Allure of Geneseo

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 62.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safety of a resident by ensuring the shower room door was closed for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision. This failure resulted in R1 wandering into the shower room and experiencing a slip and fall to the floor and sustaining a laceration to her head and a right femoral fracture. The findings include:R1's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility 11/13/25 with diagnoses to include ataxia, cognitive communication deficit, macular degeneration, depression, chronic kidney disease, and protein calorie malnutrition. R1's facility assessment dated showed she has moderate cognitive impairment, required partial to moderate assistance for transfers, and uses a manual wheelchair for mobility. The facility's report to the state agency dated 3/29/26 showed, . Resident had a fall on 3/28/26, in the shower room. The CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was heating up the water for a resident and left the door open.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-16 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure V5/Dietary Manager possesses the Food Handler Certification or Certified Food Protection Manager certification. This failure has the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility.The facility's Dietary Manager Job Description, not dated, documents: QUALIFICATIONS: Food Handler Certification or Certified Food Protection Manager certification required.The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Form 671-Long-term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, signed 1/13/26, by V1/Administrator, document 62 residents reside in the facility.During the initial kitchen tour, on 1/13/26, at 9:00 a.m., V5 confirmed since being hired, as the Dietary Manager, in October 2025, he has yet to obtain the certification required in the facility's job description.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement antibiotic stewardship by failing to ensure infection surveillance was thoroughly conducted, met the required criteria for antibiotic use and obtain/review culture results to track and trend infections for nine of nine residents (R1, R7, R8, R29, R53, R68, R71-R73) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 71. Findings include:The Infection Surveillance policy dated 6/2023 documents the facility will collect data to properly identify possible communicable diseases or infections among residents by identifying the infection site, pathogen, signs and symptoms and residents' locations. Observations of staff including the identification of ineffective practices, infection trends and patterns. All resident and infections will be tracked. The facility will conduct specimen collection and testing in a manner consistent with standards of practice. Data to be used in the surveillance include laboratory reports, antibiotic use, medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication for one (R8) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 71.Findings include:The facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), undated, documents not in its entirety, It is the intent of this policy to ensure that residents only receive psychotropic medications when other nonpharmacological interventions are clinically contraindicated. Additionally, these medications should only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms and not used for discipline or staff convenience, which would deem it a chemical restraint .Psychotropic medications are to be used only when a practitioner determines that the medication(s) is appropriate to treat a resident's specific, diagnosed, and documented condition and the medication(s) is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care and failed to provide privacy/dignity of one (R53) resident of five residents reviewed for urinary catheters in a sample of 71.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Catheter Care, undated, documents not in its entirety, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use.Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use.Male: Gently grasp penis, draw foreskin back if applicable.R53's admission Record documents R53's date of admission to the facility was 4/21/22 and his diagnoses include but not limited to Hematuria, Unspecified, Chronic Kidney Disease Unspecified, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Retention of Urine, Unspecified, Presence of Urogenital Implants, Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate, and Personal History of Urinary Tract Infections.R53's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to conduct hand hygiene and change gloves per standards of care and don personal protective equipment (PPE) correctly for two of three residents (R40 and R47) reviewed for infection prevention practices in a sample of 71. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Personal Protective Equipment, undated, documents not in its entirety, This facility promotes appropriate use of personal protective equipment to prevent the transmission of pathogens to residents, visitors, and other staff.Change gloves and perform hand hygiene between clean and dirty tasks, when moving from one body part to another, when heavily contaminated or when torn. The Center for Disease Control Sequence for Putting on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) documents to fasten the back of the gown when putting the gown on. The facility's policy titled, Clean Dressing Change, undated, documents not in its entirety, It is the policy of this facility to provide wound care in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident with new onset pain, failed to document the new onset pain, and the facility failed to ensure the resident's provider received notification of new onset pain. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin in the sample of 4. The findings include: R1's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 10/9/24 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, generalized osteoarthritis, overweight, dementia, and a fracture of the lower end femur (thigh bone, onset date 6/24/25). R1's 4/10/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed severe cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15. R1's MDS showed she was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and all types of transfers. R1's MDS showed she received scheduled pain medication; however, she denied pain for the previous six days and she did not receive as-needed pain medication during the review period. R1's June 2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened food items were dated upon opening and ensure areas in the kitchen were clean. This failure has the potential to affect all 63 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Labeling and Dating policy (undated) documents the following: Leftovers and opened foods shall be clearly labeled with date food item is to be discarded. Food items to be labeled and dated include items prepared in house and food items that are opened and stored for later use. On 02/24/25 at 09:50 AM, multiple scattered areas of dust and debris were adhered to the fan covers and surrounding areas of wall and ceiling in the walk-in cooler. V7 (Dietary Manager) confirmed the presence of dust and debris on the fan covers and the surrounding areas of wall and ceiling. On 02/24/25 at 09:55 AM, the reach-in cooler contained a large bag of shredded mild cheddar cheese that was open and did not contain the date it was opened. The reach-in cooler also contained a large, opened salad bag with scattered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by ensuring clothing attire was clean and free of debris for one resident (R47) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 33. Findings include: R47's Minimum Data Set Assessment (dated 02/20/25) documents (in Section C), a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3, indicating R47 is severely cognitively impaired. On 02/26/25 at 11:20 AM, R47 was sitting in a high back wheelchair with V8 (R47's husband) sitting next to her. R47 had a full mechanical lift sling in place underneath of her. V8 pointed to several scattered areas of dried, crusted debris on the lap of R47's pants and stated, I am not sure if they are just not using the (clothing protectors) at breakfast. I keep finding her wearing dirty pants from food spilled on her. The pants she was wearing on Monday (02/24/25) were like this as well. They had areas of dried food that had been spilled all over them. I wish they would change her clothes when they look like this. She would have never kept a dirty pair of pants on if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply physician-ordered compression stockings for one of one resident (R31), with a known history of acute/chronic heart failure, reviewed for edema, in a sample of 33. FINDINGS INCLUDE: R31's facility admission Record documents that R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure; Atrial Fibrillation; Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3; Edema. R31's current Physician Order Sheet, dated February 2025 includes the following orders: (Compression stockings) to bilateral lower extremity, on in AM (morning), off at HS (bedtime) for bilateral lower extremity edema on 9/7/2024. R31's current Care Plan, dated 9/7/24 includes the following Focus Area: (R31) has an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to impaired mobility, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, visual and hearing deficits. Also included are the following Interventions/Tasks: (R31) requires…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided range of motion exercises and contracture alleviation devices to prevent further decline in range of motion and care plan and assess a resident's contracture for three of three residents (R6, R7, R27) reviewed for limitations in range of motion in the sample of 33. Findings include: The facility's Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion policy, dated 8/2024, documents Range of Motion means the full movement potential of a joint. Residents who exhibit limitations in range of motion, initially and thereafter, will be referred to the therapy department for a focused assessment of range of motion. Nursing assistants will report any significant changes in range of motion, as noted during daily care activities, to the resident's nurse when any changes are noted. The assessment should include identified risks which could impact resident's range of motion including, but not limited to; Immobilization, Neurological…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $901K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL