Allure Of Stockton
501 Front Street, Stockton, IL 61085 · For profit - Corporation · 49 certified beds · (815) 947-2215 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 88.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.0% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.4–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 29.2 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an opened vial of Tuberculin was labeled with an open date. This has the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility's CMS form 671 dated [DATE] showed there were 22 residents residing in the facility. On [DATE] at 10:40 AM, V6 (RN - Registered Nurse) used a key to open the black, medication refrigerator, in the facility's only medication room. On the top shelf of the refrigerator was a sealed, clear plastic bag with 3 unopened vials of Tuberculin inside. To the left of this bag was an opened vial of Tuberculin, with approximately 1/3 of the fluid remaining in the vial. This vial was not labeled with an open date. The surveyor asked V6 what this vial was used for. V6 stated, We use that to do the TB tests on all new admissions and then once a year for our long-term residents. That vial should have an open date on it. It's not labeled, so I will need to throw it away. V6 said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to clean ceiling fans above the food service area and failed to clean and defrost a freezer. This applies to all residents in the facility. The findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) 671 dated 6/4/24 shows there are 22 residents in the facility. On 6/4/24 at 9:21 AM, the freezer in the dry storage room was observed with large amounts of frost present throughout the entire freezer. The food within the freezer was covered with frost crystals. On 6/4/24 at 11:45 AM, the kitchen staff were observed preparing the lunch trays for the residents. Above the food service area were two working ceiling fans covered with a black substance. The cleaning schedule and procedures check list shows the freezers should be defrosted if ice build up is present. The list also shows to clean ceilings and light fixtures during non-food production hours, clean free from dust and debris. On 6/06/24 at 9:10 AM, (V3) (food service supervisor) said it's important to keep the work areas clean to prevent contamination of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-06 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit required payroll based journal (PBJ) data. This effects all residents in the facility. The findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) 671 dated 6/4/24 shows there are 22 residents in the facility. The [NAME] Report 1705D for the fiscal year quarter 1 2024 shows the facility triggered for failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours a day and one star staffing rating. The facility was able to produce time card records showing a nurse was on duty for all infraction dates of 10/1/23, 10/4/23, 10/5/23, 10/9/23, 10/10/23, 10/13/23, 10/14/23, 10/15/23, 10/19/23, 10/28/23, 10/29/23, 11/11/23, 11/15/23, 11/23/23, 11/24/23, 11/25/23, 12/9/23 and 12/23/23. On 6/05/24 at 11:38 AM, (V4) (Office Assistant) said she receives the spreadsheet from (V5) (Vice President of Operations) and she fills in all the staff hours of the social services, activities, dietary, management staff, and any outside agency staff and returns the spread sheet to V5. V4 said she does not understand why the information did not show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided catheter care in a dignified manner for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 13. The findings include: On 6/05/24 at 1:28 PM, V7 (CNA- Certified Nursing Aide) and V8 (Restorative Aide) entered R1's room to provide catheter care. R1's roommate was seated in her wheelchair, watching TV. V7 explained that she was going to provide catheter care to R1 and pulled the privacy curtain between R1's side of the room and the roommate's side. R1's room had 3 windows on the opposite side of her bed. Each window had it's own blind. The center window had the blinds closed, but the left and right window blinds were open. There was a clear view to the sidewalk, street, and diagonal street parking from R1's window. V7 and V8 removed R1's linens and exposed her perineum and lower body. V7 provided catheter care to R1. During this care, a white sedan pulled into the diagonal parking, facing R1's room. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to complete assessments including wound measurements for a resident with a reoccurring wound. This applies to one of two residents (R6) reviewed for non-pressure wounds in the sample of 13. The findings include: The facility face sheet for R6 shows diagnoses to include heart disease, hemiplegia, obesity, chronic kidney disease and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. The facility assessment dated [DATE] for R6 shows him to be cognitively intact and is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. The weekly skin assessments for R6 dated 5/14/24, 5/21/24 and 5/28/24 shows scar tissue open to left buttock. No measurements or other assessment of the wound observed in the record. On 6/5/24 at 9:56 AM, R6 was observed lying in bed receiving incontinence care by the staff. A small opening was observed on R6's left lower buttock near his leg. The area that was open was surrounded by a darker red color skin. No drainage was observed at the open area.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident had an anchoring device for an indwelling catheter for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 13. The findings include: On 6/5/24 at 1:28 PM, V7 (CNA - Certified Nursing Aide) and V8 (Restorative Aide) entered R1's room to provide catheter care. V7 and V8 pulled R1's blankets down and moved her gown to expose R1's perineum and lower legs. R1 had a silicone, indwelling catheter in place. The catheter was not anchored to her leg. The catheter tubing ran along R1's right leg, curled on the bed, then extended to the catheter bag that was hooked on the bed-frame. R1's right and left thigh did not have any tape or evidence of a securing device being in place. R1's bedding did not contain a catheter anchoring device. V7 (CNA) provided catheter care, then R1 decided she wanted to get dressed for the day and participate in an activity. V7 and V8 rolled R1 side to side while applying an incontinence brief,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label food items, failed to ensure a functional thermometer was utilized in two freezers, and failed to maintain a freezer to prevent ice buildup. These failures have the potential to affect all residents in the building. The findings include: The Resident Census and Condition Report, dated 5/2/23, showed 29 residents residing in the building. On 5/2/23 at 8:59AM, The facility's standing freezer located in the dry storage room had an unlabeled fast food cup full of a pink frozen substance and 2 packages of unlabeled food. The thermometer in the freezer was unable to measure an accurate temperature, due to the scale line being broken and tilted, giving an inaccurate temperature reading. The freezer shelves were all lined with thick blocks of ice and packed full of bags of frozen food items. There was no additional room in the freezer and bags were falling off shelves during observation. On 5/2/23 at 9:09AM, containers of brown sugar, butter, and peanut butter were placed in a cabinet underneath the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications at ordered times. There were 27 opportunities with 9 errors, resulting in a 33.33% medication error rate. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R7,R15,R28,R126) observed in the medication pass. The findings include: 1) R7's electronic face sheet printed on 5/3/23 showed R7 has diagnoses including but not limited to heart disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, and venous insufficiency. R7's medication administration record (MAR) for May 2023 showed R7 receives Carvedilol 25mg and Sacubitril-Valsartan 97-103mg at 8AM and 5PM. On 5/2/23 at 9:35AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) administered R7's Carvedilol 25mg and Sacubitril-Valsartain 97-104mg. (1 hour and 35 minutes past the scheduled administration time) On 5/2/23 at 9:40AM, V4 stated, My whole screen is red and I'm late on all of my remaining medications. I was busy this morning doing skin checks and wound treatments so that is why I am late giving medications. I probably should have prioritized my time better but there's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care treatment as prescribed by the physician and in manner to promote resident comfort. This failure applies to 1 of 1 (R126) residents in the sample of 13. The findings include: R126's Transfer/Discharge Report (Face Sheet) showed an admission date of 4/25/23, with diagnoses to include: venous insufficiency, obesity, right artificial hip joint. On 5/2/23 at 2:20 PM, R126 had a dressing to her right hip, left calf, and right calf. R126 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and her condition. V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), entered R126's room to provide wound care. V4 provided wound care to R126's right hip and completed the care at 2:30 PM. V4 then proceeded to R126's right leg wound. Prior to removing the right leg dressing, R126 asked if V4 was going to soak the dressing prior to removal; V4 did not respond. After V4 removed R126's right leg dressing she applied an antimicrobial/petroleum based gauze dressing. V4 covered this dressing with an absorbent pad and gauze wrap. V4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed administer the correct dose of an antipsychotic medication and failed to notice an antipsychotic medication on the floor of the facility. This applies to 1 resident (R15) outside the sample. The findings include: On 5/2/23 at 2:00 PM, a white and brown, oblong capsule was seen on the floor next to the medication cart parked by the dining area. The medication cart showed the only resident in the facility taking that medication was R15. The blister card listed that medication as Thiothixene 5 mg (milligrams) with 2 capsules in each blister. R15's Face Sheet showed her diagnoses includes, schizoaffective bipolar type, anxiety and dementia with agitation. R15's 5/2023 POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows, she (R15) is ordered Thiothixene 5 mg, 2 capsules, by mouth, every morning for schizoaffective disorder. On 5/4/23 at 10:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) said, (R15) is the only resident to get Thiothixene, and if a pill was found on the floor, it means she didn't get her full dose. V1 said it's important to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 9 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to prevent cross-contamination. This failure applies to 1 of 2 residents (R11) in the sample of 13. The findings include: R11's Transfer/discharge Report (Face Sheet) showed and original admission date of 7/28/2020, with diagnoses to include: Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and overactive bladder. R11's 4/6/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed she had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 12 out of 15. The MDS showed R11 required extensive assistance of two staff for toilet use to include cleaning herself after elimination. The MDS showed she was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R11's Medication Review Report (Physician Orders Sheet) showed an active order for an antibiotic to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs). On 5/02/23 at 1:13 PM, R11 stated, I have had many UTIs (urinary tract infections). I'm not sure the last time I had one. On 5/02/23 at 10:28 AM, V6 and V7 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) provided incontinence care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's lunch menu on 4/19/22, and did not follow the recipe for pureed ham, provide pureed bread for residents, or measure the portion sizes for the ham. This applies to all 33 facility residents. The findings include: The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) form 672 Resident Census and Condition of Residents, dated April 19, 2022, showed 33 residents reside in the facility. On 4/19/22 at 11:13 AM, V5 (Cook) took the ham out of the oven, cut off some pieces of ham and placed them into a food processor. V5 did not weigh the ham to see if the portion size was correct. V5 took a glass, put cold 2% milk in it and added it to the ham in the food processor to puree the ham. V5 turned on the food processor. V5 looked at the consistency of the ham, and it was still chunky. V5 grabbed more 2% milk and added it to the ham. V5 continued to use the food processor to puree the ham. V5 dumped the ham that was supposed to be pureed into a pan. The ham did not look completely pureed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the ham was pureed to the correct consistency for the lunch meal on 4/19/22 for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 33 and 2 residents (R14 & R25) outside of the sample. The findings include: On 4/19/22 at 11:13 AM, V5 (Cook) took the ham out of the oven, cut off some pieces of ham and placed them into a food processor. V5 did not weigh the ham to see if the portion size was correct. V5 took a glass, put cold 2% milk in it and added it to the ham in the food processor to puree the ham. V5 turned on the food processor. V5 looked at the consistency of the ham and it was still chunky. V5 grabbed more 2% milk and added it to the ham. V5 continued to use the food processor to puree the ham. V5 dumped the ham that was supposed to be pureed into a pan. The ham did not look completely pureed and milk was visible. On 4/19/22 at 12:20 PM, a test tray of pureed food was obtained. The pureed ham was sitting in milk and was not the correct texture. The ham was stringy and had to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was cleaned on a regular basis. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen did not have grease on walls, cobwebs and thick dust to surfaces. The facility failed to ensure staff wear hair nets in the kitchen. This applies to all 33 facility residents. The findings include: The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) form 672 Resident Census and Condition of Residents, dated April 19, 2022, showed 33 residents reside in the facility. On 4/19/22 at 8:53 AM, the handwashing sink in the kitchen had a brown build up around the drain and the white sink had brown dried buildup all over it. The faucet on the handwashing sink had a white crusty substance on it. Thick dust and cobwebs were on the ceiling, walls, ceiling fans, and exposed pipes including pipes above the food preparation areas. There was crusty debris on stainless steel 3 compartment sink rubber mat where pans and other kitchen items dry. V5 (Cook) was standing at the 3-compartment sink washing, rinsing and sanitizing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide influenza vaccinations between October 1, 2021 and March 31, 2022. This applies to all 33 facility residents. The findings include: On 4/20/22 at 11:30 AM, five residents (R3, R6, R15, R28 & R32) were reviewed for the receipt or declination of the influenza vaccination. There was no documentation to show the residents were offered the influenza vaccination, consented, or declined receiving it. There was no documentation showing the residents received the administration of the influenza vaccine between October 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022. On 4/20/22 at 12:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, We are looking for immunization information but I don't know where the previous DON (Director of Nursing) put it. On 4/20/22 at 12:20 PM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated, Some consents and/or refusals for vaccinations are scanned into the computer and some are not. We are looking for them. On 4/20/22 at 2:30 PM, V6 (Corporate Regional Nurse) stated, I know the DON was instructed to give residents the Influenza…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply a hand and wrist splint to prevent contractures for 1 of 2 residents (R19) reviewed for positioning and mobility in the sample of 13. The findings include: R19's electronic face sheet, printed on 4/21/22, showed R19 has diagnoses including but not limited to: COVID-19, type 2 diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, aphasia, dysphagia, fibromyalgia, dementia without behaviors, cerebral infarction, and anxiety disorder. R19's care plan, dated 5/19/20, showed, Contracture of right hand secondary to cerebrovascular accident. Palm protector to (R19's) right hand. Please wash and dry (R19's) right hand 2-3 times daily. If or when palm protector becomes soiled, please contact therapy and she will clean the protector and provide a clean one for (R19) to wear. Remove for skin care twice per day. R19's facility assessment, dated 2/3/22, showed R19 has severe cognitive impairment. R19's physician's orders for April 2022 showed, palm protector to (R19's) right hand. Please cleanse, wash, and dry (R19's) right hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place for 2 of 3 residents (R27,R6) reviewed for falls in the sample of 13. The findings include: 1. R27's electronic face sheet, printed on 4/21/22, showed R27 has diagnosis including but not limited to: COVID-19, Parkinson's disease, repeated falls, sciatica, Alzheimer's disease, and major depressive disorder. R27's facility assessment, dated 2/20/22, showed R27 has no cognitive impairment and requires 1 person assistance for transfers. R27's care plan, dated 7/26/21, showed, (R27) has an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to disease processes: Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's dementia, gait instability, and history of falls. (R27) requires 1 assistance by staff to move between surfaces. Refuses assistance. R27's care plan, dated 4/19/22, showed, (R27) is a high risk for falls related to confusion, gait/balance problems, and history of falls. Resident appears to be intentionally falling at times related to behaviors. Resident states…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide incontinence care in a manner to prevent a urinary tract infection for 1 resident (R7) with a history of urinary tract infections. These failures apply to 1 of 1 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence in the sample of 13. The findings include: R7's electronic face sheet, printed on 4/21/22, showed R7 has diagnosis including, but not limited to: unspecified diastolic congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral infarction, and peripheral vascular disease. R7's care plan, dated 6/30/21, showed, (R7) has mixed bladder incontinence: stress incontinence due to leakage and obesity, urge incontinence related to diabetes mellitus, and functional incontinence related to needing assistance with mobility and clothing management, osteoarthritis, and pain. (R7) has exhibited some stubborn behavior with bladder incontinence. When staff has offered to toilet her she stated, I'm 83 y/o and who gives a sh*t. Offer and encourage toileting upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to track and document behaviors for a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 4 residents (R22) reviewed for antipsychotic medications in the sample of 13. The findings include: R22's electronic face sheet, printed on 4/21/22, showed R22 has diagnoses including, but not limited to: anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, major depressive disorder, and dementia without behaviors. R22's care plan, dated 12/8/21, showed, The resident uses psychotropic medications related to behavior management. Discuss with physician and family regarding ongoing need for use of medication. Consult with pharmacy, physician to consider dosage reduction when clinically appropriate at least quarterly. R22's facility assessment, dated 2/22/22, showed R22 has severe cognitive impairment. R22's Psychotropic evaluation, dated 3/28/22, showed, -on occasion can be combative & agitated with care. R22's physician's orders for April 2022, showed, Risperdal 0.25mg with meals for delusional disorder and Risperdal 0.5mg at bedtime for delusional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MN1 MANAGEMENT CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 33% | since 09/01/2021 |
| GOLDBERG, JEREMY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 33% | since 03/09/2015 |
| OSEROFF, MEYER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 33% | since 09/01/2021 |
| NUDELL, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 33% | since 09/01/2021 |
| ALLURE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $219K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146147. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.