Aspyre of Waukegan

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 74.8 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident with dementia, poor safety awareness, and known exit seeking behaviors resulting in the resident eloping from the second floor of the facility through an alarmed door, walking down 14 interior steps, and going out a second alarmed door that led outside. R1 proceeded down 4 concrete steps, onto a wooden deck, turned right, and went down a wooden ramp, across the facility's parking lot, then crossed a busy 4 lane street. R1 then walked through another parking lot of an apartment complex and was found unresponsive (deceased ) near the back of the apartment building approximately 125 yards from the facility's emergency exit door on 4/8/26. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 12. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 4/8/26 when R1 eloped from the facility. V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4/10/26 at 4:24PM. The surveyor confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received a higher level of care for a resident experiencing respiratory distress. This delay in medical intervention resulted in R77's death. This applies to 1 of 21 residents (R77) reviewed for care and services in the sample of 21.The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] when the resident (R77) was found having respiratory distress and died the same day.V1 (Administrator) was notified of Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 2:45 PM. This surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE] but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training.The findings include:R77's electronic face sheet shows R77 has diagnoses that include, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases, (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure, vascular dementia and diabetes.R77's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 1/2026 shows R77 has an order of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) was free from sexual abuse from a resident (R2) with known sexual behaviors. This failure resulted in R1 being sexually abused by R2. These failures apply to 1 of 9 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy started on 9/6/23 when R2 with a known history of sexually inappropriate behaviors started displaying inappropriate sexual behaviors and the facility failed to put interventions in place, and to notify his physician or nurse practitioner of the behaviors. This led to R2 behaviors escalating and R2 sexually abusing R1. V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 9/25/23 at 2:00 PM. This surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 9/26/23, however, noncompliance remains at a Level 2 because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify and assess a pressure ulcer prior to developing a new unstageable pressure ulcer and failed to implement pressure relieving interventions for a resident at risk for developing pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in R59 developing an unstageable pressure ulcer to her right ischium. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R59) in the sample of 21 reviewed for pressure injuries. The findings include: R59's face sheet shows she has diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, unspecified dementia, hypertensive heart disease, dysphagia and bilateral hearing loss. On 2/22/26 at 9:51 AM, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) said R59 has an open area to her right buttock with a foam dressing. On 2/22/26 at 1:36 PM, R59 was sitting in her reclining wheelchair with no pressure relieving cushion. R59 was thin and underweight. She was yelling out, help me, help me. V10 and V23 (Certified Nursing Assistant) transferred her with the mechanical lift to her bed and provided incontinence care. A foam dressing was in place to her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that dishware and utensils were sanitized prior to use, failed to safely store open lunch meat in the refrigerator, failed to store bulk item scoops in a sanitary manner and failed to ensure hands were washed before preparing food items. This applies to all 77 residents who reside at the facility. The findings include:The Resident Roster provided on 2/22/26 shows that there are 77 residents residing at the facility. On 2/22/26 at 9:42 AM, V5 (Cook/Dietary Aide) was using the dishwasher. V5 tested the chemical dishwasher with a test strip and it was not reading any chemical concentration. V5 tested it multiple times with the same results. V5 then primed the lines and tested again with a different set of test strips with the same results. V3 (Dietary Manager) then tested with the same results and said that she would have maintenance come and look at it. On 2/22/2026 at 9:58 AM, V5 put the dish rack of plate covers and trays away that had just been ran through the dishwasher. V5 continued to use the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a Water Management Plan that includes an assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread, control measures to prevent the growth of opportunistic waterborne pathogens and a system to monitor the control measures. The facility also failed to ensure residents with wounds and an indwelling urinary catheter were placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and facility staff failed to remove their gloves and wash their hands to prevent the spread of infection. This applies to all 77 residents residing at the facility.The findings include: 1.The Resident Roster provided on 2/22/26 shows that there are 77 residents residing at the facility. The facility provided a two page document that was titled Water Management Program. The document shows, The Water Management Program: Identifies building water systems for which legionella control measures are needed. Assesses how much risk the hazardous conditions in those water systems pose. Applies control measures to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion had splints in place for 4 of 12 residents (R63, R6, R16, R32) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 21.The findings include: 1. On 2/22/26 at 9:52 AM, R63 was reclined back in his chair, his left hand was curled inward indicating he had a contracture to the hand. There were no splints or braces on his hands or legs. R63 was also observed at 11:30 AM, 11:44 AM and 12:40 PM and he did not have splints on. R63's face sheet shows he has diagnoses including aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction and has contractures to the left knee, left elbow, left shoulder and left hand. R63's Physician Order Summary shows an active order for him to have a left hand and elbow brace on for 4 hours on with morning care, and off at lunch time. R63's restorative charting for February 2026 shows the facility should apply R63's splints as ordered. On 2/23/26 at 12:18 PM, V11…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a locked area, failed to ensure medications were stored in a manner to not compromise the integrity of the medication and failed to have schedule II controlled substances double locked. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R29, R13, R48, R50 and R64) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 21. The findings include:On 2/22/26 at 11:51 AM, the medication room on the first floor was not locked. There was a bag of fluconazole tablets on the counter in the room. The refrigerator was not locked and contained multiple insulin pens for R29, R13 and R48 and a box of Trulicity for R50. There was a container in the refrigerator containing an insulin pen for R50, a box of acetaminophen suppositories and a box of bisacodyl suppositories for R64. The container had a 1/4 inch of liquid in the bottom of it and the boxes were saturated. On 2/22/26 at 1:07 PM, The second floor west medication cart was reviewed. The narcotic box inside of the cart was not locked and was able to be opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the pureed rice was in the form to meet the resident's needs for 6 of 6 residents (R5, R23, R37, R39, R49 and R64) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 21. The findings include:The facility's Diet Type Report printed on 2/23/26 shows that R5, R23, R37, R39, R49 and R64 are on pureed diets.2/22/26 at 12:55 PM, a pureed diet tray was sampled. The pureed rice was very thick and had chucks of rice throughout. At 12:57 PM, V3 (Dietary Manager) tasted the pureed rice. V3 was observed chewing the rice. V3 said that the rice was not the right consistency. V3 said that it was too gritty. V3 said that pureed food should be smooth like baby food and not have chunks in it. The Facility's Pureed Diet Sheet shows, A Pureed diet is food with a very smooth consistency or foods that have been well processed in a food processor or blender to a very smooth consistency or texture. No solid pieces or parts can be noticed in the food.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed after a Serious Mental Illness (SMI) diagnosis change for 1 of 6 residents (R4) reviewed for PASRR in the sample of 21. The findings include:R4's face sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Hemiplegia affecting the left side. A diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was added to her diagnoses on 12/13/19. A PASRR screening was requested from the facility by this surveyor and what was provided was an Interagency Certification of Screening Results (OBRA) dated 5/13/19 and does not identify R4 as having a SMI diagnosis.On 2/23/2026 at 1:24 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the PASRR for R4 was ordered to be done today. The facility provided PASRR screening policy dated 8/2022 shows that a PASRR level 2 should be completed if a resident has a SMI diagnosis.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed for a resident with a SMI (Serious Mental Illness diagnosis for 1 of 6 residents (R54) reviewed for PASRR in the sample of 21.The findings include: R54's face sheet shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Other Schizophrenia, Major Depression Recurrent, and anxiety disorder.The facility provided an Interagency Certification of Screening results (OBRA) dated 4/16/15 for R54 which does not identify R54 as having a Serious Mental Illness diagnosis and shows the screening is good for 90 days. There was no PASRR for R54 in his Electronic Medical Record.On 2/23/2026 at 12:40 PM, V15 (Social Services Director) and V14 (Admissions and marketing) said the admission department looks for PASRRs when a resident is admitted . 02/23/2026 1:24 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the PASRR for R54 was ordered by the facility today. The facility provided PASRR screening…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident and failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for 2 of 21 residents (R73, R32) reviewed for safety in the sample of 21.The findings include:1.R73 has diagnoses that include traumatic subdural hemorrhage, dementia and unsteadiness of feet. On 2/22/26 at 10:12 AM, R73 was in bed alert and pleasant. V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) was also in the room assisting R73 up from bed to wheelchair. V17 (CNA) placed R73's wheelchair at the side of the bed. Then assisted R73 to sit at the edge of the bed. V17 placed R73's walker in front of him and instructed R73 to get up. R73 placed both of his hands in the walker, leaned forward and used the walker to pull himself up, but he was not able to. R73 stated ok, I'll try one more time. Again, R73 leaned forward and use the walker to pull himself up. V17 put his hands under R73's armpits and lifted R73 in standing position. V17 then instructed R73 to use his walker to turn and sit in his wheelchair. V17 went behind R73's wheelchair,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were given for a resident with significant weight loss. This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R11) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 21. The findings include: 1. R11's face sheet shows she has diagnoses including major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, severe psychotic disturbance, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 2/22/26 at 10:10 AM, R11 was sitting in the dining room with her breakfast tray in front of her. She was served eggs, oatmeal and milk and her nutritional supplement was not provided. At 11:57 PM, R11 was in the dining room sitting at the same table. At 12:41 PM, lunch trays were delivered to the 2nd floor, R11 was served her noon meal, and her nutritional supplement shake was not provided. On 2/23/26 at 12:51 PM, R11 was sitting in the dining room during the noon meal. She was served a regular tray feeding herself. R11 was not given her nutritional shake during the noon meal. On 2/23/26 at 12:17 PM, V10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered at ordered times. There were 26 opportunities with 2 errors resulting in a 7.6% error rate. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R6) observed in the medication pass.On 2/22/26 at 11:00 AM, V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) prepared R6's morning medications including Amiodarone 200 mg (milligrams) give via g-tube two times a day for arrhythmia and Metoprolol 25 mg give half of tablet two times a day for hypertension. R6 crushed the medications separately and administered the medications through R6's g-tube. At 11:30 AM, V6 said R6 was her last resident for morning medication pass. On 2/26/26 at 10:51 AM, V16 (LPN) said morning medication pass should be from 8:00 AM to 10:00 AM. R6's Medication Administration Record dated February 2026 shows orders to administer at 9:00 AM; amiodarone 200 mg one tablet via g-tube two times a day and metoprolol 25 mg give half of tablet two times a day. The facility's Medication Administration Policy dated 3/24 states, To ensure that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$135,606 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $26,720 — penalty dated 2026-04-13
• $108,886 — penalty dated 2023-09-26
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-20 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALIYA HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $446K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL