Allure Of The Quad Cities
833 Sixteenth Avenue, Moline, IL 61265 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 149 certified beds · (309) 764-6744 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $356,380 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-01)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.4% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.4% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 9.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 73.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.8% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.4% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.9% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.1% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.40 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.07 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 36.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.5%CMS range 47.4–63.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.3–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 36.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.9–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 124.1 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise a known wandering resident (R1) who was evaluated to be at risk for elopement, failed to remain with an eloped resident (R1) once found out in the community, and failed to assure a secured door was locked preventing access to a wandering resident (R1). These failures resulted in R1, a moderately cognitively impaired resident with the diagnosis of unspecified dementia, eloping from the facility through the Maintenance Office exterior exit door, crossing a moderately busy road to a gas station and park approximately one block from the facility. These failures have the potential to affect all three (R2, R3, R4) Elopement Risk residents who reside off the secured floor in the facility.The Immediate Jeopardy began on April 14, 2026, when R1 eloped from the facility. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on June 5, 2026, at 9:52 AM. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect cognitively impaired residents (R7, R5, R6) from sexual abuse by another resident (R4) with a known pattern of sexually inappropriate behaviors. R4 was observed with her hand on R7's vaginal area. R4 was observed with her whole hand inside R5's pants in his penile area. R4 was observed with her hand in R6's groin moving towards his penile area in a tapping motion up and down. This failure applies to 4 of 13 residents (R4, R7, R5, R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14 and resulted in immediate jeopardy.The Immediate Jeopardy began on 11/22/25 when R4 put a glove on that she took from the nurses' cart, placed her gloved hand onto R7's vaginal area. V16 (Regional Nurse Consultant) was notified of Immediate Jeopardy on 3/13/26 at 3:32 PM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 3/14/26 but noncompliance remains at level two because additional time is needed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an area of pressure for a resident at risk of developing pressure injuries, failed to do a full assessment of the wound when it was identified, and failed to obtain a treatment order when it was first identified for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure in the sample of 11. These failures caused the wound to further deteriorate and become necrotic (non-viable, dead skin tissue).The findings include:R2's admission Record, provided by the facility on 6/17/26, showed he had diagnoses including, but not limited to a fracture of lower end of right tibia, anemia, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, unspecified fracture of sacrum, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot, pain in right leg, abnormal gait and mobility, unspecified fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra, procedure and treatment not carried out because of patient's decision for unspecified reasons, and patient's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement personalized fall prevention measures for a resident (R4) resulting in (R4) obtaining a laceration that required sutures, and the facility failed to prevent a resident (R1) at risk for elopement from exiting the building unsupervised. These failures apply to 2 of 3 residents reviewed for safety in the sample of 6.The findings include:1. R4's electronic face sheet printed on 3/28/26 showed R4 has diagnoses including but not limited to myasthenia gravis, disorientation, dementia without behaviors, and history of falls. R4's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R4 has severe cognitive impairment. R4's nursing progress notes dated 2/18/26 showed, 6:30 AM Fall was not witnessed. Fall occurred in the Resident's room. Resident was attempting to self toilet at time of the fall. Reason for the fall was evident. Reason for fall: Resident stated that she tripped over fall mat located next to bed. Did an injury occur as a result of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a resident from developing Stage 4 pressure wounds, failed to assess the wounds in a timely manner, and failed to implement treatment interventions of the wounds for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure wounds in the sample of 14. These failures resulted in R1 developing wound infections leading to sepsis.The findings include:R1's Face Sheet dated 3/17/26 shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnoses include, but are not limited to, atherosclerotic heart disease, pressure ulcer of left heel, Stage 4, edema, polyneuropathy, pain in right foot, pain in left foot, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, heart failure, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer of the right heel, Stage 4, anorexia, and abnormal weight loss.R1's care plan provided by the facility initiated on 11/3/25 shows he is at risk for impaired skin integrity due to fragile skin, bilateral lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to perform hand hygiene and follow Physician treatment orders for one of four Residents (R12) and follow Physician treatment orders, prevent a worsening pressure ulcer and prevent a newly acquired pressure ulcer for one of four Residents (R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample size of 46. This failure resulted in R3 developing a new in-house pressure ulcer to the left Ischium, a new in-house stage 4 pressure ulcer to right Ischium and increasing in size in stage 4 pressure ulcers to right and left heels.Findings include: The Facility Wound Treatment Management Policy, dated 2025, documents: to promote healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of the Facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders; wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing and frequency of dressing; dressings will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a fractured right ankle. This past non-compliance occurred from 8/21/25 to 8/29/25.The findings include:R1's admission record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness. The 9/4/25 quarterly facility assessment shows R1 to have severe cognitive impairment. The same assessment showed impaired functional abilities to both lower extremities and requires a wheelchair for mobility. She was dependent on 2 or more staff for transfers to and from the chair/bed. The assessment defines dependent as the helper does all of the effort. The resident does none of the effort to complete the activity.R1's progress notes of 8/22/25 at 1:29 PM, documents the nurse was notified of the resident's right ankle being swollen and bruised. The notes show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ordered pain medication timely, for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for pain control, in a sample of three. This failure resulted in R2 experiencing intermittent excruciating pain from 12/12/24 until 12/16/24. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The (undated) facility policy, Pain Management, directs staff to, The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences. Pain Management and Treatment: Pharmacological interventions will follow a systematic approach for selecting medications and doses to treat pain. Opioids will be prescribed and dosed in accordance with professional standards of practice and manufacturers' guidelines to optimize their effectiveness and minimize their adverse consequences. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 1:00 P.M. from a local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered pain medications were available at time of admission for a resident experiencing pain for one of one resident (R145) reviewed for pain in the sample of 48. R145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fractured sacrum, and remained in constant, severe pain for nearly 40 hours before the first dose of her pain medication was administered on 12/03/23. Findings include: On 12/06/23, V2 (Director of Nursing) provided a copy of (contracted pharmacy's) undated policy titled 'New admission Policy & Procedure' and stated this policy is utilized by the facility in collaboration with (contracted pharmacy). This same policy documents the following: Process to provide medications prior to the next scheduled delivery: Review contents of the aforementioned boxes (E box or C box) that are on-site at the facility and with the nurse, confirm needed medications are available. If not, medications will either be: sent STAT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures regarding the reconciliation and management/disposal of controlled substances. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R3 and R4) reviewed for controlled substances in the sample of 11.The findings include:The facility's Final Incident Report (dated 4/30/26) showed, On 4/24/2026 [actual date of discrepancy was 4/23/26, incident was not reported until 4/24/26], during a routine controlled substance count, licensed nursing staff identified two bottles of [antianxiety medication, lorazepam] missing from the medication cart. The medications had documented discontinuation orders for both residents prior to discovery. No discrepancies were identified in medication administration records, and no doses were missed or inappropriately administered. The report identified that the medications had belonged to R3 and R4; however, the medications had been discontinued.The facility's investigation showed R3 and R4's bottles were identical bottles of liquid lorazepam concentrate of 2 milligrams per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store controlled substances behind a double lock allowing activity staff to enter an area with controlled substances. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R3 and R4) reviewed for controlled substances in the sample of 11.The findings include:The facility's Final Incident Report (dated 4/30/26) showed, On 4/24/2026 [actual date of discrepancy was 4/23/26, incident was not reported until 4/24/26], during a routine controlled substance count, licensed nursing staff identified two bottles of [antianxiety medication, lorazepam] missing from the medication cart. The medications had documented discontinuation orders for both residents prior to discovery. No discrepancies were identified in medication administration records, and no doses were missed or inappropriately administered. The report identified that the medications had belonged to R3 and R4; however, the medications had been discontinued.The facility's investigation showed R3 and R4's bottles were identical bottles of liquid lorazepam concentrate of 2 milligrams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document the reason for a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for hospitalization in the sample of 13.The findings include:R1s face sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The same document shows she was discharged on 4/19/26. The nursing progress notes of 4/19/26 do not show the transfer/discharge, why she was discharged , where she was discharged to, and no bed hold issued.On 5/30/26 at 12:22 PM, V6 Registered nurse said when a resident is sent to the hospital, they are given paperwork including, the face sheet, any notes that would be relevant to the transfer, any interventions done prior to the transfer, and an assessment. A note would be put in the record showing who was notified and what was all done. It would be important so other staff can see the information of what took place.On 5/30/26 at 12:30 PM, V2 Director of Nursing stated when a resident is sent out to the hospital for any reason the paperwork…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform weekly assessments for a pressure injury, failed to have an ordered pressure injury treatment in place, and failed to have preventive interventions in place for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R3, R4) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 13.The findings include: 1. R1s face sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and altered mental status. R1s progress note of 1/7/26 documents an open area noted to the sacrum measuring 1 cm by 1 cm (length by width in centimeters). The area cleansed with normal saline, applied xeroform and padded adhesive once daily and (as needed). The progress notes and assessments were reviewed and show no further assessment of the wound. No weekly assessments were noted. On 3/7/26, V5 (former Assistant Director of Nursing) documented she was notified R1 had an open area to her sacrum. The area measured 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered on time and medications were administered under the supervision of the nurse for 1 of 5 residents (R8) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 9.The findings include: On 4/10/26 at 9:58 AM, V11, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), said she is giving R8 her 7:00 AM and 8:00 AM medications. V11 said it's not because she is late, it's because she has 13 (resident) blood sugars (glucose) to check.On 4/10/26 at 10:35 AM, R8 said she has not gotten her pills, her nasal spray, her eye drops, or her inhalers yet today.On 4/10/26 at 11:04 AM, V11 returned to R8's room with a med cup full of pills. R8 dumped the medications into her pudding and swallowed them, then her nasal spray was administered followed by her inhaler. No eye drops were observed being given.On 4/10/26 at 11:07 AM, a white patch dated 4/10 and initialed (indecipherable) with the backing still intact was on R8's overbed table. V11 said the pain patch is supposed to be put on in the morning at 6:00 AM.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin on time, failed to administer the correct insulin dose, and failed to administer a cardiac medication to 2 of 4 residents (R4 and R8) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 9.The findings include:1.On 4/10/26 at 9:58 AM, V11, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) said she is giving R8 her 7:00 AM and 8:00 AM medications. V11 said it's not because she is late, it's because she has 13 (resident) blood sugars (glucose) to check. V11 said R8 has Humalog (a fast-acting insulin) per sliding scale and also has 70 units (of another insulin) scheduled. R8 was observed as she attempted to scan her glucose sensor with her phone. R8 said it didn't work. R8 said she already ate her breakfast. V11 said she will have to check R8's glucose with a finger stick and proceeded to do so. The result shows 326. V11 said she usually doesn't have to worry about checking R8's blood sugar with breakfast because she usually scans her sensor.On 4/10/26 at 10:14 AM, V11 returned to R8's room to give her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident room was sanitary for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for environment in the sample of 9.The findings include:On 4/10/26 at 12:07 PM, resident room [ROOM NUMBER] B had a wall mounted heating/cooling unit under the window. Underneath the unit, along the baseboard there was a section of the drywall that was bumpy and black in color. On 4/10/26 at 12:11 PM. V8 Maintenance, with this surveyor, observed the area in room [ROOM NUMBER] B. V8 said that it was not black mold but was a buildup of dirt and debris from the condensation gathering there from the heating/cooling unit. V8 said moisture sits there and erodes the drywall and the dirt and debris collects there. V8 said the drywall needs to be fixed in that area, it should not be black. R4's Census shows that R4 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]B during her stay at the facility.The facility's Routine Cleaning and Disinfection Policy dated 2025 shows It is the policy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 getting punched in the face by R3 and sustaining an abrasion and swollen lip.The findings include: R2's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility 9/29/25 with diagnoses to include primary generalized osteoarthritis, degenerative disease of nervous system, disorientation, toxic encephalopathy, metabolic encephalopathy, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and legal blindness. R2's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he is severely cognitively impaired and uses a wheelchair for mobility. R3's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility 6/3/25 with diagnoses to include dementia with behavioral disturbance, muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia, lack of coordination, anxiety disorder, depression, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, encephalopathy, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for two of seven residents (R9, R3) reviewed for Abuse/Misappropriation in the sample of 14. The findings include:1.R9's Face Sheet shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including encephalopathy, cellulitis of right and left lower limbs, congestive heart failure, contracture of right and left lower extremity, restlessness and agitation, other chronic pain, low back pain, depression, and localized edema.R9's Order Summary Report dated March 16, 2026, shows an order for Oxycodone (an opioid pain medication) 5 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for pain, oxycodone 5 mg one tablet by mouth two times a day for pain, and oxycodone 5 mg give two tablets by mouth every six hours as needed for pain.R9's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], shows R9 is cognitively intact.On March 17, 2026, at 11:22 AM, R9 said he always has pain in his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication was available for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 3.The findings include:R2 September Treatment Administration Record (TAR) shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right lower leg limited to breakdown of skin, and cellulitis.The TAR shows an order for triamcinolone Acetonide external cream 0.1%, apply to RLE (right lower extremity) open area topically every day shift for wound care.On 9/19/25 at 11:00 AM, V9 Registered Nurse was asked to provide the triamcinolone cream applied to R2's legs. She began searching the medication cart, and the treatment cart and said there was none in stock. She said she applied the antifungal cream instead. She could not recall when she had used the triamcinolone. V9 said it should be in the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure blood pressure monitoring was performed after a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet printed on 7/31/25 showed diagnoses including but not limited to left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis, psychophysiologic insomnia, epileptic syndrome, and cognitive social or emotional deficit following cerebrovascular disease. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed no severe cognitive impairment. The same assessment showed R1 is capable of self-propelling her wheelchair with only supervision or touch assistance from staff. On 7/31/25 at 10:25 AM, R1 was seated in a wheelchair and easily wheeling herself down the hallway using the handrail. R1 was talkative and stated she did recall an incident about a week ago (7/24/25) when she was sitting outside. R1 said the exact details are fuzzy but she remembered staff taking her blood pressure when she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure one resident (R2) was free from sexual abuse and failed to ensure two residents (R3,R4) were free of physical, resident-to-resident abuse of five residents reviewed for abuse in a total sample of five.The Facility's undated Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy documents It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. R1's Medical Record documents that he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to Dementia, Insomnia and repeated falls. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/3/25 documents his BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 9/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R2's Medical Record documents that she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to have documented behaviors to warrant the use of antipsychotic and other psychotropic medications and the facility failed to attempt nonpharmacological interventions prior to using antipsychotic and other psychotropic medications for three residents (R1, R3 and R5) of three residents whose psychotropic medications were reviewed in a total sample of five. The Facility's undated Use of Psychotropic Medication(s) documents It is the intent of this policy to ensure that residents only receive psychotropic medication when other nonpharmacological interventions are clinically contraindicated. Additionally, these medications should only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms and not used for discipline or staff convenience, which would deem it a chemical restraint. The policy defines Adequate indications for use as refers to the identified, documented clinical rational for administering a medication that is based upon an assessment of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one resident (R1) of five residents reviewed for abuse in a total sample of five. The Facility's undated Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy documents It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation: A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation: 2. Exercising caution in handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation (e.g. not tampering or destroying evidence); 3. Investigating different types of alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide resident's medical records when requested for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for medical records in the sample of 4. The findings include: R1's face sheet accessed on 6/13/25 show that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 9/19/24 with diagnosis of Parkinson's. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] show R1 has no cognitive impairment. (BIMS-15) On 6/13/25 at 9:35 AM, via telephone conversation with R1 and V6 (R1's sister). R1 said she wanted to get a copy of her medical records but has not gotten them yet. R1 also wanted this surveyor to speak to V6. V6 said my sister (R1) and I made a call to the Nursing Home a couple of weeks ago and spoke to V7 (Medical Record staff) requesting a copy of R1's medical record. V7 spoke to R1 to get her verbal consent. V7 said she was not sure if R1 was allowed to get a copy of her medical records so she had to ask permission from corporate first then she will call us back. V6 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a physician of a high blood sugar for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for notification in the sample of 4. The findings include: R2's Physician Order Sheet dated 6/2025 show R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 6/1/25 with diagnoses that includes diabetes mellitus and diabetic neuropathy. On 6/13/25 at 9:47 AM, V4 (R2's son) said the time R2 was in the Nursing Home, R2 had been in the Hospital due to his blood sugar either being too high or too low. The family has a Dexcom system that's connected at home and sends triggers when R2's blood sugar is high or low. On 6/1/25 at around 2-3 in the morning, we had a trigger that showed my dad's bloods sugar was high at 400. My stepmom (V10) called the nursing home and requested the Nurse to please notify the doctor due to R1's high blood sugar but the nurse said no and refused to call my dad's physician. On 6/13/25 at 1:08 PM, V3 (Registered Nurse) said she was one of the Nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate shift-to-shift controlled medication counts for all residents that had controlled medications stored on the Station C/Front Hall medication cart in the month of April 2025. This failure has the potential to affect 27 residents (R2, R6-R41). Findings include: Facility Policy/Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability dated 2025 documents: It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility shall have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure. Inventory Verification: For areas without automated dispensing systems, two licensed nurses account for all controlled substances and access keys at the end of each shift. Medication Dispense History Report dated 4/1/25 to 4/30/25 indicates R2 and R6 - R41 had controlled medications stored in the Station C/Front medication cart. Narcotic and Controlled Substance Shift-To-Shift Count…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the theft of controlled medications for one resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of property in the sample of 15. Findings include: Facility Policy/Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2025 documents: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Misappropriation of Resident Property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent, use of a resident's belongings or money without resident consent. Facility Policy/Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability dated 2025 documents: It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility shall have safeguards in place in order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a urine specimen according to physician orders for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for implementing physician orders in the sample of 15. Findings include: NP (Nurse Practitioner) Note dated 4/28/25 at 10:22am indicates R1 Complaining of occasional burning pains with urination for a few days. Note indicates R1 has chronic urinary incontinence, chronic overactive bladder and history of UTI's (Urinary Tract Infections). Note Assessment and Plan indicates (obtain) UA (urinalysis) with C&S (Culture and Sensitivity) if indicted. R1's Physician Order dated 4/28/25 indicates Obtain urine sample for UA, C&S. May straight cath(eter) every shift for 2 Days. Progress Note dated 4/30/25 at 12:32am indicates Obtain urine sample for UA, C&S. May straight cath(eter) every shift for 2 Days sample contaminated. Progress Note dated 5/4/25 at 3:50pm indicates UA obtained per straight cath(eter) using sterile procedure, 100ml (milliliters) of turbid, viscous, foul smelling urine returned. (R1's) daughter at bedside and is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to utilize two staff members when transferring residents with a mechanical lift for two (R1 and R2) of four residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers in the sample of eight. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Safe Resident Handling/Transfers, not dated, documents, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable experience for the resident while keeping the employees safe in accordance with current standards and guidelines. Policy Explanation: All residents require safe handling when transferred to prevent or minimize the risk for injury to themselves and the employees that assist them. While manual lifting techniques may be utilized dependent upon the resident's condition and mobility, the use of mechanical lifts are a safer alternative and should be used. Compliance Guidelines: 10. Two staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-15 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure quality assurance meetings were held quarterly and that the facility medical director attended quality assurance meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 94 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: A facility policy, entitled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), undated, document, It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life and addresses all the care and unique services the facility provides; and 1. The QAPI program includes the establishment of a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee and a written QAPI plan. 2 The QAA committee shall be interdisciplinary and shall: a, Consist at a minimum of: i. The director of nursing services, ii. the medical director or his/her/designee; iii. At least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of which must be the Administrator, owner, a board member, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents electronic medical records and care plans matched the Physician's Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) code status for three of five residents (R25, R69, R74) reviewed for Advanced Directives in a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: The facility's Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives policy, undated, documented It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive. 9. Any decision making regarding the resident's choices will be documented in the resident's medical record and communicated to the interdisciplinary team and staff responsible for the resident. The Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form's section A has two options to choose from if the patient has NO pulse: attempt CPR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise an antipsychotic medication care plan and a dialysis care plan for two residents (R12, R23) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans in the sample of 39. Findings include: Facility Policy/Comprehensive Care Plans dated 2024 document, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment. Current Physician Order Summary Report indicates R12 receives: Clozapine (atypical Antipsychotic) 25mg (milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 2 hours as needed for Neuromuscular with Lewy Body Dementia (as needed can take 2 hours up to 3 Tabs in 24 hours) (re-order date 11/15/24); Clozapine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure physician orders for dialysis were written and communication sheets were completed for two of two residents reviewed for dialysis (R23, R87) in a sample of 39. Findings include: A facility policy titled Hemodialysis, 2023 documents, This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis. A section titled Purpose documents: The facility will assure that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. This will include: The ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. Ongoing assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer a medication to prevent EPS (Extrapyramidal Symptoms) in conjunction with an antipsychotic medication according to physician orders for one resident (R12) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 39. Findings include: Facility Policy/Medication Errors dated 2024 document, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medication errors. The facility shall ensure medications will be administered as follows: According to physician orders. In accordance with accepted standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services. Medication errors once identified will be evaluated to determine if considered significant or not by utilizing the following three general guidelines: Resident Condition Drug Category Frequency of Error - If an error is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed for one resident (R78) of two residents reviewed for infection control in a total sample of 39. Findings include: An undated policy, entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) document, It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Definitions: Enhanced barrier precautions refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. The policy further documents, 4. High-contact resident care activities include dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes, hemodialysis catheters, peripherally inserted central catheters, midline catheters and wound care. R78's November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R1) was free of mistreatment of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Facility Policy/Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2023 documents: The facility will develop and implement written policies that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse. Mental Abuse includes, but is not limited to, humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment or deprivation. Mistreatment means inappropriate treatment or exploitation of a resident. Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to initiate and implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 24 residents (R1, R2, R3, R6, R8 - R27) reviewed for Infection Control practices of 26 residents reviewed. This failure has the potential to affect all 95 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Facility Policy/Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 3/2024 documents: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities. Prompt recognition of need: All staff receive training on enhanced barrier precautions upon hire and at least annually and are expected to comply with all designated precautions. Initiation of Enhanced Barrier precautions: An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property for one resident (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property in the sample of 8. Findings Include: Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability, dated 2023, documents the following. It is the policy of this facility to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place to prevent loss, diversion, or accidental exposure. The Facility Reported Incident, with Date of Occurrence dated: 1/19/2024, Incident Category: Resident Misappropriation of Property/Theft. Incident Description: Missing medications noted for R1. Per Pharmacy: Hydrocodone 5/325MG (Narcotic pain reliever) with a quantity of (89) tablets delivered on 1/5/2024. V3/Unit Manager signed for the medication and processed them in. V3 states there were 2 cards, one with a quantity of (44) tablets and the second card with (45) tablets. V3 said V3 placed both narcotic cards in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent an occurrence of staff-to-resident verbal abuse from occurring for one of three residents (R1), reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings Include: The undated facility policy, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation documents, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident altercations. It also includes verbal abuse. Verbal abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy of immediately reporting potential abuse, protecting a resident from further potential abuse, and investigating an allegation of potential abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The undated facility policy, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, directs staff, The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property; and Establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegation. On 01/25/24 at 8:26 A.M., V1/Administrator, Abuse Coordinator stated, I became aware of a situation (potential verbal abuse 12/21/23 at 6:15 P.M.) between (R1) and (V8/Certified Nursing Assistant) on 12/22/23 at around 8:15 AM. I didn't report the incident to the (state agency), suspend the (CNA V8/Certified Nursing Assistant) or begin an investigation until 12/22/23 at 9:15 A.M. The (facility) Investigation Report, dated 12/22/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to failed to ensure one allegation of abuse was immediately reported to the Administrator for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse, in the sample of 6. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility Incident Initial Report, dated 12/22/23 and completed by V1/Administrator documents, At 8:15 AM, (R1) reported that a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) named '(V8/Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA)' refused to give (R1) coffee when (R1) requested it after the supper meal. When (R1) went to pour it himself, (V8/CNA) smacked (R1's) hand and told (R1) no. (R1) assessed for injury, none noted, and (R1) denies pain at this time. CNA identified as (V8) and suspended immediately, pending investigation. POA (Power of Attorney) and Physician notified. Investigation initiated. On 01/25/24 at 8:26 A.M., V1/Administrator, Abuse Coordinator stated, I became aware of a situation (potential verbal and/or physical abuse 12/21/23 at 6:15 P.M.) between (R1) and (V8/Certified Nursing Assistant) on 12/22/23 at around 8:15 AM. I didn't report the incident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident council with responses, actions, and rationales taken regarding their concerns. This has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Resident and Family Grievances policy, dated 2023, documents, Grievances may be voiced in the following forums: Verbal complaint to a staff member or Grievance Official; Written complaint to a staff member or Grievance Official; Written complaint to an outside party; Verbal complaint during resident or family council meetings; Via the company toll free Customer Service line. The Grievance Official will take steps to resolve the grievance, and record information about the grievance, and those actions, on the grievance form: Steps to resolve the grievance may involve forwarding the grievance to the appropriate department manager for follow up; All staff involved in the grievance investigation or resolution should make prompt efforts to resolve the grievance and return the grievance form to the Grievance Official.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of staff to provide assistance to dependent residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff policy, dated 2/23, documents, It is the policy of this facility to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility's census, acuity, and diagnoses of the resident population will be considered based on the facility assessment. The facility's Call lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, dated 2/23, documents, All staff who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff member cannot provide what the resident desires, the appropriate personnel should be notified. On 12/06/23 at 11:09 a.m., during the survey resident council meeting the following resident statements were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature. This has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Resident Council Minutes, dated 9/26/23, document that the residents have concerns with the food being cold. On 12/05/23 at 11:30 AM, upon entering the kitchen two insulated meal cart's doors were open. and contained trays of meals. One cart contained meals that were not on a hot plate. On 12/05/23 from 11:30 to 11:45 AM, throughout this observation, V4 (Dietary Manager) was present. The two meal cart doors remained open, and the one cart of meals were not on hot plates. V4 stated, All of our meals are sent out on carts and taken to the halls. All of the plates should be on top of a hot plate and covered with an insulated cover. The meal cart that is open and has no hot plates is the Arcadia Hall trays. The meal cart doors should always be closed to keep the heat in. V4 yelled to her staff, Why aren't Arcadia plates on hot plates? V21 replied, We don't have enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize signs and symptoms of illness of facility staff and residents as a possible contagious illness (RSV, COVID-19, Influenza), failed to perform the required COVID-19 testing on staff and residents actively demonstrating signs and symptoms of a possible infectious respiratory illness, failed to test for other infectious respiratory illnesses (RSV and influenza) when a COVID-19 test was negative, failed to implement isolation precautions with symptomatic residents, and failed to ensure a surgical mask covered the staffs' mouth and nose while serving food. These failures had the potential to affect all 96 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, dated 5/8/23, documents, Anyone with even mild symptoms of COVID-19, regardless of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-08 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to designate an onsite staff member as Infection Preventionist. This has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Committee Meeting Attendance Records, dated 3/7/23, 6/6/23, and 9/5/23, document that V12 (Regional Nurse) is the Infection Preventionist. On 12/04/23 at 02:53 PM, V1 (Administrator in Training) stated, (V2/ Director of Nursing) is currently being trained to become our Infection Preventionist. V12 is an Infection Preventionist, but she doesn't work in our building on a full time basis. She is training (V2). On 12/05/23 at 10:15 AM, V2 stated, Our outbreak started on 11/10/23 when a staff member tested positive. I'm the Infection Preventionist, but I haven't completed the Infection Preventionist training yet. During this outbreak, we've had 24 residents and 24 staff test positive for COVID. On 12/07/23 at 11:01 AM, V12 stated, I have been filling in as the Infection Preventionist since March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a smoke detector was not covered causing it to be inoperable and not providing smoke protection. This failure has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: According to the National Safety Council, dated 2023, about three out of five fire deaths happen in homes without working smoke alarms. Smoke alarms are a key part of a home fire escape plan providing early warning to reduce your risk of dying in a fire. On 12/04/23 at 10:45 AM, a fire alarm was installed on the ceiling of the kitchen located near the exhaust hood (approximately five feet). The fire alarm was covered with clear plastic, and the plastic was secured around the alarm's perimeter with painter's tape. V4 (Dietary Manager) stated, We have the fire alarm covered with the plastic, because if we do not keep it covered, it will alarm every time we open the steamer, and then the fire department has to come to the building. On 12/4/23 at 2:25 p.m., V4 stated, We removed the plastic from the smoke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity by serving their meal fluids in disposable cups. This has the potential to affect all 29 residents (R2, R4, R5, R7, R11, R13, R17, R19, R22, R28, R30, R32, R33, R40, R42, R45, R54, R56, R60, R63, R65, R66, R68, R69, R71, R77, R80, R87, R295) residing on the Arcadia unit in the sample of 48. Findings include: The facility's Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy, dated 2/23, documents, It is the practices of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. On 12/05/23 at 12:00 PM, the Arcadia meal tray cart was outside of the dining room. Staff were serving the residents their meal trays. Residents were served their milk, water, and juice in disposable clear cups and disposable Styrofoam cups. On 12/05/23 at 12:16 PM, V23 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion exercises for one of one resident (R25) with a known history of limited range of motion, in a sample of 48. Findings include: The (undated) facility policy, Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion, directs staff, residents who enter the facility without limited range of motion will not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable. Staff will be educated on basic, restorative nursing care. This training may include: Assisting residents with range of motion exercises, performing passive range of motion for residents unable to participate. General Guidelines for Range of Motion: Explain the procedure to the resident then ask permission to proceed. Move each joint through its range of motion three times unless otherwise instructed. Move each joint gently, smoothly, and slowly through its range of motion. Stop an exercise before the point of pain. Report pain to the nurse. R25's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to check placement of a gastrostomy feeding tube prior to the administration of fluids and medications; and failed to flush a gastrostomy feeding tube with the prescribed water flushes between medications for one of one resident (R70), reviewed for feeding tubes, in a sample of 48. Findings include: The (undated) facility policy, Medication Administration via Enteral Tube directs staff, It is the facility policy to ensure the safe and effective administration of medications via enteral feeding tubes by utilizing best practice guidelines. Enteral tube placement must be verified prior to administering any fluids or medication. Flush enteral tube with at least 15 ML (milliliters) of water prior to administering medications unless otherwise ordered by prescriber. Dilute the solid or liquid medication as appropriate and administer using a clean oral syringe. Flush tube again with at least 15 ML of water taking into account resident's volume status. Repeat with next medication. Flush the tube with a final flush of at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was available upon admission for a resident with reports of pain for one of one resident (R145) reviewed for pain in the sample of 48. Findings include: On 12/06/23, V2 (Director of Nursing) provided a copy of (contracted pharmacy's) undated policy titled 'New admission Policy & Procedure' and stated this policy is utilized by the facility in collaboration with (contracted pharmacy). This same policy documents the following: Process to provide medications prior to the next scheduled delivery: Review contents of the aforementioned boxes (E box or C box) that are on-site at the facility and with the nurse, confirm needed medications are available. If not, medications will either be: sent STAT (immediately) from the pharmacy or called into a local pharmacy and a courier scheduled by pharmacy will pick up the medication and deliver to the facility. If there is a control necessary and we do not have the medication or we…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a rational for the continued use of an antibiotic for one of one resident (R25) reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 48. Findings Include: The (undated) facility policy, Antibiotic Stewardship Program directs staff, The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. All prescriptions for antibiotics shall specify the dose, duration and indication for use. R25's Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/5/2023 includes the following medication: Cefdinir Capsule 300 MG Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for maintenance. No stop date is included for the antibiotic usage. On 12/4/23 at 3:09 P.M., V2/Director of Nurses stated, (R25) is on continuous antibiotics due to recurrent knee wound infections. I didn't realize the antibiotic was started that long ago. There is no stop date for the medication. On 12/5/2023 at 8:10 A.M., V8/Wound Doctor stated, I have no idea why (R25) is on a maintenance dose of antibiotic. (R25) doesn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were prescribed appropriately for one of one resident (R25) reviewed for antibiotic use in the sample of 48. Findings include: The facility's Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Stewardship Program policy (dated 11/28/17) documents the following: This facility is dedicated to implementing an Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Stewardship program to reduce the use of antibiotics. This program helps ensure that our residents get the right antibiotics at the right time for the right duration, and can improve individual patient outcomes, prevent deaths from resistant infections, slow antibiotic resistance, decrease Clostridium difficile infections, and healthcare costs. This policy also documents, Review the clinical record for new antibiotic starts to determine whether the clinical assessment, prescription documentation and antibiotic selection were in accordance with the antibiotic stewardship practices. When conducted over time, monitoring process measures can assess whether antibiotic prescribing policies are being followed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify specific target behaviors; and monitor and track behaviors for three residents (R2, R55, R69) of four residents reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 21 residents. Findings include: The Facility's Psychotropic drug use policy dated 5/20/2022 documents Long-term care residents with dementia commonly display behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, such as agitation, wandering, aggression, and sleep disturbances, resulting in treatment with psychotropic drugs. A psychotropic drug is defined as any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors. - Identify the date, time, and location of the resident's specific behavior that's causing concern as well as any identified triggers. Gather information from staff members who have witnessed the behavior. - Use a behavior monitoring tool to identify the frequency, intensity, duration, and impact of the resident's behavior. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$356,380 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $22,900 — penalty dated 2026-06-01
- $38,590 — penalty dated 2026-06-01
- $245,440 — penalty dated 2026-03-17
- $19,135 — penalty dated 2025-11-20
- $19,135 — penalty dated 2025-11-20
- $11,180 — penalty dated 2023-12-08
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-05 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MN1 MANAGEMENT CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 30% | since 02/01/2023 |
| GOLDBERG, JEREMY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 30% | since 02/01/2023 |
| OSEROFF, MEYER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 30% | since 02/01/2023 |
| WENGROW, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 02/01/2023 |
| NUDELL, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 30% | since 02/01/2023 |
| BLOOMHUFF, ERIKA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| MEYER, SAMANTHA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $607K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145027. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.