulcer of left heel unstageable, and Pressure ulcer of right shin unstageable. admission skin assessment/Braden scale, dated 10/1/23, indicated she is at high risk for developing skin impairment. Physician order sheet (POS) indicates: Pressure reducing Low Air loss Mattress. R185's Care plan indicates: R185 was admitted with multiple pressure ulcers. She is at risk for further breakdown due to decreased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to monitor resident for one of one resident (R51) in the sample of 28 reviewed for safety. Findings include: On 10/17/2023 at 9:15 AM, no posting was observed anywhere at the front desk or lobby indicating what items can and/or cannot be brought inside the facility. On 10/17/2023 at 12:22 PM, V25 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said she has observed empty bottles of alcohol/liquor in R51's room before. V25 said she removes it from the room, and takes it to the Director of Nursing (DON). V25 said she had asked R51 who has been bringing him the alcohol/liquor, but R51 would not tell her. On 10/19/2023 at 9:37AM, V10 (Social Service Director) said R51 uses online food and grocery delivery service to order the liquor, or R51's friends will bring it to him. V10 also said each time an incident like this occurs, the care plan should be updated and implemented. On 10/19/2023 at 11:03AM, V37 (Psychiatry Physician Assistant) stated R51 said he obtained the liquor through online food and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician order for medical indication and size for using indwelling catheter to a resident. This deficiency affects one (R185) of three residents in the sample of 28 reviewed for Urinary Catheter Management. Findings include: On 10/17/23 at 12:05 PM, R185 was lying on the bed with family members at bedside. R185 had indwelling catheter connected to drainage bag, draining to dark yellow orange urine. Family member said R185 was admitted on [DATE] from the hospital. R185's medical records indicated she was admitted on [DATE],3 with diagnoses including Metabolic encephalopathy, Multiple Myeloma, and Multiple unstageable pressure ulcers. Physician order sheet indicates: (indwelling) Catheter. No medical indication, no catheter size and balloon size documented. On 10/18/23 at 9:48 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, said if resident is admitted with an indwelling catheter, they have to get an order for medical indication, catheter and balloon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label ongoing tube feeding for one of two residents (R36) reviewed for tube feeding in a sample of 28. Findings include: R36's Physician Order Report, dated 09/19/2023 - 10/19/2023, indicated admit date of 12/21/2019, diagnoses including gastrostomy status and dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and order for enteral feeding with order date of 01/16/2023. On 10/17/2023 at 10:48 AM, R36's tube feeding was observed attached to R36, unlabeled. On 10/17/2023 at 10:48 AM, V21 (Agency nurse) stated the tube feeding should be labeled before attaching to the resident. On 10/18/2023 at 9:50 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated all tube feeding should be labeled because if it is not, the tube feeding could pass the acceptable length of time of treatment and get spoiled. Facility Policy: Title: Gastric Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump Revised August 2008 Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide nourishment to the resident who is unable to obtain nourishment orally. Steps in the Procedure: 2. Properly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' refrigerator for three of three residents (R41, R51, R44) observed for food safety in a sample of 28. Findings include: 1. On 10/17/2023 at 10:45 AM, R44's refrigerator was observed with undated food items inside with no thermometer and temperature log. On 10/17/2023 at 10:48 AM, V22 (Registered Nurse/RN) said the refrigerator's temperature should be monitored on a daily basis by the night shift. V22 also said there should be thermometer inside the refrigerator, and food items should be dated. 2. On 10/17/2023 at 10:46 AM, R51's refrigerator was observed with undated food items inside with no thermometer and temperature log. 3. On 10/17/2023 at 10:47 AM, R41's refrigerator was observed with undated food items inside with refrigerator-cooler temperature log not indicating the month and year, and missing entries from 1st to 25th. On 10/17/2023 at 10:48 AM, V21 (Agency Nurse) said the refrigerator's temperature should be monitored in a daily basis. On 10/18/2023 at 9:50 AM, V2 (Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-08-01 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum data set (MDS) assessment was recorded with accurate information for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R14, R45, R113 and R18) reviewed for accuracy of MDS.Findings include: 1. R1's MDS dated [DATE], section I for active diagnosis, show psychiatric mood disorders, no is checked for depression. Review of R1's medical diagnosis there are no diagnosis for psychiatric illness. R1's progress notes from psychotherapist denotes diagnosis: generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate. 2. R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, anemia, alcohol abuse, and cerebral infarction R14's preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) level II outcome dated 5/10/24 documents approved without specialized services. Under PASRR grouping documents: You fall into the category of having a diagnosis that the PASRR program was designed to assess. Your condition is likely to require expert…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$35,640 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $17,050 — penalty dated 2026-01-04
- $18,590 — penalty dated 2025-07-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ALIYA HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROTHNER, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2018 |
| ISRAEL, LEVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2023 |
| COLE, NICHOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/07/2023 |
| ATIED ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2018 |
| EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2018 |
| EXTENDED CARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2018 |
| ROTH & CO, LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2024 |
| DEL PRIORE, ANTHONY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/31/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145608. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.