Aliya Of Evanston
1300 Oak Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 57 certified beds · (847) 869-1300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $52,199 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 100.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.8% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.4% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.8% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.9% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 39.3% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 24.6% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.37 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.79 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 78.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 78.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 52.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.18 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 1.07 to 1.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to provide a hazard free environment by allowing resident to be exposed to a stationary floor block heater near resident's bed after a fall for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents/hazards in the sample of three. As a result of this failure, R1 laid on the floor for an undetermined amount of time in contact with the heat source. R1 was emergently sent to the hospital, and treated for second-degree burns and pain management. This was identified as an immediate jeopardy. The immediate jeopardy began on 01/02/2024 when R1 fell and came in contact with a heat source as R1 was positioned between the bed and the radiator. The immediacy was removed on 01/09/2024. V1 (Administrator), V10 (Nurse Consultant/acting DON), and V13 (Regional Consultant) were notified on 01/04/2024 at 11:40 AM of the immediate jeopardy. The facility presented the department with an initial removal plan on 01/04/2024. However, an acceptable removal plan was received on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for an indwelling urinary catheter for one resident (R1), resulting in a 4-hour period without nursing assessment or intervention when the catheter was not draining urine, leading to bladder distention and a traumatic bleeding insertion site injury that required immediate hospitalization. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, and medical diagnosis including but not limited to paraplegia, complete; encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device; cystitis, unspecified with hematuria; hydronephrosis with ureteropelvic junction obstruction; acute kidney failure, unspecified; and calculus of kidney with calculus of ureter.On 02/18/2026 at 1:00 PM, R2 said R1 called him from the hospital one night when he was asleep and said V3 (LPN), a nurse from another floor, went to his room to change his catheter because his own nurse, V4 (RN),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed and demonstrated the competencies necessary to timely recognize, assess, and respond to a resident's acute change in condition and urgent call for help. This resulted in actual harm (significant bleeding requiring emergency hospitalization) for one resident (R1) who experienced a traumatic complication from an indwelling catheter insertion. R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, and medical diagnosis including but not limited to paraplegia, complete; encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device; cystitis, unspecified with hematuria; hydronephrosis with ureteropelvic junction obstruction; acute kidney failure, unspecified; and calculus of kidney with calculus of ureter.On 02/18/2026 at 1:00 PM, R2 said R1 called him from the hospital one night when he was asleep and said V3 (LPN), a nurse from another floor, went to his room to change his catheter because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Residents Rights Policy by not ensuring the resident felt safe in the facility. This deficient practice affected one resident (R3) out of three residents reviewed for Resident Rights within a total sample of 3 residents.R3 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3s medical diagnosis on the admission record are, but are not limited to, other cervical disc degeneration at C5-C6, mild intermittent asthma, type 2 diabetes mellitus, disorders of urethra, acute kidney failure, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, bipolar disorder with psychotic features, alcohol abuse, depression, and adult failure to thrive.On 12/31/2025 at 11:05AM, R3 was observed in his room, sitting upright in his room. R3 states R3 usually receives his scheduled morning medications around 8:00AM-9:00AM. R3 states on Christmas day 12/25/2025 he had his breakfast and had not received his scheduled morning medication.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure and offer pneumococcal vaccinations to new residents within seven days. This failure applied to four (R16, R25, R32, and R45) of six residents reviewed for vaccinations.Findings include:R16 is a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and continues to reside in the facility. R16 has multiple diagnoses including but not limited to the following: cerebral infarction, type II DM, obesity, epilepsy, sleep apnea, and acute kidney failure.R25 is an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and continues to reside in the facility. R25 has multiple diagnoses including but not limited to the following: rhabdomyolysis, protein calorie malnutrition, HTN, cellulitis, CAD, and depression.R32 is a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and continues to reside in the facility. R32 has multiple diagnoses including but not limited to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy to inform and obtain consents prior to the administration of psychotropic medication for two residents (R4 and R42) reviewed for psychotropic medication.Findings include:R4 is a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and continues to reside in the facility. R4 has multiple diagnoses including but not limited to the following: type II DM, cellulitis of face, multiple fractures, sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, sciatica, alcohol abuse, schizoaffective disorder, and cocaine abuse.Per Physician Order Summary Report, R4 started Quetiapine Fumarate (Antipsychotic) on 10/8/2025 and continues to receive medication. Per Psych: Consent for Antipsychotics was signed and dated 10/15/2025. It is to be noted that R4 received an antipsychotic medication for seven days before consenting to the medication.R42 is an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and continues to reside in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered and follow the manufacturer's instructions for use. There were 25 opportunities with four errors resulting in a 16% (percent) error rate. This failure applied to two (R18 and R29) of four residents observed during medication administration.Findings include:R18 is an [AGE] year-old, female, admitted in the facility on 06/08/23 with diagnoses of Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis, Other Asthma, and Essential Hypertension. R18's POS (Physician Order Sheet) documented:06/08/23: Advair Diskus Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 250-50 mcg/dose (microgram per dose) (Fluticasone-salmeterol) 1 (one) inhalation inhale orally every 12 hours.12/03/23: Spironolactone tablet 50 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day.08/12/25: Voltaren Gel 1% (percent) (Diclofenac Sodium) apply to both knees and feet topically two times a day for pain 2 (two) gram dose. On 11/17/25 at 10:50 AM, V11 (Registered Nurse, RN) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow discharges policy and change in resident condition policy by not informing the resident in advance of planned hospital transfer (Involuntary Petition), failed to obtain a physicians order for a transfer and failed to document the transfer in the medical record. This failure affects one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. Finding Include: R1 was admitted in the facility on 10/30/24. A [AGE] year old male resident with a BIMS of 15/15. R1 has diagnoses of but not limited to osteoarthritis of Right hip, Type 2 Diabetes, Morbid obesity, and Nicotine Dependence. R1 has a BIMS of 15 (Intact Cognition). On 5/6/25 at 11:32AM, R1 reported that he was sent out last April at 3:30AM, R1 stated he was sound asleep in his room when this night nurse woke him up and said he is going to the hospital. He refused to go because no one told him why he was being transferred to a hospital. R1 reported calling 911 because he wanted the police…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and protect a resident from resident-to-resident verbal abuse. This failure affected two (R1, R2) of five residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Facility reported incident (FRI) dated 3/29/2025 documents: During activities, R1 made inappropriate comments about R2. R1 [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: sleep apnea, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and Congestive heart failure. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents that R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which suggests R1 is cognitively intact. R2 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to fibromyalgia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, and diabetes. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents that R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which suggests that R2 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident (R3) was free of abuse from (R2). This failure affected two of two (R2, R3) residents reviewed for abuse causing emotional distress. Findings include: According to the Electronic Health Record (EHR) R3 had diagnoses including osteoarthritis of knee, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, and long-term use of hypoglycemic agents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed R3's cognition was intact. On 3/28/2025 at 10:27 AM, R3 stated that sometime in the morning of February 26, 2025, while he was standing by the microwave in the dining room, R2 rolled in his wheelchair right past him so R3 started to move to the side to give way when R2 stated Don't move, it's not something I would have done to you Master. I was just reversing roles. R3 responded saying You mean, I'm supposed to be your slave? R3 stated that R2 alluded to him as a slave. R3 stated he was very upset and distraught about the incident so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency. This failure affected one (R3) of one resident reviewed for Abuse. Findings include: According to the Electronic Health Record (EHR) R3 had diagnoses including osteoarthritis of knee, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, and long-term use of hypoglycemic agents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed R3's cognition was intact. On 3/28/2025 at 10:27 AM, R3 stated that sometime in the morning of February 26, 2025, while he was standing by the microwave in the dining room, R2 rolled in his wheelchair right past him so R3 started to move to the side to give way when R2 stated Don't move, it's not something I would have done to you Master. I was just reversing roles. R3 responded saying You mean, I'm supposed to be your slave? R3 stated that R2 alluded to him as a slave. R3 stated he was very upset and distraught about the incident so he went downstairs to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse. This failure affected one (R3) of one resident reviewed for abuse. Findings include: According to the Electronic Health Record (EHR) R3 had diagnoses including osteoarthritis of knee, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, and long-term use of hypoglycemic agents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed R3's cognition was intact. On 3/28/2025 at 10:27 AM, R3 stated that sometime in the morning of February 26, 2025, while he was standing by the microwave in the dining room, R2 rolled in his wheelchair right past him so R3 started to move to the side to give way when R2 stated Don't move, it's not something I would have done to you Master. I was just reversing roles. R3 responded saying You mean, I'm supposed to be your slave? R3 stated that R2 alluded to him as a slave. R3 stated he was very upset and distraught about the incident so he went downstairs to the receptionist and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to the resident right to privacy by staff not knocking on the door before entering a resident's room. This failure affected two (R1, R4) of four residents reviewed for privacy. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnosis that includes and not limited to hypertension, sleep apnea, obesity, right hip osteoarthritis, abnormal, gait and mobility, chronic and congestive heart failure. R4 is [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnosis that includes and not limited to blindness, hypertension, diabetes, right eye surgery, Left eye surgery, Vitrectomy bilaterally. On 2/10/2025 at 12:00PM R1 said, I have concerns with staff coming into my room without knocking on the door or telling who they are. On 2/10/2025 at 12:20PM R4 said, I am blind, and I would like the staff to knock on the door and wait to come in, and when they come in introduce themselves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 16 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to discard expired opened medications from 2nd floor medication room. This failure has the potential to affect all 51 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/21/24 at 10:00am during medication room inspection on the 2nd floor, surveyor observed an open house stock Tuberculin purified Protein Derivative (TB) (5TU/0.1ml) 5ml (milliliters) vial that was about 75-80% full in the medication fridge on the 2nd floor. The vial had an open date of 9/26/24. During medication cart inspection on the 2nd floor, surveyor also observed a bottle of house stock acetaminophen 500mg (milligrams) with no expiration date. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 10:00am, V4 (Registered Nurse) stated that the opened TB vial should be discarded after 30 days and expired medications should be returned to the return bin for pharmacy to pick it up. Facility policy dated 1/2024 reads, medication storage in the facility. Responsible party: Nursing Procedure: 14. outdated, .drug will be immediately withdrawn from stack by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their 3 compartment sink policy by not submerging used utensils in the quat (Quaternary Ammonium Compounds) solution for 60 seconds and the facility failed to follow the Labeling and Dating Foods (Date Marking) Policy by not ensuring sandwiches were dated. This failure has the potential to affect all residents receiving nutrition from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. On 1-22-25 at 11:05 AM, surveyor observed V13 (Cook) submerge used utensil (scraper) into the 3-compartment sink (water compartment) for approximately 2 seconds. Surveyor observed V13 did not submerge the used utensil for 60 seconds in the quat solution. Surveyor observed V13 place the used utensil back into the workstation and then used it to make pureed stuffing. On 1-23-25 at 9:06 AM, V12 (Dietary Supervisor) said the purpose of submerging items in quat solution for 1 minute and air drying to eliminate any bacteria. On 1-22-25 at 11:20 AM, V13 (Cook) said she did not submerge the utensil in the quat solution for 60 seconds. V13 said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor the temperature of the refrigerator unit in resident's room for four of four residents (R2, R3, R13, R16) reviewed for food safety in a sample of 18. Findings include: 1. On 1/21/25 at 10:30am during patient encounter, R3's refrigerator was observed with no temperature log. R3's refrigerator was observed with oranges, blueberries, and nuts. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 10:30am, V6 (Restorative Aide) and V7 (CNA-Certifed Nursing Assistant) all stated that housekeeping checks the resident's refrigerator temperature. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 10:30am, V5 (Housekeeping Director) stated that housekeeping monitor the resident's refrigerator in their rooms. V5 stated that the logs are kept in his office downstairs but was unable to produce any logs as requested. 2. On 1/21/25 at 10:30am during patient encounter, R16's refrigerator was observed with no temperature log. R16's refrigerator was observed with peanut butter. During and interview on 1/21/25 at 10:30am, V6 (Restorative Aide) and V7 (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer to appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Record Review) evaluation and determination for one of five residents (R27) reviewed for PASARR in a sample of 18. Findings include: During record review, R27's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R27 is not currently considered by the state level II PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Record Review) process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition, and active diagnosis of bipolar disorder. On 01/23/2025 at 12:20PM during interview with V17 (Admissions Director), V17 stated all residents coming into the facility must have PASRR Level I from the hospital before being admitted into the facility. V17 stated that she only reviews the determination and if the determination says No Level II Required, she is okay with it. V17 also stated that if the determination says that Refer for Level II Onsite, she informs V9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order on oxygen administration and to replace and safely store oxygen nasal cannula for two of two residents (R7, R35) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 18. Findings include: 1. On 01/21/2025 at 10:22AM during unit rounds, R7 was lying flat on bed, and R7's oxygen nasal cannula was on the floor and not in a plastic bag. R7's oxygen nasal cannula was also not dated, and the oxygen humidifier indicated a date of 12/15/2024. On 01/21/2025 at 10:50AM during observation with V3 (Registered Nurse), R7's oxygen nasal cannula was not in a plastic bag and was on the floor. Also, R7's oxygen nasal cannula was not dated, and the oxygen humidifier indicated a date of 12/15/2024. V3 picked up R7's oxygen nasal cannula and put it in a bag without changing it. At 11:19AM during record review with V3, R7's oxygen order is to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute to maintain O2 (oxygen) saturation at 95% or greater every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow transmission-based practices for one of three residents (R204) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 18. Findings include: On 01/21/2025 at 10:55AM during unit rounds, V18 (Nurse Practitioner) was going out of R204's room with isolation gown on. R204's room has sign that reads Droplet Precaution. On 01/21/2025 at 10:58AM during interview with V18, V18 stated that she left R204's room with isolation gown on but she should have removed it before coming out or R204's room. On 01/23/2025 at 12:40PM during interview with V2 (Acting Director of Nursing), V2 stated that all personal protective equipment should be removed inside the resident's room. V2 stated that R204's room should have both contact and droplet precaution sign. Review of R204's Order Summary Report documents an admission date of 01/17/2025, diagnoses of not limited to influenza due to identified novel influenza A virus with other respiratory manifestations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention measures were in place for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet printed on 11/9/24 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to fracture of 2nd lumbar vertebrae, cerebral infarction, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and hypertension. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has moderate cognitive impairment and requires substantial assistance for transfers. R1's care plan dated 12/28/18 showed, (R1) is at high risk for falls related to impaired mobility, history of cerebrovascular accident, history of falls, and psychotropic drug use .requires use of floor mat to prevent injury from falls, place call light within reach, use wheelchair for locomotion and mobility and ensure device is operable. On 11/9/24 at 10:28AM, R1 was in his bed with his wheelchair and over the bed table next to his bed. R1's floor mat was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure inhalers and insulin are dated when opened as manufacturer's recommendation for five of five residents (R2, R28, R35, R38, R40) reviewed for medication storage and labeling in a sample of 12. Findings include: On 02/15/2024 at 9:50AM during observation with V10 (Registered Nurse), First floor cart was observed with the following: 1. R28's opened and undated fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhalation powder with manufacturer label that reads Discard the inhaler one month after opening the foil pouch or when the counter reads 0 (after all blisters have been used), whichever comes first. 2. R35's opened and undated fluticasone furoate and vilanterol inhalation powder with manufacturer label that reads Discard the inhaler 6 weeks after opening the moisture-protective foil tray or when the counter reads 0 (after all blisters have been used), whichever comes first. 3. R2's opened and undated umeclidinium inhalation powder with label that reads Discard 6 weeks after foil tray opened or when counter reads…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain hand hygiene during puree food preparation for seven of seven residents (R1, R4, R10, R21, R23, R25 and R35) reviewed for pureed diets in a sample of 12 residents. Findings Include: On 2/15/24 at 10:40AM after preparing starch, V8 (Chef) did not change her gloves, V8 was observed to open the oven, scooped out 8 portions of carrots and poured it in a blender. V8 then picked up the blender lid from the working table, covered the blender and proceeded to blend the carrots. After one minute, V8 opened the blender and proceeded to put her used left gloved hand into the blended carrots to check for smoothness. V8 did not change gloves prior to checking for smoothness. During an interview on 2/15/24 at 11:00AM, V8 stated that, she should have changed gloves before checking for smoothness. During an interview on 2/15/24 at 11:00 AM, V5 (Food Service Director) stated that V8 should have changed her gloves before checking for smoothness. Record review indicates R1, R4, R10, R21, R23, R25, and R35 is on a pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy is provided to residents receiving insulin administration for two of three residents (R5, R31) observed for insulin administration in a sample of 12. Findings include: 1. On 02/13/2024 at 12:05PM during medication administration observation with V7 (Registered Nurse), V7 administered insulin to R5's right arm while R31, R5's roommate, was in the room, without pulling the privacy curtain. On 02/13/2024 at 12:16PM V7 stated that she should have pulled the privacy curtain and provided privacy to the R5 before she administered the insulin. On 02/16/2024 at 12:26PM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that she expects all nurses to provide privacy before administration of insulin to residents. Review of R5's order summary report dated 02/16/2024 indicated admission date of 08/04/2011, diagnoses of not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and long term (current) use of insulin, and order for Humalog solution 100 unit/ml (milliliters) per sliding scale with order date of 11/15/2023. 2. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report and initiate an investigation on an allegation of abuse for one of one resident (R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 12. Findings include: On 02/13/2024 at 11:07AM during unit rounds, R3 stated that there are staff who mistreats him, pushing him down to bed, giving him cold showers and taking his tray even if R3 is not done eating yet because R3 eats slow. On 02/13/2024 at 11:10AM during interview with R3 with the presence of V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing), R3 again mentioned that there are staff who pushes him down to bed, giving him cold showers and taking his tray even if R3 is not done eating yet because R3 eats slow. On 02/15/2024 at 10:29AM during interview with V1, V1 stated that he did not report the above-mentioned allegation to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) because R3 has a history of making false allegations. On 2/15/2024 at 11:30AM, V1 stated that he went back to R3 with V11 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) and R3 told him that R3 feels that the staff puts him to bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for one (R31) of three residents observed for insulin administration in a sample of 12. Findings include: On 02/13/2024 at 12:00PM during medication administration observation with V7 (Registered Nurse), V7 was observed checking R31's blood glucose level which came back with a result of 324. V7 was observed preparing to administer 14 units of Aspart with Niacinamide 100 units/ml (milliliters) insulin. V7 checked the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) which indicated order for Aspart with Niacinamide 100 units/ml insulin, 10 units subcutaneously with meals and per sliding scale with blood glucose of between 300 to 349 to give 8 units. At 12:09PM, R31 was observed in her room with lunch tray in front of R31 and V7 was observed administering the prepared 14 units of Aspart with Niacinamide insulin to R31. On 02/13/2024 at 12:00PM during interview with V7, V7 stated that she will only give 14 units of Aspart with Niacinamide insulin to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explicitly state that neither the resident nor his or her representative is required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, the facility for three of three residents (R3, R35, R46) reviewed for arbitration in a sample of 12. Findings include: On 02/16/2024 at 12:10PM during record review, R3, R35, and R46's arbitration agreements were noted without a statement that neither the resident nor his or her representative is required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, the facility. On 02/16/2024 at 12:28PM, during an interview, V9 (admissions and business office manager) said that there is no explicit statement on the agreement indicating that neither the resident nor his or her representative is required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at, the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer Influenza and Pneumococcal immunization to one of five residents (R198) reviewed for immunizations in a sample of 12. Findings include: On 02/15/2024 at 11:50AM during record review, R198's electronic health record indicated that R198 was admitted on [DATE] and did not indicate any recent administration of Influenza and/or Pneumococcal vaccine, immunization refusal or contraindication to any immunization. On 02/15/24 at 3:21PM, during interview with V2 (Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist), V2 stated that R198's hospital records indicated that no Influenza vaccine was given to R198 for 2023-2024 and the last Pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumococcal conjugate 13-Valent) given to R198 was on 10/10/2012. V2 also stated that the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccine should have been offered to R198 upon admission. Review of R198's hospital records indicated administration of Influenza vaccine on 10/10/2012, and administration of Pneumococcal conjugate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a female resident was shaved and free of facial hair for one of four residents (R4) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in the sample of eight. Findings include: On 11/17/23 at 9:49 AM, R4 was in her room lying in bed in her gown. R4 had prominent, long facial (at least one inch) whiskers on her chin. R4 said she does not have a razor to raze the whiskers and would like if the staff would shave them off (of her face). On 11/17/23 at 11:24 AM, V4, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), said resident showers include shaving the resident's face; including the female residents. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R4 has moderate cognitive impairment and requires substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene (including shaving). R4's current Care Plan provided by the facility shows R4 requires assistance by staff with personal hygiene, has impaired cognitive function, and impaired visual function. The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-16 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post daily staffing in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 10:30 AM, and on 2/15/24 at 12:45 PM during observation of the facility lobby and resident floors, no daily nurse staffing posting was displayed. On 2/15/24 at 1:16 PM, during an interview with V2 (Director of Nursing) and V3 (Scheduler), both stated that they do not post daily staffing sheets in the facility. The facility unable to provide posting policy.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$52,199 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $52,199 — penalty dated 2024-01-09
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-03 for 37 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ALIYA HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALIYA GB HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2024 |
| EVASTON NRC REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| WEINFELD, EFRIAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| ALIYA OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| JINDAL, RAJESH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| MARTINEZ, FELIPE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| NRC INVESTMENT GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.