No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Colonial Nursing Home

119 N Indiana Ave, Crown Point, IN 46307 · For profit - Individual · 55 certified beds · (219) 663-2532 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (219) 663-2532 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 35 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Rejenesis0.5 mi
123 N Main St Ste 204A · (844) 735-3637 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
891 E Summit St · (219) 663-1775 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
794 N Main St · (219) 310-8685 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1275 E North St · (219) 663-2793 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.6%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.4%1.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.9%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.9%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.5%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.0%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.6%23.3%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.7%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.8%79.0%79.4%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.4–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.13
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.83
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.78
RN hoursweekends
59.0%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 29.1 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-02)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen related to testing the dishwasher sanitation level with faulty test strips in 1 of 1 kitchens observed (Main Kitchen). This had the potential to affect the 26 of 29 residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen. Finding includes: During the initial kitchen tour on 5/27/25 at 9:10 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), the dishwasher was observed and noted to be a low temperature, chemical system. The DFM obtained a testing strip, dipped it into the dishwasher water and compared it to the results on the side of the testing strip container. The strip did not have a readily discernable color change. He indicated they always used those strips and was unsure why they were not changing. He opened a new package of test strips and attempted to get another reading, however the strips still did not have a discernable color change. He indicated he would call the service company to address the dishwasher and go get another new package of strips. During a follow up interview on 6/2/25 at 11:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-02 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (SQ FT) per resident in multiple resident rooms and 100 SQ FT in single occupancy rooms. This was evidenced in 8 of 30 resident rooms in the facility. (Rooms 101, 104, 111, 201, 202, 204, 206, and 208) Findings include: 1. The floor area of the following single resident room measured: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 96.2 SQ FT. NF. 2. The floor areas of the following multiple resident rooms measured: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 0 residents, 150.3 SQ FT, 75.2 SQ FT per bed. NF. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 145.0 SQ FT, 72.5 SQ FT per bed. NF. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 149.0 SQ FT, 74.5 SQ FT per bed. NF. d. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 144.0 SQ FT, 72.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. e. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 144.0 SQ FT, 72.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. f. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 0 residents, 140.0 SQ FT, 70.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. g. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 0 residents, 146.9 SQ FT, 73.4 SQ FT per bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician was notified of medication being held for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 183) Finding includes: Resident 183's record was reviewed on 5/29/25 at 11:10 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cellulitis of the right lower limb, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and pressure ulcer to the right heel. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/10/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. She received diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet, and hypoglycemic medications in the 7-day look-back period. The current May 2025 Physician's Order Summary indicated the resident received Novolog FlexPen (insulin injection) subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/milliliter, inject 12 units subcutaneously three times a day with meals. The May 2025 Medication Administration Record indicated the Novolog medication was coded 11= blood sugar level below parameters on the following dates and times: - At 8:00 a.m.: 5/1/25 blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was implemented for a resident with a diabetic foot ulcer for 1 of 12 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident 13) Finding includes: During an observation of wound care on 5/29/25 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 13's left foot diabetic foot ulcer treatment was observed with RN 1. The area was located on the lateral foot and was open, light red in color, and had minimal drainage. RN 1 performed the wound care per the physician's order and then adjusted the resident in bed for comfort with a round cushion noted to the right leg. Resident 13's record was reviewed on 5/28/25 at 3:08 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis) affecting the right dominant side, cognitive communication deficit, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/4/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident had impairments in range of motion to one side of the upper extremities and both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a reddened sclera (white part of eyeball) of the eye was assessed and monitored for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for vision/hearing services. (Resident 20). Finding includes: On 5/28/25 at 11:02 a.m., Resident 20 was sitting in a recliner in her room. She indicated her right eye had been red for some time, but could not say exactly when it began. The nursing staff had pointed it out to her the other day as she was not even aware of the redness noted to her eye. The right eyeball was observed to be solid red in color on the bottom portion of the sclera. On 5/30/25 at 1:20 p.m., Resident 20 was observed in the common area. Her right eye was still red in color. Resident 20's record was reviewed on 5/30/25 at 2:45 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/8/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The record lacked documentation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services related to not obtaining treatment orders for a wound vac for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 183) Finding includes: During an observation of wound care on 5/29/25 at 9:53 a.m. with RN 1, a dressing change was observed to Resident 183's proximal and distal left thigh. RN 1 indicated at the time that Resident 183 had a wound vac placed to her right heel the day before (5/28/25) and there was no treatment change due at the time. Resident 183's record was reviewed on 5/29/25 at 11:10 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cellulitis of the right lower limb, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and pressure ulcer to the right heel. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/10/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had two unstageable pressure ulcers. A Skin and Wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there were orders and/or monitoring completed for a resident on a fluid restriction. (Resident 183) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 5/28/25 at 9:47 a.m., Resident 183 indicated she had returned to the facility the day before and had an infection, so she was now on antibiotic therapy. She had to have surgery on her leg. The resident indicated she has had to have fluid removed at the hospital before and was on a fluid restriction at the hospital; however, since being back in the facility, she was not required to be on a fluid restriction any longer. There was a large foam cup on her bedside table full of water. Resident 183's record was reviewed on 5/29/25 at 11:10 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and pressure ulcer to the right heel. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/10/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. She received diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and treatment related to oxygen administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 9) Finding includes: On 5/27/25 at 11:09 a.m., Resident 9 was observed in her room lying in bed. A nasal cannula was in place and oxygen was flowing. The oxygen concentrator was set at 2 liters. On 5/28/25 at 3:05 p.m., Resident 9 was observed in her room lying in bed. A nasal cannula was in place and oxygen was flowing. The oxygen concentrator was set at 2 liters. Resident 9's record was reviewed on 5/29/25 at 10:38 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and hypertension. A Physician's Order, dated 4/3/25, indicated oxygen 2 L (liters) via nasal cannula as needed (PRN) for shortness of breath, maintain oxygen saturation above 90. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to the disposal of used lancets into the garbage can for 1 of 1 glucometer (machine used to test blood sugar levels) testing observed. (Resident 183, RN 1) Finding includes: On 5/30/25 at 11:02 a.m., RN 1 indicated he was going to check Resident 183's blood sugar. The nurse washed his hands, applied gloves, and wiped the resident's left first finger with an alcohol wipe. He then poked the resident's finger with the lancet. Blood was observed on the resident's finger and he then proceeded to check the blood sugar with the glucometer. He discarded the lancet into the garbage can next to the resident's bed. He then proceeded back to the medication cart. During an interview at that time with RN 1, he indicated he should not have discarded the lancet into the garbage can, but instead into the sharps container. He was unsure what the blood sugar reading was and he would have to re-check the resident's blood sugar. The nurse then proceeded to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, safe, and homelike environment related to dirty kitchen walls and floors in the kitchen. (Main Kitchen) Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 5/27/25 at 9:10 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM), the following was observed: a. The wall next to stove top was covered in splashed food and debris. b. The floor and baseboard underneath the dishwasher was dirty and covered in a build up of debris. During an interview at the time, the DFM indicated the above areas were in need of a deep clean. He was not supposed to be the main cook today, so he had not had time to get to those areas yet. 3.1-19(f)

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used by staff members (Agency CNA 1 and Agency CNA 5) when providing care to residents (Resident D and F) who were in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for EBP. The facility also failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed by a staff member (Agency CNA 1) after care had been completed on a resident (Resident B) and care initiated on another resident (Resident C) and to ensure a personal care item was used for only 1 resident and was not used for multiple residents (Residents B, C, G, D, and H) by a staff member related to incontinent wipes. (Agency CNA 1) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 5:30 a.m., Agency CNA 1 entered Resident D's room to provide care. There was a sign on the outside of the entry door that indicated the resident required EBP during care. Agency CNA 1 applied gloves and was stopped prior to starting care. She indicated she had no idea if the resident required PPE due to EBP. The CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was clean and in good repair related to scraped paint, nicks and gouges on the walls, dried feeding on the feeding poles, a oxygen concentrator and on the floor, debris and trash on the floors, a dirty floor mat, and a stool with a cracked vinyl seat for 1 of 2 floors. (First Floor). During an environmental tour with the Director of Maintenance/Housekeeping on 3/18/25 from 12:59 through 1:29 p.m., the following was observed: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - There were paint scrapes behind the head of the bed. During an interview at the time of the observation, the Director of Maintenance/Housekeeping acknowledged the scrapes and indicated when the residents were discharged or moved rooms, the walls were repaired. b. room [ROOM NUMBER], bed 2 - There was dried feeding on the feeding pump pole, the oxygen concentrator and on the floor. The Director of Maintenance/Housekeeping indicated the Housekeeper probably had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean and homelike environment related to soiled bed linens for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for a clean and homelike environment. (Residents B and D) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 4:58 a.m., Agency CNA 2 entered Resident B's room to completed incontinence care. A soiled incontinent brief was removed, pericare was completed and a clean brief was applied. When the resident was turned to the side, there was a dried urine ring under the resident's incontinent pad. Agency CNA 2 indicated she had not checked the bottom sheet under the incontinent pad when she provided care earlier in the night. Resident B's record was reviewed on 3/18/25 at 10:03 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/16/25, indicated a moderately impaired cognitive status, was dependent for toileting, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. 2. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 5:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff received incontinence care for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Residents E and F) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 5:26 a.m., RN 1 and Agency CNA 2 entered Resident E's room on the C-Hall, to assist with positioning the resident in bed. The incontinence brief was saturated with urine. The incontinence pad under the resident was soaked with urine and there were circles of dried urine on the sheet under the incontinence pad. The staff repositioned the resident in bed and Agency CNA 2 informed the resident she would be back in a few minutes. She indicated she had last provided incontinence care at 3:00 a.m. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 6:08 a.m., incontinence care had not yet been completed. During an observation on 3/18/25 at 7:19 a.m., CNA 3 and LPN 4 entered the room and and completed incontinence care and a linen change. There was a strong urine odor in the room. LPN 4 acknowledged the saturated brief, wet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a least 80 square feet (SQ FT) per resident in multiple resident rooms and 100 SQ FT in single occupancy rooms. This was evidenced in 8 of 30 resident rooms in the facility. (Rooms 101, 104, 111, 201, 202, 204, 206, and 208) Findings include: 1. The floor area of the following single resident room measured: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 96.2 SQ FT. NF. 2. The floor areas of the following multiple resident rooms measured: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 150.3 SQ FT, 75.2 SQ FT per bed. NF. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 0 resident, 145.0 SQ FT, 72.5 SQ FT per bed. NF. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 149.0 SQ FT, 74.5 SQ FT per bed. NF. d. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 144.0 SQ FT, 72.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. e. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 144.0 SQ FT, 72.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. f. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 140.0 SQ FT, 70.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. g. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 146.9 SQ FT, 73.4 SQ FT per bed. NF.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were implemented for a cognitively impaired dependent resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities. (Resident 14) Finding includes: On 8/19/24 at 11:16 a.m., Resident 14 was observed lying in bed with her eyes open and looking up at the ceiling. The room was dark, the television was off, and there was no music playing. On 8/20/24 at 1:07 p.m., Resident 14 was was observed lying in bed with her eyes open and looking up at the ceiling. The room was dark, the television was off, and there was no music playing. On 8/20/24 at 2:25 p.m., Resident 14 was was observed lying in bed with her eyes open and looking up at the ceiling. The room was dark and the television was not on. A bingo activity was being played in the dining area and in some resident rooms. Record review for Resident 14 was completed on 8/20/24 at 1:27 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech) and depression. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wounds were assessed and monitored for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Resident 10) Finding includes: On 8/19/24 at 3:10 p.m. and on 8/20/24 at 2:15 p.m., Resident 10 was observed lying in bed. She had two open areas, approximately 3 centimeters round each, on her right shin. She indicated they had been fluid filled blisters that had opened. The resident's record was reviewed on 8/20/24 at 11:33 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiparesis (one sided weakness) and hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) following a cerebral vascular accident, Diabetes Mellitus and heart failure. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/30/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on assistance for bed mobility and transfers. A Nursing Note, dated 8/14/24, indicated the resident had been up in a chair for five hours and fluid filled blisters developed to her right leg. The Nurse Practitioner was notified and orders were received to apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow up on an Occupational Therapy recommendation for a resting hand splint for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for position/mobility. (Resident 8) Finding includes: On 8/19/24 at 10:59 a.m., Resident 8 was observed seated in her wheelchair. Her right hand was contracted (tightening of muscle, tendons and skin that causes joints to shorten and become very stiff)and there was not a splint in place. The resident's record was reviewed on 8/20/24 at 2:40 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (one sided weakness) and hemiparesis (one sided paralysis) and unspecified dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/11/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for bed mobility and transfers. The resident received Occupational Therapy from 1/30/24 to 3/29/24. An Occupational Therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was to tolerate a resting hand splint for 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was completed and urinary output was recorded for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident D) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident D was reviewed on 8/22/24 at 10:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 4/12/24. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/11/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A Care Plan, updated 3/26/24, indicated the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. An intervention indicated to monitor and document intake and output. A Physician's Order, dated 3/8/24, indicated 10 cc (cubic centimeters) 18 fr (french, catheter size) Foley catheter with drainage bag to gravity, monitor every shift. The Medication Administration Records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to care for a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter, intravenous catheter placed into the peripheral veins of the upper arm) in accordance with professional standards of practice, related to flushing the PICC line for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for intravenous care. (Resident 25) Finding includes: On 8/19/24 at 2:00 p.m., Resident 25 was observed lying in bed in her room. There was a PICC line in place to her right upper arm. She indicated she had surgery last week and was now getting antibiotics through the line. Resident 25's record was reviewed on 8/20/24 at 3:03 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, abdominal aortic aneurysm, major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/18/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. A Care Plan, updated 8/17/24, indicated the resident was receiving IV (intravenous) antibiotics for a urinary tract infection. A Care Plan, updated 8/19/24, indicated the resident had a PICC line. An intervention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and treatment related to incorrect oxygen flow rate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 22) Finding includes: On 8/19/24 at 10:06 a.m., Resident 22 was observed seated in his room. He had a nasal cannula in place that was attached to an oxygen concentrator and the flow rate was set on 2 liters per minute (lpm). On 8/20/24 at 2:25 p.m., the resident was observed seated in his room. His oxygen was on and flowing at 2.5 lpm. The resident's record was reviewed on 8/21/24 at 10:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/4/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was on oxygen. A Physician's Order, dated 7/16/23, indicated the resident was to receive oxygen at 3 lpm continuously. On 8/21/24 at 1:27 p.m., the oxygen concentrator was observed with the Director of Nursing. She indicated it was set on 2.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was complete and accurate related to incontinence care logs, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence care. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 4/15/24 at 10:37 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure, heart failure, and bipolar disorder. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/18/24. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/18/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder and required assistance with toileting. A Care Plan, dated 12/22/23, indicated the resident had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and respiratory failure. Interventions included, but were not limited to, the resident required staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served and stored under sanitary conditions related to unlabeled and expired food in the refrigerator, dirty refrigerator shelves, lack of hand hygiene during food preparation, dirty utensil bins and a broken oven door. This had the potential to affect 30 residents who received food from the kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Findings include: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 6/26/23 at 8:07 a.m., the following was observed in the reach in refrigerator with the Dietary Aide (DA): - an open pack of sliced cheddar cheese, undated - an open pack of Swiss cheese, undated - sliced ham, dated 5/22/23 - bag of sliced red onions, undated - open bag of shredded cabbage, with a use by date of 6/21/23 - open pack of breaded fish, undated - open pack of breaded chicken, undated There was liquid spillage and food debris on the refrigerator shelves and on the bottom of the refrigerator. Interview with the DA at the time of the observation, indicated the items should be dated when opened, the expired items were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a least 80 square feet (SQ FT) per resident in multiple resident rooms and 100 SQ FT in single occupancy rooms. This was evidenced in 8 of 30 resident rooms in the facility. (Rooms 101, 104, 111, 201, 202, 204, 206, and 208) Findings include: 1. The floor area of the following single resident room measured: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 96.2 SQ FT. NF. 2. The floor areas of the following multiple resident rooms measured: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 150.3 SQ FT, 75.2 SQ FT per bed. NF. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 0 resident, 145.0 SQ FT, 72.5 SQ FT per bed. NF. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 149.0 SQ FT, 74.5 SQ FT per bed. NF. d. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 144.0 SQ FT, 72.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. e. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 144.0 SQ FT, 72.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. f. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 140.0 SQ FT, 70.0 SQ FT per bed. NF. g. room [ROOM NUMBER] - 1 resident, 146.9 SQ FT, 73.4 SQ FT per bed. NF.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functional, safe, and homelike environment related to bent or loose baseboard heater covers, marred and gouged doors and walls, a ripped and torn wheelchair armrest, loose thermostat cover and broken floor tiles for 4 of 30 resident rooms (Rooms 111, 112, 124 and 202) and 2 of 2 units (first and second floor). Findings include: During the Environmental Tour on 6/29/23 from 1:15 p.m.-1:30 p.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor, the following was observed: 1. First floor: a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the baseboard heater cover was bent, loose, and pulling away from the wall. One resident resided in the room. b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the baseboard heater cover was bent and falling off. One resident resided in the room. c. In room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 7's wheelchair armrest was torn and ripped. d. In the dining room, the baseboard heater covers were loose and bent, and the endcap was falling off one end. e. In the hall near the elevator, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was in place for a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 13 residents whose care plans were reviewed. (Resident 33) Finding includes: The record for Resident 33 was reviewed on 6/27/23 at 11:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 4/10/23, indicated the resident had received antipsychotic medication in the past seven days. The June 2023 Physician's Order Summary indicated an order for olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) 5 mg (milligrams) daily. The June 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the resident received the antipsychotic medication as ordered. Interview with the Administrator on 6/27/23 at 3:31 p.m., indicated there had not been a care plan for the antipsychotic medication but staff had now initiated one. 3.1-35(a)

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was invited to their care plan conference for 1 of 13 residents whose plans of care were reviewed. (Resident 19) Finding includes: Interview with Resident 19 on 6/26/23 at 8:59 a.m., indicated she had not been invited to any recent care plan meetings and she could not remember attending one. The record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 6/26/23 at 2:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/9/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Care Plan Note, dated 1/25/23, indicated the IDT (interdisciplinary team) had met with the resident and her daughter. The care plans were reviewed, discussed, and updated. There was lack of documentation the resident had been invited to any care plan meetings or any care plan meetings had been held since 1/25/23. Interview with the Administrator on 6/27/23 at 3:31 p.m., indicated there had been no formal care plan meetings for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions related to lack of planning, education, and supplies for a resident's caregivers on how to care for the resident's ileostomy before the resident's discharge home from the facility for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for ileostomy care. (Resident C) Finding includes: A closed record review for Resident C was completed on 6/28/23 at 1:54 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hypertension, and seizure disorder. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 6/24/23. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/26/23, indicated the resident was cognitively moderately impaired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharged resident had a discharge summary completed, including a post-discharge plan of care with the resident and responsible party, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for discharges. (Resident C) Finding includes: Record review for Resident C was completed on 6/28/23 at 1:54 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hypertension, and seizure disorder. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 6/24/23. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/26/23, indicated the resident was cognitively moderately impaired. The resident required an extensive 2+ person assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. The resident required an extensive 1 person assistance for locomotion, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. The resident had an impairment on one side of his upper extremities for functional limitation in range of motion (ROM).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a lymphedema sleeve was applied as ordered and a scabbed area was assessed and monitored for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for edema and non-pressure skin conditions. (Resident 25) Finding includes: On 6/26/23 at 12:56 p.m., Resident 25 was observed lying in bed watching television. The resident did not have a lymphedema sleeve applied to the left arm. The resident had a visible black scabbed area to the base of his 2nd toenail on the left foot. On 6/27/23 at 1:10 p.m., Resident 25 was observed lying in bed watching television. The resident did not have a lymphedema sleeve applied to the left arm. The black scabbed area was still observed to the base of his 2nd toenail on the left foot. Record review for Resident 25 was completed on 6/27/23 at 9:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), heart failure and diabetes mellitus. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/3/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were available for a newly admitted resident experiencing pain for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain management. (Resident B) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/26/23 at 1:04 a.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE], and left against medical advice on 4/22/23. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, left femur fracture, rectal cancer and spinal stenosis. A 4/21/23 Nursing admission Assessment indicated the resident had a surgical incision on the left hip with 33 staples. A Physician's Order, dated 4/1/23, indicated to give hydrocodone-acetaminophen, (an opioid pain medication) 7.5 milligrams (mg) /325 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain. A Skilled Nursing Note, dated 4/22/23 at 2:03 a.m., indicated at 10:55 p.m., (4/21/23) a call was placed to the pharmacy for authorization to pull hydrocodone-acetaminophen from the EDK (emergency drug kit), The pharmacist informed the nurse there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being, related to labs not completed as ordered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 25) Finding includes: Record review for Resident 25 was completed on 6/27/23 at 9:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), heart failure and diabetes mellitus. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/3/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required an extensive 2+ person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. The resident had an impairment on both sides of his upper and lower extremities for a functional limitation in range of motion (ROM). The June 2023 Physician's Order Summary, indicated the following laboratory orders: - weekly BMP (basic metabolic panel) ordered 5/11/23 - iron studies, Vitamin B12, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in form to meet individual needs related to not following a recipe for pureed food. This had the potential to affect 1 resident who received a pureed diet. (Main Kitchen) Finding includes: On 6/29/23 at 11:15 a.m., the [NAME] was observed preparing pureed cornbread. She indicated she had already made the pureed food for the resident, but would demonstrate how the cornbread was made. She placed a piece of cornbread in the blender, then added some milk. The milk was not measured. There was no recipe in use. She blended the items together. The mixture was thin and soupy. She then took some of the previously prepared pureed cornbread and added it to the mixture in the blender. She indicated there were recipes for everything in the recipe book. The previously prepared pureed cornbread and pureed BBQ riblette were removed from the warming oven. The [NAME] indicated they were ready to be served. The cornbread was thick and dry. The Dietary Manager (DM) indicated it was too thick. The BBQ…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to improper cleaning of reusable equipment for 3 of 4 medication pass observations. (RN 1, LPN 1) Findings include: 1. On 6/28/23 at 9:03 a.m., RN 1 was observed preparing a resident's medications. She placed a wrist blood pressure cuff on the resident's wrist and checked his blood pressure. She then removed the blood pressure cuff and cleaned it using an alcohol prep pad and set it on top of the medication cart. She administered the resident's medications and went on to the next resident. At 9:20 a.m., she prepared the next resident's medications, placed the wrist blood pressure cuff on the resident's wrist, and checked her blood pressure. She then removed the blood pressure cuff and cleaned it using an alcohol prep pad and set it on top of the medication cart. She administered the resident's medications and went on to the next resident. 2. On 6/28/23 at 9:41 a.m., LPN 1 was observed preparing a resident's medications. There was a sign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-06-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have accurate daily nurse staffing postings. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility. Finding includes: On 6/26/23 at 7:50 a.m., the Daily Nursing Staffing Form, dated 6/26/23, was observed posted on the wall near the desk at the main entrance. There was no daily facility census number listed on the form. On 6/29/23 at 10:15 a.m., the Daily Nursing Staffing Forms, dated 6/1/23 through 6/28/23, were reviewed. The daily facility census number was not listed on any of the forms. Interview with the Administrator on 6/29/23 at 10:27 a.m., indicated she was unsure why the census number wasn't listed on the forms and staff would go over the census in their daily meetings. She would update the forms.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IDE MANAGEMENT GROUP — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 11/01/2020
BORNE-BAUMAN, CANDICEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2019
FLUECKIGER, RUSSELLIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2012
LEHMAN, SCOTTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/14/2020
MACKLIN, LARRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2012
MCINTIRE, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2019
ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2012
COLONIAL NURSING AND REHABILITATION LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
SHORT, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/21/2022
SMITH, SCOTTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2020
SPRUNGER, KYLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2018
TEODORI, KRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
WHEELER, DANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2012
GREATOREX, TINAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2025
SCHIOWITZ, MARCIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2025
SEBBAG, GABRIELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2025
119 CROWN POINT PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
BLUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
FIRST BANK OF BERNEOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
LME FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
SAMARA FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$676K
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 6%Other / private 21%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $676K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$383per resident / day
operating cost
$11,650per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$390per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155733. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next