Allure Of Pinecrest
414 South Wesley Avenue, Mount Morris, IL 61054 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 125 certified beds · (815) 734-4103 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $188,633 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 82.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.2% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.9% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.3% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.8% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.41 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.63 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.1%CMS range 48.5–71.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 7.3–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.7%CMS range 3.2–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.84 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 92.8 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor a resident that experienced a change in condition and failed to implement interventions as ordered by the physician resulting in the death of one of 18 residents (R93) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 18. The Immediate Jeopardy began on April 27, 2024 at 11:00 AM when V9 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported a change in condition to V10 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and V10 instructed V9 to wait until R93's lunch tray arrives. V1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on May 9, 2024 at 11:08 AM. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on May 10, 2024 at 10:00 AM, but non compliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the inservice training. The findings include: R93's admission Record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including mild intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-13 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide documentation showing staff was qualified to replace a gastrostomy tube (g-tube) per standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for staff qualifications in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1's g-tube migrating into the small intestines leading to complications requiring hospitalization.Findings Include: On 4/13/26 at 12:10 PM, V1 (Administrator) said she did not know if V2 had any certification or training on changing a urinary catheter g-tube and to ask V2 directly. On 4/13/26 at 12:16 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said she was not sure what prompted R1's urinary catheter g-tube to be changed, the nurse approached her and said the family wanted her to change it. V2 said it was a routine procedure, a standing order, and she didn't speak with V10 (R1's Physician). V2 said she replaced R1's 16 French with a 20 French urinary catheter because R1's stoma had stretched and the 20 French and the feeding would go in easier.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor a urinary catheter gastrostomy tube (g-tube) placement, failed to have policies in place for the care of a urinary catheter g-tube, and failed to have polices in place for replacing a urinary catheter g-tube for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for gastrostomy tubes in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1's being hospitalized due to her gastrostomy tube advancing into her small intestine causing a partial small bowel obstruction and pancreatitis.Findings Include: On 4/9/26 at 10:09 AM, V13 (R1's son) said after R1's g-tube was replaced, the tube was leaking. The only part of the tube sticking out of R1 was the nipple on the end. V9 and V2 were at the bedside looking at R1's g-tube. V2 asked him if he did this, which he told her no. Shortly after R1 was sent to the emergency room. V13 said R1 was exhibiting pain and the tube feeding was leaking all over. On 4/9/26 at 12:22 PM, R1 was sitting in a wheelchair at the nurses'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain the necessary weights on residents (R1, R5) with diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF). The facility failed to obtain and complete the necessary lab work on resident (R1) with diagnoses of CHF and chronic kidney disease. These failures contributed to R1 being re-hospitalized with diagnoses of fluid overload and an exacerbation of CHF. These failures apply to 2 of 5 residents (R1, R5) reviewed for necessary care and services in the sample of 5. The findings include: 1. R1's hospital discharge instructions dated 12/20/23 showed R1 was hospitalized , from 12/10/23-12/20/23, due to bacterial endocarditis (infection around the heart) and respiratory failure. The discharge instructions also showed R1 had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic kidney disease. The instructions showed R1 was discharged to the facility on [DATE], for skilled therapy and rehab services, with an order for, Labs: CBC (complete blood count), Creatinine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered for one of three residents (R64) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 18. This failure contributed to R64 experiencing a 11.41% weight loss in the last six months. The findings include: R64's Order Summary Report dated May 7, 2024, shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including wandering, generalized anxiety disorder, history of falling, depression, alzheimer's disease, dementia, need for assistance with personal care, and difficulty walking. R64 has pudding with lunch ordered on December 15, 2023, and health shake three times per day ordered on October 3, 2023. R64's meal ticket shows for R64 should have received a mighty vanilla shake and a pudding cup at lunchtime. On May 7, 2024, at 12:10 PM, R64 was sitting at the lunch table for her lunch meal. R64 had a general diet food tray in front of her and was eating small bites of food with her fingers. There was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety while using a mechanical stand lift machine for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 having a decline in the ability to raise her left arm, and R1's Physician diagnosing R1 with a complete rotator cuff tear. The findings include: R1's admission Record, printed by the facility on 11/8/23, showed she had diagnoses including enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C-diff), generalized osteoarthritis, hypertension, a history of falling, iron deficiency anemia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, seizures, unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, and weakness. R1's care plan, with a revision date of 11/8/23, showed R1 requires sit to stand by staff to transfer. R1's alteration in skin integrity care plan, with a revision on 11/1/23, showed R1 received a skin tear measuring 0.5 cm (centimeters) x 0.3 cm. Skin is very fragile. Cleansed and dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R12) with a change of condition was assessed and monitored after exhibiting an altered mental status. This failure resulted in R12 being admitted to the hospital with, hypoglycemia and sepsis related to a UTI (urinary tract infection). The facility also failed to ensure a resident received x-ray services without any delay for R57 following a fall. This failure resulted in R57 waiting 18 hours for an x-ray, and the x-ray showed a fractured hip requiring surgical intervention. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R12, R57) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R12's admission record documents her admission date to be 5/12/23 with a most recent hospitalization of 7/15/23 to 7/24/23. The diagnoses list includes morbid obesity, need for assistance with personal care, and protein-calorie malnutrition. A diagnosis of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) was added 7/24/23. The 7/13/23 office clinic notes for V15 FNP (Family Nurse Practitioner) documents R12 has had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a pressure injury before becoming a Stage 2 or greater and failed to provide initial wound assessments for 2 of 4 residents (R14, R5) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 18. This failure resulted in R14 developing two Stage 2 and one Stage 3 pressure injuries. The findings include: 1. On 8/1/23 (between breakfast and lunch), R14 was in his room in his wheelchair. At 12:22 PM, R14 was self-propelling in his wheelchair after leaving the dining room. On 8-/1-8/3/23, this surveyor had no observations of R14 in any other position than up in his chair. On 08/01/23 at 1:10 PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility could not provide a list of residents with wounds (pressure or non-pressure). V2 said the facility did not have a wound nurse and nobody did wound tracking at this time. It fell through the cracks during COVID and was to be a focus this August. V2 was unable to provide the date R14's wounds were first noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document resident assessments for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of 3.The findings include:R1s face sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, transient cerebral ischemic attack, atrial fibrillation, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and hypertension.R1s nursing progress notes for [DATE] document at 9:23 AM, resident observed during medication administration to have difficulty swallowing a pill and began exhibiting signs of choking. The Heimlich maneuver was performed, abdominal thrust, CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) was initiated, and she was sent to the emergency room. The record did not indicate R1s return, her assessment upon return including vital signs or any new orders from the emergency department.On [DATE] at 12:47 PM, V3 Licensed Practical Nurse LPN said I want to say I was still her nurse when she came back and definitely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4.Findings Include:On 4/9/26 at 12:14 PM, V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said R1 is alert to self only and is dependent on staff for all care. V3 said R1 is nonverbal and cries out often. V3 said R1 is incontinent of bowel and bladder. On 4/9/26 at 12:22 PM, R1 was sitting in a wheelchair in the nurses' station. R1 was alert and looking around the room but did not respond when spoken to.On 4/9/26 at 2:16 PM, V6 (CNA) said she asked V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) to help her change R1 who had been incontinent of stool. V6 said they both entered the room together and V7 was not aware that V13 (R1's son) was sitting in the corner of the room. V6 said V7 spoke out loud, this sh*t is getting old, here we go again, you are acting like a child. I should leave you here naked. V6 said later in the shift, V7 told her she did not know V13 was in the room. V6 said told V7 that is why you watch what you say.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4.Findings Include:On 4/9/26 at 2:16 PM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said she asked V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) to help her change R1 who had been incontinent of stool. V6 said they both entered the room together and V7 was not aware that V13 (R1's son) was sitting in the corner of the room. V6 said V7 spoke out loud, this sh*t is getting old, here we go again, you are acting like a child. I should leave you here naked. V6 said V7 was inappropriate and said things that she wouldn't say to her own child. V6 said she talked to someone about it that day but was not sure who. V6 said it is not appropriate to talk to residents that way. On 4/9/26 at 2:52 PM, V1 (Administrator) said V8 reported to her that V7 was inappropriate and used curse words when providing care for R1. V1 said she went and talked to V13, who told her V7 was inappropriate and asked her to educate the nurses. V1 said since V13 didn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was investigated for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4.Findings Include: On 4/9/26 at 2:16 PM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said she asked V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) to help her change R1 who had been incontinent of stool. V6 said they both entered the room together and V7 was not aware that V13 (R1's son) was sitting in the corner of the room. V6 said V7 spoke out loud, this sh*t is getting old, here we go again, you are acting like a child. I should leave you here naked. V6 said V7 was inappropriate and said things that she wouldn't say to her own child. V6 said she talked to someone about it that day but could not recall whom. V6 said it is not appropriate to talk to residents that way. On 4/9/26 at 2:52 PM, V1 (Administrator) said V8 reported to her that V7 was inappropriate and used curse words when providing care for R1. V1 said she went and talked to V13, who told her V7 was inappropriate and asked her to educate the nurses. V1 said since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessed elopement interventions were in place for 3 of 3 sampled residents (R1, R2, R3) at risk for elopement and failed to ensure the elopement alert system was implemented at exit doors in resident areas. These failures resulted in R1 exiting through a resident wing door on 3/26/26 at 5:35 AM and found by staff at 5:38 AM walking outside in the dark approximately 50 feet down the facility's sidewalk with a slope to the right side, without a walker, and without wearing her elopement alert bracelet or temperature appropriate clothing.Findings include:1. On 4/1/26 at 9:00 AM, the facility's wing 3 had an exit door at the end of the hall. This exit door had a banner with a stop sign across the door, attached to each side of the door frame. This surveyor opened the door, and an alarm was heard overhead wing 3 door open. There was a sidewalk beyond the door that went straight out approximately 20 feet and then turned sharply left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from leaving the facility unsupervised for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 3.The findings include:On 3/12/26 at 11:50 AM, R1 was in her room with V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN). R1 was heard screaming. V14 was attempting to help R1 zip her coat. R1 was adamant about wearing her coat, even though she was inside the building. V14 was attempting to get R1 to lay in bed for some rest. R1 was resistive and back up wandering out into the hall. V14 said she was assigned to provide one on one supervision for R1 today. R1 continued to ambulate throughout the unit and was very difficult to redirect. R1's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, hypertension, insomnia, and disorders of muscle. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation of a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy in the sample of 4.The Findings include:R3's face sheet documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including gastrostomy status, and cognitive communication deficit. R3's 1/9/26 care plan documents she requires a tube feeding related to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).The 2/1/26 emergency department documents R3 arrived at 5:36 AM with a chief complaint of a pulled out feeding tube. The notes show a temporary tube was placed with an outpatient procedure to be scheduled to replace the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).R3s facility record was reviewed and had no details relating to an incident of R3s PEG tube being dislodged or coming out. The notes do not show she left the facility. On 2/10/26 at 12:06 PM, V5 certified nursing assistant said during her rounds last week,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the wound care provider of a resident's critical lab value prior to wound care. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for notification in the sample of 5. The findings include:R1's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an admission date of 8/12/25 with diagnoses to include but not limited to stage four pressure ulcer to the left heel, atrial fibrillation (rapid/irregular heartbeat), and left hip fracture. R1's Face Sheet showed she was discharged from the facility on 11/6/25. R1's October 2025 electronic medication administration record (eMAR) showed an order for 3 milligrams of Warfarin (anticoagulant) to be given at bedtime. The eMAR showed the order was started on 9/23/25; it was not given on 10/8/25 then the order was discontinued on 10/9/25. R1's Lab Result Report from 10/8/25 collected at 6:32 AM and reported at 5:26 PM showed her International Normalized Ratio (INR, a lab result used to measure a person's ability to clot and is used to determine therapeutic dosages of anticoagulants like Warfarin.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety and supervision was maintained for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for elopement in the sample of 3. The findings include:On 8/6/2025 R1 was observed in the activity room, sitting in a recliner. R1 looked at surveyor and smiled when surveyor waved at him. R1 was observed at 3:46 PM in the dining room in another activity. R1 was sitting at a table with other residents and their family. R1 was smiling while sitting at the table. R2 was observed on 8/6/2025 sleeping while sitting up, on a couch on the 300 wing. R2 was observed on 8/7/2025 during the lunch meal eating. V2 (unit coordinator/social services) was sitting next to R2 encouraging intakes. R2 was observed being assisted with walking to his room and being provided personal cares. R2 was resistive to care at first, but staff were able to convince R2 to allow them to assist him. On 8/6/2025 at 3:07 PM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) said she was not working when the incidents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pureed pork was pureed to a pudding-like consistency. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R390, R60, R339, R1) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 19. The findings include: Facility provided list of residents on a pureed diet shows R390, R60, R339, and R1 receive pureed diets. On 4/28/25 at 10:04 AM, V13 (Cook) started the puree process for the pureed pork. V13 measured out and weighed enough pork for four servings of pureed pork. V13 placed the pork into a blender pitcher with broth and started to puree the pork. At 10:09 AM, V13 stopped the blender and tested the consistency. V13 said it wasn't quite ready at that time and that the pork tends to be a little stringy and more difficult to puree. At 10:10 AM, V13 stopped the blender, tested it a second time and said it was much better. V13 placed the pureed pork into a food service pan and into the oven. On 4/28/25 at 10:11 AM, the first finished batch of pureed pork appeared to be lumpy as V13 scooped it into the food service pan. On 4/28/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were issued an advanced beneficiary notice form. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R9, R83, and R289) reviewed for beneficiary notices in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R9's NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) form signed on 3/6/25 shows R9's last covered day of services from Medicare Part A was 3/8/25. Facility completed SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form for R9 shows that R9 was provided a NOMNC form but was not provided an ABN (Advance Beneficiary Notice) form. R9's census profile shows R9 still resides in the facility and is using personal insurance is R9's payer source. 2. R83's NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) form signed on 2/21/25 shows R83's last covered day of services from Medicare Part A was 2/23/25. Facility completed SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form for R83 shows that R83 was provided a NOMNC form but was not provided an ABN (Advance Beneficiary Notice) form. R83's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living (ADL) assistance was provided for a dependent resident for 1 of 19 residents (R40) reviewed for ADLs in the sample of 19. The findings include: R40's admission Record dated April 29, 2025, shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, and alzheimer's disease. R40's Care Plan initiated January 6, 2025, shows R40 has an ADL self-care performance deficit. On April 28, 2025, at 10:06 AM, V4 and V5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) went into R40's room to provide incontinence care. R40 told V4 and V5, I'm wet. V4 CNA told this surveyor that R40 was a get up. Meaning R40 should have been gotten up by night shift early in the morning. V4 removed R40's incontinence brief. There was a thick incontinence pad inside of R40's incontinence brief. Both the pad and R40's incontinence brief were saturated with dark urine from front to back. V4 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to initiate a pre-surgical order for a resident prior to his abdominal surgery. The facility failed to implement treatment orders for a resident with compression fractures of her spine. These failures apply to 2 of 19 residents (R43 and R390) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R43's admission Record showed R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, atrial fibrillation (a-fib), and long-term use of anticoagulation medications. R43's current care plan showed R43 was cognitively impaired related to his diagnoses of dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. R43's December 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed R43 was prescribed Pradaxa 150mg (milligrams), give one tablet twice a day for anticoagulation therapy related to his diagnosis of a-fib. On 4/28/25 at 1:15 PM, V14 (Family of R43) stated, My biggest concern is the lack of communication at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred in a safe manner for 2 of 19 residents (R30 and R40) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R30's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 4/15/25 showed R30 was at risk for falls due to her history of falls, decreased muscular coordination, and use of ambulatory assistive devices. R30's Restorative assessment dated [DATE] showed R30 required the assistance of one staff member for transfers and toileting. On 4/28/25 at 9:45 AM, R30 was seated in a recliner in her room. R30 told V18 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) that she needed to go to the bathroom. V18 CNA transferred R30 from the recliner to a wheelchair by holding onto the waistband of R30's pants and lifting R30 out of the recliner. V18 then wheeled R30 into the bathroom. V18 transferred R30 from the wheelchair to the toilet by holding onto the waistband of R30's pants. No gait belt was used by V18 CNA for either of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 12 residents (R73 and R76) reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R73's admission Record dated April 29, 2025, shows R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies, alzheimer's disease with early onset, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, and a history of falling. R73's Care Plan revised on November 1, 2024, shows, R73 exhibits resistance to cares: (refusing/resisting medication, refusing/resisting activities of daily living assistance, refusing/resisting food and/or fluids; refusing requests to get out of bed, refusing to cooperate with care plan objectives) related to psychiatric illness, severe mental illness, dementia, fear/paranoia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address an irregularity found by the pharmacist during the monthly medication review for 1 of 5 residents (R73) reviewed for drug regimen review in the sample of 19. The findings include: R73's admission Record dated April 29, 2025, shows R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies, alzheimer's disease with early onset, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, and a history of falling. R73's Medication Regimen Review Prescriber Recommendation (MRR) dated March 11, 2025, shows, Resident is receiving quetiapine and furosemide but has not had any recent labs evaluated. Please consider: CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel) now and every six months thereafter. The recommendation was signed off by the physician and says the order was faxed to lab on March 21, 2025, by a licensed practical nurse. R73's Medication Regimen Review Prescribe Recommendation dated April 15, 2025, shows,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication labeling was legible for 1 of 19 residents (R32) reviewed for medication storage and labeling in the sample of 19. The findings include: R32's Order Summary Report dated April 30, 2025, shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart disease, unsteadiness on feet, convulsions, dementia, alzheimer's disease, and anxiety disorder. On April 30, 2025, at 9:53 AM, there was a blue bottle that contained white round pills in the locked memory care unit medication cart. R32's name was legible on the pill bottle label. The medication name was illegible and so was the full dispensed date. V20 Licensed Practical Nurse said she did not know what medication it was, but believed it was a hospice medication. On April 30, 2025, at 10:45 AM, V8 Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said medications should be legible and if they are not, then it should be replaced. The facility's Labeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 19 residents (R63) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 19. The findings include: R63's face sheet printed on 4/28/25 indicated R63 had a feeding tube. On 04/28/25 at 09:35 AM, there was a sign on R63's door indicating R63 was on enhanced barrier precautions. The sign indicated staff must wear gloves and gowns for high-contact resident care activities such as changing an incontinence brief or assisting with toileting. On 04/28/25 at 09:35 AM, R63 was in bed connected to his tube feeding. V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA) and V11 (CNA) entered the room to provide incontinence care and changed R63's incontinence brief as it was soiled with urine. V10 and V11 had gloves on but no gown. V10 and V11 both touched the tubing of R63's tube feeding while providing incontinence care. On 04/28/25 at 10:01 AM, V10 said for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required personal protective equipment for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet printed on 10/15/24 showed R2 had a diagnosis of skin cancer to his left ear. On 10/15/24 at 10:58 AM, V6 (Wound Care Nurse) provided wound care to R2's left ear. R2's left ear had a redden opened area smaller than a pea. R2 stated the wound on his left ear was from skin cancer. While providing wound care, V6 had on gloves but no gown. V6 cleansed the wound, applied the ordered cream, and covered the wound with a dressing. 2. R3's Order Summary Report printed on 10/15/24 showed R3 had an order for a cream to be applied to her right great toe and covered with a band aid. On 10/15/24 at 11:14 AM, V6 provided wound care to R3's right great toe. The bottom of R3's right great toe had a wound that was dark and smaller than 0.5 centimeters. While providing wound care, V6 had on gloves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This applies to 2 of 13 residents (R12 & R14) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 13. The findings include: 1. On September 16, 2024, at 1:44 PM, R12 stated, V12 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was short with residents. She has gotten to a point where she doesn't want to ask V12 CNA for anything, she does it herself if she can or will wait for someone else. On September 16, 2024, at 2:47 PM, R14 stated, V12 CNA walked into her room one day without knocking. R14 asked V12 CNA, do you let people walk into your room without knocking? V12 CNA responded, I'm not going to talk about that and walked out of R14's room. V12 CNA then refused to help her. On September 16, 2024, at 9:10 AM, V16 CNA stated, V12 CNA is very rude and always yelling at people. On September 16, 2024, at 9:42 AM, V3 CNA stated, V12 CNA has an attitude problem. On September 16, 2024, at 1:14 PM, V2 Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, V12 CNA has had lots of complaints about her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 6. The findings include: R1's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include restless legs syndrome, Alzheimer's Disease, idiopathic neuropathy, diastolic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, primary osteoarthritis, lymphocytic colitis, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis, major depressive disorder, and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has moderate cognitive impairment and requires partial to moderate assistance with dressing and personal hygiene and supervision or touching assistance with transfers. R1's Social Services note dated 5/1/24 showed, Writer met with resident to inquire of any interaction that occurred previous day between resident and staff. Resident was quick to recall and to share with writer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4. R194's Physician's Order Sheet printed on 5/7/24 shows an order for Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg)-Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. The order had a start date of 4/19/24 and there was no end date documented. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications had a duration for 5 of 5 residents (R40, R26, R50, R28, R194) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R40's Physician Orders dated 3/10/24 shows an order for Haloperidol Lactate Concentrate 2 MG/ML Give 0.25 ml my mouth every 2 hours as needed for mild restlessness related to unspecified dementia, moderate, with agitation and an order for Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for anxiety related to unspecified dementia, moderate, with agitation. The orders do not contain a stop date or duration. 2. R26's Physician Orders dated 1/27/24 shows an order for Lorazepam Concentrate 2 MG/ML Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for anxiety. The orders do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and implement interventions for a known contracture for 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 05/06/24 at 09:43 AM, R13 was sitting in the recliner in her room. R13's left hand fingers were curled into the palm of her hand. R13 stated I have a brace, but it hurts me, so I don't wear it. They tried putting a rag, it doesn't hurt but it falls out. I have used a carrot thing, but not lately. R13's most recent Care Plan contains no documentation of R13's contracture or range of motion/restorative needs. R13's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows R13 had functional limitation in range of motion of impairment to one side to upper extremity and lower extremity. On 05/07/24 at 09:30 AM, V6 Registered Nurse stated R13 has a contracture to her left hand. On 05/07/24 at 12:09 PM, V2 Director of Nursing stated she was not familiar with R13's hand contracture and she was not sure who is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred with a sit to stand lift for 1 of 18 residents (R14) reviewed for safety in the sample of 18. The findings include: R14's Fall Incident Report dated 3/14/24 shows, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported resident was not standing on the stand lift during transfer to the toilet and started letting go of the grab bars. Lowered to the floor by stand lift. On 5/8/24 at 8:47 AM, V16 (CNA) said that she could not remember if she was transferring R14 on or off of the toilet but R14 was positioned by the toilet when she was being transferred with the sit to stand lift. V16 said that she was not standing up very well and kept letting go of the bars of the lift. V16 said that she was the only one in the room transferring her and she knew that she really needed to pull the call light to get help but could not reach it so she slowly lowered R14 to the floor. V16 said that she thinks R14 was changed to a mechanical sling lift after the incident for her safety. R14's Nurses Note date 3/16/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's head remained elevated above 30 degrees while a tube feeding was infusing for 1 of 1 residents (R393) reviewed for tube feedings in the sample of 18. The findings include: R393's face sheet showed R393 had dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy (tube feeding), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. On 05/07/24 at 10:01 AM, V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA) and V4 (CNA) entered R393's room to provide incontinence care. R393 was connected to his tube feeding and the tube feeding pump was infusing at 50 milliliters per hour. V4 lowered R393's head of bed below 30 degrees. R393's head of bed was nearly flat. R393's tube feeding continued to infuse. V3 and V4 provided incontinence care as R393 was incontinent of stool. After providing incontinence care, V3 lowered R393's head of bed all the way down and repositioned R393 high up in bed. R393's tube feeding was not paused while his head of bed was lowered below 30 degrees when receiving incontinence care and being repositioned. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore isolation gowns when providing high contact care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 18 residents (R393) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 18. The findings include: R393's face sheet showed R393 had a gastrostomy (tube feeding). On 05/07/24 at 10:01 AM, on the door to R393's room was a sign indicating R393 was on enhanced barrier precautions. The sign indicated staff were to wear gloves and gowns during high contact resident care activities. V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA) and V4 (CNA) entered R393's room to provide incontinence care. R393 was incontinent of stool and had his adult incontinence brief changed by V3 and V4. During the incontinence care, V4 assisted R393 to turn and held the tubing of the tube feeding. V3 and V4 did not wear isolation gowns when providing incontinence care. On 05/07/24 at 11:31 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said residents that have a catheter or implanted medical devices, such as a tube feeding, are placed on enhanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report a resident injury to the state agency for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for injuries in the sample of 6. The findings include: R1's admission Record, printed by the facility on 11/8/23, showed she had diagnoses including enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C-diff), generalized osteoarthritis, hypertension, a history of falling, iron deficiency anemia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, seizures, unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, and weakness. R1's care plan, with a revision date of 11/8/23, showed R1 requires sit to stand by staff to transfer. R1's Order Summary Report, printed by the facility on 11/8/23, showed an order for Vancomycin HCL (hydrochloride) 125 mg by mouth two times a day for suspected C-diff for 14 days. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE], showed she was cognitively intact and required extensive assist of staff for toileting. On 11/8/23 at 9:18 AM, R1 was in her room, sitting in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify, implement, and document control measures to prevent the growth of opportunistic waterborne pathogens (such as Legionella); failed to establish acceptable ranges for control measures; and failed to identify corrective actions for when control limits are not met. This applies to all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility's CMS 672 Form dated 8/1/23 showed there were 71 residents residing in the facility. On 8/2/23 at 12:32 PM, V18 (IP - Infection Preventionist) said the facility had not had any Legionella outbreaks. V17 said maintenance does the water testing. There is not an outside company that comes in to do any water testing. The Facility's Water Management Program dated 2017 provided basic information about the facility's water sources, elements of a water management program, water flow diagrams, and identification of potential growth locations. This program did not include a list of residents more susceptible to Legionella infection, evidence of collaboration with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication administration was observed for 1 of 1 resident (R20) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 18 and 3 residents (R66, R48, R6) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1. On 8/1/23 at 11:55 AM, residents were sitting in the dining rooms waiting for the noon meal. V5 (float RN - Registered Nurse) gave R66 a medication cup with his noon medications and walked away. R66 asked questions about the medications in the cup. V5 checked R66's pills and walked away again. R66 poured the medication into his hand and took them, unsupervised. V5 had already returned to the medication cart and was looking down to prepare medications for R48. At 12:10 PM, V5 (float RN) said she is a float nurse for the corporation and is not familiar with the residents. V5 stated, This is my first day working with these residents. V5 was looking at resident's pictures, asking the residents their names, and asking the dietary staff the residents' names. R66's Face Sheet dated 8/3/23 showed he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an at-risk resident with a history of falls was safe by not providing supervision to prevent falls for 1 of 8 residents (R40) reviewed for falls in the sample of 18. The findings include: R40's face sheet showed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosis include dementia, repeated falls, urinary incontinence, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. On 8/1/23 at 12:50 PM, R40 was alone in his room in the recliner. There was a scabbed area noted to the top of his head. On 8/2/23 at 9:45 AM, R40 was alone in his room in a recliner. On 8/2/23 at 1:29 PM, V17, R40's spouse said she was concerned R40 had five falls here since admission. That's litigation level. V17 said she told the facility on admission R40 slept in a recliner at home and not a bed. V17 said R40 had numerous falls at home (prior to admission) and didn't think he (R40) was well supervised at the facility. On 08/03/23 at 10:22 AM, V2 Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$188,633 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $66,330 — penalty dated 2026-03-04
- $30,030 — penalty dated 2024-09-16
- $72,149 — penalty dated 2024-05-13
- $20,124 — penalty dated 2023-11-09
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-02 for 68 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MN1 MANAGEMENT CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 23% | since 12/01/2022 |
| GOLDBERG, JEREMY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 23% | since 12/01/2022 |
| OSEROFF, MEYER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 23% | since 12/01/2022 |
| WENGROW, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 12/01/2022 |
| NUDELL, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 23% | since 12/01/2022 |
| LABASH, FEROL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/01/2022 |
| MEYER, SAMANTHA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $678K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145024. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.